The Incomprehensible Scale of 52!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ก.ย. 2020
  • One of my favorite fun facts to share with someone is how no matter how implausible it seems, every time you shuffle a deck of cards, you've produced a sequence of cards that has never existed before.
    It's of course natural to doubt or even disagree with this. After all, 52! just cannot be fit into any type of visualization with an object we are familiar with. So we cant mentally picture just how immense it is. For this reason I like to say there are an infinite ways to shuffle a deck of cards. Since no human nor humanity itself could ever possibly produce every single combination.
    Seriously. If humanity managed to become some kind of card shuffling empire and managed to shuffle a trillion unique decks a second since the start of the universe you legitimately wouldn't accomplish anything.
    I cannot explain with words how large 52! is.
    As unique as each individual order of cards is, more so is the person you are. Not even considering the genetic possibilities for a person but the life decisions and experiences you've encountered throughout. You may not feel it. But it's pretty crazy that you exist.
    The sand calculations I just took as an amalgam of the tons of different rough estimates I can find on the web. It ranges from 10^18 up to 10^25.

ความคิดเห็น • 10K

  • @TarDeisa
    @TarDeisa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32221

    "There are virtually infinite possible ways to shuffle a deck of cards, yet solitaire still becomes a bit samey after a few games"

    • @bigsteve6729
      @bigsteve6729 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1107

      That's because the computer doesn't really make random numbers.

    • @TarDeisa
      @TarDeisa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5939

      @@bigsteve6729 solitaire is a card game, you dont have to play it on your pc 👀

    • @xNathan2439x
      @xNathan2439x 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2475

      @@TarDeisa this made me laugh way to fucking much.

    • @kenjen9861
      @kenjen9861 2 ปีที่แล้ว +973

      What kind of mofo plays solitaire without a computer

    • @Ok-ik4ww
      @Ok-ik4ww 2 ปีที่แล้ว +437

      @@TarDeisa ok but who do you know that plays solitaire without a computer

  • @seand0112
    @seand0112 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6296

    "52 is massive!"
    53: You don't know the true power of the dark side

    • @user.who137
      @user.who137 2 ปีที่แล้ว +614

      54 enters chat

    • @seand0112
      @seand0112 2 ปีที่แล้ว +229

      @@user.who137 *Rayo's number enters chat* (the largest known number)

    • @user.who137
      @user.who137 2 ปีที่แล้ว +828

      @@seand0112 rayos number +1 enters behind him

    • @izjgxj4275
      @izjgxj4275 2 ปีที่แล้ว +290

      @@seand0112 technically there is no such thing as largest known number as you will always know a bigger one by just adding 1. I didn't previously know of this but from a quick Google search it's the biggest named number (clearly defined). This description may not be accurate/fully correct but certainly better than yours :)

    • @seand0112
      @seand0112 2 ปีที่แล้ว +131

      @@user.who137 while it is not a number, I'm still adding it so you can't beat me! *Infinity on the roof with a sniper*

  • @CapAnson12345
    @CapAnson12345 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1753

    I like to imagine that somewhere, at some time perhaps a weekend poker session a group of friends in Omaha, NE on August 24, 1957 some guy broke out a deck of cards.. riffled it a few times then promptly shuffled the deck into the exact same order someone in 1886 in Marseilles France did -despite the infinitesimal but non-zero odds. He then promptly started dealing the cards never knowing the monumental feat he just accomplished.

    • @ameyskulkarni
      @ameyskulkarni 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +104

      Oddly specific lol

    • @draheim90
      @draheim90 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +234

      Yeah this video assumes the deck is in a truly random order. But in real life decks come in a preset order and most people don’t shuffle enough to sufficiently randomize the deck. So the odds of a not-perfectly-shuffled deck of cards being in the same order as another are much better, and perhaps it’s happened quite a few times, maybe even with some regularity.

    • @Vitorruy1
      @Vitorruy1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@draheim90 cool but what are the odds given a true random shuffle?

    • @draheim90
      @draheim90 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +151

      @@Vitorruy1 the video goes into that in quite a bit of detail.

    • @dalenewton9697
      @dalenewton9697 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      If this has ever actually happened, Phil Ivey probably saw it coming.

  • @HenryScreee
    @HenryScreee 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

    i didn't know what a factorial was so i thought he was just really excited to talk about how big 52 is

  • @nicks2437
    @nicks2437 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11492

    I remember learning factorial in high school. The teacher had a deck of cards and was just shuffling it. She stopped, offered the deck to the class, and asked: "Does anyone else want to make history?"

    • @Schoofsrl
      @Schoofsrl 2 ปีที่แล้ว +426

      Lmao

    • @SagittariusAyy
      @SagittariusAyy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1464

      Based teacher

    • @faqconill6478
      @faqconill6478 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1113

      gotta say, that's pretty fucking cool

    • @NKrypt
      @NKrypt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +539

      I remember when we started talking about exponentials in Alg 2, my teacher asked how many times you would need to fold a piece of paper which was 0.0032" thick for the paper to reach some height. It turned out somewhere in the 50s the height of the folded paper is tall enough to reach the sun.

    • @kibukaj2956
      @kibukaj2956 2 ปีที่แล้ว +95

      wait, factorial in high school? we were learning them in primary

  • @izzynobre
    @izzynobre 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8729

    Start with some interesting fact about playing cards, ends being profoundly touching.

    • @TheRABIDdude
      @TheRABIDdude 2 ปีที่แล้ว +164

      Just like a creepy uncle.

    • @tyronevaldez-kruger5313
      @tyronevaldez-kruger5313 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      True. My state of mind while watching 😐🧐🤔😳😲😧🥺😌😊

    • @pladselsker8340
      @pladselsker8340 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      until you realize that the universe being practically incomprehensibly permutable has nothing to do with taking care of the people you like

    • @luissampaio2104
      @luissampaio2104 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hey Izzy, how's you doing!?

    • @yaslerfuj
      @yaslerfuj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Very Vsauce-esc in such a good way

  • @fuzz4173
    @fuzz4173 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +256

    A great quote I once read about this, it totally blew my mind:
    Say that there exists 10 Billion people on every planet, 1 Billion planets in every solar system, 200 Billion solar systems in every galaxy, and 500 Billion galaxies in the universe. If every single person on every planet has been shuffling decks of cards completely at random at 1 Million shuffles per second since the BEGINNING OF TIME, every possible deck combination would still yet to have been “shuffled”.

    • @ambermoon1341
      @ambermoon1341 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      Assuming that was true it would take 35176(.4631648) times the age of the UNIVERSE to shuffle every card combination assuming each shuffle was a unique deck

    • @JS-mg1mk
      @JS-mg1mk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Well I won't be sleeping tonight due to thinking about this. Thanks 👍🏻

    • @BEN-ys6gu
      @BEN-ys6gu 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@ambermoon1341 a shuffle should be something random, so I wonder how much it would take on average to do all possible decks if each shuffle was random

    • @ambermoon1341
      @ambermoon1341 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BEN-ys6gu well idk but probably atleast a couple times longer

    • @pietervansever
      @pietervansever 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@BEN-ys6gu you would never achieve 100% certainty, so infinity. But can approach 100% but then you will ve talking about googology size numbers

  • @Darex718
    @Darex718 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +141

    Fun Fact: You'd have to win the Powerball lottery jackpot approximately 286 times in a row to surpass the rarity of the number of unique combinations in a standard deck of cards.

    • @quazzydiscman
      @quazzydiscman 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      I'm on 272.... I'll let you know how it goes

    • @Darex718
      @Darex718 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@quazzydiscman bro share some luck with me as well

    • @log.c
      @log.c 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      I got to be honest only 286 of them really proves how rare it is to win the lottery.

    • @snp9417
      @snp9417 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@log.c Yes, but also not really. To win the lottery is rare. To win the lottery twice is extremely rare. To win the lottery 3 times is practically impossible. Now do that 286 times. That's pretty much literally impossible thus aiding to how 52! is basically infinite for all we care

    • @snp9417
      @snp9417 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@log.c Winning the lottery multiple times is an astronomically rare event, and the number of possible unique outcomes increases exponentially with each additional draw or trial.

  • @crasanj2157
    @crasanj2157 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2472

    That ending reminds me of my favorite back-handed compliment: "You are unique. _Just_ like everyone else!"

