1979 Chevy Van vs Ford and Dodge Dealership Promotional Sales Training Film ( Restored )

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 52

  • @Mister_Ess
    @Mister_Ess ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This video has led me to make an informed decision as to which vintage van I will buy when I go back in time to the mid 70s.

    • @russelljohnson1303
      @russelljohnson1303 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Honestly I went for the dodge. Visible spot welds or not it's got better engineering behind it.

  • @DetroitLove4U
    @DetroitLove4U 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    My parents had a 1979 Dodge Tradesman B200 Van. I enjoyed as a kid in the 80's. They bought it brand new from Glen E Thomas Dodge in Long Beach Ca. in 1979. I don't recall them having any issues of notable concerns in the last several years of having it. It had a sink and refrigerator inside. It was sold to my aunt in 1988. My parents wound up buying a 1988 Dodge Caravan LE ( non extended model ). Although I really liked that van I really missed the Tradesman. Unfortunately the Caravan had an issue. Within less than a year it was returned to Cerritos Dodge where they bought if and returned hassle free under lemon law statutes. As my parents are now in their 80's and I can attest to one thing - they've always believed in American name vehicles. Now I am hearing that GM may leave the country to avoid bankruptcy. Watching this clip was very pleasing. I will be 44 in November and I honestly cannot believe how much has been detracted from chrome to interior furnishings from vans in the past two decades.

  • @joeguzman3558
    @joeguzman3558 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    When the guy said- let's look at something big reminded me of my wife saying exactly that the only thing was I wasn't even at home when she said it lol

  • @edwardpate6128
    @edwardpate6128 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Some great looking Sea Ray boats in the background!

  • @SpockvsMcCoy
    @SpockvsMcCoy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I had a short term job where I had to drive one of these cargo vans. It was nearly impossible for me to safely parallel park or reverse.

    • @theemulsionalchemist5688
      @theemulsionalchemist5688  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      the right-side mirror was almost useless

    • @SpockvsMcCoy
      @SpockvsMcCoy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@theemulsionalchemist5688 Tiny adjustable mirrors at the back of the van.

    • @craigewen4187
      @craigewen4187 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Rookie !

  • @100aceswid
    @100aceswid 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The Dodge van should have been a B350. Also with Dodge you can get the Maxivan.

  • @2packs4sure
    @2packs4sure 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I see where you are trying to avoid copyrighted music,,, so TH-cam would give you a copyright strike on the crappy music from the original video?

    • @theemulsionalchemist5688
      @theemulsionalchemist5688  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      not a strike but a copywrite claim. if I get a few it doesn't affect my channel but if I have too many than TH-cam will hit my channel for reused content

  • @privateprivate1865
    @privateprivate1865 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love the 71-77 tradesman vans, which is basically the same as the 79 aside from the obvious face-lift and other minor changes. Ive owned 3 tradesmans, and i can honestly tell you that old GM vans are far superior in reliability and build quality.
    If i ever get amother 71/77 dodge van again, i will absolutely change over to pre computer gm powertrain as well as the electrical system.
    The only pre computer mopar engine i deem reliable is the trusty slant 6. But man they sure ran extra rich right from the factory.

  • @dcross6360
    @dcross6360 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for sharing.

  • @jasonc2514
    @jasonc2514 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is that Denis Franz at 5:37

    • @jell551
      @jell551 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      LOL

    • @jaykarolyi9237
      @jaykarolyi9237 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I thought the same thing! Could be?

  • @francoisnatchimie6937
    @francoisnatchimie6937 ปีที่แล้ว

    ❤❤

  • @1983jblack
    @1983jblack 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    E-150 was not a 3/4 ton. Make it a fair fight GM and provide the E-250 for comparison. Also, GM just couldn't stand they didn't have an extended length van until 1988 and couldn't compete as well not having a big block displacement engine during the '70s (Only the 400 while Chrysler and Ford had the 440 and 460). Ford has been the king of vans for a long time and will keep on being king

    • @ChillkootMarkowee
      @ChillkootMarkowee ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I've always felt like the Chevy Van 20 and Dodge Van B200 were never a 3/4 ton! (Maybe a heavy 1/2 ton like the Ford E150) Note the 5lug wheels and GM 8.5" 10bolt rear end or the Chrysler 8.25" or 9.25" rear axle. The Ford E150 is a heavy 1/2 ton, 5lug wheels and Ford 9" rear axle.

    • @whatsthebigidea8157
      @whatsthebigidea8157 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I was just looking for this very comment lol

    • @Economan66
      @Economan66 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The ford would have out performed the Chevy if it was a 3/4 ton

    • @jell551
      @jell551 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Unfortunately Ford discontinued the Econoline, as of this writing the Express/Savannah still survives.

  • @JohnShinn1960
    @JohnShinn1960 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Remove the passenger seat to haul a sailboat mast?
    Strap it to the roof dummy!

    • @theemulsionalchemist5688
      @theemulsionalchemist5688  2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Stick it up out of the roof vent

    • @junqueboi387
      @junqueboi387 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      passenger seat was an option. That van didn't have one to begin with. Just about all these vans were ordered with the seat though.

    • @jamesr2888
      @jamesr2888 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@junqueboi387 Parents bought a used 1976 Econoline 100 strip model cargo van with no cargo windows at all. It didn't have a passenger seat until my dad found one & installed it.

