Labour manifesto is quietly radical | Election 2024 | The New Statesman

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 491

  • @zedrake
    @zedrake 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    It isn't "quietly radical" but its a start. I voted for Corbyn in 2017 and 2019. We lost. I don't want to keep being the party or voter of "well if everyone voted like me we'd be fine". I liked Keirs response to the protester, "we're done being the party of protest, its time to be the party of power". I'm hoping that 1 term in we DO get more of the 2017 / 19 manifesto back in there but for now its a start

    • @briandelaney9710
      @briandelaney9710 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      No. I just think they are being managerial. I get no vibe that there will anything more radical from this lot. It’s disappointing

    • @Sharpcarbon6
      @Sharpcarbon6 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No change with Labour judging by that manifesto!
      Reform for me it’s the only way things will change! 👍🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

    • @boxtradums0073
      @boxtradums0073 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I have some magic beans to sell you

    • @stevenwilliamson6236
      @stevenwilliamson6236 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It's glib garbage.

    • @RicB1976
      @RicB1976 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      The country is on it's backside, I'm quite happy with quietly radical.

  • @federiconoguera1162
    @federiconoguera1162 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    Quietly Radical has got to be the biggest overstatement for = mild

    • @johnmoorefilm
      @johnmoorefilm 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂👌

    • @ArtyFactual_Intelligence
      @ArtyFactual_Intelligence 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Leave the Noisy Radicalist statements to the fraudulent populists.

    • @stevec6427
      @stevec6427 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      With the state of the country and economy, they'll need to be mild to avoid making things worse and then build it up to something more radical

    • @Clare0116
      @Clare0116 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Meaning they daren't put much in print or mention it in speaking because they won't be keeping election pledges?

    • @RobinHarris-nf4yv
      @RobinHarris-nf4yv 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I suggest you actually read the manifesto

  • @DeanJuvenal
    @DeanJuvenal 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +81

    To the New Statesman, anything other than Vanilla is radical.

    • @Morning404
      @Morning404 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I've really realised how centrist and bad they are.

    • @federiconoguera1162
      @federiconoguera1162 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@Morning404 the audacity of them to do a "left power" list and they're literally the most uncompromised centrists.

    • @Red1Green2Blue3
      @Red1Green2Blue3 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      correction: Anything other than Vanilla for the general public is considered radical

    • @wildfire9280
      @wildfire9280 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Red1Green2Blue3 The problem of relativity is that radical status quos make non-radical positions radical.

    • @RobinHarris-nf4yv
      @RobinHarris-nf4yv 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Jeremy Corbyn losing twice is radical change eh 🤣
      Im sure the greens winning 3 seats will bring radical change

  • @tobyb6379
    @tobyb6379 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +100

    Five mins in and still no analysis. Just talking about nothing. Exactly the sort of journalism we need during an election.

    • @aeris2001
      @aeris2001 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      wat

    • @Ueiksg
      @Ueiksg 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Maybe skip that bit or watch the whole thing if you want analysis. 0 attention span

    • @philippajoy4300
      @philippajoy4300 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Go to A Different Bias. Phil Moorhouse. He's clever.

    • @sfactory8253
      @sfactory8253 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Thanks for that, saved me time

    • @XeNeXX
      @XeNeXX 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      statesmen are just tories so why would they discus the disaster for the tories - when they can just waffle to distract you - where they start - labours tax - because of course - peak tories

  • @MrDavelongly
    @MrDavelongly 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    When will the commentariat realise that the only people who care about tax cuts are those who have a lot of money. Otherwise it's always peanuts

    • @TheEroticDonkey
      @TheEroticDonkey 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You'd be surprised how many poor people are enraged when parties say they will raise taxes for the top 1% of earners

    • @MrDavelongly
      @MrDavelongly 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Let's say benefit from then instead of care about.

    • @alanhat5252
      @alanhat5252 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@TheEroticDonkeytrue but whose propaganda are they repeating? That of the Tory client media.

    • @stevec6427
      @stevec6427 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheEroticDonkey but they might leave the country etc, etc

  • @lewis9159
    @lewis9159 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    "quietly" is an understatement. silently more like, almost like it's not radical at all

  • @localshaman
    @localshaman 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    So quiet you have to hold your ear to the wind to hear it

    • @Morning404
      @Morning404 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's a manifesto approved by the establishment and billionaires.

    • @RobinHarris-nf4yv
      @RobinHarris-nf4yv 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Corbyn brought radical change 🤣🤣

  • @oliverstrahle
    @oliverstrahle 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    "quietly radical" is "making peers retire at 80" ? Can't wait to see the massive changes this will make to the country.

