Why Nike is Facing Its Worst Performance in Years

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ย. 2024
  • Nike once dominated the sneaker market, but is currently facing a rare decline in sales. As competitors have gained ground, will Nike be able to regain its status as the top dog in sportswear?
    Subscribe to Morning Brew
    Sign up for free today: www.morningbre...
    Follow The Brew!
    Instagram - / morningbrew
    Twitter - / morningbrew
    Tik Tok - / morningbrew

ความคิดเห็น • 2.6K

  • @Sean_neaS
    @Sean_neaS 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3235

    For a sports shoe you need consistency and Nike doesn't have that. You buy a shoe and you like, then you go back for replacements and either the shoe isn't made anymore or you buy the same shoe and the quality is completely trashed.

    • @ryanjoseph.51
      @ryanjoseph.51 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +111

      also have the most inconsistent shoe sizing
      same model, same size, different fit... like what???
      my main sport is running and aside from alphafly and vaporfly, the other lineup are poor in quality... most notable is the zoomx foam getting busted from what users criticize
      bought one and never purchasing from this brand again... overhyped, overpriced, trash tier quality
      there are better options out there... don't get fooled by their aggressive marketing

    • @sitha4441
      @sitha4441 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      100%

    • @ihorv44
      @ihorv44 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Nike is the fashion brand. There is no need to produce for many years one model. Each year Nike gives a new generation which has much higher perfomance. I am ultramarathon runner and I have been wore Pegasus for last 7 years and I fully satysfy with evolution. Yes, Pegasus 35, 36 were awful, the 37 had bad durability but 33, 34, 38, 40 were amaizing. Hope new Pegasus 41 will be have such cool perfomance as it looks. In my opinion, the biggest drawback of the current Nike Running is the lack of T-shirts in the right colours to match the shoes. Because wearing a black T-shirt all the time is so boring

    • @TheJoe89jan
      @TheJoe89jan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@ryanjoseph.51actually, Adidas has the worse inconsistent size fitting

    • @DanielHomeImprovement
      @DanielHomeImprovement 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      much worse quality in these last 5 or 7 years plus their shitty DEI politics .

  • @ShumaBot
    @ShumaBot 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1800

    I've pretty much abandoned Nikes for running shoes. They wear down so incredibly fast. It's a fashion brand pretending to be a sports shoe. They're just badly made fast fashion.

    • @mattcannon2
      @mattcannon2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      The move to foam bottoms just means they wear down quickly when you use them outdoors

    • @gicardee6756
      @gicardee6756 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      you obviously are too broke to try the vaporflys which has a clear physical advantage and was banned in some competition. you dont know what youre talking about, cringe

    • @klipk7296
      @klipk7296 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +162

      @@gicardee6756 Most people don't shop in this price category, I doubt that's the category of shoes the other person was talking about

    • @JevonDS
      @JevonDS 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      What performance basketball shoes would you recommend? Between Nike Basketball and Jordan Brand, they pretty much run the market there.

    • @romanizaboss6641
      @romanizaboss6641 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

      Hoka and other brands dominate the running scene especially trail running/ ultras… Nike just can’t compete!

  • @skenzyme81
    @skenzyme81 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4933

    Nike shoes are *way too expensive* given their middling to poor quality. The way Nikes are made, they should cost 40% less. Add in the bad vibes from their sweat shop abuse, and Nikes should cost 60% less. Never again, Nike.

    • @MrFoof82
      @MrFoof82 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +188

      It's why I always buy the "out of season" ones I like when they're marked down to $35-40/pair.

    • @frikkied2638
      @frikkied2638 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

      You have quite strong feelings about Nike 😂

    • @bfrost7
      @bfrost7 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +117

      exactly, they're made of majority plastic and cheap materials and they don't last long. i'd rather just spend more money on quality shoes, leather shoes, then nikes.

    • @frikkied2638
      @frikkied2638 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +86

      @@bfrost7 some nice leather running shoes? 😂

    • @Chicago48
      @Chicago48 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      There are too many skus.

  • @derbaerlie2816
    @derbaerlie2816 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +863

    As a German, the switch from Adidas to Nike of the German national soccer team is the biggest betrayal on earth.

    • @Illumirage
      @Illumirage 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

      Agree, but so was when Adidas espoused BLM solidarity in 2020

    • @Rockstarclub95
      @Rockstarclub95 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂

    • @stephm4047
      @stephm4047 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yep, I could not believe it. 😮

    • @219tochi3
      @219tochi3 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      @@stephm4047 whats even more offensive is watching soccer

    • @yashmetha1232
      @yashmetha1232 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Well Abibas has it on MLS so why can't Nike do it for your poor soccer team

  • @johnnyblue1101
    @johnnyblue1101 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    Problem is clear as day to me: I paid 80 bucks for walking shoes that I can’t wear comfortably due to poor quality.
    They hurt my feet.
    Paid half that for Skechers with zero problem.
    Who’s minding this store?
    CEO is stealing money.
    Founder is beyond arrogant and delusional

  • @bradarnold7834
    @bradarnold7834 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +428

    Oh wow, they got rid of the guy rooted in the product and culture and replaced him with a tech bro and it hasn’t gone well? SHOCKER!!

    • @AMVmushroom
      @AMVmushroom 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      Steve Jobs talked about this problem 20 years ago and nobody's learned anything

    • @AlekseyFilippovHuzzah
      @AlekseyFilippovHuzzah หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Arrogance, Avarice

    • @bassyey
      @bassyey หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tech bros are stupidest of the bunch lol.

    • @rmkensington
      @rmkensington 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Fucking nailed it

    • @drewdrewson1384
      @drewdrewson1384 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@AMVmushroom I heard so many people say that apple was done when he died and Tim Cook replaced him since Tim had no creativity. It now has a market cap of 3.3 trillion. Is not so simple as muhhh just pick someone who loves the product.

  • @northerncardinalstudios
    @northerncardinalstudios 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1847

    Re-releasing 90s designs and cutting down on toe space sure is innovative...

    • @serafinacosta7118
      @serafinacosta7118 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Clever.

    • @mfspectacular
      @mfspectacular 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      what? Those 90s shoes had slimmer, sloped toes, less space 😂 The stuff theyre putting out nowadays is raised up & square shaped, to the point where the sizing on their shoes is completely screwed vs years back

    • @Secretlyanothername
      @Secretlyanothername 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Boomer shoes

    • @QuiGonJeans
      @QuiGonJeans 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think you just got fat. I’m 37 and have been wearing Nike as far back as I can remember, and if anything, their shoes are more comfortable now…

    • @dudea3378
      @dudea3378 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

      They're still too narrow at the toes 😢 ​@@mfspectacular

  • @johnnys8691
    @johnnys8691 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +274

    Nike thinks they are the premium brand and producers expensive shoes, while other brands give same quality or better at a low price. I haven't bought Nike in years now.

