ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก

French secularism: Anti-religious or safeguarding freedoms?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 พ.ย. 2016
  • Subscribe to France 24 now :
    f24.my/youtubeEN
    FRANCE 24 live news stream: all the latest news 24/7
    f24.my/YTliveEN
    This week we take a closer look at France's cherished state secularism. Laïcité [secularism], a product of French history and philosophy, is central to how France defines itself. But critics say it is anti-religious and increasingly used to stigmatise Muslims. Is laïcité compatible with a multicultural society? We spoke to Jean-Louis Bianco, the President of the National Observatory on Secularism, to find out more.
    Visit our website :
    www.france24.com
    Subscribe to our TH-cam channel :
    f24.my/youtubeEN
    Like us on Facebook :
    / france24.english
    Follow us on Twitter :
    / france24_en

ความคิดเห็น • 282

  • @emptyhad2571
    @emptyhad2571 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    The French version and American version of “Freedom of Religion” are different.

    • @ChrisBergernson-oe9zy
      @ChrisBergernson-oe9zy 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We had already got religions War in Europe and also in France ( catholics against protestants) .
      If some péople would criticise m'y country .No problèm.
      When you will have a religion War in 2023 .
      Don't bé surprise if violence could Come .
      So when You go to m'y country ,You respect m'y laws .
      Nowadays some New citizens believe that they could do everything because of politicians lies .
      You see what IS happening in France : violence in thé suburb ,protest in thé streets ,thé French président doesn't do anything just communication .....
      So ...

    • @supercharger5727
      @supercharger5727 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yea one doesn’t have it and the other does

    • @here_we_go_again2571
      @here_we_go_again2571 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      USA ...... = Freedom OF Religion (if your "religion" is "no religion" ; that is a religious choice)
      FRANCE = Freedom FROM Religion

  • @m.b.8282
    @m.b.8282 3 ปีที่แล้ว +94

    I am from Turkey(for real I am not a bot) dont let them take your secularism defend it religious try to destroy it and take control of government

    • @indrajit57
      @indrajit57 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      so proud of you

    • @thegreatrestoration6784
      @thegreatrestoration6784 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@indrajit57 Secularism sucks! Go back to Catholicism! We will take back Europe!

    • @XDKnoori
      @XDKnoori 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thegreatrestoration6784 .

    • @thegreatrestoration6784
      @thegreatrestoration6784 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@XDKnoori you disagree?

    • @XDKnoori
      @XDKnoori 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thegreatrestoration6784 no I just saved your comment lol

  • @naf_k5126
    @naf_k5126 3 ปีที่แล้ว +101

    If humans have to live in peace on this planet a complete 'separation of religion and state' has to be accepted and strictly implemented.

    • @nouhn1878
      @nouhn1878 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      I'm a Muslim but Secular and Non Religious,I believe in God but I also believe in evolution, I grew up in a Secular school that taught both the Bible and Quran so I celebrated Christian and Muslim holidays,I don't pray,I sometimes fast during Ramadan although sometimes I choose not to fast it usually comes down to preference,I rarely read the Quran in fact I've read only one page of it in my whole life,I support LGBTQ and Women's rights,I respect all religions and I see all of them as perfectly equal to one another,And I would date a Non Muslim (Yes even the people who are not from the Abrahmic Religions),I would also marry a Non Muslim and I would not convert him/her because I'm Secular and I despise forced conversions,I would allow a normal pet inside my home but no snakes,crocodiles or anything strange like that,I think women should choose whether to be modest or not, I'm very Liberal,I would not go to a mosque for Religious reasons, if I had a daughter I would allow her to marry a Non Muslim as long as she does not convert him/her,And I dislike it when Religion is involved in politics etc.

    • @arandomperson1042
      @arandomperson1042 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Actually banning religious symbols, creates more divide and oppression instead of neutrality because religious people have a disadvantage, while atheists and non relgious people have the higher ground in terms of freedom because they do not subject themselves to religious rulings, but if france allowed religious symbols, nonreligious people would be still happy because they can wear their non religious attire which makes them comfortable and religious people can wear their religious attire which makes them comfortable. If public display of religion is banned, what makes a public display of secular atheism somehow more morally acceptable.