  • @drkseidis8055
    @drkseidis8055 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    New Statesman have been a disgrace as it pertains to not so quiet support for Labour, I'm sure many others in here will agree

  • @ericajohnson3504
    @ericajohnson3504 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have never earned that much, under £15k a year, but would happily pay more tax if it would fix the NHS, and I am sure I'm not the only one.

    • @alanhat5252
      @alanhat5252 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So vote Green, they're the ones with plans for real-world improvements & if you _do_ happen to end up with income over £10million you'll pay a whopping _one percent_ more tax! (2% over £100million).

    • @Clare0116
      @Clare0116 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Pouring more money down a drain won't make the badly-run privatised NHS any better! The Managers and diversity policies all need sacking with nurses running wards like they used to, under a senior nurse matron!

  • @goonerboz6023
    @goonerboz6023 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    Its hell for the poor and disabled there keeping every cruel tory policy universal credit and 2 child cap another tory policy and there even going to go along with the torys on disability benefit cuts liz kendall did say it needs to be cut

    • @californiadreamin8423
      @californiadreamin8423 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      The 2 child cap was a Corbyn policy.

    • @hustlinmagic
      @hustlinmagic 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Actually they have committed to review Universal Credit and tackle poverty.
      They have not mentioned any cuts to disability benefits either. Unlike the Tories who have proposed 12.5 billion in cuts and a complete reworking of PIP.

    • @goonerboz6023
      @goonerboz6023 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@hustlinmagic liz kendall has said disability benefits need to be cut

    • @karlclark8625
      @karlclark8625 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      None of the cuts to disability benefits are in the manifesto.

    • @goonerboz6023
      @goonerboz6023 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@karlclark8625 dont need to be in it

  • @taliquetaylor8039
    @taliquetaylor8039 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    Quietly radical and the silence is deafening

    • @pjhenehan
      @pjhenehan 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why did the commentator mention the Republic of Ireland during the discussion on the Welsh manifesto and the jokeish call for Wales to enter Eurovision as a separate country? Most baffling. This is a discussion of the UK election. The Republic of Ireland is not part of or party to this. It does show a clearly nuanced disregard for the Republic of Ireland as an entity in the British media...

    • @lcg8220
      @lcg8220 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Perhaps you should read some of it, it's very carefully worded but it suggests potential parliamentary reform.

  • @ruairihair
    @ruairihair 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    Really really really quiet...

  • @TuggSpeedman-eh9ls
    @TuggSpeedman-eh9ls 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Spineless politicians and spineless media, complaining about biscuits- she’s had enough 😂

  • @stevecriddle
    @stevecriddle 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Presumably Brad had a Pitt Crew.

  • @Gomolon95
    @Gomolon95 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Never knew biscuits and Eurovision were the most important issues at this election 🙄

  • @Rachel-rw1ju
    @Rachel-rw1ju 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    We know its not radical because you guys are pushing it 😂

  • @donttrip8282
    @donttrip8282 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Oxymoron of the year: Quietly radical.

    • @Sam.o.29
      @Sam.o.29 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Not really. Radical isn't always in-your-face bells & whistles. A manifesto can seem mundane but be quietly transformative if delivered.

    • @therealrobertbirchall
      @therealrobertbirchall 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@Sam.o.29I think we are all sick of the tories being 'radical' thank you very much.

    • @andybrice2711
      @andybrice2711 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@therealrobertbirchall This Tory government is not at all radical. They’ve just let the same problems continue unaddressed as everything slowly decays.

    • @RobinHarris-nf4yv
      @RobinHarris-nf4yv 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You haven’t read it

  • @phil955i
    @phil955i 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    God help us

  • @jtmuso
    @jtmuso 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It’s reasons like placing a bet on the election happening, knowing that you will win the bet, that makes me happy that the Tory party will be no more. Their self-interest stinks and it’s made the country a poorer place in every measurable way

  • @WhichDoctor1
    @WhichDoctor1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One gp appointment provided through a private contractor will cost twice as much or more than an NHS GP. How is it more cost effective to use expensive contractors over cheaper in-house?

    • @alanhat5252
      @alanhat5252 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      True but since almost all GPs have been private & contracting to the NHS since it began in 1948 what difference are you trying to find? Dentists & opticians refused to join the NHS too.

    • @alanhat5252
      @alanhat5252 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're looking at the wrong end, look at the huge American "healthcare" conglomerates paying MPs for slices off the back of the NHS, the same acquisitive corporations that have bought most of the GPs. 😢
      Sir Simon Stevens, "saviour of the NHS", was owned by the American megacorp United Health. He now sits in the House of Lords. 😢

  • @RicB1976
    @RicB1976 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Hard to be radical when the country is on it's backside.

