Electrocuted Mess
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ย. 2024
- The plaintiff rented an apartment from the defendant and was electrocuted due to the faulty wiring. The plaintiff is suing for the return of his security deposit. The defendant argues the plaintiff had 15 people living in the apartment, and she kicked him out. She doesn't believe he was actually electrocuted. The defendant is countersuing for rent and eviction costs.
Subscribe to our channel:
/ @peoplescourttv
Case # 28-389
#PeoplesCourt #RealityTV #Court
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 78 | คู่เอก "ปกรณ์ vs ฟาบิโอ"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LSOmgl0Th2c/mqdefault.jpg)
Two things that I have to say 1. Harvey said at the end that you could withhold rent if you didn't have a working oven but yet the judge allowed the defendant to keep the plaintiffs security deposit for the last month's rent when the defendant herself admitted they just gave them a toaster oven and never fixed the oven because they were just going to evict them anyways, so why then would the defendant be entitled to the security deposit for rent if the oven was never fixed and 2. I can almost guarantee you that if Judge Milian was electrocuted because of faulty wiring and had to go without an oven for a month and a half one of those days being Thanksgiving she would value that at a lot more than a measley $200! I completely disagree with the judge on this ruling.
OK Well here is how the Judge made this ruling I would imagine the landlord tenant court would rule very much the same way. I've worked in this industry for over 15 years so I'm familiar with how the laws work.
#1.He never went to the hospital so most likely he doesn't have any evidence to back up his "paramedics said heart rate was high". He also cannot prove that these outlets ware missing the cover plates, or how long these cover plates ware missing. So basically this whole segment of the law suit is all here say evidence which legally cannot be admitted and just has to be ignored.
#2 She cannot just order the return of *ALL the rent even for the months ware the oven was missing/not working, because the rest of the property was still "functional" other plumbing, light fixtures, doors, windows, locks, heating, cooling AC ect..
@@FenderBender5150how dare you refute this Judge Milian bashing with facts and logic 🙃🤣
He got a shock lol. Not electrocuted.
200 ? 😂😂 For being electrocuted because of landlords neglect, and without oven for almost 2 months!? That must be a joke i guess the judge wouldn't mind to live like this herself
Judge Milian lives in a Coral Gables home, worth about $3.2 million today. It features six bedrooms and six bathrooms spread out over 5,737 sq ft of space, and sits right on the water with a private dock.
Yea I agree. Should have gotten a full month and half rent. The fact that they intentionally didn’t replace it and trying to trick the judge with incorrect inspection report. I would have returned him much more
@jennross6466 and that's exactly why all positions of power should leave the occupant in the same situation as the people they are in control of. No senator should have a mansion and no judge should be as out of touch with reality as judge m
She’s notoriously elitist. Watching her rule on cases like this always makes me giggle. It’s like giving to JJ with a pitbull case.
@@reesaallen5474 she's the same with pitbull cases.
They could have found them a cheap used stove but a toaster oven?? That just seems like a ahole move.
$200??? The guy was electrocuted and she didn't have an inspection for his unit. A slap in the face in my opinion.
Agreed
Yep! Smh
He cannot actually prove any of that. He never went to the hospital so most likely he doesn't have any evidence to back up his "paramedics said heart rate was high". He also cannot prove that these outlets ware missing the cover plates, or how long these cover plates ware missing. So basically this whole segment of the law suit is all here say evidence which legally cannot be admitted and just has to be ignored. NOT saying it didn't happen, he just cannot prove it.
It's a little hard for him to prove he was electrocuted. He didn't go the hospital and other than elevated hr or BP he had nothing to really show. No burn mark pics etc.
I understand at the time he probably felt he was going to be okay and didint want to go to the hospital because it's a hassle , but courts need proof to award money
I think more like shocked. Like a tongue on a 9Vbattery. More surprise than pain. He was milking her incompetence.
Ps been zapped plenty of times with II0V, it was the third time getting bite by the 277V that caused me to start turning off the power. and FYI sometimes you are troubleshooting in a building and there are I000s of breakers. No luck turning off power. 200 bucks were plenty. The LL needs a new handyman though.
She gives him NOTHING for the injury/electrocution due to the exposed electrical outlet??? CRUEL. The apartment would have FAILED safety inspection.
NOTHING, because he cannot prove any of that. He never went to the hospital so most likely he doesn't have any evidence to back up his "paramedics said heart rate was high". He also cannot prove that these outlets ware missing the cover plates, or how long these cover plates ware missing. So basically this whole segment of the law suit is all here say evidence which legally cannot be admitted and just has to be ignored. Not saying it didn't happen, just that he can't prove it.