    • @tanu5401
      @tanu5401 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What do you wear now ?

    • @user-hq2jl6sm1n
      @user-hq2jl6sm1n 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      @@tanu5401See most people wearing new balance now.

    • @Navy2711
      @Navy2711 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Puma and New Balance for me!

    • @apa8201
      @apa8201 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Bad quality. I like brooks, anta or asics

    • @Navy2711
      @Navy2711 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@apa8201 you talking about both puma and New balance?

  • @FunNHonesty
    @FunNHonesty 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +123

    Shoes are uglier, quality trash, colors are ridiculous, celebrities power dying, Jordan retro are played out, reseller market is huge, tech underwhelming, and they never have any dam shoes in the store.

    • @PatrickArcato
      @PatrickArcato 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Their clothing also have nothing but their icon on them, zero design, besides for the ultra expensive models

    • @dannydaw59
      @dannydaw59 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Every Nike shoe I've worn makes a gross squishy sound after stepping into a puddle. Other brands never did that.

  • @johncitizen5377
    @johncitizen5377 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +279

    People hate downloading apps. They are sick of having an app for everything.

    • @realDunalTrimp
      @realDunalTrimp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Tell me about I only keep the essential apps on my devices.

    • @liam3284
      @liam3284 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      It costs data, storage and battery, and usually annoys you with notifications.

    • @onemorechris
      @onemorechris 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      2019 was not the time to be pushing people to apps.

    • @seansingh4421
      @seansingh4421 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@liam3284 also personal data privacy concerns

  • @pinkimietz3243
    @pinkimietz3243 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +511

    Nikes quality is just not where it should be. Awful sneakers. Cheapo yet expensive.

    • @skyrokket5619
      @skyrokket5619 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      AN AIR MAX I WOULD LIKE TO WEAR BULLDOG AND A RUNNER ALL FUCKED MY REEBOKS HELD UP SUCH A WASTE OF MONEY

    • @FloydWhoElseTV
      @FloydWhoElseTV 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Unless you are buying them for running, nobody really cares about the quality. It's always been about style. There best sellers are sneakers they keep bringing back from the dead. Jordans

    • @backpackpepelon3867
      @backpackpepelon3867 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@FloydWhoElseTVthat's another reason of their low performance in market now. Those who worships Jordan enough to buy the brands even its crappy is slowly getting old and one day, will become the minority. Even Li-ning is better than Nike now in term of quality, which is crazy considering they are a new players in sneakers market.

    • @madmaxiemartialartsnerd485
      @madmaxiemartialartsnerd485 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FloydWhoElseTV here is the flaw in what you said, nike HEAVILY markets itself as a "SPORTS" shoe, good for basketball and running, yet even on casual play they fall apart so easy. Now while the majority of people aren't athletes or even hobbyiests, word of mouth spreads fast among the internet.
      So when the majority of Hobbyiest athletes and pro athletes are dissing the fuck out of nike products, the casual consumer listens

    • @JABelms
      @JABelms 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@backpackpepelon3867 I have Jordans that are 20+ year old so the popularity is warranted, it has nothing to do with lessening quality, it's about NIKE creating designs that have way too many parts and breakpoints. Jordan 4s are not different from the supposed high quality 4s made in the 90s or whatever, they are all the same have the durability of Lego because of how they are designed. You can buy SB Dunks today and those are practically indestructible because of how they are made

  • @M4NA5
    @M4NA5 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +305

    The recent rise of New Balance and Asics in addition to new entrants like On Running have thoroughly exposed Nike in terms of their sub-par quality.

    • @albertgallanosa8600
      @albertgallanosa8600 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Hoka Trail Runners

    • @mike60521x
      @mike60521x 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      a few years ago - new balance were called old man shoes - price and fit is all that matters

    • @jonmccormick8683
      @jonmccormick8683 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@mike60521x New Balance is big in Japan.

    • @eng3d
      @eng3d 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      all of them are still expensive, and their quality is still plastic grade

    • @dmitriyobidin6049
      @dmitriyobidin6049 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Even Ant, man... Even them have a better quality.

  • @nickskier1
    @nickskier1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1041

    Same thing we are seeing in many companies like Boeing. Replacing CEOS that had backgrounds in the developing the product they sell, with just business/managment/sales focused people that only want to make money and don't give a shit about the product.

    • @userunknown7675
      @userunknown7675 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

      It's not just the new CEO. Quallity was already going down the drain.
      But the new one really fucked them by going direct to consumer and cutting out the middleman without actually doing all the work that comes with building their own sales channels. It really gave exsisting retailers a reason to diversify and have a couple of other brands on their shelves in order to not get fucked if nike decides to pull their contract.
      That change really showcases how shit those shoes are in the mid price range.

    • @prashanthb6521
      @prashanthb6521 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Very true.

    • @wokethelast8498
      @wokethelast8498 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      I agree, these American companies only think about the short term!

    • @KarenNg0909
      @KarenNg0909 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

      100% this. Boeing used to be quality when it was run by aviation experts and pilots, then it sold out .
      Nike used to be run by a runner / shoe designer and now its run by a tech bro. these brands used to mean a certain level of quality, but now its all markup and lies.

    • @ralphpal
      @ralphpal 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      They went nonunion

  • @dr.woozie7500
    @dr.woozie7500 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    The fact that there are Chinese factories pumping out the same exact shoe for 1/3 of the price means that Nike shouldn't be charging us $200 for shoes... the Nike fakes industry is huge.

    • @dartisone
      @dartisone 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Which one do you recommend? Im tired with nike scammers

    • @Habib_Osman
      @Habib_Osman หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Which brand tell me?

    • @Habib_Osman
      @Habib_Osman หลายเดือนก่อน

      I smell a BS claim. But.. if you can provide the brand you mean I'd be interested.

    • @dr.woozie7500
      @dr.woozie7500 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Habib_Osman look up LJR batch Jordans.

    • @pierrehahn64
      @pierrehahn64 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Look out for them it's mostly on Taobao

  • @notorioustori
    @notorioustori 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +807

    Lower quality, exploit workers, "techify" inventory & sales, keep prices in lockstep with inflation. They left the door open for newcomers to come and take the throne.

    • @Spidey_Ethan
      @Spidey_Ethan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      Not surprised. I’ve personally been unimpressed with Nike quality for a long time. Unless it’s a specialty shoe (football, track, etc), then it’s just a hard pass.