    • @TheHoveHeretic
      @TheHoveHeretic 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Largely the country's own effing fault. If we hadn't fallen for the tory propaganda machine and the allure of filthy lucre in 1979, just think .... that North Sea oil could have done the good for the UK which it did for Norway.
      Instead the oil barons buggered off with it and the dregs left here in taxes were used to prop up TINA's insane moneterist dogma in the form of unemployment benefit for 3 million people thrown on the scrap heap and the family silver flogged off for a pittance to tax dodging non doms ..... and here we are.

    • @luke7708
      @luke7708 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Attlee managed it in 1945.

    • @blairarcher8952
      @blairarcher8952 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Quite the opposite.

    • @enemywithin1295
      @enemywithin1295 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We also had an empire and much smaller population and less advanced technology.

    • @oliverstrahle
      @oliverstrahle 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Actually it's the time when you need radicalism

  • @peterdollins3610
    @peterdollins3610 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Labour voters are against the two child tax. Once in power Labour will try to persuade their voters to agree to this move. Keir is a political realist & will move as soon as he thinks any move is politically possible.

    • @andrewcharlton6080
      @andrewcharlton6080 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      He obviously wants to scrap the limit but without raising taxes they just can’t afford it. I hope the growth strategies start to work over the next year or two as I think that will open up far more spending by Labour on policies such as scrapping the child benefit limit and increases in funding for public services.

    • @floydcodlin8447
      @floydcodlin8447 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@andrewcharlton6080 If it helps you're both lying to yourselves

    • @briandelaney9710
      @briandelaney9710 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I wouldn’t hold my breath on that. I wish I could feel inspired by this Labour Front Bench but I’m not They look too managerial then radical reformers

    • @andrewcharlton6080
      @andrewcharlton6080 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@floydcodlin8447I’m not lying that there isn’t any money for these types of policies. The Tory’s have seen to that. Going forward I’m hoping there will be improvements, I can’t be lying when I’m not stating what will happen but what I hope to happen

    • @rogerhigman7568
      @rogerhigman7568 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@andrewcharlton6080 George Eaton said himself that the problem wasn't the money. It's that Labour doesn't want to look like a welfare party. Until this changes, the Tory press will run this country - as every time they accuse Labour of being profligate, Starmer will move further to the right.

  • @samwarrilow2881
    @samwarrilow2881 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Honestly what is this waffle? Are we going to get any information that isn’t about racing cars or biscuits?

    • @chrisc448
      @chrisc448 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You need to watch beyond the first 5 mins

  • @krispysox
    @krispysox 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Why does he keep scanning his surroundings like he's reporting from an active warzone? :)

    • @sfactory8253
      @sfactory8253 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because he's in the presence of war mongers and lords ? All I could think of .

  • @SFRZRD
    @SFRZRD 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do any of you realise just how much, and why, people despise you, the media?

  • @stevenwilliamson6236
    @stevenwilliamson6236 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The party of Wales wants to talk about Wales? Hard to believe.

    • @boxtradums0073
      @boxtradums0073 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When have the Anglo’s cared about anyone but themselves

  • @DylanSargesson
    @DylanSargesson 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    On the 2child cap that's the sort of thing that will be much easier to do in Government than in election.

    • @alanhat5252
      @alanhat5252 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Farage is against the 2-child cap...
      😂😂😂

  • @tomtheeagle1
    @tomtheeagle1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Get Steve Platt back as a proper left wing, principled and left wing intellectual editor!

  • @blackroseangel123
    @blackroseangel123 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    People seem to think labour not being "labour" at the moment is a bad thing but they tied that and it didn't work. They need to make a big show of some specific things to draw existing conservative voters and get in power.
    We need to remove an incredible toxic and destructive conservation party and ensure they don't get power again. The best thing we can do is have labour government with a strong lib dem opposition.
    Once in power labour have the luxary of a gradual shift to the left just how the Tories went to the right. If we swing too hard people will get whiplash and we'll end up with some incompetence and racist party like reform.

    • @alanhat5252
      @alanhat5252 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Labour "shift to the left" 😂😂😂
      Starmer's thrown the Left out of the party!

  • @EamonCoyle
    @EamonCoyle 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My issue is that they are not very clear on who that wealth will be created by and for !!

    • @ArtyFactual_Intelligence
      @ArtyFactual_Intelligence 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      All wealth is created by peoples' efforts. None of it is created by shifting numbers around on a betting chart. That's fake growth.

  • @fragglet
    @fragglet 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    Maybe Peter Hitchens was right after all about Starmer being a secret Trotskyist 😂😂😂🤣

    • @CGlance603
      @CGlance603 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      No secret. Starmer was editor for Pabloite/Trotskyite newspaper "Socialist Alternatives".

