I was questioned by the Police for over 45 minutes but remained silent throughout. Two weeks later I received a letter saying that unfortunately on this occasion my application for the role of a Police Officer had been unsuccessful. 🙄
You can NEVER talk your way out of being arrested, but you can ALWAYS talk your way into it. Never talk to Police. Always film Police. Never trust Police.
Finally some clear guidance, say nothing until you have taken legal advice. Only one bit missing, not all lawyers/duty solicitors etc.. are created equal, so always keep your wits about you. The adverse inference bit on the caution is purely to frighten you in to talking, without legal assistance present..As an old friend who is a cop once said to me...most convictions are because someone wouldn't stay silent and convicted themselves..
Yeah I once asked for a lawyer and got a phone call with a duty solicitor 300 miles away in a big city. I didn't feel like they were on my side, like for all I knew it was just another cop on a mobile next door.
@@jedross2136 offence of a crime is contract law, the police operate under TORT LAW, the International council of foreign relations it quoted as saying all crimes are commercial CFR 27 SECTION 72.11, therefore that falls under contract Law, i said international, used under the uniform commercial code, all round the world, just learn the law, it is easy, and put the police back under common law Jurisdiction in which is the ONLY jurisdiction they operate under, they don't like you being informed of you're rights, when you learn your rights, there is nothing they can do to you in a statuary court
this man only knows Acts/statues and legislations, as he is a court official, they only know contract law, common law is never used in a statuary/Admiralty court, because you will not be held to a count when using you're rights under common law, without an injured party making a claim against you, there is no clai m, but if you are charged with a crime without an injured party, then it falls under contract law, without a contract court holds "NO" authority or Jurisdiction to prosecute, hold the courts to account, always ask what Jurisdiction is this court operating under, if it is criminal without a injured party then the court holds no standing in LAW
@@spider14768 Not another armchair advocate. I bet you're one of these clowns who thinks he can obstruct the execution of county court warrants by claiming to be a freeman of the land. Why don't you run along now and watch some David Icke vids.
I had a £3000 ebike stolen. Took the police 3 weeks to look at the cctv footage so, from my experience, they're not interested in questioning anybody. We seem to live in a quasi lawless country in The UK.
Same here a few years back. They had CCTV but ended up waiting months until they eventually sent an email saying the case is being closed unless the thief turns up and they can pin the face to the name.. whats the point!
a year or two ago I had an over-the-road neighbour who had a few housebricks thrown through his double-glazed windows off the street. A house very nearby had superb quality CCTV footage (which he showed me, as I had helped him do a rapid boarding-up), showing the car, the two occupants, and the licence plate. The police could not have cared less, despite their incredible ease of following up.
I know of a farmer who had equipment stolen that had a tracker on it. Police told him to claim it on insurance. There was also a spate of shop thefts in the local town. Most shops didn't even get a visit from police, just a crime number.
Too much effort for them. Anything stolen will have been fenced within a matter of hours so that's gone and not being recovered. Everything's insured so who gives a toss. Here's a "crime number" for your claim, crime solved, case closed. If the thief can be identified it'll be someone already known to them and can they be bothered having to pick them up for the umpteenth time to go through the same old same. Put the kettle on and let's have a look at Twitter to see if we can spot some thought crimes being committed by people we can easily find and bully. Good old British policing.
Never speak to them until you have been arrested and are at the police station, even then, only give them your name and address. The only exception is if you are the *driver* of a vehicle, in which case you have to give them your name and address if stopped. Never attend police stations voluntarily, never give statements, never do anything voluntarily. If you are arrested, never have the "duty solicitor", know the name of a law firm in your area who seem OK and request them. Even then, the solicitor is *only* to keep the police from bullying you. In interview, you still say nothing UNLESS you have an "ace card" that TOTALLY exonerates you. For example, if you were in Barbados on the day it happened, say so, otherwise say NOTHING..
Many years ago I was arrested by local police . I knew it was coming and had sought out the name of a reputable solicitor from a town 40 miles away . He arrived on a Kawasaki GPZ 900 . The police were so suspicious of him that the checked out his credentials with the Law Society ! He walked into the room and never said a single word until he had counted his fee . It was like switching on a light bulb . The balance of power changed in a instant . Very eloquent and pushed every point of my defence to the hilt . Result , Not charged .
Having been arrested by the police and released without an charges, i can only advise what others have said don't say anything without first taking legal advice from a solicitor that you trust. I am very lucky in having one as a relation, and has contacts to obtain the correct advice. The police are only interested in obtaing a result, don't become a soft target for them.
Absolute ****! No one is interested in prosecuting the wrong person. Doesn’t help the victim of the crime. Do you honestly think that cops go home at their end of their shift knowing that they have charged the wrong person and think they have done a good job. They are just normal people trying to do an impossible task. If you get caught breaking the law , then don’t blame the cops for doing their job. How about not breaking the law? Our barrister friend clearLy has no respect for criminal law and is the type that makes a lot of money protecting criminals.
@@clanmac66 The police that arrested me were far too young, and tried to intimidate me, so i went silent on them until my solicitor arrived. Turned out that they had no evidence against me.
Spot on Allan! Same happened to me and I already knew of the best local solicitor and they called him in. They tried to get me to open up before he got there but I just said "I better wait thanks!" Off they trotted to CPS but he'd already made mincemeat of their flimsy evidence. Cas dropped and released without charge, a cop did say to me that it was because I got a damn good solicitor and not just the duty one who would have just accepted a caution.
@@thetruth9210 You get the initial consultation and Police dealings free. If they are good it won't go to court so no charge. That is why you MUST get an experienced solicitor.
I had two officers come round to my house because I said something in the letters page of my local newspaper. They said it was concerning my comments about travellers. I asked them what I said (because I knew I hadn't said anything unlawful). They didn't know as they hadn't read it. They left after five minutes.
That would be one of those crime, not crime, thought crimes that will show up on a criminal records check and is reliant on the potential employer reading all of the record to reveal it isn't a crime or criminal conviction.
I remember that a few years ago, some travellers turned up with their caravans in a green space near our home. That weekend, 2 houses were burgled and a car was stolen. No prize in guessing who was responsible. But anything saidvagainst the traveller community is now racism, because they are now treated as an ethnic group. So the police were probably obliged to talk to you because all reports of racism need to be investigated to comply with equality laws, etc.
Get a good solicitor at the station and don't say anything until then! Don't be aggressive or nasty about, try to stay on their good side and just wait and keep your gob shut.
The best lines I was taught in business school if being detained or issued a ticket. 'I will put you on notice that I will cooperate with you fully by means of a written statement after seeking legal advice'! Get the ticket or get arrested. keep your mouth shut, be professional. Dont say you know the law. Demonstrate you know the law by being quiet. Most lawyers worth their salt won't even let you talk to the police in a formal interview. They will accept questions and draft a written statement to address the police's concerns after. you are under know obligation to communicate with the police accept for grounds of identification where relevant.
I have been told by an officer friend, NEVER speak to a police person! Always get legal advice. NEVER speak to the law without representation. Even if you are innocent.
*ESPECIALLY if you are innocent The most foolish thing a person can say is "well, I'm innocent, so nothing bad can come from talking about it". Bad bad choice. Firstly, no one knows they are innocent. No one even knows how many laws exist. How can anyone possibly know if they're innocent of every possible offence? Secondly, an innocent person could give information that is misconstrued or misunderstood
@@catman2629 there is this new thing called the internet and the newspapers and the emails and the mobile phone and they let you disseminate information anonymously
@@catman2629 immediately seek advice of a lawyer and use him to issue a statement to the police sharing what you know. If this is mishandled they may turn on you without you knowing and you could become a suspect unknowingly. It's happened before. It will happen again
When I was a police officer,the caution was “Do you wish to say anything?You are not obliged to say anything unless you wish to do so,but anything you do say will be written down and may be given in evidence”Straight forward especially the not obliged to say anything. Then it changed,I am not typing it out but now it clearly infers that if you say nothing a judge or jury will disbelieve anything you say in court. What’s the point of giving someone the right to say nothing then effectively punishing them for exercising that right?In the military I was trained to resist interrogation so I would be inclined to look at the floor and keep repeating my name rank and number.
The first thing that all cops tell their wives, husbands and children when they are contacted by Police is to NEVER TALK TO POLICE. The ONLY interest that Police have in talking to you is to assess your guilt and determine if they can charge you. It really is that simple. Shut up or pay the price.
As a motorist stopped by uniformed police, ( they took umbrage because I refused to join them in their car so they could check my I.D.) How far do I have to obey their orders. They called for assistance who proceeded to examine the vehicle, bodywork, tyres e.t.c. I was then told to turn on my lights, indicators screen washers, wipers and various other instruments. Do I have to assist them to incriminate me?
Thanks Mr Blackbelt for your expertise. Advice duly noted. Can I mention something unrelated I have a bit of knowledge about? I can't help noticing whoever hung your gate has put the hinges on the wrong side as the diagonal braces are designed to be in compression. Usually you order a left or right hung gate or get loose braces which can be installed either way. A gate hung such as yours will begin to sag over time and not last very long.
