This video took forever to make and edit. The weather was just awful for almost the entire week. The rain turned the range into a giant mud pit. Walking anywhere would cake your shoes into giant mud clogs. The cold did not help either. Fortunately, Steve and Jake maintained solid motivation to get the rockets made and videos filmed. Steve is hard at work with the mk 3 variant of the rockets now that fresh data on what works and what does not is collected from our testing.
Have you though to add a small section of metal tubing into the wire guide on the rockets to keep them on the wire instead of sawing through and flying off in random directions?
It's easier to use a recoilless system as a shoulder fired munition. Easier to have calculated ballistics and interchangeable war heads. Rockets favor best when you up the scale past 120mm or larger. So... Rocket favor mounted platforms, Hydra, hailstorm, and tornado rockets... They also do best of soft ignition moving platforms like aircraft, think of the old HVAR rockets
I know the feeling. I am an 07/02 SOT and anytime I talk or show my machine guns I made I get people telling me they are gonna report me to the feds. Go for it lmao. I pay them every year to have a piece of paper. Great video!
Better late than never! This video took a while as I had a ton of videos to work through. We launched 21 rockets and ran almost 5 cameras, so it ate up a ton of space on my jump drive. Steve and I compiled a great deal of data from these tests to work on an improved rocket design. Soon, the final project will be complete and we can move onto world domination. NBD
suspend the motor on the front..make like a split yoke design to hold it in the middle on the nose and a wedge under the nozzle with grooves running to the back of the rocket to make the thrust gas bypass the actuall body ...add stabilising X-shape winglets on the back of the rocket atleast as far as the main body lenght...also the grooves that allow the thrust gas to travel from the front of the rocket to the back can be slightly twisted so it adds some spin stabilization...if you make few of rockets where the trailing winglets also have a twist to them..each instance more and more you should be able to dial the twist rate and make it compliment the thrust grooves twist rate, using some high speed footage in like 5 rockets..while i havent seen this design being used anywhere and considering that diverting the gasses around the rocket to the back of it will result in some thrust loss and the pressure it will create in the front of the launcher will also impact exit speed this should work..would work even better if 4 small thrusters are used in an angled diverging thrust nose cone assembly - thats if you can reliably activate them in the same time. if you want more ideas id love to share and help develop them..if you really get down to work you can even print them in vase mode xD
Man you can see the frustration in Steve’s face don’t be too down man shits bad ass and obviously will work as intended just need a few things tweaked to get them perfect can’t wait to see the next video with 3d printed ordance and d&s creations
Clearly, the next improvement in tank technology should be hovertanks so the rockets just scoot right under them! :D Appreciate the video kind sirs, will be calling off Europol this time.
@@alcokoalco9278 We could argue about those kinds of lies pushed upon the Russian people by the Putin government until the cows come home. But neither of us will come to any kind of agreement, and arguing about it will do nothing to change the unfortunate international situation we find ourselves in. So why bother?
@@theKashConnoisseur What about the lies of the American government? For example, about the non-expansion of NATO to the east to the borders of the Russian Federation. Fu..ing American double standards
@@alcokoalco9278 Why did you delete your previous comment? Edit: Never mind, TH-cam is being weird. Arguing about each other's governments lies and crimes is pointless. It does nothing to stop either government from doing the things they do. So why bother? Everyone knows that all governments suck, in general. Treaties are made to be broken.
The "undesireable flight path" from the second to last shot on the durable target was actually quite clean - Very little spiraling, looked as if all the fins had deployed properly on the way out, and it had a smooth loft, just so much it went over the intended target. Has D&S tried running these through a software like OpenFOAM to test aerodynamic stability? It could lend some handy clues and reduce the number of physical iterations required to get repeatable results.
@@DandSCreations Fair enough. That one dude though, with the Panzerfaust, Fliegerfaust, and now an M202 builds some kickass rockets. He's also working on a man portable hypervelocity rocket launcher lol, excited for that one
personal advice would be to simplify the rockets. While cool the folding fin designs require alot more precision in opening then traditional fixed fin designs. Perhaps try a mortar style rocket that way it seats well in the barrel, if youre worried about not producing enough drag for stabilization then use thicker fins or bend the edges. Also try using a aluminum lining for the inside of your launch tube. This will add rigidity, protect from open flame, and absorb heat.