    • @goonerboz6023
      @goonerboz6023 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      How hes keeping every awful tory policy like universal credit and 2 chid cap and even wanting to cut disability benefits as liz kendall said

    • @goonerboz6023
      @goonerboz6023 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@CGlance603 well hes given up on that now

    • @FranzBieberkopf
      @FranzBieberkopf 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@CGlance603 What's a Pabloite?

    • @gio-oz8gf
      @gio-oz8gf 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Peter Hitchens lost his mind quite some time ago. Just because he speaks with an educated accent, it doesn't mean he talks sense.

  • @bfcmik
    @bfcmik 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Things like the 2 child limit can be added whenever the finances/political will warrant it. Putting it in the manifesto would be a focal point for attacks from the Tories and right wing media.

    • @tomtheeagle1
      @tomtheeagle1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      But it would at least be a point of principle and the fulfilment of a promise that Starmer made. The manifesto is a damp squib, as expected!

    • @boxtradums0073
      @boxtradums0073 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Labour are pro child benefit cap but anti bankers bonuses cap 🤣

  • @mrgaudy1954
    @mrgaudy1954 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’d say the most radical components were the hints towards electoral reform. Will be absolutely massive if they push for this.

  • @terry9819
    @terry9819 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Are you just taking up the role of Labour PR like Laura K was the PR for the Tories for 14 years?

  • @shaun906
    @shaun906 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    speaking softly but carrying a very big stick of change!

  • @davidjago1850
    @davidjago1850 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The dogged loyalty of the New Statesman is deeply touching!

  • @kerrynewnham8946
    @kerrynewnham8946 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Business’ is mentioned 60 times, ‘inequality’ only once. The comparator isn’t any other Labour leader - it’s the Tory Edward Heath
    But what kind of change? Not the kind you can count in cash. The extra money the Labour party plans to spend on local government, say, or to raise in taxes on the wealthy, is judged by the Institute for Fiscal Studies as “tiny going on trivial”.
    Farnsworth compared Starmer’s manifesto with Corbyn’s in 2017 and 2019, Wilson’s in 1964 and Clement Attlee’s of 1945. His first finding is that Starmer’s manifesto, in language and values, is way out of line with Labour tradition. Whether on state schools or universities, progressive taxation or pensioners, Corbyn was the heir to Wilson and Attlee. Where Corbyn’s manifestos are unusual in Labour history is in their emphasis on inequality - which is attacked with more frequency and force than in those of other Labour leaders. But Starmer’s manifesto is the complete opposite: it mentions the word inequality only once.
    That may be the great missed opportunity of this moment: that the public is ready for change of a kind that is simply not on offer. That a political system prizes continuity and stability over reform and fairness. That a Labour leader should boast of how much he has changed his party, so that it will not change the country.
    From this article guardian Drill into the policy, ignore the puffery: this is a Starmer manifesto more than a Labour one | Aditya Chakrabortty
    www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jun/15/policy-keir-starmer-manifesto-labour-business-tory

    • @alanhat5252
      @alanhat5252 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Excellent article except that Chakrabortty totally fails to mention that _change _*_IS_*_ on offer_ - on offer from the *Green Party!*
      #VoteWisely, #VoteGreen!
      They don't need to be in Government, they just need to be polling strong enough they can kick up a stink whenever Gov't gets it wrong!
      #VoteWisely, #VoteGreen!

    • @alanhat5252
      @alanhat5252 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for bringing this to our attention.

  • @aussietom85
    @aussietom85 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Y'all spend so much energy on tactics without discussing the merits of policy and strategy

  • @MrTzimisces
    @MrTzimisces 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    God this really is the worst type of client journalism

    • @ArtyFactual_Intelligence
      @ArtyFactual_Intelligence 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And what, prithee is client journalism, when it's at home?

  • @glynsmith4590
    @glynsmith4590 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sad that knowledgeable reporters/critics moan about lack of massive change! Presumably they think that there is spare money about, but they won't tell us where it is!!!!

    • @alanhat5252
      @alanhat5252 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      where are you getting "knowledgeable" from? 😂

  • @WorkersofBritain
    @WorkersofBritain 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Time for Labour and Conservative to go!
    Otherwise there will be no change.
    Time for a party that cares about the people:
    'THE WORKERS PARTY OF BRITAIN'
    - George Galloway. (Read Manifesto)

  • @anthonybrown4874
    @anthonybrown4874 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Any government of any party is kind of boxed in financially as Truss's approach showed that not doing the maths isn't acceptable.
    I hope that Labour can introduce some policies to ensure taxation is fairer and not so focussed on income and employment taxes.

    • @alanhat5252
      @alanhat5252 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're of course welcome to your hopes & dreams but in the world of cold hard reality the Green Party are the ones offering fairer taxation.