    • @siliconhawk9293
      @siliconhawk9293 2 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      So if everything thing is unique nothing is unique. Lol.
      Jokes aside i wonder when something stops being unique. The only thing that is not unique imo are concepts or something like that. Zero is the same everywhere and maths is the same everywhere as well i think.

    • @lancasterbristow9410
      @lancasterbristow9410 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      For once snowflakes people makes sense in this video.

    • @suicideistheanswer369
      @suicideistheanswer369 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Momento Mori

    • @carrit8501
      @carrit8501 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@siliconhawk9293 & with everyone super… no one is mwahahahahahahahahdybaybtdguybiuhnosidncbwiud$o 2’:$

    • @mikeywilson9243
      @mikeywilson9243 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Just noticed your profile pic. Memento Mori, [REDACTED], [REDACTED

  • @diulikadikaday
    @diulikadikaday ปีที่แล้ว +6141

    Another great representation of giant numbers:
    One million seconds: 12 days
    One billion seconds: 32 years

    • @nitrofan917
      @nitrofan917 ปีที่แล้ว +658

      A trillion seconds: 31 thousand years.

    • @mattedjon-veryaccuratetabs
      @mattedjon-veryaccuratetabs ปีที่แล้ว +41

      Very cool thanks!

    • @realdarcia2354
      @realdarcia2354 ปีที่แล้ว +354

      1 million second sice you commented. see you in 31 years.

    • @beziimusic
      @beziimusic ปีที่แล้ว +45

      Well yeah, one billion is 1000 times larger than one million; 31 years is 1000 times longer than 12 days

    • @diulikadikaday
      @diulikadikaday ปีที่แล้ว +123

      @@beziimusic, yes, that's the point we are trying to make. 1000 x 1 million = 1 billion.
      but how do you help people understand that order of magnitude when they haven't really encountered that.

  • @rickhale4348
    @rickhale4348 ปีที่แล้ว +361

    This makes you feel small and insignificant and at the same time special and unique.

    • @Novarcharesk
      @Novarcharesk 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      No, it really doesn’t make me feel insignificant at all 😂

    • @AlphaCarinae
      @AlphaCarinae 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Being unique is nothing special, because everyone is unique.

    • @rickhale4348
      @rickhale4348 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AlphaCarinae True.

    • @7MinutozRapsLetras
      @7MinutozRapsLetras 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AlphaCarinae damn i never thought of that

    • @monkeBeastTitan
      @monkeBeastTitan 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@AlphaCarinaeyes being unique is special, because everyone is special and different due to being unique

  • @organizer53
    @organizer53 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3465

    You’re forgetting about the two joker cards that come with the deck. That will definitely crank it up to the next level

    • @PedroHenrique-yv9ku
      @PedroHenrique-yv9ku 2 ปีที่แล้ว +266

      Just pick the number said on the video and multiply it by 2862

    • @Cesar.Flowers
      @Cesar.Flowers 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Love ur fire alchemy pfp

    • @accuratejaney8140
      @accuratejaney8140 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      I have 4 jokers but the 2nd black is missing

    • @Talking_Ed
      @Talking_Ed 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Add the rule card!

    • @RealKlausSchwab
      @RealKlausSchwab 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Fun Fact, The entire world economy is worth 80 trillion.... and Biden has spent almost 9 trillion of it in 10 months.

  • @turbo_marc
    @turbo_marc ปีที่แล้ว +2171

    Sure, you may call it “52 fAcToRiAL” but I just say “Fifty two!” with a lot of energy.

    • @humbledb4jesus
      @humbledb4jesus ปีที่แล้ว +26

      that works better than any other way...

    • @victorstiles8946
      @victorstiles8946 ปีที่แล้ว +75

      There’s a book a read as a child called the number devil about a kid who has dreams about math and all the concepts had weird names. Factorial was “vroom”. So like “52 vroom”. It’s a good book

    • @TrondArneAusdal
      @TrondArneAusdal ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's funny 🙂

    • @timclinton9427
      @timclinton9427 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      It's all about the energy brother
      50twwwwwwwoooooooo

    • @jonmobrien
      @jonmobrien ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That's how I read the thumbnail

  • @seyedmatintavakoliafshari8272
    @seyedmatintavakoliafshari8272 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I did NOT see that coming! I've been thinking about scale and orders of magnitude for quite a while, and you just shed light to a whole new perspective. Thank you for making this video unexpectingly motivational!!

  • @brittleann9823
    @brittleann9823 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Respectfully, wtf. You broke my brain & made me feel incredibly special at the same time. 🥴💛💛

  • @MedlifeCrisis
    @MedlifeCrisis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5308

    Wasn’t really sure what to expect from the title but damn this was really good! Graphics were great and explained really well.

    • @frankerzed973
      @frankerzed973 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Same goes for your videos! Though a tad bit of more visuals would perhaps go a long way 🥰

    • @miroslavmilan
      @miroslavmilan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Indeed. Based on the title I was really curious what’s so special about number 52. Not 52! :)

    • @neillynch_ecocidologist
      @neillynch_ecocidologist 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      When we consider all those life experiences he mentions at the end that are different for each and every one of us, is it any wonder people convince themselves they have free will. When really they just have an infinitely complex life that the brain evolved to attempt to make sense of, leading us all to do that what we do at any and every given moment in time.

    • @dhonnano7417
      @dhonnano7417 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nice

    • @n3v3rg01ngback
      @n3v3rg01ngback 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m everywhere too.

  • @PsychedelicStorm
    @PsychedelicStorm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1434

    “The life we’re living is a once in a universe experience.” I love that quote!

    • @throbbingloadpump902
      @throbbingloadpump902 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yeah it was my favorite line of the video

    • @TheOiseau
      @TheOiseau 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Everyone is unique, just like everybody else.

    • @PsychedelicStorm
      @PsychedelicStorm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@TheOiseau you got that right. For every physical/mental flaw we can focus on, in general we never see the beauty of how they make us unique. Some flaws suck more than others, but they all make us stronger when used correctly. The people we are today won’t be the same people tomorrow. It’s up to us to find the positivity in our lives and thrive on the lessons we learn about ourselves and others. Science rulez!!!

    • @aliveandwellinisrael2507
      @aliveandwellinisrael2507 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      A universe that might be infinite, in which case, no. You're not unique.

    • @jameskrogman6786
      @jameskrogman6786 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@aliveandwellinisrael2507 came looking for this comment. In an infinite universe, none of us are unique.

  • @andretremblay5344
    @andretremblay5344 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Seems to me like this is the kind of thing we need more of on the Internet. Terrific video! Thank you.

  • @tarentino3269
    @tarentino3269 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    the ending of the video honestly is more motivating than anything i have ever heard in motivational speeches, thank you for this

  • @zandern7315
    @zandern7315 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1280

    I love how every time 52! Is written it can also just be interpreted as someone who is very enthusiastic about numbers

    • @sadcheesehoe9646
      @sadcheesehoe9646 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      I really like your comment, it's cute.

    • @zandern7315
      @zandern7315 2 ปีที่แล้ว +60

      @@sadcheesehoe9646 thank you sad cheesehoe

    • @NoPrefect
      @NoPrefect 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I used to say that to my old math students.

    • @tapsil.mcgeee
      @tapsil.mcgeee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      @@NoPrefect why did you call your old math students a sad cheesehoe ?

    • @NoPrefect
      @NoPrefect 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@tapsil.mcgeee lol no, I just always said factorials as though they were and actual exclamation. Apparently they carried it on and annoyed their teachers with it for the next three years until they all graduated. Proud of them.

  • @miszamojcyszschmidt1746
    @miszamojcyszschmidt1746 2 ปีที่แล้ว +164

    Reading title: What's wrong with 52?
    After one "52 factorial": Oh, it's 52!

  • @CleanUsername
    @CleanUsername 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Went from clicking on an intresting looking video to being truly moved at the end. Great video!

  • @nolanburton7985
    @nolanburton7985 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great, great, great presentation. Thank you! Mind blowing indeed. Life is incredible. 52!

  • @GIBKEL
    @GIBKEL 2 ปีที่แล้ว +726

    It reminds me of being a kid, staring off into space with a friend and talking yourself into the possibility of the infinite. Strange as it may sound, my child like wonder made it magical and my 52 year old self begins to fear the terror implied.

