The Greatest Dynasties In NBA History

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.ค. 2020
  • Here are the 10 greatest NBA dynasties of all time.
    Follow us on Instagram: / nonstop
    Follow us on Twitter: / nonstop
    Creating a dynasty is the ultimate goal that every team in every sport constantly strives for. But it’s an incredibly difficult task, especially in the NBA. Players demand trades. Coaches eventually move on no matter how great they are. Injuries can rob athletes of their prime years. However, some teams have been able to find the right combination of players, coaches and management, and dominate the NBA for a number of seasons. Let’s take a look at the greatest NBA dynasties of all time.
    The Greatest Dynasties In NBA History
  • กีฬา

ความคิดเห็น • 911

  • @nonstop
    @nonstop  3 ปีที่แล้ว +306

    Yes, this is a re-upload. Had to fix a couple mistakes. Enjoy guys!

    • @perebiakpara6609
      @perebiakpara6609 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      No wonder

    • @ASuarez30
      @ASuarez30 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Re-Comment from Goat video
      You should do a video of the most underated athlete in every major sport but if you did could you make it ranked...Please. Thank you

    • @justinchan1127
      @justinchan1127 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Warriors dynasty might not actually be over tho

    • @redacted6676
      @redacted6676 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The warriors dynasty is not over yet

    • @ferropaladin
      @ferropaladin 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The 2006 heat?

  • @Texan45
    @Texan45 3 ปีที่แล้ว +509

    Kevin Durant said he left GS because when people mentioned the 2017-2019 GSW, they said "Kevin Durant and the GSW" he never felt like he belonged. What KD fails to understand/realize is that usually when someone mentioned a player THEN the team, it almost always a sign of them saying "This dude is the best on the team." Instead, he took it as an insult.

    • @anthonyvallejo1537
      @anthonyvallejo1537 2 ปีที่แล้ว +61

      He’s also a big baby. Hence the nicknames cupcake n snake

    • @anthonyvallejo1537
      @anthonyvallejo1537 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@simninja95655 lol someone’s feelings r hurt 😢. Its ok cupcake 🧁.

    • @anthonyvallejo1537
      @anthonyvallejo1537 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@simninja95655 lol its like arguing with an 8 year old. I never said i was better than Durant cupcake 🧁. 😆

    • @Bsfnelz20
      @Bsfnelz20 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Lol I never knew that but I can see how he took it. Can't believe how soft and sensitive the world is turning into. It's like a band KEVIN DURANT & THE SELFISH GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS 😂😂

    • @prudenciomangaoangiii403
      @prudenciomangaoangiii403 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@anthonyvallejo1537 he wasnt hurt tho atleast he didnt act so he just said kd saw it from another way nothing more nothin less

  • @bricefleckenstein9666
    @bricefleckenstein9666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +76

    7:15
    Double HEEL surgery is what finally took Bird out of his elite level play (though he was STILL an amazing shooter and passer, his mobility died after that), though his back certainly was a contributing factor.

  • @bricefleckenstein9666
    @bricefleckenstein9666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +152

    3:05
    Also note that had Bill Russell not been hurt badly enough to MISS GAMES during the 1958 Finals (sprained ankle), we probably would be talking about their *10 peat*.

    • @renaldopierre1995
      @renaldopierre1995 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Super impressive…they beat all my school teachers…and wilt😴 bill russelllll stinkkkksss how u a center and shot 46% from the field 🤣🤣😩 deandre Jordan had a higher FG percentage 🤣🤦🏾‍♂️ but y’all killed kobe for shooting under 50% from outside the hoop 🤣😆

    • @bricefleckenstein9666
      @bricefleckenstein9666 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@renaldopierre1995 As soon as you spouted that "school teachers" LIE, you demonstrated your total ignorance of the period.
      Also keep in mind that Kobe was SUPPOSEDLY an "elite shooter" yet never led the league in FG% and often was BARELY BETTER THAN AVERAGE.
      Bill on the other hand was NEVER focused on offence or considered to be an elite shooter, he was a DEFENSIVE STOPPER and concentrated on that end of the floor - yet he ALSO was league average TO MUCH BETTER as a shooter in an era that big men mostly dominated offenses DESPITE it being a secondary concern for him in almost all of the games he played - and even then Bill was TOP *5* in FG% for his first 4 years in the league and 14'th in his 5'th year.
      Kobe's BEST year was *18th* in FG% - and he NEVER made the Top 20 any other year of his career.
      Also keep in mind that REAL DEFENSE was possible in Bill's era - most of the rules that opened up the floor for offensive players happened DURING KOBE'S TIME IN THE LEAGUE, while Bill's era (due mostly to Wilt) kept changing the rules to make it HARDER on offensive players.