  • @user-xu5vl5th9n
    @user-xu5vl5th9n 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Thin gruel.

  • @terencerodgers4121
    @terencerodgers4121 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do you know that over the last two/3 years the NS magazine copy has been removed from our big four supermarket shelves.
    While the Spectator sits on the mid shelf.
    Why is that ?
    And who ordered it.
    Worth an investigation.

  • @stevenobinator2229
    @stevenobinator2229 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    HOW CAN BRITSH TALK SOOOOO MUCH AND SAY ABSOLUTELY NOTHING

    • @nolslifegren
      @nolslifegren 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Cos they middle class

    • @boxtradums0073
      @boxtradums0073 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Anglo’s you mean

  • @boxtradums0073
    @boxtradums0073 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    The Labour Party pro child benefit cap but anti bankers bonuses cap. Says it all really 🙄

    • @Sam.o.29
      @Sam.o.29 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Why cap bankers bonuses? Let them make their bonuses but tax them to high heaven, that's an idea.

    • @boxtradums0073
      @boxtradums0073 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Sam.o.29 aye sure that’s what Labour are going to do it’s not like they have already said they aren’t raising taxes. Gullible. This a giveaway by Reeves to her banker pals while an ever increasing amount of children live in poverty. The diet Tories

    • @boxtradums0073
      @boxtradums0073 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Sam.o.29aye sure they won’t find a loophole out of the many that already exists to avoid being taxed 🙄

    • @andybrice2711
      @andybrice2711 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@boxtradums0073 If you can find a way around the tax, then you can find a way around the cap, and have considerably more financial incentive to do so.
      Income caps are a fundamentally terrible idea. Taxes are inherently better.

    • @chrisc448
      @chrisc448 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@boxtradums0073so close the loopholes. If they're serious about growing the economy, they need to stop leaking money like a corporate water pipe, tax it properly and invest it in the public good.

  • @briandelaney9710
    @briandelaney9710 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Radical ??? Give me a break

  • @richardh8082
    @richardh8082 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Even parents who send their children to private schools say its hard to defend no vat on fees

  • @nev3i
    @nev3i 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Wheres the analysis?

  • @joshbrown6138
    @joshbrown6138 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Client journalism at its finest, there's nothing radcial about this manifesto, the policies are unambitious and wouldnt be suprised if we see a large number of voters particularly young and students voting for the greens and lib dems as an alternative

    • @cardwitch91
      @cardwitch91 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      As long as they aren’t voting Tory, that’s all good

    • @goych
      @goych 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@cardwitch91no one is voting Tory and if they do send them my way

    • @ruairihair
      @ruairihair 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      It's just more austerity and here they are celebrating the perpetuation of the misery we've become accustomed to.
      No new ideas, no real change.

    • @FranzBieberkopf
      @FranzBieberkopf 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      LibDems and Greens won't be in power so they can promise anything without needing to worry about delivery.

    • @joshbrown6138
      @joshbrown6138 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      What happened to the 2017 manifesto being the foundational document eh? Stuffed down the back of the sofa along with those 10 pledges from Starmer's leadership campaign. Regret believing him when I voted for him to be leader in 2020

  • @ifsanakauser7194
    @ifsanakauser7194 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    NOT VOTING LABOUR

    • @TrancetasticWilza
      @TrancetasticWilza 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Nobody cares

    • @stuartbeard966
      @stuartbeard966 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I am.

    • @boxtradums0073
      @boxtradums0073 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@stuartbeard966Tory

    • @stuartbeard966
      @stuartbeard966 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@boxtradums0073 no I'm voting Labour.

    • @boxtradums0073
      @boxtradums0073 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@stuartbeard966 because they are now the diet Tories

  • @obsolete9121
    @obsolete9121 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Kid Starver & The Friends of Genocide

    • @boxtradums0073
      @boxtradums0073 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not to mention Wes Thatcher

  • @somecuriosities
    @somecuriosities 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So quiet its no wonder we're left wondering by Sir Starmerer if Labour are actually substantively saying anything.

  • @RonaldShea5680
    @RonaldShea5680 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Unless or until political manifestos become legally binding they should be considered meaningless and worthless.

    • @alanhat5252
      @alanhat5252 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They're _morally_ binding, if you vote for MPs _with morals_ it works.

    • @disasterarea9341
      @disasterarea9341 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      there is an agreement with the house of lords which makes manifesto commitments significantly easier to get through the house of lords (this is called the salisbury convention and iirc was used to set up the NHS initially) so there is that but it's not a lot

  • @tonyryan1574
    @tonyryan1574 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    I'm voting reform

    • @welshaccenttutorials3104
      @welshaccenttutorials3104 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      My brain hurts

    • @tonyryan1574
      @tonyryan1574 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@welshaccenttutorials3104 My country hurts.

