Thank you. Very informative and helpful. I now feel equipped to start analyzing my games and embark on another path of chess improvement. This video deserves more views and more comments from those that viewed it. Engagements is incredibly important to content creators, and I’m sure the vast majority of viewers learned at the very least a little-and many of us a great deal. If you watched this and are reading the comments, at least drop a line saying thank you. Let’s take care of the people who take care of us.
This had given me a A LOT OF IDEAS when it comes to annotating my games. The questions by Kostya of evaluations a move, which would serve as stuff to look at with the computer, really helpful tips.
Really appreciate this!🙏 Being an old person & a beginner on a tight budget watching how to analyze independently is very useful (no chess coaches or chess club memberships in my future😂).
Is it normal to analyze every game this deep? It seems like he is going through almost every move looking for multiple lines. I am only at 29:44 atm. When I have analyzed my games (which I admit I don’t do enough) I briefly go over it with an engine for maybe 3-5 minutes if that and then move on to something else whether that be another game, tactics, studying something, etc. Mind you I’m also very new to this.
In the beginning, the analysis won't be as intensive! Just getting started with analysis and taking time to annotate/actually write your notes down is the first step. Gradually, as you get better and get more experience, it'll get deeper and more involved.
Question because you know so many chess players - objective question. I couldn't find them all but i have looked up on chessable some of the all time leaders on tactics problems. And then looked up their actual ratings. I haven't seen any huge rating jumps? Really on any course i was able to find the all time leaders (guys with legend status and millions of points)?
@@ChessDojo Well practice is supposed to make you better. Kostya did the woodpecker method. People are paying for the service to get better. Why isn't it working, those guys solved ten million tactics etc?
@@shaungraham-bowcaster7331 You need to focus your line of reasoning when asking questions. Otherwise you make your question too complex, prolific, confusing and hard to answer. Also: you are using the question mark '❓️' in a wrong way. I would advise you to listen (or read) to how people recognized for having good grammar ask questions and notice that when they want to make a complex question they say something like: "considering X, how do you see X + Y happening? " (notice that X and Y must have a crystal clear correlation between them.)
As an adult improver without a coach this is solid gold with a cherry on top.
The irony is not lost on me. We need a 1 hour lesson with a coach in order to not need a coach!
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.
@@marinokuper7966 Give a man a fire and you keep him warm for a day. But set a man on fire and you keep him warm for the rest of his life.
😂
Thank you.
Very informative and helpful. I now feel equipped to start analyzing my games and embark on another path of chess improvement.
This video deserves more views and more comments from those that viewed it. Engagements is incredibly important to content creators, and I’m sure the vast majority of viewers learned at the very least a little-and many of us a great deal. If you watched this and are reading the comments, at least drop a line saying thank you.
Let’s take care of the people who take care of us.
This had given me a A LOT OF IDEAS when it comes to annotating my games. The questions by Kostya of evaluations a move, which would serve as stuff to look at with the computer, really helpful tips.
Awesome!
Really appreciate this!🙏
Being an old person & a beginner on a tight budget watching how to analyze independently is very useful (no chess coaches or chess club memberships in my future😂).
Thank you. Learned a lot.
Thanks Kostya!
Totally great!
25:22 RIP headphone users
The great irony of this channel to date is that this video is coming from Kostya, and not Jesse.
Is it normal to analyze every game this deep? It seems like he is going through almost every move looking for multiple lines. I am only at 29:44 atm. When I have analyzed my games (which I admit I don’t do enough) I briefly go over it with an engine for maybe 3-5 minutes if that and then move on to something else whether that be another game, tactics, studying something, etc. Mind you I’m also very new to this.
In the beginning, the analysis won't be as intensive! Just getting started with analysis and taking time to annotate/actually write your notes down is the first step. Gradually, as you get better and get more experience, it'll get deeper and more involved.
@@ChessDojo I will definitely try to do it more then. Right now I am only really doing tactics so I’m sure it will help me a lot.
Question because you know so many chess players - objective question. I couldn't find them all but i have looked up on chessable some of the all time leaders on tactics problems. And then looked up their actual ratings. I haven't seen any huge rating jumps? Really on any course i was able to find the all time leaders (guys with legend status and millions of points)?
What's the question? 🙂
@@ChessDojo Well practice is supposed to make you better. Kostya did the woodpecker method. People are paying for the service to get better. Why isn't it working, those guys solved ten million tactics etc?
@@shaungraham-bowcaster7331 it would be interesting to see these guys you're talking about
@@shaungraham-bowcaster7331 You need to focus your line of reasoning when asking questions. Otherwise you make your question too complex, prolific, confusing and hard to answer. Also: you are using the question mark '❓️' in a wrong way. I would advise you to listen (or read) to how people recognized for having good grammar ask questions and notice that when they want to make a complex question they say something like: "considering X, how do you see X + Y happening? " (notice that X and Y must have a crystal clear correlation between them.)
@@josesantos2084 I would advise you to not be an idiot. But what's the point in advising an idiot?
First :)
annotate or analyze? two very different words.
Annotate
@@ChessDojo You definately meant analyze because annotating would be recording the moves in the game.
No that would be "to notate". Annotating a game means recording your thoughts and analysis afterwards 🙂
You are analyzing the game just like every other video.🙃
Just the fact you say recording thoughts and analysis meaning notating as in "taking notes"