I have one and I already loved it so much. But CIG finally fixing some of the ship's biggest issues deserves praise. This ship is now in another level. It's just wow!
No PDT's, it will never be complete. It needs some form of camera's when blast-shields are enabled, the Cargo bays will make it a security issue if fully ''eventually'' lowered, and will never ba a Solo ship.
@@davewills6121 it dosn't need PDS's as it is not a combat ship, more complete in the sense that has more things to it, cargo, exploration, drones, repair and fabrication, a Tier 2 medbay that looks like an actual medbay, cartography room, big armory, windows, modularity, blast shields, a garage and a hangar. The double bridge is a nice touch too and both the pilot and captain control the ship and both are central view instead of left sided. If the Carrack will never be a solo ship the Polaris is the same but 10 times worst, plus the Polaris is much more expensive to run especially due to being a combat ship and you need to constantly fix and rearm it. Sure the Polaris is newer so it has some better polish and features and the Carrack need some love like a second entrance, but all of this was confirmed and will come in a second pass.
I have never been a fan of the way this ship looks but am glad CIG is fixing/updating ships. For the people who do like this ship I'm glad it's getting some love.
This is ship has so much potential as soon as these bays are fully operational, I hope they don't sit on finishing the functionality of these up now. It can be a deadly pocket carrier with a swarm of Fury's or an excellent ground assault ship or a combo of both and still carry a nice amount of cargo. So glad I have held on to mine over the years and I'm looking forward to making it my premier Toy Hauler now to be out and about the verse in.
What you forgot was the repair drones, which makes me think that they may also build outposts ... Carrack is home. If not, you can also carry all the small base building vehicles in the cargo hold, plus materials. It will make a great long distance base/outpost builder, in fringe areas. CIG will one day build a larger ground miner similar to the ROC, but on the Atlas frame probably .
@@jedi_drifter2988 really? From what i understood the drones would go out and explore the system or survey an entire planet/moon. celestial body. hmmm 🤔💭💭
Carrack has finally received the love she has been waiting for. I only bought this ship once because she had a “billiard table”...and because I like exploration ships. Unfortunately, the carrack had so many bugs, like holes in the floor, where you would leave the ship in qdrive and the ship would fly on without you “great job, thanks cig”. the problem of the cargo boxes only above the vehicle hangar always seemed very unfinished. now the cargos would have to be lowerable and the elevator would have to function as an exit. And as soon as there is drone gameplay, you should use the drone station. maybe a holographic doctor with a half bald head in the medic bay.... The Constellation series is now to be upgraded to the level of the Zeus MK2, so a complete interior redesign. space for two cabins with wc and 2 beds each as well as a kitchen, table and bench and a small boarding area including lockers and weapon storage would be great.
I melted mine because I solo most of the time. Without being able to defend from the pilot seat was the main reason. I loved my Carrack, but it's too much ship for my play style. Then they made it more fragile. I can do everything I need with a C2 or M2.
All ships regarding of size should have some sort of weaponry for pilots , doesn't need to be extra powerful or anything just having some. Also i believe the pods are suppose to drop down after the doors open , i hope they do it soon ,
I dont see the effect of a blast shield if you retain a big hole from frontal aspect. Really should be full enclosure and some camera projection like the talons have. But apart from that its good so far
I mean blast shields over glass in general don't make sense in Star Citizen. Because according to Lore they were able to make glass harder than steel. So what's the point of having those blast shields if they're less durable than what they are protecting. I know the answer, "cuz it looks cool" and I'm fine with it but it still bugs me
@@drinksanddice6428 Might have something to do with solar flares and anomalies in space or whatever hazards you will come into contact with while exploring. Wonder if the blast shield makes a difference concerning the solar flares in pyro. I've seen carracks not shut down by them, but there could be different levels of solar flares.
@@drinksanddice6428 true, but who says its made of steel? We got all sorts of materials ingame so far that can make up a composite or alloy thats trumphing over the steel/glass armor ratio, second is the fact the armor ratio isnt defined in game. So who says base hull armor is that good to start off with? Shiels are there but what will they stop and what not. what will the blast shield protect from? what not. all undefined unfortunatly glass may be stronger then steel, but if you can forge a titanium mesh or alloy that is even better, then it gets its use. What i dont get is, you have a blast shield, means you need to cover yourself from something. why keep a open hole in its protection when the lore also said that if deployed, the carrack uses its suite of sensors to navigate onwards. Camera's are sensors, dopler ware radar imaging is also a sensor. plenty of ways to make it work. A protection system with a hole dead center to what it tries to protect, unlogic in every way. You see body armors with a hole in the middle over your heart? might add a "aim here" caption to it while on it. have a good weekend !🙂
@@michaelmichaelagnew8503 that would classify the blast shield as a EMC shielder? i know from real life practice that if they want realism, that facial gap is a problem. for what i see so far the blast shield, how much i'm hyped too for its presence, is just a oversized sunblind shutter right now... i'll use it but it just feels incomplete the way they implement it now.