    • @finger3181
      @finger3181 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Due to right wing ideology

    • @stuartbeard966
      @stuartbeard966 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well done

    • @californiadreamin8423
      @californiadreamin8423 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@tonyryan1574. Who said it’s “your” country ?

  • @sherpafan033
    @sherpafan033 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    So immensely quiet that- it isn't radical at all.

  • @mdog111
    @mdog111 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If trying hard to come across as the new Tories is the New Statesman's version of 'quietly radical' then yes, Starmer's Labour are being quietly radical.

  • @davidwatts321
    @davidwatts321 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Quietly radical lol give it up will ya.

  • @professorjavedkhan4952
    @professorjavedkhan4952 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Highly appreciated

  • @ClarkyUKMIA
    @ClarkyUKMIA 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is no chance in hell you have described Beth Rigby's interviewing as a "masterclass". It was a car crash from start to finish, she spoke more than Kier and Sunak!

  • @AdamTFinch
    @AdamTFinch 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is that the sound of quiet radicalism just underneath the crickets chirruping and my tinnitus?

  • @martincheeseman5809
    @martincheeseman5809 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I am a Labour voter come on kier we are all waiting for you!

    • @andrewta55
      @andrewta55 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      If the ballot paper requires the correct spelling of his name, you’re going to spoil it.

    • @dmythica
      @dmythica 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Gross!

    • @zu438
      @zu438 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@andrewta55in fairness that is how the new statesman spelled it in the description:) luckily it won't affect their vote, no spelling required :)

    • @andrewta55
      @andrewta55 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I blame it on 14 years of conservative chaos and austerity in education 😂

    • @mrwu2
      @mrwu2 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@andrewta55no such thing

  • @rogerhigman7568
    @rogerhigman7568 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    What's interesting about George Eaton, as always, is what he doesn't say. Expecting improvements in services to come from efficiency savings and the greater involvement of the private sector is what David Cameron and George Osborne would have said fifteen years ago. Essentially, Labour plans to continue with austerity - even when the evidence shows it hurts the poor.

    • @boxtradums0073
      @boxtradums0073 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Exactly ! And some people actually think Labour aren’t going back to austerity. What do they think Wes Thatcher means when he says no money for the NHs without ‘reform’

    • @MrBoboiscool
      @MrBoboiscool 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Indeed, conservatives atomised the nhs and tony blair implemented privitisation… this has killed the nhs and will continue to do so its whole principle is a single payer having multiple moving parts ruins that. It is literally a david cameron manifesto and if that is radical the overton window has shifted beyond belief.

    • @karlclark8625
      @karlclark8625 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wes has said that he intends on looking at how the money is being spent, to find the funds for reform.

    • @boxtradums0073
      @boxtradums0073 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@karlclark8625 that’s called codespeak for austerity. Every single health secretary since 2010 has said the exact same thing 🤣. How is he going to pay for over the odds procedures to his private donor pals without cutting it from the existing NHS budget if there is no extra money being given ? It amazes me how financially illiterate and gullible most people are.

    • @andybrice2711
      @andybrice2711 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’d say the difference is when the Conservatives say they’re going to improve public services through private provision, it’s usually code for _“We’re going to asset strip this and sell it off to our mates.”_ When Labour say it, there’s a slim chance they might actually want to improve the service.

  • @stevenbrodie404
    @stevenbrodie404 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'd be curious to know if anyone that isn't a journalist cares whatsoever about the lack of biscuits. It honestly gives the same desperation from journos as Rishi complaining about not having Sky tv growing up

    • @alanhat5252
      @alanhat5252 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Journalists direct the voting of most of the electorate so their attitude towards the various parties is relevant.

  • @mrD66M
    @mrD66M 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting to see so many comments saying they won't vote Labour (no idea why they waste their time with crap they don't like) but still want to see the manifesto 🤔

    • @boxtradums0073
      @boxtradums0073 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They want to see the manifesto because there are enough gullible Anglo’s to vote for the diet Tory’s anyway 😉

  • @andrewta55
    @andrewta55 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    The contempt shown to the working people (and indeed those not working) is utterly disgraceful. Would be nice if there was a straight bat and integrity. Lots of smug turkeys are getting very excited by Christmas/4th July.

    • @gio-oz8gf
      @gio-oz8gf 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      What contempt would that be? How many pages of the manifesto have you read? I'm guessing none

    • @boxtradums0073
      @boxtradums0073 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@gio-oz8gfhow about their plan to cut disability benefits ? The fact they are already scaling back on abolishing ‘non dom’ status ?

