Boeing 787 vs Airbus A350
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ต.ค. 2014
- Boeing 787 Dreamliner at ALC and Airbus A350 XWB at TLS.
New video Airbus A350 XWB 1000 VS Boeing B777-300ER • Airbus A350-XWB-1000 v...
Visit my blog:
www.javrullan.es/en/Welcome.html
www.javrullan.es/es/Bienvenida... - ยานยนต์และพาหนะ
Both are gorgeous. IF I had to choose, I'd go with the A350. There's something about the wings... Beautiful.
Amazing planes.
Imagine a plane with the front windows of the A350 and the wings of the B787-10 : the perfect plane .
I love both plane even if I’m French.
The A350 and 787 are both good in their own way. They are huge leaps forward in technology, and I look forward to flying on them.
Finally a clearly composed objective statement.
Finally someone with working brains
787 has problems of battery and engines, he is less reliable than the A350
The A350 is probably the most beautiful plane Airbus have ever made.....it's looks very lovely and appealing......
lol no
It looks like a mad turkey
+SPB2727 agreed.
Of appealing means looking like a dick then yes
A330 is the best looking plane Airbus has made...
A-350 is my favourite aircraft ;)
Me Too
Me three
My too!
:P
+777-900x 787 is da best
The a350 wins due to its awesome winglets and I thought the engines looked more sharp
They are both simply examples of the state of modern aviation art, no different than smart phones etc. And like any other technology, they will inevitably look similar in design inside and out. This is especially true in a globalized world where different manufacturers share suppliers. Personally I love them both and look forward to seeing new Airbus and Boeing aircraft side by side at the gates of the world. I am only sad to see the older favorites disappearing. At least some see continued life as freighters or with startup airlines.
IF IT AINT BOEING, I AINT GOING
LOL I said the same exact thing! You stole my thunder ;)
A for Airbus, B for Boeing? Jk both good.
Good. Don't.
If it`s a Boeing, i aint going!
Dreamliner ; Screamliner
;-)
Tokin Broderik _Bozhe moi._
A350 look more beautiful!! but both are beautiful!!
Stop complaining, They are both good airplanes and its healthy competition.
I Agree
I agree with you Jibster
Nope it’s the 777 vs the A350 and the 787 vs A330 NEO
@@parkeryocum6830 not acceptable
Too many technical problems on the 787, it was already grounded several times while the A350 program is a complete success, everything worked as expected.
There have been incidents with the a350ulr as well such as a Qatar a350 computers completely prevented the aircraft from taking off. Probably and issue that has been fixed. Both aircraft are amazing. The a350 could be better compared to the 777 and the future 77x series
they encased the batteries in a cooled compartment and havnt had any problems since...the only problem was the batteries were overheating.
the 787 had its first flight in 2009, the a350 had its first flight in 2013.
wtf are you talking about thats not true why are you making shit up you just want attention
Ironhide 777x who are u referring to, me?
Loved flying aboard the 777-300ER. Also loved the 22 hours I spent in the A380-800. Both wonderful aircraft. Well engineered, quiet, roomy and powerful. They all pass rigid safety standards before certification and one is as safe as the other. If it ain't Boeing....blah blah...scarebus....yawn. Grow up, kids.
Lol....It always turns into a Europe vs. America issue. How petty and sad that we can't just love airplanes , and forget all the national fanboy love/hate.
Mark Peters I am strongly onnected to Airbus but i love some boeing planes too.
Lol
Ka Rim Same, but the a380 is way better then the b-747-8
christopher grace Don't know. Haven't flown aboard a 747-8, so I can't personally say.
I love the 787... Holy that wingflex on it!!!!!! by the way the windshield on the A350 is awesome!
If it was a purely a beauty contest then I would go for the A350, stunning plane. On the other hand, if it was a battle of technology I would go for the A350 - coupled with RR Trent.