    • @renaldopierre1995
      @renaldopierre1995 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bricefleckenstein9666 not reading all this mate u didn’t watch bill…as a center he shot under 50% (under the basket ) Kobe shot 50% outside the paint 🥴🥴 not the same

    • @renaldopierre1995
      @renaldopierre1995 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bricefleckenstein9666 defense ? Kobe has the most 1st team as a guard..go for a walk

    • @bricefleckenstein9666
      @bricefleckenstein9666 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@renaldopierre1995 Kobe has those records in an era that THE RULES DON'T ALLOW serious defense.
      Do some research before you decide to post in the future.

  • @TETRARCHMetalheadUnstableFreak
    @TETRARCHMetalheadUnstableFreak 3 ปีที่แล้ว +131

    The Bulls are my favorite Dynasty they Dominated with Jordan for most of that decade

    • @kingoffood3221
      @kingoffood3221 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ofc they r u fan boi

    • @starry12345
      @starry12345 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@kingoffood3221 what

    • @canataloupe_814
      @canataloupe_814 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@kingoffood3221 Godzilla had a stroke reading that

    • @longonisaboy
      @longonisaboy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kingoffood3221that’s not what your mom said

  • @isaiahwest9651
    @isaiahwest9651 3 ปีที่แล้ว +102

    San Antonio Spurs 1999-2017
    Chicago Bulls 1989-1998
    Boston Celtics 1957-1969
    Los Angeles Lakers 1980-1991 Golden State Warriors 2015-2019
    Boston Celtics 1981-1986
    Los Angels Lakers 1998-2004
    Minneapolis Lakers 1949-1954
    Miami Heat 2011-2014
    Detroit Pistons 1987-1991

    • @4touchdowns1game29
      @4touchdowns1game29 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      How are the 2011 heat a dynasty and not the 2008 to 2011 Lakers. Heat won the same amount of titles and it took them four tries not three.

    • @DoctorDeadzone
      @DoctorDeadzone ปีที่แล้ว

      @@4touchdowns1game29 Ya, that’s tough.
      You could argue that, because they won the same amount in less appearances means they were more clutch in the finals, but I feel like to win 3 times and go to the championship an extra year is barely more impressive just because it’s hard to make the finals, and they won their conference one more time than the ‘10 Lakers did.

    • @mrme4754
      @mrme4754 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      The Warriors Dynasty isn't over yet.....

    • @jumperkakashi502
      @jumperkakashi502 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Gsw dynasty isn't actually over yet..

    • @Lucas-vr1qr
      @Lucas-vr1qr ปีที่แล้ว

      No heat dynasty from 2006 to 2014

  • @princisdiantabanag3690
    @princisdiantabanag3690 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    BOSTON CELTICS is the greatest NBA dynasty ever. What ever reason you have, their greatness is unmatched.
    OLD BUT GOLD 🏆🏀

    • @liams.4529
      @liams.4529 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Showtime

    • @thegodlygoatgamer
      @thegodlygoatgamer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@liams.4529Yea bub 5 rings compare to 11

    • @zinvfx
      @zinvfx 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      they played aganist janitors

  • @robsanfeyissa6343
    @robsanfeyissa6343 3 ปีที่แล้ว +807

    The Golden State dynasty might actually not be over.

    • @exwhyzgaming8996
      @exwhyzgaming8996 3 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      it is

    • @robsanfeyissa6343
      @robsanfeyissa6343 3 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      @@exwhyzgaming8996 it might not be

    • @exwhyzgaming8996
      @exwhyzgaming8996 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@robsanfeyissa6343 Giannis is definitely not going to a desperate franchise that could never beat LeBron without an advantage

    • @robsanfeyissa6343
      @robsanfeyissa6343 3 ปีที่แล้ว +67

      @@exwhyzgaming8996 I didn't say that. Plus, they did defeat Lebron once without KD.

    • @exwhyzgaming8996
      @exwhyzgaming8996 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@robsanfeyissa6343 kevin love and kyrie got injured

  • @Rain_zhong
    @Rain_zhong 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    Tbh the gsw dynasty is quite over yet. Yes durant left, but we have wiseman and wiggins who will hopefully develop into great players by the time thompson comes back. When that time comes, we will sure be able to contend for another championship.

    • @jakefelton8588
      @jakefelton8588 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      As a lakers fan I'm lowkey mad that this comment aged so well

    • @stellar7933
      @stellar7933 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      good call

    • @ChiefBlue4298
      @ChiefBlue4298 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Now it’s over

  • @bricefleckenstein9666
    @bricefleckenstein9666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    10:40
    Especially when the Flagrant Foul rule grew TEETH after the 1990 Finals and hobbled the Bad Boys roughness.

  • @hungles8624
    @hungles8624 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    gsw 2015 - 3019 oh how well this aged

  • @bricefleckenstein9666
    @bricefleckenstein9666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    6:36
    And in 1986 it became a Big 4 - adding Bill Walton in the ONLY season he stayed healthy for more than 70 games (and he won 6'th Man of the Year that year for his efforts).

