I really appreciate the focus on the importance of striking key squares rather than just attacking or defending pieces. This concept was new to me, especially since I couldn't see how it applies without knight jumps, checks, or pawn wins. Your explanation has helped me realize how crucial it is to keep a balanced approach in my games. I often find myself lost in trying to imagine all possible lines during a rapid game, which only leads to making poor tactical decisions. These insightful minutes have been incredibly valuable to me.. 😍
It was a nice game, and great coverage, thanks for sharing! I think controlling that square in particular has to do with the fact that to attack a pawn you should control the square in front of it, making the c-pawn a backwards pawn. Very good illustration on how to play against that, also notice that White traded a lot of pieces, which is good for that kind of positions.
It all makes sense in hindsight. What’s hard is to see the importance of that square early in the game as a hook to hang your entire strategy on! What were the factors that pointed to it being so important from early on? Thanks for a great video, by the way! Love your channel!
After black played bxc6 the c5-square became the main weakness of blacks position; since black had already pushed the d-pawn past that square and there's no b-pawn left to control it, so any piece you can land there will never get kicked away by a pawn. The only other squares with that kind of property at this point are a6, which is much less useful being on the rim of the board, and c6 which would also be nice to control but since your light squared bishop has a hard time reaching that it's easier to focus on c5 instead. A general takeaway is, you don't always have to make controlling such squares your entire game plan, but realizing when a square in the enemy camp can never be attacked by one of their pawns and using that for one of your minor pieces may give you a great advantage.
I can see the logic behind this but I am stuck at 1350 because to be honest I struggle with coming up with the "right" middle game plan. That's the hardest part of chess, untangling all of the complexities of middlegame positions and having the right balance of finding your opponent's weaknesses and not creating ones of your own. I quit chess for 18 years after age 20 when I got tired of playing it, and recently just started back a year and a half ago, and I feel like my lack of experience at the game hurts me in that regard, because there's some things you just have to "know" when you see certain patterns.
Once black creates the backward pawn on c6, one common plan is to control the square in front of the pawn so it can't push, and so you can blockade it. It's very hard to defend a blockaded pawn. So in general, when you see backward pawns you want to force your opponent to spend resources defending them, because it usually lands you in a better position. What you saw in the game is once the opponent spent every resource defending the c6 pawn, Rubeinstein went for a6 and that's how the c6 pawn was ultimately won, not always by piling up on it but forcing the opponent to spend every resource defending it.
The real reason is that the only weakness on WHITE’s structure is the diagonal. Best seen if you remove the white bishop from the board when it is still there. And the only square for black to control this diagonal is the one mentioned. Once you covered an attack from this diagonal you can proceed with your own attack
10:56 i thought of Qc2. And i'm not quite sure what the difference is to Qd4. They seem to both accomplish very similar things. They both keep everything defended and open up a lot of good squares for the queen. Qc2 opens up the whole diagonal for the queen for example. Also i though keeping the queen further back makes it less likely to get pushed around by the opponent compared to d4. The queen is also defended on c2 and is creating a battery with the rook with the immidiate threat to capture on c6. The only issue that is see is that the queen is temporarily taking away the square for the rook f2 Rook to double up, but other than then Qc2 strikes me as the more natural and solid move. I haven't put the position into the analysis yet, so all of this is only my own take on it. Edit: According to the engine Qc2 is only very lightly worse. Stockfish sais it's -0.2 compared to Qd2 and torch says -0.15. So it seems my analysis was mostly correct.
Im surprised I followed this game so clearly and predicted most of the moves. Your content has made a huge difference in my play, my puzzle rating shot up first (2150) and rapid is slowly catching up.
Great explanation. I have a question though. While the C5 clearly super critical in this game, does this principle apply to every single game? Or is it important because of the conditions of this game? Thank you Nelson for the great content as always.
Nelson my question is the c5 square important because that’s where the attack took place due to the advantage of whites piece placement. And lack of blacks ability to defend the square in that particular opening? Or is that square always important in all opening? Thank you for your time.
!!!! My question as well. Is c5 always (usually?) as important as we see in this game or are there other squares that take on disproportionate importance with different openings? Love the lesson Nelson!