    • @AbhinavKumar-ov3xf
      @AbhinavKumar-ov3xf 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@arandomperson1042 Yeah its the same as relegious dominated countries, theres only of shift of authority to atheist, no freedom

    • @XDKnoori
      @XDKnoori ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@nouhn1878 you are no longer a Muslim

    • @indianboy59
      @indianboy59 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don't agree.

  • @jtlovestj
    @jtlovestj 7 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    Don't ever lose your secularism, France.

    • @elizabethathisayamany7674
      @elizabethathisayamany7674 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      That secular crap only works when Christians are majority.

    • @leviosadream2454
      @leviosadream2454 5 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      @@elizabethathisayamany7674 Most people are atheist in France actually.

    • @guyp9596
      @guyp9596 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @LeviosaDream No, Catholic.

    • @lordliberty8885
      @lordliberty8885 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@guyp9596 Literally 63% of French are non-religious

    • @kittycatwithinternetaccess2356
      @kittycatwithinternetaccess2356 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lordliberty8885 I thought i was 40%

  • @ericlouclair2585
    @ericlouclair2585 5 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    1. Religion is private matter!
    2. Religion is private matter!
    3. Religion is private matter!

    • @arandomperson1042
      @arandomperson1042 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      If religion should be a private matter, then so should atheism, i mean thats the only secular neutral approach.

    • @folofus4815
      @folofus4815 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Repeating the lie doesn’t make it true.

    • @lui8806
      @lui8806 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@arandomperson1042
      atheism is not an ideology nor a belief system with a holy book a set of rules and fairytales, so not quite the same thing

    • @arandomperson1042
      @arandomperson1042 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lui8806 what harm does it cause to allow religious clothing in public.

    • @lui8806
      @lui8806 ปีที่แล้ว

      @arandomperson1042
      This might seem like an extremist move from the French government to some. But these are the actions that need to be made to counter crazy cultists that try to sell a religion and push it (aka pushing a harmful scam full of harmful ideologies), plus the people that use their cult as a justification for discrimination and going against science and logic. At the end, a religion is no more different or dangerous than a cult, it's only difference is the number of followers.

  • @Lucas_Ordonez
    @Lucas_Ordonez ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This is just a perfect example of secularism turning into it’s own form of religion

    • @lorenzomizushal3980
      @lorenzomizushal3980 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      it's an ideology not a religion. it's like saying being anti terrorist is a form of terrorism

    • @viridia1526
      @viridia1526 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don’t get why muslims think this is a dig at their religion when secularism targets others religion too. We need to get over ourselves.

    • @Lucas_Ordonez
      @Lucas_Ordonez 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@viridia1526 Well I’m not a Muslim, I just believe in a religious person’s right to practice their religion how they want to as long as it isn’t harming anyone

    • @Lucas_Ordonez
      @Lucas_Ordonez 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lorenzomizushal3980 I mean religion is a form of ideology, but I see your point regardless wearing a hijab,kippah,yamaka,kufi,taqiyah,cross, or any other form of clothing is in no way harming anyone and is not a form of forcing your religion on to others so why does it matter

    • @lorenzomizushal3980
      @lorenzomizushal3980 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@Lucas_Ordonez It's the ideology of French Secularism. It's not freedom of religion, but freedom from religion. From there stems all these laws.
      You could say it's a type of religion, perhaps a secular religion. It's probably the same as how certain Islamic countries ban pornography. You could ask the same question, how is my watching pornography harm anyone, why does it matter? Yet they make the ban. I'm not saying a hijab is the same as porn, but the point is neither wearing the hijab nor watching pornography harms anyone but such laws are made, and sovereign nations are free to make the laws of their countries. And each countries appeal to certain ideals, beliefs, or ideologies, or even religions, to guide their laws. Such is the case with France.
      I agree the hijab doesn't harm anyone, but I agree with its ban in government domains based on the ideology of French Secularism. Just as I'm sure certain Muslims agree with the ban on pornography in Islamic countries.

  • @HarshParmarviolin
    @HarshParmarviolin 4 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    I like this type of secularism...

