If the Japanese were transported to Somalia they would turn it into Japan. If the Somalis were transported to Japan they would make it Somalia. Transport Sub-Saharan Africans to the UK they will transform it into Africa. Transport Muslims to the UK, they will make it an Islamic country. UK politicans have not figured this out yet.
As a child in the 60's I thought how fantastic it was the Peace Corps taught desperate people how to dig wells for water. When those wells ran out I wondered why they didn't use the knowledge and dig new ones for themselves, I heard a thousand excuses, then I grew up and no longer wonder.
We still pay for water that actually come out of taps (😮) as shown in begging adverts since the 50s. However, the recipients break the taps and allow the water to gash out. May be they should lustened how to turn them on and off !
Years ago in a dutch game show a dutch family was placed in an african community. People there had to walk several hours each day to fetch water after the only tap in their village stopped working. The dutch guy took one look at it and fixed it in 5 minutes
They had roads and even a railroad in the Congo when the French were there... now there's dirt and rocks. They learned nothing in 1000 years but it's everyone elses fault, not theirs.
At this point, I know I'm being lied to about my people, my heritage, my history. Me and anyone who looks like me. Thank you, sir. For daring to speak truth. I will not have my ancestors dragged through the dirt because they achieved. And because the ancestors of others couldn't.
Your Ancestors are ignorant, evil hate filled deluded humans like you. Neanderthals are in your genome because you a caveman savage. Most scientist would Debunk this buck tooth racist liar filling up your swine bred rock head with lies. Ask the POS for evidence to his claims!!! DumbA$$ RACE IS NOT BIOLOGICAL.👈💩🤡👹
Yes, there are differences but the difference btwn intelligent black & white people are less than the differences btwn an intelligent black n a black moron and there is adifftence btwn a intelligent white man n a white moron. ...Who u want as your neighbour? Nelson Mandela or a white scaghead thug?
@gerryatrix74 The Irony being that the Christian Conservative doesn't see this information as controversial. We are still humans after all. To the liberal however.
@@simonwoods8809 Yes, just as the so called Muricans were working with a land mass inhabited by millions of people and plenty of natural resources and also imported a very large population to freeload off of which they ironically wish to complain about today for being "lazy" and "chaotic".
I don't necessarily disagree, and there are certainly different races, but to claim that we are different species is factually wrong. groups of animals are usually called the same species if they have viable outcome regardless of the gender of each party. clearly, whites can have children with blacks, so we are the same species.
@@Galdring We should stop playing games with these labels and simply use "breed". Humanity has multiple breeds, and they can inter-breed, but a pitbull is not acceptable in the golden-retriever dog-park. A border collie is FAR smarter than a bulldog. Etc. etc.
@@c3bhm - good idea. I'll use "Breed" from now. However! - it is stupid to not understand that the Individual-Differences ― are More Important than the Average Differences. And I have the solution.
When at Uni in the 60,s in central London there were large numbers of Africans in the class. One of the lecturers confided to me " I dont know what we are going to do with these fellows" { the Africans}, as they could ot pass the exams.
I think the unfortunate answer was to punt and bring more of them in. The powers that be have decided that throwing human waves of White women at them will eventually breed the Homo Erectus out of them.
Many years ago my father taught maths and mechanical engineering at Borden Army school which took in army students from across the Commonwealth. He was told that when it came to exams he was never to fail those from sub-Saharan Africa.
@@SonyaPorter-n9q Not only don't fail them if you have a teenaged daughter you're supposed to not mind if the dindos defile her. Building that new race of Eurasian-Negroids just smart enough to do manual labor.
What Science has suspected all along and is now known. There are distinct differences between the Human sub groups and not purely skin colour and hair structure. Indeed, in hindsight the idea that the only differences should be these minor ones is quite ridiculous. The very fact that sub-Saharan Africans did not evolve intellectually beyond the 'Stone Age Level' was not pure coincidence. It was genetically predetermined.
Yet our political elite seem to think it a good idea to bring millions of them into our country, regressing our society and coercing our own youth to fall in with their substandard outlook on decent living, they refuse to acknowledge our laws and rules, that is why all African countries are shitholes policed by the armies.
Have you ever seen the skulls from the 1930s, of the three distinct "races" of humans? The classification as sub-species were Caucasoid, Mongoloid, and Negroid. We can still identify each race by their skull shape and brain case volume. Negroid is 20% less than Caucasoid and 25% less than Mongoloid. These sub-species are now known as Caucasian, Asian and Sub-Saharan African. (Negro).. Now "science" says, we are all the same. My experience with black Americans says NO we are not the same species.
Not exactly, sub Saharans still have many hypersapiens anatomical features compared with other population like extremely prominent foreheads. So in a sense they evolved further in being homo sapiens than everyone else
@@vaevictis2789 yeah, north of the equator are more of mongrels than africa, we're homo-sapien + others (neanderthal an the like). There's even an east/west split of ancestral mixing with regional species as there were different hominids in europe and asia to interbreed with. So first guy is half right as different hominids evolved and adapted in the northern hemisphere that we engaged in gene mixing with an those offspring with better genetic combinations/adaptations survived, though he is wrong about devolution thing. The main instance of devolution i know about is when scientists sequenced a chickens dna; they found suppressed genes for teeth and tails (which became suppressed after the fall of dinosaurs) and they forced those genes to express in the chicken which grew teeth and a tail. Humans do this too in instances of a person being VERY hairy since birth, though to call that devolution is a stretch as things like this happen in case a species enters into an environment where those 'lost traits' are needed again. These old traits will add to any new traits that've come about in the 10,000s + years since they were suppressed
It's always been strange to me that people can easily accept that different breeds of animals, dogs for example, can have very different characteristics other than obvious physical differences. Yet when it comes to humans this whole idea goes out the window. To me at least it would be strange if different races of humans didn't have differing behavioural characteristics.
It's like believing that, if you place a greyhound among poodles, it will increase its intelligence; and, if you place a poodle among greyhounds, it will make it run faster.
Anyone with any acceptable level of intelligence and logic knows this already, the evidence is obvious and overwhelming. This explains a lot about the woke left in terms of intelligence and logic.
At the moment we live in a world in which the most desirable genes are passed along the least. Intelligent people not having as many kids, pop decline in the West. It is one of the many many growing issues that is going to make life unbearable in the future.
Agree, the most competent and intellectually superior are choosing not to procreate. Many of my most intelligent and clever friends are alone and not having kids. On the other hand I see many people with zero skills as parents or as human beings in general having kids by the bucket load. I'm not even to get into other races.
Dogs are a single species, yet noone doubts the differences in temperament, aggression and intelligence between; a border collie, Staffordshire bull terrier or a Pekingese.
Indeed, but won't be said on the BBC or Channel 4, or in the Guardian. You only have to look at the behaviour of some of them to see where they originate from.
That immediately excludes all leftists, many of whom have successfully been processed by the entirely feminized education system, which won't allow us to think badly of others. We'll be made to stand in the corner if we do. (Or is that now also considered horrendous abuse?)
Lol, that is astoundingly misinformed. The NOK culture smelted Iron before any Europeans. Black Africans were carrying out mumification before any euroepans or asians. How gullible can some people be. Black Africans founded Egypt. Before you say ' No it was levantines', visually inspect the Narmer Pallette and notice the difference in appearance or physical difference between the Pharoah and the conquered delta egyptians. This old man is here spewing hate against the genes that gave him life. May he remain cursed.
@@lcship1905 We all are , well any of us that have any intelligence, integrity, common sense and logic. All traits that are no longer regarded as palatable by the political elites.
Lol, that is astoundingly misinformed. The NOK culture smelted Iron before any Europeans. Black Africans were carrying out mumification before any euroepans or asians. How gullible can some people be. Black Africans founded Egypt. Before you say ' No it was levantines', visually inspect the Narmer Pallette and notice the difference in appearance or physical difference between the Pharoah and the conquered delta egyptians. This old man is here spewing hate against the genes that gave him life. May he remain cursed.
Be careful Simon. Yes you are most probably right. But being right will not save you from being cancelled.. And remember it is possible for a sub Saharan African "male" to become the BBC'S women's footballer of the year.
Of course he is right, there are books around still on these studies. I recall some research by a Chinese guy, talking about the skull and face shape, monolid eyes etc.
@@gwenlillianlondon3772 This is standard forensic science. Recently in New Zealand, a five hundred year old European female skull was discovered. No one has denied its racial and gender classification. In stem science that is forensics, in social science that is racist and sexist.
99.9% of it. The other 1% is the European dna he has as a Carribbean Windrush type, that 1% allows him to at least button his shirt and and put on his tie, but other than that he's a nematoid
As an Electronics Engineer all my life, working with many other people sharing the same level on Knowlege in different situations, I have NEVER known anyone other than a European to do my type of work. Throughout School, College etc. None other than Europeans studied this, WHY?
@@theenglishman8668does this now explain the traditional segregation and attitudes in the USA for the last 250 years? Is the rest of the world now ready to get it?
That is a rather simpleton view about it. You need to consider how Europeans and most Asians lived. They either lived in tundras, deserts, extreme weather, whether it’s storms or droughts. If you live in tropical and near tropical temperate climates, you have a much easier time. That’s why we all like to visit tropical islands or equatorial countries because it’s a calm and relaxing place. Sometimes you get some brutal weather in the form of hurricanes and monsoons.But you have to be inventive if you live in these harsher environments, or you will die of starvation, dehydration, famine, or exposure. You have to learn how to plan in advance to grow crops in the summer and to store things for the winter or you and your children will die. And it’s not like every European or Asian was smart enough to figure this out on their own, it’s usually the few very smart, inventive people that really figured this out and spread the knowledge. These differences and how to live thousands of years ago let a giant divergences that you see today. I can take somebody from Kenya and easily teach them how to be an engineer and you could take a person from Norway, who doesn’t do anything much at all, but live off the benefits of western culture and society. This is not to say that all humans are genetically the same, and that all cultures are equal, but the science is constantly evolving on these topics and I think it’s pretty presumptuous of you to think that people who live in other places are less capable.
