Top 10 Military Technologies of 2024

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 พ.ค. 2024
  • As the boundaries of what we thought was possible continue to expand, so does the realm of military technology. This constantly evolving field holds immense significance, playing a pivotal role in shaping global security and defense strategies. Today, we turn our focus to the future of warfare, exploring the top 10 military technologies of 2023. These breakthrough innovations stand at the forefront of human ingenuity, ready to redefine the theatres of conflict and peacekeeping.
    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
    📌 Stay connected with us
    Facebook - bit.ly/3N8S1yn
    Instagram - bit.ly/4425Kh0
    TikTok - bit.ly/43XaIM4
    📩Email: militarytrends@yahoo.com
    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
    💥Want more? Check out...
    👉Playlist - Military Power Comparison
    • Military Power Comparison
    👉Playlist - Our Favorites
    • Most Popular Videos
    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
    ⚠️ Please do NOT download or redistribute the content found on this channel.
    #militarytrends #top10 #technology #usmilitary #warefare #military #army #soldier #fypyoutube #fyp #futuristic

ความคิดเห็น • 79

  • @MilitaryTrends
    @MilitaryTrends  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    💥Want more? Check out...
    👉10 Most Advanced Military Technologies Still in Development
    th-cam.com/video/3sc4lfFlxEU/w-d-xo.html
    👉Playlist of our Favorites
    th-cam.com/play/PL5L8UXCrztmyClI9BsztJ5LyNkiKoMAis.html

    • @886535
      @886535 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The studies shown in the videos are still in the development stage, not even at the stage of acceptance into the military inventory. Therefore, it is also unknown how useful these tools will be in a war. You're doing a show with trailers right now, but the realities of the battlefield are different. 2. The United States, which has not been victorious in any war despite all advanced combat technology except World War II, has not fought with an opposing army equivalent to its strength since that day. He has still not overcome the Vietnam syndrome, and for this reason, the US army cannot take risks in the field despite its technology.
      They are also making improvements in other countries in many of the technologies shown in the videos. How much do you guys know about all this? How long has it been since you've been away from international military technology fairs?

    • @melanieenmats
      @melanieenmats 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Really all big powers (paraphrased)"are developing hypersonic missiles".
      How even? One nation among those is producing and using them consistently in battle now, the Khinzal which is destroying patriot systems etc. Meanwhile the US has no working model.
      Bit of a misrepresentation there on your part.

  • @user-tm5cj8vb6r
    @user-tm5cj8vb6r 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The relentless pursuit of innovation in military technology is what keeps our armed forces at the forefront. This commitment to advancement ensures that our troops have the best tools at their disposal, increasing their effectiveness and safety.

  • @gigawattbeehot0913
    @gigawattbeehot0913 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Interesting so much .

  • @fidaneliyeva2109
    @fidaneliyeva2109 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wow. that's really great 👍🏻. Defence technology is developing apace

  • @AyoRabiu-ss9fr
    @AyoRabiu-ss9fr 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good

  • @user-mx8qf4vq1k
    @user-mx8qf4vq1k 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Beautiful...remember shield of the father the mother...

  • @phettywappharmaceuticalsll8842
    @phettywappharmaceuticalsll8842 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    :50 is me walking into my job on Monday

    • @FTFD_4LiFe
      @FTFD_4LiFe 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nah, thats me trying to walk through my kids' room 😂

  • @litorivera6374
    @litorivera6374 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wow nice

  • @StormyNatero-yd7sj
    @StormyNatero-yd7sj 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I do read Technical manuals and safety regulations.