They removed two MFD's and left the halo information floating awkwardly in a wierd position. Seriously CIG is getting very sloppy and taking away stuff that was not broken. The new two MFD rule is terrible and it's super irritating.
They will add the ability to lower the Cargo pods down to the ground, and even detach them. That is why the ramps are not lowering to the ground. And why you can not walk from one to the other without going upstairs.
I love my Carrack, my only gripe is I want to be able to defend myself if I'm flying it and I don't have a crew. I really want AI blades for the Carrack and the ability to hire NPC crew to man the different stations. I was flying my Carrack a few weeks ago and was attacked almost immediately when leaving New Babbage. I tried to use the remote turret near the upper pilot station but it wasn't working. Fortunately I was close enough to make it back to New Babbage before they could destroy me. My ship was beat up pretty bad though.
Well its not Capital......so no PDT's, and we're not getting NPC Crew till after 1.0, which is 2 yrs away, and Ai assistance might be dribbled in. I never liked the Carrack, i would buy one to play with, yet the game is changing, my policy is, if you have to traverse multiple doors/elevators and ladders, so we'll have to be more realistic. ships are for melting, you'd be better off with a Phoenix/Polaris, cost of ownership is going to become very expensive, the repair costs for a Polaris are costing players over 1.5m atm, and thats not counting torps/missiles Lets face it, its going to be hard work even soloing a Zues if you are attacked. treat ships as you would a blind date with a coldsore, leave it for someone else.
Grrr, but the cargo doors are lame. They don't go all the way down like ramps so you can actually load things. Could have been nice garages. And the cargo inside stacks higher than the door opening. So how are you supposed to load cargo higher than the door opening? This was a half ass attempt.
The Carrack will be much cheaper to operate all around and you should be able to replace components. Where as Capital components you will have to drydock for repairs.
i had to have both, wanted the polaris for its hanger and size 10s i had to keep the carrack because its said to be the entire games best mapping ship as well as its drones. question has it can with build drones make the carrack a builder ship? lol if so i wont need my galaxy anymore
No its just the order of cool, much like the game doesn;t need Monkey Suits, they could just give undersuits ballistic/thermal qualities, yet they went with Monkey suits for the COD nutters
@@infinitespace239 I do have other ships to use. My problem is the 600i not getting its promised rework. Jan 2022 was the last time anything was mentioned about it from CIG.
It is not improved, they are just adding the features that it was already supposed to have. The blast shields are from the original concept, same as the extendable arms to assist on jump point navigation, which is still not implemented. Does the blast shields have any effect in game?
I'm glad you pointed out the mistake of having the cargo bay doors too high off the ground. The blast shields look good on the outside, but CIG had some graphics intern/amateur do a lighting pass on the vehicle bay and the cockpit because it looks just horrible. It's a completely different color palette from the rest of the ship and it does not match at all. The only other explanation I can think of for that disaster is a missing texture. As for loading and unloading, this ship is one of the worst. Even worse than the Caterpillar because the cargo bay is even higher off the ground. Who wants to first move the cargo next to the ship, run inside, and then finish loading? As it stands right now, it would be better to use it as a pocket carrier for bikes and furies. Lastly, having pilot controlled guns would have probably hurt the sale of many other ships like the Corsair, Redeemer, and probably even the Zeus.
I think they made the door go flat out, because eventually the pods would lower to the ground and the door would be perfect then. I had hoped that they made the pods lower as well. oh well maybe.........Soon!!!
@@rampant54 It would be great if the pods lowered to the ground, but if that's the case then this update was half-ass. They should have fixed everything all at once or not at all.
@@merclord When it first came out, you could see that it could drop off the pods and fly away to pick up new ones. The pods could contain a variety of things. It could have been the perfect explorer and mini base builder, each pod could possibly carry part of a hab.
