Cutting Out a Middle Man
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 มี.ค. 2024
- The plaintiff is a real estate broker who showed the defendants an apartment that they moved into. He claims the defendants have not paid his commission yet, so he’s suing. The defendants argue they found the apartment online and not through the plaintiff. They don’t think they owe the plaintiff anything.
#PeoplesCourt #RealityTV #Court - บันเทิง
who else puts on People’s court everyday while doing random tasks around the house lol
Me I'm cooking as I'm watching it😅😊
Doing dishes rn 😂
While working 😂
Watching reruns all day everyday ❤😅
Cooking
If he is a realtor, he fully knows that there needs to be a contract.
Especially a broker.
This. You don’t do business without getting a signed contract at minimum of 3 or 6 months. Otherwise, why bother showing them anything FOR THIS EXACT REASON.
Can't transfer real property without a written contract.
He’s in on the scam. He works with the owners to get people in the place and then they pressure the tenant after the fact
*disclosure form!
Why didn’t he have a contract? Kind of sketch imo
Damn the defendants wife is ANNOYING!!!!!’
Yes!
I have a feeling that you find a lot of women annoying
@@ceilism I have a feeling you talk alot of shit on social media.
@@davidwhite3180lolz 😅
Af!
Natasha I mean Natalia lmao
That was strange lol
Ummm.... I heard that too. Did he not know his wife's name?
I knew a girl in high school whose name was Natalya but she went by Natasha. Could be a common nickname in their culture.
natasha is a nickname for Natalia, he prob calls her Natasha at home
Natasha is sort of like the informal version of Natalia. So he’s used to calling her Natasha in their home and around friends, but quickly corrected himself to Natalia out of respect for her and the situation.
Broker is out of luck. He should have had an agency disclosure signed and commission agreement signed. I was a realtor in my for almost 8 years, it’s nasty. And you will encounter a lot of Ali, Mohammed, Singh, Patel, yusef, and etc, and everyone claims to be the owner and a lot of shell companies, companies with post box. People be careful
I'm not even sure if the defendants believe their own lies
Nice to see both parties know how to dress for court. It’s refreshing.
Lmfao the broker an the manager are sketchy as hell. Why wasn't there a contract??😂
It said, No Fee Rentals!!
The plaintiff is well spoken and well organised the defendants are Ijust dodgy.
And annoying af
Everyone can stop thinking the guy got his wife's name wrong! Natasha is a nickname for Natalya.
IF their telling the truth, I really hope they get revenge on this Ollie dude
Their word against the Ollie dude with nothing in writing about it. Fat chance.
It is probably Ali.
He's a sales rep that works on commissions but doesn't want to pay commissions himself 🤔
So many of these cases involve people who seem to live on the edge of legitimacy, doing things with word-of-mouth with zero documentation (except some vaguely worded text messages).
The defendant didn’t know his wife’s name at first. Natasha was coming out of his mouth
I think he got it from "Ali" and since there's "no proof" he went after the tenants to get double paid
I can’t stand when they stand there and read from a paper. They wrote down what to say and it sounds so fake.
Rolled his eyes when judge said " no you don't get double your money"
He literally started to call his wife Natasha instead of Natalia. What's up with that??
Natasha is a nickname for Natalya in Russian.
When she said “OLLIE OLLIE UMPHREYY.” I lost it!!!!😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Im surprised at the verdict considering there was no contact
Absolutely, especially one having to do with real estate
They had an agreement in writing "text"
Text proves there was a verbal agreement
Exactly. I think she was wrong in this case .
I don’t understand either as sometimes she says text aren’t a contract with tenant situations so how is this any different
4:48 He got his own wife's name wrong...yikes!
I heard that! I wondered if her name is actually Natasha and changed it for TV. lol
@@christibarrick1768 They announce if a someone don't want their name used or if name is different from paper work
I think Natasha is a common nickname for Russian women named Natalya. I knew a girl in high school for whom that was the case.
@@amandadonaldson8748 thanks for this... It explains a lot for me
If you're doing business for more that a couple hundred dollars, there should be a contract.
No written commission agreement, no commission. How did he win?