  • @Ingodwetrust52546
    @Ingodwetrust52546 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Wont be long till our enemies see US terminators coming at them looking like the movies

    • @epope98
      @epope98 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@user-tl1ef1hb1lbecause of training you only need a few people who are trained to use them, most for scouting so it would be a cav scout or a radioman

    • @TheMusan970
      @TheMusan970 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      dude with your current situation in your country you guys dont need any enemies 😂😂😂

  • @BerzerkerRob
    @BerzerkerRob 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Need to start producing more of those unmanned lightweight ground vehicles that can act as a mobile javelin /chain gun/missiles/ whatever the hell gets rid of the enemy with out our boys getting hurt I don't know why we haven't I heard of a
    Light tank but it's not really what I'm talking about

  • @lazarusblackwell6988
    @lazarusblackwell6988 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Laserrrrrrrrrrrrrsssssssssss

  • @user-qr5vb3vm6e
    @user-qr5vb3vm6e 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Imagine the robot has hammer fists, and elbows,knees and feet. With the points and places to hit once then hit target B and reduce the fight seine at the bar,to a pile of hurting humans on the floor. Gravity works..

  • @kevinthorne9892
    @kevinthorne9892 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There are 3 Natural Resources that Can be Used to Assist the Armour Protection of Tanks Etc...

  • @kentgladden4316
    @kentgladden4316 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The moment an object goes supersonic... "stealth" is gone. Sonic booms suck like that. Brings me to what you didn't mention. The Starlink constellation. Pretty sure using sonic boom data, they could track most anything traveling >Mach 1.0.

    • @jaimearredondo787
      @jaimearredondo787 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s my understanding that the F-22 has supercruise which is traveling at supersonic speeds while being stealthy of up to Mach 1.8.
      It’s true max speed is Mach 2.25 but this requires an afterburner.
      The F-22 doesn’t lose any speed.

    • @dirge44
      @dirge44 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It is still stealthy until impact. Like a bullet fired from a sniper, you wouldnt hear the shot until after the bullet hits or passes you

    • @BrunoZay
      @BrunoZay 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yeah, what @@dirge44 said. I was thinking- is @kentgladden4316 dumb, or what?

  • @Iamlostboy.
    @Iamlostboy. 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If this is what we know, imagine what's still classified 😳

  • @aamirmunawwarsultanah8653
    @aamirmunawwarsultanah8653 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    COME ALL IN LIR P PK BY SAYYAD AAMIR

  • @user-sg6ce3tx7s
    @user-sg6ce3tx7s หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What if ai decides to go rogue....

  • @grahamjohnbarr
    @grahamjohnbarr 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I have just had a navel gazing thought. When looking for signals from outer space, the new idea is to have multiple smaller disks co-0rdinated to pinpoint whatever they are looking for.
    Military Radar looking for incoming threats use a single Radar mounted on a heavy truck is very vulnerable.
    Would a number of smaller vehicles, each with a smaller disk which could be highly mobile be less vulnerable. They could be coordinated, like the small space radar disks, to achieve the same result as a single large Radar.

  • @namtang4499
    @namtang4499 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Finally 800 billions $ go right

  • @user-sg6ce3tx7s
    @user-sg6ce3tx7s หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bunkers,run,.......lol

  • @user-sg6ce3tx7s
    @user-sg6ce3tx7s หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What if ai is building a army for itself ...what will humans do????

    • @heaty007
      @heaty007 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Depart from the earth

  • @janiss5634
    @janiss5634 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2nd one listed is what ISREAL is using so much🙂🤣humans is popping out holes 30 ft away with RPG. In video it appears the tank is blown up but if the video continues you see this weapon is used in many cases

  • @epope98
    @epope98 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Did they use the robot comedy cgi skit in the intro

  • @Allyourbase1990
    @Allyourbase1990 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was a grunt in the Marines and we got all the BS equipment the Army didn’t want anymore 😂😂😂😂

  • @hondadee-zw9fl
    @hondadee-zw9fl 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One rpg finish...lol

  • @redhandedreviews3482
    @redhandedreviews3482 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I wonder if you coat a missile with a mirror like coating if it will reflect the laser and make it immune to lasers..

    • @phettywappharmaceuticalsll8842
      @phettywappharmaceuticalsll8842 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Damn bro sounds simple enough to work lol

    • @bowers_bruh6707
      @bowers_bruh6707 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I would like to believe that they've thought about that

    • @redhandedreviews3482
      @redhandedreviews3482 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bowers_bruh6707 well general milley doesn't seem to be the most confident nor any part of biden's administration so... They probably have mirrors and dressing rooms in the military but the way the military's been going it would be a waste to put a mirror on a rocket ....you can't look at yourself or dye your hair funky ass colors..

