# 1. A give way is indeed a give way, but failing to recognise an obvious hazard and deciding to create an incident is also indicative of poor discipline.
0:20 If someone has already moved passed their giveway line, then you let them finish, even if you had priority over them, they were already almost done if you just let off the gas and slowed down a little
@@IN_THIS_DAY_AND_AGE The point is she shouldn't have been committed, the cam car was clearly visible and she was never going to be clear before they arrived at the obstruction. People seem to think that if they can start to enter the obstruction before oncoming traffic they can go, they can't, they have to give way to all oncoming traffic they would impede.
@@rjk69 the point is that she did commit, she'd already made that mistake and yet the cammer STILL tried to impede her and slow down the flow of traffic for the sake of being right. Saying that the cammer is a c*nt for not just letting her go is not saying that she should've have committed to the move in the first place.
@@rjk69 cam car was miles behind the van and had he followed the road rules would have slowed and allowed her to complete her manouvre. she has right of way over cammer. and i assume that YOU are the cammer.
#5 if legal, has passed their test and thus perfectly legal to not have L plates. Their professionalism in letting faster traffic pass, is on display. Who ever the rider is. Well Done.
Although the overtake was performed at a no overtaking sign, presumably there because of the junction on the right. Not a safe place to be in the wrong carriageway.
@@DashCamSheffield ok, I'll give you that, it could be an 'end' sign - the video is not clear enough. Nevertheless, rule 167 says DO NOT overtake approaching a junction.
@@Simon-zv4hi That is utterly irrelevant, "give way to oncoming traffic", if you can't clear the obstruction before the car with priority you have to give way and wait. Getting there first does NOT give you priority.
@@bikeman123 Show me where in the highway code it says any different to what I have posted. "Give priority to oncoming traffic" that means you do not impede the oncoming traffic in exactly the same way as it does at any give way junction. Do you pull out in front of oncoming traffic just because you can cross the give way line before the oncoming traffic?
@@Lilith-Rose I ride a 100cc on a CBT and don't have the L plate on the back because there is literally nowhere for it to go. The guy on the clip is almost certainly not on a full licence either. To be fair to @mightywatcher5894 most car drivers see the L plate and decide they need to pass you immediately regardless of if you are doing the speed limit or if it's safe. Not condoning it, just saying...
#1 the driver of the “give way” car had crossed the dashed white line. Yes, they should have looked further ahead and seen the approaching cam car, but once past that line they are not obliged in law to “give way” that’s why they painted the line.
So if I pull out of a side road while someone is going 60mph. Is that okay too since I’ve gone over the give way line? No obviously not. The give way car has to GIVE WAY. If you disrupt the car with the main priority. You haven’t given way to them.
@@ReeceJCoxy For a t junction though if you did that you would hardly be using common sense for cars approaching you at 60, so i think here in this case @theonlywoody2shoes is pointing out here is for the merits of this case is correct easy to fix situation allow to clear no great drama.
What is the minimum amount of room stipulated in the highway code? The amount of room which most police forces now use as the test for whether it constitutes careless driving?
3:48 the same thing happened to me about 5 years ago, but much much closer. I reacted in the same way. Out jumped a crackhead with a knife who charged me. I dropped my bike and he chased me a good 50m up the road brandishing a knife. I now know better than to react in such a way. There are pyhcos on the road, theres nowt you can do.
at 2:16 the driver of the camera vehicle embarks on an overtake , right where there are NO OVERTAKING signs on both sides of the road Points , fine and a ban for that - kind of him to provide the evidence for his own conviction .
#5, i used to do this when i rode a moped. I often rode centrally if the road was not clear ahead then would move left and wave them past when clear. If it was a Artic over taking i would also flash them letting them know it’s safe to pull back in. It’s simple little things like that that make the roads a safer place, especially if you’re doing 32mph on an A road with a 44 tonne artic breathing down your neck.
@@jdb47gamesI'm glad someone else said that. I thought I was the only one. I honestly thought that as the HGV overtook by that junction that we were going to see the bike turning right.
Not sure about the red circle I have no clue. I thought the text referred to the HGV rapidly, repeatedly switching lanes and driving for a while in the right-hand lane (forbidden to HGVs). I notice a gov UK page that says "avoid regular lane changing", but that just inflames the pedant in me which asks "what's wrong with a lane change every Friday lunchtime?" I think they mean "frequent"?