    • @leanderbarreto6523
      @leanderbarreto6523 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      India needs this

    • @misteranonymous5616
      @misteranonymous5616 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@leanderbarreto6523 I second that

    • @hassanu.7799
      @hassanu.7799 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@leanderbarreto6523 until they make it so no one can have religion right? What an idiot

    • @sufficientmagister9061
      @sufficientmagister9061 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@hassanu.7799
      Islam is a negative memeplex.

    • @thegreatrestoration6784
      @thegreatrestoration6784 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@leanderbarreto6523 Then cows would go to the slaughter. Not that I would care since I love beef.

  • @millevenon5853
    @millevenon5853 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    I love French secularism

    • @thegreatrestoration6784
      @thegreatrestoration6784 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I hate it!
      We need to go back to the Union of Church and state where Catholicism is the only religion allowed.

    • @Fylnnn
      @Fylnnn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@thegreatrestoration6784 the fact is majority of french and even europe isn't religious at all lol, And who identified themself at Christian is just for formality lol

    • @Lyallpuriya
      @Lyallpuriya 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's dictatorship!

    • @allergy5634
      @allergy5634 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@thegreatrestoration6784 I assume this is a joke. But I can’t be too sure...

    • @thegreatrestoration6784
      @thegreatrestoration6784 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@allergy5634 I was serious. Read Catholic Prophesy.

  • @ldb427
    @ldb427 6 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    And what about the separation of state and freemasonry?

    • @hexa1905
      @hexa1905 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      freemasonry died into a small private club for secular atheist/agnotics .
      all they do now is having fun waching you still beeing christian.

    • @lemire86
      @lemire86 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      thanks, u made my day

    • @here_we_go_again2571
      @here_we_go_again2571 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Freemasonry is not
      an apparatus of the
      state. Freemasonry
      is a club of like-minded
      individuals. It has
      nothing to do with
      the state or country
      of France.

  • @imperatorscientiaestpotent8403
    @imperatorscientiaestpotent8403 4 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    Laicite is the best gift Slovenia inherited from the French.

    • @indrajit57
      @indrajit57 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      yes indeed

    • @salsapassion4life
      @salsapassion4life 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You mean the most stupid thing ever

    • @thegreatrestoration6784
      @thegreatrestoration6784 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rubbish! Laicite is the reason why the World is corrupt!

    • @rhinoareaction7587
      @rhinoareaction7587 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thegreatrestoration6784 sure thing the middle East isn't corrupt at all

    • @thegreatrestoration6784
      @thegreatrestoration6784 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rhinoareaction7587 The Middle East is corrupt because of their Religion

  • @richardgomes5420
    @richardgomes5420 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    France once again leading ideas, leading fairness, leading progress.

    • @jonjonboi3701
      @jonjonboi3701 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nah France is becoming woke

    • @linhhoang1725
      @linhhoang1725 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@jonjonboi3701 always has been. Ever since the 1789

    • @CelticVictory
      @CelticVictory ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@linhhoang1725 Wokeness is something new and it's leading France astray.

    • @leohe2594
      @leohe2594 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@CelticVictory nope, France has always been progressive in ideals since 1789

    • @CelticVictory
      @CelticVictory ปีที่แล้ว

      @@leohe2594 Wokeness hasn't even been around since 1789. And I guess that makes the Reign of Terror progressive.

  • @mattpostle753
    @mattpostle753 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    In my British eyes this seems more like silly, wokish big government from France. Separate church from state, yes is a good idea. However you now have these wokish secular obsessives banning hijabs in schools (if I want to wear a hijab in a school what has that got to do with the government as it is my personal choice and I am not upsetting anyone) . Keep church and state separate but leave people to have personal choice in day to day life. This big govt approach of ramming secularism down people's throats has got France in a real mess and more people will die because of it.

    • @waladoopa2667
      @waladoopa2667 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      veils are already banned in high school in France. you get expelled if u wear one

    • @aloukan5805
      @aloukan5805 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      agree, it seems they are forcing people with their secularism. No way you can call this neutrality. While the rights of the minority are being taken away

    • @kaylenjohnson1351
      @kaylenjohnson1351 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Matt I agree. Like yes separation of Church and State but why ban Crucifixes and Hijabs? Gosh.