  • @militarygeneration7
    @militarygeneration7 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What's?
    military generation

  • @mukhtar5183
    @mukhtar5183 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mercava active defense is working properly in GAZA 🤣

  • @Tsunami20246
    @Tsunami20246 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Weapons in the street can be any shape in every street like statue and trees and banc and chair of stone and luster in the street and screen abs and wall and why not trafic lights also will be provide its energie from power electricty in the street its work turn on and off will be by remote control and programmation thechnologic

  • @jpallen719
    @jpallen719 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How about we come up new and different ways of learning peace…… war has speckled human history since it’s dawn…… seems like every cutting edge Technology has turned into an implement for destruction and killing.

  • @2Sage-7Poets
    @2Sage-7Poets 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    aps on tanks looks not working in ukraine.. so nope..

  • @jasons44
    @jasons44 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    N.k?

  • @IsraelMilitaryChannel
    @IsraelMilitaryChannel 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Military Tier list:
    S: USA(All of its wars were fought more than 10,000 km away crossing oceans. King of logistics. Largest air force in the world, power projection, largest fleet of carriers in the world, the most advance military on the planet. The US military is the only military on earth which is capable of bringing its army to any part of the world to wage war be it crossing oceans).
    A: UK(Finest soldiers, well trained, naval power projection), France, Israel(Lacks Navy and size, but Israeli technology is on a different level because of innovation. Arguably the best fighter pilots in the world, The Israeli Air Force has a historical kill ratio of over 19:1. The Israeli Air Force has shot down almost 600 enemy planes (including 5 Soviet MiGs in one 3-minute dogfight with zero losses. Israel could possibly beat the UK or France in ground and aerial war if hypothetically were beside one another but will very likely lose in naval battles. UK and France have power projection, both of them have the capability to wage war far and beyond their region while Israel is only regional.)
    B+: Russia(If we consider Russia's nuclear stockpile, it belong to second only to the US in terms of overall military power. Lacks power projection), China(Manufacturing power, large army, lacks power projection. Its mass produced cheap drones will cause a whole lot of problems for adversaries. Has the world's largest and most diverse arsenal of land based conventional missiles. Has the Largest army and navy in the world), India(Large army, mountain warfare specialty, however lacks power projection), Japan(Treaty restriction, technology prowess), South Korea(Its technology is to be reckoned with.)
    B: Turkey(Probably belong to lower end B+, drone power, produces its own capable military hardwares. Second largest standing military force in NATO), Italy(builds well known quality warships), Poland(Soon to have the most powerful land army in Europe), Brazil, Spain, Taiwan, Greece, Germany(Potential of being higher), Australia(Military size is small, but well trained and equipped with advance weaponry), Canada(Well trained army but lacks the size)
    C: Ukraine(Bravery10/10, S tier. Currently has the best guerilla warfare), Finland(Fought the Soviet and loss only 25,904 troops while the Soviet loss 126,875-167,976 troops. Western Europe's strongest artillery force), Sweden(Known for its silent diesel-electric submarines), Pakistan(Here only because of nukes should probably be higher for the same reason. Without nukes it belongs to D)
    D: Iran(Iran is durable, war of attrition will favor it in long drawn out wars. Has large stockpile of rockets, ballistic missiles and drones. Have a significant influence in the middle east by it's proxies), Egypt, Saudi Arabia(one of the largest importers of US arms)
    E: Vietnam(King of Jungle warfare), Indonesia(Formidable jungle warfare), Philippines(Currently upgrading and modernizing it's military. Experience in counter insurgency), Malaysia

    • @googoodod2276
      @googoodod2276 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Soviets lost more than 800.000 and Ukraine should be on B list while Russia and India with China have the most poorly trained troops.