No 5, Yes Mr Cloudmaker..the rider was experienced and aware. Your right to praise doesn’t carry a lot of weight though as you chose to overtake him dangerously at a junction. 😂
Police won't do anything as cyclist swore at the driver. Disgusting but if you are in a car and they swear at you police seem to think that's permission to commit assult
Unfortunately most police forces will see the swearing (especially in the manner done by this cyclist - first one understandable-ish, second one was needless and the final one was excessive) as instigating the confrontation. It isn’t right but the best thing is to let them be and report them. Even if they can’t be fully prosecuted the driver / owner is usually sent a letter
@@smilerbob - so I drive way too close to a cyclist. Have him, understandably, get mad at me. Then wait and ram them off the road and nothing will happen?
2:00 it's nice to see low capacity bikes been showcased doing well in this clip instead of the usual slew of moped thieves or delivery peds. I ride a Speedfight 2 100cc and you'd be surprised how fast it is (the guy in the clip could easily still be on a learner license). Also I always try to help lorries and trucks as much as possible and usually find them to be very nice compared to other road users.
#13 sorry to victim blame but you’ve spotted the hazard in so much time. Tried to alert the van driver and then somehow haven’t managed to avoid running over the buckets yourself. If it was me I would’ve got myself out that lane asap. Saw it coming a mile off.
@@TheLink1977 again I don’t want to victim blame but the amount of videos I see where the cammer identifies and appallingly dangerous driver, and then proceeds to drive as close to them as possible…
#1 is a complete non issue. So what if it says give way to your side. The other car arrived there long before you did. Let them go so you can both carry on with your day. No need to make a big issue out of something so minor.
Had the rider just got on with the ride there would be no issue. I understand the close pass but he escalated the situation and paved the way for the problem by the gestures
@@dickelg the driver was wrong on both accounts. I don't doubt he's one of those sad fucks who thinks cyclists have no right to be on the roads but backed down as soon as he got his pot belly out of his pathetic little car.
@dickelg "there would be no issue" I hate when people use this line as it completely glosses over and dismisses the fact thatbthere WAS an issue, the shit driving position! Stop using lines like this, it shifts blame to the cyclist, implying that everyone should just move on. No, we shouldn't, we should hold people accountable. Since when does being gestured at equate to reversing your car into someone, damaging their property and putting them at risk of severe injury?
oh give your head a shake ... The Toyota was past him and would have driven off into the distance never to be seen again .. Drama caused when there was no need for it ... @@MW-km2uj
#1 You not just letting them through so every one can get on with their day shows poor discipline on your behalf. #8 You’re following way to close for the speed of the road and weather conditions, you removed the ability for that driver in front to brake to avoid the hazard.
Situtations like #7 fascinate me simply because of the fact so many motorists choose to be threatening and demand that a cyclist accepts their definition of what's safe on the road when the situation could put the latter's life in danger. Most motorists you see in videos like this are very quick to argue the toss when another motorist does something they think is stupid or dangerous on the road. Yet they seem to expect someone on a bike to doff their proverbial cap and just accpet it.
#3 happened to me last year, guy in a pick up cut across me on the roundabout, entering my lane, cutting me off, then swerved back left, when both our lanes exited the roundabout. I was driving a bright red Transit and I started to flash and beep as he started cutting across, but he kept doing it. I followed him for a bit, he pulled into a MacDonald's drive through, so I parked up, waited until he was about to get served, stepped between him and the window and gave him a bollocking about his driving. He was quite embarrassed, as the MacDonalds server thought it was hilarious.
Agreed. Never let someone else make driving decisions for you. They won't receive the points or have to claim on their insurance when you have an accident.
i reckon if the camera was better the signs would say End under the signd meaning an end to the no overtaking area, but unless someone knows the road and we can google maps it we will not know. the start of that clip shows no overtaking signs which add to the road markings in that sectione which make me think its an End sign as the HGV makes the overtake.
#3 1:21 why would the company contact him? How would they even know how their drivers are driving? Did the driver of the truck contact the company and complain about the driver?
On #1 what planet did you pass your test, your inconsiderate driving shows you were in the wrong there! Very clearly you should have given way as the oncoming car was closer to the width restriction. You ignored the ‘Slow’ sign too! #7 Gestures like that will get your lights punched out mate!
3:30 Whilst the cyclist shouldn't have been making hand gestures, I hope someone reported that driver for creating a hazard then trying to reverse into the bike. Deserves a ban for that stupid behaviour.
In my experience, it's not that unusual for a slow motorcyclist to move over to the left and indicate left to signal traffic to overtake. I used to do it on my bike before I passed my test and got something fast enough.