Why does the judge act like the money is coming out of her pocket? Seriously 200$ without a stove
Judge in medication has to follow the state laws of where the case is from. Judge would have loved to given the plaintiff more.
Because it comes out of the shows pocket. To me it kinda makes them bias. They pay the awards so the less they have to give
@@jennylynx1869 The show is a prime time show that makes millions each month. Paying anything is still all profit for them and seen as a tax writeoff. I doubt they are bias for what is essentially pennies for having the show broadcasted.
@@jennylynx1869They don't pay the award they only pay an appearance fee
@@RitaCannon-ef2sg That's not true. They pay for the judgement and appearance fees.
Why wouldn't the judge mention unsafe living conditions,she was stuck on the stove?
Agreed
Shady defendant bringing paper work for another apt and not the apt you being sued for . LIAR!
she should have had to pay at least 500 just for trying to deceive the judge .
" Your sister's a jerk"😂😂.
Don't hold back how you feel Judge Milan.
They all are jerks 😂😂
"Kinda" after thats where she held back lol
Umm a toaster oven for thanksgiving and Christmas ain’t gonna cut it. How ignorant.
$200 JM really lol they should have gotten at least 1k. The plaintiff said hes blessed then followed with I'm in a homeless shelter. Powerful and the very reminder to why we should not complain!
Agree🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Agree🎉🎉🎉🎉
I totally agree with you! And I pray the plaintiff and his family one day see much better days than this.
“Shock him, she barely knew him”
😂😂😂
Harvey, is that you? 😂
I think the plaintiff actually seemed like a nice guy.
He is greedy and looking for a payday to get out of the homeless shelter. He should try working for his money instead.
Yeah it’s really hard out there, he is a good man. He isn’t really greedy just desperate, greed makes you steal for personal gain. This man is trying to take care of his family. Sometimes working 40+ hours still doesn’t cut it.
He is a good guy.
The family sent that woman in there to court so that they wouldn’t look bad, let the sister come out looking bad…sometimes it’s the family that’s the problem!😮
Ain't that the truth. She literally had no answers for JM. I've had family try to do this to me and let them know I will in no shape or form tarnish my character/image for nobody.
Is it possible she just blamed her sister to deflect?
@@tammys.8513 To me I would say no. She literally showed up like a deer in headlights with wrong documents etc. I think she was aware of the situation but not necessarily the decision maker.
He deserved more than $200, he should have gotten his entire deposit back for having no oven. Even Harvey said that the landlord breeched the contract by not supplying a working stove! Judge dropped the ball morally and legally.
As soon as she said she gave them a TOASTER OVEN instead of fixing the full size oven that was there, I knew she was a miserable person. The Defendant gave them the toaster for one reason only. She wanted to inconvenience the Plaintiff(and his family) and make sure they would not want to continue livimg there. He should have sued for the electrocution, not the back rent.
Um. How many times does he have to say.. "Boards were burnt.." she doesn't listen sometimes..
He doesn't have ANY evidence. It's all here say. The paramedics "told him" his heart rate, "he says" he saw burned wood, "he says" the plates ware missing. Legally all that cannot be admitted into evidence. pretty much the whole ENTIRE electrocution segment cannot be admitted into evidence and has to be ignored.
Damn they almost killed the man and she gave him $200. No wonder her show got canceled smh
She back on justice for the people
Wait did Milian not address the electrocution? Wouldn’t that warrant damages? Maybe i missed it 😅
I think it would have, but he didn’t sue for anything pertaining to that. He didn’t have any medical bills and didn’t sue for pain and suffering. He probably wouldn’t have gotten any since he didn’t even go to the doctor or hospital, but I wish he would have known to at least try instead of suing for rent he already paid due to not having an oven later. Didn’t make much sense. But he probably doesn’t binge watch PC like I do.🥴🤣
He askrd her about giving a toaster oven in place of an oven, along with how messed up that was and her response is I gave them a home, they were homeless? Smh
Agree. And she didn’t give very them a home. He paid rent.
If they didn’t have an oven/stove for 6 weeks, they would have probably eaten out more, and had to buy extra microwaveable meals. $200 covers ONE WEEK, let alone 6 weeks. Bad call this time, JM!
I bought a brand new oven. Turns out the wires weren't secured properly and an exposed wire started burning a piece of plastic next to it. My dad, electrician, came over and looked at it. Said there was exposed wire loose and if it had touched the metal frame I would've been electrocuted. He fixed it all up and I notified the manufacturer, but it can happen just that easy.
