This is the Scene of the film "First Man(2018)", and I compared it with actual real life video footage which have recorded in 1969. #FirstMan #Apollo11 #Spaceprogram
I love the fact that many of the shorts in the film were original pieces of historical footage with digital scene extension and with some clean up added in.
@@benjaminfinlay829 the shot at 2:42 for example, in the film that is the real footage with additional smoke/pyro effects and scene extension digitally added. But the core of the shot in the film is the actual cleaned up original film. It's an absolutely stunning shot.
What surprised me in First Man was how noisy the vehicles were. From the X-15 onward, with moans, creaks,rattles and bangs, the vehicles sounded like they were about to fall apart.
The Apollo astronauts often commented about how gentle the Saturn V was to ride. Compared to the converted ICBMs they'd ridden in the Mercury and Gemini programs, it was a Rolls Royce.
@@Surya_Virya 1. The Apollo 1 disaster was a fire in the command capsule during a test a month before launch. It had nothing to do with the rocket that wasn't even fueled. 2. Apollo 1 wasn't going to be launched with a Saturn V. It was a Saturn 1B. 3. The Saturn 1B rocket that was intended to be used during Apollo 1 was eventually repurposed for Apollo 5 and launched a year later. During which it performed without any significant issues.
to be fair the movie didnt require much movie making. they just needed some good actors (which they got). script was pre-prepared all they had to do was stick to it. i am not an american, wasn't born then - couldn't care less. this is the original superhero movie. beats all avengers movies imho. ♥
I promise you are not a prisoner of gravity anymore than the planet itself is. You're not trapped on Earth, you're part of Earth- and it's a space vessel we are travelling through the universe at unfathomable speed- it is relativity through gravity that keep us all together.
Beautifully accurate. The staging was perfect! All the details. I just wish everything wasn’t so dark in this movie. It was more of a sunny day for the actual launch. Either way, this puts the Apollo 13 launch to shame. I know that it’s early CGI, and was impressive (and still is), but they didn’t even paint the rocket right!
Although I wasn't born when the original manned mission to the moon took place, this scene brings me to tears when the rocket breaks through the exhaust cloud and I guess for the spectators on that day it had that same effect for many x100.
Only other soundtracks that gave me the feels on par with this scene is when Superman destroys the World Engine in Man of Steel and when Elias is still alive and trying to make it to the retreating troops on the choppers in Platoon and I guess also the final attack scene in We Were Soldiers. Honorable mention The Thin Red Line when Jim Caviezel leads the enemy away. There's honestly too many amazing climactic scenes with excellent scores to hit home in the moment in too many movies to count but those I mentioned are some of the top right up there with this one in my books!
The launches in this movie were just so intense and from what I have read (and seen here) pretty darn accurate. The Gemini launch was something else. That thing sounded like it was literally flying into hell. In the Apollo launch footage probably my favorite shot, both the real one and the movie) is when they say ‘we have a liftoff’ and the rocket appears out of the smoke. I can’t even imagine what this must have been like to see live.
Well, it is possible to see a Starship launch now. Starship is even bigger than Saturn-V was, so I guess that counts. It burns methane instead of a kerosene though, so far less smoke. The second stage burns methane instead of hydrogen, so stage separation don't look as cool.
Ouf!!!! I was holding my breath the whole time! I know they make it but showing Armstrong's point of view and emotions next to the actual images makes you wonder what goes through a man's head while going on these kind of missions. ❤
The interstage separating between first S-I stage and the second S-IIA stage shots were not from Apollo 11, the documentary, TV movie (the one with Matt Frewer playing Gene Krantz), nor the actual launch. Only Apollo 4, the first all-up test of the Saturn V booster assembly had cameras aboard that shot the separations and were dropped to fall with parachutes into the ocean for retrieval. Weight was an absolute necessity for manned launches, and so the stage separations seen here are all from Apollo 4.