@@googull4778thank you, even if we are genetically varying and not all the same doesn’t mean that one party isn’t able to exceed the other and vice versa. Variability in species is always present, there’s stupid and intelligent people, no matter the race. Instead of fixating on race and the division it causes in our society we should rather be concentrating on the idiots that run the world, many of which neither possess intelligence, emotional nor logical alike and only care for themselves and their greed. To reduce all of these bad traits to a genetic cause would stunt such incentive in removing the actual problems out of the governments, it’s not about race or gender, it’s about the individual themself and we need to do better but as long as people are unhappy about their own lives they won’t be able to properly look past the edge of their own plate. People are forced to only think about survival instead of actually living, when was there actual good news on TV or radio? Or on social media in general? It’s meant to make you unhappy and distracted, because that’s how they (media in general) make money. work work work, consume this, consume that, until you can retire and die of health complications that stem from the processed, unreal food we’re fed while a Bill Gates or Jeff Bezos definitely dont eat a Beyond Meat burger in their spare time. Inflation which made everything 5x more expensive while salaries haven’t really increased. Misinformation in media about health in general, the DEA and its corruption, the US healthcare system in general. And the rich are profiting off of it. Causation and Correlation are important, it’s not the black guy sitting in the parking lot that’s making everyone’s life miserable, he’s also just suffering under the 7 deadly sins many tyrants are still committing for profit.
It’s worth pointing out that the humans that came out of Africa somewhere around 70,000 years ago were not anatomically modern sub Saharan Africans. As modern sub Saharan Africans are a result of interbreeding with this relic hominid “ghost species”. If we all descended from sub Saharan Africans, then all people on earth would have genes from this “ghost species”, which we don’t, and would also have relatively recent sub Saharan African genetics, which we don’t. The group of humans formerly known as “Cro magnon”, which are now known as “western hunter gatherers” were living in Western Europe up to 35,000 years ago and were almost genetically identical with modern Western European populations. Which is why the whole cheddar man debacle is really amusing. Because he was a western hunter gatherer and his remains date to somewhere around 10,000 years ago and despite being almost genetically identical to modern Europeans, they want you to believe that he and his western hunter gatherer counterparts were “black”. So not only are they trying to mislead people into thinking that western hunter gatherers were sub Saharan Africans, they also want you to believe that black people magically transformed into white Europeans in the space of just 10,000 years. Which is hilarious. It’s also worth pointing out that western hunter gatherers all had blue eyes. It’s strange, because they try and say that the genetics for blue eyes originated in the Black Sea region somewhere around 8,000 years ago. But yet all western hunter gatherers had blue eyes and they were living in Western Europe 35,000 years ago. I really don’t see any mechanism by which sub Saharan Africans migrate into Europe 70,000 years ago and by 35,000 years ago there’s already a population of blue eyed, almost genetically identical Western European people living there, with no recent sub Saharan genetic ancestry in their genome. The reality is, all the different groups of people on earth are varying degrees of ancient and modern hominids that interbred with each other. But the way the “out of Africa” theory is always portrayed in the mainstream is that sub Saharan Africans migrated out of Africa and in 70,000 years they magically transformed into all the other people on earth. Thus presenting this narrative that we’re all descended from sub Saharan Africans. But it’s just not true. In fact, I would say that it’s one of the greatest lies that we have been sold in the last century and there is certainly an ulterior motive behind trying to make people believe it.
Inbreeding over the millennia probably had some influences too concerning dominance of local eye and hair colours and other 'inner and outer features' (Genotype & Phenotype)
Very well thought out! Also worth thinking about convergence DNA evolution, where similar or sometimes identical portions of DNA independently evolve with no direct link in lineage.
This video will do very badly with the algorithm because the tribe doesn’t want their propaganda to become ineffective when it comes to coercing European women into choosing a specific type of non-European man…
He has twisted this study to promote his racial ideology, rather than present the nuance that is implicit in evolutionary history. The "super-archic" (I'm pretty sure Robert sephr made this term) species was around at the same time as the species which left Africa to become later Neanderthals. He's purposely misconstruing the science, implying that Africans only come directly from this super archaic species, thus suggesting that they're not related to the rest of humanity. He is literally dehumanising Africans. This is not the science. Homo-sapiens evolved in Africa and mixed with some species and the homo-sapiens that left Africa outcompeted the Neanderthals. Homo-sapiens push the Neanderthals to extinction at the edge of Europe. Where is this nuance? Where is this passion from Simon? Nah he'd rather put down a race of people than promote actual science
@@r1234233 1) There is no one study - it is ALL studies in genetics that confirm this. 2) LOL Robert Sepher did not invent the term 'super-archaic' - it is the standard term used by all geneticists to describe DNA that Homo Sapiens inherited from an unknown hominid that existed very far back in time. 3) It is you who appears to have misconstrued the science. If the OOA theory is true (many geneticists now doubt the validity of it however), then sub-saharan Africans mated with this unknown hominid species sometime within the last 70,000 years, as this DNA is not present in any other population. So this mixing occurred after the first homo sapiens left Africa (again, this is only assuming that OOA is the correct theory). Even if OOA if not actually correct, we still know for a fact that sub-Saharan Africans mated with this species in the fairly recent past, as the amounts of the 'ghost' DNA is very high (~20%), compared with Denisovan (~10%) or Neanderthal DNA (~6%) in other populations.
Thank you for saying out loud what most of us know in our hearts to be true, and at the same time i celebrate all the wonderful diversity of our species and wish to preserve and enhance all cultures, in their own lands!
I have no problem accepting that homo sapien might have sub variants and dont think there is any moral negatives to exploring that. It doesn't really change the moral imperative of treating everyone as equal, which we do NOT do anymore. Certain demographics seem to always have the moral high ground no matter what they destroy. This is wrong and cant continue if we want to live in a just world.
Individuals should be judged individually, but collectives should now be judged as collectives, and if we do this we will see that certain collectives are 'civilizational invalids', bringing destruction wherever they go as a collective. But we are currently trapped in a cult of Cultural Marxism that refuses to allow us to talk honestly about reality, and in the meantime society gets destroyed (to the benefit of a certain other group that we're never allowed to talk about).
Treating everyone equally does not mean providing equal outcomes however, does it. This rational approach means that one subspecies will prevail. What's that called?... Oh, yes... evolution.
@@Occident."Facts" are only "commonly agreed opinions" and can change with the seasons and political climate.....they usually have less to do with universal truth and more to do with narrative control
@@Occident. "Facts" are only "commonly agreed opinions" anyway and change with the funding, they can't be relied on if your looking for absolute truths....
I still don't understand why the Elites want us to mate with Homo Erectus....at least based on advertisements and modern media. Maybe they want a dumb slave class.
He has twisted this study to promote his racial ideology, rather than present the nuance that is implicit in evolutionary history. The "super-archic" (I'm pretty sure Robert sephr made this term) species was around at the same time as the species which left Africa to become later Neanderthals. He's purposely misconstruing the science, implying that Africans only come directly from this super archaic species, thus suggesting that they're not related to the rest of humanity. He is literally dehumanising Africans. This is not the science. Homo-sapiens evolved in Africa and mixed with some species and the homo-sapiens that left Africa outcompeted the Neanderthals. Homo-sapiens push the Neanderthals to extinction at the edge of Europe. Where is this nuance? Where is this passion from Simon? Nah he'd rather put down a race of people that promote actual science
I was never 'racist' (racist realist) until I encountered multiculturalism. Multiculturalism isn't a harmonious single society. It's different societies geographically placed together.
true, please type in donald trump celtic germanic roots and you will hear the gaelic cultural values , I am scottish from my mother's side living in holland
Ha ha ha 😅😅😅 good point !! I see em all the time whilst driving my lorry and they scare me !!! If anything awful happened , twould always be MY fault ! These people have a flippin death wish 😮
But I am being told that we all descend from Africa and that there were no other species anywhere in the world ? Of course I am 63 and so I was taught different from history books and tv programmes back in the day and I still believe that which I was taught years ago because it makes more sense to me than today's line that we all come from Africa .
Darwinian theory. Do you not believe that tortoises and turtles all came from a single source? That explains why land animals in Australia, and other isolated land masses, are unique. But humans migrated there from another source.
lindaa, I expect you mean no other *human* species anywhere in the world. But why would there be? A species must start somewhere, and so there will most likely be only one source.
They say evolution magically ceased to affect us the minute homo sapiens split, ignoring that factors like the climate (planning over the winter to survive it vs not having to care about that in tropical regions for example).
I lived in the ghetto for 10 years in a major US city. Something is certainly different between blacks and Whites. Impulse control could be the major difference.
It has been challenged following new discoveries in north eastern Europe. The info has been removed from yt, but the research was conducted by a German anthropologist.
Simon, interesting but I believe your analysis might have overlooked the case concerning the present Foreign Secretary, Lammy, who seems to have acquired the knowledge from some secret source that it is possible for a male to grow a cervix together with a few other spurious perceptions including numeration. Is it possible there is another sub gene pool with these rare and exceptional abilities?
Maybe so, but strange and missing genes of different regions don't compare with the moron gene and far too many promoted beyond their abilities seem to carry those genes... 😂
@@SashaLea-g5j That's a new word for me. No, not an edgelord, just someone trying to awaken people out of following the unscientific, insane, harmful official narrative that trampled on our human rights and did way more harm than good.