    • @duuhwinning6589
      @duuhwinning6589 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Puma has been impressing recently !!

    • @iuruoy-shao
      @iuruoy-shao 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Plus, the controversies around how they treated their female athlete brand representatives.

    • @check2000
      @check2000 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@iuruoy-shaonobody gives a damn about female athletes

    • @edgarLV
      @edgarLV 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My wife was working in one of Nike's factory. And they have new factory in my wife's town.
      She and no one is complaining. Salary is average for the region. Work conditions quite good compared to other options.

  • @davianoinglesias5030
    @davianoinglesias5030 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +786

    They shifted to maximizing shareholder value instead of making shoes

    • @userunknown7675
      @userunknown7675 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Yeah, in 2020 they went digital in order to be vallued as a tech company and right now they push volume (discounts be damned). 10 years ago I rarely saw big discounts on nike shoed. Right now half the nike shoes are discounted at major retailers and these retailers seem to be carrying new brands that occupy nike's price point as well.
      And that should scare nike because it tells you that the stores are aware of how fickle nike is and that their customers either want a better quallity shoe in the 100-150 range or a similar quallity shoe but non brand in the 35-60 range.

    • @bubba842
      @bubba842 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      That's been the western financial system for the last 40 years.
      It's also another reason why tax revenues are down. Dividends are not classed as revenue for the company. This means that the companies have a lower tax bill every year.
      The money that paid to shareholders should have been taxed at the corporate tax rate if it was classed as revenue, though when given to a shareholder the shareholder gets taxed at the capital of gains tax rate, which is usually lower.
      This is tax reduction has probably counted for trillions of dollars in lost revenue over the past 40 years.
      It's a scam, but everyone seems to turn a blind eye to it.

    • @Walker956
      @Walker956 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      are you dumb? how is making customers unhappy, "maximizing shareholder value"? stocks going down. yeah sure. fucking idi0t

    • @sadisticD
      @sadisticD 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      That simple yet sad statement explains the basic plot of most companies that have gone backwards these days.

    • @孫悟空-f9b
      @孫悟空-f9b 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      That’s the literally the goal of a company though, to maximise shareholder value…

  • @tjm_tk
    @tjm_tk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +166

    nike has found a way to piss off every segment of their consumer base lol. sneakerheads hate the snkrs app and the whole draw/limited release system, people who just want normal shoes hate how overpriced they are.

    • @mickeybeavison1053
      @mickeybeavison1053 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Go woke go broke

    • @grod805
      @grod805 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@mickeybeavison1053 dumb

    • @grod805
      @grod805 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Yeah. Completely agree. I want to buy a pair of shoes not a collectors item. I gave up on them because they want to create these exclusive drops, etc. I have other stuff to do with my life than wait for a shoe to be released

    • @RK-um9tu
      @RK-um9tu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ​@@mickeybeavison1053Please name a company functioning like it is still the 1950s? You can't because they are all out of business😂😂😂

    • @misbegotten3508
      @misbegotten3508 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RK-um9tu If you're American, you have no idea how incredibly stupid you sound. Hell, fine. Barbasol. And there's ten more in the back that go as far back as 1890s.
      Dumb as hell. America's had stores since forever.

  • @amberpayne5150
    @amberpayne5150 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Started buying NB years ago after my $100 pair of Nike fell apart after one month of light usage.

  • @vadergrd
    @vadergrd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +260

    my problem with nike is that they went for a more narrower shoe model ... and they are not comfortable anymore ...

    • @standingmaximumverticaljump
      @standingmaximumverticaljump 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Funny thing is...Now the barefoot shoe sector of the shoe industry has risen. Wide toe box, drop zero ration, and low to the ground (little to zero cushioning). This doesn't help that the marketing of those barefoot shoes are based on natural foot pattern and not fancy tech (which is what Nike is about).

    • @amysourbutts8421
      @amysourbutts8421 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's why I prefer Brooks.

    • @JohnyDoe9
      @JohnyDoe9 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Glad to hear I am not alone here. I used to wear some of their models years ago, but then, all of a sudden, my feet could no longer fit into ANY of their shoes (width-wise) no matter what. Been wearing Sketchers and other brands ever since.

    • @rommelchinas4593
      @rommelchinas4593 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Same opinion here. I normally use barefoot shoes. Every now and then I use my ON shoes merely for its design

    • @RT-qz5ci
      @RT-qz5ci 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Same. The shoes are so narrow I can’t wear them anymore. Wide shoes are waaaay too wide.

  • @yodatscrazy981
    @yodatscrazy981 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    Reasons why Nike is failing
    1. Over reliance on brand name
    2. Much cheaper replica sneaker becoming more accessible
    3. Ugly/Mediocre quality footwear
    4. Boomer CEO Tech/NFT sales strategy (that always fails)
    In general they are becoming ridiculously arrogant with the large marketshare they have, they expect that people will pay top dollar for anything that has a swoosh and they have pushed their luck so far that they are now having people walk away from the brand. Doesn’t help that sneakerheads are finally pivoting from the expensive shoes to good looking shoes. Scarcity won’t make up for an ugly product anymore and Nike needs to catch on to that.

    • @KallusGarnet
      @KallusGarnet 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They went woke now they go

    • @leonrobinson8180
      @leonrobinson8180 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@KallusGarnet Broke? Like Black Panther and House of the Dragon? Shut it Fox News!

    • @Imdan92
      @Imdan92 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@leonrobinson8180nice. picking the only 2 woke products to ever be sucessful
      Have you had a look at the LOTR adaptions recently? What about Star Wars?

    • @DELTACO..UBERDRIVER..STOCKS..
      @DELTACO..UBERDRIVER..STOCKS.. 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      it's the boomers talking the .most shit on this comment section

  • @welitoang
    @welitoang 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +123

    Air jordans are uncomfortable asf. Shoe quality feels cheap

    • @rebel4721
      @rebel4721 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      I don’t understand the allure of those shoes. All the “special editions” are just different color ways

    • @ineverswag
      @ineverswag 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      @@rebel4721 the allure is the cool design and the man bearing the name.

    • @PinoyAbnoy
      @PinoyAbnoy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@rebel4721 i still havent owned air jordans as a 1986 born millennial

    • @FloydWhoElseTV
      @FloydWhoElseTV 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Nobody buys air Jordans for performance. Lol

    • @Romeo_Mar22
      @Romeo_Mar22 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@PinoyAbnoygood keep it up

  • @aucontraire1986
    @aucontraire1986 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Nike has a really bad quality problem.