    • @thegallivantinggamers4904
      @thegallivantinggamers4904 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      Haha 52 just like the number of cards in the deck

    • @f_USAF-Lt.G
      @f_USAF-Lt.G 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Like the Lagos in philosophy... The contemplation within conversations revealing what we know leads to the questions of further studies.

    • @FiksIIanzO
      @FiksIIanzO 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      It feels like the more we understand the world, the scarier it becomes. Not due to us learning about the dangers, which are many, but simply because at this scale and with so much happening _everywhere,_ nobody would ever care about something as insignificant as a human some 70 years after they're gone - not even a blink of an eye in the scale of the universe.
      But this can lead to another conclusion. The more insignificant we know we are in the grand scheme of things, the more significant we become on a personal level, to each other. When no big things can ever be approached by you, you have a blank cheque of time to do the little things for those who would appreciate it. And even if we're not remembered down the line, what matters is we are here, and while we know nothing about people before us, we know they were there.
      Humanity's legacy is your legacy, and look how far we've come.

    • @bozo7893
      @bozo7893 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@f_USAF-Lt.G answers will only lead to more questions

    • @GIBKEL
      @GIBKEL 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@FiksIIanzO Beautiful, it’s good to once again, have a friend look off into space and say, it’s going to be okay.

  • @thisissostupidqsdfva
    @thisissostupidqsdfva 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3667

    Google estimates the amount of atoms in the milky way to be 2.4×10^67. This is roughly 1/3 of the amount of ways a 52 deck of cards can be arranged. Decent way to attempt to visualize 52!

    • @aorusx7859
      @aorusx7859 2 ปีที่แล้ว +352

      @Arturo’s Michelangeli 53!

    • @zanussidish8144
      @zanussidish8144 2 ปีที่แล้ว +82

      @Arturo’s Michelangeli Just over 1x10^69

    • @zanussidish8144
      @zanussidish8144 2 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      @Arturo’s Michelangeli 4 with 69 zeros after.

    • @justinrussell2865
      @justinrussell2865 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@zanussidish8144 nice

    • @escutler
      @escutler 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@zanussidish8144 nice

  • @NoNameX_X0
    @NoNameX_X0 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    the way you smoothly changed the subject to us being unique was was very nicely done.

    • @AlphaCarinae
      @AlphaCarinae 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, you're unique. Just like everyone else.

  • @ScienceDrummer
    @ScienceDrummer 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    As a kid I was always sad when someone or something died, as I knew I'd never really get to see that same version of that ever again. It wasn't the fact that I lost it, it's that I'd never get to experience with that very specific thing ever again. This video sums up my feelings of this.

    • @dc6642
      @dc6642 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Oh but you will do again, infinitely and always have done, infinitely.

    • @mt_gox
      @mt_gox 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@dc6642yup ...there was no big bang...the cosmos is eternal

  • @kellypocalypse
    @kellypocalypse 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Watching this video just made me feel better. Thank you

  • @wren5413
    @wren5413 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1626

    Id like to imagine that the first 2 times a deck of cards were ever shuffled, they resulted in the same exact order just out of sheer coincidence

    • @bear-lyinsane3099
      @bear-lyinsane3099 2 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      Only if the first person to shuffle cards was a true mechanic

    • @ceilinglight1413
      @ceilinglight1413 2 ปีที่แล้ว +81

      Slight of hand 100

    • @TreeImmortal
      @TreeImmortal 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      Love it. Straight out of a Pratchett book.

    • @thesoftone
      @thesoftone 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@TreeImmortal actually based, chad literature

    • @wintergreen2993
      @wintergreen2993 2 ปีที่แล้ว +59

      it's true I was actually there when it happened but nobody has ever believed me

  • @AmmarAbdSaleh
    @AmmarAbdSaleh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2382

    The thing is, it’s close to infinity in our human comprehension. But it has little to no value compared to infinity.

    • @cheesebossfinch8071
      @cheesebossfinch8071 2 ปีที่แล้ว +312

      I mean... Kind of. But to be fair, infinity is a concept, not a number. Literally every number has no value compared to infinity because you quite literally cannot calculate it. I could take one hundred million factorial, and it would still mean nothing next to infinity (and conversely infinity would mean nothing next to it) since I'm comparing apples and oranges.

    • @shirori2004
      @shirori2004 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@cheesebossfinch8071 Infinity is a concept, absolute infinity is a...

    • @jonwalters485
      @jonwalters485 2 ปีที่แล้ว +140

      @@shirori2004 absolute concept. Rekt

    • @RealKlausSchwab
      @RealKlausSchwab 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      The entire world economy is worth 80 trillion.... and Biden has spent almost 9 trillion of it in 10 months.

    • @cheesebossfinch8071
      @cheesebossfinch8071 2 ปีที่แล้ว +88

      @@RealKlausSchwab oh great, found that guy

  • @ThingsYouMightLike
    @ThingsYouMightLike 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This video was incredibly informational, peaceful, and uplifting. This is one of the easiest subscribes I've ever done.

  • @prod._zUKu
    @prod._zUKu ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for the message at the end! Needed it

  • @user295295
    @user295295 2 ปีที่แล้ว +463

    "Round off to infinity" is the type of talk my math teacher would rap my knuckles for.

    • @Trucmuch
      @Trucmuch 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Well, your maths teacher is right. And that's why the very important caveat "as far as humans are concerned" was added.
      52! and infinity are two very different things, but in any physical interpretations, they are basically the same thing (ie way more than anything we could count).

    • @abalakrishnan4152
      @abalakrishnan4152 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      True unless you are in calculus and beyond.

    • @CrustyCrendan
      @CrustyCrendan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The difference is between actual mathematical implications and practical real world applications. The point is that the amount of unique combos in a deck of cards is so ludicrously vast that none of us can even comprehend it, again more than total number of protons and neutrons on all of planet earth

    • @freeman10000
      @freeman10000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      On a human scale 52! Is essentially infinity. Many calculators can't do any calculations above 69!
      Big numbers are so cool !

    • @fakeemail4005
      @fakeemail4005 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@freeman10000 Its nuts to think that calculators can do calculations of numbers larger than the amount of atoms they're made of

  • @JonWilsonPhysics
    @JonWilsonPhysics 2 ปีที่แล้ว +509

    My second grade teacher wanted to know how much a million really looked like, so she decided to collect a million of something. The pull tabs off drink cans are plentiful, pretty small, and lightweight, so she started collecting those. All of her students and their families saved every tab and brought them in. Pretty soon, every class in the school was contributing, too. Obviously we weren't going to actually count all of them, so we started weighing them. It took a few years, but eventually she had a million drink-can tabs, and we all developed a better sense of just how big a million of something really is.

    • @rushthezeppelin
      @rushthezeppelin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      All that and you didn't tell us how big it was....

    • @JonWilsonPhysics
      @JonWilsonPhysics 2 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      @@rushthezeppelin This was 20 years ago, and she finished a few years after I was in her class, so I don't remember all that well. I think it took up around 3-5 large moving boxes (roughly 1 meter on a side). But maybe I remember the boxes as being larger than they were because I was smaller back then.

    • @samuelromero5786
      @samuelromero5786 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I could easily collect 1000000 beans lmao

    • @calebpenny4880
      @calebpenny4880 2 ปีที่แล้ว +60

      @Angry Combat Wombat you absolutely destroyed him geez😭

    • @Tommy-hp8je
      @Tommy-hp8je 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      You could be the first to understand 52! Just collent 52! drink can tabs. Can't be too hard, right?

  • @hurricanemeridian8712
    @hurricanemeridian8712 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I really love the moral of this, thank you for making this type of content

  • @migram4190
    @migram4190 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really needed that end note. Thank you 😊

  • @David-ej9jp
    @David-ej9jp ปีที่แล้ว +1647

    "Scientists have calculated that the chances of something so patently absurd actually existing are millions to one.
    But magicians have calculated that million-to-one chances crop up nine times out of ten."
    Terry Pratchett

    • @TheGalaxyWings
      @TheGalaxyWings ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Good reference

    • @Yora21
      @Yora21 ปีที่แล้ว +111

      A one in a million thing happening to you is very unlikely.
      A one in a million thing happening to someone is going to happen thousands of times.

    • @russell62790
      @russell62790 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Magicians don't calculate, they create illusion. Tricksters.