I remember browsing through the reference library of my town in the mid 1970's and coming across this book, which I don't even remember it's title. The essence or substance of it's content was to compare photo's of the different face's of African peoples to photos of different species of apes and monkeys! I will wager that book has been taken off the shelf since that time!
This explains to me as a 62 Yr old the reason that before the open door policies now adopted as a monoculture the UK achieved the near impossible so many times
It's been known for decades that there are real physical differences between races of humans, it has not been politically correct to say so. Anyone spotted any Greenlanders winning running races, or white men the 100m ?
Or Africans inventing F1, cars in general, bridge technology, the arts, classical music, well pretty much anything above a mud hut and basic hunting tools, but they can run fast, a handy trick with only a spear as defence
Even within the black race there are different efficiencies: Blacks from American continent (originated from W. Africa and the Gulf of Guinea) are good in short distance fast racing, while blacks from Ethiopia and Kenya are good in long distance racing!
Looks like the Neanderthals were probably better educated than you were too. I'm sure they were better at spelling and grammar than you are even though writing had yet to be invented. Compared to you they must have been very clever indeed!
@lesleycronin832 Actually being good at athletics is more useful than going to the moon. Going to the moon is the most useless endeavor in human history
There are differences between human beings for sure. Differences in IQ, physique etc. What's rather disturbing is how some people find joy in looking down on others because of these differences. No one chose to be born a certain race. So let people be. We'll all die anyway so smart thing to do is enjoy life and do good in the best way you can.
I am 65 yo, and as a youngster in the '70's I accepted the general view that everyone was as capable as anybody else but that colonialism kept certain populations from evolving... Then acquiring a critical mind through scientific training made me ponder about the discrepancies, but obviously I must have been a racist...😐
@@ianxyoutube the whole of known history sets examples of better thinking, greater controlled aggression, inventiveness, adaptation to harsh climates, genuine seafaring. Common writing and counting systems. Philosophy, invention, genuine science, engineering, farming, animal husbandry and more... Just how much of any of that originated in Sub saharan Africa or Australia and several other places that eventually and clearly benefitted from thousands of years of emire building and colonial contact?
Wouldn’t it be grand if ideology wasn’t driving science, so that these differences which are obvious to anyone who’s lived long and been everywhere, or who simply possesses a skeptical rationalism, could be openly admitted and our societies could act accordingly?
Nnaaaa mate! Haven't you heard, that they invented the internet, the telephone, the automobile and almost every other useful thing we use today. Or so they tell me! 🙂
Race being a social construct is more of the politically correct nonsense of believing what one is told to believe rather than believing the evidence of one's eyes. Any rational person who observes an African from the Congo and a European from Denmark knows that they are radically different. In fact, their skin colour is the least important difference between them. The difference between the races in ability to create and maintain a civilisation is also blatantly obvious. Yet, rather than these capabilities being inherent we are told to believe it's because of environment or racism or colonialism or slavery and so on. With regard to the Neanderthals, there is an interesting book written by an Australian named Danny Vendramini called 'Them and Us'. In it he posits a theory that the original migrants from Africa to the Middle East were preyed upon by the Neanderthal and over a 50,000 year period they adapted to become the modern homo sapiens. These modern people then wiped out the Neanderthals, first in the Middle East and eventually in all of Europe. Whether true or not it gives an interesting take on the matter.
indeed, I am scottish from my mother's side living in holland , a cornish man once said that and I quote your cultural identity is in the genes unquote that is just cultural values or gaelic culture please watch the video leftists can't stop crying these people live among you ; quote people are silent about their political beliefs because it has been socially acceptable to bully harass shame intimidate anybody who disagrees with the standard left wing opinion of the day unquote ; this man talking 11 minutes 10 seconds onwards deserves a medal
Race is merely a socio-political term. Race doesnt exist. The term was invented to sugarcoat the biological fact that there are multiple human species today, just as there has always been.
please type in donald trump celtic germanic roots and you will hear the gaelic cultural values , I am scottish from my mother's side living in holland and type in irish , scientific fact : people of celtic descent have a higher percentage of neanderthal dna than other european groups or can have a disease of having too much iron in the blood
Simon you are skating on the edge of a cliff! Take care... I live in Africa and I'm pretty sure most of the locals who exhibit any ability just possibly might have an ancestor from outside their typical group. Heck the Portuguese arrived in Angola and Mozambique and other places 500 odd years ago and judging by some from those parts...well I'm sure you get the drift of my idea!
Get out. I can guarantee that you keep your repellent racism a closely guarded secret. Imagine crawling about with that degree of corrosive contempt coursing through one's sclerotic veins, and no outlet save for Webb's hate page! Tragic.
All races are different with different ideas values & religions. The mistake as we are now finding out in this country is trying to mix them all together, you CANNOT homogenise people, they are not milk!!!!
Not that I've heard. I hear debunkers aplenty, but they are far from being generally accepted. This is most likely for socio-political reasons, however.
@@rogershore3128 They are over that age, and I don't worry. My eldest is fond of fighting. She rescued my youngest's best mate from a bunch of them on a bus once!
I know from my own personal experience that all of Humanity differs wildly in cognitive ability. Outliers at the top end of the Bell Curve exist in all phenotypes. One has only to listen to Thomas Sowell to dispel the notion that Black people are dumber than White people. It's only in the averages where the difference is seen.
And that's the problem, the powers that be hate the fact that some things can just be "known" to "uneducated" peasant types, look at most "experts" the hey are usually autistics types, pseudo intellectuals who rely too much on "evidence" based "facts" and confirmation bias, "facts" are only "commonly agreed opinions" and have little to do with actual universal truths
Even though I am an undergrad researching and studying physicist I know of some people who actually work in the evolutionary biology. And they say modern humans do have Neanderthals and Denisovan DNA due to our sub-Saharan African ancestors intermixing with them as they migrated out. Also you do realize that Denisovans, Neanderthals, and us (modern humans) are basically an off-shoot of Homo Erectus through Homo Heidelbergensis? The genetic diversity amongst modern humans is extremely low while the highest amount is found amongst sub-Saharan Africans. If modern humans were so separate by race explain why we are able to sexually reproduce with each other? Because we are the same species and genus. These are a couple reasons as to why it is ridiculous to say that there are separate races amongst modern humans. For more clarity on where I got this from watch the TH-cam channels of Gutsick Gibbons and Forrest Valkai. And read this "The evolutionary relationships and age of Homo naledi: An assessment using dated Bayesian phylogenetic methods". Journal of Human Evolution.
William Dampier (a man brushed out of history) was quite remarkable for many, many things. He was by no means racist but one thing really stuck in his mind. When he was on the NW coast of Australia he brought some native aboriginals onto his ship. They showed not the slightest interest or curiosity to anything they saw on his ship.
And look how the Australian aborigines have "evolved & developed" since European development. For those that aren't aware, they are given billions of dollars every year - most of which ends up in the "elders" & their family pockets, child rape & domestic violence is normal, even babies have had to be treated for STD's, they were living as stone age people when Europeans first arrived, practiced cannibalism and fought tribe against tribe, rampant alcoholism & drug abuse throughout their communities, oh, and dot painting didn't exist before they were shown how to do it.
David Livingstone said that Africans viewed science with the eyes of an ox. Dr Livingstone also generally looked for the good in the indigenous people.
Aboriginals lived in Australia for 40,000 years and all they came up with were dot, hand print, wavy lines and stick men paintings that a toddler could paint, a bendy stick that comes back to you when you throw it, which they probably found, and a hollowed out trunk that sounds like an elephant farting when you blow down it, which they call music.
You've discovered the secret to speaking the truth (and getting away with it) on TH-cam. Clear, intelligent, properly spoken monologue makes it completely unintelligible to their censors. They have no idea what you're talking about! Bravo!
We all know that Polar bears and Grizzly bears are different subspecies but they can interbreed, of course we all look at west Africans and Japanese people and thinks yep absolutely identical nooooo differences whatsoever either physically, temperament wise or IQ, Japan is like some futuristic virtually crime free anime cartoon and west Africa is like the medieval period just with old motorbikes, guns and badly wired electricity
The issue is also blurred by counting all DNA, of which we share 60% with bananas and marigolds. The proportions of different humanoid genes are greater if we just count those.
Agreed, and we share something like 99% with chimpanzees. But that shouldn't obscure the fact that small differences count - there are two species of prairie voles that are separated by a single gene (for oxytocin) that changes their pair-bonding behaviour, and yet biologists accept that they're separate species.
We are supposed to examine ourselves and our pasts so we may help to chart a more informed course into the future. Genetic differences are offensive to the left-liberal because they represent the inalienable differences among the peoples of the world that cannot be explained away as behavioral modification through culture and learning...they are just simply genetic, and genetics tend to assert themselves in various traits unique to a group.
@@williamvance3271 Seems this might be the wrong channel for you. There is likely one with more purple haired boys pretending to be girls down the playlist.
Europeans have a lot of neanderthal dna. Neanderthals have been found to be very social and collaborative. Makes sense we're different from a group with zero neanderthal dna. Though that dna presence alone can't explain the difference.
Very little information on this subject is available on the internet and I have never heard this subject discussed before. But it answers a lot of questions not just of things like IQ levels and technical achievements of Europeans but vocal and musical along with athletic ability which must have being present in Homo Erectus.
Recently fossilised remains were found in norther Spain that are believed to be 1.4 million years old. As old as remains found in Africa. It may be that species were moving in and out of Africa. The out of Africa theory may be far more complicated that believed.
I don’t believe for a minute we’re all out of Africa. And I think my Scottish Da had a good percentage neanderthal DNA he had all the characteristics including the prominent forehead & he was extremely hairy like an ape it was uncanny.