Carrack isnt a Solo ship, and never will be without some PDT's, also those Cargo ramps will be a huge security risk for a solo player if lowered fully ''when implemented''. Unrealistic for Solo play, it will not be allowed. Beautiful doesn't make sensible or practical, its an old guard ship getting more lipstick, and the Reclaimer treatment. People should stick with the ''New Standard'' ships. It does have a certain quaint charm though, and the Purple Haze paint suits it well.
Isn't the Carrack slow and easy to trap? Its engines seem in desperate need of a tune-up? Given that most of us can't rely on human players at our beck and call when logging in, or aren’t not part of some orgy gang - sorry I mean Org, this ship is considered a sitting duck when flying solo, right? It's very slow in both SMC, getting off the mark, and entering QD. It’s easy to jam and so on. Wouldn’t you agree?
Even in game now i regret that i buy c2 and not carrack. and now i have only 12mil left bc i have buy so many ships 😅 but after wipe c2 change carrack for sure....
Except they have dropped the HP number down by about a quarter. It dies if anyone looks at it funny now. I was so surprised, I looked at Erkul and yep, the HP number is really low now!
Its a fantasy MMO...they can do anything, its no DCS. Additionally, CIG could improve on their dire implamentation of seated/window views ''one way Armoured Glass'', as i said........phantasy MMO, but they wont
Could you afford a Polaris, repairs are costing player over 1.5m atm, and thats not without torps/missles......all the costs are set to go up with 4.0?. Cheap was yeaterday, and thank god, now we're getting a proper game. Polaris has PDT's, wouldn'ttouch the Carrack after researching its potential.
@@davewills148 I have both, but as I stated above, I prefer my Carrack over the Polaris :) And remember The Carrack cargo pods will likely be interchangeable for other modules, which is why I also prefer it over the Odyssey.
@davewills148 didn't think it worth buying the bld as carrack has large drones already and will probably have a building module also later. It would make sense seeing as an exploration ship/crew would need to establish advanced outposts in the unknown.
@@Archista Well as content/features and ships roll out we have the luxury to choose, it only take one change, one new ship to upset someones fleet, goals and expectations, thats why i melted everything a while back, i play for whats current/imminent, i can buy anything with the credit now, so just sit back and try it all, thank god for engineering. Enjoy
No, it isn't great again... cargo pods should come down all the way. And be detachable. It's ridiculous you're even calling it great when it's still half assed
FORESKIN, GO!!! 😂😂
Ffs😂
I can't unsee it now...
cant ever unsee that now... and im a carrack main, ffs
@@newbmechanics5699 me too brother, me too 🥲
@@OKNERO it's okay, we are all in this together 🥲
I have one and I already loved it so much. But CIG finally fixing some of the ship's biggest issues deserves praise. This ship is now in another level. It's just wow!
I agree with you, I also prefer the Carrack to the Polaris. It feels bigger and more complete somehow.
Its not bigger. 😂
@GhostRecon2015 did I say it's bigger? No.
It requires so much less work to operate
No PDT's, it will never be complete. It needs some form of camera's when blast-shields are enabled, the Cargo bays will make it a security issue if fully ''eventually'' lowered, and will never ba a Solo ship.
@@davewills6121 it dosn't need PDS's as it is not a combat ship, more complete in the sense that has more things to it, cargo, exploration, drones, repair and fabrication, a Tier 2 medbay that looks like an actual medbay, cartography room, big armory, windows, modularity, blast shields, a garage and a hangar. The double bridge is a nice touch too and both the pilot and captain control the ship and both are central view instead of left sided. If the Carrack will never be a solo ship the Polaris is the same but 10 times worst, plus the Polaris is much more expensive to run especially due to being a combat ship and you need to constantly fix and rearm it. Sure the Polaris is newer so it has some better polish and features and the Carrack need some love like a second entrance, but all of this was confirmed and will come in a second pass.
When drones are in the game, carrack will really be a one of a kind ship
Amazing 😍
I agree with you. I own a Polaris and this ship needs a little more polishing (hospital, brigg...). The Carrack is really nice!
I have never been a fan of the way this ship looks but am glad CIG is fixing/updating ships. For the people who do like this ship I'm glad it's getting some love.
This is ship has so much potential as soon as these bays are fully operational, I hope they don't sit on finishing the functionality of these up now. It can be a deadly pocket carrier with a swarm of Fury's or an excellent ground assault ship or a combo of both and still carry a nice amount of cargo. So glad I have held on to mine over the years and I'm looking forward to making it my premier Toy Hauler now to be out and about the verse in.
