Even if they do they will just keep the same high cost with low pay if they do invest in manufacturing here. Like it’s not like they are going to build manufacturing here to lower cost they will do it to make more money only
the interviewer is smarter than the 'expert' who is obsessing about semantics. yes it is important to make stuff but if the stuff made is more expensive than what people can afford on their current remuneration rates, then the cost of the goods manufactured for a domestic market will have to have a government subsidy, no?
Only a subjective opinion, he didn't actually say what was promised and what didn't happen. Just said "many people believe that didn't happen, what was promised." More gaslighting without actual evidence and numbers.
If you’re reading this and you voted for him: Read about what the shamed senators of Rome did to protect their family name after being found guilty of lying, stealing et al.
Interesting. The case is essentially that tariffs are actually a kind of Pigouvian tax that are pricing in externalities (similar to a carbon tax), which are a result of standard economic theory failing to factor in geopolitical realities. Even though worrying about who does the manufacturing in economic theory is suboptimal, we obviously have to do so in the real world, so tariffs are corrective in that sense.
This guy forgot to make the case. He just talked about why you shouldn’t call it a sales tax. This was extremely light on information
So there is no case.
Businesses aren't going to make billion dollar investments based on a policy that will last 4 years tops
Even if they do they will just keep the same high cost with low pay if they do invest in manufacturing here. Like it’s not like they are going to build manufacturing here to lower cost they will do it to make more money only
the interviewer is smarter than the 'expert' who is obsessing about semantics. yes it is important to make stuff but if the stuff made is more expensive than what people can afford on their current remuneration rates, then the cost of the goods manufactured for a domestic market will have to have a government subsidy, no?
Pretty useless segment just saying there are opinions without basis in any facts.
All right buddy I'm going to give you these 8 minutes and see if you're able to convince me
Only a subjective opinion, he didn't actually say what was promised and what didn't happen. Just said "many people believe that didn't happen, what was promised." More gaslighting without actual evidence and numbers.
If you’re reading this and you voted for him: Read about what the shamed senators of Rome did to protect their family name after being found guilty of lying, stealing et al.
Just like every other segment on making a case for Trump's policies - all feelings and ideas with no facts.
Interesting. The case is essentially that tariffs are actually a kind of Pigouvian tax that are pricing in externalities (similar to a carbon tax), which are a result of standard economic theory failing to factor in geopolitical realities. Even though worrying about who does the manufacturing in economic theory is suboptimal, we obviously have to do so in the real world, so tariffs are corrective in that sense.
"The case is essentially that tariffs are actually a kind of"
Verbosity, insufferable amount of it.... And, no tariffs are not "Pigouvian taxes".
@ Yikes. Please, take your medicine.