When I saw that wire guide system, I knew immediately that there was no way you were hitting that target 😂 It seems so straight forward, pull the wire taught, attach the rocket and you're good to go, but rockets do not like to be constrained, they are made to fly, and fly they will. Up, down, about, around or apart, but only with exquisite care will they fly true. The deploying fins working correctly was quite impressive though! I look forward to further experimentation and testing. Any video with fire in it is a good video, successful projects are just a bonus 😂
Of all the complaints people might make, I wonder how many will be mad you used a Z tank as a target. So how do you fix the wire chewing through the plastic hanger, use a metal pipe segment as a liner?
Pleeeeaaaaseeee make more rocket launcher videos!!! I don’t have extra money at the moment to send to support the channel. But this is by far the best channel on TH-cam. I enjoy every second of the launcher episodes you guys make. I really would love to see you guys perfect it. I remember the first rocket episode when you guys shot the panel off the door 🤣😭
Pucker factor on the first one is tighter than a black hole singularity. It's like firing an arrow straight up like we did when we were kids, but the arrow can still kill you even if it misses.
I'd personally love to see ordnance lab test a bunch of the 3d defcad files. they have a bunch of "improvised" explosives/launchers/mortars/ drone bomblets. seems like it would be along your ally
I'm busy playing Farcry 2 again. This is very reminiscent of what happens in game when you let the RPG-7 get all rusty and unreliable. I enjoyed this video a lot, keep 'em coming.
I feel like these rockets might do better with propellant like the bazooka had, ballistite. They dont make that anymore, so whatever a similar equivalent would be. But that would give you a good instant velocity but only for the length of the tube, at which point inertia will carry it home
If all it ever becomes is how not to build a rocket, I'm totally fine with it. For some reason rocket fails make me chuckle because I'm an idiot and don't understand the frustration to understand how they function...but I know they aren't supposed to do that! Lol great video everyone. See ya next time!
Its so cool to see the design process of all of this and its awesome that yall are showing everything, both the good and bad. Great work! Can't wait to see where this project goes in the future :)
First, Ive done this before and see some of your issues. Though when I did it, I was a kid and 3d printers did not exist so I was working with balsa and cardboard for the rockets and PVC for the launch tube. From what I could see in the video as well as the flight of the rockets exiting the tube, I take it that the nose of the rocket was not stabilized in the tube and the rocket was nose heavy. Meaning it could move as it traveled down the tube length. There are two ways I solved it, one was to make a sleeve for the rocket out of foam that was snug in the tube. This was cut so it would break away as the rocket exited the tube. It worked most of the time. The best solution I came up with was to put a set of fins by the nose of the rocket that made it the same diameter as the inside diameter of the tube. This kept it straight and allowed me to hit targets at about 50 yards. Seeing that 3d printing is a thing now, I would make the front fins an airfoil design and test both straight as well as at a small angle to impart a spin to the rocket. With the short launch tube a spin could help stabilize the rocket as it moves down range.
09:25 is my favorite. It made me think of The Right Stuff, where they showed the endless series of launch failures, some more comical than others. And then you immediately followed this up with pretty much the same reference. Keep up the good work, someday you'll get these things to behave.
Question from a hobby rocketeer. Are you using commercial model/high power rocket motors (like those from Aerotech, Cessaroni, Estes, etc.)? While reliable, they do have a tendency to 'sputter,' 'pop,' and have a delayed ignition. CATOs like those you experienced are uncommon, but usually occur if the motor is prepared improperly or has manufacturing defects. Try to find some local rocketry clubs for advice; there are some guys there who have been in the hobby for years and would be more than happy to help you with those stablility issues!
Failure is (or should be) a learning experience. Though often frustrating. Having said that, I enjoyed the misadventurous rockets choosing their own way in life.