He's mentioned before that c5 is especially important in d4 openings. I don't think it's always a critical square. For d4 openings, it's important because it's a natural pawn break to strike at whites center, and claim space in the center.
1650 Elo here -- I'm still note quite sure how you "choose" to go after the c5 square. I can see in retrospect how it became super important, but I don't see how I'd think to establish a plan to go after c5. Was this something white knew he was going to do from the beginning? Or is it something that just became more important as the position unfolded? If it's the former, how would one know to choose c5 as opposed to trying to gain control of another square instead? Basically, how would one decide to even choose this plan in the first place?
I think Rubenstein knew that the backward pawn on c6 would become a liability, so taking advantage of that by blockading the pawn and restricting black's options
We're constantly looking out for attacks on pieces/pawns. So is it hard to see that white is attacking "just" a square? Did black know what was going on in this game? And are there moves that show that he knew? Another question: You said that moving the f-pawn in front of the king isn't a problem, because the bishop controls the diagonal. Why put the bishop on c5 and then trade it off. Wouldn't it be better to put the knight on c5?
Hey Nelson, taking your course currently going through middle game just wondering if you could do a video on your channel for common ways, positions or lines for setting up discovery moves or checks? Might be very informative to have some examples from you as I find these harder to see from others but very effective when I use them but I would like to train my eye/vision further on this very useful tool thanks very much in advance if you decide to.
@5:40 but how could we identify in advance that the C5 square will be important? Is it a consequence of the opening, of some board state like the difference in development, or the pawn structure or what? I feel like I have 0 shot of looking at a board and thinking "yeah, I need to control square X"
It was a backwards pawn, and the pawn on the B file was gone. Therefore, black had no way to defend that square with another pawn. Black's only solution would've been to push the C pawn to make sure that there's no weakness caused by the pawn structure. However, as you saw in the game, white controlled the weakness caused by the backwards pawn
@@tldreview not nearly as much if it remained on c6, for the simple fact that from c5 it can actually move forward, or let the d pawn move forward while supporting it, something that couldn't possibly happen from c6. In short, these pawns do nothing and your job is to make sure they keep doing nothing. The c and d pawn could steamroll your pieces if left unattended, with c5 d4 c4 and so on.
15:01, once black rook attacked queen, coudn't the white rook take the black pawn winning an extra pawn? If rook takes queen then rook also takes queen but by this move you win an extra pawn and establish two connected pass pawns.
The sole reason why I like to play the Caro-Kann: Advance Botvinnik Defense as black is because you can get down to the c5 square fight on move 3, and you get to fight on your own terms.
I just played a game in which I wanted to focus on the C5 square but my opponent kept coming at me on the other side of the board. In my mind I just F5 and it seemed like I ended up having the same advantages in your video. Is there any way that works also?
In every chess game there will be certain squares more important than others. While playing it might not be obvious that a battle over a certain square is taking place, but in hindsight its very clear. In this particular case it seems to be the c5 square.
Even though i didnt understand the significance of that square but it did give me a plan to pick any square on the board and position all the pieces around that sqaure and hopefully some good advandage will occur due to it.
I believe Nelson mentioned that white has greater space because of controlling that square c5. At 12:54 he made us realise that black doesn't have any candidate moves to stop c6 pawn. PS: As soon as bxc6 happened, d5 become unisolated but c6 becamed a backward pawn (positionally weak). If white allowed c5, the pawns would be connected (positionally strong pawn). I am assuming that this is the reason why white needed to control that c5 square.
I think what misses here is an explanation of why pushing the C-pawn would cause white problems. As a beginner that's what confuses me - how he even understood that early in the game that he needs to prevent that push. For me the only explanation that I really understood from this video is that black would be tied up defending the weak c6 pawn and be cramped because of it which will give white an advantage. But still, how you can know that early in the game that black would be defending it at all costs and not just trade it to some underdefended pawn of white or come up with some tactics to make c-pawn push possible? You just can't be sure unless you just calculate all the possible moves of black for 10 moves ahead.
Seconding this. Playing positionally requires the skill of identifying the key squares in a position, but I'm not sure what principles to use to figure it out. (Book recommendations welcome too!)