I find it laughable that there are people who believe that the moon landing was faked.... but watching the movie, and seeing the side by side (not including the parts that were taken from historical footage) you can CLEARLY SEE a difference in what was CGI. Shouts out to the Apollo 11 crew!!! 💪🏿💪🏿💪🏿
One thing that is clear, by 2:43, the movie shows how that huge explosion of powerful ignition looks like it were a nuclear detonation, that then just lights up the surrounding areas as if it were a second sun. And I have been told by several that it does light up a night sky as if it were full daylight. Clearly is not the case in real life footage, however, the movie makes it so that you feel that it was like the will of all one people going at the extreme limits and exploding upwards in a pillar of flame, carrying the hopes of possibly all mankind (or humanity).
SLS did that on Artemis 1 two years ago. Probably the first time a rocket has been bright enough launching from Kennedy to have the same effect since the Saturn V. Blinding light. That's why it always looks like night in the close up shots because they have to turn the exposure way down to even see the flames.
Maybe there was a administrative error when writing the script, that they launched at 9:30 PM when in fact it was 9:30 AM and it was missed during production so they just went with it
First Man could have been a really superb film if it focused more on the space parts. Those were fantastic. The family drama was meh and resulted in the space parts being rushed (even in KSP I dont dock as fast as those dudes did with the CSM and LM). But the visuals and the details were stunning
This movie makes a good effort, good special effects and great music. However there’s lots of things that don’t add up, like they climb into the command module and they immediately shut them in, no goodbyes or good luck or anything, then immediately they say T-Minus 2 minutes ( I bet the ground crew had to run away pretty fast). Also Neil is portrayed as being angry all the time, whats the deal with that?
The time lapse is for cinematic purposes, obviously. And while they oversold it a bit (again, for dramatic effect, I'm sure), Armstrong was a notoriously "frosty" individual, even amongst a group that was itself rather cold and mission-focused. All business all the time (at least publicly, and it seems to have been generally true privately, as well). As amazing as the kinetic scenes are, I thought the exploration of his "warrior ethos" psyche (and the cost of it to his family) was even more impressive. Men of that generation, type, and origin didn't sit around for ten minutes back-slapping and crying, they strapped in and got on with it.
The saturn v coming out of the dark clouds represents human kind leaving the dark ages behind and is also kind of metaphor for all the sacrifices that were made to get humans to the moon
They call ignition sequence start at 8/9, so they technically begin startup at that time, but you’re right they don’t really fire up until five or six seconds. They definitely use multiple shots to make the launch last longer, but they were all done with beautiful accuracy! Hell, all the old Saturn videos were usually played in slow mo anyway
Fuel flow and the pumps pumping it begin at minus eight seconds, and the flames start later, and the 'zero' is really when full power has begun and 'lift-off' has occurred. The bit that amazed me about the Apollo 11 documentary was that nearly 100 tons of fuel had been burned before that rocket had travelled it's own length.
An internet search like 'when was the first colour film made', or 'when was the first colour movie made' would help enormously. It's an interesting thing to learn, especially about how many different ways it was done. Agfacolor, Dufaycolour, Technicolor, etc. My best wishes.
If you pause at 3:08 it is briefly visible, however it does seem most of the shots where it was clearly visible irl are intentionally not focused on that at all for some reason, like at 3:04, there is a closeup of the USA on the real thing, but the movie just shows a wet screen with the engine exhaust
@@technoquetz126The wet screen was from one of the many other cameras shooting the lift-off. The scenes do not match, as the movie used a different original camera's film as a source, one that had water on the panel protecting the camera. It's like the style decision to have ice and water droplets on every window in every aircraft or spacecraft in this film, even though the actual windows were all carefully designed to not freeze or mist up, for the obvious reason that people might want to see where they were going. The director's decisions meant that obscurity was the norm in 'First Man', usually through vibration, though this was rarely noticed to happen on Saturn Vs, or on the X-15 or Gemini craft, both were remarkably stable machines compared to some that have been flown. The boosters used to get the Gemini craft into orbit were adapted ICBMs, and had a pretty rough ride, with more G's, to boot.