This goes to show, leave it to the professionals or you may not love long... Just randomly came across this video and it was very entertaining and educational
What motors were you guys using? You don't usually see the commercial ones Cato, were they homebrew? I've been building my own APCP motors lately, they can be touchy if everything isn't perfect.
Hey there, just throwing it out there incase you guys wanna try an open ended suggestion, Perhaps to try and make sure the rocket leaves the tube in a straight line; Try putting a long knotch down the length of the rocket body that slots into a groove inside the tube, or vice-versa (knotch in the tube, groove on the rocket body), so it can leave without yawing or pitching to one side inside the tube, and that way there is less air gaps inside to make the rocket "bounce" around on the inside. And another suggestion, just like the guide wires of a real TOW, perhaps have a very very low tension reel of fishing line attached to the rockets tail so it has something to drag like a streamer as it flies forward out of the tube. That way it has something to help keep the nose of the rocket from yawing as it flies
I LOVE this series. Hope to see every step from prototypes to a fully functional and legitimate weapon. The development process and testing is fascinating.
Few things that might help from an old engineer, longer launch tube, faster rockets, less guidance complexity (extending fins of that size at the speeds you want would need to be made of incredibly hard steel or titanium or similar to not flex and throw your flight off I'd reccomend either a fast rotation with sturdy componants or slower rotation with much longer slick barrel or much faster speed with the slow rotation), more propellant stability (you might try vibration settled innitially liquid propellant like a stronger rocket candy or something) you want quick but VERY steady burn rates here.
I think my favourite was the one that gently dropped out the back and then rocketed off upwards. 😅 Failure is just the gravel on the path to success🎉 Actually A lot of fun to watch
The real success is them being able to 3D print so many rockets to begin with. Takes me hours just to print out a toy dino for my son and half the time it turns out looking like a chernobyl farms chicken.
Every test is a success, in that you learn something new about it. From my experience of 3D printing they're not the best for precision, so probably all the little inconsistencies are adding up to larger errors. It's always fun watching you blow shit up!
Man you guys are legends! Looks like a lot of fun!! Would be cool to make a drone and a shoulder launched version, probably need a smaller initial charge like the javelin. Keep it up from NZ!
This video took forever to make and edit. The weather was just awful for almost the entire week. The rain turned the range into a giant mud pit. Walking anywhere would cake your shoes into giant mud clogs. The cold did not help either.
Fortunately, Steve and Jake maintained solid motivation to get the rockets made and videos filmed. Steve is hard at work with the mk 3 variant of the rockets now that fresh data on what works and what does not is collected from our testing.
add spin/rotation too the rockets.
Have you though to add a small section of metal tubing into the wire guide on the rockets to keep them on the wire instead of sawing through and flying off in random directions?
The 3d printed liner was my idea. remember?
It's easier to use a recoilless system as a shoulder fired munition. Easier to have calculated ballistics and interchangeable war heads. Rockets favor best when you up the scale past 120mm or larger. So... Rocket favor mounted platforms, Hydra, hailstorm, and tornado rockets... They also do best of soft ignition moving platforms like aircraft, think of the old HVAR rockets
Do to your of the support of the satanic cult in ukraine I am unsubscribing.
Slava Russia 🇷🇺
I know the feeling. I am an 07/02 SOT and anytime I talk or show my machine guns I made I get people telling me they are gonna report me to the feds. Go for it lmao. I pay them every year to have a piece of paper. Great video!
At this point, we dare them to actually follow through. Many claim they will but few actually do it.
@@OrdnanceLab Exactly. I dare them too and low and behold never a report made. I just laugh them off knowing I'm 100% in the legal.
They wouldn't tell you if they were serious about reporting you. It's funny to think people are scared of things like this.
It's really a shame that free men have to ask for permission slips and pay a fee.
I hear it a lot too.
Good to see that the technology is advancing.