I flew 787-9 DEL-YYZ-DEL with Air Canada and I must say it was a dream. Brilliant aircraft. No engine noise plus the climatic conditions inside the cabin were very different from the others. It just feel normal!! It felt good flying that bird. I hope more technology comes into the 777-X
both are amazing planes. I love the boxy and blended feel of the A350, yet I also admire the amount of advances that the 787 has made. Still though, hearing the media compare these two seems a bit odd. The 787 seems to be a downsized Triple seven, while the A350 is a whole new breed of Airbus. Of course, in some areas, each one flourishes. and saying that one is bad for fuel economy or size is a very stubborn comment.
But anyways, go Boeing and Airbus! a little friendly rivalry never hurt anyone.
Norwegian 787 and their livery looks exactly like a male organ. It's almost a funny joke.
omg lo, exactly i was thinking that,lmao
Hahahaha loool
Haha, no, it looks like a lipstick! :D
I know ... what were they thinking ??
LOL, I hadn't noticed but after you said it I can't see it in any other way
Airbus rules.... Looks cleaner.... Rotation from flight to landing attitude (flair) looked good... touchdown vertical speed was excellent and the takeoff rotation from weight on wheels to weight on wings looked like a smoother transition..... After wheels up, the departure attitude just looked better than the "bent wing" Boeing...
And doesn't cause engineers a constant headache! Or burst into flames..!
;-)
aviatic Not as many as boeing, must be costing a fortune in lost revenue because components fail and burst into flames for no reason.
Don't know where you're getting your info from, aviatic... I've flown the B-737/300 and 400 series, the B-757/200 and the B-767/200 series in which I have a Type Rating (est about 10,000 hours total time in Boeing acft as a F/O. I'm typed in the Airbus A-320 as Capt( which includes the 319/320/321 models) of which I have about 3,000 hours.... Can speak from experience and not wishful political ideas that the Airbus is a preference from a performance point of view as well as a passenger acceptance point of view.... Also would ask to keep your language a little cleaner....
I don't understand why people become so mean about aircraft companies? You all feel the need to defend the honor of Boeing or Airbus. aviatic i don't understand why you would use the term brainwashed, and "F*** you airbus" What have they done to warrant such harsh words? How is airbus brainwashing people? Gordon McCoy, You are criticizing the flair of the Boeing and saying the airbus is better, but how would the airplane have anything to do with that? The pilot is the one flying and manipulation the controls so of course they look different. Unless you have the auto land engaged, its hit or miss, and even with the auto land engaged the plane will always land flat. The bent wing comment i really don't get. The wing on the 787 is produced like that to get better performance and a better thrust to lift ratio. Chances are most of you have not even flown on either aircraft. Ive been on the Norwegian 787 out of Orlando and it was a very pleasant ride, and I'm sure if i rode on the A350 i would like it as well. In general every aircraft has flaws, the 787 batteries were bad and airbus has had its fair share of issues. the A350 is not even in service, so how would any of you know about how great it is and how much better it is than anything else. Vlado S, I don't understand how the Norwegian 787 looks like a penis, please explain this.
I love both they are both amazing even though i do prefer A350 for its look, and for having a slight edge on the dreamliner on several technical points (love the name though). It's a shame 787 had those battery issues, i love both Boeing and Airbus, they make amazing aircraft. The one big thing i don't like about airbus is the side stick.
I'm just happy to be alive at the same time as these triumphs of engineering.
The A350 XWB wins by a million miles. I personally like Airbus better and the A350 Stands out.
Andrew Harfenist I agree but i like both of the planes
Actually, there's not a very clear choice between these two aircrafts, both manufacturers have milestones on their own, people saying that boeing is crap/ airbus is crap, they're all wrong anyway, building an entire airplane from scratch is not like building a toy with legos, all planes have their own process and both and all another coming planes need to get through hell to get on the line of production, both planes will fight for a position in the aircraft industry. . . and im not on side of anyone, just my way to think this "battles", for my personal taste, both planes are beautifull, the only fact that will be important is, how the airlines work with each aircraft. . . greetings!
thunbs up man
i agree...Boeing and Airbus are basically the only commercial airplane manufacturers on the the planet...the Russians and Chinese are trying to get in the game too, but they're a long way away from competing with the Americans and Western Europeans..