It is less about the square, and more about the pawns. White originally was attacking the isolated d pawn. Once the pawn on c6 moved over in the trade, the d pawn was no longer isolated, but this new c pawn is (backwards aka isolated, as in it has no pawns behind it on neighboring files to defend). The c5 square exploits this by blockading the pawn on c6, so blacks pawns are essentially frozen together here. Only blacks pieces can defend the c5 square, so white is able to manipulate all exchanges in their favor without having to worry about losing pieces to pawns-because c6 is isolated!
15:00--Ra8 doesn't really save the pawn because white can play Rxa6. The best black can do is a big trade where white has an extra (passed) pawn in a same-colored bishop endgame.
Chess is an abstract strategy game that involves no hidden information and no elements of chance. It is played on a chessboard with 64 squares arranged in an 8×8 grid. The players, referred to as "White" and "Black", each control sixteen pieces: one king, one queen, two rooks, two bishops, two knights, and eight pawns. White moves first, followed by Black. The game is won by checkmating the opponent's king, i.e. threatening it with inescapable capture. There are several ways a game can end in a draw. The recorded history of chess goes back at least to the emergence of a similar game, chaturanga, in seventh-century India. After its introduction in Persia, it spread to the Arab world and then to Europe. The rules of chess as they are known today emerged in Europe at the end of the 15th century, with standardization and universal acceptance by the end of the 19th century. Today, chess is one of the world's most popular games and is played by millions of people worldwide. Organized chess arose in the 19th century. Chess competition today is governed internationally by FIDE (Fédération Internationale des Échecs; the International Chess Federation). The first universally recognized World Chess Champion, Wilhelm Steinitz, claimed his title in 1886; Ding Liren is the current World Champion. A huge body of chess theory has developed since the game's inception. Aspects of art are found in chess composition, and chess in its turn influenced Western culture and the arts, and has connections with other fields such as mathematics, computer science, and psychology. One of the goals of early computer scientists was to create a chess-playing machine. In 1997, Deep Blue became the first computer to beat the reigning World Champion in a match when it defeated Garry Kasparov. Today's chess engines are significantly stronger than the best human players and have deeply influenced the development of chess theory; however, chess is not a solved game.
Maybe no crucial mistakes. Maybe black played a decent game but white slowly took advantage of sight weaknesses and added them up over t8me to have a winning position. Or, maybe black should not have made a play to end with an isolated pawn. Then again, I’m sure it was a calculated risk. There is so much judgement involved. Nelson often says things like, “there are two or three good moves, I need to pick the one that is slightly better”. A bishop for a knight? Maybe, if I get positional advantage and it works with my attack or defence. And maybe I like my knights more than my bishops compared to other players.
9:40 Any tips on why Bc5 rather than Nc5? Whenever I get into this type of position where a blockade is planned I invariably (perhaps 80/20) seem to choose the worst option (at least per Stockfish) when it is positional rather than some more obvious tactic - sometimes a minor issue but sometimes losing a winning advantage. If I cannot see clearly I would tend to choose the N on the basis of the adage that a N is a good blockade piece. Sometimes I might choose B on the basis that when the dust settles I would rather have the N there if black exchanges - but that still falls into the 80% wrong !
Hey! Why not taking the same idea and make some change? The forbidden square: Every move, one square become ''red'' at random, so it kill the piece on it. Rule: 1) The king can't be kill with ''red square'' so it does nothing. 2) If a ''red square'' is chosen and the king is on it, add +1 red square for every move. So instead of 1 ''red square'' by move, its 2 and so. :)
![ILLSLICK - KILLSHOT REMIX [FULL VERSION]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RIK8RrqIAzE/mqdefault.jpg)
I really appreciate the focus on the importance of striking key squares rather than just attacking or defending pieces. This concept was new to me, especially since I couldn't see how it applies without knight jumps, checks, or pawn wins. Your explanation has helped me realize how crucial it is to keep a balanced approach in my games. I often find myself lost in trying to imagine all possible lines during a rapid game, which only leads to making poor tactical decisions. These insightful minutes have been incredibly valuable to me.. 😍
this is why im loving Logical Chess series! great episode, Nelson!
At 18:08 you could also go Rc8, if QxR pxQ, Bxc8 and Qd8+ picks up the bishop. If 1. BxR then just promote to a queen
It was a nice game, and great coverage, thanks for sharing! I think controlling that square in particular has to do with the fact that to attack a pawn you should control the square in front of it, making the c-pawn a backwards pawn. Very good illustration on how to play against that, also notice that White traded a lot of pieces, which is good for that kind of positions.
