Bradley literally saved my song, it was done as best as I could have, but the man has insane objectivity and experience, and noone else would have done it better. More of Bradley please! Love
I am sure far most agree with me here. When width is created via sends, it tolerates mono greatly - no phasing issues what so ever. It does in worst case just disappear in mono, or attenuated. If one creates width let's say from the whole bus/channel itself, it can often sound terrible in mono. Sends for width is pretty much the best and only way to go.
@@djucef-raideluxe9879 Instead of insert/s on the channel or bus, he sends the vocal for making width like one would send to reverb or delay. A "width-send". These widening-processes will NEVER degrade the mid when mono'ing.
there are times where I will even put reverb as an insert before compression, it almost gives the same effect as using a reverb as a send with compression side chained off the vocal. Makes the reverb bloom a bit when the singing cuts out, and pulls it back when the singing comes in again
YES! 💯, I sometimes add the reverb as an insert on the vocal mix buss and just blend in ever so slightly as well, then you can do some cool fx parts with all vocals
I think im missing something- No EQ at all on the dry vocal signal? i get so much bass and mid-low build up i gotta notch out a good amount. Or literally only EQ the parallel?
Hey I’m having an issue so I got the parralel compression going and idk why but my vocals seem super loud still clear tho should I lower them on the mix bus ? Put a limiter on the vocals themselves , or just lower the parralel compression
Good tutorial but I think we would really benefit from some gain-matching since the 'After' result is louder. The before is just too quiet in comparison to make any real assumptions about what this chain is doing right. Obviously adding compression and doubling and reverb is going to help a vocal stand out from the mix and its clear that that's being achieved, but then again so would raising it's gain, so subjectively I think it can get hairy without giving us a loudness-matched reference.
Wow I’ve been interning with a dude that’s in the industry and the way you just broke this song down makes me look at my current template and sigh 😭I use the exact same plugins but just in a different way that’s more complicated than what u just did
@@RadiumRecordsHollywood If you do a Garth impersonation in a video I will subscribe to your channel. Heck you'd probably get a lot of viewers that way.
I don't get how his parallel compression is level matched - when I do this in ableton the whole vocal gets significantly louder and then it beomes a game of blending it
Great question! I would set the release to the performance of the vocal 100% of the time... If you have a fast rap vocal, going faster on the release will allow it to pump to the vocal phrasing. There's no hard/ fast rule here, just hit the compressor hard to hear it, then set the release to where it sounds most musical to you.
I don't care about gain reduction meter, I compress that thing till it sounds to my ears. On the parallel comp, oh I just pin that dude! Btw on my consumer Bluetooth speaker, the vocal is still buried in this tutorial, just saying 🤷🏾♂️.
@@tunetitan4717 I record with just a touch of compression and some de-essing on the way in… There might be a little EQ, but it’s probably just a high pass filter at 100 or so and maybe some cut at 200-400
You don't always have to EQ things just to EQ things. Some tracks don't require treatment at all, including compression. This is also a testament to the thought put into the "front end." If you get it right at the source, then you don't have to "fix it in the mix."
That's not what the "chromatic" setting does on Tune Real-time. At all. And I'm listening to this on my mono phone backstage. Sure It's 2024, but when your voice disappears on someone's phone, you lose. It's CRAZY easy to do a mono check on your mix. Parallel comp is a good tool. Inserting reverb on the channel is also a good tool.
@@RadiumRecordsHollywood Yeah, sure, but the "Chromatic" setting doesn't give it a "less-locked feel bla bla." That's a "Speed' function. "Chromatic" is useful if you don't know and don't care what key it's in, and are singing less than a quarter step away from the intended note, or the melody doesn't adhere to a modal scale, and you just want to set it and forget it, not insert the plugin on the timeline per key center.
@@habeuscorpuscle That's literally EXACTLY what it does... It makes it so the notes correct to a "chromatic scale" instead of a 7 note scale like a major/ minor scale. A chromatic scale is a 12 note scale, how many notes are in an octave? I don't see why this is hard to understand... I'm not trying to be rude at all, I just truly don't understand your comment.
Chromatic settings actually gives it a less locked feel, and it retains flexibility for the passing notes to excel. Nothing up for argument here bruh, it's ABC.