    • @JaredMcwilliams115
      @JaredMcwilliams115 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @Craig I love how you put that comment, I can hear the eye squint on "tricksters" 😂😂😂

    • @JamesBrown-fd1nv
      @JamesBrown-fd1nv ปีที่แล้ว

      Scientists are humans that could sell you a bag of shit and convince you that it is pudding. Science today is about concensus not facts, and that is the only reason that evolution, global warming, and uneducated people are sustainable.

  • @Frizzable
    @Frizzable 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2411

    Fine TH-cam, I clicked it. Ya happy?

    • @thorny8013
      @thorny8013 2 ปีที่แล้ว +70

      He's actually good and his content is Good. Unlike.....well many others

    • @Frizzable
      @Frizzable 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      @@thorny8013 never said it was bad lol I watched the whole video

    • @thorny8013
      @thorny8013 2 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      @@Frizzable yeah. Just you shouldn't show as if these small channels are just sprawling over YT Recommendations. And you just click them because you have been fed up from them.
      It just seems disrespectful.
      His content is fabulous. It deserves attention.

    • @smobasi3367
      @smobasi3367 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Huh

    • @Hyacinth77
      @Hyacinth77 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Meeeeeeee, this keeps getting recommended

  • @okdn6336
    @okdn6336 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    2:50 That little laugh after you say “Let’s try to” kills me every time! You already know 🤣

  • @_simon.s_
    @_simon.s_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +902

    "Hey Patrick."
    "What?"
    "I thought of something better than 52!"
    "Let me hear it."
    "53!"

    • @kiyrukk
      @kiyrukk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      And I thought on 54! 😎

    • @perfectlimitless5944
      @perfectlimitless5944 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      52!^52!

    • @coyote6154
      @coyote6154 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      52!!

    • @Zac8668
      @Zac8668 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      what about (52!)!?

    • @eckee
      @eckee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +59

      Not even close to you moms weight

  • @Alekkek
    @Alekkek 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2011

    This man just mathematically demonstrated to us that we are truly unique. This is info I won't forget

    • @Dr.Spatula
      @Dr.Spatula 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      Not to be a spoil sport or anything, but that uniqueness is about the same as 2 cars of the same make, model, and trim rolling off the assembly line

    • @logan6232
      @logan6232 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@Dr.Spatula that would be true if cars all looked different, sounded different, liked different things, and did different things

    • @Dr.Spatula
      @Dr.Spatula 2 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      @@logan6232 except, here's the thing. You clearly don't understand so I'll explain it to you. People do generally all look the same except for a couple major differences like color, hair, and height. All just different options, like paint, trim, wheels, that make us slightly different but still essentially the same.
      All people more or less sound the same, too. "But Language." Speech is a collections of sounds that everyone can make. Someone's got a deep voice? There's an option for that.
      If the internet has taught us anything it's that if you like something you can find someone else who did too. But realistically, how different does that make us? You see two Camerys diving down the street can you tell which one has been smoked in? Who uses the better oil? What the octane of gas they have? How much air is in the tires?
      And we all do the she shit. We eat, sleep, shit, and die. Anything beyond that is philosophical. But hey, the same car can "do" a bunch of different things like commute, long haul, or race
      So tell me, how different are you really from every other person on earth?

    • @TheHandyMan101
      @TheHandyMan101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      @@Dr.Spatula yeah we’re all human beings obviously lol but like you’re the only person seeing your life

    • @alexp5569
      @alexp5569 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@Dr.Spatula We may be only slightly different but in the end, no one is identical to someone else. Isn't that enough for you? If not, then it's just matter of perspective.

  • @anowlwithinternet9125
    @anowlwithinternet9125 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    One of the best videos I've ever watched on this red platform

  • @angelinasurzhyk6655
    @angelinasurzhyk6655 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Among everything else, the visuals in this video are GORGEOUS

  • @TheSchematican
    @TheSchematican 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2473

    This level of scale reminds me of a fever dream
    I had when I was younger. I was trying to accomplish something and I suddenly realized that my odds of success were in this magnitude and it was terrifying beyond belief for some reason..

    • @plumbusman
      @plumbusman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Your odds of success, and failure, were beyond this magnitude, equally!
      Did you succeed, btw?

    • @BierBart12
      @BierBart12 2 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      I get that feeling whenever I lay in bed and put a warming bottle over my eyes, for some reason. It's terrifying in a beautiful way, sobering

    • @hadyanth
      @hadyanth 2 ปีที่แล้ว +76

      Your brain attempts to protect you from trauma. So when you encounter a topic like this, the mind stresses in trying to rationalise it and when it can't, the 'fear' you felt is a defense mechanism.
      Its like the theory that God has no beginning and no end, has always and will always be. When you truly try to rationalise it, it gets freaky.

    • @hholmberg6253
      @hholmberg6253 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hey me too!

    • @WellToastedBagel
      @WellToastedBagel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      I had a similar dream once as well. I was running towards something, but it kept gradually getting farther away. It got to a point where the running became sinking, and the object was becoming a sphere in a dark and almost depressing darkness. I could never reach it, but it also was never quite out of sight.
      I didn't wake up from this dream, nor was I ever scared of it. But now as an adult, it's a bit unnerving to think I had that dream on multiple occasions. Cause that dream certainly is how it feels some days.

  • @mraarone
    @mraarone 2 ปีที่แล้ว +425

    Beautiful concepts and dialog. The scalar field of the water molecules was a great idea and I want to show this to my kids to introduce them to fields. Great job, you’re a beautiful genius.

    • @mraarone
      @mraarone 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@masterhacker7065 I myself am afraid of the Monster. But oddly, we can associate conceivable structure with numbers this large, somehow making a bond with it. Plus I like horror flicks.

    • @f_USAF-Lt.G
      @f_USAF-Lt.G 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There is much that TH-cam has to offer for real learning... You could list educational resources for them to use & ask your kids to use device presentation platform to share with you (keeping up on skills can be family fun)

  • @jonbutcher9805
    @jonbutcher9805 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Carl Sagan in his Cosmos series told us that a Google Plex is a number so large (not infinite) that you could not put it to paper and then stuff it into the known universe. Turns out there is more than one way to visualize huge numbers. All it takes is a big brain or a big imagination for all things numerical and you will find a near infinite way of describing really big number combinations. 52i is just one of them. A really mind blowing video, thanks for posting. Love this kind of content.❤

    • @korzenpl
      @korzenpl ปีที่แล้ว

      In the topic of absurdly large numbers. Graham's number also has this property of not fitting inside our universe. One might ask: 'How many digits does the Graham's number have?'.
      Well, The number of digits of Graham's number also wouldn't fit inside our universe.

    • @jonbutcher9805
      @jonbutcher9805 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@korzenpl They are all absurdly wonderful in their absolute absurdity. One has to wonder why we find them so fascinating.

    • @Al-ji4gd
      @Al-ji4gd 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      52! is not even as big as a Googol, let alone a Googolplex.

  • @thorstenswims6088
    @thorstenswims6088 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This was actually mindblowing.

  • @RosaNagashi
    @RosaNagashi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +769

    “There will never be another you ever again”
    Good. One is more than enough lmao

    • @RealKlausSchwab
      @RealKlausSchwab 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The entire world economy is worth 80 trillion.... and Biden has spent almost 9 trillion of it in 10 months.

    • @seanlebean8160
      @seanlebean8160 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      @@RealKlausSchwab cool but unrelated

    • @HardSmartfuxu
      @HardSmartfuxu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Well he is wrong if you believe in infinity. You could've lived the exact same live for 1000x and it would absolutely possible if infinity exists.

    • @JR4996
      @JR4996 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@HardSmartfuxu Infinite time leads to infinite possibilities

    • @smileyface9459
      @smileyface9459 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@JR4996 no it only leads to infinite chances but if the chance is so minute it will probably never happen even with infinite chances

  • @coiledAgent
    @coiledAgent 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1238

    In short:
    You are incredibly unique, there will only ever be one of you. But somehow, despite everything, you will never be more unique than the order of a deck of cards. How you use this information is up to you.

    • @RiemannHypothesis2
      @RiemannHypothesis2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      on an unrelated note there is no self.

    • @tafazziReadChannelDescription
      @tafazziReadChannelDescription 2 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      I don't see why people care about uniqueness

    • @squigglybusiness7131
      @squigglybusiness7131 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Depends on how big the pack of cards are

    • @ghabsterlol7768
      @ghabsterlol7768 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      well, nyes you are too rare for the universe to lose you and you will never find another exact copy of you no matter how long you keep on searching for...