And getting put to good and fun use. Lol
RPG is already perfected
@@technophantexcept if you’re grand thumb
@@Delta._V420 Facts
Better late than never! This video took a while as I had a ton of videos to work through. We launched 21 rockets and ran almost 5 cameras, so it ate up a ton of space on my jump drive. Steve and I compiled a great deal of data from these tests to work on an improved rocket design. Soon, the final project will be complete and we can move onto world domination. NBD
Almost 5 cameras? 🤔 I really want to know why the almost was added in there 😂
@Tsunauticus IV had one develop technological issues.
Just glad to watch a video by you guys. Kept up the great work. I appreciate all the great content.
suspend the motor on the front..make like a split yoke design to hold it in the middle on the nose and a wedge under the nozzle with grooves running to the back of the rocket to make the thrust gas bypass the actuall body ...add stabilising X-shape winglets on the back of the rocket atleast as far as the main body lenght...also the grooves that allow the thrust gas to travel from the front of the rocket to the back can be slightly twisted so it adds some spin stabilization...if you make few of rockets where the trailing winglets also have a twist to them..each instance more and more you should be able to dial the twist rate and make it compliment the thrust grooves twist rate, using some high speed footage in like 5 rockets..while i havent seen this design being used anywhere and considering that diverting the gasses around the rocket to the back of it will result in some thrust loss and the pressure it will create in the front of the launcher will also impact exit speed this should work..would work even better if 4 small thrusters are used in an angled diverging thrust nose cone assembly - thats if you can reliably activate them in the same time. if you want more ideas id love to share and help develop them..if you really get down to work you can even print them in vase mode xD
Did someone really call the mounties on you? What's next? The BSAP?
I know it's illegal to try this myself so I appreciate seeing you do this.
This was GREAT!🤣🤣🤣 especially the rocket that ejected out the back of the launch tube ,then ignited and streaked down range 🤣🤣🤣🤣
It identified as a vertical launch system rocket.
Man you can see the frustration in Steve’s face don’t be too down man shits bad ass and obviously will work as intended just need a few things tweaked to get them perfect can’t wait to see the next video with 3d printed ordance and d&s creations
Clearly, the next improvement in tank technology should be hovertanks so the rockets just scoot right under them! :D Appreciate the video kind sirs, will be calling off Europol this time.
The world needs hovertanks.
Um....
Gotta love an ordinance video that hat starts with “uh oh”.
The Z on the tank is a nice touch lol. And no worries about being judged on success, if rocket surgery was easy everyone would do it right?
It is necessary that there be a badge of the Nazi US army, which provoked this war, like many others in the 20th and 21st centuries
@@alcokoalco9278 We could argue about those kinds of lies pushed upon the Russian people by the Putin government until the cows come home. But neither of us will come to any kind of agreement, and arguing about it will do nothing to change the unfortunate international situation we find ourselves in. So why bother?
@@theKashConnoisseur What about the lies of the American government? For example, about the non-expansion of NATO to the east to the borders of the Russian Federation. Fu..ing American double standards
@@alcokoalco9278 Why did you delete your previous comment? Edit: Never mind, TH-cam is being weird.
Arguing about each other's governments lies and crimes is pointless. It does nothing to stop either government from doing the things they do. So why bother? Everyone knows that all governments suck, in general. Treaties are made to be broken.
@@theKashConnoisseur I haven't deleted any of my comments! This is American-style freedom of speech, which is so propagandized on TH-cam
The "undesireable flight path" from the second to last shot on the durable target was actually quite clean - Very little spiraling, looked as if all the fins had deployed properly on the way out, and it had a smooth loft, just so much it went over the intended target. Has D&S tried running these through a software like OpenFOAM to test aerodynamic stability? It could lend some handy clues and reduce the number of physical iterations required to get repeatable results.
The bloopers are way more fun to watch than success
Wile E Coyote vs. enemy tank. 😅 Every failure in testing can save thousands of failures in the field. Great video - blowing up tanks ain't easy!
You guys should talk to that dude building the M202 Flash, his rockets fly like arrows.
