Beethoven - Piano concerto n°5 - Gilels / Ludwig
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ค. 2024
- Ludwig van Beethoven
Piano concerto n°5 op.73
I. Allegro 0:00
II. Adagio un poco mosso 19:42
III. Rondo. Allegro - Più allegro 28:59
Emil Gilels
Philharmonia Orchestra
Leopold Ludwig
Studio recording, London (30.IV-01.V.1957) - เพลง
Just magnificent. This along with the 4rth (with the same conductor) are two of the finest examples of "interpretative" genius. No moon beams and sighting of such extra-terrestrial phenomena! Just Beethoven. These two versions along the 3rd with Szell and the Vienna Philharmonic are recordings to cherish. I have been listening to this version of the "Emperor" since i was about 5 years old! and i am nearing 60. Many thanks. Hari
I was going to reply... But I'm lost for words ... ..
Бессмертный Бетховен! Его гений всегда будет лекарством для человеческого общества от мещанства и мелкобуржуазности. Высочайшая красота духа! Великолепный Гилельс!
9
Emil Gilels, certainly the best pianist-performer of Ludwig!!
Какой брильянтовый звук! Класс!👍
21:29 I don't think this scale has been played more beautifully. Emil Gilels was truly a remarkable pianist. How wonderful that he has left us such unforgettable recordings.
Es el más. precioso. de los conciertos.
Шедевр!
The Emperor of both the piano and the music.
Great Gilels in arguably the noblest piano concerto of them all! A model and inspiration.
I have been through 3 copies of this immortal recording.
the quintessential great great classical pianist ....... he is one of the truly greats
Ears wide open and speechless
Thank you so much for uploading these concertos. I have them all on LP, but now unplayable because they are totally worn out because I listened so many times :-)
Those recordings are still my favorite recordings. Good for the Desert Island!
Klare und spannende Interpretation dieses majestätischen Meisterwerks mit perfekt artikuliertem Schlag des Soloklaviers und gut phrasierten Töne des ganzen Orchesters. Der geniale Dirigent leitet das ausgezeichnete Orchester im relativ schnellen Tempo mit völlig effektiver Dynamik. Echt unvergleichlicher Pianist!
Adagio♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️Eternity beauty...Words can't describe!!!💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝
PERFECT！PERFECT！PERFECT！
Потрясающе!!!
Никто и никогда не сравнится с великим Гилельсом в интерпретации Бетховена!!! Как будто сам автор творит за волшебным роялем...
So beautiful
Superbe.
The best version I've ever heard of this concerto.
Fischer and Furtwängler? Schnabel and Galliera?
(Don’t get me wrong Gilels is untouchable and it is as embarrassing as it is glorious to hear bits of Beethoven that I genuinely didn’t know thanks to this channel/dude... th-cam.com/video/fafEIfCp-bs/w-d-xo.html)
Amazing.....we loved it!
!!!!! Мне очень нравиться.!
Absolutely amazingly beautiful. So much Grace 😍😳😳🤯🤯
Grandiosa esecuzione. Grazie a Incontrarlo Motu. Il secondo movimento è celestiale, come se lo eseguisse la Louise de Broglie ritratta da Ingres.
BRAVO!!!!!! DĚKUJI!
에밀길레스는 내가 닮고 싶은 신의 손을 가지셨어요. 감사합니다.
나는 지금 집도 없는 나그네지만 야마하 일제 그랜드 피아노도 갖고 싶다. 나도 짬짬이 연습해야겠어요. 무인도에 1가지만 가져갈 수 있다면 아마도 피아노가 될 겁니다. 야마하 일제 피아노 너무 멋지고 예술이지요.
일본이라는 나라도 뭐든지 잘 만드시고 참 대단해요. 👍
Grande interpretação!!!!!
Está bien solo un movimiento ,es muy largo completo. ☑️🎶🎶🎶
Simply perfect ......
apofeoz russkoy sovetsko fortepiannoy shkoli s yeyo natselennostyu na soderjatelnuyu glubinu,masshtab
nost zamisla+lichnaya chistota pianizma,idealnaya zvukovaya kultura etogo nezabivayemogo mastera
Bla-bla
The 4th and 5th Beethoven piano concerts with Gilels playing with Ludwig are for me and many others, real masterworks. Needless to say Gilels is considered one of the best XXth Century pianists, with artists of the size of Glenn Gould, Richter, Argerich, Weissenberg or Horowitz. Although I was never fond of this last one. I prefer what he did here than his more recent recordings with Szell. These works, where his powerful, steel fingers, piano shines and prevails over the orchestra, where the melody phrasing is the dominant of the whole, it's all so perfectly done here, that it becomes impossible not to have these cds. Of course he has to be mentioned also for his Brahms Concerts and his Beethoven Sonatas. Gilels remains a piano giant, an icon of the best Classical Music. Although nowadays we have the Sudbin or the Aimard ones, I warmly recommend this couple of Concerts. They are "the" reference. 🎵🎶🆗👍💙
LMAO at Weissenberg. No. Just no. Not him.