I think I'd return it for a full refund. Unless it was too inconvenient. You got unlucky and lucky.
@@davidperez5089 It was two years old at this point and it took my Dad about 30 minutes to render it safe. All good now, just a story to tell.
Should got more
This is the most shocking case I've ever seen on the People's Court
🤣🤣🤣🤣
⚡️⚡️
@@TatewakiGamingthanks for the visual help! I’m a little slow!🤣🤣
😑⚡️😳
*slow golf clap* you did good, you did good 😂
It's the case of "Living on electric Avenue". 😂
Smh $200 is nothing . I cook over $500 in food in 2.5 months lol chill you could have gave him 500 my man had to go to a shelter. I would have made her pay for a hotel. One time my landlord had heat cut off we had him get us a hotel.
I would think that not having an oven makes the unit uninhabitable.
No. It just makes it a pain in the arse.
200 bucks wat?
$200 a joke
The message here is that if you rent and your oven breaks, Landlords know it's only a hit of about 100 per month. And if landlords leave electrical plates off plugs and have faulty wiring and electrocute people to the point where they call the EMT, no problem! This judge found no need for a penalty here either. Unreal decision.
I have an oven. Anyone want to rent it for 200 a month? WTF is wrong with this woman?
The judge be pissing me off smh
So because she used to be in a homeless shelter that was okay to only give them a toaster oven to use to prepare their food??? Like she should be grateful to have a roof over their heads but can't eat?? 😡
The defendant trying to make herself look good by saying she pulled the plantiff out of the homeless shelter.
So I'm trying to figure out how you roast a turkey in a toaster oven? 🤔
He said they cooked at his daughter's house
"It was a horrible judgment that I have ever seen."
This wasn't a fair judgment.
I think he should have received back half of his rent for the two months they didn't have an oven. So she should have awarded him 650 dollars. That would have been a lot fairer.
Wow!! 535 - no inspect report...on that premise I would question all her testimony. Give him something for his trouble...we'll soon see....
I hate when people bring God/Christianity into their mess. He sued because he was greedy not because he was trying to be a good Christian 🙄🙄 And she wasn't any better - because they were previously homeless she decided they could just give them any old thing and they had to take it. 👎👎
😮😊
Oh whatever
Completely agree.
Don’t make me smack the shit out ya
Always a red flag 🚩
Dissapointed he should have gotten the 5 grand he almost died
How does this woman not go over the paperwork before court???
Renters often so clueless about not paying rent during a contract period. She wasn’t a wonderful landlord as well. Toaster oven cheap shot when oven would need replaced
She has no business being a landlord
The Plaintiff sounds like an auctioneer....
The defendants are something else. He should’ve gotten more than $200. He was electrocuted and they never gave him a new stove. JM is soo cheap sometimes.
What he SHOULD have done was eat the cost to hire an electrician to put on paper there’s a severe electrical issue. Then he could’ve forced her to 1: fix it and 2: pay for their hotel in the meantime. But he didn’t. So unfortunately there’s only so much the judge can do
I'm not sure if anybody noticed but doesn't anyone feel like the plaintiff looks like Marty McFly.😅
Isn't this show produced in the US? They keep calling a stove an "oven" like they do in Canada. It is a stove and the oven is the baking compartment of the stove.
You call it a stove when you want to use the stove and an oven when you want to use the oven. If you want to use both you call it a stove. Easy 😅
No one is more pro landlord than me but even I think this landlord is insane not to give the man a stove when stove broke down
I really appreciate Judge’s line of questioning on the decision of Landlord to opt to not replace oven and let tenant live ANY amount of time without a stove. To withhold a basic need because of monetary discrepancies is EVIL. Do not choose money over your Humanity, cmon now
Plaintiff sounds like that guy from KING OF THE HILL 😂😂😂
Boomhauer!😂
Is anyone else wanting to see 'Throwback'
Wapner episodes for a change?
No
This judge always takes the side of the landlord.
And to educate all of you, slumlords do not put out money to get wiring corrected and never have it inspected till someone is hurt or there is a electrical fire. And the defendant put the blame on her father to decide to have the Plaintiff to use a toaster oven, instead of getting the poor wiring redone. Slum lord put the blame on her father for everything. She is the Slumlord. And then she blames her sister for the decision. Slumlord blames everyone in her family. Slumlord. And she did not grab the inspection results for she only did not see it, she decided to grab the inspection results of two other units and thought the judge would not read the documents. SLUMLORD! And the defendant owes the defendant. It was a good judgement.