    • @californiadreamin8423
      @californiadreamin8423 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @andrewta666……you are talking about 14 years of Tory fiscal incompetence ?

    • @StyledObject
      @StyledObject 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Jeremy Corbyn lost two elections, you need to get over it.

    • @andrewta55
      @andrewta55 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Trojan horse, with a spot of spite to throw to the union members. That’s the manifesto in a nutshell. I’m genuinely leaning between greens and Libs. Such a shame labour didn’t come out with any exciting flag bearing economic policies. Combine that with a manifesto commitment to not rejoin single market or eu… doomed. It’s a great winning strategy, but just more of the same smoke.

  • @georgethompson453
    @georgethompson453 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wonder how long it will be before the wheels on the bus start to fall off. By Christmas after the spending review!

  • @stuartbeard966
    @stuartbeard966 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It's time for a change and that's what we're going to get.

  • @jcanyiam8309
    @jcanyiam8309 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Tory Manifesto launch was a BRING YOUR OWN BISCUITS for the Press
    (NO MONEY LEFT)

  • @daviddowsett1658
    @daviddowsett1658 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Man she wanted some biscuits ....

    • @PERRITOCBA
      @PERRITOCBA 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      She did! Thorough debate on refreshments. Deep…

  • @peterdollins3610
    @peterdollins3610 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The betting shop would have limited such a bet. They'd only allow a hundred pounds on a political bet of that nature.

  • @johnmoorefilm
    @johnmoorefilm 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think the “racing-car/biscuits” Venn-overlap is almost 87%…..😮

  • @marcdavies6963
    @marcdavies6963 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Would someone please explain what labour actually mean by "making money for the British people" om regards to GB Energy

    • @alanhat5252
      @alanhat5252 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's an investment fund but it's massively restricted, unlike the one offered by Corbyn in 2017 & '19 or the Greens now.
      Most countries have them & they put money into the Treasury as the projects they fund mature but they've got to be bigger to work, vote for the Green's one.

  • @holgernielsen-ti8ej
    @holgernielsen-ti8ej 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Its impossible not to be distracted from what is being said when George in Manchester seem to have such a hard time keeping “eye-contact” with the camera. I keep asking myself what is so interesting in the room he is in that he is unable to concentrate on answering the questions. I gave up listening to him. Awful.

  • @chrisedwards2539
    @chrisedwards2539 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Money money money. I'm worried Starmer will over promise and then find things in such a mess...

    • @alanhat5252
      @alanhat5252 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Starmer has already under promised, he's offering #MoreOfTheSame & an intensification of the austerity we've been suffering since 2010

  • @chrishyde1216
    @chrishyde1216 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If Wales win Eurovision, which I now expect (I'm Welsh), they'll have to host and pay for it.

  • @johnmoorefilm
    @johnmoorefilm 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I had a “quietly radical” bowel-movement this morning…still not sure how i feel about it…?🧐

  • @andrewcalladine2507
    @andrewcalladine2507 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Capital gains tax should be in line with income tax, crazy that it isn't and would bring some consistency to the tax system as well as raising money from the top 1%.

    • @alanhat5252
      @alanhat5252 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Moving Dividends & Drawings from CGT into Income Tax is probably what you're looking for.

  • @running4fun863
    @running4fun863 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Rishi Sunak also said he drinks lots of Coke , I was a bit shocked as I miss understood and then realised what he said . You are right he should have had some suger

  • @wendyholland2339
    @wendyholland2339 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Sorry can't vote for that to make my country worst

    • @Hartley_Hare
      @Hartley_Hare 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Reform will do that.

    • @Sharpcarbon6
      @Sharpcarbon6 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Me neither! Reform for me too! 👍🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

    • @tomcampbell9081
      @tomcampbell9081 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@Sharpcarbon6thicko

  • @stevenwilliamson6236
    @stevenwilliamson6236 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm technically correct, the best kind of correct.

  • @johnholkham2420
    @johnholkham2420 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Rishi used Silverstone so he could get a fast getaway.

  • @woodsboyhunterskogsarmann
    @woodsboyhunterskogsarmann 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    number 1 priority = creation of wealth - for who? the already mega rich, starmer himself? certainly not ordinary people thats for sure

    • @Sam.o.29
      @Sam.o.29 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think Starmer is quite clear on his ambitions for 'normal people', he bangs on about them all the time and rightly so

    • @samturner8028
      @samturner8028 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're just here trying to push a narrative. Labour have been 100% clear for YEARS that they are not interested in a trickle down model, Starmer called it bullshit, the priority is growing the economy to support working people.

  • @Taporeee
    @Taporeee 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why are all the left and centre journos repeating the same line?