  • @thomasmartin4281
    @thomasmartin4281 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Biggest what if in basketball is if Larry paid someone to pave his driveway; and if Len Bias didn’t OD

    • @alecvip7562
      @alecvip7562 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      And if reggie lewis didn't die of heart disease. I'm 99% sure that mj wouldn't be as highly regarded as he is now because he would not have won championships in the 90s.

    • @woo_shynen8805
      @woo_shynen8805 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Or if jordan didnt retire in '93 or his dad die that year, he wouldve won 7 imo. I think the rockets wouldve been his hardest finals matchup, but he def couldve won also in '99 against the spurs. Think about that...
      Rip to len bias though

    • @mj23goat3
      @mj23goat3 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@woo_shynen8805 He was out for two full seasons so the Bulls would've won 8 straight.

    • @mongoslade277
      @mongoslade277 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's a great point but I'll add one more. Reggie Lewis was drafted in 1987 the year after Bias died. Another what if..... That Bad Boys dynasty might not have happened and that's Bulls dynasty would've been 3 or 4 years after 1991

    • @lucapompey-buslon6857
      @lucapompey-buslon6857 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mj23goat3 nah they couldn't have won both. No one on the bulls can guard Hakeem. He to quick for rodman and Scottie

  • @bricefleckenstein9666
    @bricefleckenstein9666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    8:33
    Mikan also caused more NBA rule changes than ANYONE except perhaps Wilt.

    • @mellon3293
      @mellon3293 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wilt is cause in the. Day there were like no rules

    • @bricefleckenstein9666
      @bricefleckenstein9666 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mellon3293 Care to rephrase that in English?
      That made ZERO sense.

    • @mellon3293
      @mellon3293 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bricefleckenstein9666 sorry autocorrect got me but wilt made a lot of rule changes cause he played when the league had just started and there were not that many rules

    • @bricefleckenstein9666
      @bricefleckenstein9666 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mellon3293 The NBA predated Wilt's entry into it by about a decade and a half.
      Also, some of the rules CHANGES (there were very few new rules he had anything to do with) people commonly attribute to Wilt actually date back to George Mikan, or were due to the COMBINATION of Wilt and Bill Russell.
      The free throw rule change though was ALL about WIlt....

  • @isaacshim9554
    @isaacshim9554 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You rock!

  • @AlejandroSanchez-zs7pi
    @AlejandroSanchez-zs7pi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    spurs were close to winning 8 .4 fisher shot in 2004 manu foul on dirk 2006 ray allen shot 2013 bonus 2008 fisher foul on barry

  • @jeetpatel4577
    @jeetpatel4577 3 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    dude u disrespected Tim Duncan so hard

    • @Riri-oj1zs
      @Riri-oj1zs 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Spurs aint a dynasty.

    • @squarbuck3852
      @squarbuck3852 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Riri-oj1zs they are not a dynasty they are the greatest

    • @Riri-oj1zs
      @Riri-oj1zs 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@squarbuck3852
      NO. stop capping. 😂🤣

    • @exotic-ketchup3570
      @exotic-ketchup3570 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Riri-oj1zs your capping how can you say they're not a dynasty

    • @Riri-oj1zs
      @Riri-oj1zs 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@exotic-ketchup3570
      They have not even won back to back titles.

  • @bricefleckenstein9666
    @bricefleckenstein9666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    6:40
    Actually, McHale was off the bench the first few years (think he won a 6'th Man of the Year award a couple times in there) with Bird at Power Forward while Cedric Maxwell was at Small Forward 'till he retired. THAT is when Boston started fielding a "Big 3".

  • @bricefleckenstein9666
    @bricefleckenstein9666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    0:55
    Actually leaves out THE most impressive thing the Spurs have done under Coach Pop - 22 straight years in the playoffs, which can only be argued by the Syracuse Nationals/Philly Warriors combo but "that team" didn't win as many rings along the way.

  • @Chris12.02
    @Chris12.02 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Had to laugh when they showed phil Jackson and jerry krause talking about the right chemistry hahahaha

  • @salvatoresultana4058
    @salvatoresultana4058 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    1. 60s Celtics
    2. 90s Bulls
    3. 80s Lakers
    4. 2010 Warriors
    5. 21st Century Spurs
    6. Early 2000s Lakers
    7. LeBron James (2011-18)
    8. 80s Celtics
    9. 80s Pistons
    10. 50s Lakers

    • @Kingkam_77
      @Kingkam_77 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lebron wasn’t all that bruh😂😂

    • @mj23goat3
      @mj23goat3 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Your first three were good then you went off the rails. The Warriors _damn sure_ ain't ahead of the Duncan-era Spurs. And they shouldn't even be ahead of the Bird-Mchale-Parish Celtics either. That team would've squashed the soft ass GSW squad to mush

  • @darthconquerus
    @darthconquerus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    You can’t really call the Warriors yet, not if the Spurs are a dynasty with a 6 year gap for winning the title. They had injuries in the 19 finals and then the whole 2020 season. Those players are back and now they have a high draft pick or a trade, I wouldn’t say it’s over yet

  • @alexcamp9320
    @alexcamp9320 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    15th, last man on the bench of the greatest dynasty of all time

  • @bricefleckenstein9666
    @bricefleckenstein9666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    4:17
    one mild issue with that though - in THAT era, the West was a LOT weaker than the West, outside of the Lakers they didn't have any consistently tough teams.
    Not like today when the WEST has turned into the tougher conference.