Texts are legal written amendments. Once the defendant asked him in text if he had to pay a commission and the plaintiff said “ok” it became apart of their agreement.
The Plaintiff is pissed.
I even put my phone in my pocket and listen to it.
They're coming for you Ali 🤨
Good for washing dishes. Just prop the phone up or lay it down to just listen.
Didn't have a commission agreement? Sounds like they really did lure them in
defendant says he works on commission but wants to stiff the real estate broker? Wow! His morals are a bit bent. Plaintiff should have a contract. Who doesn’t do that?
Um, how did he mess up his wife's name? I can't believe Judge Milian glanced over that!😳
I disagree with the judge on this one I completely believe the defendants when they say that they were told that the property management would pay the fee, I know the plaintiff had the text from the defendant but the way it was worded to me sounded like the defendant was trying to get a clear answer on if there would be a fee.
100% agree with this. The defendants got stiffed, pure and simple. This broker is a straight up slime ball.
It’s unethical, but there is no contract! Do you pay everyone who you promise to work with?
He still moved into the apartment and completely lied about it. They didn't even try to argue that, except for the wife saying she was running to catch the bus instead of running from him. They should pay
What do brokers do? I understand realtors when you are buying a home but just showing someone an apartment to rent is worth thousands of dollars? It sounds like a scam.
Brokers are just as useless as realtors.
EXACTLY... both are dying professions, going the way of Travel agents soon@@jackdaniels5134
@@jackdaniels5134more useless
They are bottom feeders
He really called his wife Natasha 😂
In Massachusetts - there’s something called a disclosure form. It discloses that the client understands that the agent is working on their behalf and will be paid by the client, regardless if there’s a sale or not. It’s the FIRST thing an agent does! I’m surprised that in the state of New York, that it’s not legally required. I don’t think the broker should have won.
The broker should of had it in writing no contract, no agreement to pay for fees and ect
Oh my gosh! The woman with the accent never stops talking while everyone else is talking!U
I have always had a contract for EVERYTHING. My son's engine in his car blew up and I had a nice spare car. I said, "I'll sell you this car at a fair price if you'll just sign the contract." He looked at it and said, "Dad it say's $1?" I said, "Sign it or I can get a lot more" LOL
He did and started crying with appreciation. More of the story he had to have a contract bill of sale for a tag and I make contracts for everything.
Broker fee is an useless fee, it’s a way to steal from tenants.
No contract no fee …
Right here!! 😂😂
I have a feeling that quite a few people add information to make the situation sound worse than it was.
The defendant's wife lays out his clothes for him every morning.
Did anyone notice how the defendant held the "gate" for the woman he was with. GENTLEMEN
We don't accept table abuse in this court, don't slap your table.
He should have had a contract. They need to sue Ali for giving them false hope, although I don't know why they would think that the manager would pay the fee. It is obvious he lied to them and then brought up the fee later.
They scammed the rarealtor. But got away with it because the realtor did not bother to get a signed contract it’s immoral but it’s legal
Natasha seems to be the one making the decisions.
Natalia** lol the husband called his wife the wrong name 😂
Never loan money that you aren't prepared to see again.
Wrong case
Hurst he got his money
Plaintiff looking down at his script too often. Shoulda had the long bs story memorized.
Omg I commented this. Drives me nuts.
people gotta be making all money in new york with that broker crap. i can see why people be staying in illegal apartments
But judge why was it listed as “no fee” that’s the part that makes the defendants wife explanation plausible……
Bottom line. Verbal contract with proof. Pay the man! You tried to get over, it was wrong! Pay the man!
The plaintiff is greedy.
9:03 the guy in the brown ish shirt with the blue strings/earbuds around his neck like above the defendants wife's left shoulder... does he keep falling asleep? he talks/mouths to someone off screen.. i'm assuming with someone who works for the show and they asked if hes ok... anyone else notice this?
The entire gallery looks sleepy
I’m confused as to why sometimes text messages aren’t viewed as a contract, but man the defendants wife is annoying and should lose as it’s all messy
3:22 why do that?? So rude 😐
Exactly. Frustrated that he was actually expected to have those texts in his phone.