    • @heldertorres4296
      @heldertorres4296 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I'm a swiss person and I live in the UK....and in Switzerland ( Geneva ) and we do not let anyone bring religious STUFFS to school and I do totally agree is a private matter ...should be at your own home.. in public sphere should not have space . And we have proud on that ...you can do anything in your house on public places no...your you respect our society or no space for you in it... And there no discussion in Switzerland about that because is voted by the people in referendum so if the people say so you just have to obey or leave . When i came to the UK I had conscious that you have religion in school here, even if I don't agree I've to accept and respect since is your tradition.

    • @heldertorres4296
      @heldertorres4296 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kaylenjohnson1351 because hijab do not respect the society . Is against the law gave your face cover in Switzerland and in France...and that's is for everyone .religion has no space in public space , people have to accept having the face cover is not a rigth since is ilegal to have the face cover in any situation if not medical...

  • @dannyisnow1004
    @dannyisnow1004 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Protect secularism. Never let religion decide country future nor how it shall it be governed.

  • @dblev2019
    @dblev2019 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Are the French really that proud of their disdain towards religion.
    The wall of separation alluded to by Thomas Jefferson in a letter to the Danbury Baptist was a direct reference to the first amendment This is what Jefferson said:
    “I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.”
    The wall of separation was simply a prohibition on government. It protects citizens from a state imposed religion, and restricts the state from prohibiting religious expression. The covid lockdowns was a clear violation of separation of church and state as the government clearly interfered the natural rights of the individual, imposing rules from the state on how and when to worship!

    • @bonjour_1941
      @bonjour_1941 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thomas Jefferson made a mistake by not also limiting the church
      Separation of church and state can't exist as long as the church can interfere with the state the US is a good example of this
      The French are right the church has no place in state funded schools or government keep it in your churches and homes

  • @NormandyFoye
    @NormandyFoye 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Not only is it safeguarding freedoms it is safeguarding people who choose not to follow religion And the maniacal, violent extremism that often accompanies it.

    • @aaronruss6331
      @aaronruss6331 ปีที่แล้ว

      Quite ignorant of you to believe that only religious people can become extremists. Early to mid 20th century and socialism anyone?

    • @CelticVictory
      @CelticVictory ปีที่แล้ว

      That's doubtful.

    • @parthibhayat
      @parthibhayat 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's a bit targeted, no?

    • @UnknownEvil_BadAliens
      @UnknownEvil_BadAliens 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, christians or jewish people can't wear cross or kippa.
      The religion is something private in france, and is separated from state building. It's something that protect us all
      (From unending conflicts mostly)@@parthibhayat

  • @littleantukins4415
    @littleantukins4415 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Needs to happen in the US

    • @folofus4815
      @folofus4815 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Hell no

    • @littleantukins4415
      @littleantukins4415 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@folofus4815 order before freedom

    • @aaronruss6331
      @aaronruss6331 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Secularism literally exists in the most country's in the world.

    • @CelticVictory
      @CelticVictory ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That would be a terrible idea.

    • @CelticVictory
      @CelticVictory ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@littleantukins4415 That's called tyranny.

  • @nutanfulmali3798
    @nutanfulmali3798 4 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Religion is private matter 🙂

    • @aloukan5805
      @aloukan5805 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      So why is the government interfering in private matters?

    • @franca9995
      @franca9995 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @ttt ttt how? Muslims almost account 10% of france population if we force our religion on every people in this country. France would be burning now

    • @khan-cricket
      @khan-cricket 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@aloukan5805 Don't take your private matters to the public place

    • @arandomperson1042
      @arandomperson1042 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Actually banning religious symbols, creates more divide and oppression instead of neutrality because religious people have a disadvantage, while atheists and non relgious people have the higher ground in terms of freedom because they do not subject themselves to religious rulings, but if france allowed religious symbols, nonreligious people would be still happy because they can wear their non religious attire which makes them comfortable and religious people can wear their religious attire which makes them comfortable. If public display of religion is banned, then so should public display of atheism, and one more thing,
      What is wrong with someone wearing religious symbols outside, they are not obstructing anyones space, they arent causing any inconvenience or hassle, its just a stupid law make because of stupid reasons.