  • @aljermagbanua3270
    @aljermagbanua3270 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The GSW dynasty is still.alive🔥

  • @brianbrady4496
    @brianbrady4496 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Man I miss the 80s Lakers and Celtics matchups..... Great basketball

  • @sppsports2449
    @sppsports2449 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    The Heat should be last on this list, and I think we all know it. No shade, but luring in top talent through free agency should not place you higher than the Spurs, who got 5 championships through drafting wisely and putting together an impeccable gameplan. Also, San Antonio is a much smaller market than Miami, Los Angeles, San Fran, Boston, etc. Even the Warriors got a championship without luring in KD at first.

    • @lucianoon8625
      @lucianoon8625 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Wel the content isnt top 10 dynasties or anything it just said dynastiest in the nba

    • @henny6566
      @henny6566 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      They shouldn't be on the list period, neither should Detroit. 2 rings don't make you a dynasty.

    • @lucianoon8625
      @lucianoon8625 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@henny6566 then the spirs shouldnt be there because they dont have any repeat dynasty means dominating for a loong time detroit did that

    • @henny6566
      @henny6566 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lucianoon8625 Some people don't consider them a dynasty for not repeating. 5 rings in 15 years is dominant though. Birds Celtics didn't repeat and are considered a dynasty. 2 rings isn't dominant so the Heat and Detroit aren't dynasties.

    • @lucianoon8625
      @lucianoon8625 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@henny6566 the heat team only stayed for like 4 years and won two thats already pretty dominant well in detroit i dont know

  • @PrinceLulYonas
    @PrinceLulYonas ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The Golden State dynasty is not over my friend

  • @spacen6088
    @spacen6088 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Fun fact : George Mikans teammate (Bud Grant) was a NBA champion and also a NFL/CFL player/Headcoach and if I remember correctly he’s the only living person on the 1950 lakers championship team. O and Grant is in the NFL hall of fame and CFL hall of fame

  • @exwhyzgaming8996
    @exwhyzgaming8996 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    My favorite dynasty is Showtime and Minneapolis. And BTW, the Lakers 4 peated, because Mikan won them the 1948 NBL Championship, and he won the 1947 NBL Championship with the bulls

    • @PickleRick91x
      @PickleRick91x ปีที่แล้ว

      What? Lol if he didn't win a chip on the team it don't count as a win for a diff team wtf

  • @rallyabog6843
    @rallyabog6843 3 ปีที่แล้ว +136

    Bro the Lakers were not sweept by the pistons. It was a 5 game series.

    • @petarmusa9761
      @petarmusa9761 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      No in 1988 pistons should won but the foul that referee called in game 6 while pistons had a 3-2 lead the and pistons should of won 3 chips

    • @boketmoda6268
      @boketmoda6268 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Petar Musa he’s talking about 2004

    • @jorgelujlrcn
      @jorgelujlrcn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      USELESS HOMIE call it a gentleman's sweep

    • @petarmusa9761
      @petarmusa9761 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@boketmoda6268 oh

    • @exwhyzgaming8996
      @exwhyzgaming8996 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      1989 finals were bullshit.

  • @patrickferguson8775
    @patrickferguson8775 3 ปีที่แล้ว +143

    The 2011-2014 Miami Heat aren’t a dynasty. The other teams on here are becuz they won 3+ championships. The heat underachieving in 2 out of the 4 finals they were in when they were heavy favorites to win both. They couldn’t take neither the spurs or mavs to 7 games in those series.

    • @omnipepper3665
      @omnipepper3665 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      I though 2014 spurs were considered the better team that year tho

    • @RumbleXBL
      @RumbleXBL 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@omnipepper3665 they were lmao that year after they won 60+ games while going 40-3 from home.

    • @nicksamp515
      @nicksamp515 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      So the pistons weren't a dynasty coz they only won 2 chips?

    • @udithsethu552
      @udithsethu552 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      So are the bad boy pistons not a dynasty? Also Heat won a championships while facing the Celtic dynasty and Spurs dynasty

    • @maayk-
      @maayk- 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Miami heat peak is 12-13 so you could nit pick that. But in their last year the Heat fail to add some good players around the big 3 which made them lose to Spurs. Its still Dynasty

  • @nateinman1
    @nateinman1 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Time to update this video :)

  • @sswlwiffleballleague9790
    @sswlwiffleballleague9790 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    🔥🔥

  • @joeford5181
    @joeford5181 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I think the first one the list (Spurs) would be the best dynasty in the modern era of the NBA.