5, When I rode bikes I had a classic 150, not fast but I liked riding it. I would always pull in to let heavy goods overtake when safe, plus flash when they were passed. On my bigger bike always position where you can see the driver in his mirror. You see him, he sees you. 7, ropey 4X4✔️ loads of crap in the back, including traffic cone for illegal parking✔️ poacher/badger baiter?
It was the HGV that moved out to the outside lane to pass cars. For a start, as an HGV he shouldn't be using the outside lane at all and quite probably exceeded his 60 limit in order to pass the cars and other truck. He also made a several sudden lane changes.
@@catfrab I think the lane change looked worse because it was speeded up. I was trying to work out what the gantry said for lanes. Thought maybe there was a reason he went into lane 3 (other than he’s a tit)
3:50 He's only seen the cyclist's hand gestures because he deliberately close passed to provoke a reaction. I hope the cyclist used the footage to report him. Mind you the police will probably be more offended by the hand gestures than the dangerous driving.
Weather or not the driver gave the cyclist enough room, there is no excuse for the cyclist to behave in an aggressive manor. Hand signals and verbal abuse.
You can have a 125cc license these days, not a CBT, it's specifically for people that only want a 125cc for commuting or courier work but don't want to have to keep doing their CBT every two years.
#14: This area is rife with absolute nozzles who cant wait in a queue for a few seconds. Been numerous accidents here with people in the wrong lanes, despite clear signs and markings.
@@Alan_Clark The traffic was hardly moving so your 'tailgating' is a little overdramatic. He came close to the rear of the van as it appeared traffic was coming to a halt but then changed lanes to avoid delay. There was no danger posed by any of his manoeuvres and, despite your claim to the contrary, he signalled before each manoeuvre.
He was closer to the front of the truck than it looks also if the cars in front braked hard he had no time to react. He also left little room for the truck to react then moves into the left lane without proper look. If this is the way you drive then good luck to you your will need it. 🤠
@@pgbaines65 Supposition. He would have been able to see ahead as he passed the lorry and had time to brake if required. He was moving faster than the lorry so there was no danger as he was clear of it. Again, supposition that he didn't look. I'd be surprised if he hadn't. Don't forget he would have been able to see to the left of the lorry before passing it. I comment as someone with a great deal of driving experience so your patronising comment is not required, thank you.
That was bad driving, never overtake at a junction as per highway code and never overtake at a no overtaking sign, dangerous and illegal overtake by the cammer.@@craiggerrard5117
Tip for van drivers, make sure to clean out the gap thats sort of between your back bumper and rear doors. I notced my van doors wasnt closing properly everything looked fine but i ended scraping like 30 screws out of the gap between the bumper and its perfect again. Its weird as removing the screws didnt actually look like removing them did anything but made a big diffrence with the door closing.
#3 regardless of the driving from the van, checking mirrors once and not while on the actual roundabout and then being surprised by the van? terrible observation.
I have learned from these videos and from US ones, not to make any jestures or lights or sounds if a driver does a close call on me or plays silly games cutting in. I just give the buxxer room. S/he might be unpredictably aggressive in return for my expression of annoyance.
Either there's a disturbing increase in the number of Muppets who don't care about having crashes or there's a lot more criminals driving stolen vehicles. But speeding on clear road is easier to fine you for than kamikaze driving.
It's not so much as more criminals stealing cars... it's more just a case that with the advent of more motorists using dash cams; more stolen cars are being captured in footage...!
Now the law has changed, unless you have a voice activated camera pressing save in illegal whilst in motion. I understand it if it is going to be used as evidence but if not re aware
0:16 What the heck is all this road obstruction ? Besides that, I must say the cammer kept a considerable gap between himself and the truck he should have foreseen that the opposing traffic would move threw the blockade and just slow down and accommodate. Poor discipline on the cammer's behalf. 3:31 Just your typical cyclist vs a typical moron. nothing new. 6:32 That is not a trick ! That's just bad driving.
#1 "theres someone in my way so I'm gonna keep driving into them because im a nobhead"
# 1. A give way is indeed a give way, but failing to recognise an obvious hazard and deciding to create an incident is also indicative of poor discipline.
It also advises ‘slow’ and the cammer didn’t.
They got further than you did which suggests it was yourself who should have given way.
@@Daniel-S1what?
@@Daniel-S1 That is wrong in law.
@@CycolacFanIndeed.
