In Clarke's defense it looks like he's in an open floor plan room. And it's overcast outside but the light filtering shades are drawn. Laptop webcam. And it's a re-broadcast; meaning it's not a direct recording of the feed, a camera was pointed directly at his feed on screen somewhere (this is probably why you only saw him and not the larger team from the original AMA). You can see some of this @7:57 as someone pings him on what appears to be Skype, on the bottom right. He appears to be looking at a slide deck being presented on a larger screen further away in front of him - in which case the lights may have been lowered to improve visibility for others in the room. Best guess: Clarke is working out of a rented/shared office somewhere and everyone is connected from their locales.
@@BinanceStuff I watched it live on telegram, their connections dropped out a few times, but all faces could be seen, like I said Maurice was not on the call, not saying this project is legit and still have concerns myself, could the video for the AMA be AI ?
I saw all of them live on camera. I loved the fact that they were so awkward and at the same time so knowledgeable. It’s perfectly along the lines of any well-funded project I’ve ever worked on. It’s like they have the team doing the actual work, looking frazzled and unprofessional, and then they have their extremely pushy and over-the-top marketing people, completely separated from the development project. I was 100% sure it was a scam, but now I actually feel kind of excited about the whole thing🥳
Personally, I don't think half of you so-called “crypto expert” chuckleheads could figure out how to solve a game of Clue. No, I didn't watch through all of you video. I figured I'd just mimic your “investigative” expertise and come up with some logical speculation with little to no viable data.
@@Brian-vs9sd So you are basing the integrity of BlockDAG and the project on lighting and a camera issue. They should have hired a professional camera /audio crew. While they are at it, why not hire an on-set makeup artist🤔? Thanks for that shallow insight, but now you are scraping at the bottom.
@@GK-qq3ik Bitconnnnneeeeect brother. This chain, like many others the last 2 years, were created for one porpose only. But yeah I get it. You don't want anyone "fudding your bags". You need more people in so you have someone as exit liquidity.
@@Brian-vs9sdAre you now speculating that I am an investor? Calling a project a scam without proper due diligence is reckless and akin to Salem witch trial behavior. How about we focus on the project's merit and technical aspects rather than superficial issues like lighting and camera quality?
@@GK-qq3ik I actually could care less about you, your life, and what you invest in. The good thing is. Every comment you do creates engagement and this means we hopefully get more eyes on this so people are not encouraged to invest in a scam. So. Thanks for that. You are emotionally invested in this. I'm not.
So you said you didnt watch it all you skipped though and listened to a few questions how can you form an opinion without watching the whole thing dude really i havent seen it but mabye watch the whole thing
@@Pikamoonjon go away will you... I can see that only one person appeared on camera... the whole thing was amateur hour considering they raised 63+ million... why do you care about this project anyway... what's it got to do with you?
In Clarke's defense it looks like he's in an open floor plan room. And it's overcast outside but the light filtering shades are drawn. Laptop webcam. And it's a re-broadcast; meaning it's not a direct recording of the feed, a camera was pointed directly at his feed on screen somewhere (this is probably why you only saw him and not the larger team from the original AMA).
You can see some of this @7:57 as someone pings him on what appears to be Skype, on the bottom right.
He appears to be looking at a slide deck being presented on a larger screen further away in front of him - in which case the lights may have been lowered to improve visibility for others in the room.
Best guess: Clarke is working out of a rented/shared office somewhere and everyone is connected from their locales.
With that amount of money raised I'd be conducting the AMA with Sofia Vergara on my lap. This looks like it was put together on $7.
@@JeremyBullock-d5w lol... exactly
Selling 12,000 miners is a clear sign of BlockDAG’s growing popularity.
The AMA was hosted on Telegram, all faces could be seen, Maurice was not there, like yourself I'm trying to see of this is a legitimate project or not
@@markmolloy4646 well what I saw I only saw one face in a darkly lit room.
@@BinanceStuff I watched it live on telegram, their connections dropped out a few times, but all faces could be seen, like I said Maurice was not on the call, not saying this project is legit and still have concerns myself, could the video for the AMA be AI ?
I saw all of them live on camera. I loved the fact that they were so awkward and at the same time so knowledgeable. It’s perfectly along the lines of any well-funded project I’ve ever worked on. It’s like they have the team doing the actual work, looking frazzled and unprofessional, and then they have their extremely pushy and over-the-top marketing people, completely separated from the development project. I was 100% sure it was a scam, but now I actually feel kind of excited about the whole thing🥳
@@adminvaktare1870 have you watch the videos by voskcoin and crypto crow?
@@BinanceStuffI’ve watched their pre-AMA stuff, yeah, but I can’t find anything new.
Kiss your money goodbye.
Personally, I don't think half of you so-called “crypto expert” chuckleheads could figure out how to solve a game of Clue. No, I didn't watch through all of you video. I figured I'd just mimic your “investigative” expertise and come up with some logical speculation with little to no viable data.
He could figure out how to show his face in a call and get his lighting correct though. Doesn't say much for the chuckleheads at blockdag does it.
@@Brian-vs9sd So you are basing the integrity of BlockDAG and the project on lighting and a camera issue. They should have hired a professional camera /audio crew. While they are at it, why not hire an on-set makeup artist🤔? Thanks for that shallow insight, but now you are scraping at the bottom.
@@GK-qq3ik Bitconnnnneeeeect brother. This chain, like many others the last 2 years, were created for one porpose only. But yeah I get it. You don't want anyone "fudding your bags". You need more people in so you have someone as exit liquidity.
@@Brian-vs9sdAre you now speculating that I am an investor? Calling a project a scam without proper due diligence is reckless and akin to Salem witch trial behavior. How about we focus on the project's merit and technical aspects rather than superficial issues like lighting and camera quality?
@@GK-qq3ik I actually could care less about you, your life, and what you invest in. The good thing is. Every comment you do creates engagement and this means we hopefully get more eyes on this so people are not encouraged to invest in a scam. So. Thanks for that. You are emotionally invested in this. I'm not.
So you said you didnt watch it all you skipped though and listened to a few questions how can you form an opinion without watching the whole thing dude really i havent seen it but mabye watch the whole thing
@@Pikamoonjon go away will you... I can see that only one person appeared on camera... the whole thing was amateur hour considering they raised 63+ million... why do you care about this project anyway... what's it got to do with you?
@@BinanceStuff the point is your opinions are never form on full information
@@BinanceStuffif i was apart of the community i would be happy that they werent just trowing money away just to apease people like you
i think that guy is a total fuckup!😅
@@Pikamoonjon freaking hell... he could have just turned the light switch on!