  • @chrisredd214
    @chrisredd214 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +556

    The shoes are cheap crap at this point. I don’t want to buy them because they are cheap crap.

    • @marnungsangimsong4619
      @marnungsangimsong4619 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Nike is not cheap lol
      Here in India a Nike original costs 10k rupees.

    • @Limbicdrips
      @Limbicdrips 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

      He’s saying the quality is cheap not what they cost. Expensive crap made with cheap materials.

    • @carlzune6626
      @carlzune6626 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Wish at least the price corresponded to the quality...

    • @curlyhairdudeify
      @curlyhairdudeify 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@marnungsangimsong4619 Learn to read in America "CheapCrap" means an expensive item of low quality.

    • @alice_agogo
      @alice_agogo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@marnungsangimsong4619I'm from PH 🇵🇭 lots of nouveau riche more ans here as well who love Nike

  • @kaunas88
    @kaunas88 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +220

    Lots of folks will always want to buy shoes in person to find out if they really fit or not. That cannot be done online.

    • @ralphpal
      @ralphpal 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Also out of sight out of mind.

    • @MHWGamer
      @MHWGamer 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      this 100%
      I am more or less a genZ kiddo and buy lots of stuff (like tech) online but I just hate ordering shoes and clothes online and then send it back and forth every time when I can just walk in a store and try them on for a minute and buy. The shoe sizing is so inconsistent that I have in my nike running shoes size 43 and in normal ones 42 or less.
      (also better for the climate)

    • @la6136
      @la6136 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nike has plenty of stores and outlet stores everywhere if you want to try on in person. On top of that majority of Nike's competitors (outside of Adidas) are smaller brands with little to no in person stores. Nike should be doing better than their competitors then. Your point doesn't explain the drop in Nike sales.

    • @benf91
      @benf91 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're right but if I know the quality is there (e.g. Brooks) or if the value proposition is still there even if the shoe is so-so (e.g. Puma), I'll buy online no problem.

    • @BigHomieMike97
      @BigHomieMike97 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And that’s if you can even find your size in stores.. then to make it worst, it takes a full month for you get your shoes or cleats.. Nike is just trash at this point

  • @God__Emperor_
    @God__Emperor_ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    A company has been telling roughly half the country they dont want them as customers anymore for the past few years. How is that not brought up on their sales tanking?

  • @stillpillow
    @stillpillow 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    Stopped buying Nike, just because their quality got so bad. Better of buying not so known brands for cheaper and having much better quality

    • @PatrickArcato
      @PatrickArcato 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah I buy all sorts of brands, last week bought some reebok just to wear for country walking, cost half the price and are waaaay better, really appreciated them

    • @Requeueing
      @Requeueing หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@PatrickArcato Reebok's are insanely good, mine got a little damaged after 2 years of intense wear, then I started wearing to festivals and they've been holding on doing that job for over a year so far.

    • @Habib_Osman
      @Habib_Osman หลายเดือนก่อน

      Which brand? Tell me please.

    • @Habib_Osman
      @Habib_Osman หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Requeueing Reebok?? Nahhh.

    • @pierrehahn64
      @pierrehahn64 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Asics

  • @Sabundy
    @Sabundy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +119

    Asics has a running shoe line up that wipes the floor with Nike's line up imho. And Asics are more comfortable and durable too. Whats more Asics has been just as innovative in the last 2-3 years as Nike and with the MetaSpeed Sky Paris has absolutely matched Nike in the supershoe race. All while being a significantly smaller company.
    Fun fact: Nike started out as an importer of Asics (then known as Onitsuka Tiger) shoes to the US. Phil Knight got a lot of the ideas for starting Nike upon visiting Asics in Japan and getting a tour of their company and meeting the founder of Asics Mr. Onitsuka. Its very possible that without Asics there would have been no Nike.

    • @TimLSim
      @TimLSim 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And make that now Asics’s most exciting running shoe lineup in years where it’s almost a no brainer to consider against Nike.

    • @30m3
      @30m3 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Yup, Asics are truly excellent.

    • @Sabundy
      @Sabundy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@TimLSim very true. Especially with the Super blast 2 incoming

    • @BC21beats
      @BC21beats 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No they don't lol it depends on your foot and what works for the individuals lmao

    • @Sabundy
      @Sabundy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@BC21beats Yes....they do. Of course individual needs play into it.....but go watch all the show tubers who review running shoes. For the last few years every year has been totally dominated by ASICS, New Balance, and Saucony. Nike is never even in the conversation for best line up or running brand. Aside from their top super shoes Nike's line up is lazy, and unfocused. I'm hardly alone in this opinion. ASICS, New Balance and Saucony all have superior running shoe line ups overall than Nike.

  • @Thiswasdifficultfornoreason
    @Thiswasdifficultfornoreason หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    People sought comfort during Covid. Nikes are narrow and not the best option for those with flat feet. On top of that, there’s a lack of creativity from the brand. Same thing will happen to iPhones once people wake up and realize that they are literally paying for the same thing year after year.

  • @theinconsequentialrunner
    @theinconsequentialrunner 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +93

    In New Zealand, Nike have shut down our online purchases - about a year ago. Had bought heaps of shoes (as a runner) from Nike up to then, and zero since (in my last 9 shoe purchases since). Abandoned, but was a blessing in disguise with being forced to try other brands. Big time into Asics at the moment.

    • @Sabundy
      @Sabundy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      ASICS are currently making absolutely fantastic shoes. I got off Nike and onto ASICS too. No regrets and definitely not looking back

    • @bubba842
      @bubba842 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Asics all the way.
      Personally they are my favorite brand of running shoe.
      You should check out Brooks too. Very underrated running shoes.

    • @prashanthb6521
      @prashanthb6521 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Looks like you are a sportsman or you just have more than two legs :)

    • @mike04574
      @mike04574 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Eh a lot of brands don’t even have online purchasing or shipping to New Zealand

    • @spacetoast7783
      @spacetoast7783 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Asics are really comfy out of the box and fairly affordable, but they fall apart super fast. I had to give up on them.

  • @Ahmed-vn6fd
    @Ahmed-vn6fd 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    0:29 nice to see Mike Erhmantraut left Madrigal and working as a consultant now

  • @kidShibuya
    @kidShibuya 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +117

    Can't even remember last time I even considered buying Nike. Their shoes look like cheap junk to me.

