We know this video is longer than usual, but it's full of interesting information that a lot of people seem to enjoy. Be sure to like and comment away. The 1000th comment gets the steel plate as the gift!
That was awesome and very interesting, i very much enjoyed the longer format- more of those please! Also, are you planning on doing more videos about thermobarics?
This is our first feature video on Shape charged Sunday. Similar to fiery Friday but we release a video on shaped charges on Sunday. Hopefully everyone likes it and finds its interesting!
Something about shape charges had kept me mesmerized since I started learning about them. From how they were discovered till today. So amazing how it works.
I love how it was first discovered by some metal with the company's logo stamped into it getting an explosive set off above it by accident and the divot in the shape of the logo being found later. (I think that's how the story goes)
@@Sevensixtytwo probably before that the office that 1888 was when the office started recording patents look at how many things that were founded in 1888 etc
Back in the day, we learned about shaped charges in ROTC. Well, we had to try one. Went to the feed store and bought some 60% dynamite and a box of caps and some fuse. Got some wine bottles from the our stash. Sure enough, a wine bottle bottom made a pretty good shaped charge.
Back before everything was p***ified. The good ol days. I remember blowing shit up as a teenager and not worrying that much about anyone giving a damn. The most we were worried about was the sheriff saying “you kids knock that shit off” lol
And as shown here, released more energy. Back in 2000, I recall a broken microwave... People were finding pieces of that thing after the cotton was picked and the stalks were mowed... Ya'll Take Care and be safe, John
possibly because it was too energetic. its just supposed to make a flash and a satisfying bang. it isnt supposed to be good for shaped charges and demo work.
@@lukewarmwater6412 I am a former employee of Tannerite, reason it was switched to prill form was because ammonium nitrate mixed with the damp oregon climate caused tons of manufacturing problems. product clumped easily after packaging. on top of that since AN is an oxidizer, the parts in the grinders used would corrode very quickly and then seize up
It was to sensitive and was prone to breaking down over time. I used to buy the little 2”x2” white square with orange bullseye’s back in the 90’s. Those were as powerful as 1lb of tannerite.
Discount Imhotep is probably the most hilarious thing I've heard in recent videos. That one had me laughing way too much. Bravo to whoever thought of that one.
I remember when I was a kid and my uncle and I would go to the hardware store in town and buy a couple sticks of I think 45% or 60% dynamite for blasting rocks in the stream bed. All he needed to show was his driver's license and fill out a form. It was more of a hassle to get blasting caps. Fused caps, just your ID and a piece of paper, electric caps? ID, a couple forms and a call to the sheriff's office.
back in the late 60s my dad and uncles got dynamite to blow up nutria dams on a slew off the red river in Texarkana Arkansas . I was 7 or 8 it was awesome !
Tannerite will act as a shaped charge under certain conditions. I used some as normal and put the rest in the shed for a couple months. The humidity in the shed melted the Tannerite into a semi-solid block. To use it I had to scrape it out with my pocket knife and it came out in a powder form. I added about a pack and a half of the aluminum power, shook it up, and put it back into the original bottle. We put it on a metal saw horse and shot it as usual hoping it could be salvaged. Not only did it detonate but it blew the metal saw horse in half and looked like it had been shot with an artillery round. It was not our intention, but that was the result.
@@lindboknifeandtoolly before mixing. If you mix it then grind you're going to die, or worse wish you had. However, the grain size of the ammonium nitrate is specifically designed to only be sensitive enough. If you grind it you'll get a lot of micro particles that will be far more reactive than the rest of the mix. It won't be so sensitive that you can't move it around or pour it, but don't drop it. There's really no good reason to alter it.
@@boltvanderhuge4858 I don’t know him personally but it was all over the local news. People were talking about it for a long time. Even wilder is within the last couple of years, a few towns over where my uncle lives, a family shot I think 300 lbs worth of tannerite and it was heard the next state over. I believe they got in a lot of trouble. I’ll try and find an article about it. It gets wild down here in Ga.
Technically you can manufacture whatever explosives you want as long as it's from raw materials... however, there some specifics you need to know regarding detection agents for C4 and other plastic explosives... and any unused explosives have storage requirements...
Care to elaborate? I live in the desert, so I'm in a great place to set off explosives without bothering anyone. It'd be nice to know what's what, just so the boog bois don't knock down my door.
Although this is true. In most cases, if you plan on playing with a lot of explosives, best to pay the 1K a year for the license and just buy it. C4 is like 40 bucks for a stick 1.25 lb if i remember correctly. License is easy to get. If your sheriff wont block it. But you will have to install a magazine to spec to store it.
All you need to do with the "tannerite" is mill down the ammonia nitrate to a powder and then mix. When milled down, it makes is .22 sensitive too. Still fun stuff.
@@PilotTed Only when mixed and hit by super fast bullets. The “white part” is ground down in the .22 sensitive version making it more efficient and quite a bit more powerful. I got my binary from another manufacturer and the .22 sensitive was mixed in small baggies instead of a larger tub.
@brokenmedic9133 ah, that's good to know. Never messed with tannerite, though I got to experience mining explosives before while being inside an enclosed quarry. That shock wave hits you like a freight train.
@@PilotTed nope ammonia nitrate on its own you can light it on fire nothing will happen you can hit it with a hammer nothing will happen, tannerite is ammonia nitrate and aluminum powder on the ammonia nitrate will do nothing but with the aluminum powder acts as a catalyst. And not any round that's fired at it will set it off, The round has to be FPS 2000 or above
This is a really fun and fascinating experiment! Not only are you blowing stuff up for fun, but you’re also breaking down what happened. I appreciate that! Especially the high speed camera for those slow-mo shots.
Nice demonstration. There is definitely a place for both high speed and low speed explosives. One of my own examples that showed this to me, many many moons ago, I was building fence in rocky ground. My employer had some fancy two-part explosives. He was real proud of the fact that this fancy stuff had " 'X' times" the power of dynamite. First charge powdered an inch of rock into talcum powder. Second charge did the same. Then I packed it in and tried a third. More of it, but the same powder production. Since I wanted to get the job finished, I requested plain dynamite, which my employer didn't initially understand. He came with me. Showed him with a fourth charge what was happening. Very first charge of dynamite, I had a lot of gravel in my post hole, and very little powder. But that one charge of dynamite broke up enough rock that I could set the post. Depending upon what you want to do, the choice of high velocity or low velocity explosives makes a difference.
