The Sony Lens We've Been WAITING For!!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ต.ค. 2024
- This video is brought to you by SQUARESPACE! Visit www.squarespace... to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain.
Click Here for More Info!
16-55mm f/2.8 G Lens (Oct 11, 2019)
Amazon geni.us/UuV1Q4W | BH bhpho.to/30GpYwx
Sony a6600 Body Only (Nov 2019):
Amazon geni.us/5UZ5CAN | BH bhpho.to/30HT3I7
Sony a6100 Entry Level APS-C:
Amazon geni.us/WhcOi | BH bhpho.to/30Gq7jz
My FAVORITE Camera Gear Kit!: geni.us/2sn6B
Follow Us on IG! @jasonvmedia & @hellovivienne
Music from Epidemic Sound (Free 30-Day Trial!) share.epidemics...
The Sony 16-55mm f/2.8 Lens for APS-C is finally coming! The question is... Were you waiting for this lens?! If so... what the heck took so long? 🤷
16-55mm f/2.8 G Lens (Oct 11, 2019)
Amazon geni.us/UuV1Q4W | BH bhpho.to/30GpYwx
Sony a6600 Body Only (Nov 2019):
Amazon geni.us/5UZ5CAN | BH bhpho.to/30HT3I7
Sony a6100 Entry Level APS-C:
Amazon geni.us/WhcOi | BH bhpho.to/30Gq7jz
Should I get this lens for my new a7 iii
Cause it’s light Weight for my gimbal
And it’s f2.8 ??????
I waited but didn't enlist for that price.
I wonder why the price is so high. I hope it is tariff. If we assume there's 20% extra then the real price is around $1166. Then wait for usual sony discount, maybe I can snag it at around 900
A6600=A6300=A6500=Rolling shutter
yea same sitution. Waiting for 4k 60 or bust.
16-55mm for $1400.. hmmm. Sony isn’t keeping APSC alive.. Sigma is.
I am hoping Sigma is gonna continue making APSC lenses. Their trio of 1.4 primes are excellent!
What lens would you recommend instead of 16-55mm sony?
I am not sure how Sigma is keeping the Sony APS-C alive since they only have 12 APS-C e-mount lens, 19 if you count the e-mount full frame. Where Sony has also 19 APS-C e-mount and if you count the full frame e-mount you can double that number. That said, I think I would agree Sony adds a lot of little features most will not use that jack the price up. Sigma is for sure a good alternative to Sony. Tamron has a APS-C 17-28mm F/2.8 for $879, that gives you an extra $520 for a good prime. ;-) But it is nice that the Sony has such a wide focal range with the constant F/2.8 for a pretty good all purpose travel lens. That seems like a fair value.
you can buy superb 18-35 + 50-100 f1,8 for this price :D and get true 2,8 on APS-C
@@realgrapedrop lets put it this way... if the sigma 1.4 trio didn't exist, theres no reason anybody should pick Sony apsc over Fuji apsc....
The tariffs effectively make it more expensive for US companies to import certain goods (in this case, electronics) from China. That increased cost is eventually passed down to the US consumer since companies will not let their baselines / profits be impacted.
The annoying part is it affects the prices in the rest of the world as well
@@willj476 The more annoying part is that China effectively rips off everything we design and attempt to make with a Chinese Manufacturer. If the tariffs are a temporary but necessary evil to work towards keeping our designs more confidential then I think everyone wins in the end.
Just bought it 👌 Love it so far. Performs like a prime with a very useful zoom range. Amazed by its sharpness actually. Right up there with my sigma 16mm f1.4.
I guess what brings the value is the wider range at a constant F2.8. I think this would make a great all purpose travel lens. For a travel camera and the person who is just an avid photographer I think ASP-C is great. Packing small is always better over lugging bags of equipment.
Finally, someone with some common sense.
@@nightryder21 And a lot of cash to burn.