What you forgot was the repair drones, which makes me think that they may also build outposts ... Carrack is home.
If not, you can also carry all the small base building vehicles in the cargo hold, plus materials.
It will make a great long distance base/outpost builder, in fringe areas.
CIG will one day build a larger ground miner similar to the ROC, but on the Atlas frame probably .
@@jedi_drifter2988 explortion drones, though they muight be outfited by the owner of the ship to ither type of drones.
@@jungfaha Originally they were repair drones. I don't know about exploration drones. That's what the Pisces and rover are for ...
@@jedi_drifter2988 really? From what i understood the drones would go out and explore the system or survey an entire planet/moon. celestial body. hmmm 🤔💭💭
Carrack has finally received the love she has been waiting for. I only bought this ship once because she had a “billiard table”...and because I like exploration ships.
Unfortunately, the carrack had so many bugs, like holes in the floor, where you would leave the ship in qdrive and the ship would fly on without you “great job, thanks cig”.
the problem of the cargo boxes only above the vehicle hangar always seemed very unfinished. now the cargos would have to be lowerable and the elevator would have to function as an exit. And as soon as there is drone gameplay, you should use the drone station. maybe a holographic doctor with a half bald head in the medic bay....
The Constellation series is now to be upgraded to the level of the Zeus MK2, so a complete interior redesign. space for two cabins with wc and 2 beds each as well as a kitchen, table and bench and a small boarding area including lockers and weapon storage would be great.
I melted mine because I solo most of the time. Without being able to defend from the pilot seat was the main reason. I loved my Carrack, but it's too much ship for my play style. Then they made it more fragile.
I can do everything I need with a C2 or M2.
Really making me want to upgrade my C2 for this Carrack right now.
Me too, but I'll wait until the last day of IAE, then decide.
Beautiful video. Switch to deploy and retract the blast shield only is to the far right of the top mfd's
Thanks mate for the tip o7
@ o7
All ships regarding of size should have some sort of weaponry for pilots , doesn't need to be extra powerful or anything just having some. Also i believe the pods are suppose to drop down after the doors open , i hope they do it soon ,
I dont see the effect of a blast shield if you retain a big hole from frontal aspect. Really should be full enclosure and some camera projection like the talons have. But apart from that its good so far
I mean blast shields over glass in general don't make sense in Star Citizen. Because according to Lore they were able to make glass harder than steel. So what's the point of having those blast shields if they're less durable than what they are protecting. I know the answer, "cuz it looks cool" and I'm fine with it but it still bugs me
@@drinksanddice6428 Might have something to do with solar flares and anomalies in space or whatever hazards you will come into contact with while exploring. Wonder if the blast shield makes a difference concerning the solar flares in pyro. I've seen carracks not shut down by them, but there could be different levels of solar flares.
@michaelmichaelagnew8503 that would be pretty cool.
@@drinksanddice6428 true, but who says its made of steel? We got all sorts of materials ingame so far that can make up a composite or alloy thats trumphing over the steel/glass armor ratio, second is the fact the armor ratio isnt defined in game. So who says base hull armor is that good to start off with? Shiels are there but what will they stop and what not. what will the blast shield protect from? what not. all undefined unfortunatly
glass may be stronger then steel, but if you can forge a titanium mesh or alloy that is even better, then it gets its use. What i dont get is, you have a blast shield, means you need to cover yourself from something. why keep a open hole in its protection when the lore also said that if deployed, the carrack uses its suite of sensors to navigate onwards. Camera's are sensors, dopler ware radar imaging is also a sensor. plenty of ways to make it work.
A protection system with a hole dead center to what it tries to protect, unlogic in every way. You see body armors with a hole in the middle over your heart? might add a "aim here" caption to it while on it.
have a good weekend !🙂
@@michaelmichaelagnew8503 that would classify the blast shield as a EMC shielder? i know from real life practice that if they want realism, that facial gap is a problem. for what i see so far the blast shield, how much i'm hyped too for its presence, is just a oversized sunblind shutter right now... i'll use it but it just feels incomplete the way they implement it now.
Looks even more like a penguin now
They removed two MFD's and left the halo information floating awkwardly in a wierd position. Seriously CIG is getting very sloppy and taking away stuff that was not broken. The new two MFD rule is terrible and it's super irritating.
looking forward to cig making the carrack allowable to use the docking collar
Turn on the lights in the ship.. god damit! 😅
Lol it was on, but shedders are broken on eptu
Now just give it a person elevator in the rear part of the vessel, then its perfect 😅
They will add the ability to lower the Cargo pods down to the ground, and even detach them. That is why the ramps are not lowering to the ground. And why you can not walk from one to the other without going upstairs.