Thanks for the demonstration and experiment with this type of explosive. I have always heard the phrase "shaped charge" and just kind of assumed it meant the literal shape you formed the explosive into. But after watching the first explosion and seeing the hole in the plate, I realized there was more to this. So I went and did some research and read all about what a shaped charge is. And holy moly what a ton of information there was to discover. I had no idea all the physics involved in the explosion and what is really going on. Between the shape of the liner, the angle of the void, the metallurgy of the liner, type of explosive used changing the characteristics of the "slug" and all kinds of other details, I just spent about 30mins reading and learning about shaped charges. So I just wanted to say that maybe it could make a good video for you guys to dedicate to specifically talk about the history of shaped charges. From the initial discovery of the science, the later adoption of the technique into military use, the various industrial uses for the technology outside of the military all the way through to the science of the jet, the "carrot" and the "slug" physics depending on the makeup of the device, it could make for a really informative video. I had no idea there was so much cool science going on during the explosion but if anyone could break it down, you guys certainly could.
If shaped charges satisfied your fancy then you might also look into EPFCG. There's not allot of info on the subject (for reasons) but I guarantee you will be impressed nonetheless.
Really glad you guys blurred out some powder pouring into a cup. It would be a real danger if people learned how to mix powder together like it was described on the side of the package or something...
@@alexsmart5452 Aw, how cute. Or perhaps they just don't want to get sued for contributing to the next Oklahoma City? You know, given that folks of ALL political stripes enjoy suing the shit out of anybody they can for some reason. I assure you that stupid doesn't check to see which column on the ballot you check the most, kids. Don't let that stop you from going back to grade school though, I'm sure it won't.
@@AsmodeusMictian LMAO..Got you triggered. You dont even understand my reply to which comment and the context of it. typical lefty; all emotion, no logic.. but Thanks for playing. Grab your door prize on your way out.
@@alexsmart5452 "You dont even understand my reply to which comment and the context of it." You're completely correct, I don't understand 'to which comment and the context of it.", mostly because I don't understand whatever just rolled off your fingertips. Perhaps repost that with something closer to proper grammar and clarity of thought? Also, I find it fascinating that y'all can only seem to see things in "left" and "right". No grey area, no middle ground. Just my team and your team. What I was referring to was the fact that in general, YT'ers will err on the side of extreme caution when dealing with TH-cam's idiotic algorithm and getting de-monetized. Better to do something a bit silly (or in this case, perhaps a bit cheeky :D ) and not get de-monetized than to not do it and take the risk. Given that I didn't insult you or blather on about right/left politics....I'm not surprised you got lost. Hope that helps. Cheers.
For the tannerite, what if you used a stronger blast vessel to get more of a directional blast and then use a copper disk instead of glass, Maybe something ready available like copper flashing ( one of two layers)
Plastic X burns slow and even, whilst gradually building that max pressure. Powdered composites cannot do that......unless he subsitutes for KMnO and lets say Mg mixture. That mixture can be ignited at any point and can be set to go near prefectly centered. Problem would still exist from overpressure, but better results would be achieved.
I have discovered that beer fridges (empty of course) do very well with Tannerite. The safe..Er beer fridge door was effectively removed and recovered. Also tannerite is perfect for getting out of cleaning house as all you do is blow up the vacuum.
I think that, if YT keeps on acting like the HOA of user provided video platforms, they will be replaced in the market. Thank you for sharing. Stay safe.
The original tangerine was not only powdered bit also included a container of PEG 400 to be used to plasticize to the powder for shaped charges to remove stumps.
I cant even imagine what kind of a herculian task must have it been to grind down the ammonium nitrate to a fine powder for that shape charge. Wonderfull content!
I don't get it. It doesn't have to be in flour consistency. If you want to get the powder, much faster way is to heat the AN first in hot pan or whatever, then immediately ground it into fine powder without letting it getting cold. Hotter prills tends to crumble more easily into powder, than moisture absorbed slurry AN. Ball milling and those stuff will not help that much, since it already absorbs water, it will be hard to pulverize it. You have to act quickly, make the mixture as soon as possible, then you can store it in dry place or just readily use it.
Nice work guys! Been to several MG shoots with licensed explosives experts. Very interesting display with legit shaped charges. Uncle Sams Misguided Children also offered some very informative course work as well.
I really have to say the both of you guys never cease to dumbfound me with your volitile creativity and your explosive scientific knowledge all the while being quite entertaining!!!!
Jake, do you think there is a way you guys to put together a simple cartoon or graphic explanation to go along with your different charges? This all seems very interesting to me, but I am sure there are very specific youtube rules for such things.
speaking of, I don't want a "recipe" or anything close for that matter, but what are the basic constutients (or generic chemical families of ingredients) of the Gemini? It always impresses with its performance!
11:00 "void space".... have you guys thought about seeing if there's a powder filler that would cover the void space in a prill binary without screwing with the stochiometry or just flat stealing the aluminum powder coasting? For that matter, I'd be interested to see if something like prill based binary "ammostarch" would function. Cornstarch (baby powder) will pack nearly solid and you could just run it "fuel rich", may even get a little bit of dispersed rapid combustion if the starch that doesn't immediately be consumed stays powdered.
I was pleasantly surprised that such low-brissance charge (AN + Aluminum) dented and warped the thick steel plate, since it shoves more than cracks. I’m also impressed that you guys were able to get the AN fine enough to flow and compact enough to lense. Are you allowed to say how you dried it? Was it mechanical drying (like molecular sieves) or thermal drying (like putting in a low-temperature oven) or did you draw off the water by putting a more hygroscopic medium in the tumbler? If this is too close to instructing a non-licensed person how explosives are made, please let me know and I’ll retract/remove the question.
I built a drying cabinet with a temp control. It allows for me to dry out powders and other substances quickly. Especially large quantities of explosives safely.
Any hot surface between 50-160 Celsius is enough, it is about the time, higher the temperature faster it dries, but you don't want to melt it at 160 C. For example Room heater radiator is enough for drying most chemicals (around 60 celcius) , i just lay the stuff on the hot radiator surface, let them stay a little bit while and then ground them into fine powder
I was looking into tannerite for a Fourth of July finally and a 10 year old kid interrupted us and said that if you grind it in an old coffee grinder before mixing and adding a table spoon of diesel after mixing it make a big fire ball! The shop shrugged and said he was right! Lol
Could you guys do an episode about ANNMAL? As i understand it its just ammonal with nitromethane meant to make it thermobaric. Would be cool to see side by side high speed with other N based explosives.
