Specific Factors Model

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 65

  • @chrisnew1494
    @chrisnew1494 5 ปีที่แล้ว +73

    you make much more sense than my econ professor

  • @RayemMaulen
    @RayemMaulen 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thank god!! You explain things really well!! You say more than my professor of world economy

  • @lr7619
    @lr7619 5 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Thank you! You are a gifted teacher-I finally understand this!

  • @annakang6941
    @annakang6941 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    You are helping me survive my semester. Thank you so much

    • @ChristianDG21
      @ChristianDG21 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I understand that feeling now.

  • @evacowley9515
    @evacowley9515 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Incredible, you managed to explain more clearly in less than an hour what my professor took two weeks to cover! (And written backwards to boot, legendary)

  • @jessiemayfield6749
    @jessiemayfield6749 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This was just more confusing and this was the best video TH-cam had, I’m cooked

  • @kkkkkkk5726
    @kkkkkkk5726 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love the way you make it so clearly and easy-understanding.

  • @annaarakelyan5421
    @annaarakelyan5421 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for everything that you do for students! With love from Russian students trying to understand this topics in Geneva!!

  • @zhidanwang6260
    @zhidanwang6260 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Such excellent and well-made videos!!!!!

  • @ulquiohime5694
    @ulquiohime5694 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you so much for making these videos!! Life saver

  • @cristina6665
    @cristina6665 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I have a test on this tomorrow and this video helped me soooo much god bless you sir

  • @zhangke3566
    @zhangke3566 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you very much! Excellent work. I will appreciate it if you could another video talking about Standard Trade Model

  • @adrianbrenescr
    @adrianbrenescr 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent video! Congratulations!

  • @user-hilary1213k
    @user-hilary1213k 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    You're ambidextrous...that's coool🤩🤩

  • @kamzzee
    @kamzzee 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks alot. You make this topic so easy to understand. Thanks alot.

  • @boburjonyoqubov547
    @boburjonyoqubov547 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    good explained theoritically, but would be better if you explain with numerical examples, for example how to find Ew or Eq

  • @brendanpeake4302
    @brendanpeake4302 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    this video was excellent. thank you for the upload

  • @chullachakthipphibal7473
    @chullachakthipphibal7473 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much for such an easy-understood explanation!

  • @gentiankuqica
    @gentiankuqica 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you so so much! You're amazing at explaining this.

  • @32459
    @32459 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    very well put together, very logical explanation, thanks!!

  • @dimpalsharma613
    @dimpalsharma613 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Little bit lengthy... but really useful and knowledge enhancing video👍🇮🇳

  • @pandabear4565
    @pandabear4565 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Glory to you, My good doctor

  • @Mango34562
    @Mango34562 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Greatest of All Time

  • @timz6198
    @timz6198 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    just amazing

  • @moza9835
    @moza9835 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    God bless you

  • @oguzhandogan7634
    @oguzhandogan7634 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love from Istanbul also

  • @kanikabagree1084
    @kanikabagree1084 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing explanation thankyouuu!

  • @halneufmille
    @halneufmille 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    In the last example at 45:30, shouldn't there be an increase in Q_M and L_M as well?

  • @dharmagyasingh4869
    @dharmagyasingh4869 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Helped me substantially!!!

  • @yijingzhang3671
    @yijingzhang3671 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent explanation!

  • @scottval2574
    @scottval2574 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    due to covid 19 and an increase in automation o How will the earning of labour and capital will be affected in the short (sf model) and long run(ho)?

  • @bilalsherani9960
    @bilalsherani9960 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good explanation

  • @KrDavidLee
    @KrDavidLee 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Question: In 38:15, capital is fixed but labor goes up. By definition, MPK has to go down when more laborers are looking to utilize capital. So why does he say that MPK goes up with the coming of more labor? Please help me!!!

    • @numannalbant7739
      @numannalbant7739 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      When more labor comes:
      L/K increases and MPL decreases, when inverse is taken:
      K/L decreases and MPK does what? Increases.
      He explains this part at the beginning, around min. 10

    • @mattjordan7817
      @mattjordan7817 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@numannalbant7739 When more people occupy the same amount of capital, the MPK must fall. Just think about it

    • @MrFunkyWarrior
      @MrFunkyWarrior ปีที่แล้ว

      No because capital is fixed so when you introduce all these new labourers production would benefit massively from new capital, thus MPK increases.

    • @MrFunkyWarrior
      @MrFunkyWarrior ปีที่แล้ว

      MPL decreases since more people occupy same amount of capital@@mattjordan7817

  • @wrednymaz
    @wrednymaz 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Superior stuff. Thank you,

  • @cristianperez5808
    @cristianperez5808 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    for the first graph what woudl be the y and x intercepts? that would help me a bunch, thanks great video!

  • @LiebermannFilms
    @LiebermannFilms 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    excellent video, but I ask myself how do you write mirror-inverted ?

    • @SItgix
      @SItgix 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      invert the whole video afterwards

  • @Matheus-fe7dt
    @Matheus-fe7dt 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lets say i want to apply the specific model to a country running a deficit such as USA. How do I use examples to fit in with this model?

  • @xavijohn5823
    @xavijohn5823 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    In 38:31,i think MPK should decrease instead of increase!right?labor increases,MPK decreases

    • @Reonnoer
      @Reonnoer 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, labor increases, MPK increases and r increases. But if labor increase MPL decreases

  • @gagarine42
    @gagarine42 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good video. But why not using the derivative of the production function with respect to L for MPL? Those triangles are confusing to me.

  • @aneeshssundaram1675
    @aneeshssundaram1675 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Professor, Aneesh from Singapore here. i am meaning to ask for Part 3 of the lecture, what does "W" in the numerical example represent, and how is it different from the WLm?

  • @viviancao9536
    @viviancao9536 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I hope that we can have you in University of Waterloo

  • @chemicalneonm
    @chemicalneonm ปีที่แล้ว

    Why would the MPK increase when introducing more labor to M? If there is more labor then K is less productive, then the MPK would become smaller. This is on min 37:55

  • @chengchi1728
    @chengchi1728 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I hope we can have you at UC Berkeley

  • @anija212
    @anija212 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    At the minute 41:00, you say labor has moved from agriculture to manufacturing, whereas it seems its the contrary...could you please explain?

  • @lessonsarchived8527
    @lessonsarchived8527 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you.🇧🇩

  • @alperennozcan
    @alperennozcan ปีที่แล้ว

    He said ''iPod''...We are getting older...

  • @老派青年
    @老派青年 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You save me thank you so much!

  • @mustafabahbah5114
    @mustafabahbah5114 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much

  • @조은서학부재학식품자
    @조은서학부재학식품자 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How the heck are you writing everything backwards??

  • @jamesmettle2
    @jamesmettle2 ปีที่แล้ว

    🎉🎉🎉🎉

  • @godwinkatemi5157
    @godwinkatemi5157 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks

  • @mattjordan7817
    @mattjordan7817 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    9:40 and 38:20 When more and more people occupy the same amount of capital, the MPK must fall. I understand your logic, but it is wrong

  • @sergiodtr
    @sergiodtr ปีที่แล้ว

    Did someone else noticed that he is ambidextrous?