I doubt you could call her a slumlord since she lives in the same building.
The refrigerator stopped working and the tenant couldn't even think to check the outlet and plug it in someplace else? Maybe the oven didn't work because the fuse tripped.
What a horrible land lord
Electrocuted means dead. I’d think Harvey Levin would know that. I like him. Apparently I’m smarter than him.
notice we're given and he was there November December and a week in January ,so she should have awarded him for,, compensation for the fact that it was not an oven.. More at the and convenience and that it should have been in oven to use.. Because the place came with a oven..
Electrocuted means death; shocked, means non-fatal. There's a big difference in the two words.
9:58 LOVE when they catch her offering FALSE EVIDENCE.
His accent was great!!
$200? What is this, 1952? The landlord was unethical and should have been made example of.
This case is shocking
That landlord is a slumlord 🤨 He should definitely get all his deposit & punitive damages, the judge’s decision on this is 💩
Some people should not be landlords. So people should not be tenants.
They both are at fault clearly. I wanna know why he had that many people in one apartment eww ! how uncomfortable and unsanitary.🤔 And why is she selling an apartment that is not up to part. I know she had to have violations on that place.🙄
The judge is so so wrong in this case! Shame on you JM!
“And he moved the heck out”😂😂😂
Seems like a bad resolution for the plaintiff. He had faulty oven that wasn't replace, faulty fridge and got electrocuted in a place with no inspection. To me, had a right to not pay rent in December or January, and to break the lease and not owe for February either.
The plaintiff looks like if Michael J Fox started smoking Marlboros at 16. Also, instead of coming in greedy and trying to back it up with religion he should’ve asked for pain and suffering for that shock and a rent rebate. He played himself.
Sometimes you just leave trash where you found it.
Rebecca Thayer should be ashamed of herself. Unconscionable! Disgusting landlord and poor excuse for a human being. Glad to hear she lives there. Deserves a taste of what she is dishing out.
I think that shock affected his memory.
The plaintiff still lost being greedy 200 bucks was a kick in the butt. The defendant is a liar and I believe she is part owner making decisions like that. They gave them folks scraps to live with on purpose.
This defendant is so phony.
I lived with my family and next door was the slum lord, for he had faulty wiring and a few years after we had an issue with the faulty wiring, the place caught fire and burnt down.
He lost me at "trying to be a good christian" ..what a farce
I'd swear I've seen this landlord as a defendant before. Does anyone else remember her?
Probably just a rerun
@@danir6695It's definitely a rerun, but I thought I'd seen her in a different lawsuit.
@@bhornannawindeedeigh5007ahh i see what you mean 😆
I was thinking the same thing! Now with this Defendant!
Her sis will get karma . We didn't mean for it to sound like that yes you did liar
Mrs doubfire is that you???? Lol 😆 shs reminds me of robin williams in that movie
I wonder why he isn't working so he can support himself. He looks able bodied. 🤷🏽♀️
Honey?
A toaster oven. Great landlord's
I always wondered what the circumstances are surrounding a person’s “homelessness.” He mentioned a daughter several times. I wonder what bridges him and his wife burned to not be able to stay with their daughter in her home? Or what mistakes they made as a couple that brought them to this unfortunate situation of not being able to have a home of their own.
Just curious…
Hate that word ... confront...
He was prejudged
I hope Harvey doesn’t ask a landlord vs tenant question
Yeah he SHOULD ask if its better to buy a dog or get one from a shelter
Or do auto shops take advantage of women.
How the hell does a homeless person have money to pay rent for 8 years?!!!
The defendant seems a little slow.
AVP 👽
I'd buy a "refiner or a mine
This was horrible
Just another slumlord to me. 😒
No GFCI outlets in the kitchen?
I have been shocked because I touched live electrical wires at least 100 times and all I did was yell and shut off the electricity. I never had to call an ambulance. And I have seen 100s of other people get shocked and they did the same thing. The plaintiff is a faker.
AVP 👽
Thanx buddy , for the chick 🐥 fil a / the other day /.
The landlords suck but he was delusional thinking he was going to $5000 back. 😆
The woman representing as a landlord appeared to be on some benzodiazepines responding in slow motion-mo. The landlord should have brought the apartment to spec regardless for the next tenant. Lazy landlord’s take another Xanax, time for night night
Judge was not very giving!
Idk if there were 15 people living in the house. Why the guy can't go live with them