I didn’t like that the film, First Man showed the a dark gloomy launch time. Apollo 11 actually took off at 9:30 am, on a brilliant sunny, summer Florida morning.
![พบรัก - INK WARUNTORN x FELLOW FELLOW [LIVE SESSION]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1VonHhP6_Y8/mqdefault.jpg)
I love the fact that many of the shorts in the film were original pieces of historical footage with digital scene extension and with some clean up added in.
I _think_ they were actually recreations, but _man_ did they do a superlative job in essentially matching it frame-to-frame.
@@benjaminfinlay829 Nah, there was some real footage. They took some from a few different missions, though, not just 11.
@@benjaminfinlay829 the shot at 2:42 for example, in the film that is the real footage with additional smoke/pyro effects and scene extension digitally added. But the core of the shot in the film is the actual cleaned up original film. It's an absolutely stunning shot.
IIRC the shot of the Saturn V from the elevator is real but from a mission other than Apollo 11
I noticed that too 😵💫😵💫😵💫
What surprised me in First Man was how noisy the vehicles were. From the X-15 onward, with moans, creaks,rattles and bangs, the vehicles sounded like they were about to fall apart.
The Apollo astronauts often commented about how gentle the Saturn V was to ride.
Compared to the converted ICBMs they'd ridden in the Mercury and Gemini programs, it was a Rolls Royce.
@@stevetheduck1425like the Apollo 1?
It was over exaggerated to add exhilaration effect.
@@Surya_Virya 1. The Apollo 1 disaster was a fire in the command capsule during a test a month before launch. It had nothing to do with the rocket that wasn't even fueled.
2. Apollo 1 wasn't going to be launched with a Saturn V. It was a Saturn 1B.
3. The Saturn 1B rocket that was intended to be used during Apollo 1 was eventually repurposed for Apollo 5 and launched a year later. During which it performed without any significant issues.
I know it was unrealistic, but I loved it because it emphasized how the vehicles were man made contraptions.
Seeing this side-by-side and the accuracy in the movie gave me chills!
to be fair the movie didnt require much movie making. they just needed some good actors (which they got). script was pre-prepared all they had to do was stick to it. i am not an american, wasn't born then - couldn't care less. this is the original superhero movie. beats all avengers movies imho. ♥
@@parthopdas Yes, a true testament of our capabilities and how much we have advanced in technology in less than a century.
do NOT watch this in default video - double click it for full-screen mode. Awesome stuff!
Indeed yes indeed 🤛🏾👍🇺🇸
In this case, art imitated life. Kudos to the First Man film-makers for tapping into the event in such a moving and visceral way.
Wow. I didn't realise how many shots were taken directly from the original footage. Just makes the scene even more stunning.
This is the reason why it got the Oscars for the best visual effects on 2019
Well done. I was born a prisoner of gravity, never to experience that. But the sound of those F-1’s still gets me to this day.
I promise you are not a prisoner of gravity anymore than the planet itself is. You're not trapped on Earth, you're part of Earth- and it's a space vessel we are travelling through the universe at unfathomable speed- it is relativity through gravity that keep us all together.
Do you mind if I use that? “prisoner of gravity?”
@@GumballAstronaut7206 Go for it - it's from the Bruce Dickenson song, "Re-Entry".
When that Saturn hits Max Q, God it brings tears to the eyes. Amazing video.
That's not max q because max q is not that close to staging max q is 75 seconds staging is about 165 seconds
@@commanderinchiefv1nce141 someone clearly hasn't watched the original apollo 11 launch 😐
@@bruhboyb3812 I have lol but they make max q to close to staging in the movie
@@commanderinchiefv1nce141 because it’s a movie…they’re obviously not gonna put the entire launch in and max q is visually appealing so that’s why
@@bruhboyb3812 you are ture about I am sorry and have a nice day
Beautifully accurate. The staging was perfect! All the details. I just wish everything wasn’t so dark in this movie. It was more of a sunny day for the actual launch.