    • @alanhat5252
      @alanhat5252 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      which "line"?
      where are you finding "left & centre journos"?

    • @Taporeee
      @Taporeee 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@alanhat5252 "Radical"

    • @ArtyFactual_Intelligence
      @ArtyFactual_Intelligence 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Perhaps they all independently came to the same conclusion.
      Perhaps they read others' views before leaping to simplicities.

    • @Taporeee
      @Taporeee 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ArtyFactual_Intelligence Maybe they were very "Forensic"

    • @alanhat5252
      @alanhat5252 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ArtyFactual_Intelligence 🤣🤣🤣

  • @MonkeyWhoWouldBeKing
    @MonkeyWhoWouldBeKing 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "[Sunak] is known to be a good man -" ? like what?

  • @Sam-y5o6j
    @Sam-y5o6j 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What copium? Quietly radical.. ughh.. an empty manifesto.

  • @LondonSingh24
    @LondonSingh24 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Fedup from tories

  • @Taporeee
    @Taporeee 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Literally no council housing

    • @ArtyFactual_Intelligence
      @ArtyFactual_Intelligence 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Massive expenditure is needed on social housing.
      That would create a multiplier effect. It's simple Keynesian economics, and the resulting wealth has to be distributed fairly and you have Keynesian socialism - as practised after WW2- even 'Torily' by RAButler..

    • @Taporeee
      @Taporeee 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ArtyFactual_Intelligence It's an income multiplier.
      As more housing is built, rents drop leaving more disposable income for families to spend in the wider economy.
      Even Tory ministers historically built far more social housing; It's a POLITICAL choice now and the continent still builds far more housing via state.
      Nothing could be more financially burdensome than the 2nd world war. Ww built then and then sold off the housing post 80s with no replacements leading to severe house price inflation accelerated by financialisation of housing stock including the obscene transfer of ownership to buy to let landlords that borrowed cheap credit and benefitted from obscene tax incentives.
      Millions that would otherwise rent from the state or buy at cheaper prices, now simply rent property from the bank thst supplied corrupt credit to shyster landlords

  • @stevenwilliamson6236
    @stevenwilliamson6236 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    They are out of touch with humans and the necessity of eating.

    • @californiadreamin8423
      @californiadreamin8423 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are referring to the various Tory governments of the last 14 years ?

    • @stevenwilliamson6236
      @stevenwilliamson6236 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@californiadreamin8423 the people who organised the trip to Silverstone

  • @denniswinters3096
    @denniswinters3096 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Tories just can't help setting the wrong tone. I've never seen a government so disconnected from ordinary people as this one. Sunak dies a thousand deaths every time he makes an appearance. Not so much Shakespearian tragedy. More like a badly written episode of Hollyoaks.

  • @willienelsongonzalez4609
    @willienelsongonzalez4609 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Right because the tories were so liberal in all their policies ….. by your rationale Labour are the new tories ….

    • @alanhat5252
      @alanhat5252 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      well as it happens...

  • @mariamorgan8447
    @mariamorgan8447 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    RADICAL what planet are you 2 on

    • @mrwu2
      @mrwu2 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      One which hasn't been brainwashed by Sky News and the BBC presumably. The constitutional reforms planned by brown are indeed radical

  • @jasonsccheung3831
    @jasonsccheung3831 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Here's a good one:
    Saving of £15 billions... VAT on private school fees.
    Wait, isn't that taxation ?

    • @stuartbeard966
      @stuartbeard966 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's called good taxation.

    • @jasonsccheung3831
      @jasonsccheung3831 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@stuartbeard966 Tax on education is good ? Wow.

    • @stuartbeard966
      @stuartbeard966 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@jasonsccheung3831 tax on the elite is definitely a "wow" situation 👏

    • @jasonsccheung3831
      @jasonsccheung3831 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@stuartbeard966 Education, don't deflect.

    • @jasonsccheung3831
      @jasonsccheung3831 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@stuartbeard966 Calling it a saving is deceitful.

  • @nolslifegren
    @nolslifegren 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Radical ? Do me a favour

  • @mick947
    @mick947 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And this is a perfect example of what’s wrong with journalism! Just a bunch of smug entitled kids interested only in themselves and their status. Tea and biscuits..and brat pit. Says it all!

  • @davidmorrow4340
    @davidmorrow4340 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Biscuits, Eurovision and more sniggering at Tory gaffes under the title of Labour manifesto, really, is this the best the NS can do? Come on you’re better than this.

  • @boulevard14
    @boulevard14 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    She is really hungry.

  • @rhubarb2301
    @rhubarb2301 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Keir is spelled wrong in the description

  • @alexdavis1541
    @alexdavis1541 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    More like Britain, "finally meeting its Waterloo"