    • @Gunth0r
      @Gunth0r 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Deck of cards order: 52! or 8^67
      human genome sequence: 4^3,088,286,401
      I believe DNA wins.

  • @dunsparce4prez560
    @dunsparce4prez560 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That “but why” graphic is mildly terrifying

  • @philipparees2177
    @philipparees2177 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Brilliantly illustrated- the uniqueness of each remains, and that he makes undeniable- however much conformity denies it!

  • @deaddymanny7309
    @deaddymanny7309 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1468

    I sometimes forget how math is phenomenal when you start connecting it to the world around you... And, by the way, the words you said at the end and the whole video itself is phenomenal, gives you some thoughts to think on.

    • @XXveny
      @XXveny 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Try to connect stuff like 0 or - 55 :D
      Zero, as nothing, is not that simple as it may sound.

    • @pawnshot
      @pawnshot 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'm gonna think a thunk

    • @zxzs328
      @zxzs328 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GarrishChristopherRobin777That is so, but it's not a corpse until after the spark leaves the body.

    • @brunosantiago4849
      @brunosantiago4849 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@Check my about page link fk off

    • @anthonygelbert3818
      @anthonygelbert3818 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agreed. Here's something you may find interesting (though the video is no longer available, the quantum base of reality exhibiting the golden ratio is an established scientific fact):
      soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-270522172558-13271555.png

  • @chasingsquareworkshop
    @chasingsquareworkshop 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1574

    I don’t know who you are, or what your life has been like to bring you to the place where you create these videos and share them freely with the world, but I can say I am truly thankful for YOU. The world - my world - is a better place with you in it. Thank you.

    • @leonm2649
      @leonm2649 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      So well and humbly expressed :-)

    • @cuttheknot4781
      @cuttheknot4781 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Steve, that was sweet. Stay sweet (unless being attacked by evil space creatures...all bets are off, then).

    • @Fanny-Fanny
      @Fanny-Fanny 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      You express well how I feel. And I am humbled and pleased with the cosmic coincidence that I am person 42 to 'like' your comment.

    • @chasingsquareworkshop
      @chasingsquareworkshop 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Fanny-Fanny 42 indeed! Thank you for your kind words :)

    • @Fanny-Fanny
      @Fanny-Fanny 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chasingsquareworkshop 🙂👍

  • @danfagan71
    @danfagan71 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Fascinating! Well done.

  • @asafakanan1337
    @asafakanan1337 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    1 Million Seconds: 51 days
    1 Billion Seconds: 13 months
    Gives you a proper perspective

    • @feenik99
      @feenik99 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      such true facts

    • @Vamanos46
      @Vamanos46 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Completely wrong!
      A million seconds is 12 days.
      A billion seconds is 31 years. (A thousand fold)
      A trillion seconds is 31,688 years.

  • @benh8312
    @benh8312 2 ปีที่แล้ว +968

    The "looking for a grain of sand" analogy really hit hard, I had never appreciated just how big it was
    And then the "every nucleon on earth" one omg

    • @connman8d617
      @connman8d617 2 ปีที่แล้ว +70

      Vsaud did a video about it too. And it was mind boggling. Like take one step every million years and then when you circle the earth remove one drop of water from the pacific ocean and then once the pacific ocean is completely empty put a piece of paper on the ground and refill the ocean. And then once that stack of paper reaches the moon it will have been 52! seconds.

    • @cannyvalley8522
      @cannyvalley8522 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@connman8d617 Whoa

    • @thorfinsky1427
      @thorfinsky1427 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      @@connman8d617 It's actually take a step at the equator every billion years, when you have circled the earth take one drop of water from the Pacific Ocean, repeat,when you have emptied the Pacific Ocean place one sheet of paper on the ground, magically refill ocean and repeat until the stack of papers reach the sun, now repeat the entire scenario 3000 times and you will now have used up 52 factorial seconds. It's on YT "Math Magic" at around 11:00 in.

    • @UnderbellyNZ
      @UnderbellyNZ ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@thorfinsky1427 Thats still not close. After you have emptied the ocean, take one teaspoon of Mt Everest. Then put down the sheet of paper when Everest is flat. It is mental.

    • @ryanm6139
      @ryanm6139 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@connman8d617 that's it? Pretty sure my mom takes longer when I wait for her at the grocery store.

  • @Salted_Pizza
    @Salted_Pizza 2 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    Props to the guy who counted every grain of sand on Earth to get that number!

    • @furinick
      @furinick 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Roberto the sandcounter was a legend of his time, shame we forgot about him

    • @f_USAF-Lt.G
      @f_USAF-Lt.G 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      😂😂😂

    • @beringstraitrailway
      @beringstraitrailway 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      🏖🏝

    • @pattsw
      @pattsw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Would be mildly interesting to learn how these kinds of estimates are made....

    • @kevinmccracken8920
      @kevinmccracken8920 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pattsw average weight of a grain, average grains in an area, extrapolated for the area we find sand on Earth. That's how I'd do it. But I won't. So truly, props to the dude who crunched the numbers; I'm sure it was exceptionally tedious.

  • @RandomVex
    @RandomVex ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'd actually love a video on snow, it's so beautiful and science of it is cool af

  • @LordOut_001
    @LordOut_001 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Breaking down 52 factorial (52!) involves calculating the product of all positive integers from 1 to 52. It is an extremely large number, so let's take a look at the breakdown:
    52! = 52 × 51 × 50 × 49 × ... × 3 × 2 × 1
    To simplify the calculation, let's group some of the terms:
    52! = (52 × 51 × 50 × 49 × ... × 3) × (2 × 1)
    Now, let's calculate the two parts separately:
    Part 1: (52 × 51 × 50 × 49 × ... × 3)
    This part involves multiplying all the numbers from 52 to 3.
    Part 2: (2 × 1)
    This part is simply multiplying 2 and 1.
    Calculating Part 1:
    52 × 51 × 50 × 49 × ... × 3 = 3,041,409,320,171,337,804,361,135,652,208,989,321,781,688,343,680,000,000
    So, Part 1 of 52! is equal to 3,041,409,320,171,337,804,361,135,652,208,989,321,781,688,343,680,000,000.
    Calculating Part 2:
    2 × 1 = 2
    So, Part 2 of 52! is equal to 2.
    Finally, we multiply Part 1 and Part 2 together to get the complete value of 52!:
    52! = Part 1 × Part 2
    = 3,041,409,320,171,337,804,361,135,652,208,989,321,781,688,343,680,000,000 × 2
    And the result is:
    52! = 6,082,818,640,342,675,608,722,271,304,417,978,642,816,780,000,000
    or in word form: six quindecillion eighty-two quattuordecillion eight hundred eighteen tredecillion six hundred forty duodecillion three hundred forty-two undecillion six hundred seventy-five decillion six hundred eight nonillion seven hundred twenty-two octillion two hundred seventy-one septillion three hundred four sextillion four hundred seventeen quintillion nine hundred seventy-eight quadrillion six hundred forty-two trillion eight hundred sixteen billion seven hundred eighty million

    • @alextaxi2593
      @alextaxi2593 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Amazingly not divisible by 3

    • @quarot
      @quarot 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      or just go on big number calculator

    • @BlueBillionPoundBottleJobs
      @BlueBillionPoundBottleJobs 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Here's another question for you break down:
      Who asked?

    • @LordOut_001
      @LordOut_001 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Amazing this comment has 12 likes

  • @tensevo
    @tensevo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +413

    This explains how the world appears to be utterly incomprehensible when you look close enough.
    You would think the whole thing would be chaotic randomness, but it's not.

    • @ct4074
      @ct4074 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      Of course not! We are living in the Lord's universal matrix. The evidence of intelligent design is everywhere, including our dna software...

    • @jf2849
      @jf2849 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@ct4074 they are trying to change our dna be very skeptical of the media and any government mandate.

    • @imacmill
      @imacmill 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      @@jf2849 _they are trying to change..._
      Who are 'they'? I genuinely want to know.

    • @imacmill
      @imacmill 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      @@ct4074 _the evidence of intelligent design is everywhere_
      Absolutely true.
      _We are living in the lord's ..._
      Ridiculous conclusion. Pure fantasy.