It all makes sense in hindsight. What’s hard is to see the importance of that square early in the game as a hook to hang your entire strategy on! What were the factors that pointed to it being so important from early on? Thanks for a great video, by the way! Love your channel!
Maybe I can say, it didn't give black chance to invade white territory 😅😅😅
I had the same question. Maybe because it's preventing the backward pawn from advancing?
My question exactly.
After black played bxc6 the c5-square became the main weakness of blacks position; since black had already pushed the d-pawn past that square and there's no b-pawn left to control it, so any piece you can land there will never get kicked away by a pawn. The only other squares with that kind of property at this point are a6, which is much less useful being on the rim of the board, and c6 which would also be nice to control but since your light squared bishop has a hard time reaching that it's easier to focus on c5 instead.
A general takeaway is, you don't always have to make controlling such squares your entire game plan, but realizing when a square in the enemy camp can never be attacked by one of their pawns and using that for one of your minor pieces may give you a great advantage.
I can see the logic behind this but I am stuck at 1350 because to be honest I struggle with coming up with the "right" middle game plan. That's the hardest part of chess, untangling all of the complexities of middlegame positions and having the right balance of finding your opponent's weaknesses and not creating ones of your own. I quit chess for 18 years after age 20 when I got tired of playing it, and recently just started back a year and a half ago, and I feel like my lack of experience at the game hurts me in that regard, because there's some things you just have to "know" when you see certain patterns.
You dont really explain how they knew to go for C5 though. Did they just pick a rando square and focus on it? Why that square?
No pawn in B or D file to defend that square, a weakness created by black's moves after Tarrasch defense opening
It's like midfield in soccer. Control over midfield means control of the game.
Most invasions occur via queenside for one and 5 is a central row. Just my thoughts.
Once black creates the backward pawn on c6, one common plan is to control the square in front of the pawn so it can't push, and so you can blockade it. It's very hard to defend a blockaded pawn. So in general, when you see backward pawns you want to force your opponent to spend resources defending them, because it usually lands you in a better position. What you saw in the game is once the opponent spent every resource defending the c6 pawn, Rubeinstein went for a6 and that's how the c6 pawn was ultimately won, not always by piling up on it but forcing the opponent to spend every resource defending it.
The real reason is that the only weakness on WHITE’s structure is the diagonal. Best seen if you remove the white bishop from the board when it is still there. And the only square for black to control this diagonal is the one mentioned. Once you covered an attack from this diagonal you can proceed with your own attack
10:56 i thought of Qc2. And i'm not quite sure what the difference is to Qd4. They seem to both accomplish very similar things. They both keep everything defended and open up a lot of good squares for the queen. Qc2 opens up the whole diagonal for the queen for example. Also i though keeping the queen further back makes it less likely to get pushed around by the opponent compared to d4. The queen is also defended on c2 and is creating a battery with the rook with the immidiate threat to capture on c6.
The only issue that is see is that the queen is temporarily taking away the square for the rook f2 Rook to double up, but other than then Qc2 strikes me as the more natural and solid move. I haven't put the position into the analysis yet, so all of this is only my own take on it.
Edit: According to the engine Qc2 is only very lightly worse. Stockfish sais it's -0.2 compared to Qd2 and torch says -0.15. So it seems my analysis was mostly correct.
Yeah but haven't we made the whole game about the C5 square?
13:40 spoken like a true member of society
💀
Deaf people: 😄
Blind people: ☠💀⚰
also why does he sound uncannily like lightning mcqueen
Lmfao bro
Im surprised I followed this game so clearly and predicted most of the moves. Your content has made a huge difference in my play, my puzzle rating shot up first (2150) and rapid is slowly catching up.
Do this series for more books like this
Dear Sir...am greatly enjoying this logcal chess series...keep up the good work...eagerly waiting for the next game in the logical series...thanks
Great explanation. I have a question though. While the C5 clearly super critical in this game, does this principle apply to every single game? Or is it important because of the conditions of this game? Thank you Nelson for the great content as always.