0:20 If someone has already moved passed their giveway line, then you let them finish, even if you had priority over them, they were already almost done if you just let off the gas and slowed down a little
or - hear me out - stupid drivers don't try to force their way through....
@@dragonsmonkthat’s what he’s just described
You don't get priority by passing the give way line despite what half the users on youtube would have you believe.
@@rjk69 if you're past the give way line then you dont have to give way anymore especially when cammer should have slowed downb
Just needed to slow down a bit and not cause the aggro. Drivers like this are pricks.
#1 Ah didums had to wait for all of 3 seconds. Perhaps if he had given her a little bit of room?
Or she had given way and waited for the same 3 seconds?
@@rjk69
She was already committed.
He sped up.
@@IN_THIS_DAY_AND_AGE The point is she shouldn't have been committed, the cam car was clearly visible and she was never going to be clear before they arrived at the obstruction. People seem to think that if they can start to enter the obstruction before oncoming traffic they can go, they can't, they have to give way to all oncoming traffic they would impede.
@@rjk69 the point is that she did commit, she'd already made that mistake and yet the cammer STILL tried to impede her and slow down the flow of traffic for the sake of being right. Saying that the cammer is a c*nt for not just letting her go is not saying that she should've have committed to the move in the first place.
@@rjk69 cam car was miles behind the van and had he followed the road rules would have slowed and allowed her to complete her manouvre. she has right of way over cammer. and i assume that YOU are the cammer.
#5 if legal, has passed their test and thus perfectly legal to not have L plates. Their professionalism in letting faster traffic pass, is on display. Who ever the rider is. Well Done.
Absolutely!!
Although the overtake was performed at a no overtaking sign, presumably there because of the junction on the right. Not a safe place to be in the wrong carriageway.
@@martinbulmer1868 incorrect, it was just after the no overtaking section.
nope, clearly at the no overtaking section and a junction, the no overtaking sign is clearly visible on the left before the junction@@DashCamSheffield
@@DashCamSheffield ok, I'll give you that, it could be an 'end' sign - the video is not clear enough. Nevertheless, rule 167 says DO NOT overtake approaching a junction.
That twunt reversing into the bike should never be allowed to hold a driving license ever again.
And what exactly did you achieve there #1 by going towards an obvious hazard?
Yep she had already passed the Give Way Line
@@Simon-zv4hi That is utterly irrelevant, "give way to oncoming traffic", if you can't clear the obstruction before the car with priority you have to give way and wait. Getting there first does NOT give you priority.
@MrTVx99 Have you a driving licence? You clearly dont know the rules of the road.
@@bikeman123 Show me where in the highway code it says any different to what I have posted. "Give priority to oncoming traffic" that means you do not impede the oncoming traffic in exactly the same way as it does at any give way junction. Do you pull out in front of oncoming traffic just because you can cross the give way line before the oncoming traffic?
Rules of the road ?, hmmm, priority is given?@@bikeman123
Loved that from the biker, probably still only a 125 engine but the guy has a full licence hence no L plates and being a decent rider
shame about the cammer though
Was going to say exactly that.
Me too
@mightywatcher5894 so you were riding illegally and without valid insurance. Very clever of you.
@@Lilith-Rose I ride a 100cc on a CBT and don't have the L plate on the back because there is literally nowhere for it to go. The guy on the clip is almost certainly not on a full licence either. To be fair to @mightywatcher5894 most car drivers see the L plate and decide they need to pass you immediately regardless of if you are doing the speed limit or if it's safe. Not condoning it, just saying...
#1 the driver of the “give way” car had crossed the dashed white line. Yes, they should have looked further ahead and seen the approaching cam car, but once past that line they are not obliged in law to “give way” that’s why they painted the line.
So if I pull out of a side road while someone is going 60mph. Is that okay too since I’ve gone over the give way line?
No obviously not. The give way car has to GIVE WAY. If you disrupt the car with the main priority. You haven’t given way to them.
Priority is given, not taken. Would you continue driving into the car, just because you were right?
@@ReeceJCoxy That's a stupid comparison. If that is your thought process then you're brain dead.
@@ReeceJCoxy For a t junction though if you did that you would hardly be using common sense for cars approaching you at 60, so i think here in this case @theonlywoody2shoes is pointing out here is for the merits of this case is correct easy to fix situation allow to clear no great drama.
@@LastOnSunday Priority is assigned by the road planners and indicated by the Give Way marks.