    • @jf2849
      @jf2849 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@imacmill well you would assume Bill Gates and the United Nations with their COVID planned agenda. However it’s much bigger there are lots of people in on it large corporations and governments trying to push agendas, big pharma, the elite ruling class sickos. “They” are the ones hiding behind the curtain the ones the general public doesn’t usually see the 1% that’s trying to control the rest of us. They believe in order out of chaos meaning they will create a problem then swoop in with their psychotic solutions as if they are here to save the day.

  • @sweatypockets1923
    @sweatypockets1923 2 ปีที่แล้ว +701

    I live how at the end he turns it into something so wholesome and sweet.
    Also great video nicely explained.

    • @Pribumi1
      @Pribumi1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It would be very different ending if it was made by Kurzgezagt

    • @joem.3124
      @joem.3124 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@Pribumi1 kurzgezagt would've ended it by telling us how little meaning our lives have

    • @malvikapant7622
      @malvikapant7622 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I watched the whole video to agree with this comment

    • @30000sirmixalot
      @30000sirmixalot 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      almost cried :’)

    • @JoseAntonio-qe5hy
      @JoseAntonio-qe5hy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The funny thing is ppl believe what he says is true lol

  • @rynoX88
    @rynoX88 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I don't know what half the stuff he was talking about. But it was really interesting. This guy is very smart. Learned something new from this video.

  • @frowogy
    @frowogy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i absolutely did not expect this video to get so wholesome 😭

  • @mobiustrip1400
    @mobiustrip1400 2 ปีที่แล้ว +98

    When I was 3 or 4 and learning numbers, I was intrigued. I asked my dad what was the highest number and he answered "uncountable" How I marvelled at that word!!! He's gone now 11 years. Life is short. Don't try to find an answer. Life is not a "meaning" thing, it's a "happening" thing.

    • @karlmiller5009
      @karlmiller5009 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      My condolences on your loss. I feel your pain.

    • @Mavrik9000
      @Mavrik9000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Are you sure, the happenings have had meaning to you?
      Perhaps it is a philosophical conundrum?

    • @kidzbop38isstraightfire92
      @kidzbop38isstraightfire92 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Don't try to find an answer? What kind of gay advice is that?

    • @LairdPrydae
      @LairdPrydae 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@kidzbop38isstraightfire92 The kind people with no education cling to so that they don't feel overwhelmed by the vastness of what they do not know.

    • @deandeann1541
      @deandeann1541 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Mobius - Good advice. Humans worry "why?" while animals don't worry and just keep living as best as they can, no worries. The reason for life is in the living.

  • @tylersmall3169
    @tylersmall3169 2 ปีที่แล้ว +267

    What's most amazing to me is of all these shuffles possible in the world, all the unfathomable maths and statistical analysis possible of 52!
    My opponents still find a way to have a winning poker hand every DAMN TIME WE PLAY

    • @DirtyBobBojangles
      @DirtyBobBojangles ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ahhaha so funny 🫤

    • @petergriffin8767
      @petergriffin8767 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      probably cause you’re the type of player to play 6 8 off suit in early position

    • @kellychuba
      @kellychuba ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I learned card probability and applied it to video games to the point that I could sit in Atlantic city and play all day. I know Black jack players also trained by video games.

  • @Casey06
    @Casey06 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wasn’t expecting a pep talk at the end of this video, but thanks!

  • @spongebobcircle-pants
    @spongebobcircle-pants 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I almost cried at the end my view of the world has been changed u deserve a sub

  • @MattsCrazyArt
    @MattsCrazyArt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2365

    Phenomenal video. And I'm a youtube junkie who is rarely impressed by almost anything content creators make anymore.

    • @RGC_animation
      @RGC_animation 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What other video did you find good these days?

    • @randomdude9135
      @randomdude9135 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@RGC_animation 3b1b videos

    • @Bhatt_Hole
      @Bhatt_Hole 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@RGC_animation Spoderman, for sure.
      To call the Spoderman videos impressive or innovative would be an understatement of shocking proportions.

    • @Melanatedone
      @Melanatedone 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What!... a cat playing a piano isn't amazing!
      Isn't that the entire purpose of the internet 🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @LatvianNeO
      @LatvianNeO 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      You’re just depressed, my guy. We’ve all been there.

  • @rush1er
    @rush1er 2 ปีที่แล้ว +229

    "You are a once in a universe experience."
    My parents: FFS we hope so!

    • @MediumDSpeaks
      @MediumDSpeaks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ay yo Frisky Dingo!
      "I'll talk about the polls! *hangs up*
      HA! I was talking about MAH PENIS"

    • @Perririri
      @Perririri 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Fun fact: They had to fuck to make you!

    • @rush1er
      @rush1er 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MediumDSpeaks That's right, KILLFACE!

    • @rush1er
      @rush1er 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Perririri I once asked them if I was adopted and they replied in absolute disbelief:
      " Are you f&@king kidding?! NO you're no adopted, we would NEVER pick you on purpose!" Then they laughed and flicked their cigarette ashes at me. 🤡

    • @JustDaniel6764
      @JustDaniel6764 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rush1er You're parents sound like a right laugh.

  • @mmh1922
    @mmh1922 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Informative and enjoyable, thank you.

  • @lokop-bq3ov
    @lokop-bq3ov 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In case you had doubts,
    the width of the observable universe is around 93 billion light years, convert that into femtometer ( smallest unit for distance ) and you get...
    9 * 10^41 ( 9 followed by 41 zeroes )

  • @JS44444
    @JS44444 2 ปีที่แล้ว +78

    And yet, the house needs 4 or more decks to beat you at blackjack.

    • @revimfadli4666
      @revimfadli4666 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Jokes aside, suits don't matter, so duplicate ranks reduce the possibilities

    • @christianbrehm5398
      @christianbrehm5398 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Face cards are also all the same

    • @jimmyfrench4722
      @jimmyfrench4722 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not to beat you, to keep the advantage in house’s favor by a small degree.

  • @theimmux3034
    @theimmux3034 2 ปีที่แล้ว +225

    My absolute favourite way to put 52! into perspective is this: If Hawking radiation is true, 52! is just eight times larger than the lifespan of a stellar black hole in years.

    • @purgedsoy9518
      @purgedsoy9518 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      milky way 3 times less ATOMS than 52!, i was blown by that too.

    • @Wertsir
      @Wertsir 2 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      @@purgedsoy9518 However, by comparison, the number of particles in the universe is _4066000000000x_ greater than 52!
      Really puts things in perspective.

    • @shipshrekt2156
      @shipshrekt2156 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@Wertsir ddoes it xD

    • @deandeann1541
      @deandeann1541 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Tyler Duncan - You're off by one. You need to recount.

    • @chriswright9096
      @chriswright9096 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @Mother Rab I was going to say 10 packs of cards can be arranged in 520! ways. But that's actually wrong because there are repeats (ten queens of hearts for example).

  • @vivianwukmir4799
    @vivianwukmir4799 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Watched silently subtitles. You are a once in a lifetime experience. Can't instantly quote the rest of the sentence so make it count or do Your best.

  • @mate5791
    @mate5791 2 ปีที่แล้ว +524

    7:00 Imagine an infinite universe. The odds of you existing twice are astronomically low, but not zero. So in an infinite universe an exact copy of you would exist infinitely often. Every choice you took in life, an exact copy of you would have chosen a different path, infinitely often. Numbers like 52! are very hard to imagine, but the concept of infinity is just insane, if you think about it.

    • @trials6502
      @trials6502 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Not necessarily. We can see endless as an end. Where as 52 is somewhere high or low depending on perspective.

    • @PlzPr3sspl4y
      @PlzPr3sspl4y 2 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      @@trials6502 How exactly can you see 'endless as an end?' Sounds like a contradiction.

    • @charlesharrison4077
      @charlesharrison4077 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It’ll happen about once every 10^70 meters I think....

    • @charlesharrison4077
      @charlesharrison4077 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@PlzPr3sspl4y I’d say look at vsauce video about counting past infinity

    • @mate5791
      @mate5791 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@charlesharrison4077 You can count past infinity, but you’d have to use „other“ infinities that are bigger. For example there are more numbers between 0 and 1 then there are natural numbers (1,2,3,4,5,…), but both sets are infinite.
      Our odds for existing twice however are finite, so they will happen infinitely often in an infinitely large universe.

  • @pawnshot
    @pawnshot 2 ปีที่แล้ว +225

    The ending of the video made me happy. Never thought of myself as a once in a universe experience. That is truly special when you put it that way.