@@RadiumRecordsHollywood efinition. The chromatic scale is a musical scale with twelve pitches, each a semitone, also known as a half-step, above or below its adjacent pitches. As a result, in 12-tone equal temperament (the most common tuning in Western music), the chromatic scale covers all 12 of the available pitches.- so you could've clicked any of the letters of the alphabet and it wouldnt have made an impact on the interaction with the key of the song because its just tuning for all 12 notes anyway - on an already pitch corrected vocal
@@RadiumRecordsHollywood Glad you haven't lost your sense of humour :D Maybe I'll be in your league someday and can come back to review this and it will be more useful by then ;-)
I literally never thought to use a parallel EQ bus, ever.
True game changer
Bradley literally saved my song, it was done as best as I could have, but the man has insane objectivity and experience, and noone else would have done it better. More of Bradley please! Love
YO!! ❤❤ That’s super nice man, I appreciate you.
@@RadiumRecordsHollywood my brother!
@@Shiyegood to see you here my guy!
This song actually doesn’t get old during the playback. Well done sir. Catchy
That’s what’s up 🫡
I am sure far most agree with me here. When width is created via sends, it tolerates mono greatly - no phasing issues what so ever. It does in worst case just disappear in mono, or attenuated. If one creates width let's say from the whole bus/channel itself, it can often sound terrible in mono. Sends for width is pretty much the best and only way to go.
Love doing it this way and have for over 10 years now… No complaints!
Could you please, explain to me what do you mean by "created via sends" ?
@@djucef-raideluxe9879 Instead of insert/s on the channel or bus, he sends the vocal for making width like one would send to reverb or delay. A "width-send". These widening-processes will NEVER degrade the mid when mono'ing.
Great way to smooth out the vocal without losing clarity and cut!
Hope it helps!
Enjoyed this, took away some new tips/game and confirmations, thanks!
Cheers fam!
Thanks for the pointers my dude! Very interesting to see the techniques and the before and after! EPIC!
Cheers! Hope it was helpful!
Every day is a school day. Thanks. ;)
Let’s go!! 📚
there are times where I will even put reverb as an insert before compression, it almost gives the same effect as using a reverb as a send with compression side chained off the vocal. Makes the reverb bloom a bit when the singing cuts out, and pulls it back when the singing comes in again
YES! 💯, I sometimes add the reverb as an insert on the vocal mix buss and just blend in ever so slightly as well, then you can do some cool fx parts with all vocals
@@RadiumRecordsHollywood absolutely! love your energy, keep up the great work
@@ArielChobaz A lot more coming... Stay tuned.
Great video. I noticed there wasn’t any mid/side processing and it still sounds great. Iv always felt like it’s a necessity to get the vocals sit in.
Using the widening really helps with that, as it is really a M/S process...
Incredible! And his energy is A1👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
Cheers fam! Appreciate you
Amazing from Bradley as usual
Thank you Sir for some valuable tips!❤
Really hope they help!
Great contribution. 💯🇹🇹
hey!! Cheers!
Waves plugins remind me of 90s and 2000s
Love it. Waves been around longer than any of these other companies
When the Diamond bundle was 5,000 😂☠️
You know your stuff man appreciate the tips do you have any hip hop tutorials?
Cheers! Check out the page, plenty of mixing/ mastering stuff...
thanks for sharing your experience, top !
Hey! With pleasure.
Greaaaaaat, thanks Bradley
As soon as he said eating those cheeseburgers I took a bite out of a cheeseburger lol
Yo! Timing on point. 🍔
@@RadiumRecordsHollywood fr lol
Great tips!
Cheers!
For vocal parallel compression, are you using a Mono Bus or a Stereo Bus? Assuming the Vocal Thickener would be on a stereo bus?
I usually use stereo busses… mono->stereo on the return
This is genius.. sound is fire 🔥.. BUT WHAT IS THAT SONG? HOW CAN I FIND IT ? 🔥🔥🔥🔥
Cheers fam! "Haunted By You" - Bradley Denniston, enjoy!
This guy looks 30 and 70 at the same time
LMAO!
😂😂 Haha
😂 this guy is a genius
Now that we know who the class clown is can we get back to this dope mixing classes he’s teaching us?
He is 40 😂
Great Tutorials.
Hope it’s helpful!
looove this one
BAM! ❤️
good vid - very helpful
Cheers! Happy to help!