I broached this subject with someone 14 years ago and they went absolute 'apes h it' - would hear none of and said I was race ist. These are the type of people who will continue to defend against floods with chicken wire fencing they are thats stubborn
What about environmental pressures requiring civilization to develop in Europe and not so much in Africa? When territory, resources and prey animals are abundant, why bother farming?
Yea termites built the Mali empire, built the Cushite empire, built the Benin; one of the UNESCO world heritage, built the Sudan pyramids, built the Songhai empire, built the Ethiopian rock church carved out of rocks, built the Benin empire, built the Asante empire. It used to be way easier to lie and cover up but nowadays, information is everywhere. You cannot blatantly deny all the artworks and stolen sophisticated artifacts found all over your museums.
Excellent video. You may not be aware that another sacred cow has been up-ended. An archaeologist has just written a paper claiming that rather than Africa mankind originated in Eastern Europe. This came about with the discovery of human remains in Europe so old that they pre-date any others elsewhere.
If the Japanese were transported to Somalia they would turn it into Japan. If the Somalis were transported to Japan they would make it Somalia. Transport Sub-Saharan Africans to the UK they will transform it into Africa. Transport Muslims to the UK, they will make it an Islamic country. UK politicans have not figured this out yet.
Yeah, but not true of Nigeria. It’s just dumb to throw all the billion “black Africans” on a continent into one box.
There is much that you have yet to 'figure out', Junior.
@@SashaLea-g5j such as?
@@jonathanjonathan7386 Me thinks that old wise Sasha Lea considers himself the font of all wisdom it must be hard being perfect and lonely at the top.
Yes they have its what they were told to do
As a child in the 60's I thought how fantastic it was the Peace Corps taught desperate people how to dig wells for water. When those wells ran out I wondered why they didn't use the knowledge and dig new ones for themselves, I heard a thousand excuses, then I grew up and no longer wonder.
We still pay for water that actually come out of taps (😮) as shown in begging adverts since the 50s. However, the recipients break the taps and allow the water to gash out. May be they should lustened how to turn them on and off !
Digging those wells only caused the population to increase then causing another famine when the wells ran dry.
Years ago in a dutch game show a dutch family was placed in an african community. People there had to walk several hours each day to fetch water after the only tap in their village stopped working. The dutch guy took one look at it and fixed it in 5 minutes
@@Ed19601 An obvious and sadly consistent pattern! 👍
They had roads and even a railroad in the Congo when the French were there... now there's dirt and rocks. They learned nothing in 1000 years but it's everyone elses fault, not theirs.
At this point, I know I'm being lied to about my people, my heritage, my history. Me and anyone who looks like me. Thank you, sir. For daring to speak truth. I will not have my ancestors dragged through the dirt because they achieved. And because the ancestors of others couldn't.
@patrick, 👏👏👏
Who gives a shit what your ancestors did. What have you done?
Your Ancestors are ignorant, evil hate filled deluded humans like you. Neanderthals are in your genome because you a caveman savage. Most scientist would Debunk this buck tooth racist liar filling up your swine bred rock head with lies. Ask the POS for evidence to his claims!!! DumbA$$ RACE IS NOT BIOLOGICAL.👈💩🤡👹
Absolutely. Proud Teutonic/Scandinavian here!
Proud scandavian/teutonic/with a Greek (Athenian) maternal grandmother here.
Robert SEPEHR said the same thing about this we are descendants from different hominids
I believe that to be very true
Ho boy!
No hybrids is more correct
It's a bit more complex...modern humans are mongrols from various merged similar hominds...Some of us have more of one type of homind than another.
Yes, there are differences but the difference btwn intelligent black & white people are less than the differences btwn an intelligent black n a black moron and there is adifftence btwn a intelligent white man n a white moron. ...Who u want as your neighbour? Nelson Mandela or a white scaghead thug?
Finally after centuries , science has caught up to the common sense observations of the average person.
Only to be held back by ideology... and its not an ancient religoius one
The average dying racist.
@gerryatrix74 The Irony being that the Christian Conservative doesn't see this information as controversial. We are still humans after all.
To the liberal however.
It never lost sight of the truth; it's just that powerful forces of dogma obfuscate it.
If science means "things released after 2000 in newspaper opinion pieces"
I'm in the US where the black community claims that black people built this country.... I'm like cool, when are you ever going to build Africa?
Well they ARE in the process of RE "building" Baltimore and Chicago...(they're currently in the demolition phase of the process!).
What about Wakanda?@@Hiterally_Litler
Nigeria is actually doing pretty well, sometimes called the next China in terms of economic growth
@@phillipholland6795 Working from a low base and with huge deposits of oil and a very large population to utilise.
@@simonwoods8809 Yes, just as the so called Muricans were working with a land mass inhabited by millions of people and plenty of natural resources and also imported a very large population to freeload off of which they ironically wish to complain about today for being "lazy" and "chaotic".
They are not us; we are not them; separation is the answer.
Aaaand.....that is why we have the Sahara.
I don't necessarily disagree, and there are certainly different races, but to claim that we are different species is factually wrong. groups of animals are usually called the same species if they have viable outcome regardless of the gender of each party. clearly, whites can have children with blacks, so we are the same species.
@@Galdring We should stop playing games with these labels and simply use "breed". Humanity has multiple breeds, and they can inter-breed, but a pitbull is not acceptable in the golden-retriever dog-park. A border collie is FAR smarter than a bulldog. Etc. etc.
@@c3bhm - good idea. I'll use "Breed" from now.
However! - it is stupid to not understand that the Individual-Differences ― are More Important than the Average Differences. And I have the solution.
The infernal cheek to even compare the civilization of Pericles to the jungles of Africa. It is more than insulting, it's downright criminal.
How very brave you are to open this discussion on U tube I can almost hear the howls of outrage
please type in donald trump celtic germanic roots and you will hear the gaelic cultural values , I am scottish from my mother's side living in holland
I mostly see insecure white people getting jazzed up.
@@youtubefans510You keep copy-pasting this. What on Earth do you mean? Linguistic roots of the two words? Uhh... sure?
@@AnadonAyleid 90% sure he means this /watch?v=eWOPUDN-Tfo
@@AnadonAyleid watch the specific youtube video for information , you should learn to read hear is not read
Gee, another one of those things I thought EVERYONE knew already. It is so painfully obvious.
Not to everyone.
They will always tell you about the book burnings, but never mention what kind of books they burned.…
Is this just a bot that posts a generic right-wing message to these videos?
@@pbrninja19 Perhaps, but at least these are important and true messages.
@@pbrninja19 Are you just Marxist filth hell bent on poisoning the internet?
The dews will always tell you what has happened to them but never why.
Exiled from 111 countries tells its own story.
When at Uni in the 60,s in central London there were large numbers of Africans in the class. One of the lecturers confided to me " I dont know what we are going to do with these fellows" { the Africans}, as they could ot pass the exams.
The modern west Africans who do do well are the top of the range in their ancestral countries. We've drained the brains from Africa, too.
I think the unfortunate answer was to punt and bring more of them in. The powers that be have decided that throwing human waves of White women at them will eventually breed the Homo Erectus out of them.
Many years ago my father taught maths and mechanical engineering at Borden Army school which took in army students from across the Commonwealth. He was told that when it came to exams he was never to fail those from sub-Saharan Africa.
@@joeblogs4701 happens now too I bet, but it's a quick thought, and they do know
@@SonyaPorter-n9q Not only don't fail them if you have a teenaged daughter you're supposed to not mind if the dindos defile her. Building that new race of Eurasian-Negroids just smart enough to do manual labor.
What Science has suspected all along and is now known. There are distinct differences between the Human sub groups and not purely skin colour and hair structure. Indeed, in hindsight the idea that the only differences should be these minor ones is quite ridiculous. The very fact that sub-Saharan Africans did not evolve intellectually beyond the 'Stone Age Level' was not pure coincidence. It was genetically predetermined.
or was it that until the rest of the world had chenged, they really did not need to? no driving force for evolution to hurry?
If we classified humans as we do other animals, we would break the human genus into several, if not more, species.
Yet our political elite seem to think it a good idea to bring millions of them into our country, regressing our society and coercing our own youth to fall in with their substandard outlook on decent living, they refuse to acknowledge our laws and rules, that is why all African countries are shitholes policed by the armies.
Have you ever seen the skulls from the 1930s, of the three distinct "races" of humans?
The classification as sub-species were Caucasoid, Mongoloid, and Negroid. We can still identify each race by their skull shape and brain case volume. Negroid is 20% less than Caucasoid and 25% less than Mongoloid. These sub-species are now known as Caucasian, Asian and Sub-Saharan African. (Negro).. Now "science" says, we are all the same. My experience with black Americans says NO we are not the same species.
@@malicant123 exactly.
So as the Europeans & Asians were evolving , Those others were devolving. Sounds right to me.
early erectus dna could defeat malaria and sleeping sickness but it gave you a 70 IQ
They where humping monkeys
Not exactly, sub Saharans still have many hypersapiens anatomical features compared with other population like extremely prominent foreheads. So in a sense they evolved further in being homo sapiens than everyone else
Good joke @@vaevictis2789
@@vaevictis2789 yeah, north of the equator are more of mongrels than africa, we're homo-sapien + others (neanderthal an the like). There's even an east/west split of ancestral mixing with regional species as there were different hominids in europe and asia to interbreed with. So first guy is half right as different hominids evolved and adapted in the northern hemisphere that we engaged in gene mixing with an those offspring with better genetic combinations/adaptations survived, though he is wrong about devolution thing.