Make the Carrack great again! Way to go CIG!
we still need the antenna on top and the scanning ability
Not if your solo, you just need an escape pod.
still needs an elevator that gives you access to the ship without opening the huge ramp
I love my Carrack, my only gripe is I want to be able to defend myself if I'm flying it and I don't have a crew. I really want AI blades for the Carrack and the ability to hire NPC crew to man the different stations. I was flying my Carrack a few weeks ago and was attacked almost immediately when leaving New Babbage. I tried to use the remote turret near the upper pilot station but it wasn't working. Fortunately I was close enough to make it back to New Babbage before they could destroy me. My ship was beat up pretty bad though.
Well its not Capital......so no PDT's, and we're not getting NPC Crew till after 1.0, which is 2 yrs away, and Ai assistance might be dribbled in. I never liked the Carrack, i would buy one to play with, yet the game is changing, my policy is, if you have to traverse multiple doors/elevators and ladders, so we'll have to be more realistic. ships are for melting, you'd be better off with a Phoenix/Polaris, cost of ownership is going to become very expensive, the repair costs for a Polaris are costing players over 1.5m atm, and thats not counting torps/missiles
Lets face it, its going to be hard work even soloing a Zues if you are attacked. treat ships as you would a blind date with a coldsore, leave it for someone else.
now only make those pods AND main elevator go to ground level and it will be an absolute chefs kiss of a ship!
Next patch they said
@@infinitespace239woop woop!
they said that in another patch the cargo pods can be lowered
Hope so.
They originally said they would be detachable pods. Modular.
Grrr, but the cargo doors are lame. They don't go all the way down like ramps so you can actually load things. Could have been nice garages. And the cargo inside stacks higher than the door opening. So how are you supposed to load cargo higher than the door opening? This was a half ass attempt.
It s coming in a new patch.
Can’t wait to pick this up on Anvil day
Me too 😀
on the top right mfd in the bottom right theres a button you can pull so only the blast shield comes out and not the cargo ramp
The Carrack will be much cheaper to operate all around and you should be able to replace components.
Where as Capital components you will have to drydock for repairs.
Capital ships have PDT's, you'll just end up at the tail end of a vulture
what is the use of the blast shield? and will the cargo pods go down so its actually usable?
Now only cool factor, when armor comes in game extra protection. Pads should go down in future updates. o7
Make the Carrack Great Again
i had to have both, wanted the polaris for its hanger and size 10s i had to keep the carrack because its said to be the entire games best mapping ship as well as its drones. question has it can with build drones make the carrack a builder ship? lol if so i wont need my galaxy anymore
The cargo pods will go down. CIG added that feature partialy working to test things out.
New chess board in the captains quarters also :)
What’s the purpose of the blast shields? Do cockpits even break in SC?
Now it looks cool, but when armor is implemented it will have a purpose.
No its just the order of cool, much like the game doesn;t need Monkey Suits, they could just give undersuits ballistic/thermal qualities, yet they went with Monkey suits for the COD nutters
well regarding latest sc video, every large to capital ship will gain PDCs ... wonder how much the Carrack will get ...
I love this ship, would you upgrade a 600i to a Carrack?
Yes
Most definitely if you have other ships too. If not stick with 600i because it has pilot weapons.
@@infinitespace239 I do have other ships to use. My problem is the 600i not getting its promised rework. Jan 2022 was the last time anything was mentioned about it from CIG.
It is not improved, they are just adding the features that it was already supposed to have. The blast shields are from the original concept, same as the extendable arms to assist on jump point navigation, which is still not implemented. Does the blast shields have any effect in game?
I haven't been able to test it
But I think once armor is implemented, yes.
I'm glad you pointed out the mistake of having the cargo bay doors too high off the ground. The blast shields look good on the outside, but CIG had some graphics intern/amateur do a lighting pass on the vehicle bay and the cockpit because it looks just horrible. It's a completely different color palette from the rest of the ship and it does not match at all. The only other explanation I can think of for that disaster is a missing texture. As for loading and unloading, this ship is one of the worst. Even worse than the Caterpillar because the cargo bay is even higher off the ground. Who wants to first move the cargo next to the ship, run inside, and then finish loading? As it stands right now, it would be better to use it as a pocket carrier for bikes and furies. Lastly, having pilot controlled guns would have probably hurt the sale of many other ships like the Corsair, Redeemer, and probably even the Zeus.