Nelson my question is the c5 square important because that’s where the attack took place due to the advantage of whites piece placement. And lack of blacks ability to defend the square in that particular opening?
Or is that square always important in all opening?
Thank you for your time.
!!!! My question as well. Is c5 always (usually?) as important as we see in this game or are there other squares that take on disproportionate importance with different openings? Love the lesson Nelson!
Also my question. Thankls.
He's mentioned before that c5 is especially important in d4 openings. I don't think it's always a critical square.
For d4 openings, it's important because it's a natural pawn break to strike at whites center, and claim space in the center.
It became a weakness to exploit in this particular game due to the b and d pawns not being able to defend it
Amazing recap amd a beautiful strategy. I learned a lot from this game
1650 Elo here -- I'm still note quite sure how you "choose" to go after the c5 square. I can see in retrospect how it became super important, but I don't see how I'd think to establish a plan to go after c5. Was this something white knew he was going to do from the beginning? Or is it something that just became more important as the position unfolded? If it's the former, how would one know to choose c5 as opposed to trying to gain control of another square instead? Basically, how would one decide to even choose this plan in the first place?
Was also wondering the same thing
Perhaps it's something you notice about a set of positions that derive from an opening
C5 is on Black's half of the board, close to the centre, and directly in front of the backward pawn on c6.
I think Rubenstein knew that the backward pawn on c6 would become a liability, so taking advantage of that by blockading the pawn and restricting black's options
I still don’t understand why the game was focused on the C5 square. Why couldn’t black move the focus of the game somewhere else?
We're constantly looking out for attacks on pieces/pawns. So is it hard to see that white is attacking "just" a square? Did black know what was going on in this game? And are there moves that show that he knew?
Another question: You said that moving the f-pawn in front of the king isn't a problem, because the bishop controls the diagonal. Why put the bishop on c5 and then trade it off. Wouldn't it be better to put the knight on c5?
Hey Nelson, taking your course currently going through middle game just wondering if you could do a video on your channel for common ways, positions or lines for setting up discovery moves or checks? Might be very informative to have some examples from you as I find these harder to see from others but very effective when I use them but I would like to train my eye/vision further on this very useful tool thanks very much in advance if you decide to.
Best chess channel on TH-cam.
@5:40 but how could we identify in advance that the C5 square will be important? Is it a consequence of the opening, of some board state like the difference in development, or the pawn structure or what?
I feel like I have 0 shot of looking at a board and thinking "yeah, I need to control square X"
It was a backwards pawn, and the pawn on the B file was gone. Therefore, black had no way to defend that square with another pawn. Black's only solution would've been to push the C pawn to make sure that there's no weakness caused by the pawn structure. However, as you saw in the game, white controlled the weakness caused by the backwards pawn
@@W1ndyyyyyyyy even if black had managed to push the pawn, isn't the pawn on C5 itself a weakness?
@@tldreview not nearly as much if it remained on c6, for the simple fact that from c5 it can actually move forward, or let the d pawn move forward while supporting it, something that couldn't possibly happen from c6.
In short, these pawns do nothing and your job is to make sure they keep doing nothing. The c and d pawn could steamroll your pieces if left unattended, with c5 d4 c4 and so on.
15:01, once black rook attacked queen, coudn't the white rook take the black pawn winning an extra pawn? If rook takes queen then rook also takes queen but by this move you win an extra pawn and establish two connected pass pawns.
Great vid as usual Nelson. Good stuff
this game was a masterpiece, so interesting!
The sole reason why I like to play the Caro-Kann: Advance Botvinnik Defense as black is because you can get down to the c5 square fight on move 3, and you get to fight on your own terms.
Another great video, thanks! Hope your voice gets better soon 👍
I just played a game in which I wanted to focus on the C5 square but my opponent kept coming at me on the other side of the board. In my mind I just F5 and it seemed like I ended up having the same advantages in your video. Is there any way that works also?
Hello . Is this only a super important square for white, or for black too?
Good question!
In every chess game there will be certain squares more important than others.
While playing it might not be obvious that a battle over a certain square is taking place, but in hindsight its very clear.
In this particular case it seems to be the c5 square.
It had to do with black having an isolated pawn, I believe.
Crazy how much that position is key
Even though i didnt understand the significance of that square but it did give me a plan to pick any square on the board and position all the pieces around that sqaure and hopefully some good advandage will occur due to it.