The main instance of devolution i know about is when scientists sequenced a chickens dna; they found suppressed genes for teeth and tails (which became suppressed after the fall of dinosaurs) and they forced those genes to express in the chicken which grew teeth and a tail. Humans do this too in instances of a person being VERY hairy since birth, though to call that devolution is a stretch as things like this happen in case a species enters into an environment where those 'lost traits' are needed again. These old traits will add to any new traits that've come about in the 10,000s + years since they were suppressed
Surprised this video is still up here!
It is because it's true.
Cherish it!
@@timhallas4275That would be a prime reason to get it Banned 😜
Well something should be rectified especially the point when I almost sapiens arrive to East or West but well doesn't matter
Really surprising. Starmers stazi may come knocking.
It's always been strange to me that people can easily accept that different breeds of animals, dogs for example, can have very different characteristics other than obvious physical differences. Yet when it comes to humans this whole idea goes out the window.
To me at least it would be strange if different races of humans didn't have differing behavioural characteristics.
🎯
@@sawneyhasbeansame thought bless you
And dogs came an extinct grey wolf species in siberia 30kya roughly
Humans are far older and more variety
It's like believing that, if you place a greyhound among poodles, it will increase its intelligence; and, if you place a poodle among greyhounds, it will make it run faster.
@@planefrog it's all in the "pedigree" 🤫🤫🤫🤫
Shows you the differences between different groups of people is vastly more than merely skin colour
Anyone with any acceptable level of intelligence and logic knows this already, the evidence is obvious and overwhelming. This explains a lot about the woke left in terms of intelligence and logic.
Race is Everything. We are top of the pile. Simple as.
Sounds like eugenics
Koreans are top
@@VexOoo-x7y Kahhhhhhhhhhhn🤯
At the moment we live in a world in which the most desirable genes are passed along the least. Intelligent people not having as many kids, pop decline in the West. It is one of the many many growing issues that is going to make life unbearable in the future.
Is there any evidence that intelligent people have fewer children ?
asian and indians are smart too but they fail in other area
Realized this a while ago, so I had kids. Don't let them push us to extinction.
Agree, the most competent and intellectually superior are choosing not to procreate. Many of my most intelligent and clever friends are alone and not having kids.
On the other hand I see many people with zero skills as parents or as human beings in general having kids by the bucket load.
I'm not even to get into other races.
Watch the first 5 minutes of the movie 'Idiocracy'. It is the best version of this sad truth.
Dogs are a single species, yet noone doubts the differences in temperament, aggression and intelligence between; a border collie, Staffordshire bull terrier or a Pekingese.
Yeah, my Labrador only wants to bring me my slippers and my neighbours XL bully only wants to eat babies faces...
Whites are like border collie.
@@ziggysawdust5407 funnily enough my pitbull wanted to lick babies faces while the jack Russell up the road wanted to eat everyone's ankles 🤔🤔🤔🤔
This is precisely what is going on with all life, humans included. Our dna controls pretty much everything, our temperament and intelligence included.
@@YesYes-xb6he except human are several different species that have been interbreeding so we are all hybrids. We were never just one species
Saying what is entirely obvious to anyone with eyes and ears, and a brain.
Indeed, but won't be said on the BBC or Channel 4, or in the Guardian. You only have to look at the behaviour of some of them to see where they originate from.
That immediately excludes all leftists, many of whom have successfully been processed by the entirely feminized education system, which won't allow us to think badly of others. We'll be made to stand in the corner if we do. (Or is that now also considered horrendous abuse?)
Lol, that is astoundingly misinformed. The NOK culture smelted Iron before any Europeans. Black Africans were carrying out mumification before any euroepans or asians. How gullible can some people be. Black Africans founded Egypt. Before you say ' No it was levantines', visually inspect the Narmer Pallette and notice the difference in appearance or physical difference between the Pharoah and the conquered delta egyptians. This old man is here spewing hate against the genes that gave him life. May he remain cursed.
@@2naija
How gullible can some people be?
You tell us.
Unfortunately the increasing infection of WOKE seems to damage the senses and intelligence leading to delusional ideology.
My education is in human evolution. The concept of erectus not being extinct has been on my mind for the last few months.
😂
Erectus is likely the 'ghost dna' at 2-18% in West Africans.
You can spot the females of the species - covered heads shuffling round charity shops.
@@Commissarharry have you read Richard Fuerl?
@@roringusanda2837 no but I'll take a look, seems interesting
I await the follow-up video where you explain why you were forced to take this video down.... ;-)
Oy vey!
@@lawsonium Yes, I'm glad I saw it before some minion of Hope Not Hate blows the whistle on it.
You beat me to it😂
Yes, Simon is on very thin ice !
@@lcship1905 We all are , well any of us that have any intelligence, integrity, common sense and logic. All traits that are no longer regarded as palatable by the political elites.
I appreciate your channel. I'm from Botswana and I am convinced our people have a genetic flaw. Tough conversation. Good luck.
I'm from England and I'm fairly convinced ours do as well.
Unmelaninated hands wrote this.
@ikengaspirit3063 trust me. I'm all melanin.
Lol, that is astoundingly misinformed. The NOK culture smelted Iron before any Europeans. Black Africans were carrying out mumification before any euroepans or asians. How gullible can some people be. Black Africans founded Egypt. Before you say ' No it was levantines', visually inspect the Narmer Pallette and notice the difference in appearance or physical difference between the Pharoah and the conquered delta egyptians. This old man is here spewing hate against the genes that gave him life. May he remain cursed.
I don’t think it’s that serious. You guys are just going through a tough time.
Without European influence Africa would remained as it was.
.
And maybe it was better, for the whole world, if africa remained as it was
More's the pity !
When Stanley reached interior regions of sub Saharan Africa he encountered tribes who had not yet started wearing clothing.
@@MarkMcCullough-y5sOnly trainers !
@@MarkMcCullough-y5s Wakanda?
Be careful Simon. Yes you are most probably right. But being right
will not save you from being cancelled.. And remember it is possible
for a sub Saharan African "male" to become the BBC'S women's
footballer of the year.
And for a Nigerian to be Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. Simon by reference to Nigeria appears to have Kemi Badenoch in mind.
Of course he is right, there are books around still on these studies. I recall some research by a Chinese guy, talking about the skull and face shape, monolid eyes etc.
@@gwenlillianlondon3772 This is standard forensic science. Recently in New Zealand, a five hundred year old European female skull was discovered. No one has denied its racial and gender classification. In stem science that is forensics, in social science that is racist and sexist.
Experimental inquire: what happens when you turn the most advanced human civilization over to the least evolved population?
You create USA chaos.
Baltimore, Chicago, Detroit, Compton, st louis
What happens when u comment without knowledge of immigration demographics.
@@ikengaspirit3063 demographic shift.
Zimbabwe, South Africa today
There was a theory, that is not very popular anymore, that there were 5 or 6 species of human beings. That always made sense to to me!
which ones
Homo erectus, homo sapiens, homo neandrethals, denosovians and two more I can't think of. 1 is a pygmy species found in Malaysia recently
Some aren't even fully human in my estimation.
@@Riosgirl98 LMAO
@@GoldenGod69Homo Floriensis. Nicknamed The hobbit.
Regarding racial differences, does anyone expect sub-Saharan Africa to ever become a world leader in science and technology?
They already are. See adverts.
They have a space program...very successful apparently
Wakanda
How could anything ever top the "mud" hut? They've peaked.
We wuz programmaz, Bruv!
One of your best yet Simon
An intersting topic for the next edition of Black History Month.
Indeed!
Can this be an explanation as to why David Lammy is such an idiot.
99.9% of it. The other 1% is the European dna he has as a Carribbean Windrush type, that 1% allows him to at least button his shirt and and put on his tie, but other than that he's a nematoid
From what I've heard Kier Starmer gets a homoerectus when he's in Lord Allis flat.🤔
Yes
@@ddoherty5956 LOL
Genetic throwbacks occur from time to time.
I'm thankful you said this out loud, or almost loud.
I'm thankful that anyone is talking about it at all.
As an Electronics Engineer all my life, working with many other people sharing the same level on Knowlege in different situations, I have NEVER known anyone other than a European to do my type of work. Throughout School, College etc. None other than Europeans studied this, WHY?
Indians? Asians??
My mate is a highly skilled engineer. He's worked all over Europe. All his colleagues doing the same job, are also English and other Europeans.
You haven’t traveled much have you 😂
I was taught alot of my electronics knowledge by a black man.
Me too
Electronics and aviation
And those blacks who did usually dropped out or were bottom of class grade wise
Women too
This explains most things that we observe in the behaviour of different groups in multicultural UK
It all goes to show, you don't actually know someone until you've been forced to live with them.
@@theenglishman8668does this now explain the traditional segregation and attitudes in the USA for the last 250 years? Is the rest of the world now ready to get it?
@@lookoutforchrisEurope had those same attitudes
Even lucy letby 'might I suggest ?
@@HaleyChain-vw8rr How did Lucy Letby get dragged into the conversation? Try staying on topic.
They are a subspecies of the human race, we evolved
Less evolved, plain and simple, and they act it.
That is a rather simpleton view about it. You need to consider how Europeans and most Asians lived. They either lived in tundras, deserts, extreme weather, whether it’s storms or droughts. If you live in tropical and near tropical temperate climates, you have a much easier time. That’s why we all like to visit tropical islands or equatorial countries because it’s a calm and relaxing place. Sometimes you get some brutal weather in the form of hurricanes and monsoons.But you have to be inventive if you live in these harsher environments, or you will die of starvation, dehydration, famine, or exposure. You have to learn how to plan in advance to grow crops in the summer and to store things for the winter or you and your children will die. And it’s not like every European or Asian was smart enough to figure this out on their own, it’s usually the few very smart, inventive people that really figured this out and spread the knowledge. These differences and how to live thousands of years ago let a giant divergences that you see today. I can take somebody from Kenya and easily teach them how to be an engineer and you could take a person from Norway, who doesn’t do anything much at all, but live off the benefits of western culture and society. This is not to say that all humans are genetically the same, and that all cultures are equal, but the science is constantly evolving on these topics and I think it’s pretty presumptuous of you to think that people who live in other places are less capable.