    • @RooseveltAliWashingtonX
      @RooseveltAliWashingtonX 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah man! The were so good, they couldn't even repeat! No that's what I call greatness!

    • @mj23goat3
      @mj23goat3 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@RooseveltAliWashingtonX What this video should've done is lay down a definition of what they consider a "dynasty". To me you don't have to repeat to have been considered one, you just need to have won multiple championships over a decent span of time while doing it with the same core of players/coach. So, in that respect the Spurs would definitely qualify as a dynasty, repeat or not. It's all moot though because the Bulls were a better dynasty anyway. If MJ hadn't retired Chitown would've won 8 STRAIGHT.

    • @andrewsucksatvideos4482
      @andrewsucksatvideos4482 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RooseveltAliWashingtonX they made it to the conference finals every single year for 19 years, that is absoloutley ridiculous, they always had a 50+ win season for 19 years that is just crazy

  • @peterliu1902
    @peterliu1902 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    i didn't know anything about any of these dynasties except for the Bulls, Spurs and warriors

    • @TheIcemanthomas
      @TheIcemanthomas 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well now u do

    • @spiritwooo
      @spiritwooo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I knew bulls,warriors,spurs,heat,Lakers,celtics

  • @MrE_
    @MrE_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +203

    The warriors dynasty was way better than the heat dynasty, if you even call the heat a dynasty

    • @mypeuslyips8761
      @mypeuslyips8761 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Yes I think 5 straight and 3 chips is better than 2-4 and the heat would have only had 1 if ray allen retired in 2010

    • @simondeodoco8377
      @simondeodoco8377 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      yea KD joining warriors to beat LeBron!

    • @nicksamp515
      @nicksamp515 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yes from a team standpoint, the warriors are better coz of their 17 and 18 dominant season.

    • @nicksamp515
      @nicksamp515 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@mypeuslyips8761 lol let's not carried away like allen won them the series. That saved them from being eliminated but not winning them the ring Lmao. Even if he hit that shot, if they lost in the overtime or in game 7, it still wouldn't amount much.

    • @mypeuslyips8761
      @mypeuslyips8761 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Nick Samp well if he didn’t make it he would be 1-4

  • @jumperkakashi502
    @jumperkakashi502 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Gsw dynasty isn't over yet..

  • @Bear0000
    @Bear0000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    nice

  • @bricefleckenstein9666
    @bricefleckenstein9666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    7:20
    And don't forget Bird MISSED all but 6 games in 1986-1987 for double heel surgery, that he never fully recovered from, though the back was his cited reason for retiring.

    • @randywhite3947
      @randywhite3947 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks for all the information

  • @alejandrovasquez4948
    @alejandrovasquez4948 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    The Pistons and Heat with 2 championships should really not be considered a dynasty.

    • @footballomega
      @footballomega 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      But they dominated.

    • @Noah-il9ft
      @Noah-il9ft 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They won back to back so its a dynasty

    • @aureliovasquez988
      @aureliovasquez988 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Noah-il9ft but it was not long enought to be called a dynasty

    • @markula_4040
      @markula_4040 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Noah-il9ft ​@Omega Ѱ So did Kobe's Lakers after Shaq left with back to back titles including going to 3 straight Finals like the Bad Boy Pistons did so how come they didn't get mentioned?

    • @mongoslade277
      @mongoslade277 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Pistons won back2back and was cheated out of a 3rd championship. 5 straight eastern conference finals

  • @itzporter5651
    @itzporter5651 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    1042th view yay 😀 im feeling special

  • @matthewcdupre
    @matthewcdupre ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Watching this in June 2022 and the Warriors are on the cusp to winning another Championship

  • @lukascf9091
    @lukascf9091 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do the greatest dynasties of the nfl

  • @cmnsne
    @cmnsne 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Would take the Spurs 20 year dynasty over them all, or Russel's Celtics.

  • @Dan-mb8dd
    @Dan-mb8dd ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The GSW dynasty isn't over lol

    • @kagnmaga266
      @kagnmaga266 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes it is

    • @leox1876
      @leox1876 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      this video was uploaded 2 years ago bum

  • @oluwarotimi_98
    @oluwarotimi_98 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What's the name of the background music

  • @araucanoraptorargentinus3973
    @araucanoraptorargentinus3973 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The 2000s Spurs are an underrated dynasty.

  • @no-yo4ed
    @no-yo4ed 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    3:49 bruh it's the Philadelphia warriors/golden state warriors

    • @merlinlipin2517
      @merlinlipin2517 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No, Wilt first played with the Warriors but then won a title with the 76ers

    • @musclesandmascara8208
      @musclesandmascara8208 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Merlin Lipin no

    • @imvsyt3030
      @imvsyt3030 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Merlin Lipin fam warriors were first in philly before they moved to Oakland and then San Francisco

    • @ALV5252
      @ALV5252 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Phila Warriors

    • @inotrinidad7262
      @inotrinidad7262 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Its sixers idiots

  • @leoncatchme5566
    @leoncatchme5566 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Swept in the finals by Detroit??? What!?