I think they made the door go flat out, because eventually the pods would lower to the ground and the door would be perfect then. I had hoped that they made the pods lower as well. oh well maybe.........Soon!!!
@@rampant54 It would be great if the pods lowered to the ground, but if that's the case then this update was half-ass. They should have fixed everything all at once or not at all.
@@merclord When it first came out, you could see that it could drop off the pods and fly away to pick up new ones. The pods could contain a variety of things. It could have been the perfect explorer and mini base builder, each pod could possibly carry part of a hab.
It makes me more hype/sad for my crucible.
Carrack isnt a Solo ship, and never will be without some PDT's, also those Cargo ramps will be a huge security risk for a solo player if lowered fully ''when implemented''. Unrealistic for Solo play, it will not be allowed. Beautiful doesn't make sensible or practical, its an old guard ship getting more lipstick, and the Reclaimer treatment. People should stick with the ''New Standard'' ships. It does have a certain quaint charm though, and the Purple Haze paint suits it well.
As it should be used? Isn't carrack an exploration ship?
Yes it is. o7
Still missing the antenna?
Isn't the Carrack slow and easy to trap? Its engines seem in desperate need of a tune-up? Given that most of us can't rely on human players at our beck and call when logging in, or aren’t not part of some orgy gang - sorry I mean Org, this ship is considered a sitting duck when flying solo, right? It's very slow in both SMC, getting off the mark, and entering QD. It’s easy to jam and so on. Wouldn’t you agree?
Yes, for shore, alone is not good.
Activate protection phimosis
😂
I would say improved but not fixed. There are still lots of issues with the ship that need work before I would call it fixed.
Even in game now i regret that i buy c2 and not carrack. and now i have only 12mil left bc i have buy so many ships 😅 but after wipe c2 change carrack for sure....
what paint is that
Stock, exploration version
oh, the experdition version has that window tint?
kinda an apples to oranges, freight ship vs battle ship
Until the pilot gets weapons, AI turrets, mine will sit in the hanger sadly
No pilot guns though :(
Sadly 😞
Except they have dropped the HP number down by about a quarter. It dies if anyone looks at it funny now. I was so surprised, I looked at Erkul and yep, the HP number is really low now!
iam sooo sad that the cargo room don't lift down yeet
What is the point?
They’ve always said the glass is as strong as the rest of the ship
Transparent Titanium!
Rule of Cool!
Additional layer of protection before the glass? Or does it not work that way yet^tm ?
@@xVoidCypher maybe if they eventually break it down to that level of detail for Maelstrom
Its a fantasy MMO...they can do anything, its no DCS. Additionally, CIG could improve on their dire implamentation of seated/window views ''one way Armoured Glass'', as i said........phantasy MMO, but they wont
Carrack > Polaris
Could you afford a Polaris, repairs are costing player over 1.5m atm, and thats not without torps/missles......all the costs are set to go up with 4.0?. Cheap was yeaterday, and thank god, now we're getting a proper game. Polaris has PDT's, wouldn'ttouch the Carrack after researching its potential.
@@davewills148 I have both, but as I stated above, I prefer my Carrack over the Polaris :) And remember The Carrack cargo pods will likely be interchangeable for other modules, which is why I also prefer it over the Odyssey.
@@Archista bld?
@davewills148 didn't think it worth buying the bld as carrack has large drones already and will probably have a building module also later. It would make sense seeing as an exploration ship/crew would need to establish advanced outposts in the unknown.
@@Archista Well as content/features and ships roll out we have the luxury to choose,
it only take one change, one new ship to upset someones fleet, goals and expectations, thats why i melted everything a while back, i play for whats current/imminent, i can buy anything with the credit now, so just sit back and try it all, thank god for engineering. Enjoy
Great is a far stretch.
I feel like those flooting mfds just look weird. 😂
I think it’s the size. If they were slightly wider it wouldn’t look as strange. They look like floating kindle tablets.
No, it isn't great again... cargo pods should come down all the way. And be detachable. It's ridiculous you're even calling it great when it's still half assed
New update is bringing that tomorrow. o7
It's not fixed just better then before. The cargo pods dont lower to the ground, making it still one of the worst shipts to move cargo.