LMAO at Weissenberg. No. Just no. Not him.
Idk if you mean Alexis Weissenberg. If you mean him, he's not comparable to the others you mentioned.
@@epicaunleashed8764 yes, I know Weissenberg musicality is questioned. More than anywhere in his Beethoven Concerts. But I haven't mentioned Weissenberg in what refers to the Beethoven Piano Concerts. Have I⁉️ ➖just said that my fav accounts are those of Gilels with Ludwig, Aimard with Hanoncourt, Sudbin in his 4th and 5th and surely also Lisiecki with the St Martins. Did I mentioned Weissenberg with Karajan⁉️ ➖for I consider Weissenberg with Karajan a Karajan failure as some others he has. Then yes, you possibly right, those Weissenberg renditions aren't his best. So, I suppose you aren't really addressing to me. Or were you⁉️
@@epicaunleashed8764 Oh, I see, you mean I shouldn't include Weissenberg among names of the size of Gilels, Argerich, Gould, Richter, and Horowitz. Though am not very fond of Horowitz, anyway. Well, if so, you're probably right, too, there. You surely think he was too cold and steel fingered. The thing with Weissenberg is that I like his tone pitch and with some things he did great recordings. As with his Mozart 21st, his Rach 3 and his Nocturnes. Darker and stronger, as his rendition is. I've read his Schuman Carnaval was also very good, but have been unable to find any recording. Neither to hear it in TH-cam. But you're surely right about not to compare him to those great names. 👍🏻🤗🙏
Criticism generally prefers more the first cycle of the five Beethoven piano concertos recorded by Gilels for HMV (L.V.D.S.M) in Paris and London in the 1950s that was supremely good (though, the Fourth Concerto apart, largely unsung in the public media) and a later cycle made in Russia for Melodiya with Sanderling and the Leningrad PO was not far behind. After that, "alas", came the cycle with Szell: recordings made by Columbia team in Severance Hall, Cleveland, in April and May 1968 that neither caught the general imagination nor won any kind of larger critical endorsement.
Where did you dig out all this nonsense, or just invented it? Read the papers of the 60s ( NY, Philadelphia, London) to see totally different picture of his performances through the 60s.
5:35
7:59
9:30
14:05
21:30
זה לא אנושי זה כמו חוש שישי!!!
♥♥♥♫
For Martin Sweaney: All opinions on great artists are subjunctive. But not ill-considered. It's a matter of taste. And what drives you crazy when you're lying in bed in the darkness and just listening. As far as truth goes, what is that? By the way, I'm an old-timer, so what does Golfo mean? Also, have you heard Gould play the Bach concertos?
It is the second movement I don't understand: It is played so feminine, soft and tender - almost surreal and too dream-like that the music, albeit some of Beethoven's most beautiful piano music, is now rendered almost entirely shapeless. No, I don't understand it. Forgive me.
+amendoesit Well, look at Beethoven's score: the piano enters at pianissimo espressivo -- and it does certainly fit the music. Later on, Beethoven indicates "cantabile" and I can't imagine many other performances being as songlike as this one. Beethoven also indicates that a section be played sweetly ("dolce"). This interpretation is not at all shapeless. And I defy you to define what you mean by "feminine." As Nicholas Kennedy says below, this is perhaps the noblest of all piano concertos; but, nobility doesn't exclude soft, expressive -- even sweet -- playing. It covers the gamut of human expression.
It's a long, long benediction, a prayer, a gorgeous contemplation and one of the most beautiful examples of Beethoven's gentler muse, realized perfectly by the pianist and conductor.
Adagio un poco mosso. So one can go in any direction indeed.
chudesnaia proizvidenie i chudesnaia ispalnenie
The is the earliest recording of the Beethoven's 5th by Gilels in the west and the best. As he grew older (after mid-1960's), he became more brilliant but lost his sensitive touch. Same happened to Oistrakh (after mid-1950's).
On technical side, this recording has significant distortions and needs to be clean up. Among all the early recordings of this work, only Fischer / Furtwangler's recording (1951) has been restored to complete satisfaction.
I’m sorry, but where are you getting this info from? If you look at the articles about his performances in the 60s at Carnegie and other concert halls- he outperformed himself, becoming much better, (comparing to the 50s), not only technically but artistically. He became the best pianist of the 20th century.
@@stonefireice6058 Except for Richter, as Gilels himself implied.
I agree with amendoesit 100%. Gilels is wonderful, but nothing can ever compare with Gould.
Martin Sweaney "Subjunctive"?
Especially Gould with
Stokowski.
Did Gould ever played Beethoven? Never heard it,,but nobody argues his interpretation of Bach works.
Gould Adagio , 9.23 with Stokowski , and 7.35 with Karel Ancerl
Nice performance,but I think that Annie Fischer was the best performer of Beethoven's music
just another opinion
Gilels is outstanding, but i sincerely prefer Bernstein conducting Beethoven
The best next to Michelangeli.