    • @Lyallpuriya
      @Lyallpuriya 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@khan-cricket Sex is also a private matter! Don't take it to the public place.

  • @wandilande9628
    @wandilande9628 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    It is so funny and ironic
    French teach my ancestor about Jesus, but now almost entire french leave Jesus.

    • @sannestrijd2978
      @sannestrijd2978 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Okay, doesn’t matter though. Humans should evolve. The French have evolved in the right way.

    • @dragonsigma8611
      @dragonsigma8611 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Sanne Strijd and who tell you that they are moving to the better

    • @sufficientmagister9061
      @sufficientmagister9061 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@dragonsigma8611
      Religion is the opium of the masses.

    • @thegreatrestoration6784
      @thegreatrestoration6784 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sannestrijd2978 It will go back to the old way, just watch. France will return back to Catholicism.

    • @cL-bf2ug
      @cL-bf2ug 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thegreatrestoration6784
      Hopefully that is true.

  • @hiss9989
    @hiss9989 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    It’s both safeguarding freedoms and anti-religion, because of the nature of religion.

    • @CelticVictory
      @CelticVictory ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That really doesn't make sense.

  • @NathanPereira-lx9yc
    @NathanPereira-lx9yc ปีที่แล้ว +2

    france has to control islam state

  • @zeynepkucuk243
    @zeynepkucuk243 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    secularism will save the world!

    • @thegreatrestoration6784
      @thegreatrestoration6784 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Secularism will destroy the world!
      If the Church ruled everything, we wont have Nuclear bombs!

    • @arandomperson1042
      @arandomperson1042 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Are you sure about that, how about the impact of secularism being forced in muslim countries in the middle east.

    • @zeynepkucuk243
      @zeynepkucuk243 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@arandomperson1042 actually yes, that's why I'm sure. All the corrupted and worst regimes are held by religious ideas. Religion must be a private issue. It should not be implemented to public sphere.

    • @arandomperson1042
      @arandomperson1042 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@zeynepkucuk243 ok but whats your opinion on religious symbols/clothing pieces being worn in public spaces like parks, on the streets or public transport, if you are against it please explain how a piece of cloth which just happened to look a bit different to symbolize a certain faith interferes with the private life of others.

    • @user-my4lf4bx6v
      @user-my4lf4bx6v 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@arandomperson1042 Muslim countries were secular lmao,not that secular but they were nonetheless.
      Until the arab spring and the radical Islamists.

  • @NormandyFoye
    @NormandyFoye 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    A great idea that should be adopted by all modern societies or those ready to leave such primitive fears behind.

    • @aloukan5805
      @aloukan5805 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      hope not, people would have less freedom of choice in their personal life, as secularism is forced upon people. Secularists talking about religion being oppressive, and jet they are worse. What happened between the separation of state and religion and neutrality.

    • @sufficientmagister9061
      @sufficientmagister9061 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@aloukan5805
      You have a misunderstanding of secularism as the deluded, religious dogmatist that you are.

    • @CelticVictory
      @CelticVictory ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Your "primitive fears" are a part of you.

    • @here_we_go_again2571
      @here_we_go_again2571 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@aloukan5805
      Laïcité is separation of
      religion and state.
      One is not allowed to force
      one's religion/it's arbitrary
      dress codes upon the organs
      of the state -- Schools, the
      Civil service (while at school
      or work)
      *One can do what he/she*
      *wants on his own time --*
      Wear religious clothes, jewelry,
      pray, go to a place of worship.
      *In other words, religion is a*
      *private matter it does not*
      *belong in the institutions of*
      *the state!*
      Also, when one is an Olympic
      athlete representing France;
      one does not bring one's
      religion into the arena!