    • @odun5668
      @odun5668 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      It’s a tough day to be twins

    • @Aaron628318
      @Aaron628318 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Being a miserable sort I've always looked at it the other way. People pride themselves on being unique, but that's no more remarkable than shuffling a deck of cards, or even more dull, generating a UUID.

    • @I9s7lam5is-S3tu1pid
      @I9s7lam5is-S3tu1pid ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I praise You for I have been remarkably and wondrously made. Your works are wondrous, and I know this very well.
      Psalm 139:4

    • @flytyme
      @flytyme ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Aaron628318 I am going to agree. A difference that makes no difference is no difference.

    • @nikwhitbord8454
      @nikwhitbord8454 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If the universe is truly infinite there's TONS of instances of you watching this same video with differences so miniscule, you couldnt even notice. So yeah, you exactly as you are is a once in a universe occurrence, but there's infinite versions of you exactly as you are right now, with just +1 or -1 cell.

  • @NoOffenseAnimation
    @NoOffenseAnimation 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I like how this went from a video about numbers to quite a heart warming message at the end

    • @Scott100W
      @Scott100W 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It went from being interesting to being some cookie cutter birthday card drivel.

  • @joshfrancis9903
    @joshfrancis9903 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    beautiful video man!

  • @KnightmarePhoenix_official
    @KnightmarePhoenix_official ปีที่แล้ว +435

    I thought he was just really enthusiastic about 52
    Edit: I've never been particularly into math, but dang. This video makes me appreciate numbers more. This is really cool.

    • @cherpsy3770
      @cherpsy3770 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      Here is another way to visualize it, (from the sauce) so lets say you start a timer counting down from 52 factorial seconds, so in 52 factorial seconds the timer will end. so now lets see how long that is, first imagine you are standing on the equator. now stand there for 1 billion years, then take a single step foward. wait another billion years and take another one. eventually after countless years you walk across the entire earth and end up back ftom where you came from. so now after wslking acrosd the entire earth, take a single droplet from the pacific ocean and remove it. now continue this process intill you have completely drained the entire pacific ocean, now that you have done that, place a single piece of paper on the floor and put all the water back in the ocean. then continue the process, eventually your stack of paper will have reached the sun, now reset everything and do it 1000 times, and after all the time you still have 2/3 of the thr time on your countdown remaining.

    • @kurtwpg
      @kurtwpg 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Take out one suit of 13 cards and run it by itself. 6.227 BILLION combinations, almost one for every person on Earth.

    • @sswulffable
      @sswulffable 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Even More fun when you can actually produce a Real number you can both comprehend, understand and has a real world application -

  • @user-uo1kp3uh1u
    @user-uo1kp3uh1u 2 ปีที่แล้ว +974

    Being a scientist myself I can still only say: This clip is probably one of the best on the whole plattform. It's pretty difficult to connect statistical probabilities to average Joe's perception of life, and still here you not only succeed in this, but also manage to make it an easy entry into a philisophical concept. Even though I could do those numbers myself I never realized that the permutations of a card deck vastly outnumber those things we usually see as infinite (or random). We can only admit our insignificance and lack of wisdom when we already fail at realizing the complexity of a card game.
    Sorry for spelling errors - English is not my native language.

    • @cedartheyeah.justyeah.3967
      @cedartheyeah.justyeah.3967 2 ปีที่แล้ว +66

      You made no spelling errors, my friend.

    • @aarongregory4980
      @aarongregory4980 2 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      For someone who’s not a native English speaker you conveyed your thoughts very elegantly. Had you not mentioned it nobody would have noticed. Quite honestly your grammar and vocabulary are better than the majority of native speakers myself included lol.

    • @pratikchandraIC
      @pratikchandraIC 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@aarongregory4980 your* 👉👈🥺

    • @LavaSaver
      @LavaSaver 2 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      This is literally the '"sorry about my English" *speaks in immaculate English'* meme

    • @kstoeb
      @kstoeb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      I can understand that probably unnecessary apology all too well. English isn’t my native language, too, and especially if you tend to be careful with your words, there is always this slight insecurity. English has so many idiomatic expressions that I‘m always afraid of making an unintended pun. And because we (in Germany) were taught British English, but I see American English every day, I am really confused about the spelling sometimes. And - as you may have recognized already - I have no clue about commas and just put them where they would be in German ;-)

  • @ThePredilection
    @ThePredilection 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Holy hell that was way better than I thought it would be

  • @dragoda
    @dragoda 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One of my favorite video on the internet.

  • @jamiesmith4293
    @jamiesmith4293 2 ปีที่แล้ว +235

    When you talked about the snowflakes, I remembered an argument I had with someone that in order for no 2 snowflakes to be alike, there would have to be an intelligent force in the universe to prevent it. The other person was mistaking an amazingly low chance with an intentionally zero chance. 2 snowflakes CAN be alike, maybe even at the same time, but forget it... you won't find them.

    • @TrueBlueYZ
      @TrueBlueYZ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Spot on Jamie. And possibly the same with humans and everything else in the observable universe if the universe is infinite. Which no one knows or probably ever will.

    • @zikof5646
      @zikof5646 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@serraramayfield9230 I want to see it... *now*

    • @serraramayfield9230
      @serraramayfield9230 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @David Montgomery Fair, will delete comment

    • @burtan2000
      @burtan2000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Like how two people can actually have matching DNA. The chances are like one in a billion. Well, there are seven billion people, so....
      Or the mother and son who learned their DNA didn't match as being related. She gave birth to him. He was DEFINTELY her son. But it was just one of those things that are far beyond a reasonable doubt, even beyond an UNREASONABLE doubt yet still occur from time to time.
      The incredibly unlikely MUST still occur sometimes, else it'd not be unlikely it'd be impossible.
      That's why I reject the very premise of this video. I've heard that BS before: "it's impossible that two properly shuffled decks of cards would ever in human history result in matching sequence"
      It is MOST CERTAINLY NOT IMPOSSIBLE. We cannot call HIGHLY UNLIKELY things Impossible. It's not "infinite" from any perspective. Infinity is INFITELY greater than 52 factorial. it's INFITELY greater than 1000!
      One can segment any amount into an infinite number of parts. One can half something over and over again, long past the cows coming home, past the heat death of the universe, and still have half of some quantity remaining.
      So infinity exists between 0 and 1. Infinity exists between 0.5 and 1.0.
      But if there is a Plank's constant i think it's called - if there is a smallest possible unit, then things are not inifinite and infinity doesn't exist because t his is a simulation. A simulated universe with finite resources. Finite amount of pixels. A finite amount of atoms with a finite amount of energy so many we are in a sim

    • @ENCHANTMEN_
      @ENCHANTMEN_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Depends on how you define "alike". Two snowflakes could be similar to the point where it'd be hard to tell them apart, but if you require them to be identical down to a quantum scale it's impossible.

  • @edog6324
    @edog6324 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just found your channel and have now subscribed. Love you visualization and explanations

  • @thebluespider8545
    @thebluespider8545 2 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    "They'll never be something exactly like you again." - Oh thank God

  • @vmshastri4983
    @vmshastri4983 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is just mind blowing! I have underestimated the law of large numbers

  • @anginas363
    @anginas363 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    It’s funny to say 52 is my lucky number, and I have been looking for its meaning for so long, it’s crazy how in so many random videos that there are on TH-cam, they had to recommend me this one.

    • @brodie3088
      @brodie3088 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You are the chosen one

    • @shiwoshiwoismyactualname
      @shiwoshiwoismyactualname 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Imagine being raised in a world where science exists, yet people still believe in magic numbers

  • @jaydale3814
    @jaydale3814 2 ปีที่แล้ว +383

    "52! Is practically infinity"
    Adventure Capitalist: Cute, hold my zeros

    • @HeyImHakim
      @HeyImHakim 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@fredriksvard2603 it's a game

    • @snaukball8764
      @snaukball8764 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Antimatter dimensions gets you to like...
      1e200000+

    • @snaukball8764
      @snaukball8764 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      e200000 being *10^200000

    • @abc-cq7dw
      @abc-cq7dw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@snaukball8764 in ng+3 it gets you to 10^10^18 (10^1 quintillion)

    • @codycast
      @codycast 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whoa. I remember that game. Used to play it till I realized that the # involved would take longer then the age of the universe to beat

  • @adithyapvarma8738
    @adithyapvarma8738 2 ปีที่แล้ว +161

    I love it when mathematicians who are involved with trying to understand the magnanimity of things, finish up with advising us to appreciate the universe for the wonder that it is.