@@stonemason4902 I also need a new gate or move the existing one to the boundary of the property - so that police cannot enter on suspicion that a suspect they might be looking to arrest for an indictable offence is within. They can't kick the door down unless they have reason to believe the suspect is within - if they can't see in to the back garden or through any of the windows, (and you have a nice big CCTV camera pointing at them with a big red light showing it's recording), they will go away and have to get a warrant.
I believe I said this many videos ago. The police are not to be trusted, and I think someone should tell them what their job actually is, at least make sure it is a solicitor, and not a paralegal, preferably a solicitor you know. Don't think the fact that you are totally innocent is a defence, because it isn't..
If the police are questioning you they’re on a fishing trip and are not your friend. They’re looking for you to incriminate yourself. The police will even take what you say out of context to use against you. Remember you have the right to remain silent and it can’t be seen as a sign of guilt. You don’t have to prove anything, the burden of proof is on the police.
You live in the past! If you fail to mention when questioned something you later want to rely on in court as your defence or even just a part of it, if you don't tell the police the judge will tell the jury that if they are satisfied they can say to themselves "He didn't have an answer/defence at the time and he's subsequently made one up!" That's a disaster. Wait, see a solicitor, get disclosure so you know what you're being accused of in detail, then answer questions or make a written statement.
@@johnmarsh2078 If you talk to them and fail to mention something, then yes. That's why you don't talk to them... How difficult is this to understand? 😂
The Police have a duty to investigate offences or suspected offences, that starts with asking questions. The likelihood of an officer seeking to fit someone up is extremely remote, they simply are not looking to prosecute innocent people despite what you think or the media want to portray.
BlackBeltBarrister I'm sure that I can say for myself as well as all your subscribers that were really thankful for all the useful information that you have provided us. We really appreciate the time and effort you take to make these videos. 👏
He's extremely good. He does tend to state things from an idealistic "lawyer" perspective and doesn't seem to realise that there's "lore and law", i.e. the police often don't act as the law states, but he still makes some very good points in his videos.
Whilst not disagreeing with I’d suggest that the Police’s job is just to gather evidence to prosecute you, not to determine what happened. Just like the rest of the legal system, the police do not exist for justice. If they can gather enough ‘evidence” to make a case that a 90 year old woman beat up a gang of teenagers despite the fact she was wheelchair bound and abroad at the time they would. You can see the way they work with the investigation into the parties at 10 Downing Street. Each was a separate offence and each will be investigated separately. That way they can improve their “clear up” rate.
Trevor. The Police do gather evidence but they also need to understand what happened in relation to how the offence occurred, i.e are there any other offenders to locate as a result of further information.
Over 20 years ago in my early 20's I was arrested and charged with a fraud. I had been on a bit of a crime spree a few years before and had learned my ways.. In the past I had always been very upfront and admitted what I done when presented with the evidence against me! This arrest for fraud was a complete misunderstanding, I was comple innocent. Anyway I got all the way to crown court, my barrister intertigated me to find out if I done it, and then my barrister went to the bench spoke to the judge and judge ordered the jury to find me not guilty on a legal technicality. 18 months of hell was over wondering if I would be found guilty. It really did give me faith in the legal system. The biggest mistake was not getting a duty solicitor. I didn't get a solicitor because I was under the wrong impression that getting a solicitor would make me look guilty. It's the same as not talking to police it does not make you look guilty. If you ever get arrested. Do not talk and get a solicitor. Also the police will tell your solicitor a bit more about what evidence they have against you!
Sound advice. Comments agree: say nothing to police. Use a trusted solicitor. Never go voluntarily to police station. If arrested give only your name and address. Tell police you are using your right to remain silent and will not be responding to any questions in interview. If you have a trusted solicitor present still remain silent. You could discuss with a solicitor in private wether to present a written statement. This would usually only be if you have a strong alibi.
This is great advice. Stay silent. Don't be railroaded into thinking it makes you look guilty. If they arrest you as a scare tactic to wear you down still stay silent. Duty solicitors work closely with the police and some if not most will tell you to plead guilty or get worse punishment. Not always the best advice, They don't want to spend time on a case that creates little income so if you plead guilty it's a quick slam dunk. I know many solicitors who employ ex cops to work on these cases and they almost always try to get a guilty plea or they won't take the case forward. Justice is for the wealthy
@@ianhandforth5672 Say nothing. No comment is an admission that you heard the question. They then might say you looked shocked or guilty for the recording about a certain question and will draw an inference from your reaction. Close your eyes and pretend to be asleep.
Duty solicitors do not work closely with the Police. It is nothing more than a game to them, they want to get you off with an offence because it's a win for them. Doesn't matter if it's morally right or not, it's their job.
I had my eyes opened years ago when on a jury. I had naively believed the old adage if you are innocent you should have nothing to worry about. The case against the guy was very thin, paper thin in fact, but they chanced their arm anyway. Luckily the judge was on his toes and read them the riot act over it. This was before the CPS so I don't know if they have raised their standards since then.
@@evelghostrider They keep changing the rules and the referee is biased, and you have to pay to play with better players at better venues with better refs
The Police are nothing but investigators and reporters. It's a job. Nothing more. They have no other function other than to find someone, anyone, that will fit the profile of the crime, in the cheapest and most timeous way possible. True guilt mostly does not matter. This is evidenced by the countless number of innocents sent to jail or the gallows over the years and yet still continue to be falsely convicted based on their lies. They are stats driven by high-pressure, time constrictive demands from supervisors that rode that wave and are now on top and are able to do the demanding. Beyond a particular rank, Police become more political than legal. This is where the greatest Police crimes happen.
And this all goes back to the wonderful Magna Carta. Clause 38 (in the modern translation) says “no official shall place a man on trial upon his own unsupported statement, without producing credible witnesses to the truth of it.” In other words, you do not have to prove you are innocent, the Police (on behalf of the Crown) have to prove that you are guilty - hence anything other than "No comment" is helping them, not you.
What a shame it is that our police are not interested in fairness or truth, I can only assume that they are a rather strange set of people who care only for their careers, and on the quiet enjoy using power to further injustice while looking virtuous to those not aware of their real nature - because it is their actual character, not 'just doing the job', that is responsible. I was brought up on friendly old Dixon Of Dock Green, which looking back was propaganda even then.
No no. You need to go back inside so I can try to work out what’s on your ceiling and how that room works. I’m not ready for other parts of the house yet
The example I was given was being asked where you were at a certain time. You, based on your daily routine, answer "I was at home at 6pm on Wednesday". However, you simply forgot that on that particular night you had been running late and at 6pm, you were actually seen on the CCTV of the local garage, where unbeknown to you, the offense occurred. When this evidence is presented conflicting with your story, you are immediately discredited as a witness and if you are the defendant, your solicitor has his work cut out.
REMEMBER THE POLICE ARE VERY BENT/ DISHONEST AND CORRUPT. THEY WILL SAY ANYTHING TO U TO INCRIMINATE YOURSELF.U MUST BE VERY CAREFUL WHEN DEALING WITH THE POLICE
Important channel, I’m a normal middle class guy with no record, and yet I was taken to court and pleaded guilty and was totally exonerated; over a hair brained case that the prosecution said was ‘weird’ ….thanks again.
great video... there is a video on TH-cam of an emerican lawyer giving a speach to I think his students of why you should never talk to the police and what you say can be twisted into incriminate you... very interesting watch...
Regent University School of Law Don't Talk to the Police th-cam.com/video/d-7o9xYp7eE/w-d-xo.html Watch the whole video, especially when the ex-cop tells you to NEVER talk to Police.
Daniel A very good afternoon Good to see your taking time to rest, albeit it a short one. I personally have never been stopped and questioned by Police other than two speeding tickets and an occasion whereby I was asked my details back in 1978 because synchro had gone in first gear on my Mini 1275, he asked me to blow in the tube and when negative, proceeded to ask me loads of questions on my education, my vocation, address etc etc, the only other occasion was on 2007 when in my 300C when I crossed the traffic lights as it turned to Amber, the PC was 90 degrees to my near side so couldn’t possibly of seen my actual traffic light, he followed me and blue lighted to pull me over, he was quite aggressive but I stood my ground but remained respectful, he accused me of being an “Amber Gambler” and because l said to him he was mistaken he said to me “he hadn’t got the time to argue with the likes of me” and promptly drove off! The information contained within your video presentation is most beneficial and useful to know although hopefully, we won’t need to use it! I would imagine the police love the fact a top Barrister is making Joe Public aware of the law! My respect goes out to you. Best
You were lucky I was stopped and told I'd run a stop sign. I hadn't. He eventually after a verbal spar agreed I'd stopped but saud I'd failed to apply my hand brake so I was ticketed. When I questioned that being a law he insisted it was. So I said I'd fight it. He said it's my word against yours and so you'll lose because I will say you didn't stop. I paid the fine two days wages. If it fought it it would have been 3 days wages for taking a day off work. So no I don't trust the police. I reported him but they wouldn't accept the complaint as they said Id admitted fault.