    • @userunknown7675
      @userunknown7675 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      They are cheap junk. The cheap "store brand" shoes from the major retailers are quallity wise at the same level at this stage.
      I really ask myself sometimes if they even know what they are at this point. Are they a manufacturer of cheap shoes and some speciallity shoes? Or are they trying to sit in that middleground spot (not cheap but not too expensive either)? Quallity wise they are in the first group but price wise they are in the 2nd. Sorry but their whole strategy has to change.

    • @Secretlyanothername
      @Secretlyanothername 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ugly boomer shoes

    • @spacetoast7783
      @spacetoast7783 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@QuiGonJeansCope.

    • @gabriel.hongkong
      @gabriel.hongkong 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@QuiGonJeans If I'm spending $200 on a pair of shoes, I expect quality. Not $30 crap from Shein.

    • @lightsout6292
      @lightsout6292 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@QuiGonJeansWe found the fanboy 😂 My shoes cost more, and they are handmade from a small business. I'd rather pay for quality than a logo

  • @theYT_moderator
    @theYT_moderator 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

    Jordan's are *way too expensive* given their middling to poor quality.

    • @Secretlyanothername
      @Secretlyanothername 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Shoes for boomers. Nobody under 40 cares about Jordans

    • @ineverswag
      @ineverswag 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Secretlyanothername plentyb no of gen z still covet them

    • @sdco7487
      @sdco7487 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ineverswag Yup, "Jordan Brand" is more than just old Jordans too, Luka Doncic is one of the more well known rising NBA stars and he is with Jordan brand. But even for Jordan retros I see a ton of kids wearing those. Pretty sure Jordan Brand is doing very well for Nike, they'd be much worse off without that.

    • @dracojensei1141
      @dracojensei1141 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      We all wanted Jordan in the 90s

  • @blankblankpog
    @blankblankpog 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    Once you try actual good shoes like from Asics you can never go back to Nike.
    Man their Nimbus 25 is damn phenomenal

    • @Sabundy
      @Sabundy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Agreed. The Nimbus 25s are fantastic. Most comfortable pair of shoes I've ever worn

    • @spacetoast7783
      @spacetoast7783 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Asics are comfy, I just wish they didn't fall apart so quickly.

    • @gabriel.hongkong
      @gabriel.hongkong 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Asics Nimbus is my preferred running shoe. I can clock hundreds of miles on a single pair before they show wear.

    • @Sabundy
      @Sabundy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@gabriel.hongkong agreed

    • @Micke12312
      @Micke12312 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@gabriel.hongkonga running shoe must atleast survive for 600 miles

  • @kyywii
    @kyywii 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    They honestly deserve everything coming to them. The SNKRs app simply doesn’t work, you never get to buy the shoes you want. If they wanted revenue then they shouldn’t have artificially limit their supply

  • @creativeclectic
    @creativeclectic หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I haven't opened the sneakers app in ages. Nike needs to read the room... A loaf of bread is $20 and don't ask me how much a bag of Dorito's is.. The cost of living is insane in some cities and Nike is charging $180-240 for Jordan 1 repeats of color blocking models... Buyers fatigue is real and people are focusing on day to day life over Jordans.

  • @davidmcgee2126
    @davidmcgee2126 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +177

    Nike shoes suck if you have wide feet
    Only pair of Nikes I ever had that fit were the squeakiest shoes I ever owned

    • @userunknown7675
      @userunknown7675 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Same issue here, some of them are close but others just hurt which tells you everything you need to know about how consistent their shoe fit is.
      Never had that issue with adidas (only sport brand that I can actually order online and know thar the shoes will fit).

    • @grimey78
      @grimey78 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      i thought i was the only one ive returned every pair i bought the past 5 years

    • @Drownedinblood
      @Drownedinblood 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      New Balance and Asics are best for wide feet in my experience. Nike's being so narrow is a big reason why I never wore em anymore.

    • @zyrtor1
      @zyrtor1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      This. I have a wide right foot. All Nike shoes are painful for me to wear now. Brooks, some Pumas, or NB are fine. I had to stop buying AirMax Nike shoes around 6 years ago. That pinch on the sides is just too painful, but also because they cut costs with less materials.

    • @oluseyialege
      @oluseyialege 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Finally someone else after my heart. I've been wearing NB, Asics, and Adidas since I was a kid due to my wide feet.

  • @kobenoyashi531
    @kobenoyashi531 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have three pairs of Nikes, and they’re all different sizes. They need to improve size consistency. They could also benefit from making the toe box wider in all models

  • @Larry
    @Larry 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Literally couldn't care less about branded shoes like Nike, for years I've bought cheap non-name brands from Amazon Etc. they last me years (one pair I've had for over a decade of almost daily use) and not one person has ever questioned why I wear cheap shoes.
    Then again, I wouldn't want to be friends with someone that is an issue with.

  • @reality_bites7887
    @reality_bites7887 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +83

    it must be exhausting going from trend to trend as a fast fashion manufacturer

    • @hsvr
      @hsvr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      its their job

    • @yihuda7459
      @yihuda7459 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      To be honest with u ..Nike used to make so many good basketball and skateboards style shoes…they stopped making those shoes and,went for running shoes and Kanye west shoes ..I bet they regretted it

    • @bolt7047
      @bolt7047 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@yihuda7459Nike never had Kanye that was Adidas. And Kanye's shoes were some of Adidas's top seller's

  • @fionaanimates8692
    @fionaanimates8692 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    I had multiple pairs of white Air Force 1s, all absolutely destroyed not even 2 months into wearing them. I wiped them down every time I wore them and tried to limit my wear of them. I loved the look of white shoes. Unfortunately, I have oddly shaped feet and I place pressure on the outer part of my heels, this has led to my shoes legitimately falling apart given time, on top of this, I got a lot of calluses and pain. I just got my first pair of white brooks and I am never going back.

  • @tiaxi6779
    @tiaxi6779 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Nike is greedy for raising the retail price, but people now just don’t buy it, shoes are sitting and later they just sell them by discount

  • @Metsfan1986
    @Metsfan1986 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    New balance, Asics, Adidas/Rebok. I'm in my mid 30's and stopped caring about looks and the brands in my mid 20's . But I still wear my old Nike products from 5-10+ years ago because it's wasteful to throw them out. But I rarely buy any Nike products. Right now I typically wear one of my NB 574's that costed $40 a pair.

  • @TheBlendSE
    @TheBlendSE หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Stopped buying Nike sneakers for myself many years ago, when the Lebron III was out, which was the last pair I bought with their badge. Never regret it. There are many companies that produce great products out there, in terms of materials, workmanship, performance you name it. Of course there are Nike shoes that are great (basketball, running, tennis etc) but the hype train is not for everyone.
    Then it is the price, they ask for a premium but don't give you a premium product, if you compare the quality *both materials and craftmanship* of their products in the past, there is huge difference. That said mybe they should sell at 35-45% lower prices to actually have a good price/quality ratio.