Either way, this puts the Apollo 13 launch to shame. I know that it’s early CGI, and was impressive (and still is), but they didn’t even paint the rocket right!
Wonderful, a great comparison and it shows great historical accuracy in the film.
Although I wasn't born when the original manned mission to the moon took place, this scene brings me to tears when the rocket breaks through the exhaust cloud and I guess for the spectators on that day it had that same effect for many x100.
4:13 dios que hermoso se ve el cohete,es simplemente una maravilla de la ingeniería
The noise of a rocket never fails to impress as it rips through the sky that noise is like being in the speaker at a Motorhead gig
I can't get tired of the scene
As I lived through watching the real event on TV, I found this particularly interesting for and the movie certainly got it spot on!
If Armstrong were still with us... I wonder what he would've thought of this movie.
Probably wondered why it makes him out to be a depressed mofo
Man, that is so extremely well put together and timed; thank you for doing that!
The soundtrack is a masterpiece! It's out of this world. 😉❤
Only other soundtracks that gave me the feels on par with this scene is when Superman destroys the World Engine in Man of Steel and when Elias is still alive and trying to make it to the retreating troops on the choppers in Platoon and I guess also the final attack scene in We Were Soldiers. Honorable mention The Thin Red Line when Jim Caviezel leads the enemy away. There's honestly too many amazing climactic scenes with excellent scores to hit home in the moment in too many movies to count but those I mentioned are some of the top right up there with this one in my books!
I can't believe how accurate the movie was to the source material! The Saturn V rocket is one of the most awesome vehicles ever built by Man! 🚀
Quite possibly the best film I have ever seen!
Cool movie!... Buzz Aldrin speak for an hour here in NZ in 2010 about his experience as an astronaut .. Thanks from NZ 👍🇳🇿
одно из самых больших событий для человечества
Really great composite, great work bringing both sets of footage together.
Extremely well done. I'm impressed. The editing in this video is top notch. This is something to be proud of.
Imagine getting strapped in to that coffin at the top? Lord, these were a different breed of men.
Plenty of folks today would fight for a chance to ride in such vehicle
The launches in this movie were just so intense and from what I have read (and seen here) pretty darn accurate. The Gemini launch was something else. That thing sounded like it was literally flying into hell. In the Apollo launch footage probably my favorite shot, both the real one and the movie) is when they say ‘we have a liftoff’ and the rocket appears out of the smoke. I can’t even imagine what this must have been like to see live.
Well, it is possible to see a Starship launch now.
Starship is even bigger than Saturn-V was, so I guess that counts.
It burns methane instead of a kerosene though, so far less smoke.
The second stage burns methane instead of hydrogen, so stage separation don't look as cool.
Ouf!!!! I was holding my breath the whole time! I know they make it but showing Armstrong's point of view and emotions next to the actual images makes you wonder what goes through a man's head while going on these kind of missions. ❤
The interstage separating between first S-I stage and the second S-IIA stage shots were not from Apollo 11, the documentary, TV movie (the one with Matt Frewer playing Gene Krantz), nor the actual launch.
Only Apollo 4, the first all-up test of the Saturn V booster assembly had cameras aboard that shot the separations and were dropped to fall with parachutes into the ocean for retrieval.
Weight was an absolute necessity for manned launches, and so the stage separations seen here are all from Apollo 4.
I find it laughable that there are people who believe that the moon landing was faked.... but watching the movie, and seeing the side by side (not including the parts that were taken from historical footage) you can CLEARLY SEE a difference in what was CGI. Shouts out to the Apollo 11 crew!!! 💪🏿💪🏿💪🏿
Underrated film
Wow. This is about the coolest thing I've seen in a long time. Thank you for posting.
What a monstrous machine
The Saturn V was a serious beast of a machine!
What an amazing video! Thanks for sharing ❤
The first man on the moon and apollo 13, for me the 2 best movies about space
Beautiful!!!
