Thank you for sharing your perspective Virtual pre-amps and floating 64-bit processing have indeed revolutionized how audio is created and mixed, offering impressive flexibility and precision. However, hardware tools still hold their ground for many professionals due to their unique sonic characteristics, tactile control, and reliability in critical environments. Each approach has its strengths, and choosing between hardware and virtual setups often depends on the specific needs of the project and the creator's workflow preferences. It's an exciting time to explore the best of both worlds.
Thanks for the feedback I appreciate you taking the time to share your thoughts. I’ll definitely consider adjusting the background music in future videos to make sure it enhances rather than distracts. Your input helps me make the content better for everyone
Thank you for your comment and your interest! I appreciate your note on the newer generation, and I understand the desire to stay up-to-date. While the version I covered may be a bit older, it’s still a valuable option for many right now, especially for those on a budget. I’ll make sure to cover the new generation in an upcoming video! 😊
There are some very good interfaces these days. It would be good for you to test them and provide numbers, like Julian Krause. Or spend 30 days with each one and have the pros/cons. Otherwise, this comes off as participation trophies for everyone.
I really appreciate your suggestion, and I completely understand the value added by detailed testing and data-driven comparisons, like what Julian Krause offers. It’s a great idea, and I’ll work on making my content more comprehensive, including deeper reviews of the pros and cons after extended use. Thank you for your valuable feedback it helps me improve the quality of my videos.
Thank you for your comment There’s no doubt that RME is one of the top brands in the audio interface market, especially when it comes to sound quality and performance stability. That said, the variety of options available allows users to choose based on their needs and budget. If you’ve used RME before, I’d love to hear about your experience and share its advantages with the rest of the followers.
@@THEFANTASTIC5LISTCHANNEL RME have.. and are still supporting and providing drivers for equipment they made almost 30 years ago. That, IMO is incredible, given the changes in tech between PCI, PCIe, USB, Thunderbolt and it’s variants, USB2, 3 and C… they just keep going. Most other similar companies, either, no longer exist, or have completely forgotten about their great hardware of the time and move online nothing happened… I know who I’m sticking with for quality and reliability.
@@mattrixx_audio Thank you for your great comment There's no doubt that RME stands out for its incredible commitment to supporting its devices over the decades, which is rare in such a rapidly changing market. Their consistency in providing updates and drivers for older equipment reflects their dedication to quality and reliability, making them a strong choice for professionals. It's great to see how users value this strategy, and I completely agree that this kind of support builds long-term loyalty.
Thank you for your comment! The SSL 2 MKII is indeed a strong contender, especially with its support for 32-bit fixed point technology, which offers a wide dynamic range and minimizes signal distortion. As for Julian Krause’s reviews, they are an excellent source of scientific and detailed analysis, and I appreciate you mentioning them. I’ll strive to cover more technical aspects in the future, including reviews of technologies like 32-bit fixed point and their applications in various use cases. Your feedback is valuable, and I’ll work on improving the content to deliver the best for everyone
I really appreciate your input on Presonus's Quantum ES and HD! I’ll definitely keep that in mind for future reviews. My goal is always to expand the options I cover and provide comprehensive insights to help everyone choose what works best for them. Thank you so much for your valuable contribution
With floating 64-bit processing none of these hardware tools are necessary. Just use a virtual pre-amp.
Thank you for sharing your perspective Virtual pre-amps and floating 64-bit processing have indeed revolutionized how audio is created and mixed, offering impressive flexibility and precision. However, hardware tools still hold their ground for many professionals due to their unique sonic characteristics, tactile control, and reliability in critical environments. Each approach has its strengths, and choosing between hardware and virtual setups often depends on the specific needs of the project and the creator's workflow preferences. It's an exciting time to explore the best of both worlds.
This would be vastly improved without the background music.
Thanks for the feedback I appreciate you taking the time to share your thoughts. I’ll definitely consider adjusting the background music in future videos to make sure it enhances rather than distracts. Your input helps me make the content better for everyone
Dude... 2i2 3rd Gen ? This one is outdated for a few months now !
Thank you for your comment and your interest! I appreciate your note on the newer generation, and I understand the desire to stay up-to-date. While the version I covered may be a bit older, it’s still a valuable option for many right now, especially for those on a budget. I’ll make sure to cover the new generation in an upcoming video! 😊
There are some very good interfaces these days. It would be good for you to test them and provide numbers, like Julian Krause. Or spend 30 days with each one and have the pros/cons. Otherwise, this comes off as participation trophies for everyone.
I really appreciate your suggestion, and I completely understand the value added by detailed testing and data-driven comparisons, like what Julian Krause offers. It’s a great idea, and I’ll work on making my content more comprehensive, including deeper reviews of the pros and cons after extended use. Thank you for your valuable feedback it helps me improve the quality of my videos.
RME all the way
Thank you for your comment There’s no doubt that RME is one of the top brands in the audio interface market, especially when it comes to sound quality and performance stability. That said, the variety of options available allows users to choose based on their needs and budget. If you’ve used RME before, I’d love to hear about your experience and share its advantages with the rest of the followers.
@@THEFANTASTIC5LISTCHANNEL RME have.. and are still supporting and providing drivers for equipment they made almost 30 years ago.
That, IMO is incredible, given the changes in tech between PCI, PCIe, USB, Thunderbolt and it’s variants, USB2, 3 and C… they just keep going.
Most other similar companies, either, no longer exist, or have completely forgotten about their great hardware of the time and move online nothing happened…
I know who I’m sticking with for quality and reliability.
@@mattrixx_audio Thank you for your great comment There's no doubt that RME stands out for its incredible commitment to supporting its devices over the decades, which is rare in such a rapidly changing market. Their consistency in providing updates and drivers for older equipment reflects their dedication to quality and reliability, making them a strong choice for professionals. It's great to see how users value this strategy, and I completely agree that this kind of support builds long-term loyalty.
SSL 2 MKII, 32-bit fixed point (integer), check the review by Julian Krause..
Thank you for your comment! The SSL 2 MKII is indeed a strong contender, especially with its support for 32-bit fixed point technology, which offers a wide dynamic range and minimizes signal distortion. As for Julian Krause’s reviews, they are an excellent source of scientific and detailed analysis, and I appreciate you mentioning them. I’ll strive to cover more technical aspects in the future, including reviews of technologies like 32-bit fixed point and their applications in various use cases. Your feedback is valuable, and I’ll work on improving the content to deliver the best for everyone
Presonus's Quantum ES and HD are as good as any of these
I really appreciate your input on Presonus's Quantum ES and HD! I’ll definitely keep that in mind for future reviews. My goal is always to expand the options I cover and provide comprehensive insights to help everyone choose what works best for them. Thank you so much for your valuable contribution