Piling on to this comment, I've seen references to a mixture called ANNMSA (Ammonium Nitrate/NitroMethane/Sulfuric Acid) on a certain forum. It'd be interesting to see that mix explained.
Discount Imhotep needs some slick sunglasses like budget Jim Carrey. Add in a little flare and you two could be styling like Grand Thumb over here lmao. You guys are great! Dam the algorithm for not giving you the love you deserve!
This is an awesome experiment you guys put together i honestly didn't think it would work at all. Also given the low VOD next time maybe you can try an efp, might work or might not but it'd still be interesting.
Tannerite targets are sold in pre-sized quantities. The package includes two containers. An oxidizer composition is contained within one of the containers and a catalyst composition is contained within the other. The product, developed by Daniel Jeremy Tanner, and initially formulated in 1996,[3] consists of two components: a fuel mixed with a catalyst or sensitizer, and a bulk material or oxidizer. The fuel/catalyst mixture is 90% 600-mesh dark flake aluminium powder, combined with the catalyst that is a mixture of 5% 325-mesh titanium sponge and 5% 200-mesh zirconium hydride[1] (with another patent document[9] listing 5% zirconium hydroxide). The oxidizer is a mixture of 85% 200-mesh ammonium nitrate and 15% ammonium perchlorate.[1] The patents on these formulations were applied for on August 20, 2001.[1][9] United States
Lots of work but good to know for significantly increasing the relative explosive force with what's available. Looks close to the slower push power effect military dynamite gave. Way better than regular tanerite by far. Sadly us peasants still need to improvise our own initiators. Must be nice shopping at PETN Plus or C4 'N More i hope the club card has a crappy membership photo!
Well Done again. Love things that go Bang! Tannerite while fun lacks the brisance of higher explosives to be suitable for shape charges. I did notice an impressive difference in the Ammonal vs Tannerite. Keep it up guys.
I have to say. My Labrador gets *very* serious, almost as serious as a judge handing down a death sentence. Of course that's only when food is involved and he's waiting for his share. Even when it's not for him. Never get tired of things going boom and I appreciate you guys carrying on your mission to share it with us. I just hope Buddy doesn't have unlimited access to the workshop when you're not around. I mean if he sneaks in there while you guys are not there. The world is in trouble. PS: The only reason YT goes after your vids is probably because of the darn Canadian Mounted Police (who, except for ceremonies aren't even "mounted" anymore) flagging them for entertaining snowed in Canadians in the great white north. Thanks for the videos guys. Take it easy, and be safe out there. 😎
@@briancombatengineer12b91 fully aware of that calc and place. Point is, what they have in the video does not in any way appear to be correct. Their lack of response is more proof to my point.
Fascinating. Have you tried using a desiccant to dehydrate the powder while grinding? You could work in a sealed container (sand blasting cabinet-style) with a desiccant present in the tube, or you could possibly seal it in an airtight container with molecular sieve pellets, to minimize and even reverse absorption of atmospheric moisture.
I've lived with the metric system since 1972 and I've never heard centimeters pronounced this way. Even Americans don't pronounce it that way usually and they're masters of mangling the English language. A first for Ordnance Lab.
Really interesting. I don't know much more than the basics about explosives, but have a few thoughts. Is the optimal stand-off distance dependent on the detonation velocity? Is the bend in the thin plate anything to do with the shaping or just because of the explosion in general, i.e. if you set off a charge that size with no shape at that distance what would happen? And could the Tannerite one have managed to penetrate the thin sheet at all?
From what I understand, it has to do with the diameter of the charges "cone" as the lensing effect requires a little distance to build up the penetrators velocity
Copper is a good choice but it isn't the optimal metal. We have experimented with different metal mixtures along with glass and ceramics with great results. Copper is the "best" due to various factors the military favors. Glass does amazingly well as a liner.
@@OrdnanceLabglass definitely does well. Your results speak for themselves. Just wasn't sure if one performed better that the other. Love the channel. Keep up the good work and the terrible jokes!!!
@@samthenerf Absolutely. It forms a great jet. We are now experimenting with borosilicate glass to make custom shape charges. We need a new glass blower though as the guy we were working with is out of the game.
What formula did you use to determine stand-off distances for the three charges? Standoff for the Tannerite looked almost double the other two charges. This can have more of a detrimental effect on lens shape/speed/brisance than even the weaker R.E. of the Tannerite. Were the parameters changed to intentionally make the Tannerite fail in order to prevent folks from trying stupid stuff, so they don't suffer "Death by lawnmower" or "Death by washing machine"? Just curious as this may have a detrimental effect on the credibility of the channel.
The issue is not only the air voids that create an internal "turbulence" that disrupts the formation of the requisite jetstream, but the lack of sufficient velocity produced by the tannerite and other "low" / displacing explosives. Two basic classes of explosives; Heaving (low velocity) used to displace material ie "cratering" and shattering (high velocity) to shatter or cut in place, such as in controlled building demolitions. (Where you don't want material flying all over town) 😉 A shaped charge simply requires High velocity explosives that can be formed around a precise, conical shape. Low velocity just won't cut it. The charge that penetrated the heavy plate demonstrated the jetstream "cutting" effect of a working shaped charge; It produced a Hot enough jetstream with enough energy sufficient to burn or "cut" through the plate. While the lower powered charge penetrated the thinnner plate, it did so only by applying enough energy sufficient to structurally deform, rupture and tear the thinner material, not Cut it. It lacks the power to deform Thicker material to failure and doesn't burn hot enough fast enough to cut... A proper shaped charge creates a jetstream of maybe 2000 Kelvin... something over 3000 degrees Fahrenheit. Sufficient to burn through the thick front slope of a main battle tank. Recieved my demolition training at Demolition school, Seventh Army Training Center, Vilseck Germany a long lonnnnnng time ago... so the precision of my memory could be off a degree or two!
The only inconsistency I see in your comparison is the leg length was much longer on the Tannerite charge. Just questioning why and how much of a difference it made. Cool vid guys!!!
@@madrenwillims4391 Sounds good! I was curious - not that I know a lot about shape charges, other than usually copper is used for the forcing cone. Thanks.
@@madrenwillims4391 Maybe lead would be a better option. It is softer so low detonation velocity of tannerite would form the jet easier. Also melting the ammonium nitrate and then adding the AL powder would create a more homogenous mixture with less void space so the shockwave travels uniformly. Explosively formed penetrators would be a great idea to test also.
