N Scale Layout Update 27 - Connecting Sections 2 to 4
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ส.ค. 2024
- Connection sections 3 and 4 to section 2 ended up being a big plaster job.
Follow on Instagram:
/ nscaler454
Visit www.Nscaler454.com to buy my own 3D printed parts
Shapeways Shop:
www.shapeways.com/shops/nscal...
If you would like to support the channel:
www.paypal.me/SS454LS6
/ nscaler454
Woodland Scenics Rock Mold Video:
• Woodland Scenics Rock ...
Amazon Affiliate Links:
Plaster of Paris 4 lb: amzn.to/3O8HDbf
3 pack Molds: amzn.to/3Loa2Hd
Embankment Molds: amzn.to/3Jb6sye
Random Molds: amzn.to/34w17mp
Creek Bank Mold: amzn.to/34w7Yfu
Music:
Track: Waves Music composed and recorded by Oak Studios Creative Commons - Attribution ND 4.0 • [No Copyright Music] W... - แนวปฏิบัติและการใช้ชีวิต
![[ไฮไลต์] "บิว" ภูริพล บุญสอน วิ่ง 100m ชาย รอบคัดเลือก | โอลิมปิก 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3kUSMfgtQ5s/mqdefault.jpg)
In my opinion, I think 🤔 you should put in a small arch bridge on the back mainline by cutting only a small section of foam . By doing this …. You can have a steam to a small pond and have your bridges that you want 👍 ! In this case it looks real and you can still have everything that you want 😎 !!
hello Nscaler454 & it's is Randy and i like yours video is cool Thanks Nscaler 454 Friends Randy
Looks great nice planning. You can put the bridge on the mainline as well as the switching line. Just carry the brook or creek right across the layout to the front of the facia .
I'm all for the low bridge over the mainline!
My thoughts would be putting the bridge on the mainline (as you suggested) and cascade a waterfall off your step-up to appear as a waterfall from the upper level. This would allow you to have a pooling area at the bridge and then reduce it down as it runs off the layout like a stream. Possible viaduct on the top level could be added also.
I came here to say the same thing.
Add the bridges! Would be a cool creek / wetlands area
This is a different view of laying track and for me is easy to follow and covers many points...great video.
Thanks 👍
He's got a nice style and I've enjoyed his videos quite a bit!
Good job in the N scale layout, flex tracks and switch Peco.
The tracks of my layout, Atlas, Bachmann and Life Like, 93/4" curve.
Code 80 the Peco tracks.
Yes to the bridge idea! Love the vids. 👍
The main line in the back with the switch look ead in front looks really good.
Hi Nscaler454 , I do like the idea for a bridge on the main line. A bridge on the branch line sounds good also. So why not do both. You’re making good progress. Thanks for the update. Have a good weekend. 😎😎 👍
Yup to bridge & pond...
Fantastic N scaler looks great can't wait to see more progress on this one. Great video well done.
Dear Nscaler, considering the elongated rock face on the layout will work as a natural retaining wall, one can anticipate such a level drop will create a voluminous amount of seepage water. Such water can of course be accumulated in culverts. However, where the ‘wall’ is a rock face, seepage will occur where the several ground water layers have been exposed. Such seepage will lead to a rather significant stream of surface water, either in a ditch or brook. As long as you make a small indent between tracks and rock face and on the longest ends rather dry, transforming into ever more wet towards the ‘low point,’ synonymical to where you planned the bridge, I humbly think the scene will explain itself. Not that a culvert wouldn’t be suitable, but as such a large rock face can produce significant amounts of water runoff, a bridge, if only a small one would be preferred above a narrowing culvert, with all its resistance, hence restrictions, and possible impact on the roadbed. Hope this helps. Cheerio
Thanks for the reply. It's like you are in my mind because that is what I was thinking too haha.
NICE UP DATE THX FOR SHARING LOOKS GREAT.😊😊👍👍
Looks like a job well done!!
Really well done! Thanks for explaining!
Great job, also gave e a few ideas
Do both!
There's an idea!
I think a bridge so close to a rock formation would look kind of unrealistic; in real life if a mainline would need to be elevated over some water filled depression the railroad would probably create a fill with suitable drainage.
The culvert option is the way to go. Just my two cents.
realism is definitely important to me, but not a hard rule. I had the same thought process. A small pond would likely be filled instead of a bridge going over it.
He could do a marsh or wetlands with a fill for the track and the culvert maybe?
2 bridges?
idea sounds great, but why not cut open the whole section and also put a bridge on the back track. so a higher and a lower one, would i think also look great. then put in a canal maybe. anyway looking forward to the next one!
Too much redoing of work to cut out the top level haha.
@@nscaler454 well its a model railroad, there is always work :P ;)
First !
Sounds like you don't have a plan. Just piecing it together. Gotta have a scale plan on paper to see the problem areas.
I have a plan. You can see it in a bunch of my videos. I just have found the plan always changes when it gets built.
@@nscaler454I think that's what happens. Best layed plans of mice and...