  • @thetotinator
    @thetotinator 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    7:51 "Lakers got swept by the pistons" close enough

  • @tydanastydanas5903
    @tydanastydanas5903 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Putting Liverpool in the intro like we wouldn't notice xDDD

  • @littyagain9402
    @littyagain9402 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    ye u gotta update this video lol

  • @Madhu_G810
    @Madhu_G810 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Lebron: not 4,5,6
    Me: 0??

  • @miguelpascual824
    @miguelpascual824 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Miami Heat dinasty is my favorite

  • @randybell101190
    @randybell101190 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    “Celtics the greatest dynasty in sports history”
    Joey Chestnut: “Hold my bun”

  • @laujack24
    @laujack24 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    bull r the best, 6 for 6. early celtic is too old and rules r completely different with such small amount of team.

  • @AcePleaseStop
    @AcePleaseStop 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Spurs should have been to 20yrs on top

  • @christlawson7661
    @christlawson7661 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    YEEEEEESSSSSIIIRRR

  • @Fen4732
    @Fen4732 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    mikan was the first superstar in nba history
    Joe Fulks:Am i a joke to you?

  • @Ian-uu9wo
    @Ian-uu9wo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    7:48 that hairline though

    • @yeeskee588
      @yeeskee588 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      To be one of the greatest I guess you need to become bald 👨‍🦲

    • @blingbongofficial5418
      @blingbongofficial5418 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@yeeskee588 no you just need a hairline that goes backwards every year

  • @dodgerskid3578
    @dodgerskid3578 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    If durant was on the warriors still golden state would win and if they didn’t get injured warriors would have won

    • @randyquench8731
      @randyquench8731 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah yeah yeah IFFFFFFFFF....GSW can't even 3peat lmao what a joke of a dynasty

    • @dodgerskid3578
      @dodgerskid3578 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@randyquench8731 true now that I think of it all that money spent and lose

    • @marshalguo6830
      @marshalguo6830 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      yea and if micheal jordan and shaq came back to the league in their prime out of retirement + bionically engineered kareem abdul jabaar so hes 9'11 and his skyhooks truly cant be blocked and then revived kobe from the dead and travel him back in time to the 2011 finals, lebron wouldve won the finals

    • @goat3282
      @goat3282 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@randyquench8731 Spurs didn't even win back to back titles...

    • @yourdaddy6030
      @yourdaddy6030 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah ok bruh

  • @shreyanmallik5292
    @shreyanmallik5292 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Top 10 NBA dynasties of all time:
    1) 1991-98 Bulls
    2) 1980's showtime lakers
    3) 2000-03 Lakers
    4) 1999-2014 Spurs
    5) 2015-22 Warriors
    6) 1980 celtics
    7) 2011-14 Heat
    8) 1960 Celtics
    9) 1989-91Bad boy Pistons
    10) 1983 76ers

  • @housesuns-kings8480
    @housesuns-kings8480 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    finnaly

  • @paulouj16
    @paulouj16 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Missing the 2008-2010 Kobe-Gasol led Lakers

    • @ultibolt3286
      @ultibolt3286 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Not really a dynasty they were just a good team who were led by the most determined and most skilled player in Basketball history. Remember injuries did tear that team apart. Had Bynum fully develop and they had last a bit longer they likely could've had the longevity to be a dynasty. I will always think that team was just a team with great chemistry and Kobe and Gasol. Comparing that to say Magic, Kareem, Worthy, and Byron Scott or Magic, Kareem, Jamal Wilkes, and Norm Nixon and it gets a bit harder to argue for them. Still, I do love my Lakers.

    • @hennylo68
      @hennylo68 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ultibolt3286 He sould have included the whole 2000's Lakers altogether but he only mentioned the wins with Shaq but mentioned the.Spurs as a whole when the Lakers won the same amount in less time.

    • @il100374
      @il100374 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@hennylo68 My exact thoughts

    • @lucianotecuanapa9853
      @lucianotecuanapa9853 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hennylo68 and Lakers are still the only team to three peat 2000 2001 2002

  • @monsterzinc9423
    @monsterzinc9423 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Gotta change golden state to 2022 now lol they got another ring gotta love to hate them warriors and their dominance

  • @psychedelicprod.2188
    @psychedelicprod.2188 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1:40 I had a an old cd with a Chicago Bulls game forgot who they were playing against but Scottie Pippen,Michael Jordan, and Dennis Rodman were unstoppable on that game

  • @ericmathis3746
    @ericmathis3746 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Anyone who sees this and takes a few seconds of your time to reply is greatly appreciated.. these are my top two all-time starting 5s....who wins in a 7 game series...(that's with every player in their primes):
    Team #1:
    PG: Magic Johnson
    SG: Michael Jordan
    SF: Larry Bird
    PF: Tim Duncan
    C: Shaq
    Team #2:
    PG: Jason Kidd
    SG: Kobe Bryant
    SF: Lebron James
    PF: Charles Barkley
    C: Hakeem Olajuwan
    I chose Jason Kidd for team two because in his prime he was the best defending point guard, the best passing point guard, and the best rebounding point guard.. he's the all-time leader in triple doubles for point guards.. and you have the best chance of guarding a larger magic Johnson... Let me know what y'all think...