Great video, as always. I understand how crazy and dangerous it might sound, but is it actually possible to melt ammonal, for maximum density and consistency? It may require lowering pressure to lower melting temperature and avoid ignition. Just curious how far you can push ammonal's efficiency.
I think that the ammonium nitrate act a little bit like a base and starts reacting with the aluminum if you heat it... making aluminum nitrate and setting the ammonium free, but I'm not sure, I'm just guessing. I mixed magnesium with ammonium nitrate one time, and accidentally got it wet and it started smelling like ammonia,
The lenght of the legs is decisive,he mentions it when saying,it" lenses" the explosive force! Rule of the thumb:Distance approx 2,5x diameter of cone!
@@chuckfinley3152 Can't answer that.But somewhere there is the borderline between a shaped charge and an explosive formed projectile.You don't want to be on the receiving end of either of these!
12:29 Count how many times he removes his left hand from the steel plate and puts it back on it again. If your answer was: "OCD is a curse," congratulations, you are correct.
Pretty sure that it doesn't require huge amounts of dynamite to damage tracks enough to derail a train. Finnish Kaukopartio (Long-distance patrol, special forces predecessor) used TNT charges deep behind Soviet lines to Murmansk railroad. Charges were German design, meant to sabotage railroads. Those had delay or pressure triggers. Quick google didn't provide much online information about these charges. I just remembered reading of them as commonly carried inventory recently.
I remember back in my Demo school days ('84), we had an instructor who taught us this exact skill. I was Cav, not a Combat Engineer. Anyway, he literally made the track sing, on purpose, as it flew threw the air. One of my better days of existance.
Probably been asked before, but how would your ammonial charge react to having a round fired at it compared to the over the counter Tannerite? You stated that it's mixed to achieve a higher impact sensitivity, that got me curious. Thanks for awesome content as always!
Amonal is an exothermic compound. It's a highly unstable mixture that self detonate if stored for any length of time. It needs to be mixed and used immediately.
In the early 80s, we had a few cases of dynamite on the farm. MyGreat Uncle bought them before anyone cared. I grew up disposing of trees, rocks, and stolen cars that were dumped on the farm. Still have all my parts. And, an awesome childhood to remember.
Back in the 70s I acquired two books. They were about the size of a TV guide. They were called black book number one and black book number 2 of improvised munitions. Basically they're on how to manual an improvised munitions, igniters and detonators. They even show how to make a zip gun out of pipe. I think I'm going to donate them to our local police department's EOD team.
@Ordonance Lab may I request you try it with the most common mining explosives like ANFO, the emulsion paste in the "dynamite" sticks used for blasting wet shots and Donarite Also maybe Apex - since it's a common while dangerous improvised explosive and scarily easy to produce with peroxide, acetone and a catalyst acid. And maybe Pistol NC Powder-I don't know if a detonator works with NC Powder like a high explosive without a pressure container NC Powder does have a point where it switches from explosive deflagration to real detonation, I just don't know if you can reach it without pressure vessel/sustain it for the time needed for a completed reaction... Surprise me please Its absolutely awesome you make this knowledge public, I'm saving up to make a explosives license here in Europe
Be sure if you put it in a lawn mower you have a few tourniquets and a medivac standing by. A couple of guys did it and one lost his leg at the scene and got pretty messed up.
We never set off the charges with us in the line of fragmentation. I'm crazy but def don't have a death wish. For that test, we will use a dummy. We have a ton of rescue randy dummies for that.
I love that you described losing respect for explosives leading to people turning into pink mist. That's exactly how I explain to people what a military aged male (MAM) on a motorbike looks like when they get hit by a hellfire missile. SAMESEES!
I think the problem is, to think gun powder. Gun powder is very crappy, unless you compress it in a tight soace like a barrel. I think the tannerite would have worked in that same way. A long barrel with the same set up as a bullet. Longer the barrel more force at the end of the charge. Just my thoughts. Option 2, is to set up several small charges to make it act like high explosives. Micro charges arrayed all around the tannerite to set it all off at a high explosive speed. You can use the triggers used for model rocket motors with a seriers of extremely small charges. All of them blowing at once should make the tannerite act like a high explosive. Love the channel and let me know how it works out.
My grandfather kept dynamite on the farm many years ago. The store that sold it was just across the road from the high school. He kept the dynamite in the old corn crib which was used to store junk. My grandma kept her canning jars there as well. They both were very afraid of snakes. My grandma went to get some jars and discovered a large snake wrapped around the log wall which just happened to be next to the old dynamite box. The dynamite was very old at this time. I was only about four years old then. My grandfather shot at the snake with his shotgun and blew up the whole corn crib! He killed the snake but broke all my grandma's canning jars! I was very impressed with the power of that old shotgun and those big green shells!
In a hollow charge tank shell's shaped charge creates a superheated jet of gas from the copper lining that will burn through thick steel almost instantly and that jet ignites anything inside the tank and ruins the lungs of the occupants. The jet is focused by the shape of the shell. With the wine bottle it is the bottle neck that focuses the jet. Without any focusing device the shaped charge has to be hard up against the target, even a very small gap will dissipate the jet. Tannerite actually burns a lot hotter than most explosives, that is why it's used for cutting steel, exactly as the evidence found all over the world trade centre cite and why no complete investigation was done. In the tank shell it is the compression made by the shaped charge that creates a temperature far hotter than the sun for a few thousandths of a second. Edited for spelling errors
Hey there,I thought that you would appreciate knowing that a bead reamer will remove the stems from the martini glasses. It will require Abit of elbow grease & lubricated with H2O but will give you a clean detachment with absolutely no fractures or deformations from best. A bead reamer is a small diamond file found at hobby or bead stores. There cheap but very versatile. You very possibly may even use a dremal with a masonarey cutting bit but have someone spraying it with a small soft jet of water to lube and help it keep it's cool. Either will work. Happy New Year! Like your productions.
tannerite is more pushing power less tearing or ripping force. we used 40 lb cratering charges that are shape charge design and also made with amonium nitrate.
I've noticed that many of the near miss Tannerite videos involve targets with doors. I have seen more guys nearly deleted by car, microwave oven, refrigerator, oven and barn doors while shooting to close. This is why fireworks have instruction to light and move away!
I cut down a pretty big tree with tannerite once. Plunge cut a 4”x4”x12” hole in the trunk, rolled 1.5lbs tightly in a ziplock bag, put it at the back of the hole and packed snow tightly to fill the hole. The separated tree blew up off the stump about 6” and came down. The trunk was about 15” where we made the cut.