  • @nicholaschavez6245
    @nicholaschavez6245 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +65

    SNKRS app sucked, never won a single draw and I entered many. Tried to get the AlphaFly 3’s several times this year, but they were always sold out. The exclusivity approach pushed me away and now I’m on ASICS for performance and New Balance for style. Probably won’t be back to Nike for some time.

    • @zhenyuwen2922
      @zhenyuwen2922 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      All hail ASICS!

    • @michaeljames4630
      @michaeljames4630 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      more for me. thanks.

    • @nicholaschavez6245
      @nicholaschavez6245 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@michaeljames4630 I never got any, so technically, same for you. You're welcome.

    • @MrC.M.B.
      @MrC.M.B. 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@zhenyuwen2922ASICS used to be cheap now the value of the brand is the best ever

  • @biggiesnores9866
    @biggiesnores9866 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Stopped wearing Nike shoes.
    Only wear Saucony & New Balance shoes now. Way more comfortable.

  • @kolonarulez5222
    @kolonarulez5222 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I used to know this eccentric older man who would only wear shoes made before a certain year. He said after that year quality was never the same and I fully believe it.

    • @mrdoge3277
      @mrdoge3277 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      What was that year?

  • @nicolemonrue
    @nicolemonrue 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I live in nyc, which is the Nike/Jordan consumer base in the country. I've lived here 20 years, and i have never owned a pair of Nikes

  • @ryans7097
    @ryans7097 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    It's almost like their quality has been going down while raising prices and basically only relying on retros to make money with no new exciting ideas...

  • @bradebronson8835
    @bradebronson8835 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I had the same pair of Nikes I wear almost everyday for 5 years and no rips, tears, and only worn down underneath. That pair has lived through 3 pairs of Adidas and 2 pairs of Pumas.... I've also had Nikes that lasted only 1 year of everyday use.. but that one pair was very high quality.

    • @antig1971
      @antig1971 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fair, how long Nike shoes last varies from shoe to shoe, some don’t even last a year, some for 3+ years.

  • @DRakeTRofKBam
    @DRakeTRofKBam 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Somehow with comapny downfalls, theres always some tech ceo bro involved.

  • @allenelliott2114
    @allenelliott2114 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    With Asics, Saucony, Hoka, New Balance, and Brooks, no runner should ever buy Nike's trash running shoes again.

  • @kota3233
    @kota3233 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm older but I remember when Nike used to be THE shoe brand. Everyday wear, workout, and running Nike shoes seemed to have disappeared at most stores I shop. I only see fashion and hypebeast Nike's at stores now. Brand like New Balance, Asics, ON, Brooks, and Hoka swooped in and devoured that market share it seems.

  • @stevenkeller3047
    @stevenkeller3047 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Nike just seems confused about what their business is these days. In a local mall, they opened a NIKE store where about three other stores exist that already sell Nike shoes. They then opened a second store in a trendy shopping district about two miles away. Nike recently closed the store in the mall after less than a year or two. Additionally, they have limited the production of a very good shoe type called the Nike Free. A great and lightweight walking/running shoe. It just seems they can't figure out what to do, or where or how to do it. I think they've gotten too big for their own shoes.

  • @goodcompanyman
    @goodcompanyman 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The problem is that they have not been really making any high quality or innovative stuff at appropriate prices. All their new tech gears are way over-priced. Still beating those Jordan and ancient shoes to the ground
    AND whenever there is a hot drop, it is essentially impossible to cop as limited stock is available online. I got all my heats by lining up at footlocker in the past couple of years and that is literally playing the waiting game, hoping people dont pick up. Consumers are constantly asking for what they want, but they have no interest in fulfilling them

  • @kiefdemon1979
    @kiefdemon1979 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    My issue with Nike is that I don't know what size I am in Nike. I wear 4 different sizes depending on the model type.

  • @comfortmobilecarwash9561
    @comfortmobilecarwash9561 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nike shoes & clothing priced me out about 15 years ago, cant even afford the "Sale" price

  • @el.blanco552
    @el.blanco552 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    They deserve it for how much they were scamming in 2020, it's crazy how they think they need to let go of employees after they finish juicing it's customers.

  • @robbobsjobs8456
    @robbobsjobs8456 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +108

    The shoes suck, they're about profit not the actual product

    • @ajo9016
      @ajo9016 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That’s a lot of large companies now unfortunately :/

  • @jesseevangelista2422
    @jesseevangelista2422 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

    Can’t go wrong with new balance best shoes in comfort and stylings

    • @mishmohd
      @mishmohd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      are you FOR REAL?!! no way

    • @klater5842
      @klater5842 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Comfort yes definitely but for me NB looks like “Dad shoes” I’d rather cop a pair of Nikes or Adidas sneakers

    • @dressing2877
      @dressing2877 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@klater5842 they dont look like dad shoes they are dad shoes bro. With one exeption being the 550's, but they went out of style in 2023

    • @someones_here
      @someones_here 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@dressing2877they were never in style lol, only 2 NB were hyped & actually popular.

    • @smeagle3295
      @smeagle3295 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I was happy with my new balances until I realized that the foam completely gave out on me mid step. I had owned the shoes for about 8 years, but I hardly ever wore those shoes. Only brand I’ve ever had do that to me.

  • @MrColeBeans
    @MrColeBeans 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I think many agree that Nike completely failed with the app, that SNKRS app has caused some sneakerheads to HATE Nike. That’s a poor business strategy when your customers are pissed off because the app experience is so bad. I’m not sure what they can do about the bots buying the shoes when they drop but they have to stop these bots from ruining the overall customer experience.

    • @vigilancenyoni3944
      @vigilancenyoni3944 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Easy fix. Make enough shoes for everyone

    • @FloydWhoElseTV
      @FloydWhoElseTV 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Facts but Nike is a ignorant tone deaf brand. If Travis Scott has a fire sneaker, don't you think Nike would make more if they mass produce it? It's like they are happy the resale community profits more than they do off the Travis Scott's or Virgil. Shareholders don't get that flip when it goes for $200 on the app but $2k on stockX lol. ​@@vigilancenyoni3944

    • @AndrasteDoirend
      @AndrasteDoirend หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@vigilancenyoni3944but people won’t be as interested in the product if everyone can buy a pair because then they don’t feel special having shoes no one else does

  • @jdigeronimo16
    @jdigeronimo16 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I used to love Nikes and had so many pairs over the years. I think the last pair I bought was maybe 6 years ago when I realized their quality dropping. I haven’t looked back

  • @jasonfiske9387
    @jasonfiske9387 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    Hoka and On Cloud are eating their lunch in the running shoes market. I was at a race a few weeks ago and 30-40% of the shoes were from these 2 brands. Nike was more like 10%.