    • @dirge44
      @dirge44 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Holy shit. The isralie aire force kill ratio is 19:1? Even america wont want to mess with that

    • @IsraelMilitaryChannel
      @IsraelMilitaryChannel 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dirge44 During the late 1970s, the Israeli aircraft inventory was basically the same as the US (F-4s, A-4s) during the Vietnam War. Both the Vietnam War and the Six Days/Yom Kippur War happened in the 1967 to 1973 time-frame. The same analogy can be seen between the Arab armies and the North Vietnamese in terms of equipment, with MiG-17s, MiG-19s and MiG-21s.
      The North Vietnamese had about 16 aces throughout the War while the US only had 3 aces. At the same time Egypt had 5 aces and Syria had 7 aces. Israel had 49 aces. Don't forget the Israel-Arab and the American-Vietnamese battles happened while having the same aircraft and equipment.

  • @harjindersinghdeepa1861
    @harjindersinghdeepa1861 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    India and Russia Brahmos 🚀🚀🚀 only one Air force ✈️, Navy 🛥️🛳️ and army only brahmos

  • @JoseLopez-xu8ue
    @JoseLopez-xu8ue 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    AI art function intelligent missiles unit unity teaching is needed

  • @YIIIIEOVA
    @YIIIIEOVA 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    GRAB YOUR THAWBS GUYS ITS WAR.

  • @dannybartlett4225
    @dannybartlett4225 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    EFPs are useless especial APS systems lol and you did not talk about the new Night Vision from UK making it the best night vision of all time we will own the night UK MOD are leading the way in all these fields and more Tempest is just the tip of the list

  • @petersulewski
    @petersulewski 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    you know what's not top military tech? GCSS-A... seriously f that system

  • @886535
    @886535 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The video is focused only on the promotion of US weapons technologies.
    However, it is a famous fact that the US humanoid robots got lost in their experiments in the forest area, again, the F35s marketed by the US to the world in fighter aircraft have more than 800 defects and still cannot get permission to fight.
    5. US technology, which has not achieved success in the generation of fighter aircraft, 6. it holds no promise for the generation. But in your videos, you show yourself as the most advanced technology owner in the world.
    Apart from the USA, you have not felt the need for research and examination on combat technologies in the UK, France, Russia, China, Turkey.
    It is obvious that the United States is not as advanced as you imply in the field of artificial intelligence and electronic warfare.

    • @Chris-go9zj
      @Chris-go9zj 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You don’t know what the US has because they would never make it public lol

    • @sggsdsgdgsd6897
      @sggsdsgdgsd6897 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Idk you might be a little ignorant

    • @886535
      @886535 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mine is an opinion that includes expert opinions published in the US media. But you are accusing me of ignorance. Which of us are ignorant and stupid, you who cannot provide concrete evidence for his claim, or I who question him with evidence?@@sggsdsgdgsd6897

  • @nikkomonedera5
    @nikkomonedera5 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    deployed china... destroy all colones

  • @phillippe.cai.
    @phillippe.cai. 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Хорошие будущее, это то будущее в котором не будет рашистов!

    • @TheMusan970
      @TheMusan970 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      а что насчет националистов?

  • @americanmade6996
    @americanmade6996 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well that was a wasted eight minutes. Nothing new, no details---I might as well have watched a Northrop Grumman commercial.

  • @Tommy-zs6ro
    @Tommy-zs6ro 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    I've seen this nonsense since the 80s, it's just CGI now

    • @urmom5219
      @urmom5219 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      There always ten years ahead of what there public with thus is old tech very old

    • @allenbryant7749
      @allenbryant7749 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      I don't remember them having the internet in the 80's. The sure as hell
      Didn't have UAP's. Its all CGI's now
      What!? Not even going to dignify that with a response.

    • @j99044
      @j99044 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      low iq response

    • @proffesordickfacejr.4886
      @proffesordickfacejr.4886 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yup me too... I'm just trying to find cool lookin small arms

    • @PH03N1X-gm5jt
      @PH03N1X-gm5jt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@allenbryant7749 He don't even know what he's talking about he's just trying to say sum to discredit it