Oh my gosh the plaintiff is making the story so long it's taking forever to tell the damn story!
that women is annoyinggggggg
I believe the defendants they have answers to all her questions
They didn't have an answer for lying and telling him that they weren't going to move into the apartment.
First to comment. 🎉 yeah. Love this show. Miss it.
10 minutes in and the plaintiff is shady AF. Ali isn't there anymore...more lies. These people got scammed by the wanna-be gangster Ali and the plaintiff.
As a New Yorker “no fee” apartment means you don’t pay any money for upkeep of the common area
WRONG!!!
Wrong X 2
It's a good thing they work the shifts they do, else this would be divorce court instead of the peoples court. The defendants screwed up, but as for the plaintiff, I don't like him.
@5:45 wife interrupts with foolishness.
Before I hear the verdict my answer would be that technically there was no contract since there is no price set. Even if he said I supposed we have to pay you a commission that doesn't mean they agree to pay 5k. Now if he can prove that is what the would have gotten and told the guy it would be 5k then he is on the hook for paying. But I think with no fixed discussion of what the commission would be...There is no contract. What if the guy came in and said it was 50k?
And what kind of professional...Especially in NY would not have a contract stating the terms of their deal?
How is she not going to question the fact the defendant got his own wife's name wrong 😳
Ok I googled it.. apparently Natasha is a varient of Natalia. Interesting
Thank you:)
Was the defendant his client or the landlord?
Who's Natasha?👀
I kind of believe the defendant. If there’s no contract between the broker and the potential tenant, they shouldn’t be able to collect two or three months in advance for a brokers fee once they moved in . Sounds sketchy to me.
They stayed because thier. Landlord gave them a better deal
2500 for a day's work not bad
Who’s Natasha 🧐
OK WELL AFTER LISTENING TO THE ENTIRE CASE HONESTLY I DO BELIEVE BOTH SIDE THE DEFENDANTS WERE BROUGHT IN UNDER FALSE PRETENSES THEY THOUGHT THEY THEY MIGHT HAVE TO PAY UNTIL MGN "SAID" WE'LL TAKE CARE OF HIM / IT. EITHER WAY I'M W/ THE PLAINTIFF I WOULDN'T CARE WHO PD JUST GIVE ME MY $$$$. I HOPE THAT THE DEFENDANTS SUED & WON TO BE REIMBURSED GOOD CASE
I don’t care.. dislike realtors and lawyers .. a bunch of arrogant self righteous liars who don’t even worth their salt .
Watch her FACE..
SHE WEARS HER !!!!! ON HER FACE. FUNNY HOW THE FACE WEARS HER ATTITUDE.
Alledegy
Doug is two faced.
Naw. He is loud and proud about who he is and he certainly doesn’t hide it or pretend to be something in front of your face that he changes behind your back.
I'm sorry no disrespect to the lady not tryin to be really rude but the lady talk way to much😒😆
People don't work for free
Wrong verdict. He should have had a contract.
You can enter into a contract through text an agreement
@@MichaelJones-yx4zv true but imo the text didn't establish a meeting of the minds, for example even the fee amount was never disclosed
@@lukerinderknecht2982 the defensive didn't disagree with the amount
Justified verdict in my humble opinion..What the defendant's did was wrong..
Thank you for sharing your infinite knowledge of contracts, real estate, commission sales, and everything else under the sun.
Your comment provides the algorithm with substance to then go and promote this channel to others. Normally, that's a good thing, but with you it seems weird as you are known to falsely cry about racism here.
@@Meister_de_Nicts😂😂😂 what
@@Meister_de_Nicts😂 you sound a little obsessed
@Meister_de_Nicts why are you so obsessed with Adrian
🤡
Cuban judge haaaaas to interpt with OBVIOUS things throwing peoples thought process off
No, it's in the United States; she's an Amereican judge.
Are you American? If so that explains your awful grammar
@@TooLooze her ethnicity is cuban
@@user-jb1tw3qi6d Racist.
Adrian?
Plaintiff should sue the property mngmnt.
Damn the defendants wife is ANNOYING!!!!!’