#7 if he truly believed he'd given you plenty of room he wouldn't have been checking his rear mirror to see how you reacted.
It did look like loads of room to me.
Not really. You should always be checking your rear mirror. I'm not excusing his shit driving but you clearly can't drive properly either.
What is the minimum amount of room stipulated in the highway code? The amount of room which most police forces now use as the test for whether it constitutes careless driving?
@@Daniel-S1 To hand your licence back the address is DVLA, Swansea, SA99 1BN.
1.5m
3:48 the same thing happened to me about 5 years ago, but much much closer. I reacted in the same way. Out jumped a crackhead with a knife who charged me. I dropped my bike and he chased me a good 50m up the road brandishing a knife. I now know better than to react in such a way. There are pyhcos on the road, theres nowt you can do.
First clip is just being a twat, oncoming car had committed well before he was even near AND he sped up to stop the car crossing. Regarded driver.
Disagree, piss-taking arsehole, I'd have made them reverse back, maybe they would then think twice about doing that again.
So it wasn't JUST me who though the cammer sped up to make the issue worse...
at 2:16 the driver of the camera vehicle embarks on an overtake , right where there are NO OVERTAKING signs on both sides of the road Points , fine and a ban for that - kind of him to provide the evidence for his own conviction .
5:33 For those living outside the UK, heavy goods vehicles are not allowed in the outside lane of a motorway.
When 3 lanes or more
The right hand lane being underused by car drivers
#1 created that.
#5, i used to do this when i rode a moped. I often rode centrally if the road was not clear ahead then would move left and wave them past when clear. If it was a Artic over taking i would also flash them letting them know it’s safe to pull back in. It’s simple little things like that that make the roads a safer place, especially if you’re doing 32mph on an A road with a 44 tonne artic breathing down your neck.
it is not for one road user to tell another when to overtake. That does not make the roads safer.
in this case it was not safe at all, illegal and dangerous overtake
@@jdb47gamesI'm glad someone else said that. I thought I was the only one. I honestly thought that as the HGV overtook by that junction that we were going to see the bike turning right.
Truck overtook past a junction like a numpty
@@georgebarnes8163 why was the HGV's overtake of the scooter rider illegal?
I don't understand #9. At 5:22 who is aggressive and what does the little red circle highlight?
Not sure about the red circle I have no clue. I thought the text referred to the HGV rapidly, repeatedly switching lanes and driving for a while in the right-hand lane (forbidden to HGVs). I notice a gov UK page that says "avoid regular lane changing", but that just inflames the pedant in me which asks "what's wrong with a lane change every Friday lunchtime?" I think they mean "frequent"?
Thanks love these compilations
No 5, Yes Mr Cloudmaker..the rider was experienced and aware. Your right to praise doesn’t carry a lot of weight though as you chose to overtake him dangerously at a junction. 😂
Again... Glad I am not the only one who had this thought. I was half expecting the bike to turn right into the turning at the last minute.
Completely agree
#7 needs reporting to the Police
Police won't do anything as cyclist swore at the driver. Disgusting but if you are in a car and they swear at you police seem to think that's permission to commit assult
Unfortunately most police forces will see the swearing (especially in the manner done by this cyclist - first one understandable-ish, second one was needless and the final one was excessive) as instigating the confrontation. It isn’t right but the best thing is to let them be and report them. Even if they can’t be fully prosecuted the driver / owner is usually sent a letter
@@smilerbob - so I drive way too close to a cyclist. Have him, understandably, get mad at me. Then wait and ram them off the road and nothing will happen?
@@dragonsmonkPretty much what happens most of the time. Police don't care and that's why you get driving like that.
@@garyboyle695 Just wow... O.o
#5 2:27 Dangerous overtake opposite a blind junction.
2:00 it's nice to see low capacity bikes been showcased doing well in this clip instead of the usual slew of moped thieves or delivery peds.
I ride a Speedfight 2 100cc and you'd be surprised how fast it is (the guy in the clip could easily still be on a learner license). Also I always try to help lorries and trucks as much as possible and usually find them to be very nice compared to other road users.
Then the truck overtook past a junction like an amateur
#7, yes, loads of room for Mr Roadrage.
#13 sorry to victim blame but you’ve spotted the hazard in so much time. Tried to alert the van driver and then somehow haven’t managed to avoid running over the buckets yourself. If it was me I would’ve got myself out that lane asap. Saw it coming a mile off.