I was contemplating picking some binary charges for the 22lr shooting we do to keep ammo costs down, while adding a bit of excitement for the shooters, no one would know which target had the charge! While asking the owner about safety and it’s general mixing and charge size, a ten year old kid walked up and said to use an old coffee grinder to powder the tannerite, “you get a bigger bang”, I looked up at the owner , and he said the kid was right, except to make sure the aluminum was kept way till time to mix. Lol
We know this video is longer than usual, but it's full of interesting information that a lot of people seem to enjoy. Be sure to like and comment away. The 1000th comment gets the steel plate as the gift!
Awesome start to an otherwise lack luster Sunday
Can you do another test like this with Nitromethane/Ammonia?
Yous guys rocks!
@@claycopopo NM/AN in a shape charge you mean? Sure. We can do that.
That was awesome and very interesting, i very much enjoyed the longer format- more of those please!
Also, are you planning on doing more videos about thermobarics?
I like your longer videos!
The ultra low effort tannerite censoring was absolutely hilarious. Lol
"THINK OF THE CHILDREN!"
@@OrdnanceLab You mean the ones who run TH-cam?
@@OrdnanceLab would it possible to make a mini rocket and add a shape charge in front of it? Like the real missiles... Just for fun
@@AfafPrinceOSH you must be in Florida.
@@Davidrcobb nope😂 just a curious guy from Bangladesh
You should def test out the lawnmower explosion with a ballistics dummy. You know...........for science and stuff.
Like how that video is so widespread we just know
Not like the „I blew my leg off“ guy.... 😂
We need to find a lawnmower first. Most people seem to be rather attached to theirs and don't want it nuked.
don't need to theres a video on youtube we clearly know a piece of metal took his leg off when the idiot tried it
@@jlambuth the local small engine repair shop has a whole junkyard of them in the back
This is our first feature video on Shape charged Sunday. Similar to fiery Friday but we release a video on shaped charges on Sunday. Hopefully everyone likes it and finds its interesting!
discord link reminder
@@johnsmith-sp6yl Oh good point. Thanks for reminding me!
@AJ Schriever Oh.......yes........good idea.
Haha! Yesss!!
Shape Charge Sundays!
Love it!!
This is such a rad concept. Yeehaw America
Something about shape charges had kept me mesmerized since I started learning about them. From how they were discovered till today. So amazing how it works.
100% they are interesting in pretty much every way
I love how it was first discovered by some metal with the company's logo stamped into it getting an explosive set off above it by accident and the divot in the shape of the logo being found later. (I think that's how the story goes)
Charles E. Munroe was first to describe how shaped charge effect works. In 1888. Hence the name "Munroe effect".
@@Sevensixtytwo probably before that the office that 1888 was when the office started recording patents look at how many things that were founded in 1888 etc
Blast or fire has to go one direction in the ignition process thus creates a way to and from!
Back in the day, we learned about shaped charges in ROTC. Well, we had to try one. Went to the feed store and bought some 60% dynamite and a box of caps and some fuse. Got some wine bottles from the our stash. Sure enough, a wine bottle bottom made a pretty good shaped charge.
I wish I could buy tnt and blasting caps at the feed store
Back before everything was p***ified. The good ol days. I remember blowing shit up as a teenager and not worrying that much about anyone giving a damn. The most we were worried about was the sheriff saying “you kids knock that shit off” lol
As a young powder monkey I got to do a lot with explosives....
I have moved as many as 800 cases at a time back in the day
@@111Moose AHHH THE GOOD OL DAYS! LOL!
ROTC 😅
The original Tannerite was a fine powder ammonium nitrate it was changed to prill after a while on the market.
And as shown here, released more energy. Back in 2000, I recall a broken microwave...
People were finding pieces of that thing after the cotton was picked and the stalks were mowed...
Ya'll Take Care and be safe, John
possibly because it was too energetic. its just supposed to make a flash and a satisfying bang. it isnt supposed to be good for shaped charges and demo work.
@@lukewarmwater6412 I am a former employee of Tannerite, reason it was switched to prill form was because ammonium nitrate mixed with the damp oregon climate caused tons of manufacturing problems. product clumped easily after packaging. on top of that since AN is an oxidizer, the parts in the grinders used would corrode very quickly and then seize up
@@SouthCoastTargets oh, so I picked the more obvious, less accurate answer. fair enough.
It was to sensitive and was prone to breaking down over time. I used to buy the little 2”x2” white square with orange bullseye’s back in the 90’s. Those were as powerful as 1lb of tannerite.
Discount Imhotep is probably the most hilarious thing I've heard in recent videos. That one had me laughing way too much. Bravo to whoever thought of that one.
I rather like the title. I chuckle every time I hear it.
Imhotep
Imhotep
Imhotep
Imhotep
IKR I love it as the resemblance is a little uncanny for such a title
How come you never see Discount Imhotep & Arnold Vosloo in the room at the same time?
@@doughesson You know too much!
I remember when I was a kid and my uncle and I would go to the hardware store in town and buy a couple sticks of I think 45% or 60% dynamite for blasting rocks in the stream bed. All he needed to show was his driver's license and fill out a form. It was more of a hassle to get blasting caps. Fused caps, just your ID and a piece of paper, electric caps? ID, a couple forms and a call to the sheriff's office.
Those were the days...
Truely freedom is thing of the past. 😢
back in the late 60s my dad and uncles got dynamite to blow up nutria dams on a slew off the red river in Texarkana Arkansas .
I was 7 or 8 it was awesome !
That's freedom?
@@jordan-H0wdyH0 yes .
Tannerite will act as a shaped charge under certain conditions. I used some as normal and put the rest in the shed for a couple months. The humidity in the shed melted the Tannerite into a semi-solid block. To use it I had to scrape it out with my pocket knife and it came out in a powder form. I added about a pack and a half of the aluminum power, shook it up, and put it back into the original bottle. We put it on a metal saw horse and shot it as usual hoping it could be salvaged. Not only did it detonate but it blew the metal saw horse in half and looked like it had been shot with an artillery round. It was not our intention, but that was the result.
Would you be able to grind it with a food processor or mortar and pestle?
@@lindboknifeandtoolI think you meant chocolate 🍫 bars and Nestlé.
@@lindboknifeandtoolly before mixing. If you mix it then grind you're going to die, or worse wish you had.
However, the grain size of the ammonium nitrate is specifically designed to only be sensitive enough. If you grind it you'll get a lot of micro particles that will be far more reactive than the rest of the mix. It won't be so sensitive that you can't move it around or pour it, but don't drop it. There's really no good reason to alter it.