Fr
They're both big and amazing airplanes.
Excellent visual comparation.
I've sat on both aircrafts, both amazing. But the A350 overall was much better. In terms of quietness in the cabin
Both aircraft are brilliant in their own ways. It all boils down to economics and individual airline needs and requirement. The best between the two is the one that meets the owners needs. After all the mixed fleet concept is the future in aviation hence the reason most major carriers have ordered both.
They are both really great airplanes, but since I'm a Canadian and live closer to Boeing, I chose the 787. Everything is both equally great, except for how they look. The 787 looks better so I have another reason for why I chose Boeing. :)
Go 787
It's like they're cousins :o
BenGames That dosent make a bit of sense despite their looks they are from boeng and airbus which are compedetors the 787 is more advanced ant the a350 is a little bigger
Fawk it i'm officially calling them cousins
+CJets Planespotting™ at YYC Same here, but I'm not Canadian though. Even though in my opinion they look equally good.
Bueno JuanSi bien es cierto que hay muchas similitudes entre el 787 y el A350, Airbus de nuevo ha adelantado a Boeing como viene haciendo desde el A320.Te recuerdo que fue el primer avión con estructura primaria de composites y el fly by wire,después copio el 777. De nuevo adelantó Airbus a Boeing al hacer el HTP deposito integral de combustible, a continuación en el A380 introdujo por primera vez en un avión comercial de mas de 100 plazas el fuselaje de composites en las secciones 19 y 19.1.A continuación el 787 introdujo un 49% de composite en peso y de nuevo Airbus en el A350 adelantó a Boeing con un 53% en peso además de otras ventajas en la aerodinámica.He tenido la suerte de haber participado en todos los desarrollos.En cuanto al idioma de la misma forma que yo he aprendido el Ingles los demás deberían de aprender español.
In my opinion I like the 787 more than the A350 but the A350 is the most good looking plane that Airbus has made.
Wow! Airbus wasn't lying! The engines on the A350 are SUPER quiet for such a beautiful plane... Or any plane!
wow! both fabulous & awesome.
Both are masterpieces.
I've been only on the 787-8
For all the people who say airbus loves copying boeing. Answer this question.
Who invented the world's first wide-body twin-engine aircraft?
TheMDGamer airbus's A300 and A310 didn't have the range to to ULH (ultra long haul) routes. The 747 and 767 can do those routes and they were the first wide body jets to do so. So the question isn't who made the first one, but who made the first successful one. That goes to boeing.
Boeing (747), Lockheed (L1011) and Douglas (DC 10) all preceded the Airbus 300. Basically the 300 is a scaled down version of these.
Great answers. But I was asking 1 answer. A300 in fact.
Seems like you are claiming that developing a two engine widebody is Airbus's greatest achievement.
Lets look at the facts.
B747 first flight 1969, service entry 1970. 1500 built to date.
DC 10 first flight August 1970, 360 passengers 446 built.
Lockheed 1011 first flight November 1970, 250 passengers, used Rolls-Royce engines, had fly by wire components and had full flight auto pilot from take off to landing capability.. (gee sound familiar?) 250 built.
Airbus. Conceived on 300 project 1967. Officially formed as a company july 1969. A300 first flight October 1972, 250 passengers. service start 1974, 561 built. Use GE and P&W engines. Mid range
Boeing. Builds to market demand. B767 -passengers 200-360, long range. first flight 1981,1100 built to date.
Aircraft development is incremental but in most cases to date, technological innovations appear elsewhere before appearing in Airbus products. A300 was designed separately and in parallel with similar north american products. The similarity between A300 and Lockhead 1011 in size and technology is remarkable. This niche was filled so Boeing had no incentive to build a competitor until longer range requirements appeared.
What a great video, really enjoyed it!!
awesome post william
A350 is better.