A very well-known solicitor once advised me to carry his card at all times in my wallet and produce it and respond that I'm happy to answer any and all questions on the proviso my solicitor is present. Anyone who knows anyone in the police will tell you the one and ONLY measure of performance when officers apply for promotions is their arrest vs conviction rates. If you willingly allow yourself to be engaged in conversation with them, you are inviting entrapment, coercion & the inference you may have done something wrong. Personally I trust the police about as far as I can spit and I absolutely refuse any conversation, enquiry or "chat" they want to have. I don't care if they ask me for the time, I'm not talking to them under any circumstances.
@@catman2629 once, for refusing to answer questions. Received a rather generous compensation payout once my solicitor pursued it via the IOPC. Just because someone mistrusts the police doesn't automatically make them a criminal.
Police officer: "I'm detaining you because you're under investigation for suspicious activity" Auditor: "What crime do you suspect me of committing?" Police officer: "That's what I am investigating. What are you doing here?" Auditor: "That's what I am investigating. What are you doing here?" Police officer: "I'm investigating suspicious activity, what's your name?" Auditor: "I'm investigating suspicious activity, what's your name?" Police officer: "I don't have to give you my name. Have you got any I.D. on you?" Auditor: "I don't have to give you my name. Have you got any I.D. on you?" ...and so on... When will they get the message?
When arrested the only thing you're allowed to say is: "I want three sugars in my tea." TBH, if I were ever arrested I'd first ask for refreshments, then ask for note taking materials, then ask all officers for all their details and painstakingly write them down, then spend hours with my lawyer, then for each question I would reply, "I will answer through my lawyer," and my lawyer would say "no comment."
Not all Barrister are created equal , IE there was Once up on a time certain Solicitor’s were Fast tracked to Barrister status ( they are still around though few in number now ) but they are potentially mines in the system , do not use them. At your own peril ....
@@andrewfrancis3591 oh yeah none taken, I know what you mean now. Much to the annoyance of my company, I’m brutally honest to a lot of my customers, helps me sleep at night lol
Its an interesting subject where if innocent, talking to police shouldnt be an issue, however they are so hell bent on catching someone you are at risk in the corrupt police system. But lets be honest this advice is really to help stop guilty people getting caught
When you don’t answer their questions they try to say your obstructing or being difficult but it’s your right to silence and they want info for their benefit not yours. No Id no information only a blank look is all I’ll give them
I once would have totally disagreed with every word you said here, but now, having once always supported the police and even very wanted to join them, I now very much agree with you. Our police in a way have become like a military police arm of an occupying enemy that has successfully invaded us, who now no longer have any desire to be fair, decent and promote justice but just want to get their number of convictions EVEN if they know full well the person is innocent. My poor country, so please I am old and lived in a time when we had a proper police force.
What rubbish - the Police can arrest “On suspicion” - if you are stopped when the Police Office is searching an area for someone who has just committed a crime and you say, “ No comment - I’m saying nothing” - that gives suspicion that you have been involved in the crime - because normal innocent people are usually very pleased to tell you what they were doing. This advice is designed to encourage you to use Solicitors who will make money out of your claim via the Court. My advice - if stopped by the Police and you have been acting normally - then be polite - don’t be a smart Alec - leave that to the Lawyers.
I have a learning disability that affects my communication skills to which I inform plod of immediately they spout the "caution". To a range of reactions by plod of which one is to inform (threaten)me that this will entail my being held longer. Anyhow(after 20 minutes to 5 hours) they then introduce me to an "appropriate adult". My experience with these individuals range from them working in the staff canteen (at least 1 year ESL) to earnest volunteer. On 3 occasions they "advised" me. Either way they are picked by my gaolers so I am reluctant to acknowledge their suitability. Having done my best to evaluate my appointed and finding them wanting or mid questioning they "advise" me thus blatantly inappropriate I terminate the questioning (caught on tape too) am I within my rights and will my refusal to continue affect negatively should I go to court? 👉🤔👈
I'm a OAP quite some time ago i was unjustly assaulted by a thug pub doorman leaving me with injured spine. the police refused to take action but instead told me if i didn't go home they would arrest me, see my post with CCTV footage
I was brought up to respect police. The way they behaved during the miners strike ended that. I will never forgive them for that. Now I would not pee on one who was on fire.
If a police officer approaches me and says he/she would like to talk to me about a possible "thing" that he/she is investigating, do I have to talk. Can I say "I dont talk to police without legal representation" and walk away. What powers does he/she have to detain me, without arrest. Can I envoke my rights to silence. What action can they then take against me. What rights do I have to be left in peace and go on my way?
If police were fair rather than trying to act like judge and jury they would not try and trick you, would not try and twist your words. All they want is an arrest of some kind, truth doesn't matter to them. Never cooperate, never help. Be polite but that is it, no talk.
Do Police have to tell you and/or show you or your solicitor the evidence against you before their interview? Do they have to tell you what charge they arrested you for? In my experience, Police arrest first, then make the charge fit the witnesses' statements or CCTV 24 hours later at the interview. What does the law say they MUST do before any interview begins? And if the Police don't comply - can the interview be used in evidence, or is it nullified by the polce's failure to e.g.to tell you what the charge is first, or what evidence they have before the interview? Can the jury draw an adverse inference from "no comment" in interview if the police did not comply with their obligations before the interview? The CPS will ignore the police's failings anyway and claim to the court you gave a "no comment" interview, so how do you get the judge to tell them they can't use the no comment interview because it was invalid? And how is a solicitor supposed to be an authority on your fitness to answer questions - they aren't doctors or mental health professionals or neurologists etc.
Anything you say can be used in evidence against you. They are not going to use it to as evidence in your favour. That's not their role, so shut up and talk to your legal advisor.
On a slightly different note. An ex-colleague of mine was once involved in a road traffic accident (or incident as it is now termed). His was by far the greatest fault. I saw him quite soon after the incident. The police were clear that they were going to charge him and take the case to court and he said that he intended to defend himself and plead guilty. I looked him squarely in the eye and said, "He who defends himself has a fool for a client". After a short discussion he decided he WOULD seek legal advice. He thanked me later and said that it was the best thing he could have done. Effectively he got a slapped wrist for a very stupid mistake - by no way was he an idiot boy racer. Legal advice may be expensive but in the long run often proves to be a damn sight cheaper!
With regards to unlawful detainment, I watched a TH-cam video a few days back from a chap called YARDLEY SKI called" handcuffed detained & searched outside Rwanda house ". Where it goes to pot is at 7:15 minutes mark. I'm seeing many uk auditors getting arrested on section 43. Police are abusing this section and their powers. It's totally ridiculous. Imo.
No-one (correctly) gets arrested under Sec 43 Terr. Act. This section provides Police with the power to only search an individual and provides no power of arrest UNLESS they are carrying items related to terrorism (hence a crime). There is no requirement to ID under Sec 43, however, legally ignorant cops will often do so, only to be released without charge some hours later when bigger brains get involved and thus providing enough evidence for a positive civil case against the Police.
Some years ago I stopped my car, got out, and asked if a Bobby that I knew needed help as he was strugling on the ground with someome. With the reply of no thankyou and with many officers running to help I exited :)
@@Jester-Riddle Until an act is passed by parliament it is not a law but a law is always a law because it has already been established, very similar but not the same!! But a lot of police don't even know the laws let alone acts!!!
@@stigg333 You are talking rot. There is no point in referring to an Act that has not been passed by Parliament, as it is at that stage merely a proposal on a piece of paper ... The Police don't ever use 'acts' (as you denote them) that haven't been passed into Law as they are meaningless. The Police can only apply the Law, so I have no idea what rabbit hole some idiot has sent you down ... Furthermore, for example, the Law of Tort was never a Law until it became Law via the Court System ... It wasn't Legislated into Law, but was a new development of Contract Law, although it doesn't require a Contract. I do hope that you aren't studying Law ... because you should ask for a refund from whoever is teaching you !
@ blackbelt barrister. (I been subscribed to for a long while now and enjoy watching your videos), but this time I need some expert advice or opinion from you. I was neglected to access seeing a doctor 👨⚕️ by the reception staff in my health centre. The receptionist had no Knowledge of medical and refused to give me a appointment and told me it is not urgent & to see a dermatologist for skin instead. (After this call there was a 4 day delay as it was good Friday and then weekends and bank holiday Monday. Luckily then next day when i went to see a local boots pharmacist I was told I had a skin infection and I should have not been turned away. I am absolutely furious with the health centre reception and worried of permanent scarring on my face now. Any advice about suing? Kind regards.
Never met a broke Politician never met a poor lawyer.... met loads of skint Criminals In the hierarchy of doubtful morality 1. Politicians 2. Lawers 3. Criminals
"The police know what the elements of the offence are..." watch any auditing video and you will see majority of police DONT know the law, this guy has a very optimistic view of police officers knowledge levels.
Ignore it. If they wanted to arrest/charge you, they would have by now. If you attend the interview you will be interrogated for several hours in order to incriminate yourself, after which you will probably be arrested and charged once the Police have got enough evidence. VIs are just fishing trips because the usually have nothing.
Generally these are for summary offense, these are generally limited to 6 months from the time of the offense allegedly took place. You can ignore these for the most part, these are just used to get confessions out of people.