    • @davidjanes3511
      @davidjanes3511 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Team #1 is the better of your two teams. They would win a seven game series. Here's mine, same question, who wins a seven game series
      Team #1
      Bill Russell, Tim Duncan, Julius Erving, Magic Johnson, Isaiah Thomas
      Team #2
      Jabbar, Lebron James, Larry Bird, Oscar Robertson, Michael Jordan

    • @ericmathis3746
      @ericmathis3746 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@davidjanes3511 team two wins in a landslide.. your first team has two point guards and two big men with only one wing in Dr j..
      Team 2 has legitimate players at each position.. therefore is a more balanced team.. with Oscar Robertson
      Playing at point guard. And Michael Jordan and jabbar are the two greatest scorers in NBA history..they Will chew up team number one all day long by themselves

  • @sarc4sm68
    @sarc4sm68 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The 08-11 Lakers should be here.
    They won back to back championships and 3 straight finals appearance.

  • @mjthefilmmaker
    @mjthefilmmaker 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Why are pistons and heat included, when the kobe-pau era is not?

    • @thelaw2348
      @thelaw2348 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Talk to him 🤫🤔

    • @hennylo68
      @hennylo68 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      And why did he include all of the Spurs win and not the etire 2000's Lakers. They won 5 overall and made it to 7 in a shorter time span but all he mentioned were the ones won with Shaq.

  • @calvinkleightons.bonabente4501
    @calvinkleightons.bonabente4501 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Who here after the 4th championship of the gsw

  • @kentymashmilo758
    @kentymashmilo758 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man the dubs are rebuilding their dynasty today

  • @nieeel8793
    @nieeel8793 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The spurs were a lowkey dynasty.

  • @itachi-kun7736
    @itachi-kun7736 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Correction: Lakers weren't sweep in the 2004 Nba Finals
    You missed the 2008-11 La Lakers

    • @julianduin1272
      @julianduin1272 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      I don’t think reaching 3 finals and winning 2 of them is one of the greatest dynasties ever

    • @navvyeanand2083
      @navvyeanand2083 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@julianduin1272 HUh

    • @MrE_
      @MrE_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      3 finals appearances isn't a dynasty

    • @patrickferguson8775
      @patrickferguson8775 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Julian Duin then why is the Miami Heat on here??

    • @caleberuera
      @caleberuera 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Itachi-kun that isn’t really a dynasty or should I say great one

  • @RooseveltAliWashingtonX
    @RooseveltAliWashingtonX 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Btw, the triangle offense is not Phil Jackson's. It's Tex Winter's.

  • @Brocuzgodlocdunfamdogson
    @Brocuzgodlocdunfamdogson 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I almost thought you were going to leave the Bad Boys Pistons off the list.

  • @michaelchica1926
    @michaelchica1926 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Warriors ain’t done

  • @arman-xd3et
    @arman-xd3et 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    define what a dynasty is

    • @mj23goat3
      @mj23goat3 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Winning multiple championships, not necessarily in a row, over a course of 4 or more years with the same basic core of players/coach.

  • @fluffypanda6024
    @fluffypanda6024 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Damn Steve Kerr was part of 2 dynasties

  • @quandadon4438
    @quandadon4438 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you forgot the Havlicek lead Celtics dynasty from the 70s

  • @joeyjoey7502
    @joeyjoey7502 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    warriors dynasty not over . they jus had to regroup and let their players recover

    • @bricefleckenstein9666
      @bricefleckenstein9666 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's not a dynasty if they have to regroup.

    • @ehi_ij
      @ehi_ij 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That’s not a dynasty then bruh

    • @bricefleckenstein9666
      @bricefleckenstein9666 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ehi_ij By that standard, the NBA has only had ONE dynasty - those 8 years in a row the Celtics won every championship during the Bill Russell era.

    • @ehi_ij
      @ehi_ij 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bricefleckenstein9666 are you agreeing or disagreeing with me because I was agreeing with you?

    • @bricefleckenstein9666
      @bricefleckenstein9666 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ehi_ij More disagree, actually.
      Even the Russell era Celtics lost 2 during the Russell era - his second year, and the one the Wilt-led 76ers won - sandwiching that 8 year straight run.