👎🏻
👎🏻
👎🏻
+SPB2727 you thirsty
Wrong! 👎👎👎
Both of these aircraft are amazing. I miss the old school 727's though.
Ya the good old days
Shabbir Khambatti 727 was smaller
+Shabbir Khambatti You miss a plane that is not only still flown in its thousands, but is still in production??
727s were very dangerous aircraft
Me too!!!
Does it matter? All commercial aircraft look the same nowadays, I miss Concorde :(
+Daniel May Three words: Function over Form.
Where are here the facts? Where is the "vs." ?
Exactly mate
Ryan Graves - I've flown both Airbus and Boeing aircraft just as I've owned and driven both SAAB and Volvo automobiles.... The SAAB is a performance car that happens to be comfortable, while the Volvo car is a comfortable car that happens to preform.... It's as simple and, at the same time, as complicated as that..... Both SAAB and Volvo and Boeing AND Airbus will get you there in fine shape and on time.... It's in the nuances that I simply prefer Airbus.... Can YOU put a finger on it???
Great comparison! Learnt a lot about these planes.
/s
Both are amazing technology advanced and stunningly beautiful aircraft's The traveling public is blessed to be able to travel on such beautiful birds.
the 787 is the buetiful and the best
powerwheelgirl & car gaming vlogs nope
yep
Might be beautiful, but it's beauty is blinded by it's history of numerous operational issues and groundings.
beautiful is a point of view but it's not the best, it's sure !!
I like both of the planes
Guys stop complaining about that airbus so called "copies boeing" there is alot of difference. Windows composite amount, engines, width, height, length, pax cap, range, price etc
hi i got a question if you want to destroy something with wich one would you fly into it ?
what did u compare?
The 787 is nothing more than a flying Samsung Galaxy Note 7.
All the boost lmao
All the boost I wish I could give this 5000 likes.
All the boost I like the 787 more but lmao
you're right, it's 2000
And the A350 nothing more than a flying TWA800
I don't get the whole Boeing versus Airbus argument (and most of those are made by very ignorant people who can do no better than Boeing/Airbus sucks.) Both companies make fantastic airliners and judging by the amount each company have in service most airlines agree
58biggles
Boeing-style and agility
Airbus-gigantic marvel(which performs well too)
Have not flown in the A350 yet, but I cannot complain at all about the 787. On a 5:50 flight I felt so much better. No dried out nose/throat and just so much better than any 777, 747 or A380 flight. Recommend it to anyone.
To tell the truth I like both! Among modern jets these are most beautiful airplanes.Very cool design!
why the a350 face looks like a robber!
s alwaheedy Although I like the 787 more, I really like the black cockpit outline on the A350.
s alwaheedy To make Boeing cry
s alwaheedy the design of the black outline around the windows helps absorb sunlight so that the pilots can see better when it's sunny
My humble opinion is that the 787 is a most beautiful bird. The nose looks very much like the late 40s deHavilland Comet look (and a tiny bit bullet train). The windscreen has a bit of auto racing helmet feel. I wonder if they intentionally designed the nose to look like the Comet or it's strictly functional. Since it isn't notched like most aircraft are, it must create less drag. The wings are spectacular with their curved tips and their amazing upward bend when the plane is in flight. It's the prettiest commercial aircraft since the Connie, in my humble opinion, of course.
Saint Steven no
Not choosing - sorry - I love both planes! Very good looking aircraft and your video is great! I love seeing all the different types - where I'm from we don't see much more than 737's and 757's with the MD80 family thrown in and TONS of the regional jets, so videos like yours are a real treat for me!
What were we supposed to glean from that aside from what they look and sound like?
1st vote !
I choose the airbus a350
***** I chose Airbus A380 #1
Haha
787 FTW
Me either!
ShadTheMinecrafter™ - Minecraft And Aviation! And I can't wait for the A350Neo
A plane with the A350 nose and B787 wings would be perfect!
Zeno D The main reasons why I like A350 is because of the wings, it looks more sleeker.
I love how the new planes have giant oversized engines
Que hermoso espectáculo ver estas dos aeronaves. magnificas.