They actually already did
Not all of them he's had the same issues we've had. We talk alot and bounce ideas back and fourth
@@DandSCreations Fair enough. That one dude though, with the Panzerfaust, Fliegerfaust, and now an M202 builds some kickass rockets. He's also working on a man portable hypervelocity rocket launcher lol, excited for that one
Hilariously entertaining, reminds me of Wiley Coyote and Roadrunner Cartoons. Keep up the good work and good luck with the next version.🤠💣💥🚀💥
That dog is clearly the highlight of the video and is enjoying the best scratches known to dogkind.
Lol you guys are your worst enemy. Setting up for failure every rocket video lol. Love ya
Great channel, looking forward for future content. Hope this helps a little :)
I'm so glad you guys are able to fulfill the explosive dreams I cant and wont try (I like all ten of my fingers) lol.
Ord Lab: launches rocket
Also Ord Lab 3 sec later: uh oh!
personal advice would be to simplify the rockets. While cool the folding fin designs require alot more precision in opening then traditional fixed fin designs.
Perhaps try a mortar style rocket that way it seats well in the barrel, if youre worried about not producing enough drag for stabilization then use thicker fins or bend the edges. Also try using a aluminum lining for the inside of your launch tube. This will add rigidity, protect from open flame, and absorb heat.
I laughed so hard when the rocket came out of the back of the launcher...then took off !!
I love you guys - also, turns out rocket science is hard, who would have thought?
Harder than trying to learn brain surgery via TH-cam videos.
@@OrdnanceLab I learned hoiw diy surgrery brain sgurgrey from youtube videos nnd im doin just brain
When I saw that wire guide system, I knew immediately that there was no way you were hitting that target 😂 It seems so straight forward, pull the wire taught, attach the rocket and you're good to go, but rockets do not like to be constrained, they are made to fly, and fly they will. Up, down, about, around or apart, but only with exquisite care will they fly true.
The deploying fins working correctly was quite impressive though!
I look forward to further experimentation and testing. Any video with fire in it is a good video, successful projects are just a bonus 😂
Of all the complaints people might make, I wonder how many will be mad you used a Z tank as a target.
So how do you fix the wire chewing through the plastic hanger, use a metal pipe segment as a liner?
rockets, explosives and cute doggos. Instant like! :D
Pleeeeaaaaseeee make more rocket launcher videos!!! I don’t have extra money at the moment to send to support the channel. But this is by far the best channel on TH-cam. I enjoy every second of the launcher episodes you guys make. I really would love to see you guys perfect it. I remember the first rocket episode when you guys shot the panel off the door 🤣😭
Thankfully the dog will give a complete Lab report.
I love the fact you guys are actually making this develpment and investigation on your own, you'll advance really quick youll see
This was actually some serious comedy for me! Some of those rockets literally did what they want and some decided they had their own minds.😂😂😂😂
Pucker factor on the first one is tighter than a black hole singularity. It's like firing an arrow straight up like we did when we were kids, but the arrow can still kill you even if it misses.
I'd personally love to see ordnance lab test a bunch of the 3d defcad files. they have a bunch of "improvised" explosives/launchers/mortars/ drone bomblets. seems like it would be along your ally
I'd love to see them test the 2in mortar that's on there, it's designed to use blank shot shells for propellant
Not from DefCAD, though. Making people pay to access free files and excluding anyone outside the US is pretty uncool in my book.
I'm busy playing Farcry 2 again. This is very reminiscent of what happens in game when you let the RPG-7 get all rusty and unreliable. I enjoyed this video a lot, keep 'em coming.
@ 9:27 That's definitely the best failure, the launchers like "shit on these tests" rocket like "YEEHAW"
That looks like so much fun!
You guys are freaking awesome
I don’t know how this Chanel doesn’t have a million followers yet. 3D printed rockets 😵😵
I feel like these rockets might do better with propellant like the bazooka had, ballistite.
They dont make that anymore, so whatever a similar equivalent would be. But that would give you a good instant velocity but only for the length of the tube, at which point inertia will carry it home
Excellent video again
Trying to comply with yt schematics ❤😅
If all it ever becomes is how not to build a rocket, I'm totally fine with it. For some reason rocket fails make me chuckle because I'm an idiot and don't understand the frustration to understand how they function...but I know they aren't supposed to do that! Lol great video everyone. See ya next time!