I believe Nelson mentioned that white has greater space because of controlling that square c5. At 12:54 he made us realise that black doesn't have any candidate moves to stop c6 pawn. PS: As soon as bxc6 happened, d5 become unisolated but c6 becamed a backward pawn (positionally weak). If white allowed c5, the pawns would be connected (positionally strong pawn). I am assuming that this is the reason why white needed to control that c5 square.
15:03 Why not Rxa6, counterattacking black's queen? That would win us another pawn in the end and we are left with two connected passed pawns.
16:55 Qc7 is a forced queen trade
Wish you came with the book Nelson ! .. Just open the book and get the lesson. GREAT BOOK to own
This book club chess series is like a weekly Master Class.
I think what misses here is an explanation of why pushing the C-pawn would cause white problems. As a beginner that's what confuses me - how he even understood that early in the game that he needs to prevent that push. For me the only explanation that I really understood from this video is that black would be tied up defending the weak c6 pawn and be cramped because of it which will give white an advantage. But still, how you can know that early in the game that black would be defending it at all costs and not just trade it to some underdefended pawn of white or come up with some tactics to make c-pawn push possible? You just can't be sure unless you just calculate all the possible moves of black for 10 moves ahead.
Yes in the end it was shown that it was the best, but how do you even see that so soon in the game
How do you decide the square to focus on?
Seconding this. Playing positionally requires the skill of identifying the key squares in a position, but I'm not sure what principles to use to figure it out. (Book recommendations welcome too!)
There was an isolated pawn, I think. So white chose c5 for positional advantage maybe.
c5 square is the furthest forward outpost that can't ever be attacked by a pawn (besides a5, which is less important)
It is less about the square, and more about the pawns. White originally was attacking the isolated d pawn. Once the pawn on c6 moved over in the trade, the d pawn was no longer isolated, but this new c pawn is (backwards aka isolated, as in it has no pawns behind it on neighboring files to defend). The c5 square exploits this by blockading the pawn on c6, so blacks pawns are essentially frozen together here. Only blacks pieces can defend the c5 square, so white is able to manipulate all exchanges in their favor without having to worry about losing pieces to pawns-because c6 is isolated!
18:23 What's wrong about Rb5, attacking the queen, while being defended by the queen?
A game that is simply a Master Class
And he sacrifices THE ROOOK😅
Well done dude 😎👍🏿❤🎉
Do you have a logical chess playlist?
It would be nice if you could make one.
Yeah just look at his playlist.
@@Llama_vet I have looked in his playlists and there is not one called "Logical Chess".
At 16:05 what about rook C8? Does it just lose to Bishop takes a6?
"Because a Little Bug went Ka-CHOO!"
12:03 white square black bishop is trapped by white pawn to f5
in the "post-mortem" scenarios I kept thinking Rc8 to follow with b8Q. Is that bad?
15:00--Ra8 doesn't really save the pawn because white can play Rxa6. The best black can do is a big trade where white has an extra (passed) pawn in a same-colored bishop endgame.
You just blundered a rook!
@@sh0kerexplain how that blunders a rook?
@@Promptshot Qxa6
@@KhangTheSupremeRuler just recapture with the queen?!?!?
@@sh0ker Um, no? Stockfish agrees with me, by the way. Rxa6 is the best move here.
This is chess teaching at its best
Dammit, TH-cam, gimme a double-like button just for this channel!
Cool game.👏🏻👍🏻
Chess is an abstract strategy game that involves no hidden information and no elements of chance. It is played on a chessboard with 64 squares arranged in an 8×8 grid. The players, referred to as "White" and "Black", each control sixteen pieces: one king, one queen, two rooks, two bishops, two knights, and eight pawns. White moves first, followed by Black. The game is won by checkmating the opponent's king, i.e. threatening it with inescapable capture. There are several ways a game can end in a draw.
The recorded history of chess goes back at least to the emergence of a similar game, chaturanga, in seventh-century India. After its introduction in Persia, it spread to the Arab world and then to Europe. The rules of chess as they are known today emerged in Europe at the end of the 15th century, with standardization and universal acceptance by the end of the 19th century. Today, chess is one of the world's most popular games and is played by millions of people worldwide.