In my experience the "voluntary interview" is in reality "a police interview under caution" and is a tactic to get the person to come forward to attend an interview and if the person opts not to go, they will probably be arrested in order to get the interview. Its a trick to lull that person into a false sense of security so that they may incriminate themselves more easily. If someone is asked to attend a "voluntary interview" sometimes also referred to as a "a little chat, nothing to worry about", at that point they must immediately find an independant legal advisor who will come with them to the police station.
@@BaddaBigBoom In the old book. However, the Government UK Ltd was incorporated at companies House in June 2005 then departments broken up and sold then registered at Dun & Bradstreet. American branch. Not the branch in England, either. Now owned by Walmart and others. This includes various police. So now you tell them that they and their fake pirate law courts (caughts) have no more authority than pound land staff over members of the public. Employees of private companies cannot lawfully no legally, not even with legalese, wield authority over us. Same goes for council tax (two years running mine has been written off due to their Treason, fraud, malfeasance etc. Don't expect any solicitor or barrister to verify this. It's their income! Research it for yourself for the facts. It is also separate from 'Freeman of the Land' etc so you don't have to get involved in any of that if you don't want to. Quite simply, a privatised Home Office cannot authorise any privatised police or security company to act against anyone - who refuses to acquiesce. They cannot demand you go for interviews, arrest you with or without proof, take you to caught nor imprison you if you tell them outright they are private companies and have no authority to do so. I haven't tried it with anything beyond council tax (haven't needed to) and of course in a serious enough case such as murder they are likely to do what they do regardless of whether they have the authority. However, for lesser matters they are likely to back down rather than have people state these facts in public caught. They don't want it known so it is likely to be more expedient to let lesser matters drop - unless the officer in charge decides to be a bluddy minded pig and push his luck, in which case it would be worth rising to the challenge and stating the facts; that they are fraudulent in their fake caught/court - if physically dragged there. Then sue them under the 'laws' they choose to adhere to.
What would likely happen if you are invited to attend a voluntary interview, and officer claims they have video evidence of you throwing an object at your neighbors property during an altercation (in which they were goading you and filming despite being repeatedly told you have serious mental illnesses) but you didn't actually throw the object at them or their property but did throw the object at your own garden wall and (perhaps but not known some debris fell into their garden) no damage caused to their property.?
Ignore the threats, continue to say nothing and smile while you watch them tear themselves apart inside. Most Police are clowns and clowns love to perform.
Although it wasn't in England... I had some punk intentionally try to run me over in my own drive. I called the cops and reported it. A uniform came by and was taking a statement. Then this hotshot in a bulletproof vest (yes, this was TX) shows up and starts hurling accusations at me. Long story short, if I didn't drop the matter, I'd get arrested. I suspect the kid or some of his gang were friends/family of the hotshot. I used to support the police. Now I wouldn't talk to them if I witnessed a murder.
@@k.chriscaldwell4141 The uniform guy was actually pretty nice. It was the hotshot in the vest that got all bolshy. As with nearly all professions, there are some good and some bad. Getting a bad grade is one thing - getting arrested is a bit more serious.
A 'no comment' interview looks very suspicious because, of course, it is a common choice for guilty people. The guilty person is hoping to find out what evidence the police have so that they can invent a story that dodges around the evidence. Making a statement that proactively explains what happened as clearly as you can is a better choice for innocent, law abiding citizens. This is what the Black Belt Barrister is advising so I don't understand why this video has the title 'Why you don't talk to police'. You should talk to the police and having an expert to help you do it fully and clearly is good advice. If you actually committed a crime then the best thing to do is confess in detail without delay and subsequently plead guilty. Do not add to your crime by wasting the resources of the justice system on your dishonest attempt to get away with it.
Discuss with your lawyer: Concoct a story. Let's be honest, it goes on, it's not about the truth or any kind of morals on behalf of a defence solicitor.
@@ThePereubu1710 I don't think there's any doubt that sometimes, individual officers do abuse their powers, but it isn't the norm by any stretch of the imagination despite what the media may try to portray.
@@SuperBobbster The media don't "like to portray that police are always abusing their powers". They point out that the systems that are in place, allow these corrupt or bad actors to get away with it. It's comparable to the whole Catholic church scandal. Of course not all priests are p*does, not even most, but the church will cover up wrongdoing so the church doesn't end up looking bad. It's the same with the police, and with politics. It is of the utmost importance to them that they don't look bad, so they will cover up and lie about wrongful behaviour rather than admit to it. Almost always when one of these awful people are dealt with, their bad behaviour was already known and covered up. And that's why media calling it out is so important. If it were up to people like you, we'd be sliding right into a corrupt authoritarian police state, because passing off bad practice as "a problem of individuals" and demonising the press who speak out against police injustice is exactly how these societies form.
Providing a proper thought out statement about what did or didn't happened rather than giving off the cuff responses to trained interrogators in a stressful situation can't possibly be harmful to your defence if you are innocent. If you're a wrong un' though its probably better to not give them any information at all.
Getting legal advice is part of making a proper thought out statement. You need external advice from someone who knows what the law does and doesn't say.
I say "I dont stand under you and I will not say my name as my right to stay silent and I will not contract with you". My name is always written as :Joe of the family:Blogs
![[#2024MAMA] ROSÉ (로제), Bruno Mars - APT. | Mnet 241122 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dgGqD28J6aQ/mqdefault.jpg)
I was questioned by the Police for over 45 minutes but remained silent throughout. Two weeks later I received a letter saying that unfortunately on this occasion my application for the role of a Police Officer had been unsuccessful. 🙄
Hilarious!
Hahahahahahaha
Nice one, thanks for putting a big smile on my face. Love and respect from not so sunny Devon.
Better safe than sorry John
Very good.
You can NEVER talk your way out of being arrested, but you can ALWAYS talk your way into it.
Never talk to Police. Always film Police. Never trust Police.
WELL said Colin.
If the police ask you questions simply say "I don't have to tell you that officer".
Finally some clear guidance, say nothing until you have taken legal advice. Only one bit missing, not all lawyers/duty solicitors etc.. are created equal, so always keep your wits about you. The adverse inference bit on the caution is purely to frighten you in to talking, without legal assistance present..As an old friend who is a cop once said to me...most convictions are because someone wouldn't stay silent and convicted themselves..
Yeah I once asked for a lawyer and got a phone call with a duty solicitor 300 miles away in a big city. I didn't feel like they were on my side, like for all I knew it was just another cop on a mobile next door.
@@jedross2136 offence of a crime is contract law, the police operate under TORT LAW, the International council of foreign relations it quoted as saying all crimes are commercial CFR 27 SECTION 72.11, therefore that falls under contract Law, i said international, used under the uniform commercial code, all round the world, just learn the law, it is easy, and put the police back under common law Jurisdiction in which is the ONLY jurisdiction they operate under, they don't like you being informed of you're rights, when you learn your rights, there is nothing they can do to you in a statuary court
this man only knows Acts/statues and legislations, as he is a court official, they only know contract law, common law is never used in a statuary/Admiralty court, because you will not be held to a count when using you're rights under common law, without an injured party making a claim against you, there is no clai
m, but if you are charged with a crime without an injured party, then it falls under contract law, without a contract court holds "NO" authority or Jurisdiction to prosecute,
hold the courts to account, always ask what Jurisdiction is this court operating under, if it is criminal without a injured party then the court holds no standing in LAW
The barrister keeps blocking me so we the people don't get to see it
@@spider14768 Not another armchair advocate.
I bet you're one of these clowns who thinks he can obstruct the execution of county court warrants by claiming to be a freeman of the land.
Why don't you run along now and watch some David Icke vids.
I had a £3000 ebike stolen. Took the police 3 weeks to look at the cctv footage so, from my experience, they're not interested in questioning anybody. We seem to live in a quasi lawless country in The UK.
Same here a few years back. They had CCTV but ended up waiting months until they eventually sent an email saying the case is being closed unless the thief turns up and they can pin the face to the name.. whats the point!
a year or two ago I had an over-the-road neighbour who had a few housebricks thrown through his double-glazed windows off the street. A house very nearby had superb quality CCTV footage (which he showed me, as I had helped him do a rapid boarding-up), showing the car, the two occupants, and the licence plate. The police could not have cared less, despite their incredible ease of following up.
I know of a farmer who had equipment stolen that had a tracker on it. Police told him to claim it on insurance. There was also a spate of shop thefts in the local town. Most shops didn't even get a visit from police, just a crime number.
Too much effort for them. Anything stolen will have been fenced within a matter of hours so that's gone and not being recovered. Everything's insured so who gives a toss. Here's a "crime number" for your claim, crime solved, case closed. If the thief can be identified it'll be someone already known to them and can they be bothered having to pick them up for the umpteenth time to go through the same old same. Put the kettle on and let's have a look at Twitter to see if we can spot some thought crimes being committed by people we can easily find and bully. Good old British policing.
Should have told them your pronouns they would came over right away.
Never speak to them until you have been arrested and are at the police station, even then, only give them your name and address. The only exception is if you are the *driver* of a vehicle, in which case you have to give them your name and address if stopped. Never attend police stations voluntarily, never give statements, never do anything voluntarily.