Hi Jason. Love your videos. I wasn't that in love with my Zeiss F4 and didn't use it at all. I found myself using my 35mm 1.8 lens because of the aperture. Literally couldn't sleep because of it. So I went back to the store today and luckily was able to exchange my Zeiss for this G lens (with additional money spent of course). It is a big canon, but I'm in love with it already!! Keep up the good work man. Greets from the Netherlands
A Sony a7iii + Tamron 28-75 costs the same as an a6600 + 16-55 G lens. Plus the Full frame ecosystem is better IMO. 2 card slots, battery grip. So much more options on the full frame side
I have a a6600 and a A7RIV, i have this lens, and im in the return window. Should i bring the 16-55 back and get the hold on..... 24 GM? An answer is very appreciated Jason, thanks!
i've been Waiting for the lens but not the price
kareem walid And no OSS for such a price
@ Sigma who is keeping the aps-c alive
Yes and it's a shame on behalf of Sony applying this salt to the burn for APS-C users.
I have an A6400 and an A6500. I was hoping for a really top-line upgrade for the A6500 but, the A6600 isn't it. I decided to get the A7iii and a Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 lens instead of the A6600 with the 16-55mm f/2.8...
I carry my A6500 and a 12mm Rokinon in tandem with the A7iii + Tamron if I need a wider view. I have pre-ordered the 70-350mm f/4.5-6.3 for use on my A6400 when I need a longer reach.
I can also carry a combination of A6400 and A6500 with a couple of primes and the 70-350mm lens for a very lightweight but, comprehensive kit.
I'm happy with my Sigma 16mm f/1.4, Sigma 30mm f/1.4, and SEL50F18.
Those are hard to beat.
No OSS, too expensive. I will keep the 16-70 Zeiss
I agree, the 16-70 Zeiss is an amazing lens! Although the recently released Tamron 17-70mm is a worthy challenger to it, it still holds its own against this overpriced Sony 16-55mm.
For e-mount no, but the 16-50mm f2.8 SSM for A-mount was the a77 kit lens and it was outstanding!!!
For me since i primarily am a musik producer, the production of a making of and possible the video of the first single is kind of expected of most indie labels. And then i have to film a whole band i like to get some different flavors, that goes for Cameras and kenses too, thats why i have the Sony A 6600, the A 7 C, the Lumix S 5 and yes the Canon R 5 bc the natural colors you get with this camera are just mindblowing and sets it apart from the more steril A 7 S III. Of course you could argue while blending the fottage with the recorded video i could color grade the A 7 S III to look like the Canon, but i honestly don’t have the time for unnecessary color grading then i am pushing already nost days a 16 hour work day, and thats why i try to cut as much as unnecessary work from my daily schedule. And yes the A 6600 paired with the 16/55 G master lens is simply killer, i truly love the combo of both of them
Finally upgraded my a6000 to the a6600. So happy 🤪. Now I need this new 16-55G. Will likely sell my 18-105 f4 and my 16-70 f4. Thanks for the great review. Peace ✌️
I will stick to my 10-18 and 18-105, glorious combo for A6300/6400 shooter!
Same setup. It's great!
I just got one for use on my a6500 and promptly returned it. The vignette at 16mm is huge - complete with black corners in RAW. The jpegs have black corners too. Also, there is no Lightroom lens profile yet. So to correct for it you have to crop. I am very disappointed.
I shoot on an a6000. I think will get the a6600 because I want the ibis (even though I know it isn't the greatest), the flip screen, and the battery. Then wait to find the 16-55 2.8 grey market like I have with all my apse lenses beside my kit lenses
I am very excited about this lens. Pretty just waiting to see how the detailed reviews on it turn out. I travel a lot and have been taking my a6500, leaving my FF at home. I hope it turns out to be pretty sharp in the corners compared to what I have been using, my trusty Tamron 17-55 2.8. Hopefully, it should be a massive upgrade image quality wise. This would be my first e or fe lens, so I am excited to finally use the AF.
What about the Sony A73 with the 24-105 F4? You get the same amount of bokeh, it’s stabilized, you get an extra reach and it’s not much heavier (300g/10 oz)
Why not just get a FF zoom lens equivalent? Price point and weight aside? Or are those the only defining factors?
Think will just stick to my 1650 kit lens after seeing the price.🤣
Will just use prime lenses for low light capabilities.
The kit lens is not even that bad. I saw some amazing pictures taken with it....well, time to accept the challenge and try to shoot some amazing ones as well with it. I used the sigma way too long😂
The compactness of the kit lens is unmatched! It's def an underrated lens and worth keeping. Esp compared to the $$$ of this one.