@@googull4778thank you, even if we are genetically varying and not all the same doesn’t mean that one party isn’t able to exceed the other and vice versa. Variability in species is always present, there’s stupid and intelligent people, no matter the race. Instead of fixating on race and the division it causes in our society we should rather be concentrating on the idiots that run the world, many of which neither possess intelligence, emotional nor logical alike and only care for themselves and their greed. To reduce all of these bad traits to a genetic cause would stunt such incentive in removing the actual problems out of the governments, it’s not about race or gender, it’s about the individual themself and we need to do better but as long as people are unhappy about their own lives they won’t be able to properly look past the edge of their own plate.
People are forced to only think about survival instead of actually living, when was there actual good news on TV or radio? Or on social media in general? It’s meant to make you unhappy and distracted, because that’s how they (media in general) make money. work work work, consume this, consume that, until you can retire and die of health complications that stem from the processed, unreal food we’re fed while a Bill Gates or Jeff Bezos definitely dont eat a Beyond Meat burger in their spare time. Inflation which made everything 5x more expensive while salaries haven’t really increased. Misinformation in media about health in general, the DEA and its corruption, the US healthcare system in general. And the rich are profiting off of it. Causation and Correlation are important, it’s not the black guy sitting in the parking lot that’s making everyone’s life miserable, he’s also just suffering under the 7 deadly sins many tyrants are still committing for profit.
They smell it too.
Unfortunately with insulting and demeaning statements expressed impolitely you justify the racial activists.
That's not how evolution works
It’s worth pointing out that the humans that came out of Africa somewhere around 70,000 years ago were not anatomically modern sub Saharan Africans.
As modern sub Saharan Africans are a result of interbreeding with this relic hominid “ghost species”.
If we all descended from sub Saharan Africans, then all people on earth would have genes from this “ghost species”, which we don’t, and would also have relatively recent sub Saharan African genetics, which we don’t.
The group of humans formerly known as “Cro magnon”, which are now known as “western hunter gatherers” were living in Western Europe up to 35,000 years ago and were almost genetically identical with modern Western European populations.
Which is why the whole cheddar man debacle is really amusing.
Because he was a western hunter gatherer and his remains date to somewhere around 10,000 years ago and despite being almost genetically identical to modern Europeans, they want you to believe that he and his western hunter gatherer counterparts were “black”.
So not only are they trying to mislead people into thinking that western hunter gatherers were sub Saharan Africans, they also want you to believe that black people magically transformed into white Europeans in the space of just 10,000 years.
Which is hilarious.
It’s also worth pointing out that western hunter gatherers all had blue eyes.
It’s strange, because they try and say that the genetics for blue eyes originated in the Black Sea region somewhere around 8,000 years ago.
But yet all western hunter gatherers had blue eyes and they were living in Western Europe 35,000 years ago.
I really don’t see any mechanism by which sub Saharan Africans migrate into Europe 70,000 years ago and by 35,000 years ago there’s already a population of blue eyed, almost genetically identical Western European people living there, with no recent sub Saharan genetic ancestry in their genome.
The reality is, all the different groups of people on earth are varying degrees of ancient and modern hominids that interbred with each other.
But the way the “out of Africa” theory is always portrayed in the mainstream is that sub Saharan Africans migrated out of Africa and in 70,000 years they magically transformed into all the other people on earth.
Thus presenting this narrative that we’re all descended from sub Saharan Africans.
But it’s just not true.
In fact, I would say that it’s one of the greatest lies that we have been sold in the last century and there is certainly an ulterior motive behind trying to make people believe it.
@@scaberouswretch3673 🎯 excellently put!!
🧿🔱🔥🔱
right...Its a Lie .
Inbreeding over the millennia probably had some influences too concerning dominance of local eye and hair colours and other 'inner and outer features'
(Genotype & Phenotype)
Very well thought out! Also worth thinking about convergence DNA evolution, where similar or sometimes identical portions of DNA independently evolve with no direct link in lineage.
This video will do very badly with the algorithm because the tribe doesn’t want their propaganda to become ineffective when it comes to coercing European women into choosing a specific type of non-European man…
🎯
He has twisted this study to promote his racial ideology, rather than present the nuance that is implicit in evolutionary history. The "super-archic" (I'm pretty sure Robert sephr made this term) species was around at the same time as the species which left Africa to become later Neanderthals. He's purposely misconstruing the science, implying that Africans only come directly from this super archaic species, thus suggesting that they're not related to the rest of humanity. He is literally dehumanising Africans. This is not the science. Homo-sapiens evolved in Africa and mixed with some species and the homo-sapiens that left Africa outcompeted the Neanderthals. Homo-sapiens push the Neanderthals to extinction at the edge of Europe. Where is this nuance? Where is this passion from Simon? Nah he'd rather put down a race of people than promote actual science
The low-hanging fruit.
@@r1234233 1) There is no one study - it is ALL studies in genetics that confirm this.
2) LOL Robert Sepher did not invent the term 'super-archaic' - it is the standard term used by all geneticists to describe DNA that Homo Sapiens inherited from an unknown hominid that existed very far back in time.
3) It is you who appears to have misconstrued the science. If the OOA theory is true (many geneticists now doubt the validity of it however), then sub-saharan Africans mated with this unknown hominid species sometime within the last 70,000 years, as this DNA is not present in any other population. So this mixing occurred after the first homo sapiens left Africa (again, this is only assuming that OOA is the correct theory).
Even if OOA if not actually correct, we still know for a fact that sub-Saharan Africans mated with this species in the fairly recent past, as the amounts of the 'ghost' DNA is very high (~20%), compared with Denisovan (~10%) or Neanderthal DNA (~6%) in other populations.
@@r1234233 Where did you find this "copy and paste" drivel from ?
Thank you for saying out loud what most of us know in our hearts to be true, and at the same time i celebrate all the wonderful diversity of our species and wish to preserve and enhance all cultures, in their own lands!
Cheddar man was not black
@@GreggFellowsHe invented a famous cheese. 😊
@@GreggFellows Because the scientists doing the research said so. It was the decision of a left wing activist TV producer who chose the skin colour.
@@GreggFellows
Because the BBC said he was. 🎯
If he was black he would have had bowed legs due to vitamin d deficiency
@@GreggFellows He made some fine cheese though.
I have no problem accepting that homo sapien might have sub variants and dont think there is any moral negatives to exploring that. It doesn't really change the moral imperative of treating everyone as equal, which we do NOT do anymore. Certain demographics seem to always have the moral high ground no matter what they destroy. This is wrong and cant continue if we want to live in a just world.
Individuals should be judged individually, but collectives should now be judged as collectives, and if we do this we will see that certain collectives are 'civilizational invalids', bringing destruction wherever they go as a collective. But we are currently trapped in a cult of Cultural Marxism that refuses to allow us to talk honestly about reality, and in the meantime society gets destroyed (to the benefit of a certain other group that we're never allowed to talk about).
Treating everyone equally does not mean providing equal outcomes however, does it. This rational approach means that one subspecies will prevail. What's that called?... Oh, yes... evolution.
I think the new common logic once this is widely accepted will be : "Stereotypes exist for a reason, but individuality is a common human trait."
The tidal wave of science can only be held back for so long.
Facts don't cease to be facts, just because they are ignored.
@@Occident."Facts" are only "commonly agreed opinions" and can change with the seasons and political climate.....they usually have less to do with universal truth and more to do with narrative control
Despite the BBC, Scientific American and Wikipedia, etc Mrxist's best efforts
@@Occident. "Facts" are only "commonly agreed opinions" anyway and change with the funding, they can't be relied on if your looking for absolute truths....
indeed
Slowly science is proving what is plainly observable.
Only slowly because science has become politicised
I still don't understand why the Elites want us to mate with Homo Erectus....at least based on advertisements and modern media.
Maybe they want a dumb slave class.
He has twisted this study to promote his racial ideology, rather than present the nuance that is implicit in evolutionary history. The "super-archic" (I'm pretty sure Robert sephr made this term) species was around at the same time as the species which left Africa to become later Neanderthals. He's purposely misconstruing the science, implying that Africans only come directly from this super archaic species, thus suggesting that they're not related to the rest of humanity. He is literally dehumanising Africans. This is not the science. Homo-sapiens evolved in Africa and mixed with some species and the homo-sapiens that left Africa outcompeted the Neanderthals. Homo-sapiens push the Neanderthals to extinction at the edge of Europe. Where is this nuance? Where is this passion from Simon? Nah he'd rather put down a race of people that promote actual science
@@r1234233thank you for this information
@@r1234233 He clearly stated that they contain up to 19% of this archaic hominid DNA. You're the one miscontuing what was stated.
I've been called a racist time and again for describing the black man as a subspecies and here's science proving me right 😂😂
“I feel genetically inferior and insecure around black men.”
I was never 'racist' (racist realist) until I encountered multiculturalism.
Multiculturalism isn't a harmonious single society. It's different societies geographically placed together.
true, please type in donald trump celtic germanic roots and you will hear the gaelic cultural values , I am scottish from my mother's side living in holland
@@youtubefans510 Vrolijk Kerstfeest
Seems there are a lot of small brains invading our shores🎉
Big willies taking all your women
@illegalsmirf have you seen our women 🤣🤣🤣 more than welcome... If only they stuck to over 12s tho hey? 👋
a shame the HIV goes up . . ..