  • @EnigmaFox-qr2fw
    @EnigmaFox-qr2fw หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does France have cultural platforms for cultural events where Christianity is privileged? So the concept of laicite has Implicit religious biases towards Christianity but antagonist towards Islam.. so how is France so capable of enforcing laicite without too much criticism? Because the French Majority is Christian.. so laicite can effectively separate religion from public life , because public life is actually.... Christian! So the laicite concept asserted Christianity as the invisible cultural norm publicly while being practiced privately. Religious cultures not Christian cannot experience laicite, because they have no public power to experience their culture publicly.. laicite only recognizes Christianity as the invisible norm that is embedded in French institutions likely. So Christianity gets to be practiced invisibly yet publicly while Muslims have to practice visibly yet privately.. so laicite provides secular endorsement to christianity without needing to recognize religion publicly. The public is Christian and secular.. I guess French secularism sounds like it's still getting out of religion and religious biases.

  • @sannestrijd2978
    @sannestrijd2978 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Safeguarding freedoms!

    • @aloukan5805
      @aloukan5805 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      safeguard freedoms, by taking other freedoms away

    • @CelticVictory
      @CelticVictory ปีที่แล้ว

      Not so much.

  • @buddhachimp9226
    @buddhachimp9226 7 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Love you France, Laïcité makes so much sense
    . like usual, the French are ahead of the game.

    • @aloukan5805
      @aloukan5805 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      if taking freedoms of choice away from minorities, and forces an ideology on people.

    • @sufficientmagister9061
      @sufficientmagister9061 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@aloukan5805
      No, it does not, you religious dogmatist.

    • @thegreatrestoration6784
      @thegreatrestoration6784 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Makes no Sense at all.

    • @arandomperson1042
      @arandomperson1042 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@sufficientmagister9061 please explain, how is public display of religious wrong, how does a muslim woman wearing a headscarf or a sikh wearing a turban, or a Jewish man wearing a Yamukah somehow interfere public life, they are not obstructing anyones space, nor are they preaching and so what if its offensive to atheists isnt secularism about freedom of speech

    • @CelticVictory
      @CelticVictory ปีที่แล้ว

      Sure, but they're ahead in the race to be become a totalitarian state. As usual, the French are backing the wrong play.

  • @king-sal
    @king-sal 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Secularism IS their religion .. It's the same principle .. no one should force others to follow a specific "idea" .. whether this idea is religious or secular, doesn't matter It's all the same .. peace doesn't come from forcing others to follow your idea .. peace comes from the acceptance of differences between people, peace comes from freedom, peace comes from harmony and coexistence.

  • @patrickmcshane7658
    @patrickmcshane7658 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    What if you're having a bad hair day?

    • @ChrisBergernson-oe9zy
      @ChrisBergernson-oe9zy 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Go to thé good hairdresser .You Know thé social rule for life .
      When You 've got a date You are really elegant ...

    • @Dan-J0
      @Dan-J0 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You are allowed to wear hats, I don’t get the question..?

  • @theemperor4901
    @theemperor4901 ปีที่แล้ว

    Protect secularism France.

  • @suwaysfarah5317
    @suwaysfarah5317 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    They create secularism but
    They have law that made human in especially law makers
    While they left their book in religious
    Human has stupidity
    Later on they swear 🤣🤣 religious book

  • @Email-mu1mv
    @Email-mu1mv 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If France does it it's secularism, if an Asian country does it then its called by this same news station as antireligion.

    • @here_we_go_again2571
      @here_we_go_again2571 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      French secularism
      guarantees the public
      freedom from one
      group imposing its
      religion upon others.

  • @nafisfuadayon6832
    @nafisfuadayon6832 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    What is freedom to them?

    • @labranehit7687
      @labranehit7687 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What do you mean? (I'm French)

    • @super_nov2353
      @super_nov2353 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      In the "droits de l'homme et du citoyen", at the very first article, it says any citizen can do whatever he.she.they wants as long as long as he.she.they don't hurt or restrain other's Freedom ^^

    • @jerrymosso3380
      @jerrymosso3380 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@super_nov2353 ok i have a sincere question, are chains of the moon and sun, and of crosses, banned in public school or areas?

    • @LjuboCupic1912
      @LjuboCupic1912 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@jerrymosso3380 all of those are banned, they have been since the bill was first introduced in 1905. The French usually tend to view religion from a negative point of view due to centuries of economic and social stagnation they suffered from while being oppressed by the Catholic Church.