@@azvisuals tried today to shoot in lowlight, school disco (new year) of my son. No chances with f4-5,6 in low light with a6000. Luckely had a manual speedlight with trigger and diffusor. But yes, I would rather go with 3 prime lenses of sigma (16, 30, 56mm) they are 1.4 and also sharp.
I was REALLY hoping it would tow the 900-1100 dollar line. 1400 is REALLY pricey.
Well between you and me, if you wait long enough, you can snag it at that price albeit slightly used.
For a cheap hold-over, get the Sony 16-50mm f2.8 A-mount, and LA-EA2 adapter, for about $350 eBay, great quality!
Well a lot of this has to do with tariffs so don't blame Sony.
Sony missed the ball here with this long overdue, underwhelming and overpriced lens. No wonder APS-C users are leaving for FF.
Do you live outside the USA? If yes, then I have good news for you.
Great video Jason! I’m not sure that this combo (weight/size/price) makes sense to knock out my A7Riii w/Tamron 28-75 for travel and snapping family pics on hikes, etc. What are your thoughts??
Nah, like I mentioned in the video, your combo is not that much heavier. I wouldn't go for this setup vs what you already have
If you ha e it already then you are good. But if you were starting from than it is a good option due to the availability of smaller lighter apsc lenses compared to FF.
Just picked this lens up! Very happy with it, and I was able to order it for just under $1000 out of Canada!
For me the price and that it can’t be used with Ronin SC is a blocker. I own already sigma 16 mm and Sony 35 mm 1.4 and Sony 18-105 f4. I could sell 35mm and 18-105 add some $ and buy 16-55 f2.8 but but also I could just buy sigma 56 mm 1.4 and have more light, more bokeah etc. I know that I will end up with 4 lenses to change each time. What do you think? P.s. and I am waiting for a6600 to upgrade from a6000 :)
Paweł Żukiewicz I always carried two cameras with each having my favorite lens on them. So that way always ready. Prime on one telephoto on the other. I used Nikon apps-c cameras then. I often had 17-55 on one and 70-200 on the other.
Comparing this combo with a 24-70GM or tamron 28-74 is nice, but I hear fullframe users saying all the time that the Zeiss 24-70 f/4 would be the right comparison to the 16-55G f/2.8 because it's comparable in terms of DOF AND fastness (due to the better ISO performance of FF) and then there is no real weight and price advantage of the APS-C solution anymore. Although I doubt that it's on the same image quality level as the excellent 16-55G.
Hi Jason. Just want your expert opinion. Please. I have a Tamron 28-75 and I am thinking to sell it and buy a Sony 28mm f2 with 21mm converter and a Sony 55mm f1.8. is it worth it? Please reply. Thanks
If you haven't got the $$$ for good APS-C glass, how are you expecting to get any better from the FF glass? Many people printing large enough to notice the difference, or just pixel peeping?
Hi Jason,is this 1 lens enough?thanx
I was SO NERVOUS about you throwing that lens around. It’s legit giving me anxiety just thinking about it.
Lighting and colors look dope in this one! :)
I need me some Sidney Diongzon Lighting Setup!!
What PP and settings are you using brother? I love the colors.
I am quite happy with my 28-75mm Tamron on my A6600. Since I shoot mostly people - the 42mm equivalent short side is wide enough while the 112.5mm long end is absolutely great! Since I can also use the Tamron on my A7iii body, I get an extra bang for my buck...
I opted for the A7iii and Tamron 28-75mm lens instead of the A6600 and 16-55mm OSS lens.
However, the 70-350mm f/4.5-6.3 lens is tweaking my interest, I think it would be a nice combination with my A6400 to shoot in tandem with the A7iii and Tamron lens... I wish it had an f/5.6 at least aperture at the longest focal length but, I can live with f/6.3 at that weight and reach. A thousand bucks isn't too bad if the lens is as good as Sony is touting...
Hi Jason!! nice video... very useful one!!! happy weekend!!!
one new thing I noted.. APSC lens are doing a great gob with a73 !!! I am loving it
That's the part where I'm thankful for Sony cameras. Even when you transition to FF, your APSC lenses are not useless. They are still very usable! Albeit the MP drop... just dont crop!
