I was questioning why symmetry didn't apply for the second half of the superposition analysis, then had my "duh" moment about where which inputs and outputs were being used. :) I have really enjoyed all your lectures and gotten great understanding and some warm fuzzies remembering my own undergraduate studies from too many yeas ago. Keep up the great work!,
15:09 So obviously the R_K/(R_K + r_ki2) factor is complicating things. But if you want to compensate, I think you have to consider in what way. It seems reasonable to adjust the load resistances to make the responses to v_i1 of v_o1 and v_o2 to sum to zero. But if you do that, the responses to v_i2 will be more skewed than they were to begin with. I guess you can't have the cake and eat it in this case. Perhaps if you could mix some of the original signal with one of the outputs... But then the large signal response will probably be more skewed (and the circuit more complex). Or maybe that v_o2 response doesn't matter quite as much.
Is there a good list of like, what would be prerequisites in the context of a college course, but are just topics you should know to fully understand this as a non-EECS major?
professor, I'm working o a transistor long pair and now raised the question. isn't that some sort of a dual voltage divider although having a transistor in between? the 2 resistor on top of both transistor from the supply and the one common tied emitter the negative supply. what does actually happen between both resistor if you activate one transistor?
I was questioning why symmetry didn't apply for the second half of the superposition analysis, then had my "duh" moment about where which inputs and outputs were being used. :) I have really enjoyed all your lectures and gotten great understanding and some warm fuzzies remembering my own undergraduate studies from too many yeas ago. Keep up the great work!,
15:09 So obviously the R_K/(R_K + r_ki2) factor is complicating things. But if you want to compensate, I think you have to consider in what way. It seems reasonable to adjust the load resistances to make the responses to v_i1 of v_o1 and v_o2 to sum to zero. But if you do that, the responses to v_i2 will be more skewed than they were to begin with. I guess you can't have the cake and eat it in this case. Perhaps if you could mix some of the original signal with one of the outputs... But then the large signal response will probably be more skewed (and the circuit more complex). Or maybe that v_o2 response doesn't matter quite as much.
Is there a good list of like, what would be prerequisites in the context of a college course, but are just topics you should know to fully understand this as a non-EECS major?
I highly recommend the free electric circuits and electronics courses my colleague Bonnie Ferri has on Coursera.
Do Linear Circuits 1: DC Analysis, then Linear Circuits 2: AC Analysis, then top it off with Introduction to Electronics.
@@Lantertronics thank you!
professor, I'm working o a transistor long pair and now raised the question.
isn't that some sort of a dual voltage divider although having a transistor in between?
the 2 resistor on top of both transistor from the supply and the one common tied emitter the negative supply.
what does actually happen between both resistor if you activate one transistor?
Hmmm... maybe? I can't think of a way to make the voltage divider analogy work, really, when you have that transistor in between.