Wow, just wow. Well done.
US made 👊🏾🙌🏾 God bless this great country of ours 🇺🇸
One thing that is clear, by 2:43, the movie shows how that huge explosion of powerful ignition looks like it were a nuclear detonation, that then just lights up the surrounding areas as if it were a second sun. And I have been told by several that it does light up a night sky as if it were full daylight.
Clearly is not the case in real life footage, however, the movie makes it so that you feel that it was like the will of all one people going at the extreme limits and exploding upwards in a pillar of flame, carrying the hopes of possibly all mankind (or humanity).
SLS did that on Artemis 1 two years ago. Probably the first time a rocket has been bright enough launching from Kennedy to have the same effect since the Saturn V. Blinding light. That's why it always looks like night in the close up shots because they have to turn the exposure way down to even see the flames.
Maybe there was a administrative error when writing the script, that they launched at 9:30 PM when in fact it was 9:30 AM and it was missed during production so they just went with it
Perfeito....Perfect
Never seen that white room footage before, that’s fantastic
Should give the Apollo 11 documentary credit. Incredible film
1969: 16mm film 2018: Various cine-focal lengths.
Not.....35 mm film used for lift off for apollo program ,not all cameras ....
@@EMDFAST 16mm for astronauts. 35mm for ground based cinematography.
@@arricammarques1955 exact .....
That fact that they actually took this movie, and made it into a real thing, is absolutly epic.
Love it! 👌
First Man could have been a really superb film if it focused more on the space parts. Those were fantastic. The family drama was meh and resulted in the space parts being rushed (even in KSP I dont dock as fast as those dudes did with the CSM and LM).
But the visuals and the details were stunning
4:30 even the sound barrier wall looks cool
One of the greatest movies about the space race and exciting time to be growing up in America.
The only thing they got wrong was the speed, the saturn V lifted of *VERY* slowly from the ground, much much slower than the first man launch
This movie makes a good effort, good special effects and great music. However there’s lots of things that don’t add up, like they climb into the command module and they immediately shut them in, no goodbyes or good luck or anything, then immediately they say T-Minus 2 minutes ( I bet the ground crew had to run away pretty fast).
Also Neil is portrayed as being angry all the time, whats the deal with that?
The time lapse is for cinematic purposes, obviously. And while they oversold it a bit (again, for dramatic effect, I'm sure), Armstrong was a notoriously "frosty" individual, even amongst a group that was itself rather cold and mission-focused. All business all the time (at least publicly, and it seems to have been generally true privately, as well). As amazing as the kinetic scenes are, I thought the exploration of his "warrior ethos" psyche (and the cost of it to his family) was even more impressive. Men of that generation, type, and origin didn't sit around for ten minutes back-slapping and crying, they strapped in and got on with it.
2 people failed their astronaut training.
3, 2, 1, blastoff!
What a moving story and sound...
that was awesome!!!!!
Egyptians built the obelisks, Americans built the Saturn V.
Pretty awesome! 😉👍🏽
Flat Earth substainers like this content
Titanic: Hey Saturn V, how can you send humans to moon?
Saturn V: Cuz I have Lunar Module
Titanic: K
when the engines so powerful that the top of the thrust flame is so bright its black and not white 3:05
Great job!
Simply epic
Amazing and just so inspiring
I will have to check this out...
🌎.
1:40
Hehe, "I wonder where Guenter Wendt."
Why in the movie does the sky look more cloudy and dark?
Because it’s Hollywood and it makes it more dramatic
@@technoquetz126 Blast holly stinkin wood!
The saturn v coming out of the dark clouds represents human kind leaving the dark ages behind and is also kind of metaphor for all the sacrifices that were made to get humans to the moon
@@danielmadera1144 but it wasn't dark in real life
The apollo doesn’t ignite at 8-7-6 it ignites after 6-5
They call ignition sequence start at 8/9, so they technically begin startup at that time, but you’re right they don’t really fire up until five or six seconds.