@@JasonVong you are right!!! but I love the pics!! I have GM lenses.. but sometimes these cheap lenses are doing better ;)
One thing is certain. If you were carrying cash to the shop to buy this lens you would definitely be two handed 🤣🤣🤣 Great review. Seems like ideal small travel lens with pro results 😩😒
Welcome back Jason! Great informative video, so awesome to see APS-C alive and well. Do you think Sony will make something like a 10-22 f2.8 for APS-C in the future?
That would be nice!!
Only if this sells well. This is also indication of how the market behaves with a higher priced on lens for the apsc system
I still have a 6300, and was planning on going full frame with my next upgrade, but now I'm not so sure. Might just pick up the 16-55 to tie me over a little longer
Try renting FF system you can afford after selling your gears. Then spend an hour of two to visualize yourself what do you want to use in 2 years. Which camera would it be?
yours videos rocks... i have a question for you... who is better the SONY FE 85 mm F/1.8 or the ZEISS BETIS 85 mm F/1.8..both in mirrorless system
I'm bias... I love Zeiss. But for the price... Sony 85 is tough to beat. Both are fantastic, you're not gonna go wrong with either!
There is a Sony 18-105mm constant F4, a very nice lens for video and gimbals.
Hey Jason.
Since I change my equipment to Sony I became a fan of your videos. I own a a6000 with kit lenses only and I'm a photographer, so I'm wondering... Should invest and some lenses or it's better if I save the money and switch to full frame? What do you think?
A silly question... what are thore little red rings attached to every camera i see on youtube? Like those on the a6400 on 2:21
They're Anchor Links from Peak Design, look them up! I use them as well, makes for really convenient strap swapping.
I'll probably bite the bullet and get the a6600 and the 16-35 2.8. Definitely expensive, but this combo will be all I need for quite a while. I love the light weight of APS-C, and the image quality is great. I need to upgrade my a6000 and Sony Zeiss 16-70 4.0, so this is pretty easy for me. I can stop carrying my 35mm 1.8 for indoor work, since the new zoom will be fast enough. For making panoramas, I will continue using my 55mm 1.8, and I can get by with just two lenses for landscape work. I don't know if I will ever go full frame.
Jason, i have an a6300, and I'm strugling about what camera should I upgrade. Most of the reviews talk a lot about vídeo, but my interest is just photos. I tought about the a7iii, but i like the lighter option of the aps-c. Should I get the a6400 or the a6600? I worried about lenses like this, whitout stabilization. I know that for videos this is a big deal, but, what about photos?
With an A7iii, currently only have the 24 1.4GM, since I just sold off the 55mm 1.8 Zeiss. I wonder what I should go for, the new FE 35mm 1.8 form Sony, or the Zeiss 40/2 CF? The Sony 35mm is only 800CAD/600USD here, while the Zeiss is $1600CAD/$1200USD. Whats your opinion? Im just looking for something around the standard focal length that focus fast, and is compact. Sadly the new Sigma 45mm 2.8 shooting wide open seems very soft from reviews.
Hey Jason I currently have an a6400 and looking to upgrade. Should I go to the a6600 or a7iii or a7riv?
It's too much money for an APS-C lens. I want to upgrade to Full-Frame soon. So I'll pick up the Tamron 17-28 and use it on my a6500 along with the Sigma 56mm.
Tamron is cheaper but it ends at 28 at the long end. That's not versatile at all.
@@TVe200 I know, but I'm not ritch. The ideal purchase would be the 16-35 G. But... $$$$
I'd totally pick up this lens if it had image stabilization, but since I'm still shooting with an a6000, I need the OSS from the 16-70 f/4. But! I might pick this up along with the a7iii or a6600 for my girlfriend. Haven't decided yet.
If it makes the lens heavier, then I'm ok they left OSS out. IBIS has been doing a good job replacing the need to get OSS lenses but IBIS has to become a default thing imo. Hopefully in the near future that feature doesn't have a $500 mark up
I think it will down the road. I find it difficult to believe that they will release future cameras without IBIS.
I'm the same. I would have bought the lens if it had OSS as well (I shoot a6000 and a6300).
@@JasonVong I agree that IBIS should be standard, like it is on Olympus cameras. I don't, however, understand SONY's reasoning in not including OSS on the 16-55 when 2 of the last 3 APS-C cameras they released don't include IBIS !! It really limits the usefulness of the lens for the bulk of existing A6xxxx owners (those not owning an a6500). Sends mixed messages. Would have been more consistent to release all the new cameras with IBIS or to have released both of the new lenses with OSS.