787 or 350? hmm... i take a md11. i need noise :D
I do like the 787 cockpit windows but I don't like the a350 cockpit windows.
It is like a turkey
A MAD TURKEY!!!!!!!
+SPB2727 hahahah
***** no it looks like crap
Hypocrite! "A MAD TURKEY" but now you even said you can't wait to fly A350 and with Delta. I see your videos with you flying Delta's A330. The amount of hypocrisy is giving me cancer!
I am yet to travel on an A350, probably in December this year en route to Boston, but I did travel on a B787 and the experience was amazing. Best economy seat on KLM. But most of all the innovative air cabin, from the back and not from the engine, diminishes air dryness and it's a huge improvement for in-flight comfort. Not sure if A350 has the same innovation.
I haven't flown the A350 yet but I suspect it is an outstanding airplane in terms of passenger comfort. The B787 surely is, the higher humidity levels and lower altitude cabin, large windows etc. LOT service was superb both times I flew it. Anyway, kudos to Boeing, Airbus, Canadair, Embraer they all make superb airplanes
TO everyone: just shut your mouth, stop to compare because, in fact there are nothing to compare between Airbus and Boeing. Just look at what the human is able to make today ! Go over the jugdment !
Because Boeing is better
I doesn't want to dive into arguments, if your not able to understand something, return to school, and I will repeat, there are nothing to compare.
+Snowy Pantha ok
SPB2727 Good.
Chuan Shuo Chen I don't know you tell me
In my opinion Airbus is more comfortable and quiet than Boeing.
Is that how you compare 2 aircrafts ? By their take offs and landings ? Interesting.
Did you see the flex on the wings of the 787? Wander if the 350 does that too.
Is that caused by the use of lighter, composite materials that withstand greater elastic deformation?
The wing has to flex, if it doesn't there's a problem.
There's a documentary oh how they make the 787. They stress test the wings and bend them to extremes to ensure flexibility. If it can't flex, that would be bad
Actually,A350 wings can bend even more,just the clip doesn't show it
B787-8/9 is a good replacement for A330-200/300 while A350-900/1000 is good replacement for B777-200ER and B777-300ER.
Within those Two, I would have to go with A350 because of their capability to fit their plane with at least 18" seat.
tnt ntn And the 777X is a good replacement for the A350
Crispychip and law Uhmm? Actually B777-9X is a replacement for B747-400 and B777-8X is a replacement for B777-200LR and A340-500 and A340-600.
I wasn't being literal.
Crispychip and law From?
I was joking. Saying that instead of the A350 they should use the 777X
I like the Boeing 787 better. the airbus 350 wing don't flex like the 787. so I go with Boeing.
James Johnson i prefer both of them
where are the comparition charts?
So, how about the coming C-series from Bombardier?
787 all the way! It's awesome, and I saw it 2 times while spotting. A United 787-8 at KLAX, and an American 787-8 at KPHL.
Airbus all the way
I only like the following Airbus aircraft: A321 series, A330-200, and the A300B4.
Airbus costs more and is a lot better made! Just look at the past! How many Boeings had a disaster caused by rudder issues or any other sh*t! And how many Airbus crashes have you seen? Of course,emergency landing on Hudson,or the fucked up engine on A380...BUT! Both of these technical issues ended up with safe emergency landing and there was no deaths! I think that is a proof enough!
"cough cough" *Airbus fanboys*
EA-18 and the AH-64 anyone? Also, why is it that the 737 is the most successful airliner? Every 5 seconds, one 737 takes off or lands in the world.
757-200? Any problems?
You know, this is all about opinions. You love Airbus as much as I love Boeing. We are basing this on 10% fact, 90% opinion.
I love the 787 💕
Does anybody know how often and how thoroughly by airlines standard schedules carbon fiber reinforced plastic parts are examined on these airplanes? Is an 8 years experience with these materials enough to be called safe?