Organized chess arose in the 19th century. Chess competition today is governed internationally by FIDE (Fédération Internationale des Échecs; the International Chess Federation). The first universally recognized World Chess Champion, Wilhelm Steinitz, claimed his title in 1886; Ding Liren is the current World Champion.
A huge body of chess theory has developed since the game's inception. Aspects of art are found in chess composition, and chess in its turn influenced Western culture and the arts, and has connections with other fields such as mathematics, computer science, and psychology. One of the goals of early computer scientists was to create a chess-playing machine. In 1997, Deep Blue became the first computer to beat the reigning World Champion in a match when it defeated Garry Kasparov. Today's chess engines are significantly stronger than the best human players and have deeply influenced the development of chess theory; however, chess is not a solved game.
I thought the center was the most important square 🤯.
Indeed
Hi, will you plz do a same series about the book ^the art of attack in chess^ by Vladimir Vukovic
00:34 😂😂😂
Why was it in Black's interest to fight a battle on the queen side, especially after both kings castled?
nelson why didint white play bb5 instead of b4 pls say
At timestamp 14:30 , why not Pc5 instead of Re7?? NxP NxN RxP cuts the losses to only a Pawn.
Please make playlist of 'Logical Chess' episodes.
There already is one
Geampleigh!!
Hi from Singapore
10:33 Rc2 is blocking the protection of the Queen to the Knight and the Knight might be saved to c3 but blocking the Rooks in the future.🤡💀
Nelson is like a sandwich if you think about it. Both have amazing content.
That's a classic game
What was black's crucial mistake?
Maybe no crucial mistakes. Maybe black played a decent game but white slowly took advantage of sight weaknesses and added them up over t8me to have a winning position. Or, maybe black should not have made a play to end with an isolated pawn. Then again, I’m sure it was a calculated risk. There is so much judgement involved. Nelson often says things like, “there are two or three good moves, I need to pick the one that is slightly better”. A bishop for a knight? Maybe, if I get positional advantage and it works with my attack or defence. And maybe I like my knights more than my bishops compared to other players.
How did white determine so early in the game to control C5, and commit all those pieces to it?
How to defend against the Grand Prix attack.
I always thought that c4 was more powerful
"They say all squares are played equal, but you see me opening and you see Samoa Joe opening, and you can see this statement is not true!"
Nice C5 square! LoL from Madras city India (Carlson won in our city ...)
9:40 Any tips on why Bc5 rather than Nc5? Whenever I get into this type of position where a blockade is planned I invariably (perhaps 80/20) seem to choose the worst option (at least per Stockfish) when it is positional rather than some more obvious tactic - sometimes a minor issue but sometimes losing a winning advantage. If I cannot see clearly I would tend to choose the N on the basis of the adage that a N is a good blockade piece. Sometimes I might choose B on the basis that when the dust settles I would rather have the N there if black exchanges - but that still falls into the 80% wrong !
Engine actually prefers nc5. Pretty sure the thinking would be that you don't eant black to just trade their bishop for your strong blockading knight.
The obvious reason would be that Nc5 loses the b pawn. But there are things more important than a pawn though.......
nice
can't believe it's not f7 or f2
Guys there is oil on that square
never play f3
🎉
Hi Nelson bro
First To , Hello from Zambia
1st cmnt from India
Hey man. I love your videos but the ads are killing me. Too many ads can take away from good content
Get the TH-cam premium. It's worth it.
@@jayhalliburton7659 I had it a while back. It's definitely a good deal.
Get premium bro
Hey! Why not taking the same idea and make some change?
The forbidden square:
Every move, one square become ''red'' at random, so it kill the piece on it.
Rule:
1) The king can't be kill with ''red square'' so it does nothing.
2) If a ''red square'' is chosen and the king is on it, add +1 red square for every move. So instead of 1 ''red square'' by move, its 2 and so.
:)
Obligatory TH-cam algorithm comment
..
Obligatory TH-cam algorithm reply
I second that.
Let's argue about religion or politics to really get the comment section going
@@maximos905 Story of adam and eve is fake first human made in africa congo 😂😂😂😂
Spam replies on this comment
I breathe
I live
I eat
Another plan in my ever growing Queen's Pawn and Caro Kann! Let's goo!