You're back! 😁
I didn't realize people noticed! I blame World of Warcraft Classic!
Would you use this lens on the a6100? I’m new to photography and looking to buy the a6100 and seems this lens would cover the bases of having to buy multiple lenses within that range. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated
upgraded to the a7iii from the a6500 because the lack of 2.8 lenses. I might have stayed with that setup if this came out sooner. Although I would love to see some talking head interviews with the 70-350 and how the shallow depth of field looks at 200mm, might be a good b-camera interview lens!
I just got the ol' Sigma 17-50 f2.8 (it's cheap and practically no one makes a new one of the same focal length) for my new-to-me D300S
I adapt that to my a6500 and it works well.
Is it better tamron 28-75 with a7iii or the g 16-55 f2.8 with a stabilized aspc?
I'm considering Sony A6400 with either Tamron 28-75/2.8 or the new Sony 16-55/2.8. The focal lengths are obviously different, but how does those two leanses compare regarding autofocus performance and bokeh?
It was A-mount 18-50 f2.8 ssm, you can use it with adapter, but it doesn't work with all of focusing points and somehow it won't go 2.8 in video, 3.5 max... :(
Hello, one question. Normally I use my sony 6700 with the screen opened to control the overheat. If i use an external monitos like Atomos the overheat is diferent? Can I close the screen of the camera or i must record the videos with the screen opened too? thanks in advance
How about a Sony A7iii + 16-55 2.8? Instead of the 24-70mm 2.8 Gmaster?
Would be nice if Sigma would come out with a fast (2.8) 400 for Sony APS-C. Just saying. I like the new 70-350 but haven't had time to use it much yet.
Will this work for the a6400??
Guess you haven’t heard about the Fujinon XF16-55mm f2.8 which has been available for more than 4yrs now.
does it have the same autofocus capabilities? how much is it?
Nick Ruechel The fujinon is for fujifilm’s x series aps c cameras. So it wont be compatible with Sony. But Im pretty sure the fujinon is cheaper, i think its around $1200.
Lee Asid why would you even mention it then? we are talking about Sony here! what does an incompatible lens bring to the table or add to the discussion??? Smh
Nick Ruechel because Jason said there hasn’t been an aps-c lens like the Sony’s. He was definitely not talking just about the Sony but rather the entire APS-C market. Go try and listen to him again. Smh also.
The a6000 + 24-105 F4 combo is my front drag of choice... awww yiss, wrist cramps....
Would you say that this lens negates the usefulness of having the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 in your kit?
I have a question. How reliable are Memory cards for your camera after you have used them to the maximum, and then re-formatted them for your camera. I have a Nikon d3400 and I just buy new cards after one fills up to the maximum. Now I have Several cards and I don't want to continue like this. But I have been reluctant to re-format my cards and start over with that same card.
I always format my cards in camera. I learned a good tip: better to buy multiple cards of smaller sizes (64gb is best) instead of one large 256gb card that if it fails you lose everything.
I might pick up the a6600 because I do want a lighter load from the a7iii when I’m traveling or I might just get the a6400 instead. The lens I’ll pick it up for sure but the price is 🥴
Sounds like it will be a great lens. No ibis doesn’t bother me. If you shoot stills you can hand hold with faster shutter and in low light I use a tripod. Of course I started in the business when I had film in my camera. So no ibis no auto focus. I have the a6400 and if I am doing a video I use a tripod or monopod. With all the equipment we have at our disposal these days I love it. Would have loved to have had this kind of equipment back when I started. We live in exciting times and so much equipment we can choose from. So while everyone is debating over this I am out taking pictures. I agree price is a factor. Even while running my business I didn’t buy a ton of lenses or cameras. I used Nikon D200 and D300. Those were aps-c and I did weddings families babies and senior pictures with them and what lenses I did have I bought the best glass I could for them.
What do you mean at 00:11? There’s been many standard zoom f2.8 apsc lenses out for a long time. Canon, Tamron, Sigma, Fuji, Nikon.
I still got the a6300! Trying to decide where to put that money on! New Lens or New Camera :)
Great review. Love the range and the 2.8 aperture, but that price is too much.