If you are arrested, never have the "duty solicitor", know the name of a law firm in your area who seem OK and request them.
Even then, the solicitor is *only* to keep the police from bullying you. In interview, you still say nothing UNLESS you have an "ace card" that TOTALLY exonerates you. For example, if you were in Barbados on the day it happened, say so, otherwise say NOTHING..
Many years ago I was arrested by local police . I knew it was coming and had sought out the name of a reputable solicitor from a town 40 miles away .
He arrived on a Kawasaki GPZ 900 . The police were so suspicious of him that the checked out his credentials with the Law Society !
He walked into the room and never said a single word until he had counted his fee . It was like switching on a light bulb . The balance of power changed in a instant . Very eloquent and pushed every point of my defence to the hilt . Result , Not charged .
Excellent. Now he can upgrade to the zzr1100 😂
What a load of bollocks
Having been arrested by the police and released without an charges, i can only advise what others have said
don't say anything without first taking legal advice from a solicitor that you trust.
I am very lucky in having one as a relation, and has contacts to obtain the correct advice.
The police are only interested in obtaing a result, don't become a soft target for them.
Absolute ****! No one is interested in prosecuting the wrong person. Doesn’t help the victim of the crime. Do you honestly think that cops go home at their end of their shift knowing that they have charged the wrong person and think they have done a good job. They are just normal people trying to do an impossible task. If you get caught breaking the law , then don’t blame the cops for doing their job. How about not breaking the law? Our barrister friend clearLy has no respect for criminal law and is the type that makes a lot of money protecting criminals.
I can only concur with this advice more especially, if like me you have communication problems.
@@clanmac66 The police that arrested me were far too young, and tried to intimidate me, so i went silent on them until my solicitor arrived.
Turned out that they had no evidence against me.
Spot on Allan! Same happened to me and I already knew of the best local solicitor and they called him in. They tried to get me to open up before he got there but I just said "I better wait thanks!" Off they trotted to CPS but he'd already made mincemeat of their flimsy evidence. Cas dropped and released without charge, a cop did say to me that it was because I got a damn good solicitor and not just the duty one who would have just accepted a caution.
@@thetruth9210 You get the initial consultation and Police dealings free. If they are good it won't go to court so no charge. That is why you MUST get an experienced solicitor.
I had two officers come round to my house because I said something in the letters page of my local newspaper. They said it was concerning my comments about travellers. I asked them what I said (because I knew I hadn't said anything unlawful). They didn't know as they hadn't read it. They left after five minutes.
That would be one of those crime, not crime, thought crimes that will show up on a criminal records check and is reliant on the potential employer reading all of the record to reveal it isn't a crime or criminal conviction.
Yep, fishing trip in the hope you would give them a reason to arrest you .
I remember that a few years ago, some travellers turned up with their caravans in a green space near our home. That weekend, 2 houses were burgled and a car was stolen. No prize in guessing who was responsible.
But anything saidvagainst the traveller community is now racism, because they are now treated as an ethnic group. So the police were probably obliged to talk to you because all reports of racism need to be investigated to comply with equality laws, etc.
@@thetruth9210 poland the place to be ?
That's hilarious!
Also, the duty solicitors are in and out of the police station all the time, they and the police are often friends.
Get your own solicitor.
Yes they are . Never use a duty Solicitor for that reason.
Same with translators
Yep but you have to sell a kidney to afford one in these circumstances.
Get a good solicitor at the station and don't say anything until then! Don't be aggressive or nasty about, try to stay on their good side and just wait and keep your gob shut.
The best lines I was taught in business school if being detained or issued a ticket. 'I will put you on notice that I will cooperate with you fully by means of a written statement after seeking legal advice'!
Get the ticket or get arrested. keep your mouth shut, be professional. Dont say you know the law. Demonstrate you know the law by being quiet.
Most lawyers worth their salt won't even let you talk to the police in a formal interview. They will accept questions and draft a written statement to address the police's concerns after.
you are under know obligation to communicate with the police accept for grounds of identification where relevant.
I have been told by an officer friend, NEVER speak to a police person! Always get legal advice. NEVER speak to the law without representation. Even if you are innocent.
*ESPECIALLY if you are innocent
The most foolish thing a person can say is "well, I'm innocent, so nothing bad can come from talking about it". Bad bad choice.
Firstly, no one knows they are innocent. No one even knows how many laws exist. How can anyone possibly know if they're innocent of every possible offence?
Secondly, an innocent person could give information that is misconstrued or misunderstood
I know a copper and he has said the same to me.
But what happens if a friend of yours is murdered and you have information about who you suspect killed them ?
@@catman2629 there is this new thing called the internet and the newspapers and the emails and the mobile phone and they let you disseminate information anonymously
@@catman2629 immediately seek advice of a lawyer and use him to issue a statement to the police sharing what you know.
If this is mishandled they may turn on you without you knowing and you could become a suspect unknowingly. It's happened before. It will happen again
When I was a police officer,the caution was “Do you wish to say anything?You are not obliged to say anything unless you wish to do so,but anything you do say will be written down and may be given in evidence”Straight forward especially the not obliged to say anything. Then it changed,I am not typing it out but now it clearly infers that if you say nothing a judge or jury will disbelieve anything you say in court. What’s the point of giving someone the right to say nothing then effectively punishing them for exercising that right?In the military I was trained to resist interrogation so I would be inclined to look at the floor and keep repeating my name rank and number.
The first thing that all cops tell their wives, husbands and children when they are contacted by Police is to NEVER TALK TO POLICE. The ONLY interest that Police have in talking to you is to assess your guilt and determine if they can charge you. It really is that simple. Shut up or pay the price.
As a motorist stopped by uniformed police, ( they took umbrage because I refused to join them in their car so they could check my I.D.) How far do I have to obey their orders. They called for assistance who proceeded to examine the vehicle, bodywork, tyres e.t.c. I was then told to turn on my lights, indicators screen washers, wipers and various other instruments. Do I have to assist them to incriminate me?
Thanks Mr Blackbelt for your expertise. Advice duly noted.
Can I mention something unrelated I have a bit of knowledge about? I can't help noticing whoever hung your gate has put the hinges on the wrong side as the diagonal braces are designed to be in compression. Usually you order a left or right hung gate or get loose braces which can be installed either way.
A gate hung such as yours will begin to sag over time and not last very long.
best comment ever
I need a new garden type door
Oh Captain, my Captain.
I never knew that. You learn something new every day! 🙂👍
@@stonemason4902 I also need a new gate or move the existing one to the boundary of the property - so that police cannot enter on suspicion that a suspect they might be looking to arrest for an indictable offence is within.
They can't kick the door down unless they have reason to believe the suspect is within - if they can't see in to the back garden or through any of the windows, (and you have a nice big CCTV camera pointing at them with a big red light showing it's recording), they will go away and have to get a warrant.
this is so true cap x
I believe I said this many videos ago. The police are not to be trusted, and I think someone should tell them what their job actually is, at least make sure it is a solicitor, and not a paralegal, preferably a solicitor you know. Don't think the fact that you are totally innocent is a defence, because it isn't..
If the police are questioning you they’re on a fishing trip and are not your friend. They’re looking for you to incriminate yourself. The police will even take what you say out of context to use against you. Remember you have the right to remain silent and it can’t be seen as a sign of guilt. You don’t have to prove anything, the burden of proof is on the police.
The police are never your friends , full stop.
You live in the past! If you fail to mention when questioned something you later want to rely on in court as your defence or even just a part of it, if you don't tell the police the judge will tell the jury that if they are satisfied they can say to themselves "He didn't have an answer/defence at the time and he's subsequently made one up!" That's a disaster. Wait, see a solicitor, get disclosure so you know what you're being accused of in detail, then answer questions or make a written statement.
@@johnmarsh2078 only if you are arrested - the "we just want a chat" is always fishing...
@@johnmarsh2078 If you talk to them and fail to mention something, then yes. That's why you don't talk to them... How difficult is this to understand? 😂
The Police have a duty to investigate offences or suspected offences, that starts with asking questions. The likelihood of an officer seeking to fit someone up is extremely remote, they simply are not looking to prosecute innocent people despite what you think or the media want to portray.
BlackBeltBarrister I'm sure that I can say for myself as well as all your subscribers that were really thankful for all the useful information that you have provided us. We really appreciate the time and effort you take to make these videos. 👏
Hear Hear!
He's extremely good. He does tend to state things from an idealistic "lawyer" perspective and doesn't seem to realise that there's "lore and law", i.e. the police often don't act as the law states, but he still makes some very good points in his videos.
Your not speaking for me. He has took the bar and is the enemy. You should watch lawful rebellion &depts channel for the facts!
Whilst not disagreeing with I’d suggest that the Police’s job is just to gather evidence to prosecute you, not to determine what happened. Just like the rest of the legal system, the police do not exist for justice. If they can gather enough ‘evidence” to make a case that a 90 year old woman beat up a gang of teenagers despite the fact she was wheelchair bound and abroad at the time they would. You can see the way they work with the investigation into the parties at 10 Downing Street. Each was a separate offence and each will be investigated separately. That way they can improve their “clear up” rate.