    • @Sabundy
      @Sabundy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Absolutely. Disruptor brands like ON and Hoka are definitely eating into Nike. So too are resurgent brands like ASICS and New Balance that are making noteworthy come backs. The competition is so fierce now that I think the days of any one brand dominating is over.

    • @alexutzu24ianuarie
      @alexutzu24ianuarie 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hoka and On are more expensive than Nike. And the Alphafly 3 are still the most advanced running shoes in the world

    • @Sabundy
      @Sabundy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@alexutzu24ianuarie They are also more durable and have better quality control. And saying the Alpha fly 3 is the most advanced running shoe is strictly a matter of opinion. You can find many running channels that prefer the ASICS Meta Speed Sky, or the Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 3 to name just two in which athletes have also won major marathons against runners wearing the Alpha fly 3s
      Which is exactly the point. The competition has caught up. A few years ago nothing touched the Alpha fly. That is NOT true anymore.

    • @iStrygwyr
      @iStrygwyr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ON Cloud sucks LMAO

    • @rook1196
      @rook1196 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hokas are decent but I would rather run in a chinese brand from amazon/temu before I ever used an on cloud. On cloud to their credit markets well to stupids and novices. Said novices get injured lickity split in their horrible unserious clown shoes and give up running.

  • @Chicago_Jayhawk
    @Chicago_Jayhawk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I switched to all Adidas like 10 years ago. Three Stripe Life.

    • @e28love68
      @e28love68 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Same here, even started buying their basketball shoes very good build quality

    • @rodrigodiaz1321
      @rodrigodiaz1321 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Like?

    • @e28love68
      @e28love68 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rodrigodiaz1321 Hardens, D rose

  • @uss_04
    @uss_04 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They always seemed to emphase a narrower more aesthetically pleasing foot profile that didnt match my wide feet no matter the fitting.
    Wasnt worth it at all.

  • @jethrojacinto2798
    @jethrojacinto2798 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Everyone's been flocking to other brands because of not only trend but for good reason of innovation and more affordable price. Nikes have maintained their cheap quality while increasing their retail price which is just ridiculous and even sneaker heads like myself have simply caught on, especially with so many undesirable sneakers coming out every week it seems out just sitting in stores or in the Nike/SNKRS app.

  • @lmfao7224
    @lmfao7224 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nike missed out entirely on the running boom. Most runners wouldn't consider getting a Nike shoe to run, beyond say flagship models like the Alpha fly. But even those have a reputation for being unreliable / not durable. Why would I spend nearly $200 on Nike runners that are mid quality, and performance, when I could go to other, dedicated running brands like OnCloud, Hookah etc? Same with athletic wear like Lululemon.

  • @somalion298
    @somalion298 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm glad to see an analysis of Nike's shift to DTC. Cutting ties and damaging its long standing relationships with wholesale partners to focus on DTC while reducing quality was so braindead it should be studied in business classes.
    Forced wholesaler to strike up distribution deals with Nike's competitors at a time when new brands were catching a lot of attention. Even now they're back on friendly terms, nobody will trust them enough to rely on them and will prefer diversification of offerings. Huge blunder. Great video.

  • @cool121092
    @cool121092 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I mainly wear new balance shoes now and use brooks for walking/cardio

  • @sinlokemp
    @sinlokemp 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Nike has become a fast fashion brand sadly 😢. Have migrated to New Balance and ASICS.

    • @Sabundy
      @Sabundy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ASICS is killing it these days

    • @InfinteIdeas
      @InfinteIdeas 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Asics and Saucony

  • @gumonmyshu
    @gumonmyshu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    My last pair of NIKE was back in 1997. Never will buy another pair. Too expensive for mediocre shoes.

  • @Gods-silliest-Goose23
    @Gods-silliest-Goose23 4 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I had a pair of Nikes for 6 years before I decided to replace them. I got replacements and they were horrible! They rubbed on my ankles and the skin on my toes. I thought I needed to break them in so I put up with it for 3 months. I couldn’t do it anymore so I went back to adidas. Long story short, I gave my brand new Nikes to the neighbors teen daughter and I’m only wearing adidas now

  • @kenny2553
    @kenny2553 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Its crazy how expensive their shoes are getting. I am not paying over 130£ for some sneakers. The second thing is them limiting the kobe releases and not doing more to stop bots and resellers

  • @BrownieX001
    @BrownieX001 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Just how much growth do these shareholders expect for expensive shoes that don't have the quality they are supposed to? Also what innovation in the last few years, I know several people that enjoy their Vessi shoes, a company that actually did do something different besides colourway.

  • @kray97
    @kray97 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I used to buy every Kobe sneaker they made....but their greedy limited release strategy really made me hate giving them my business.

  • @joseruiz6546
    @joseruiz6546 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I feel like their false scarcity tactic is one of the factors why they are in this situation, many consumers were never able to get a hold on the products they wanted therefore causing them to look elsewhere.

  • @adayexpired6370
    @adayexpired6370 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Before pandemic, I always searched for nike running shoes. Now, their running shoes are the worst of all the higher profile brands - adidas, ASICS, new balance, saucony, even previously lesser brands like Puma, Mizuno, On, brooks, all make much more comfortable shoes that seem to last longer for better value. Last Nike shoes I bought were invincible 3’s - what a pair of 💩 shoes they were in almost every facet and expensive to boot. My guess is casual joggers are probably number one buyers of athletic footwear since it’s fastest way to wear down a pair shoes more than likely, and making bad running shoes just seem like the fastest way to the bottom.

    • @userunknown7675
      @userunknown7675 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I have a wider foot nike's have been ill fitting for at least a decade for me. Whilst other brands like adidas fit well and are consistent (in both how thet fit and quallity).

    • @bubba842
      @bubba842 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Brooks is not a lesser brand.
      They are very good shoes. They only make high end running shoes and only sell to runners who know the brand.
      They are some of the best running shoes on the market. Only alot of people have not heard of them because their marketing is not geared towards casuals.

  • @kevinsame
    @kevinsame 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Lack of innovation, overreliance on retro releases, and the old business model of artificial scarcity to drive up demand and hype are some of the reasons. As a sneakerhead, I aint buying nike anymore. So glad they are finally being exposed.

    • @energieumbrella7140
      @energieumbrella7140 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You can 1000% be a sneaker head and not rock Nike. Being a sneaker head is not attached to a single brand.