Generally speaking, a 24-105 F4 on a FF (any brand) should be a better buy no? A Canon RP with the 24-105 RF F4 can be had for pretty cheap...much cheaper than a A6600 + this lens. (Disclaimer: I own an A6600...so not Canon fanboying here. lol)
Hi Jason, is the first version Weebill supporting the 16-55 apsc + the a6500 or not and should we at least have the Weebill "S" ?
Just one stop from the F4 mid range zoom doesn't make hardly any difference with modern sensors. What is lacking for the APS-C alphas are fast primes. Where are the F1.4's, 1.8's and F1.2's that Fuji has for their X-T line?
i'll go to full frame lens whenever i can. I do this since I was still using Nikon APSC.
The glass quality don't lie, and it's a good investment if you ever think to move up to FF camera body.
and now being FF user, there's a point that you can't look back. especially in sharpness and low ISO performance.
There's the Fuji 16-55mm f2.8, been out for years
Same applies for Sony A-mount.
I think it's 16-50/2.8
Yea, but it's 170g heavier and afaik the image quality is not on this level. The Sony 16-55G is on prime lens level with the smallest weight and size which is truely amazing.
@1Energine1 Jup. I have the brilliant Sigma trio, too. The 16-55G is in many areas on the same level. It's valid to say it's (almost) on prime lens level.
@Jason Vong, where is this lens made? Japan, Thailand, China? If you had the lens in hand you should be able to share that honest information.
Tim Melander With almost $300 in Trumpster fire tariffs, it’s clearly a Chinese product.
A question. The US Sony website tells us the maximum magnification is 0.66, the German website says it is 0.2. as you have this lense, can you tell what is correct?
Nice video dude. This lens would have been perfect, but no OSS and a price tag over £1000, might as well save for full frame. I don't think Sony was thinking about its core audience. As a crop sensor camera user, lenses over £500 are a no no. Don't get me wrong, so cool to see this, hope it works well for video. But this will be a hit in 5 years time probably, for now, its a wasted opportunity.
hi sir, i’m considering to buy this combo sony 6600 - E16-55 f2.8 - ronin sc.
Do this gimbal balance without counterweight? thanks sir!!!
Thanks a lot for this video. Really appreciate it. Just a question, do you recommend this lens to take fashion/portraits photos (without a tripod) combined with a Sony a6100? Thanks in advance and thanks for all your great videos
I bought both the new Sony zooms and love them.
I did to and returned the 70-350. What's up with that narrow apeture? Terrible.
I noticed you were panning with what looks like a monopod & gimbal in the airshow clip. If so, would you tell us what that experience was like compared to handheld panning. Thanks😃
fantastic , we need a comparison between sony 16-55mm vs sigma 18-35mm please
I have the a6500, will not upgrade until Sony improves the view finder resolution. Yes, I have been waiting for a lens like the 16-55mm. Would like it better with OSS, even better if it went out to 70mm, and surely if it was $400 cheaper. But I will probably get it - when it goes on sale. haha
Great review, looking for a versatile lens like this for travel! Do you think this lens is worth it when paired with a Sony a6100 for solely photography?
What about the Sony DT 16-50mm f2.8? Used plus an adapter is only like $500
If you want subpar af and burst shot then go for it. Adapting always come with a cost. That kinda beats the point of owning a modern mirrorless systen.
Of course everybody use case are different but if that suits you why not?
The main reason I went with Sony in the first place was to get the lightest package a "DSLR-quality" camera could achieve. Now with my obsolete α5100 and my 18-105mm f4, I'm super happy. But seeing the α6600 and the 16-55mm being announced made me go back to my first love: low-light versatility.
Since I went to search in-depth for Sony's camera system, I've heard the praises for the Tamron 28-75mm f2.8, so I wanted that lens at first. But knowing that it cannot cover the wide end on APS-C (which is the only system I could afford as a broke college student), I hesitated on it and went instead with the Sony 18-105mm f4 (thanks to my Dad). But now that I'm earning on photography, I'm absolutely getting the 16-55mm f2.8 and the α5100, and no one may stop me.
Thanks for sharing your story! 18-105mm is still a heavy hitter! You can still consider it and maybe throw in a few primes instead of going for the 16-55 G Lens unless you just a one and done lens.