  • @samuelmccollam9999
    @samuelmccollam9999 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    lol you shouldn’t have 2 dynasties overlap each other that kinda goes against the meaning of a dynasty. Yeah the 80s lakers and Celtics were undeniably the teams of the 80s and had very few competition but i don’t think you can consider both dynasties if they basically split the decade in championships

    • @mongoslade277
      @mongoslade277 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The East on those days had competition. The West didn't. Only Houston beat the Lakers in the playoffs in the 80's. Beat them twice.
      The East had the Sixers who went to the finals 3 out 4 years. The Celtics who went to the finals 5 straight years. The Pistons who went to the finals 3 straight years. Not to mention the Bucks who swept the Celtics in the 1983 playoffs. The Bucks beat the Sixers in back2back years. The Bucks won the Central division over the Pistons. Also the Hawks who were the paper champions in that period.
      What competition did the Bulls have in the 90's??

  • @singularbanana6239
    @singularbanana6239 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love thumbnail

  • @d.k.m.m
    @d.k.m.m 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4:50 that boy sus

  • @elena416
    @elena416 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Bruh u forgot the golden state warriors

  • @Bruh-gs9ky
    @Bruh-gs9ky 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    There should be a “lebron james dynasty” tbh. As of the last decade, when the man is healthy, you literally have a 100% chance of making the finals and a 44% chance of winning it.

    • @fredwaller5167
      @fredwaller5167 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bringing allstars to every team you go to is not cool...i like lebron hes the best of this watered down era....He can never be the GOAT....win 7 or 8 rings then theres a arguement...not saying rings should matter but it does ....theres GREAT players who never won rings...i dont think LB is?better than KOBE so how did he jump pass the Mamba....He can have the scoring title...thats basically a longevity statistic...any scorer in the league who plays 20 plus years can break it...To be honest if KD plays 20 years hes gonna be the all time scorer and i doubt without anymore rings... Anyway MJ is the GOAT....

  • @nikola606
    @nikola606 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Warriors isn't over yet

  • @thereal_notoriousakagdubb3486
    @thereal_notoriousakagdubb3486 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    DEZAVALLA GOODWILL TEAM(from 2005-2009 winning all 5 3A state championships🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆)

  • @angusthecat1689
    @angusthecat1689 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    the bulls did a 3-peat twice with bill cartwrong and luke longley at center. proof the nba sucked in the 90's

    • @giovannygarica275
      @giovannygarica275 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bruh that’s a horrible take 😂 it’s like saying point guards weren’t elite during the 2010’s because the heat won back to back championships with Mario Chalmers at PG

    • @angusthecat1689
      @angusthecat1689 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@giovannygarica275 yeah, but the nba did suck in the 90's

  • @saladinterviews7042
    @saladinterviews7042 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The warriors are still a dynasty? Their dynasty started from 2014-Current

  • @mugabi9502
    @mugabi9502 ปีที่แล้ว

    The 60s Celtics and the 90s Bulls are the 2 best dynasties in NBA history.

  • @davidhubbard7573
    @davidhubbard7573 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Steve Kerr said that the warriors 73 and 9 team would have lost to the 72 and 10 bulls

    • @mj23goat3
      @mj23goat3 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      And Steve was correct. In fact that Bulls team would've swept Curry and his soft as baby shit GenZ cohorts right into the dustbin of history.

    • @davidhubbard7573
      @davidhubbard7573 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well they certainly lost to Cleveland🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @Hjaltram09
    @Hjaltram09 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    5:51 that summer they signed KD that summer

  • @johncambridge7181
    @johncambridge7181 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    More impressive about mj and the bulls dynasty is they never went to game 7 finals. It’s like that’s enough for today and they closed it up

  • @kingjth6306
    @kingjth6306 ปีที่แล้ว

    1. Celtics 1957-1969 11 Rings 💍 12 Finals Appearances 2. Bulls 1991-1998 6 Rings 💍 6 Finals Appearances 3. Lakers 1980-1991 5 Rings 💍 9 Finals Appearances 4. Spurs 1999-2014 5 Rings 💍 6 Finals Appearances 5. Warriors 2015-Current 4 Rings 5 Finals Appearances HM Celtics 1981-1987 3 Rings 💍 5 Finals Appearances Lakers 2000- 2004 3 Rings 💍 4 Finals Appearances Lebron 2011-2020 3 Rings 💍 9 Finals Appearances Lakers 1949-1954 5 Rings 💍 5 Finals Appearances

  • @wchannel996
    @wchannel996 ปีที่แล้ว

    WARRIORS ARE BACK BABY

  • @Quanic2000
    @Quanic2000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If the Pistons and Heat are here with their 2 titles so should have been the 94 and 95 Houston Rockets team.

    • @mongoslade277
      @mongoslade277 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      A lot of people think Houston won those titles by default. Seattle was the best team in the league those 2 years. Houston never played them. Of course Jordan retired also

  • @jameslovekobe
    @jameslovekobe 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I didn’t expect Miami on this list, two consecutive Champs weren’t legitimate

  • @bilguuntugs8770
    @bilguuntugs8770 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you tell Bad Boys was Dynasty, why would you didn't think Kobe-Gasol Lakers wasn't dynasty ? Their record was same. Pistons had 3 finals appearence. Lakers too.

  • @jemmylaroche5410
    @jemmylaroche5410 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You for got koby and Pau