@@philindeblanc Darwin's theory of evolution is backed by tons of evidence from biology, genetics, and fossils, and it's a key part of modern science. The plagiarism claims and court stuff don’t really change how solid the theory is!
@@philindeblanc Not really. The theory's solid foundation in evidence speaks for itself, and the plagiarism claims don’t actually undermine its importance in science. In other words, it's up to you if you want to believe modern "science" as you call it
@@HideInKilimanjaro79 We have been conditioned in university classes to believe that a theory is more than a idea. The most important thing in science to keep in mind is that : 1. correlation is not causation. 2. Anything out of the scientific method is literally not scientific. Numerous scientific theories are completely made up with amazing stories . Darwin would be one of them. Spectroscopy would be another.
Great video my dude! I have a lot of friends from Ecuador and they're great people!
Hello
Darwin's theory of evolution lost in court 2 times for plagiarism, and if you do any research will know how lame the theory is.
@@philindeblanc Darwin's theory of evolution is backed by tons of evidence from biology, genetics, and fossils, and it's a key part of modern science. The plagiarism claims and court stuff don’t really change how solid the theory is!
@@HideInKilimanjaro79 It does, and further shines a light on modern "science"
@@philindeblanc Not really. The theory's solid foundation in evidence speaks for itself, and the plagiarism claims don’t actually undermine its importance in science.
In other words, it's up to you if you want to believe modern "science" as you call it
@@HideInKilimanjaro79 We have been conditioned in university classes to believe that a theory is more than a idea. The most important thing in science to keep in mind is that : 1. correlation is not causation. 2. Anything out of the scientific method is literally not scientific.
Numerous scientific theories are completely made up with amazing stories . Darwin would be one of them. Spectroscopy would be another.
@@HideInKilimanjaro79 We thought it was backed by tons of evidence, all based off false info.