.... and even smaller ones running the country.
And invading your women and girls too. By the looks of things, your women and girls enjoy very much being invaded by them.
Explains Diane Abbott and David Lammey.
please type in donald trump celtic germanic roots and you will hear the gaelic cultural values , I am scottish from my mother's side living in holland
Is there a gene for cycling fast down busy pavements ?
Ha ha ha 😅😅😅 good point !! I see em all the time whilst driving my lorry and they scare me !!! If anything awful happened , twould always be MY fault ! These people have a flippin death wish 😮
Kuntz Syndrome
@@JaneRoss-ff3wp people??
You're right. A greeting from Denmark
But I am being told that we all descend from Africa and that there were no other species anywhere in the world ?
Of course I am 63 and so I was taught different from history books and tv programmes back in the day and I still believe that which I was taught years ago because it makes more sense to me than today's line that we all come from Africa .
All of our creation stores tell the same story.
Darwinian theory. Do you not believe that tortoises and turtles all came from a single source? That explains why land animals in Australia, and other isolated land masses, are unique. But humans migrated there from another source.
lindaa, I expect you mean no other *human* species anywhere in the world. But why would there be? A species must start somewhere, and so there will most likely be only one source.
BELIEVE ONLY YOUR OWN JUDGMENT , an hypothesis means they have no prove , in 1400 people convincingly thought the earth was flat
They say evolution magically ceased to affect us the minute homo sapiens split, ignoring that factors like the climate (planning over the winter to survive it vs not having to care about that in tropical regions for example).
I lived in the ghetto for 10 years in a major US city. Something is certainly different between blacks and Whites. Impulse control could be the major difference.
I don't believe the, 'Out of Africa' theory.
Me neither
Icreasingly it looks suspect
It has been challenged following new discoveries in north eastern Europe.
The info has been removed from yt, but the research was conducted by a German anthropologist.
@@LenaK-i8rnever heard of it - I’d love to learn abt it
Never heard of it - sounds interesting
Thank you for this valuable information which is probably suppressed.
It's evolutionary rubbish, even Darwin said it's Theory, we are the result of intelligent design ☦️
Simon, interesting but I believe your analysis might have overlooked the case concerning the present Foreign Secretary, Lammy, who seems to have acquired the knowledge from some secret source that it is possible for a male to grow a cervix together with a few other spurious perceptions including numeration. Is it possible there is another sub gene pool with these rare and exceptional abilities?
Lammy is certainly sub something
Maybe so, but strange and missing genes of different regions don't compare with the moron gene and far too many promoted beyond their abilities seem to carry those genes... 😂
not forgetting his sibling Dianne the A level mathematical Genius who wears odd shoes?
We must all bow to his Lived Experience.
Science is W. Supremacy, remember.
So what genetic combination are the Starmer trio, according to you?
Inconvenient truth. I find myself wondering if this topic will soon be on Starmer's list of things that you can be locked up for mentioning.
Our names are being noted as we write!
@ I daresay my name has been on their list since 2020 due to my comments on the so called pandemic.
@@ericrawson2909 Ooh - an Edgelord.
@@SashaLea-g5j That's a new word for me. No, not an edgelord, just someone trying to awaken people out of following the unscientific, insane, harmful official narrative that trampled on our human rights and did way more harm than good.
My name is on multiple lists, something to be proud of.
Animals with fewer genetic, phenotypic, and behavioral differences are classified as different species.
the left do not want to hear that , it makes them feel eeire they will be thinking of moustache man from austria
Ok name one then
@@phillipholland6795 Red squirrels and grey squirrels are the easy go-to.
Not gonna hear this on the BBC 😂😂😂
Because it's made up BS?
@@albanan1 Cry harder
@@albanan1No, actually the majority of what the BBC broadcasts is made up B.S.
@@albanan1like you then 🤷🏻♂️
@@Lbm414.Oleg.Kuznetsov. from a man called Leighton, written in Cyrillic? And you say that I'm made up? Lol.
DEI is how the world ends
Oy vey.
DEI + MRNA
Apparently the Walmart group are going to drop it fingers crossed the dominoes will begin to fall...🤔
DEI + Islam
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang but a DEI.
I remember browsing through the reference library of my town in the mid 1970's and coming across this book, which I don't even remember it's title. The essence or substance of it's content was to compare photo's of the different face's of African peoples to photos of different species of apes and monkeys!
I will wager that book has been taken off the shelf since that time!
Almost indistinguishable, huh?
I do hope so.
Just look at the aboriginals in Australia!
*photos
*faces
I recall that was one of Desmond Morris's books, probably The Naked Ape.
This explains to me as a 62 Yr old the reason that before the open door policies now adopted as a monoculture the UK achieved the near impossible so many times
After a century or two of inter-breeding the English will have difficulty peeling a banana
Notice when one thinks it's a White woman in a TV advert, it's mixed !
It's been known for decades that there are real physical differences between races of humans, it has not been politically correct to say so. Anyone spotted any Greenlanders winning running races, or white men the 100m ?
Or Africans inventing F1, cars in general, bridge technology, the arts, classical music, well pretty much anything above a mud hut and basic hunting tools, but they can run fast, a handy trick with only a spear as defence
Even within the black race there are different efficiencies: Blacks from American continent (originated from W. Africa and the Gulf of Guinea) are good in short distance fast racing, while blacks from Ethiopia and Kenya are good in long distance racing!
I think there was that one cameraman who maintained his pace in front of the frontrunner.
Yes, one has to out run a lion so the ancestors of sub Saharan Africans gene pool invested in physical stamina vs. intellect.
@@jimanast3593 Not much cop at swimming though.
We Europeans have Nederlanthal Genes they where highly Intelligent
And they could spell Neanderthal.
Yes, they was highly intellijent witch accounts for our own hi Intelijence.
But were outcompeted by more prolific and group-oriented hominids. A warning for us, perhaps?
@@peterlangbridge4628And they could spell which and high as well. Oh and by the way intelligence.
Looks like the Neanderthals were probably better educated than you were too. I'm sure they were better at spelling and grammar than you are even though writing had yet to be invented. Compared to you they must have been very clever indeed!
Some are good at basketball, others going to the moon.
Going to the moon is much more useful.
@@lesleycronin832😂😂
@lesleycronin832 Actually being good at athletics is more useful than going to the moon. Going to the moon is the most useless endeavor in human history
@@thecrow4597try again but this time use your brain to understand what the statement was actually about.
😄😄👍
There are differences between human beings for sure. Differences in IQ, physique etc. What's rather disturbing is how some people find joy in looking down on others because of these differences. No one chose to be born a certain race. So let people be. We'll all die anyway so smart thing to do is enjoy life and do good in the best way you can.
How about realizing that the typical and repeated behaviors of some is why they are looked down upon?
I am 65 yo, and as a youngster in the '70's I accepted the general view that everyone was as capable as anybody else but that colonialism kept certain populations from evolving... Then acquiring a critical mind through scientific training made me ponder about the discrepancies, but obviously I must have been a racist...😐
@@ianxyoutube the whole of known history sets examples of better thinking, greater controlled aggression, inventiveness, adaptation to harsh climates, genuine seafaring. Common writing and counting systems.
Philosophy, invention, genuine science, engineering, farming, animal husbandry and more...
Just how much of any of that originated in Sub saharan Africa or Australia and several other places that eventually and clearly benefitted from thousands of years of emire building and colonial contact?
People who wish to be back to the stone ages
Oh yes that be Islam 😅
This should be taught in every school world wide
@@deavman definatly "racist" common sense and critical thinking thinking skills are forms of colonial oppression didn't u know ......bigot 🙄😉😅😅😅😅😅
Are you better than the Africans / From the Christian point of view you are not!
Wouldn’t it be grand if ideology wasn’t driving science, so that these differences which are obvious to anyone who’s lived long and been everywhere, or who simply possesses a skeptical rationalism, could be openly admitted and our societies could act accordingly?
This certainly helps explain the lack of animal domestication of animals in Africans prior to interactions with arabs and Europeans.
A Million Years, Invented a Stick and a Mud Hut.
...and a funky dance.
Twerking.....
Nnaaaa mate! Haven't you heard, that they invented the internet, the telephone, the automobile and almost every other useful thing we use today. Or so they tell me! 🙂
And the "white devil" stole it all 😬😬😬😬
The noble cabbage. 🎯
Race being a social construct is more of the politically correct nonsense of believing what one is told to believe rather than believing the evidence of one's eyes. Any rational person who observes an African from the Congo and a European from Denmark knows that they are radically different. In fact, their skin colour is the least important difference between them. The difference between the races in ability to create and maintain a civilisation is also blatantly obvious. Yet, rather than these capabilities being inherent we are told to believe it's because of environment or racism or colonialism or slavery and so on.
With regard to the Neanderthals, there is an interesting book written by an Australian named Danny Vendramini called 'Them and Us'. In it he posits a theory that the original migrants from Africa to the Middle East were preyed upon by the Neanderthal and over a 50,000 year period they adapted to become the modern homo sapiens. These modern people then wiped out the Neanderthals, first in the Middle East and eventually in all of Europe. Whether true or not it gives an interesting take on the matter.
So true!
indeed, I am scottish from my mother's side living in holland , a cornish man once said that and I quote your cultural identity is in the genes unquote that is just cultural values or gaelic culture please watch the video leftists can't stop crying these people live among you ; quote people are silent about their political beliefs because it has been socially acceptable to bully harass shame intimidate anybody who disagrees with the standard left wing opinion of the day unquote ; this man talking 11 minutes 10 seconds onwards deserves a medal
@@JP-lk2qs So subjective. There, fixed it for you.