Well done
I think im missing something- No EQ at all on the dry vocal signal? i get so much bass and mid-low build up i gotta notch out a good amount. Or literally only EQ the parallel?
Amazing❤
Thanks for stopping by!
Inspired by Dave Pensado 👏
Pensado is a true legend!
This was so useful! Maybe a dumb question but I´m new to this, this is for the vocals for the whole song or just the chorus?
Can work for either of them. Depends on each vocal, of course!
cheers! Wherever you're having issues with your vocals "getting lost" in the mix, this will help them stay on top.
Hey I’m having an issue so I got the parralel compression going and idk why but my vocals seem super loud still clear tho should I lower them on the mix bus ? Put a limiter on the vocals themselves , or just lower the parralel compression
Just lower the parallel comp to taste... Balance between the direct signal and parallel
My mix had phasing issues, please help 😢 idk what i did wrong
Check all your parallel returns, solo them out against your direct signal..
I love it
Cheers!
Hey peeps, was the reverb placed directly on the track or via bus? Just wanted to make sure
Directly on the vocal track!
Sounds similar to take on me by a ha
That’s dope.
thank you so much
Hey! Hope it helps!
Good tutorial but I think we would really benefit from some gain-matching since the 'After' result is louder. The before is just too quiet in comparison to make any real assumptions about what this chain is doing right. Obviously adding compression and doubling and reverb is going to help a vocal stand out from the mix and its clear that that's being achieved, but then again so would raising it's gain, so subjectively I think it can get hairy without giving us a loudness-matched reference.
This is greattttttt
Hope it was helpful!
@@RadiumRecordsHollywood It is super helpful man, I subbed
What is the engineer's name ? Seems like Waves didn't credited him
Bradley Denniston! You can find his instagram here: instagram.com/bradleyhd/
@@waves thx u !!
Hey! Cheers! 🫡
Why didnt you put the reverb 100 percent wet since it was a send?
The RVerb is inserted, just as I explained in the video.
Wow I’ve been interning with a dude that’s in the industry and the way you just broke this song down makes me look at my current template and sigh 😭I use the exact same plugins but just in a different way that’s more complicated than what u just did
Hope it's helpful!
This is Dana Carvey being Butch Vig
LMAO! So good...
ur a genius
NO RVOX????????? How come brother?
What kind of microphone is that you using
Neumann TLM 103
@@RadiumRecordsHollywood great video that mic sound amazing
@@ritla4169Thanks fam! Hope it’s helpful
@@RadiumRecordsHollywood do you have any videos on how to get that type of sound with any kind of mic
@@ritla4169 I've published over 1,300 videos on my youtube alone, I'm sure there's some stuff in there to help!
Wow, I'm just getting Dana Carvey Wayne's World vibes here. Just me? Huh.
Asphincter says what?
😂😂 thanks!! #legend
@@universalearthling3227😂 classic
@@universalearthling3227 What? 😏
@@RadiumRecordsHollywood If you do a Garth impersonation in a video I will subscribe to your channel. Heck you'd probably get a lot of viewers that way.
We're not mixing for mono anymore.
Sonos enters the chat.
I don't get how his parallel compression is level matched - when I do this in ableton the whole vocal gets significantly louder and then it beomes a game of blending it
Send 100% to your parallel, then blend in the return.
@@SDOTPOPPA Cheers fam!
Wats the name of this song is it out yet??
“Haunted By You” - Bradley Denniston… Tap in and enjoy!
I noticed you were leaving in the vocal breaths..... reason ?
Performance… I don’t like overly processed stuff, this song needed that “desperation” in the voice
So it sounds like a human did it and not a robot lol
@@TenMinusNineYES! That’s one reason… 😢
John Lennon LOVED breaths, gum chewing smacks, weird nasal exhales - gives a vocal character and life! Keep it in! 👍
@@bradashlockGotta keep that human element poppin
S1 always makes me feel like the proximity and closeness of the vocal is instantly GONE
like the adlibs sound more coherent with an s1 on a main tbh
@@SDOTPOPPA Dude do you think im an idiot thats exactly what im talking about not widening it, bringing it mono, it sounds like absolute shit
Would you recomend to use a faster release in the parallel 1176 if you use it on rap vocals or would you still keep it that slow? 9:22
Great question! I would set the release to the performance of the vocal 100% of the time... If you have a fast rap vocal, going faster on the release will allow it to pump to the vocal phrasing. There's no hard/ fast rule here, just hit the compressor hard to hear it, then set the release to where it sounds most musical to you.