Thank you for proving twin tower theory!
As an old combat engineer. This brought back some old memories and classed. Thank you
You miss blowing things up right😅
12 Bravo !!!
1371 usmc Engr s up. 1971
the tannerite standoff was way to big in my opinion about 4 inches too much
The guy who shot the lawn mower and lost his leg happened the next town over from me. He’s lucky to have survived.
No way. Have you seen him lately? I saw that video and wondered how bad he got messed up.
That's why you don't put the explosives behind the frame... you put it in front of the frame so the shrapnel goes away from you...
@@boltvanderhuge4858 I don’t know him personally but it was all over the local news. People were talking about it for a long time. Even wilder is within the last couple of years, a few towns over where my uncle lives, a family shot I think 300 lbs worth of tannerite and it was heard the next state over. I believe they got in a lot of trouble. I’ll try and find an article about it. It gets wild down here in Ga.
@@justmeiswear that is legit wild. Especially if heard the next state over.
I used to work with Brian the guy that set off the drum of tannerite in MN. Much more boom and no lost limbs
Technically you can manufacture whatever explosives you want as long as it's from raw materials... however, there some specifics you need to know regarding detection agents for C4 and other plastic explosives... and any unused explosives have storage requirements...
Care to elaborate?
I live in the desert, so I'm in a great place to set off explosives without bothering anyone.
It'd be nice to know what's what, just so the boog bois don't knock down my door.
Although this is true. In most cases, if you plan on playing with a lot of explosives, best to pay the 1K a year for the license and just buy it. C4 is like 40 bucks for a stick 1.25 lb if i remember correctly. License is easy to get. If your sheriff wont block it. But you will have to install a magazine to spec to store it.
@@robsdeviceunknown agreed. The license is cheaper than legal costs/fees
I thought you had to have a business or something to get such a license.
@@RavenWolffe77 it's illegal to store or transport it, that is why tannerite is legal you mix it and use it right away
All you need to do with the "tannerite" is mill down the ammonia nitrate to a powder and then mix. When milled down, it makes is .22 sensitive too. Still fun stuff.
I've heard they have rimfire now
sounds like a good way to get yourself blow up ngl, isn't this shit pretty sensitive to fiction and heat?
@@PilotTed Only when mixed and hit by super fast bullets. The “white part” is ground down in the .22 sensitive version making it more efficient and quite a bit more powerful. I got my binary from another manufacturer and the .22 sensitive was mixed in small baggies instead of a larger tub.
@brokenmedic9133 ah, that's good to know. Never messed with tannerite, though I got to experience mining explosives before while being inside an enclosed quarry. That shock wave hits you like a freight train.
@@PilotTed nope ammonia nitrate on its own you can light it on fire nothing will happen you can hit it with a hammer nothing will happen, tannerite is ammonia nitrate and aluminum powder on the ammonia nitrate will do nothing but with the aluminum powder acts as a catalyst. And not any round that's fired at it will set it off, The round has to be FPS 2000 or above
This is a really fun and fascinating experiment! Not only are you blowing stuff up for fun, but you’re also breaking down what happened. I appreciate that! Especially the high speed camera for those slow-mo shots.
Nice demonstration. There is definitely a place for both high speed and low speed explosives.
One of my own examples that showed this to me, many many moons ago, I was building fence in rocky ground. My employer had some fancy two-part explosives. He was real proud of the fact that this fancy stuff had " 'X' times" the power of dynamite. First charge powdered an inch of rock into talcum powder. Second charge did the same. Then I packed it in and tried a third. More of it, but the same powder production.
Since I wanted to get the job finished, I requested plain dynamite, which my employer didn't initially understand. He came with me. Showed him with a fourth charge what was happening. Very first charge of dynamite, I had a lot of gravel in my post hole, and very little powder. But that one charge of dynamite broke up enough rock that I could set the post. Depending upon what you want to do, the choice of high velocity or low velocity explosives makes a difference.
Thanks for the demonstration and experiment with this type of explosive. I have always heard the phrase "shaped charge" and just kind of assumed it meant the literal shape you formed the explosive into. But after watching the first explosion and seeing the hole in the plate, I realized there was more to this. So I went and did some research and read all about what a shaped charge is. And holy moly what a ton of information there was to discover. I had no idea all the physics involved in the explosion and what is really going on. Between the shape of the liner, the angle of the void, the metallurgy of the liner, type of explosive used changing the characteristics of the "slug" and all kinds of other details, I just spent about 30mins reading and learning about shaped charges. So I just wanted to say that maybe it could make a good video for you guys to dedicate to specifically talk about the history of shaped charges. From the initial discovery of the science, the later adoption of the technique into military use, the various industrial uses for the technology outside of the military all the way through to the science of the jet, the "carrot" and the "slug" physics depending on the makeup of the device, it could make for a really informative video. I had no idea there was so much cool science going on during the explosion but if anyone could break it down, you guys certainly could.
If shaped charges satisfied your fancy then you might also look into EPFCG. There's not allot of info on the subject (for reasons) but I guarantee you will be impressed nonetheless.
@@astrataway7077 oh you beat me to it. Efp's are fucking neat
Really glad you guys blurred out some powder pouring into a cup. It would be a real danger if people learned how to mix powder together like it was described on the side of the package or something...
Can't blame them for TH-cam's liberal stupidity.
@@dadsquatch79 "liberal stupidity" is redundant.
@@alexsmart5452 Aw, how cute.
Or perhaps they just don't want to get sued for contributing to the next Oklahoma City? You know, given that folks of ALL political stripes enjoy suing the shit out of anybody they can for some reason.
I assure you that stupid doesn't check to see which column on the ballot you check the most, kids. Don't let that stop you from going back to grade school though, I'm sure it won't.
@@AsmodeusMictian LMAO..Got you triggered. You dont even understand my reply to which comment and the context of it. typical lefty; all emotion, no logic.. but Thanks for playing. Grab your door prize on your way out.
@@alexsmart5452 "You dont even understand my reply to which comment and the context of it."
You're completely correct, I don't understand 'to which comment and the context of it.", mostly because I don't understand whatever just rolled off your fingertips. Perhaps repost that with something closer to proper grammar and clarity of thought?
Also, I find it fascinating that y'all can only seem to see things in "left" and "right". No grey area, no middle ground. Just my team and your team.
What I was referring to was the fact that in general, YT'ers will err on the side of extreme caution when dealing with TH-cam's idiotic algorithm and getting de-monetized. Better to do something a bit silly (or in this case, perhaps a bit cheeky :D ) and not get de-monetized than to not do it and take the risk.