Race is merely a socio-political term. Race doesnt exist. The term was invented to sugarcoat the biological fact that there are multiple human species today, just as there has always been.
please type in donald trump celtic germanic roots and you will hear the gaelic cultural values , I am scottish from my mother's side living in holland and type in irish , scientific fact : people of celtic descent have a higher percentage of neanderthal dna than other european groups or can have a disease of having too much iron in the blood
Simon you are skating on the edge of a cliff! Take care...
I live in Africa and I'm pretty sure most of the locals who exhibit any ability just possibly might have an ancestor from outside their typical group. Heck the Portuguese arrived in Angola and Mozambique and other places 500 odd years ago and judging by some from those parts...well I'm sure you get the drift of my idea!
Well the white Europeans captured by the Barbary Pirates were forced to breed with Africans, thus chris rock and thomas sowell exist
Amazing how Africans can see the differences , yet unintelligent British are blind to the obvious.
Get out. I can guarantee that you keep your repellent racism a closely guarded secret. Imagine crawling about with that degree of corrosive contempt coursing through one's sclerotic veins, and no outlet save for Webb's hate page! Tragic.
@@russelsellick316 🤣🤣 I have an entire family of engineers, doctors and lawyers not one of us have any European ancestry so miss me with that BS.
@SashaLea-g5j your fancy grammar and unique words don't change the obvious truth. Liberal.
A pity sub saharan Africa hadn't been left as a big national park.
Daktari.
All races are different with different ideas values & religions. The mistake as we are now finding out in this country is trying to mix them all together, you CANNOT homogenise people, they are not milk!!!!
Don't forget the Denisovans. They just found an new species in asia much older that kinda throws the whole out of Africa theory into question.
Australia got them in the form of the aborigine . .yeah
Hasn't the Out of Africa theory been debunked by leading anthropologists?
Not that I've heard. I hear debunkers aplenty, but they are far from being generally accepted. This is most likely for socio-political reasons, however.
The BBC wants our daughters to breed with certain people. Our daughters are less than enthusiastic!
I wouldn’t worry until they reach 9 years of age.
The small hats
@@Brundle-fly They stick to their own, generally.
@@rogershore3128 They are over that age, and I don't worry. My eldest is fond of fighting. She rescued my youngest's best mate from a bunch of them on a bus once!
Trust me bud, your "daughters" aren't particularly a challenge
We all know from our own experiences that there are major differences
Yes. I studiously avoid white people.
I know from my own personal experience that all of Humanity differs wildly in cognitive ability. Outliers at the top end of the Bell Curve exist in all phenotypes. One has only to listen to Thomas Sowell to dispel the notion that Black people are dumber than White people. It's only in the averages where the difference is seen.
Don’t need to be a scientist to know this.
And that's the problem, the powers that be hate the fact that some things can just be "known" to "uneducated" peasant types, look at most "experts" the hey are usually autistics types, pseudo intellectuals who rely too much on "evidence" based "facts" and confirmation bias, "facts" are only "commonly agreed opinions" and have little to do with actual universal truths
Even though I am an undergrad researching and studying physicist I know of some people who actually work in the evolutionary biology. And they say modern humans do have Neanderthals and Denisovan DNA due to our sub-Saharan African ancestors intermixing with them as they migrated out. Also you do realize that Denisovans, Neanderthals, and us (modern humans) are basically an off-shoot of Homo Erectus through Homo Heidelbergensis? The genetic diversity amongst modern humans is extremely low while the highest amount is found amongst sub-Saharan Africans. If modern humans were so separate by race explain why we are able to sexually reproduce with each other? Because we are the same species and genus. These are a couple reasons as to why it is ridiculous to say that there are separate races amongst modern humans.
For more clarity on where I got this from watch the TH-cam channels of Gutsick Gibbons and Forrest Valkai. And read this "The evolutionary relationships and age of Homo naledi: An assessment using dated Bayesian phylogenetic methods". Journal of Human Evolution.
You can’t train an Afghan Hound to be a guide dog.
William Dampier (a man brushed out of history) was quite remarkable for many, many things. He was by no means racist but one thing really stuck in his mind. When he was on the NW coast of Australia he brought some native aboriginals onto his ship. They showed not the slightest interest or curiosity to anything they saw on his ship.
Same here - if you'd put me on a space ship 🛸
And look how the Australian aborigines have "evolved & developed" since European development. For those that aren't aware, they are given billions of dollars every year - most of which ends up in the "elders" & their family pockets, child rape & domestic violence is normal, even babies have had to be treated for STD's, they were living as stone age people when Europeans first arrived, practiced cannibalism and fought tribe against tribe, rampant alcoholism & drug abuse throughout their communities, oh, and dot painting didn't exist before they were shown how to do it.
Obviously on board his ship no white women to be seen.
David Livingstone said that Africans viewed science with the eyes of an ox. Dr Livingstone also generally looked for the good in the indigenous people.
Aboriginals lived in Australia for 40,000 years and all they came up with were dot, hand print, wavy lines and stick men paintings that a toddler could paint, a bendy stick that comes back to you when you throw it, which they probably found, and a hollowed out trunk that sounds like an elephant farting when you blow down it, which they call music.
The saying" Lighting the Blue touch paper" comes to mind.
I’m definitely sharing this video with many people.
Even better are Robert Sepehr's videos...
You've discovered the secret to speaking the truth (and getting away with it) on TH-cam. Clear, intelligent, properly spoken monologue makes it completely unintelligible to their censors. They have no idea what you're talking about! Bravo!
Excellent work, thank you for researching this topic ❤
If your telling me Dianne Abbott is a different species from me then I believe you 👍
We all know that Polar bears and Grizzly bears are different subspecies but they can interbreed, of course we all look at west Africans and Japanese people and thinks yep absolutely identical nooooo differences whatsoever either physically, temperament wise or IQ, Japan is like some futuristic virtually crime free anime cartoon and west Africa is like the medieval period just with old motorbikes, guns and badly wired electricity
Yet the BBC liberals try to brainwash us that this is not so.
Grizzlies and polar bears are entirely seperate species, not just subspecies.
@CRT4Dummies amazing
The Out of Africa Theory is also being quite challenged these days. For example, remains located in the Misilya Cave.
I’ve always believed that evolution didn’t happen in one isolated place.
The issue is also blurred by counting all DNA, of which we share 60% with bananas and marigolds. The proportions of different humanoid genes are greater if we just count those.
Agreed, and we share something like 99% with chimpanzees. But that shouldn't obscure the fact that small differences count - there are two species of prairie voles that are separated by a single gene (for oxytocin) that changes their pair-bonding behaviour, and yet biologists accept that they're separate species.
thats a very important point 👍
We are supposed to examine ourselves and our pasts so we may help to chart a more informed course into the future. Genetic differences are offensive to the left-liberal because they represent the inalienable differences among the peoples of the world that cannot be explained away as behavioral modification through culture and learning...they are just simply genetic, and genetics tend to assert themselves in various traits unique to a group.
Inalienable?
@@williamvance3271 the parts of ourselves that we neither choose nor can we change.
@@kachmi keep yourself to yourself then.
@@williamvance3271 Seems this might be the wrong channel for you. There is likely one with more purple haired boys pretending to be girls down the playlist.
@@kachmi yer maws a whit?
" A clever and resourceful species" A big pat on the back, then.
Many creative genes, not seen anywhere else.
He wan`t talking about you though Peter...
Startlingly interesting.
Europeans have a lot of neanderthal dna. Neanderthals have been found to be very social and collaborative. Makes sense we're different from a group with zero neanderthal dna. Though that dna presence alone can't explain the difference.
I personally believe the differences can be better explained by greater understanding in the domain of epigenetics
@@mudddgeis that the one that studies zoological propensity for hair trigger violence?
Very little information on this subject is available on the internet and I have never heard this subject discussed before. But it answers a lot of questions not just of things like IQ levels and technical achievements of Europeans but vocal and musical along with athletic ability which must have being present in Homo Erectus.
Forbidden knowledge, certainly not allowed to be mentioned during the Olympics. Even if the differences are completely obvious
Recently fossilised remains were found in norther Spain that are believed to be 1.4 million years old. As old as remains found in Africa. It may be that species were moving in and out of Africa. The out of Africa theory may be far more complicated that believed.
However the *himp-out of Africa theory still remains intact 😂
I don’t believe for a minute we’re all out of Africa. And I think my Scottish Da had a good percentage neanderthal DNA he had all the characteristics including the prominent forehead & he was extremely hairy like an ape it was uncanny.
Super interesting subject Simon - thankyou
I broached this subject with someone 14 years ago and they went absolute 'apes h it' - would hear none of and said I was race ist. These are the type of people who will continue to defend against floods with chicken wire fencing they are thats stubborn
Let us remember, before European colonization, the tallest structures in sub saharan Africa were built by termites.😊
What about environmental pressures requiring civilization to develop in Europe and not so much in Africa? When territory, resources and prey animals are abundant, why bother farming?
Yea termites built the Mali empire, built the Cushite empire, built the Benin; one of the UNESCO world heritage, built the Sudan pyramids, built the Songhai empire, built the Ethiopian rock church carved out of rocks, built the Benin empire, built the Asante empire. It used to be way easier to lie and cover up but nowadays, information is everywhere. You cannot blatantly deny all the artworks and stolen sophisticated artifacts found all over your museums.
Not exactly; there were 10+ story buildings of mud too...
@@templekanu6740artefacts such as scary nondescript masks 😊
@@templekanu6740funnily enough aethiopia was more "European" than "sub Saharan African".......
Excellent video. You may not be aware that another sacred cow has been up-ended.
An archaeologist has just written a paper claiming that rather than Africa mankind originated in Eastern Europe.
This came about with the discovery of human remains in Europe so old that they pre-date any others elsewhere.