@@JasonVong I like being a one and done guy lol. Yes, I like having a prime or two in my bag for that super clean and super sharp low-light output, but I like versatility more than anything. So after having the 16-55mm f2.8 in the future, I want to buy the Sigma 30mm f1.4. That's next in line.
Btw, people always tell me to go for primes after my 18-105mm. But hey, this was a second option to the then-fabled 24-70mm equiv lens. Oh, and the 18-105mm is a perfect lens for events work. Boi, I could talk all day about this lens. I just like to have that 16-55mm f2.8 now lol
@@JasonVong and the Majestic Jason Vong actually replied and "hearted" my comment! I can die happily now!
Or you can just get sigma 16mm and call it a day. You got 24mm and all around f4 zoom lens.
@@trym2121 I don't shoot wide that often lol. But I really need and want that versatility of a bright zoom. And yes, I like the Sigma 16mm f1.4 as well. I want a collection of those, in fact lol. #YouCanNeverHaveTooMuchLenses
How about the a-mount version? SAL1650. Also, how does the a-mount version competes with the e-mount version?
Sorry, I haven't used A-mount before so hard for me to comment.
Amazing analysis :)
I'm rather new to cameras. I currently have the a 6300, sigma 16mm, and the g lens 18 to 105 which is usually my go to lens for video since it doesn't extend and makes it perfect for gimbal work and has ibis. No ibis and telescoping makes me not like it as much as well as the price of this new lens.
For me I don’t think it’s worth the money to get aps-c.. I may be biased because I currently use full frame but let’s say I’m starting out and buying my first camera I would save a little more and get the a7iii with either tamron 17-28 or 24-70 both f2.8 and both cheaper than an aps-c lens. Great video Jason always love your videos. I’m actually a prime lens kinda guy but starting to really be persuaded to get a zoom lens cause of the high rave of the tamron
It's worth it if you value size over DoF
nightryder21
It’s not that much bigger. I think Jason said there was a 1lb difference. 1400 for apsc body and another 1400 for the lens vs a7iii 2k usd and tamron lens for about same price
Does it works on fullframe??
If an APSC 16-55 equals 24-82.5 mm full frame. Then is what does f2.8 equals?
That's... a tony northrup question haha
The equivalent would be approx. F4.2 on full frame
Jason Vong 😂
Romsky thanks
Getting a 24-70 f4 with an a7iii would essentially cost you the same amount of money.... But you have a full frame camera with a newer sensor. Or you could get the tamron 28-75 at 2.8, then the a6600 would need an f1.8 lens to compete with it
You should use the lens on the A7RIV. I know it’s very silly, but why not?! S35 mode and 24-82,5 f4! Not bad at all
It's not compatible with FF cameras.
Since you mentioned using it on a a7r4, curious how much vignetting you will get at different focal length in FF without turning on APSC mode. I’m guessing on the 16mm end probably not much but the 55mm you can probably get a much more working pixels?
I was really excited about this lens, and then I saw the price.
Nope. I will never get this 2.8 zoom lenses for aps-c. Pretty much no bokeh, so why not 4.0? Cheaper and lighter. But then... why not just compact camera? For me APS-C has sense mostly with primes - 16/1.4, 30/1.4, 56/1.4. Or maybe zoomes like 18-35/1.8.
I wish sigma make a 18-55 f1.8E mount lens for Sony Apsc camera systems...
Well i wish, but f2.8 is enough bcs if bigger than 2.8 i think it will be expensive
That would be a dream come true, but even if 2.8 it would be worth it
Awesome lens
This lens is really good but I am more of a prime lens kind of guy. Also, I am now thinking about switching to full-frame. I even ordered my first full-frame lens, the Sony FE 85mm F1.8.
Nice! Welcome to Full Frame!
@@JasonVong Slow down lol. I haven't ordered a full-frame body yet. I'll start with full-frame glass first.
@@rjacob06 I know you. You will get it.
@@JasonVong I have been shopping around for full-frame bodies. Do you think the A7RII is worth buying? The camera is within my budget and I like the high MP count.
Rae Jacob good choice
Which camera and lens you used to shoot this video??
I was thinking about getting the 70-350mm just for photos on my a6400 but seems it is not recommended. What’s a good alternative with OSS with a similar price point?
need a vid comparing this to the tamron rxd and the sigma telephoto....on apsc of course