Philosophers About Time
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 มิ.ย. 2023
- Uncover the mysteries of time with Augustine of Hippo, Martin Heidegger, and Gilles Deleuze. Experience Augustine's subjective time and its tie to memory. Discover Heidegger's authentic time and the power of being present. Explore Deleuze's multiplicity of temporalities and fragmented experiences. Embrace diverse perspectives on time, enriching your understanding. Join us on this philosophical journey through the tapestry of time.
Art By Pinterest - ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
A philosophy of history is incomplete without a consideration of the philosophy of time.
Time is the awareness, feeling and measure of motion, of things that are before and after. Thanks Aristotle!
When we look up at the night sky we are looking into the past.
How can you comprehend any fundamental concept, when a fundamental concept is itself the means by which you comprehend ?
Great video. Would Augustine of Hippo be categorized as part of "phenomenologist" line of thinkers then?
Amazing content! Very precise and well spoken! Keep it up!
Have a great day!
Thanks so much!😇
keep making videos, love your content 👍👍👍
🙏😇Thankyou very much!
Great videos on your channel
Thank you!🙏
In my opinion, time is the creative activity of God.
Keep it up 😊 amazing
Thank you so much 🙏
I think about gravity a lot.
Thanks for the vid! Do u narrate these or is this AI?
I'm Sorry, I wish i could, but i don't speak English perfectly due to my native accent, that is why this is my only hope. 🙏❤️
@@philllusion no worries! It’s a great vid nonetheless
Istg I wrote my own theory bout time and thought of making a TH-cam video, next day this came to my feed.
Hahaha, you should make one then! I'm sure it's gonna be awesome.
Please do!
The statement 'a man steps in the same river twice' is only meaningful if there is a man and a river. But a man by definition is something that lives beyond a single moment, and a river by definition is something that flows constantly. So, once you take-away the passing of time, you take-away the meaningfulness of the statement. It is not false, it is just meaningless. In order for it to be true or false, it would have to first be meaningful. If there is a man, and if there is a river, then it becomes a real possibility that he might or might not step into the same river twice. He might step into the river once, and step into it again, thus making the statement true; or, he might only step into the river once, withdraw his foot, and never step into it again, in which case the statement would be false. But to say a man cannot step into the same river twice because neither one endures is nonsense, for stepping itself is something that requires time, as does the existence of the man and the river. Take-away the passing of time, and you take-away the context in which the statement is meaningful. This kind of word-play belongs in Wonderland with the White Rabbit and the Mad Hatter, and it is mere sophistry to take Heraclitus literally.
Of course, it can be maintained that Heraclitus is just using a metaphor here. Now, strangely, his point seems to be akin to that of Parmenides and Zeno -- who are supposed to be his polar opposites. Time, motion and change are not real for Parmenides and Zeno because Being simply exists and it is the only thing that exists, thus there is nothing else for it to become, or to change into, (and, as they would have it), time itself must be illusion, for time is simply a kind of change, but change is, (as we have seen in their theory) impossible. Now, Heraclitus, in contrast, is supposed to believe that change is the only reality, and Being (or permanence) is only an illusion. But, as the first paragraph above demonstrates, without endurance (meaning existence over a period of time), there is nothing in existence in the first place that can possibly change. In other words, Heraclitus' notion of 'pure change' is absurd ! No less absurd is Parmenides and Zeno's idea of 'absolute permanence'. 'Permanence' itself is only meaningful in the context of the passing of time. So, both positions turn-out to be a denial of time, motion, real change, and real permanence, and even real existence in any form whatsoever. Which is to say, they are both utter nonsense !
We mistake entropic change, for time. We mistake memory for the past and anticipation for the future. In fact all we really have is one, eternal now. Time is fixed, it is objects that flow. The present DOESN'T slip immediately away to anywhere! Those are just words we have learnt to repeat. Look for yourself and see! The present is the most fixed and stable thing in this objective world on fire with entropic flux. This is valid. If not, show me, please. 😐
Please cut the incessant music.
Try Infinity Squared.
T.E.N. The Eternal Now 010 dimensions