    • @GEES44DC
      @GEES44DC 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@energieumbrella7140Absolutely false. Nike/Jordan DOMINATE sneaker culture

    • @vintagejaki751
      @vintagejaki751 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@GEES44DCNot the running culture. They prefer everything but Nike it seems.

  • @flicksbyhans
    @flicksbyhans 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just wearing out my last pair of Nikes. I have been admiring the ON and New Balance shoes for the gym

  • @dmitriyobidin6049
    @dmitriyobidin6049 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When you are not a monopoly and in a market where there are almost no complex technology involved(like it, car manufacturing, etc.) - your share of the market could fluctuate drastically.
    1 bad move can mean everything.

  • @superman60201
    @superman60201 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Would rather buy food

  • @CJ-dx5mc
    @CJ-dx5mc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I bought their skate shoes for about 10 years, but in the last four years I’ve avoided them, they’ve been changing the models. Thinner material, less lining, I was getting holes and rips from small abrasions.

  • @MrBlairskie
    @MrBlairskie 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Someone told me in the 90s when I was a kid that Nike shoes were made in sweatshops. I literally haven't bought a pair since.

    • @GEES44DC
      @GEES44DC 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Everything is made in sweatshops.

    • @GEES44DC
      @GEES44DC 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Everything is made in sweatshops.

    • @mrdoge3277
      @mrdoge3277 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@GEES44DCthats very sad

    • @mrdoge3277
      @mrdoge3277 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@GEES44DCthats very sad

  • @eska6722
    @eska6722 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Quality is shit now… my shoes degrade after a few months and I’m not even physically active!!

  • @damienmarshall1848
    @damienmarshall1848 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Quite honestly sick of the price tags they keep coming up with. Nike used to be an affordable sports brand but now its carrying on like its a high end designer label. Also, the way its pushed up the price of football shirts from a respectable £40-45 to a crazy £85 for a budget version and £125 for the next version is just stupid. I can't buy my 9 year old son a full kit for less than £100 either and they change 3 kits every year. I think everyone now just realises

  • @jamalmarsh2617
    @jamalmarsh2617 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thats Jontay Porter meme was Savage

  • @unifairsum21
    @unifairsum21 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Nikes cost too much for what they are other smaller brands are way better built for the same price its why nike is falling

  • @DiamondMind949
    @DiamondMind949 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Ever tried Adidas Ultra Boost shoes? Once you try 'em you never go back to wearing anything else.

    • @PatrickArcato
      @PatrickArcato 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Adidas also look way better and have colours that aren't put together by a colour blind dude

  • @stefanpajovic4295
    @stefanpajovic4295 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bought a Nike sneaker a couple of months ago and it started falling apart after a couple of days. The hard, plastic cover just ripped through the foam at the back and the air sole burst. The shoelaces untie all the time and the padding at the back looks like a dog gnawed on it. And these are $70 sneakers I just walk to work and back; no running, no rain. After a decade and a half of shopping exclusively for Air Max models, the next pair of sneakers I buy (which is gonna be really soon from what I can see) is NOT going to be Nike.

  • @ehbebaka
    @ehbebaka 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The only nike shoes I wear are vaporflys and af1's. But af1's are too expensive for the quality you get, plus, they are never on discount so I stopped buying new pairs years ago. As for vaporfly's? I get them on discount at my local nike clearance store, when I'm lucky.

  • @aceyage
    @aceyage 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love seeing all these corporate grifters fail.

  • @lpeishii
    @lpeishii 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I've spent hundreds of $ for their shoes e.g. Roshe Run, Zoom Elite 8, Jordan 3, React Element 87 (collab. w/ Undercover). My biggest disappointment is that they do not last long and perform significantly worse compared to other brands who charge less for identical products. Every wear would make me feel like I was scammed.

  • @kevmills8319
    @kevmills8319 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Nike and Jordan are such iconic brands. I’ve been a Jordan fan since I was 8. I sure hope they get it together soon.

  • @andayaman
    @andayaman 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Current designs can't even compete with 90's designs.

  • @manojr9281
    @manojr9281 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Used to love Nike football cleats, especially the mercurial line. They used to be be similarly priced to Addidas. Now they are just more expensive.

  • @freckrpeckr
    @freckrpeckr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Wtf no mention on Nike Sb, does she even know what that is?

    • @JellyFlavoredGerman
      @JellyFlavoredGerman 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Why mention SB? The issues in the SB line are the same. Shit quality, no innovation.

  • @trydodis690
    @trydodis690 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I find it hilarious how outdated all their performance technology is.
    Shoes nowadays now have carbon fibre plates, supercritical nitrogen infused foam, orthotic midsoles and Nike is still doing its best to pump out air shoes as if it’s even remotely competitive with other brands.

  • @Deadmeme64
    @Deadmeme64 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I don't care much for what brand of shoes I have, as long as they fit. When they stopped selling nike at most shoe and sports stores, I just stopped considering them.

  • @churblefurbles
    @churblefurbles 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Nike has bad associations now, will never buy again.

    • @SwiftySanders
      @SwiftySanders 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If I was buying shoes based solely on politics there are a lot of brands beyond just shoes I would not buy. 🤦🏾‍♂️ Separating your politics from your purchases is a good way to remain balanced. The truth is that the post 2020 Nike’s have not being good and even back in 2019 you started to see the drop off in quality and design.

  • @RalphBarbagallo
    @RalphBarbagallo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    They don't have a shoe as comfortable as Ultraboost. Ultraboost has made me a total Adidas nut. And I don't really care about sneakers.

    • @JJ-zr6fu
      @JJ-zr6fu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The Ultraboost is a special shoe

    • @RalphBarbagallo
      @RalphBarbagallo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JJ-zr6fu Yep! Often imitated, never duplicated. I've introduced a lot of my fellow non shone aficionado friends to the Ultraboost family and they've become dedicated fans.

    • @sondrejohansen48
      @sondrejohansen48 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Both the zoom x and react x foam could have given ultra boost a run for the money, but they keep changing the design and composition every year, so you get a different shoe everytime. The inconsistency is what killed the react for me.
      Nike still makes great performance shoe but they have definitely lost the entire casual shoe and daily runner shoe market. The competitors have better options

    • @albertteng1191
      @albertteng1191 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      boost is nice but its old, try saucony or new balance or even asics , you'll thank me for it.

  • @nandanshetty9112
    @nandanshetty9112 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A Running shoes costs $1.79 dollars to make it in Vietnam and they sell it for $99.99 i think they deserve this downfall