Interesting question, I imagine that the carbon fiber used will have aeronautical
certification and will also be subject to inspection from time to time
Nice 👍
❤️Airbus❤️
❤️A350❤️
Thanks for sharing
Have a nice weekend 😊
Greetings from Helsinki ❄️ Finland
Don't particularly like the nose on these , would prefer the pointy nose found on the 777 , or the 340 .....Just my super petty nitpick.
The nose is the best? It makes the plane look super Sharp!
Alexios N The wings make the plane look the best imo
I like planes with bigger tails and engines , gotta be reliable
+Hugh Janus Have you got a cousin, Hugh Jarse?
I absolutely positively can NOT stand the nose on either of these aircraft. And, I'm not a big fan of that raccoon face on the A350. Good plane......just a bit homely. Not that the 787 would win an aircraft beauty contest either, but it's the overall winner in this ugly duckling contest because it has by far the most beautiful wings of any plane flying today.
The black paint around the windows of the a350 actually does serve some purpose... the paint helps to absorb the glare from the sunlight in hoping to prevent from blinding the pilots when they need to see out the windows.
I have flowed on both aircraft on the same airline and I loved the Airbus A350 so much more. Both planes where at the same altitude.
I don't hate Boeing ... Nor Airbus like most immature people do ... I like both. Both of these airliners are beautiful in my opinion, and are not very far apart in their functions, comfort and performance. But Airbus really nailed it for me this time, and I like the A350 nose a lot more then the 787.
im a boeing fan but i have to say the a350 looks amazing i hope can trevel with an a350 some time
...when viewing the 787 from the front and back side, it's easy to see the advanced wing design. A350 uses old technology on a wider body with new engines......lame!
Bullshit, you said yourself that QF72 didn't crash. If the systems fail, the plane is FINE. Like in QF72. You say the planes crash in the event of system failure, the give an example WHERE THE PLANE DIDN'T CRASH
@Indy...thanks much, that is very helpful
They're both beautiful. The 787's just a tad too close to the ground. The engines want to be lower to my eye and that would mean slightly longer landing gear. I don't know why Boeing likes short landing gear. The 737's too close to the ground as well.
darkmath100 at least our airplanes dont look like scared cats. the concorde looked like a ugly scared cat
A350 is a better looking aircraft.
beavertown2006 eh, I would consider the 787 a little bit more sleeker and say as sleek as a 777
The 787 was a major engineering achievement, that laid the groundwork for aircraft to come. The A350, while also a good aircraft, was simply a knee-jerk reaction to Boeing. The '87, despite it's problems, is by far the more innovative aircraft. Airbus played it safe, and in the long run it's going to cost them.
you know you're talking shit, huh?
....I smell a fanboy
The hell you saying?
Well actually in the world of business. It doesn't matter how innovative you are if someone else has the better product. Airbus played it well and waited for the 787 so that they could release a better aircraft which actually has similar passenger capabilities as the 777 does but with greater fuel efficiency
I wouldn't go so far as to say it's a better aircraft. The market sure isn't receiving it that way. They 777 is still the kingpin of that share of the market, while the shorter and more efficient 787 is starting to dominate the asian market for both regional and international. My point about the 787 is that it's leading a whole new generation of aircraft - and boeing got the jump on it, and it could play out very well for them by the time the 777-x rolls out. Not to say the A350 is a bad aircraft by any means, and it may yet outsell the 787. Only time will tell.
Normally, I am for Boeing.. for the a350 looks much better then the 787 does. But, Boeing is creating their 777-8x and 777-9x now. That will be awesome! :D
I'm for the A350 because its safer. Since 787 first flew there have been a backlog of problems.
787 "Jumbo" A350 "Jewel of the skies" most beautiful aircraft flying today
A350 looks like it had too many baked beans
+SPB2727 just like you..
+Ivan_Friends/IvanWorldLiner I don't even like baked beans
Paul Stall first off, i think that that is your brain we are talking about 2nd of all, it was a joke bruh.
my brain is the size of a mellon
I prefer boeing they still use a yolk and fly by wire with physical feedback
Fly by wire is the Airbus term(electrical wire)
You can't spell a name of a device and you prefer manufacturer because they use this device? You must be a real expert on aircraft technology.