Given that I didn't insult you or blather on about right/left politics....I'm not surprised you got lost. Hope that helps.
Cheers.
Unique pronunciation of "centimeter".
Sin-ti-mitters
What’s a centimeter HOOORAHHHH🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🦅🦅🦅🦅🗿
Take that Europe
I was wondering if he was saying it like that to be funny or if he says meters in a unique way also
For the tannerite, what if you used a stronger blast vessel to get more of a directional blast and then use a copper disk instead of glass, Maybe something ready available like copper flashing ( one of two layers)
Use a hydraulic press and dies to form copper cones of copper pipe caps?
Plastic X burns slow and even, whilst gradually building that max pressure. Powdered composites cannot do that......unless he subsitutes for KMnO and lets say Mg mixture. That mixture can be ignited at any point and can be set to go near prefectly centered. Problem would still exist from overpressure, but better results would be achieved.
metals tend towards a plasma slug ive heard?
You should use a ball mill, then compress everything tight
Nice, good explaining on them fireworks parts. Amazing energy in a small package. Thanks for the time spent making the video.
Would a grenade sump actually do it’s job?
You know, that's a great idea. Adding it to the list of to do videos.
@@OrdnanceLab sweet!
@Ordnance Lab
please do this
What's a grenade sump?
@@aleks138 it's a hole in the bottom of a fighting position to kick a grenade into if it is thrown in with you.
I have discovered that beer fridges (empty of course) do very well with Tannerite. The safe..Er beer fridge door was effectively removed and recovered. Also tannerite is perfect for getting out of cleaning house as all you do is blow up the vacuum.
I think that, if YT keeps on acting like the HOA of user provided video platforms, they will be replaced in the market.
Thank you for sharing. Stay safe.
The original tangerine was not only powdered bit also included a container of PEG 400 to be used to plasticize to the powder for shaped charges to remove stumps.
Smells like Shitrus
I cant even imagine what kind of a herculian task must have it been to grind down the ammonium nitrate to a fine powder for that shape charge.
Wonderfull content!
Hi!
It was 3 days of dedicated ball milling and drying. I spent most of the day dealing with that and it was a pain.
A tumbler with ball bearings?
I don't get it. It doesn't have to be in flour consistency. If you want to get the powder, much faster way is to heat the AN first in hot pan or whatever, then immediately ground it into fine powder without letting it getting cold. Hotter prills tends to crumble more easily into powder, than moisture absorbed slurry AN. Ball milling and those stuff will not help that much, since it already absorbs water, it will be hard to pulverize it. You have to act quickly, make the mixture as soon as possible, then you can store it in dry place or just readily use it.
Really easy. Use a blender or Ninja. Add silica packs to absorb moisture. Not don't grind the silica packs. ;D
Nice work guys! Been to several MG shoots with licensed explosives experts. Very interesting display with legit shaped charges. Uncle Sams Misguided Children also offered some very informative course work as well.
Also if the RCMP weren't so busy I'd definitely be reporting you guys
Yep, their plate is full with the current maple syrup crisis
LOL
We keep several kilos of premium maple syrup and high proof beer on hand to bribe them if necessary.
I really have to say the both of you guys never cease to dumbfound me with your volitile creativity and your explosive scientific knowledge all the while being quite entertaining!!!!
I've been going back watching these older vids bc I really like things that go boom. So needless to say I'm enjoying this channel.
I was legit surprised the ammonal charges worked. I was skeptical at first. Way too much work to make them functional though.
Jake, do you think there is a way you guys to put together a simple cartoon or graphic explanation to go along with your different charges? This all seems very interesting to me, but I am sure there are very specific youtube rules for such things.
speaking of, I don't want a "recipe" or anything close for that matter, but what are the basic constutients (or generic chemical families of ingredients) of the Gemini? It always impresses with its performance!
@@mattfleming86 I can't go into details, but it is NM based.
@@MrAPCProductions I could add more graphics sure.
Is 2 pounds of tannerite more powerful than 2 pounds of flash powder? Does what it's contained in make a difference?
11:00 "void space".... have you guys thought about seeing if there's a powder filler that would cover the void space in a prill binary without screwing with the stochiometry or just flat stealing the aluminum powder coasting?
For that matter, I'd be interested to see if something like prill based binary "ammostarch" would function. Cornstarch (baby powder) will pack nearly solid and you could just run it "fuel rich", may even get a little bit of dispersed rapid combustion if the starch that doesn't immediately be consumed stays powdered.
Exactly what I was thinking. Hope they respond.
@@sixoaksfarm1556 I just like that it went boom.
Powdered sugar
I was pleasantly surprised that such low-brissance charge (AN + Aluminum) dented and warped the thick steel plate, since it shoves more than cracks. I’m also impressed that you guys were able to get the AN fine enough to flow and compact enough to lense. Are you allowed to say how you dried it? Was it mechanical drying (like molecular sieves) or thermal drying (like putting in a low-temperature oven) or did you draw off the water by putting a more hygroscopic medium in the tumbler? If this is too close to instructing a non-licensed person how explosives are made, please let me know and I’ll retract/remove the question.
Thermal drying is usually good for AN since it's stable at higher temps
I built a drying cabinet with a temp control. It allows for me to dry out powders and other substances quickly. Especially large quantities of explosives safely.
Any hot surface between 50-160 Celsius is enough, it is about the time, higher the temperature faster it dries, but you don't want to melt it at 160 C. For example Room heater radiator is enough for drying most chemicals (around 60 celcius) , i just lay the stuff on the hot radiator surface, let them stay a little bit while and then ground them into fine powder
Information is free.
I would just put it in a decicator bag
Great data. I was waiting to comment about the velocity discussion, glad I did!
I was looking into tannerite for a Fourth of July finally and a 10 year old kid interrupted us and said that if you grind it in an old coffee grinder before mixing and adding a table spoon of diesel after mixing it make a big fire ball! The shop shrugged and said he was right! Lol
Awesome video, great to see the algorithm getting your name out.
Us too!
Could you guys do an episode about ANNMAL? As i understand it its just ammonal with nitromethane meant to make it thermobaric. Would be cool to see side by side high speed with other N based explosives.
We can do that. Sure!
@@jlambuth awesome!
Piling on to this comment, I've seen references to a mixture called ANNMSA (Ammonium Nitrate/NitroMethane/Sulfuric Acid) on a certain forum. It'd be interesting to see that mix explained.