    • @I9s7lam5is-S3tu1pid
      @I9s7lam5is-S3tu1pid ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I praise You for I have been remarkably and wondrously made. Your works are wondrous, and I know this very well.
      Psalm 139:4

    • @ENGLISHISBEST
      @ENGLISHISBEST ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I am amazed how far we have developed when I visit my family tree. I wonder will my descendants looking back be shocked & upset at the way we left the world.

    • @SalimSivaad
      @SalimSivaad ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s not what *magnanimity* means: you’re looking for *magnitude*

  • @joeface448
    @joeface448 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That last part got me. Wasn’t expecting it

  • @B-RollBooks
    @B-RollBooks 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That ending hits nicely. Well done.

  • @Cocytus127
    @Cocytus127 2 ปีที่แล้ว +386

    Now just imagine the protons and neutrons across the universe and understand how 52! is also effectively zero.

    • @PlzPr3sspl4y
      @PlzPr3sspl4y 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Good point.

    • @calebroberts08
      @calebroberts08 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Grahams number bro

    • @RGC_animation
      @RGC_animation 2 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      Fun Fact: There are only about 10^82 atoms in the observable universe, still incomprehensible large, but it's start to become very small when dealing with combinations. Combinations is the key to creating big numbers.

    • @OatmealTheCrazy
      @OatmealTheCrazy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@RGC_animation ez, (10^82)!

    • @RGC_animation
      @RGC_animation 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@OatmealTheCrazy Hmm?

  • @Daekanoid
    @Daekanoid ปีที่แล้ว +1131

    You are the true heir of the old vsauce videos. I've had the exact same feeling watching this. You're an upcoming star

    • @burpie3258
      @burpie3258 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      This comment convinced me to subscribe to the channel ❤

    • @kenneyjake
      @kenneyjake ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I love the vibe to this video. I wish more people appreciated this sort of beat.

    • @DrVonNostrand
      @DrVonNostrand ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Hey Michael, Vsauce here

    • @Ruleof2Review
      @Ruleof2Review ปีที่แล้ว +15

      I was expecting to hear “and as always…thanks for watching” at the end and I felt unfulfilled when I didn’t lol.

    • @ozlanden
      @ozlanden ปีที่แล้ว +7

      That’s because this is almost verbatim a vsauce video over the exact same thing

  • @CountryCowboy008
    @CountryCowboy008 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It’s amazing how unique people can be. Imagine that - ALL the times that you’ve shuffled a card, the orders in which they end up every time you shuffle them are uniquely yours; nobody has done it before and after other than YOU. Wow.

  • @xoliswamutambala5622
    @xoliswamutambala5622 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This rally made me smile.

  • @rantnhnaketon
    @rantnhnaketon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +376

    I once read a story in which the man who invented chess was invited by a king to his palace, and offered any reward he wants for creating such a beautiful game. The man asks the king to just give him grains of wheat. But since it is for his game of chess, he wanted the grains of wheat to be measured in such an order. For the first square of the chessboard, give him 1 grain of wheat. For the 2nd square, give him 2×1 grains of wheat. For the 3rd, give him 3×2×1 grains of wheat. And carry on in such a way until the 64th square of the chessboard.
    The king accepts and even ridicules him. Says that the sack of wheat will be sent to him by sundown. But it doesn't get sent for days. Finally, the king is informed by his subject that there isn't enough grain in the kingdom to give to the man. In fact, even if the whole earth was planted with wheat and farmed, there STILL wouldn't be enough grain to give to the man.
    Finally the king goes to the man's home humbled, and the man accepts him as his chess disciple.

    • @connorawalsh
      @connorawalsh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      This needs to be noticed

    • @Mimi-vv9gz
      @Mimi-vv9gz ปีที่แล้ว +49

      small correction, it was 2^ (each square) every day, so 2 grains in day 1, 4 in day 2... 1024 grains in day 10, etc. by the time they got to the 20s it was impossible.

    • @rantnhnaketon
      @rantnhnaketon ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@Mimi-vv9gz no. The story i read was aiming to teach the reader about factorials. While the version you have read is also certainly quite interesting, it is not the one i read.

    • @irchadesfacuze2885
      @irchadesfacuze2885 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      I'm completely in agreement with @@Mimi-vv9gz
      I've also read a story of a mathematician who asked for the king to have a grain of wheat placed upon each square of a board with sixty-four total squares such that each square would double the number from the previous square By the time they got to half the board they would already be at 2 billion grains of wheat, which is the equivalent to the grains of sand enough to cover two sandy beaches. But even if you were to take every grain of sand on earth, you wouldn't be capable of meeting the mathematician's requirements. All in all, to meet those requirements you'd have to gather all the sand grains of two planets earth and make that the equivalent of wheat grains you'd have to give to the mathematician.
      That mathematician is said to be the creator of the chess game (but this seems more like a legend to me)

    • @hammer.11011
      @hammer.11011 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Chess was created in India and there's no such story there

  • @awesomewrecker0
    @awesomewrecker0 2 ปีที่แล้ว +116

    People tend to forget how quickly multiplying by 10 makes things larger, 8x10^4 is a packed football game, 8x10^5 is city, 8x10^7 is a country, 8x10^9 is the global population, think about that big a difference is just 5 zeros, then do that 11 more times. The ratio of 8x10^59 to 8x10^64 is the same as the ratio of a football game to the global population, 8x10^59 is almost nothing, it's 0.00001 x. That's one cent to $1000

    • @seand0112
      @seand0112 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A more simple way to see how multiplying by 10 makes things way bigger
      100000x10 is basically double it 200k double it 400k double it 800k make a new 200k and at it on

    • @louisrobitaille5810
      @louisrobitaille5810 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@seand0112 Uh, this doesn't make sense...

    • @louisrobitaille5810
      @louisrobitaille5810 ปีที่แล้ว

      Humans aren't good at understanding exponent scales and numbers. 2 is pretty intuitive, it's just binary. Add a 0 to the right whenever you double the number. 10 is pretty intuitive, just add a 0 to the right whenever you decuple the number. Even though the numbers themselves are intuitive, the physical representations are impossibly hard to vidualize. Just coming up with original examples is hard 😅.

    • @nofurtherwest3474
      @nofurtherwest3474 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The video is a bit wrong though. Because it depends on the state of the cards when you shuffle and how you shuffle.
      For example. Are you talking about a new pack of cards?
      If so, then they start in the exact same order. So if you apply the exact same shuffling technique to the exact same brand new deck of cards then the odds are not as rare as 52!.
      So the video is misleading.
      The video is not addressing real life shuffling. But rather just the mathematical possible combinations of the cards.

    • @iwannaseenow1
      @iwannaseenow1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@nofurtherwest3474 your second paragraph doesn't describe a random shuffle. You are basically ordering the new deck in a specific way.

  • @BloodHawk31
    @BloodHawk31 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is incredible, I want to start a study at college and test the theory. It is a realistic statistic, and it says your chances are i.e. 1:10, but what if certain situations have an effect on your choice of cards. I am in Engineering, so looking at a 1:100 year flooding, we know that it'll happen in that period, same with the earthquake in Turkey, but what about external weather conditions, perhaps they can narrow down the chance of that event to a 1:50 or 1:10 chance, meabing we can predict when a large event will happen closer to the time, it might open possibilities to predict major risks before they happen, but nature and math can get complicated, its easy to lose yourself in complex statistics when it is easier to keep it simple, but who wants to keep it simple if you can find knowledge😅

  • @Gr33n_Code
    @Gr33n_Code 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Never let them know your next move…
    “53!”

  • @discobiscuits2100
    @discobiscuits2100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +170

    Lochness Monsta: “So ima need a little more than tree-fiddy”

    • @scrappymark
      @scrappymark 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @shanejknox
      @shanejknox 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I thought the same shit when i saw
      Tree fitty
      🤣

    • @imhulki463
      @imhulki463 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Is this a reference to a video?

    • @shanejknox
      @shanejknox 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@imhulki463
      South park
      Lochness monster episode
      Season 3 episode 3

    • @falecomnetto
      @falecomnetto 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I was looking for this reply! Thansk