The 777 also use fly bi wire
The wings on the 787 look so beautiful. It's dissapointing that Airbus copies existing Boeing models and then makes them a little bigger...It's funny that Airbus seems to have an American view that bigger is better...
... also how many A330's and A340's went down ... There must be quite a difference in the number of 777's that has been manufactured and that are still flying? Anybody know the numbers?
the reason there were incidents with 787 was cause brand new but a 350 didn't have problems cause that copied the newest 787 version
Bullshit. The development of the A350 was completed a long time before the the Boing 787 had the massive problems and incidents!
787
You liked your own comment lmao
yaaas
They look very similar almost identical but I think the A350 looks nicer and better and bigger.
Which is more fuel efficient, A350 or the mighty 787?
jmar28a A350 100%
If it ain;t Boeing, i'm not going
If it's a stunning boeing I shall go
If it's a pretty airbus, I shall go.
(clunky old tupolev shows up)
NO GET OUT!
787 is way more complex and advanced airplane . As a matter of fact the delays and problems, even fire, on first batch is the price you pay when you push the envelop and rise the bar .... anyone saying airbus is a crap should shut up, as everybody knows airbus is a formidable contender, leading composite manufacturing, just to mention one, but boeing really leans forward with the dreamliner. this is not a remake, this is a totally new airplane where all, wings, electrical, efficiency, structure, electronics , etc etc etc was designed from scratch despite a huge cost. i really like the airplane.
Airbus is crap :D
Well its better than the airbus a380 which the engines exploded
TRU
people should be more accurate commenting on this topics .... none of them are crap or newcomers .... i love boeing, but boeing has BIG troubles with the batteries of the 787 ... (remember ??) being an advance aircraft, you may expect this kind of issues. Same as cracks on the full composite parts of the A380 and some engine troubles ... it is natural to have issues on so innovative models. From my personal perspective, i like more Boeing than the counterpart .... and both are GREAT performers ..!!
*****
The a350 uses the interior plumbing and electrics of the 330 and 380. It's not completely new.
Both are beautiful but the large windows on the Boeing are pretty cool
The whole point of the video is to compare. Comparing is not saying "Airbus is better" or "If it's not boeing, I'm not going". Comparing is saying "The A350 has larger winglets than the 787" or "The 787's wings bend up more than the A350's wings". They are both good planes. Why? Because they, both, are in production and have been bought by airliners and are being used today. I like both the 787 and the A350, and if I had to choose one, I wouldn't. But fanboys and fangirls will be fans, so I just wanted to make a point.
I totally agree. Both of these are amazing aircraft and are in production and are being used, which shows that they are in fact great planes. If the big dogs are buying your aircraft, you know u did something right
I always fly on 787. much quieter and less nois
Hope you are well insured
zackerya achmad
Yes indeed.
Airbus just copied the 787,made it look more ugly and called it a350
yann Cruz but just look at the design of both aircraft,they look pretty similar
Jaydn Wright yes, but these are the differences beetween both aircraft: different engines, different wing designs, different carbon composites, different flight systems (check out the ailerons on the airbus, they have 5 parts instead of 1 in boeing), different cockpits, different possible seat configuration, different range, different speed and different "models" (the 787 is an entirely new concept, while the a350 is an aircraft based on the a380 concept made to replace the a330) however on the first impresion they look similar, that's true, but that's just because they are rivals for the twin engine 300 seater market, it didnt matter if it is "copied" or not, it was always going to look similar...
Don't forget that it's the Xtra, that makes the difference. ( :
And it has 2 wings just like 787! Hahaha, lame! America is the best! Fuck yeah!!!!
The 787 sucks so bad that in a 3-3-3, you will be stuck in hell
Hard to choose. I am leaning towards the Boeing 787. Great video! Nice close ups.
Niklas Enblom Thanks!
Nice work Javier!
Airlineatlas Thanks!