  • @jell551
    @jell551 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    5:40 Andy Sipowic

  • @davidnull5590
    @davidnull5590 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The first comparison, sailboat mast "standard long wheelbase models" I wonder how many Chevy lawyers reviewed that copy? Plenty I'm guessing. With all of those vans: winter road salt rotted all of them out in the northeast, all were extremely unpleasant to ride in, especially in the back, all were horrible to do any engine work on, really difficult to impossible. Gas mileage? there was still a gas crisis on at the time, performance? Nope, especially trying to tow a trailer. Chevy was probably very happy most all company owners got rid of those vans within four years, they were awful.

    • @theemulsionalchemist5688
      @theemulsionalchemist5688  2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The object was to be functional. No one cared if they didn't last forever

    • @markj2838
      @markj2838 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      My folks had a 78,79 they were reliable and good looking vehicles, yes salt takes it's tolls on any car. One had the 350 the 79 a 305, powerful enough. The 79 was a camper, the 78 a worker that my dad kicked the shit out of for 7 yrs. Wish i had that 79 today. Still looking for one to convert like the 79!!

  • @rnb250
    @rnb250 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Film resto is great but PLEASE lose they piano!!!

    • @theemulsionalchemist5688
      @theemulsionalchemist5688  2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Was trying to find music to replace the copyrighted stuff. It is actually very close to the original in that section of the film. Sounds a little goofy.

  • @merc-ni7hy
    @merc-ni7hy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    funny how chevy boasts about extra value chevy gives you...yet stop the video @.44 seconds in the video....and what do you see?...a spare rim..but no tire...

    • @rogerstlaurent8704
      @rogerstlaurent8704 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      LOL i had to go back to see it myself your right a rim with no tire WTF was that all about

  • @davidallen5776
    @davidallen5776 ปีที่แล้ว

    I considered a van at one time or another.

  • @jeromep3182
    @jeromep3182 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now they know you can get an E350 with the diesel and it have a longer and much higher capacity let’s be real

  • @AliRnBPopAndReggae
    @AliRnBPopAndReggae 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Chevy van wins!🤗

  • @joserafaelgrangefuenmayor7744
    @joserafaelgrangefuenmayor7744 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Me gusta la camioneta una Chevrolet Chevy Van; me pongo a imaginar a dos muchachas; solteras, libres, sin compromiso, sin tatuajes, ni piercings, ni implantes en sus cuerpos; la pelirroja viste un vestido azul oscuro, una blusa blanca manga larga, calcetines canilleros blancos, gomas blancas, la cara maquillada; los labios rojos y el cabello arreglado; ella es blanca, ojos verdosos y el cabello rojizo; la rubia viste una blusa blanca manga larga; una minifalda azul oscuro; calcetines canilleros blancos; la pelirroja va manejando la camioneta; la rubia va en el asiento del pasajero; yo voy en el asiento trasero de la camioneta; cuando todo se estabilize en Venezuela mi país; la camioneta es de la pelirroja; qué le dejó su abuelo materno; en su lecho de muerte; después del fallecimiento de su esposa; le hizo el testamento; para su nieta e hijos; la camioneta van es de la nieta; y la otra camioneta pickup es para su tío; la van es de la pelirroja; saludos y buenas tardes.

  • @jacobfleming565
    @jacobfleming565 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This video is such bs lol. I'm a Chevy guy but the dodge for Ford are the better options lol. Dodge has the better small block engines and interior. Ford has better big block options and more interior space. Doesn't mean the chevy was a bad car just could've been better

    • @edwardpate6128
      @edwardpate6128 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sorry but the Chrysler small block nowhere near as good as a Chevy!

  • @toddbob55
    @toddbob55 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Ford has always had better Chassis under there trucks and vans. Gm vehicles especially k10 trucks were prone to cracking frames behind gear boxes, shock mounts and other areas. Tracey from "TRUCKS" shows these issues on "stunt double" ..... i own a k10. The Fords were defintley brutally stronger in and around the Frames. The 9inch Ford rear Axle was also MUCH stronger than GM's weak junk 10 and 12 bolt rear axles.

    • @JohnSmith-if4uy
      @JohnSmith-if4uy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Anyone notice with the 55 gallon drums the Ford was
      an E150 or half ton?

    • @theemulsionalchemist5688
      @theemulsionalchemist5688  2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      the ford was defiantly tougher but drive one on the freeway at 80mph and you will be praying you make it home

    • @ChillkootMarkowee
      @ChillkootMarkowee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@JohnSmith-if4uy well I think the E100 is a 1/2 ton and the E150 is a heavy 1/2 ton. In my books a Chevy Van G20 is really a heavy 1/2 ton not a 3/4 ton, because of the 8.5" 10 bolt rear end!

    • @ChillkootMarkowee
      @ChillkootMarkowee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@theemulsionalchemist5688 oh man I remember the time I drove a Ford E250 with 430 000kms. After I went around the corner it felt like the front twin I-beam axles were trying to guide itself making it feel like it has a mind of its own!

    • @edwardpate6128
      @edwardpate6128 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ChillkootMarkowee The G20 had a 12 bolt rear end.

  • @SteezeCartel
    @SteezeCartel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    First