Wrong. Coronavirus breaches don’t count as recorded or detected crime.
Trevor. The Police do gather evidence but they also need to understand what happened in relation to how the offence occurred, i.e are there any other offenders to locate as a result of further information.
@@jonmartin_again So Boris did not commit any crime , but will probably lose his job anyway, because Starmer wants it .
What a BS example.
@@A2Z1Two3 lying to Parliament should see him go
Over 20 years ago in my early 20's I was arrested and charged with a fraud. I had been on a bit of a crime spree a few years before and had learned my ways.. In the past I had always been very upfront and admitted what I done when presented with the evidence against me! This arrest for fraud was a complete misunderstanding, I was comple innocent. Anyway I got all the way to crown court, my barrister intertigated me to find out if I done it, and then my barrister went to the bench spoke to the judge and judge ordered the jury to find me not guilty on a legal technicality. 18 months of hell was over wondering if I would be found guilty. It really did give me faith in the legal system. The biggest mistake was not getting a duty solicitor. I didn't get a solicitor because I was under the wrong impression that getting a solicitor would make me look guilty. It's the same as not talking to police it does not make you look guilty. If you ever get arrested. Do not talk and get a solicitor. Also the police will tell your solicitor a bit more about what evidence they have against you!
Sound advice. Comments agree: say nothing to police. Use a trusted solicitor. Never go voluntarily to police station. If arrested give only your name and address. Tell police you are using your right to remain silent and will not be responding to any questions in interview. If you have a trusted solicitor present still remain silent. You could discuss with a solicitor in private wether to present a written statement. This would usually only be if you have a strong alibi.
This is great advice. Stay silent. Don't be railroaded into thinking it makes you look guilty. If they arrest you as a scare tactic to wear you down still stay silent. Duty solicitors work closely with the police and some if not most will tell you to plead guilty or get worse punishment. Not always the best advice, They don't want to spend time on a case that creates little income so if you plead guilty it's a quick slam dunk. I know many solicitors who employ ex cops to work on these cases and they almost always try to get a guilty plea or they won't take the case forward. Justice is for the wealthy
So stay silent not even say no comment in the interview?
@@madinahpaak1 ,say nothing
@@ianhandforth5672 Say nothing. No comment is an admission that you heard the question. They then might say you looked shocked or guilty for the recording about a certain question and will draw an inference from your reaction.
Close your eyes and pretend to be asleep.
Duty solicitors do not work closely with the Police. It is nothing more than a game to them, they want to get you off with an offence because it's a win for them. Doesn't matter if it's morally right or not, it's their job.
@@SuperBobbster How long have you been in the Police then?
I had my eyes opened years ago when on a jury. I had naively believed the old adage if you are innocent you should have nothing to worry about. The case against the guy was very thin, paper thin in fact, but they chanced their arm anyway. Luckily the judge was on his toes and read them the riot act over it. This was before the CPS so I don't know if they have raised their standards since then.
They haven't.
If anything. Standards are lower.
The CPS cover up crime, ask Keir Starmer about his time running the CPS.
The law is a game, nothing else. It's not fair or just.
It's a durty game but if you know the rules... It's easy
@@evelghostrider They keep changing the rules and the referee is biased, and you have to pay to play with better players at better venues with better refs
So , what we are saying is the police are out just to "stitch you up " ?
Sadly that seems to be the case.
it's a very muddled video
The Police are nothing but investigators and reporters. It's a job. Nothing more. They have no other function other than to find someone, anyone, that will fit the profile of the crime, in the cheapest and most timeous way possible. True guilt mostly does not matter. This is evidenced by the countless number of innocents sent to jail or the gallows over the years and yet still continue to be falsely convicted based on their lies. They are stats driven by high-pressure, time constrictive demands from supervisors that rode that wave and are now on top and are able to do the demanding. Beyond a particular rank, Police become more political than legal. This is where the greatest Police crimes happen.
First thing you should say when they press record in the interview room
Is please dont hit me again officer..
LOL
And this all goes back to the wonderful Magna Carta. Clause 38 (in the modern translation) says “no official shall place a man on trial upon his own unsupported statement, without producing credible witnesses to the truth of it.” In other words, you do not have to prove you are innocent, the Police (on behalf of the Crown) have to prove that you are guilty - hence anything other than "No comment" is helping them, not you.
What a shame it is that our police are not interested in fairness or truth, I can only assume that they are a rather strange set of people who care only for their careers, and on the quiet enjoy using power to further injustice while looking virtuous to those not aware of their real nature - because it is their actual character, not 'just doing the job', that is responsible. I was brought up on friendly old Dixon Of Dock Green, which looking back was propaganda even then.
You missed out abusing their powers and inventing happenings and laws to satisfy their hurt ego's if someone doesn't lick their boots to their liking
@@sahhull Indeed, but to enumerate all their negative attributes would be a long essay....
No no. You need to go back inside so I can try to work out what’s on your ceiling and how that room works. I’m not ready for other parts of the house yet
The example I was given was being asked where you were at a certain time. You, based on your daily routine, answer "I was at home at 6pm on Wednesday". However, you simply forgot that on that particular night you had been running late and at 6pm, you were actually seen on the CCTV of the local garage, where unbeknown to you, the offense occurred. When this evidence is presented conflicting with your story, you are immediately discredited as a witness and if you are the defendant, your solicitor has his work cut out.
"I was probably at home at 6pm on Wednesday".
@@davidellis1079 No, do not answer.
You are wise.
@@davidellis1079 You are probably the perpetrator.
If they have enough evidence they will arrest you, if they are questioning you then they are fishing. You cannot talk yourself out of an arrest
Don’t say ANYTHING! Take your 24hour little holiday then leave ✌️
NEVER TALK TO THE POLICE/NEVER SPEAK TO THE POLICE. ALWAYS RECORD AND VIDEOTAPE YOUR ENCOUNTER WITH THE POLICE. SIMPLE AS THAT
REMEMBER THE POLICE ARE VERY BENT/ DISHONEST AND CORRUPT. THEY WILL SAY ANYTHING TO U TO INCRIMINATE YOURSELF.U MUST BE VERY CAREFUL WHEN DEALING WITH THE POLICE
REMEMBER THAT THE POLICE CAN PUT YOU IN ALOT OF TROUBLE.BECAREFUL WHEN DEALING WITH THESE PUBLIC SERVANTS.EVEN IF YOU ARE INNOCENT OR GUILTY
Important channel, I’m a normal middle class guy with no record, and yet I was taken to court and pleaded guilty and was totally exonerated; over a hair brained case that the prosecution said was ‘weird’ ….thanks again.
It's sad. I want to trust the police.
Having subscribed to the channel "Police Abusing Powers", I can no longer do so.
'If slaughterhouses had glass walls we'd all be vegetarian'
@@jedross2136 I've worked in a slaughter house. I still eat meat.
I like meat.
@@sahhull I believe every animal I've eaten will have a chance at revenge in the afterlife.
Different strokes for different folks.
great video...
there is a video on TH-cam of an emerican lawyer giving a speach to I think his students of why you should never talk to the police and what you say can be twisted into incriminate you... very interesting watch...
th-cam.com/video/d-7o9xYp7eE/w-d-xo.html
Regent University School of Law
Don't Talk to the Police
th-cam.com/video/d-7o9xYp7eE/w-d-xo.html
Watch the whole video, especially when the ex-cop tells you to NEVER talk to Police.
I've watched it if it's the one by James Duane, everyone should watch it if it is. th-cam.com/video/d-7o9xYp7eE/w-d-xo.html
Some solicitors are woeful. Never trust a duty solicitor. Just keep quiet in interview.
Daniel
A very good afternoon
Good to see your taking time to rest, albeit it a short one.
I personally have never been stopped and questioned by Police other than two speeding tickets and an occasion whereby I was asked my details back in 1978 because synchro had gone in first gear on my Mini 1275, he asked me to blow in the tube and when negative, proceeded to ask me loads of questions on my education, my vocation, address etc etc, the only other occasion was on 2007 when in my 300C when I crossed the traffic lights as it turned to Amber, the PC was 90 degrees to my near side so couldn’t possibly of seen my actual traffic light, he followed me and blue lighted to pull me over, he was quite aggressive but I stood my ground but remained respectful, he accused me of being an “Amber Gambler” and because l said to him he was mistaken he said to me “he hadn’t got the time to argue with the likes of me” and promptly drove off!
The information contained within your video presentation is most beneficial and useful to know although hopefully, we won’t need to use it!
I would imagine the police love the fact a top Barrister is making Joe Public aware of the law!
My respect goes out to you.
Best
You were lucky I was stopped and told I'd run a stop sign. I hadn't. He eventually after a verbal spar agreed I'd stopped but saud I'd failed to apply my hand brake so I was ticketed. When I questioned that being a law he insisted it was. So I said I'd fight it. He said it's my word against yours and so you'll lose because I will say you didn't stop. I paid the fine two days wages. If it fought it it would have been 3 days wages for taking a day off work. So no I don't trust the police. I reported him but they wouldn't accept the complaint as they said Id admitted fault.
@@judithmatthews8460 pity that Daniel wasn’t around at the time!