Oh damn, I didn't realize I would be getting added to a watchlist. Cool, cool.
Its so cool to see the design process of all of this and its awesome that yall are showing everything, both the good and bad. Great work! Can't wait to see where this project goes in the future :)
"firing in 1 2 3! 💥 Whoops!" 🤣🤣🤣🤣 One of the best unscripted line in your channels history
I'm a long-time subscriber to your channel. I never laughed so hard in my life. You guys need to make a video of all your failed outtakes! Hilarious 🤣
Glad you enjoyed it!
"We're just going to try this rocket for safety" in tall dry grass...
BABE WAKE UP, ORDNANCE LAB POSTED
Please do a video with Wild Arms research! I'd love to see a video on a full power version of his panzer Faust and anti air systems
There's a guy in Washington who made a 3d printed panzerfaust
First, Ive done this before and see some of your issues. Though when I did it, I was a kid and 3d printers did not exist so I was working with balsa and cardboard for the rockets and PVC for the launch tube.
From what I could see in the video as well as the flight of the rockets exiting the tube, I take it that the nose of the rocket was not stabilized in the tube and the rocket was nose heavy. Meaning it could move as it traveled down the tube length. There are two ways I solved it, one was to make a sleeve for the rocket out of foam that was snug in the tube. This was cut so it would break away as the rocket exited the tube. It worked most of the time. The best solution I came up with was to put a set of fins by the nose of the rocket that made it the same diameter as the inside diameter of the tube. This kept it straight and allowed me to hit targets at about 50 yards. Seeing that 3d printing is a thing now, I would make the front fins an airfoil design and test both straight as well as at a small angle to impart a spin to the rocket. With the short launch tube a spin could help stabilize the rocket as it moves down range.
9:27 was the fuckin funniest thing. just the casual bloop out the back before it leaves orbit at four quintillion miles per hour
09:25 is my favorite. It made me think of The Right Stuff, where they showed the endless series of launch failures, some more comical than others. And then you immediately followed this up with pretty much the same reference. Keep up the good work, someday you'll get these things to behave.
Ukrainian soldiers: Write that down write that down!
Rocket goes completely beserk... "Well we just need to aim a bit higher there" Next clip, laucher goes nope, I'm done! I just died lolll
Ooh, the amount of fun you can have with the right paperwork. 😋
Reminds me of the Werner Von Braun quote: "I was aiming for the stars, but sometimes I hit London"
This video is the funniest thing I’ve seen all day
Very impressive watching a few of those Fly Away
That "Uh oh...." almost had my spit out my coffee cause I was laughing so hard.
6:30 “Whoops!” 😅 this is the best channel, ever!
Always a good day with black powder and H.E. and big BOOM's!...by the way Marvin the Martian said keep your rockets out of his lawn... 😂
Nice to have you all back i know you will get success in the end👍
Question from a hobby rocketeer. Are you using commercial model/high power rocket motors (like those from Aerotech, Cessaroni, Estes, etc.)? While reliable, they do have a tendency to 'sputter,' 'pop,' and have a delayed ignition. CATOs like those you experienced are uncommon, but usually occur if the motor is prepared improperly or has manufacturing defects. Try to find some local rocketry clubs for advice; there are some guys there who have been in the hobby for years and would be more than happy to help you with those stablility issues!
Failure is (or should be) a learning experience. Though often frustrating. Having said that, I enjoyed the misadventurous rockets choosing their own way in life.
You know youtube is good when the first thing you see is a 3D printed Missle lmfao
This goes to show, leave it to the professionals or you may not love long...
Just randomly came across this video and it was very entertaining and educational
Yall are doing the lords work, I LOVE THESE VIDEOSSS, keep it up!
Greet content man. I appreciate the advancements and positive mindset through the video
I always wanted an explosives license until I saw pics of accidents so I just watch other people test stuff instead 😂
I feel locking dropping them from a drone would be the safest most effective way to do it lmao.