What website did you use for this?
Sorry, I don't understand this question...
@@RadiumRecordsHollywood what did you use for your vocals what website is that?
I preferred the before it felt more vibey
cool
Bradley as James Brown used to say “you are super bad”.
😂 Damn, I love JB
hearing this in my 2$ ear buds :D
Sweet! Where can I get eat buds for $2?
I don't care about gain reduction meter, I compress that thing till it sounds to my ears. On the parallel comp, oh I just pin that dude! Btw on my consumer Bluetooth speaker, the vocal is still buried in this tutorial, just saying 🤷🏾♂️.
Salute
Cheers! Thanks for stopping by
💪✔️💯
Let’s go!!!
This popped up in my notifications as 4 minutes ago, I see comets from 7 days ago. Can someone please explain to me what's going on?!?! 🤔🤯🤷🤔
I think it was live on Waves website before it went live here on TH-cam…
Video was embedded on our website ;)
@@wavesBTW,a master-class video,right here👍
💪🏽🫡
As soon as he said get some tuning going I wanted to click away.
Yea, we don't all love things being "in tune", but I find that most listeners do.
Beach music I swear
I feel it
Huh? He doesn’t even EQ his vocals? Hard to believe this.
You heard it… It’s all in the video!
A good mic and a well treated recording room, need no much eq
@@tunetitan4717 I NEVER thought about that....omg thank you o much
@@tunetitan4717 I record with just a touch of compression and some de-essing on the way in… There might be a little EQ, but it’s probably just a high pass filter at 100 or so and maybe some cut at 200-400
You don't always have to EQ things just to EQ things. Some tracks don't require treatment at all, including compression. This is also a testament to the thought put into the "front end." If you get it right at the source, then you don't have to "fix it in the mix."
That's not what the "chromatic" setting does on Tune Real-time. At all. And I'm listening to this on my mono phone backstage. Sure It's 2024, but when your voice disappears on someone's phone, you lose. It's CRAZY easy to do a mono check on your mix. Parallel comp is a good tool. Inserting reverb on the channel is also a good tool.
I’m well aware of what “chromatic” scales are… Thanks!
@@RadiumRecordsHollywood Yeah, sure, but the "Chromatic" setting doesn't give it a "less-locked feel bla bla." That's a "Speed' function. "Chromatic" is useful if you don't know and don't care what key it's in, and are singing less than a quarter step away from the intended note, or the melody doesn't adhere to a modal scale, and you just want to set it and forget it, not insert the plugin on the timeline per key center.
@@habeuscorpuscle That's literally EXACTLY what it does... It makes it so the notes correct to a "chromatic scale" instead of a 7 note scale like a major/ minor scale. A chromatic scale is a 12 note scale, how many notes are in an octave? I don't see why this is hard to understand... I'm not trying to be rude at all, I just truly don't understand your comment.
Chromatic settings actually gives it a less locked feel, and it retains flexibility for the passing notes to excel. Nothing up for argument here bruh, it's ABC.
@@RadiumRecordsHollywood efinition. The chromatic scale is a musical scale with twelve pitches, each a semitone, also known as a half-step, above or below its adjacent pitches. As a result, in 12-tone equal temperament (the most common tuning in Western music), the chromatic scale covers all 12 of the available pitches.- so you could've clicked any of the letters of the alphabet and it wouldnt have made an impact on the interaction with the key of the song because its just tuning for all 12 notes anyway - on an already pitch corrected vocal
Too much and too fast to be useful for me. ...Is that a fake moustache?
Sorry to disappoint you. I glued the mustache on myself. Appreciate your AMAZING comment, super helpful for everyone.
@@RadiumRecordsHollywood Glad you haven't lost your sense of humour :D Maybe I'll be in your league someday and can come back to review this and it will be more useful by then ;-)
@@lar57jsy honestly, I make this content to help… I truly hope it does, there’s more beginner and intermediate stuff on my TH-cam if you need help
I put it on x.5 speed , easier to understand!
@@bazrico9945 good look!
wery bad 🤬 there were very bad phases