    • @lutssamiraluts6564
      @lutssamiraluts6564 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@super_nov2353 and in the respect of the law, their freedom are not only limited by the respect of others but also by the law so yes they cannot do anything they want but are still free for a lot of things

  • @CelticVictory
    @CelticVictory ปีที่แล้ว

    It's probably not the latter.

  • @ArcFoundationDirector
    @ArcFoundationDirector 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    ⚡️ Secularism/Ignoritism a Religion/Ideology it is.

    • @EXO_0fficial
      @EXO_0fficial 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      bro is speaking master yoda

    • @ArcFoundationDirector
      @ArcFoundationDirector 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@EXO_0fficial [Transcription of Rooted and Advanced Contemporary Alkebulan Wâ’lâf Language it is.]

    • @EXO_0fficial
      @EXO_0fficial 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ArcFoundationDirector what's that? (please tell me i am curious)

  • @salsapassion4life
    @salsapassion4life 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Laicite is so sacret, sounds like a relegion to me. Forcing other people your views of life is not freedom but oppression. Lacitee is not neutral, its a believe.its the right wing ideas that call for hate.

  • @iFreeThink
    @iFreeThink 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think everyone talks about a male relative.
    So a young adult who doesn't feel anything is really weird.
    Like they're a fat boss with slaves.

  • @anneeq008
    @anneeq008 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fascist is the most accurate word to describe it

    • @kebab3854
      @kebab3854 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      So France is facist since 1789 ? Before facism was even a thing?
      I'm always learning more everyday

    • @EXO_0fficial
      @EXO_0fficial 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @anneeq008
      you probably don't even know what fascism means

  • @sheikhsirajulhaq9897
    @sheikhsirajulhaq9897 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    RELIGION SAY WEAR CLOTHES IF UR RELIGIOUG WEAR CLOTHES OTHERWISE NO

    • @here_we_go_again2571
      @here_we_go_again2571 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      France is in northwestern
      Europe -- It is not in a warm
      climate. EVERYBODY wears
      clothes, even in the summer!

  • @tricPort
    @tricPort 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Laicité means islamism...demonstrated in Le Republic France

    • @Rick_Cleland
      @Rick_Cleland 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Allan's Snackbar?

    • @tricPort
      @tricPort 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      in France iu do not change the meaning of the word!!!??? Laicite is a Regime that have the tradition to cut heads to the Catolics and persecuted the Catholic comunities at the same time they are so sweet with the meccas

    • @aloukan5805
      @aloukan5805 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@tricPort Islam does not have the same history as the church, unfair to think the same way. Secularism forced upon people is that freedom. there is no neutrality when there is no choice.

    • @XDKnoori
      @XDKnoori 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@aloukan5805 .

    • @EXO_0fficial
      @EXO_0fficial 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@tricPortWTF?????
      Laïcité wasn't the reason the french decapitated the king's head 😂😂😂

  • @stoic.ascent
    @stoic.ascent 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love french designer brands but will not be buying anymore££££

    • @ChrisBergernson-oe9zy
      @ChrisBergernson-oe9zy 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I will not go in England again ? Because of what You Say ? Stop to think that péople are thé same liké You everywhere .

  • @aaronruss6331
    @aaronruss6331 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Frances secularism is too extreme. Politicians should be allowed to share there faith publicly as should teachers, students,public workers etc. There not forcing it on nobody,people sharing there faith publicly is a bestiful thing.

    • @ditne5661
      @ditne5661 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      the majority of French people would not agree with this because it is too inclusive and without critical minds you have no more reflections.

    • @kebab3854
      @kebab3854 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      French people would tell you that faith is a privatz matter, and as such, people represenring citizens shouldn't show their faith while in exercise

    • @viridia1526
      @viridia1526 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Your freedom definition is not the french majority definition of freedom but good try.

    • @aaronruss6331
      @aaronruss6331 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@ditne5661 What do you mean by critical minds? Can somebody not be religious and critical(of course this would depend to a certain degree on the religion)? Of course they can. I am Catholic but how would that effect my governance if I was in government?

    • @here_we_go_again2571
      @here_we_go_again2571 4 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      I do not want to hear about
      a politician's or YOUR religious
      faith/views -- Religion
      is a private matter.

  • @rafiqhpt3936
    @rafiqhpt3936 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Islam supar