Could the spring tension from the fins deploying potentially be causing uneven pressure throwing the trajectory off slightly upon exiting the tube?
Always a good day when a see this notification pop up...
Watching the test firing was like watching Wile E. Coyote and Elmer Fudd. 😂😂
yall should use a drone to drop an explosive, and see how effective is it... would be fun to see that
I know failure can hurt. But that was awesome to watch and I appreciate the sacrifice.
Hahahaha one of the handful of phrases that will make you nervous at the range - "Uhh ohh"
It was said a few times. Lol
@@OrdnanceLab At least it kept things exciting. Thanks for bringing us along for the ride.
What motors were you guys using? You don't usually see the commercial ones Cato, were they homebrew? I've been building my own APCP motors lately, they can be touchy if everything isn't perfect.
Hey there, just throwing it out there incase you guys wanna try an open ended suggestion,
Perhaps to try and make sure the rocket leaves the tube in a straight line;
Try putting a long knotch down the length of the rocket body that slots into a groove inside the tube, or vice-versa (knotch in the tube, groove on the rocket body), so it can leave without yawing or pitching to one side inside the tube, and that way there is less air gaps inside to make the rocket "bounce" around on the inside.
And another suggestion, just like the guide wires of a real TOW, perhaps have a very very low tension reel of fishing line attached to the rockets tail so it has something to drag like a streamer as it flies forward out of the tube. That way it has something to help keep the nose of the rocket from yawing as it flies
It might be a weird question, but are you able to make smaller scaled vacuum bombs?
That was great! I really enjoy seeing the work required to prove or disprove a proposed design. Never apologize, always persevere!
Angle the stabilization fins a little bit to create rotation?
Practice practice practice. Love your videos.
Best channel on TH-cam
Ordnance lab is a welcome contributor to the large ice brick based housing industry
I LOVE this series. Hope to see every step from prototypes to a fully functional and legitimate weapon. The development process and testing is fascinating.
Few things that might help from an old engineer, longer launch tube, faster rockets, less guidance complexity (extending fins of that size at the speeds you want would need to be made of incredibly hard steel or titanium or similar to not flex and throw your flight off I'd reccomend either a fast rotation with sturdy componants or slower rotation with much longer slick barrel or much faster speed with the slow rotation), more propellant stability (you might try vibration settled innitially liquid propellant like a stronger rocket candy or something) you want quick but VERY steady burn rates here.
I think my favourite was the one that gently dropped out the back and then rocketed off upwards. 😅
Failure is just the gravel on the path to success🎉
Actually A lot of fun to watch
Experimentation is all part of the fun now you have a better idea of what doesn't work ,So back to the drawing board ,great video love this stuff
so a model rocket with a payload like we've always been able to make, don't freak out about it, Uptights
Maybe making the rocket propelled granade longer will improve flight stability
Super cool to see this, even with the failures you're having its still showing so much promise! cant wait for next iteration of tests
The real success is them being able to 3D print so many rockets to begin with. Takes me hours just to print out a toy dino for my son and half the time it turns out looking like a chernobyl farms chicken.
Damn, those things take off in an instant when the rocket ignites!
The motors have some legit crazy thrust and fast ignition.
Hahahahaha this was one of my favorites guys!! ... keep up the good work 😂
Every test is a success, in that you learn something new about it. From my experience of 3D printing they're not the best for precision, so probably all the little inconsistencies are adding up to larger errors. It's always fun watching you blow shit up!
The precision of 3d printers are down to the quality of the printer and filament.
@@JJayzX Well, you learn something new every day!
Been patiently waiting for this... Exciting
Love these types of 3d printed explosives vids! Keep it up guys!
Man you guys are legends! Looks like a lot of fun!! Would be cool to make a drone and a shoulder launched version, probably need a smaller initial charge like the javelin. Keep it up from NZ!
so, are all of those unfound, UXO's now?
Thanks for sharing! Very interesting. Keep it coming!
Tried angling fins to try spin stablizing?