A very well-known solicitor once advised me to carry his card at all times in my wallet and produce it and respond that I'm happy to answer any and all questions on the proviso my solicitor is present. Anyone who knows anyone in the police will tell you the one and ONLY measure of performance when officers apply for promotions is their arrest vs conviction rates. If you willingly allow yourself to be engaged in conversation with them, you are inviting entrapment, coercion & the inference you may have done something wrong. Personally I trust the police about as far as I can spit and I absolutely refuse any conversation, enquiry or "chat" they want to have. I don't care if they ask me for the time, I'm not talking to them under any circumstances.
How many times have you been arrested and why ?
@@catman2629 once, for refusing to answer questions. Received a rather generous compensation payout once my solicitor pursued it via the IOPC. Just because someone mistrusts the police doesn't automatically make them a criminal.
Police officer: "I'm detaining you because you're under investigation for suspicious activity"
Auditor: "What crime do you suspect me of committing?"
Police officer: "That's what I am investigating. What are you doing here?"
Auditor: "That's what I am investigating. What are you doing here?"
Police officer: "I'm investigating suspicious activity, what's your name?"
Auditor: "I'm investigating suspicious activity, what's your name?"
Police officer: "I don't have to give you my name. Have you got any I.D. on you?"
Auditor: "I don't have to give you my name. Have you got any I.D. on you?"
...and so on...
When will they get the message?
You're going to look like an idiot when it's played to the jury.
When arrested the only thing you're allowed to say is: "I want three sugars in my tea."
TBH, if I were ever arrested I'd first ask for refreshments, then ask for note taking materials, then ask all officers for all their details and painstakingly write them down, then spend hours with my lawyer, then for each question I would reply, "I will answer through my lawyer," and my lawyer would say "no comment."
Not all Barrister are created equal , IE there was Once up on a time certain Solicitor’s were Fast tracked to Barrister status ( they are still around though few in number now ) but they are potentially mines in the system , do not use them. At your own peril ....
They are like car salesmen, selling you a product you don't want. Never overestimate your ability or innocence as a guarantee of escape.
As a car salesman I’m curious to know what we sell that people don’t want?
@@JoeyBrod Nothing read my comment properly. Like you their focus is on the sale not the customer. No disrespect meant
@Tom Foster They are also target focused. Clear up rates instead of sales targets.
@@andrewfrancis3591 oh yeah none taken, I know what you mean now. Much to the annoyance of my company, I’m brutally honest to a lot of my customers, helps me sleep at night lol
@@JoeyBrod Well done, sorry for the generalisation.
Its an interesting subject where if innocent, talking to police shouldnt be an issue, however they are so hell bent on catching someone you are at risk in the corrupt police system. But lets be honest this advice is really to help stop guilty people getting caught
It’s a lot easier if you just legally refuse interview
When you don’t answer their questions they try to say your obstructing or being difficult but it’s your right to silence and they want info for their benefit not yours. No Id no information only a blank look is all I’ll give them
Never ever speak to the police say nothing not even “no comment” that’s is a reply stay silent
I once would have totally disagreed with every word you said here, but now, having once always supported the police and even very wanted to join them, I now very much agree with you.
Our police in a way have become like a military police arm of an occupying enemy that has successfully invaded us, who now no longer have any desire to be fair, decent and promote justice but just want to get their number of convictions EVEN if they know full well the person is innocent.
My poor country, so please I am old and lived in a time when we had a proper police force.
Love the bird song
Ditto - bring on the summer!
What rubbish - the Police can arrest “On suspicion” - if you are stopped when the Police Office is searching an area for someone who has just committed a crime and you say, “ No comment - I’m saying nothing” - that gives suspicion that you have been involved in the crime - because normal innocent people are usually very pleased to tell you what they were doing. This advice is designed to encourage you to use Solicitors who will make money out of your claim via the Court. My advice - if stopped by the Police and you have been acting normally - then be polite - don’t be a smart Alec - leave that to the Lawyers.
I have a learning disability that affects my communication skills to which I inform plod of immediately they spout the "caution". To a range of reactions by plod of which one is to inform (threaten)me that this will entail my being held longer. Anyhow(after 20 minutes to 5 hours) they then introduce me to an "appropriate adult". My experience with these individuals range from them working in the staff canteen (at least 1 year ESL) to earnest volunteer. On 3 occasions they "advised" me. Either way they are picked by my gaolers so I am reluctant to acknowledge their suitability. Having done my best to evaluate my appointed and finding them wanting or mid questioning they "advise" me thus blatantly inappropriate I terminate the questioning (caught on tape too) am I within my rights and will my refusal to continue affect negatively should I go to court? 👉🤔👈
"If you think the police are your friend,your mind is up your backside" The Antiterrorist
A classic example of a critical life skill you're never taught
I'm a OAP quite some time ago i was unjustly assaulted by a thug pub doorman leaving me with injured spine. the police refused to take action but instead told me if i didn't go home they would arrest me, see my post with CCTV footage
What a state the country is in when you are given this advice
Not about this video but what is the legal position of shops restaurants etc saying they don't take cash as payment? If I eat a meal and offer cash??
I was brought up to respect police. The way they behaved during the miners strike ended that. I will never forgive them for that. Now I would not pee on one who was on fire.
So was I, Miners strike, Hillsborough, Speed cameras, the list goes on! 😞
Soil you trousers, slobber, rocking back and forward, make incoherent noises, and finally sing God save the beans, usually works for an early release.
Lol 😂
That's my normal behaviour, so won't work for me.....😂
If a police officer approaches me and says he/she would like to talk to me about a possible "thing" that he/she is investigating, do I have to talk. Can I say "I dont talk to police without legal representation" and walk away. What powers does he/she have to detain me, without arrest. Can I envoke my rights to silence. What action can they then take against me. What rights do I have to be left in peace and go on my way?
Just tell them you have nothing to do with the murder.
Thank you.
If police were fair rather than trying to act like judge and jury they would not try and trick you, would not try and twist your words. All they want is an arrest of some kind, truth doesn't matter to them. Never cooperate, never help. Be polite but that is it, no talk.
"no comment"
"No comment'
"No comment"
"No comment"
all the way down
Love your video ,,,, but my cat attacked my laptop !!! She could hear the background noise birds singing . Keep up the good work
Do Police have to tell you and/or show you or your solicitor the evidence against you before their interview?
Do they have to tell you what charge they arrested you for?
In my experience, Police arrest first, then make the charge fit the witnesses' statements or CCTV 24 hours later at the interview.
What does the law say they MUST do before any interview begins?
And if the Police don't comply - can the interview be used in evidence, or is it nullified by the polce's failure to e.g.to tell you what the charge is first, or what evidence they have before the interview?
Can the jury draw an adverse inference from "no comment" in interview if the police did not comply with their obligations before the interview?
The CPS will ignore the police's failings anyway and claim to the court you gave a "no comment" interview, so how do you get the judge to tell them they can't use the no comment interview because it was invalid?
And how is a solicitor supposed to be an authority on your fitness to answer questions - they aren't doctors or mental health professionals or neurologists etc.
Most court convictions occur because the accused convicted themselves during an interview. I can't say it in a plainer fashion. NEVER talk to Police.
Anything you say can be used in evidence against you. They are not going to use it to as evidence in your favour. That's not their role, so shut up and talk to your legal advisor.
On a slightly different note. An ex-colleague of mine was once involved in a road traffic accident (or incident as it is now termed). His was by far the greatest fault. I saw him quite soon after the incident. The police were clear that they were going to charge him and take the case to court and he said that he intended to defend himself and plead guilty. I looked him squarely in the eye and said, "He who defends himself has a fool for a client". After a short discussion he decided he WOULD seek legal advice. He thanked me later and said that it was the best thing he could have done. Effectively he got a slapped wrist for a very stupid mistake - by no way was he an idiot boy racer. Legal advice may be expensive but in the long run often proves to be a damn sight cheaper!
With regards to unlawful detainment, I watched a TH-cam video a few days back from a chap called YARDLEY SKI called" handcuffed detained & searched outside Rwanda house ". Where it goes to pot is at 7:15 minutes mark. I'm seeing many uk auditors getting arrested on section 43. Police are abusing this section and their powers. It's totally ridiculous. Imo.
Abusing section 43 is the way the cops restore their hurt ego's.
No-one (correctly) gets arrested under Sec 43 Terr. Act. This section provides Police with the power to only search an individual and provides no power of arrest UNLESS they are carrying items related to terrorism (hence a crime). There is no requirement to ID under Sec 43, however, legally ignorant cops will often do so, only to be released without charge some hours later when bigger brains get involved and thus providing enough evidence for a positive civil case against the Police.
OMG 1:40 you have a magic dog it disappears for 9 seconds haha .Keep up the good informative work. Thank you.
so if the BBB addressing a guilty or innocent person here? he doesn't make it very clear
Nothing changes, if you've got something solid to use in your defense, bring it up, otherwise shut up and get legal advice.
I was a policeman
For a long time
Don’t talk to police!
Does this apply to officers questioning you on the street/ before an arrest, or an official questioning setting, or both?