Yeah what a donut. Who continues to drive behind a van with its doors open, with god knows what falling out!? 😂
@@TheLink1977 again I don’t want to victim blame but the amount of videos I see where the cammer identifies and appallingly dangerous driver, and then proceeds to drive as close to them as possible…
#1 is a complete non issue. So what if it says give way to your side. The other car arrived there long before you did. Let them go so you can both carry on with your day. No need to make a big issue out of something so minor.
Hope #7 was reported to the police. Absolute muppet.
yeah the Cyclist was an asshole wasn't he .. Needs to discover girls / lose his virginity ..might make him grow the fuck up a bit.
Had the rider just got on with the ride there would be no issue. I understand the close pass but he escalated the situation and paved the way for the problem by the gestures
@@dickelg the driver was wrong on both accounts. I don't doubt he's one of those sad fucks who thinks cyclists have no right to be on the roads but backed down as soon as he got his pot belly out of his pathetic little car.
@dickelg "there would be no issue"
I hate when people use this line as it completely glosses over and dismisses the fact thatbthere WAS an issue, the shit driving position!
Stop using lines like this, it shifts blame to the cyclist, implying that everyone should just move on. No, we shouldn't, we should hold people accountable. Since when does being gestured at equate to reversing your car into someone, damaging their property and putting them at risk of severe injury?
oh give your head a shake ... The Toyota was past him and would have driven off into the distance never to be seen again .. Drama caused when there was no need for it ... @@MW-km2uj
#1 You not just letting them through so every one can get on with their day shows poor discipline on your behalf.
#8 You’re following way to close for the speed of the road and weather conditions, you removed the ability for that driver in front to brake to avoid the hazard.
Seems a lot of people have learnt to drive on GTA😮
If you see a van in front of you on the road with the back doors swinging open, I’d advise on not being behind it ASAP!
First clip was made into a problem by the cammer. A simple ease off would have had everyone on their way much sooner. Priority is given, not taken!
#7 Dang! That sounds like KennithR from awhile back on another UK channel
#5 - Left indicator? I've always used the right!
Was that John Everton from Liverpool or John from Everton, Liverpool?
Situtations like #7 fascinate me simply because of the fact so many motorists choose to be threatening and demand that a cyclist accepts their definition of what's safe on the road when the situation could put the latter's life in danger. Most motorists you see in videos like this are very quick to argue the toss when another motorist does something they think is stupid or dangerous on the road. Yet they seem to expect someone on a bike to doff their proverbial cap and just accpet it.
#3 happened to me last year, guy in a pick up cut across me on the roundabout, entering my lane, cutting me off, then swerved back left, when both our lanes exited the roundabout. I was driving a bright red Transit and I started to flash and beep as he started cutting across, but he kept doing it. I followed him for a bit, he pulled into a MacDonald's drive through, so I parked up, waited until he was about to get served, stepped between him and the window and gave him a bollocking about his driving. He was quite embarrassed, as the MacDonalds server thought it was hilarious.
...and then the whole restaurant clapped.
@@jdb47games I wish, but it was a drive through, so I was basically ranting outdoors.
Are you proud that you followed someone to tell them off?
@@chrisshaw3939Are you proud of your comment?
Sounds like you were a quarter pounder on that occasion.
Ive seen some close shave near misses in my time and now I've seen some more
2:33 maybe he was a lorry driver on his bike :o)
first clip, cammer 100% wrong, no question.
#5, pity the cammer was invited to overtake as he passed a sign forbidding overtaking at 2:26...!
Agreed. Never let someone else make driving decisions for you. They won't receive the points or have to claim on their insurance when you have an accident.
i reckon if the camera was better the signs would say End under the signd meaning an end to the no overtaking area, but unless someone knows the road and we can google maps it we will not know.
the start of that clip shows no overtaking signs which add to the road markings in that sectione which make me think its an End sign as the HGV makes the overtake.
@@douglasreid699 Hello Sir, you are indeed correct about the 'END' sign. The no overtaking area was the previous 1650 yards, I believe.
#3 1:21 why would the company contact him? How would they even know how their drivers are driving? Did the driver of the truck contact the company and complain about the driver?
Number three he ain’t learning them to drive he’s learning them to pass the test
2:05 If you passed your car test before 1st February 2001 you don't need L plates (or to take a CBT) to ride a moped.
1st one needs to retake test if he did that on it would fail
0:34 No roadworks on Oldham Inner Ring Road!
On #1 what planet did you pass your test, your inconsiderate driving shows you were in the wrong there! Very clearly you should have given way as the oncoming car was closer to the width restriction.