They definitely use multiple shots to make the launch last longer, but they were all done with beautiful accuracy! Hell, all the old Saturn videos were usually played in slow mo anyway
Fuel flow and the pumps pumping it begin at minus eight seconds, and the flames start later, and the 'zero' is really when full power has begun and 'lift-off' has occurred.
The bit that amazed me about the Apollo 11 documentary was that nearly 100 tons of fuel had been burned before that rocket had travelled it's own length.
De las mejores películas que he visto ❤
wow perfect.
stunning
Amazing to see
I'm genuinely surprised that the orginal footage had colours in it.
An internet search like 'when was the first colour film made', or 'when was the first colour movie made' would help enormously.
It's an interesting thing to learn, especially about how many different ways it was done.
Agfacolor, Dufaycolour, Technicolor, etc. My best wishes.
Yeet to the moon!
great job!
I feel as if they ruined those clips by adding too much special effects
Today I will be the Third Man on the Moon
Pretty crazy super heavy is 2x almost 2.5x that strong.
The USA lettering is noticeably absent in the First Man footage.
Umm. No it isn't. Hell, 4:33.
If you pause at 3:08 it is briefly visible, however it does seem most of the shots where it was clearly visible irl are intentionally not focused on that at all for some reason, like at 3:04, there is a closeup of the USA on the real thing, but the movie just shows a wet screen with the engine exhaust
@@technoquetz126The wet screen was from one of the many other cameras shooting the lift-off.
The scenes do not match, as the movie used a different original camera's film as a source, one that had water on the panel protecting the camera.
It's like the style decision to have ice and water droplets on every window in every aircraft or spacecraft in this film, even though the actual windows were all carefully designed to not freeze or mist up, for the obvious reason that people might want to see where they were going.
The director's decisions meant that obscurity was the norm in 'First Man', usually through vibration, though this was rarely noticed to happen on Saturn Vs, or on the X-15 or Gemini craft, both were remarkably stable machines compared to some that have been flown.
The boosters used to get the Gemini craft into orbit were adapted ICBMs, and had a pretty rough ride, with more G's, to boot.
And I did not know what did the radio communications say
I need to see this movie from this clip I need to see this it looks good
I didn’t like that the film, First Man showed the a dark gloomy launch time. Apollo 11 actually took off at 9:30 am, on a brilliant sunny, summer Florida morning.
Thats actually not correct because the darkness you see is because of the ISO of the cameras.
The contrast between the bright plume and the sky
Fake. The one on the left was clearly filmed in a Hollywood studio.
Nice one lmao
watching this i simply deny the idea that this should all have been a fake as some people nowadays believe
Epic
😅😅😅😅😅😅well information good show 😅😅
Do I have to have seen Apollo 13 to understand what happens?
No. Apollo 13 is a movie to watch to see how NOT to get to the Moon.
Funny how one of the moon landing missions in the Apollo program was on the unluckiest number
@@PH03NX314Apollo 13 was one of three Apollo missions to the moon that did not land. Apollo 8, 10 and 13.
@@stevetheduck1425 was 8 the one where they were testing the LEM in LEO? I’m also pretty sure 10 was where they orbited the moon.
ฉันว่าพวกแกคิดเอาเองทั้งนั้นฉันยังไม่รู้เลยว่าฉันจะไปไหนมีแต่พวกแกเท่านั้นที่จินตนาการจัดนู่นแต่งนี่ทำตามอำเภอใจ
Took that usa off
Stop looking at the damn moon! Do your job, talk! Lol
Wow, hat tip to BOTH directors, Chazelle and Kubrick!
Kubrick?
th-cam.com/video/tNbeN_V_NNw/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/RK3Jnl6Zyhk/w-d-xo.html
😂
2:08
This staging
Why that year has 69
시발 존나 멋있어 ㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷ
Oh my god what an amazing edit! Probably easy to do but thank you. Such a nice mix of audio!
Mukemmel
almost the same ;-;
진짜 똑같이 했네
Foller