Some years ago I stopped my car, got out, and asked if a Bobby that I knew needed help as he was strugling on the ground with someome. With the reply of no thankyou and with many officers running to help I exited :)
So, in effect you are stating that the police are looking to fit people up. Always said the Police were bent from day one.
Does silence implicate guilt?
Why do you advise people to make a No Comment when it should be invoking your Right To Remain Silent!
Just remember that the police will do anything to trip you up and they don't always know the difference between an act and a law!!!!!!!
There is no difference between an 'act and a law' ... The Law comes from a variety of sources.
@@Jester-Riddle Until an act is passed by parliament it is not a law but a law is always a law because it has already been established, very similar but not the same!! But a lot of police don't even know the laws let alone acts!!!
@@stigg333 You are talking rot. There is no point in referring to an Act that has not been passed by Parliament, as it is at that stage merely a proposal on a piece of paper ... The Police don't ever use 'acts' (as you denote them) that haven't been passed into Law as they are meaningless. The Police can only apply the Law, so I have no idea what rabbit hole some idiot has sent you down ...
Furthermore, for example, the Law of Tort was never a Law until it became Law via the Court System ... It wasn't Legislated into Law, but was a new development of Contract Law, although it doesn't require a Contract.
I do hope that you aren't studying Law ... because you should ask for a refund from whoever is teaching you !
@ blackbelt barrister. (I been subscribed to for a long while now and enjoy watching your videos), but this time I need some expert advice or opinion from you. I was neglected to access seeing a doctor 👨⚕️ by the reception staff in my health centre. The receptionist had no Knowledge of medical and refused to give me a appointment and told me it is not urgent & to see a dermatologist for skin instead. (After this call there was a 4 day delay as it was good Friday and then weekends and bank holiday Monday. Luckily then next day when i went to see a local boots pharmacist I was told I had a skin infection and I should have not been turned away. I am absolutely furious with the health centre reception and worried of permanent scarring on my face now. Any advice about suing? Kind regards.
That triangle spaceship hovering over his head was putting me off
Never met a broke Politician never met a poor lawyer.... met loads of skint Criminals
In the hierarchy of doubtful morality
1. Politicians
2. Lawers
3. Criminals
1:40 mysterious disappearing dog!
👀😆
NEVER SPEAK TO THE POLICE/NEVER TALK TO THE POLICE.ALWAYS RECORD AND VIDEOTAPE THE POLICE
THE POLICE ARE ALLOWED TO LIE
Sorry, I can’t hear you for the beautiful robin song 🎶
"The police know what the elements of the offence are..." watch any auditing video and you will see majority of police DONT know the law, this guy has a very optimistic view of police officers knowledge levels.
glorious blackbird song
We Nailed the Bastard Sarge, Well done Son your'll Go Far 😡
Thank you
Does this apply to those "voluntary interview" invites you may get?? What should one do if they receive one of these letters?
Ignore it. If they wanted to arrest/charge you, they would have by now. If you attend the interview you will be interrogated for several hours in order to incriminate yourself, after which you will probably be arrested and charged once the Police have got enough evidence. VIs are just fishing trips because the usually have nothing.
Generally these are for summary offense, these are generally limited to 6 months from the time of the offense allegedly took place. You can ignore these for the most part, these are just used to get confessions out of people.
It is a scare tactic. Ignore.
In my experience the "voluntary interview" is in reality "a police interview under caution" and is a tactic to get the person to come forward to attend an interview and if the person opts not to go, they will probably be arrested in order to get the interview. Its a trick to lull that person into a false sense of security so that they may incriminate themselves more easily.
If someone is asked to attend a "voluntary interview" sometimes also referred to as a "a little chat, nothing to worry about", at that point they must immediately find an independant legal advisor who will come with them to the police station.
@@BaddaBigBoom In the old book. However, the Government UK Ltd was incorporated at companies House in June 2005 then departments broken up and sold then registered at Dun & Bradstreet. American branch. Not the branch in England, either. Now owned by Walmart and others. This includes various police. So now you tell them that they and their fake pirate law courts (caughts) have no more authority than pound land staff over members of the public. Employees of private companies cannot lawfully no legally, not even with legalese, wield authority over us. Same goes for council tax (two years running mine has been written off due to their Treason, fraud, malfeasance etc.
Don't expect any solicitor or barrister to verify this. It's their income! Research it for yourself for the facts. It is also separate from 'Freeman of the Land' etc so you don't have to get involved in any of that if you don't want to. Quite simply, a privatised Home Office cannot authorise any privatised police or security company to act against anyone - who refuses to acquiesce. They cannot demand you go for interviews, arrest you with or without proof, take you to caught nor imprison you if you tell them outright they are private companies and have no authority to do so. I haven't tried it with anything beyond council tax (haven't needed to) and of course in a serious enough case such as murder they are likely to do what they do regardless of whether they have the authority. However, for lesser matters they are likely to back down rather than have people state these facts in public caught. They don't want it known so it is likely to be more expedient to let lesser matters drop - unless the officer in charge decides to be a bluddy minded pig and push his luck, in which case it would be worth rising to the challenge and stating the facts; that they are fraudulent in their fake caught/court - if physically dragged there. Then sue them under the 'laws' they choose to adhere to.
What would likely happen if you are invited to attend a voluntary interview, and officer claims they have video evidence of you throwing an object at your neighbors property during an altercation (in which they were goading you and filming despite being repeatedly told you have serious mental illnesses) but you didn't actually throw the object at them or their property but did throw the object at your own garden wall and (perhaps but not known some debris fell into their garden) no damage caused to their property.?
Can you ask what the elements of the offence are?
The sun comes out as the Claim Experts link comes up - that was almost like James Burke's space shuttle timing.
What should you do if your attempt to remain silent from the onset is met with aggressive behaviour that may be causing you alarm and distress.
You can complain to the police, who will investigate themselves and decide they did nothing wrong.
@@sahhull
It's predictable when the Barrister intends to go silent.
Ignore the threats, continue to say nothing and smile while you watch them tear themselves apart inside. Most Police are clowns and clowns love to perform.
@@colinpryor4290 Thanks..
Are there any videos with respect to the new Police Crime and Sentencing bill? Especially with regards to offensive weapons?
At what point should they caution you?
Although it wasn't in England...
I had some punk intentionally try to run me over in my own drive.
I called the cops and reported it. A uniform came by and was taking a statement. Then this hotshot in a bulletproof vest (yes, this was TX) shows up and starts hurling accusations at me. Long story short, if I didn't drop the matter, I'd get arrested. I suspect the kid or some of his gang were friends/family of the hotshot.
I used to support the police. Now I wouldn't talk to them if I witnessed a murder.
If one wishes to make a bad situation worse, call the gun and badge thugs.
@@k.chriscaldwell4141
The uniform guy was actually pretty nice. It was the hotshot in the vest that got all bolshy. As with nearly all professions, there are some good and some bad.
Getting a bad grade is one thing - getting arrested is a bit more serious.
And people think we have freedom.. all you people who think your free and have freedom think again.
A 'no comment' interview looks very suspicious because, of course, it is a common choice for guilty people. The guilty person is hoping to find out what evidence the police have so that they can invent a story that dodges around the evidence. Making a statement that proactively explains what happened as clearly as you can is a better choice for innocent, law abiding citizens. This is what the Black Belt Barrister is advising so I don't understand why this video has the title 'Why you don't talk to police'. You should talk to the police and having an expert to help you do it fully and clearly is good advice.
If you actually committed a crime then the best thing to do is confess in detail without delay and subsequently plead guilty. Do not add to your crime by wasting the resources of the justice system on your dishonest attempt to get away with it.
Discuss with your lawyer: Concoct a story. Let's be honest, it goes on, it's not about the truth or any kind of morals on behalf of a defence solicitor.
and the police never abuse their powers?
@@ThePereubu1710 - why assume they do?
@@ThePereubu1710 I don't think there's any doubt that sometimes, individual officers do abuse their powers, but it isn't the norm by any stretch of the imagination despite what the media may try to portray.
@@SuperBobbster The media don't "like to portray that police are always abusing their powers". They point out that the systems that are in place, allow these corrupt or bad actors to get away with it.
It's comparable to the whole Catholic church scandal. Of course not all priests are p*does, not even most, but the church will cover up wrongdoing so the church doesn't end up looking bad. It's the same with the police, and with politics. It is of the utmost importance to them that they don't look bad, so they will cover up and lie about wrongful behaviour rather than admit to it. Almost always when one of these awful people are dealt with, their bad behaviour was already known and covered up.
And that's why media calling it out is so important. If it were up to people like you, we'd be sliding right into a corrupt authoritarian police state, because passing off bad practice as "a problem of individuals" and demonising the press who speak out against police injustice is exactly how these societies form.
Providing a proper thought out statement about what did or didn't happened rather than giving off the cuff responses to trained interrogators in a stressful situation can't possibly be harmful to your defence if you are innocent. If you're a wrong un' though its probably better to not give them any information at all.
Getting legal advice is part of making a proper thought out statement. You need external advice from someone who knows what the law does and doesn't say.
Great advice
I say "I dont stand under you and I will not say my name as my right to stay silent and I will not contract with you".
My name is always written as :Joe of the family:Blogs