You ignored the ‘Slow’ sign too!
#7 Gestures like that will get your lights punched out mate!
3:30 Whilst the cyclist shouldn't have been making hand gestures, I hope someone reported that driver for creating a hazard then trying to reverse into the bike. Deserves a ban for that stupid behaviour.
In my experience, it's not that unusual for a slow motorcyclist to move over to the left and indicate left to signal traffic to overtake. I used to do it on my bike before I passed my test and got something fast enough.
5:06 i think the van driver in lane 2 is also a concern
I have literally never heard the phrase "on the ball" before and then it was used in this video twice 😅
#10 Drive it like you stole it...! Honestly it probably has been... 🤔😯
I hope the 'close pass' video was sent to the Police. Deserves 'loadsa points'.
#9 only the black Land Rover indicated out of all the cars in that clip that's more shocking
#14 7:34 bad road layout & right hand lane underused
5, When I rode bikes I had a classic 150, not fast but I liked riding it. I would always pull in to let heavy goods overtake when safe, plus flash when they were passed. On my bigger bike always position where you can see the driver in his mirror. You see him, he sees you. 7, ropey 4X4✔️ loads of crap in the back, including traffic cone for illegal parking✔️ poacher/badger baiter?
6:25 low loader, not a car transporter.
#9 what am I missing. Who is cammer talking about the coach? Too many large vehicles to keep track of in that clip 😂
I’m glad I’m not the only one confused. I think he’s moaning about the HGV that overtook him
@@striker2fall1 oh maybe I just have Aggressive HGVs in my area but that seemed totally normal to me 😂😂
@@ChaseWilder fully agree but that’s all I can see, he seems abit close to the cars in front but that’s all
It was the HGV that moved out to the outside lane to pass cars. For a start, as an HGV he shouldn't be using the outside lane at all and quite probably exceeded his 60 limit in order to pass the cars and other truck. He also made a several sudden lane changes.
@@catfrab I think the lane change looked worse because it was speeded up. I was trying to work out what the gantry said for lanes. Thought maybe there was a reason he went into lane 3 (other than he’s a tit)
7:27 that’s not a proper hard shoulder on the M66
Anybody know where that guy was going?
Drivers don't need to tell cyclists they own a car by revving or going flat out to pass them...
safer to get past quickly and back on correct side again
#5 why does it sound like your in the digestive system of a hump back whale?
3:50 He's only seen the cyclist's hand gestures because he deliberately close passed to provoke a reaction. I hope the cyclist used the footage to report him. Mind you the police will probably be more offended by the hand gestures than the dangerous driving.
Weather or not the driver gave the cyclist enough room, there is no excuse for the cyclist to behave in an aggressive manor. Hand signals and verbal abuse.
#14, this is what happens when Mummy and Daddy have the same parents.
The nighttime one at 5:30, he needs banning now.
#13 6:55. Lane one awaits your arrival...( and you would also have avoided the bucket.)
An indicator flashing does not give right of way to allow people to pass, its merely an indication of an intended manoeuvre to pull in or turn.
I love how poorly designed that first road is. "Yeah just have it randomly narrow down to a single lane right here for no particular reason"
That's what's called traffic calming
You can have a 125cc license these days, not a CBT, it's specifically for people that only want a 125cc for commuting or courier work but don't want to have to keep doing their CBT every two years.
#2 is not actually an instructor, it's just a car with an L plate. It doesn't mean it's driven by a learner driver.
It had the name of the driving school on the side and if this is how he drives what is he teaching his pupils❓🤠
@@pgbaines65 But there is absolutely nothing wrong with how he is driving. What do you imagine the problem is?
#2 just because he isnt driving like you doesnt make him a bad driver.
how do some people get driving licenses
#14: This area is rife with absolute nozzles who cant wait in a queue for a few seconds. Been numerous accidents here with people in the wrong lanes, despite clear signs and markings.
#8 Don't be posting videos in if you cannot obay the Highway Code yourself.
1:45, not only is he a shit driver, but disrespectfully flips off the innocent party, that's the type of behaviour that gets you tapped up.
In the second clip the car driver did nothing wrong.
He tailgates a car, tailgates a van, steals the cammer's safety margin, and changes lane without signalling first.
@@Alan_Clark The traffic was hardly moving so your 'tailgating' is a little overdramatic. He came close to the rear of the van as it appeared traffic was coming to a halt but then changed lanes to avoid delay. There was no danger posed by any of his manoeuvres and, despite your claim to the contrary, he signalled before each manoeuvre.
He was closer to the front of the truck than it looks also if the cars in front braked hard he had no time to react. He also left little room for the truck to react then moves into the left lane without proper look. If this is the way you drive then good luck to you your will need it. 🤠
@@pgbaines65 Supposition. He would have been able to see ahead as he passed the lorry and had time to brake if required. He was moving faster than the lorry so there was no danger as he was clear of it. Again, supposition that he didn't look. I'd be surprised if he hadn't. Don't forget he would have been able to see to the left of the lorry before passing it. I comment as someone with a great deal of driving experience so your patronising comment is not required, thank you.
What a tit the driver of the first video is, if the opposing traffic has crossed the stop line, you should allow them through
Was #5 a wholesome dashcam video? I'm not sure how to feel now...
I'd say boring rather than wholesome., We watch this channel for bad driving, not good manners.
That was bad driving, never overtake at a junction as per highway code and never overtake at a no overtaking sign, dangerous and illegal overtake by the cammer.@@craiggerrard5117
Hey #2 what helicopter do you fly ? lol
#7. 3:34 We can see where only one hand steering gets you.
Tip for van drivers, make sure to clean out the gap thats sort of between your back bumper and rear doors. I notced my van doors wasnt closing properly everything looked fine but i ended scraping like 30 screws out of the gap between the bumper and its perfect again. Its weird as removing the screws didnt actually look like removing them did anything but made a big diffrence with the door closing.
#12's in Liverpool, #13's listening to a Beatles song. That has to be intentional.
#3 regardless of the driving from the van, checking mirrors once and not while on the actual roundabout and then being surprised by the van? terrible observation.
12# this is why the standard of driving on our roads is getting worse , its the standards of teaching that is causing this
#10 you just know that had this been a head on smash, idiot driver would be the only one to survive.
#9 5:34. The driver needs extra coaching.
4:16 I would like to read what the police said when the cyclist has shown them the video.
Sadly probably nothing.
They would probably say he was lucky they weren't giving him a ticket for swearing. They really are that bad.
Hopefully charged him with aggressive cycling.
0:55 Perhaps it was a student driving.
Sometimes I see the shitty manoeuvres, as shown on here and wonder whether it's actually worth the trouble!
For the record, it's an offence to display L plates if you have a full motorcycle licence on any cc motorcycle/scooter.
Unless you are 2 up and the rider in control doesn't have a full licence.
you can not carry a passenger on a motorcycle if you are a learner.@@Daniel-S1
How do you ride the learner bike back to the training centre then once you've passed?
same way you would ride it anywhere@@petersylvester2905
I think you're wrong
I have learned from these videos and from US ones, not to make any jestures or lights or sounds if a driver does a close call on me or plays silly games cutting in. I just give the buxxer room. S/he might be unpredictably aggressive in return for my expression of annoyance.
#2 I'd be speeding to lessons too if I was charging £42 an hour
Either there's a disturbing increase in the number of Muppets who don't care about having crashes or there's a lot more criminals driving stolen vehicles.
But speeding on clear road is easier to fine you for than kamikaze driving.
It's not so much as more criminals stealing cars... it's more just a case that with the advent of more motorists using dash cams; more stolen cars are being captured in footage...!
Now the law has changed, unless you have a voice activated camera pressing save in illegal whilst in motion. I understand it if it is going to be used as evidence but if not re aware
Why do dashcam peeps seem intent on exposing their own poor driving?
It doesn't look like a country at war. 🤔
11# 6:05 Trucker in the wrong. Car moved to left lane to undertakes well before trucker moved into same lane.
Joking right?
@@charliejackman2953
Did you watch the clip, and if so do you know what to undertake is?
@@JohnFarrell-bc8gt See red car John, that is an undertake.
"Did you watch the clip"! what an absolute wanker
Just a heads up to the geezer on the push bike....
Most bikes have a quick release seat post. The seat and post make a pretty good club
Or a face full of water bottle water.
N0 5 dangerous and illegal overtake
0:16 What the heck is all this road obstruction ? Besides that, I must say the cammer kept a considerable gap between himself and the truck he should have foreseen that the opposing traffic would move threw the blockade and just slow down and accommodate. Poor discipline on the cammer's behalf.
3:31 Just your typical cyclist vs a typical moron. nothing new.
6:32 That is not a trick ! That's just bad driving.
#7 call someone a w a n k e r and one day you’ll get a thump