@@jlambuth fantastic! I was gonna ask about a mix with 3 percent by weight nitromethane.
@@Tunkkis Interesting. I'll look into it.
You guys should test all the IED’s in the combat engineer hand book. It’s a unclassified Army TM so you can get one for the looking.
Discount Imhotep needs some slick sunglasses like budget Jim Carrey. Add in a little flare and you two could be styling like Grand Thumb over here lmao. You guys are great! Dam the algorithm for not giving you the love you deserve!
Don’t think the outcome would be different, but it looks like the stand off legs on the Tannerite was farther away from the plate then others
Subbed a while back. Any channel with a 'Shaped charge Saturday' feature validates that decision.
This is an awesome experiment you guys put together i honestly didn't think it would work at all. Also given the low VOD next time maybe you can try an efp, might work or might not but it'd still be interesting.
So what happens if you fill the voids in the tannerite with another explosive 🤔
Tannerite targets are sold in pre-sized quantities. The package includes two containers. An oxidizer composition is contained within one of the containers and a catalyst composition is contained within the other.
The product, developed by Daniel Jeremy Tanner, and initially formulated in 1996,[3] consists of two components: a fuel mixed with a catalyst or sensitizer, and a bulk material or oxidizer. The fuel/catalyst mixture is 90% 600-mesh dark flake aluminium powder, combined with the catalyst that is a mixture of 5% 325-mesh titanium sponge and 5% 200-mesh zirconium hydride[1] (with another patent document[9] listing 5% zirconium hydroxide). The oxidizer is a mixture of 85% 200-mesh ammonium nitrate and 15% ammonium perchlorate.[1] The patents on these formulations were applied for on August 20, 2001.[1][9]
United States
Thx for the testing guys! Very interesting!
Lots of work but good to know for significantly increasing the relative explosive force with what's available. Looks close to the slower push power effect military dynamite gave. Way better than regular tanerite by far. Sadly us peasants still need to improvise our own initiators. Must be nice shopping at PETN Plus or C4 'N More i hope the club card has a crappy membership photo!
Well Done again. Love things that go Bang! Tannerite while fun lacks the brisance of higher explosives to be suitable for shape charges. I did notice an impressive difference in the Ammonal vs Tannerite. Keep it up guys.
just making the 1k guy get there. cool beans, and stay safe guys.
Love watching explosions, also I'm a proud WVian and loved that you rocked the goodies. Great content, glad the algorithm brought me to your c
SWEET! Can you guys please do a "Tannerite water impulse door breaching charge" video?
I have to say. My Labrador gets *very* serious, almost as serious as a judge handing down a death sentence. Of course that's only when food is involved and he's waiting for his share. Even when it's not for him. Never get tired of things going boom and I appreciate you guys carrying on your mission to share it with us. I just hope Buddy doesn't have unlimited access to the workshop when you're not around. I mean if he sneaks in there while you guys are not there. The world is in trouble.
PS: The only reason YT goes after your vids is probably because of the darn Canadian Mounted Police (who, except for ceremonies aren't even "mounted" anymore) flagging them for entertaining snowed in Canadians in the great white north.
Thanks for the videos guys. Take it easy, and be safe out there. 😎
Homemade reactive armour would be really cool to see 👍
Reactive armor for body armor lol
@@Daniel-wy2kx now THAT would be cool to see lol.
I don't rate their chances of doing less harm than good but it'd be really interesting lol
How did you calculate the standoff for the tannerite device? Certainly appeared to be too tall.
this was my thought as well, dont think we'll get an answer.
Normally its calculated 1.5 times the cone diameter. With the cone of a angle in between 40 and 60 degrees.
@@briancombatengineer12b91 fully aware of that calc and place. Point is, what they have in the video does not in any way appear to be correct.
Their lack of response is more proof to my point.
@@jonathandickson5698 Sssh, don't ruin it for everyone! Remember, this _totally_ doesn't work, so there's no need to ban it!
Fascinating. Have you tried using a desiccant to dehydrate the powder while grinding? You could work in a sealed container (sand blasting cabinet-style) with a desiccant present in the tube, or you could possibly seal it in an airtight container with molecular sieve pellets, to minimize and even reverse absorption of atmospheric moisture.
I've lived with the metric system since 1972 and I've never heard centimeters pronounced this way. Even Americans don't pronounce it that way usually and they're masters of mangling the English language. A first for Ordnance Lab.
Really interesting. I don't know much more than the basics about explosives, but have a few thoughts.
Is the optimal stand-off distance dependent on the detonation velocity? Is the bend in the thin plate anything to do with the shaping or just because of the explosion in general, i.e. if you set off a charge that size with no shape at that distance what would happen? And could the Tannerite one have managed to penetrate the thin sheet at all?
From what I understand, it has to do with the diameter of the charges "cone" as the lensing effect requires a little distance to build up the penetrators velocity
Wouldn't a copper cone work better than a glass cone?
Just curious because in the military they taught us that the copper cone was the optimal choice.
Copper is a good choice but it isn't the optimal metal. We have experimented with different metal mixtures along with glass and ceramics with great results. Copper is the "best" due to various factors the military favors. Glass does amazingly well as a liner.
@@OrdnanceLab Can glass form an aerodynamically stable jet?
@@OrdnanceLabglass definitely does well. Your results speak for themselves. Just wasn't sure if one performed better that the other. Love the channel. Keep up the good work and the terrible jokes!!!
@@samthenerf Absolutely. It forms a great jet. We are now experimenting with borosilicate glass to make custom shape charges. We need a new glass blower though as the guy we were working with is out of the game.
@@MrDoss89 it's a good thing I didn't minor in comedy. Def would have failed that degree.
What formula did you use to determine stand-off distances for the three charges? Standoff for the Tannerite looked almost double the other two charges. This can have more of a detrimental effect on lens shape/speed/brisance than even the weaker R.E. of the Tannerite.
Were the parameters changed to intentionally make the Tannerite fail in order to prevent folks from trying stupid stuff, so they don't suffer "Death by lawnmower" or "Death by washing machine"? Just curious as this may have a detrimental effect on the credibility of the channel.
The issue is not only the air voids that create an internal "turbulence" that disrupts the formation of the requisite jetstream, but the lack of sufficient velocity produced by the tannerite and other "low" / displacing explosives.
Two basic classes of explosives; Heaving (low velocity) used to displace material ie "cratering" and shattering (high velocity) to shatter or cut in place, such as in controlled building demolitions. (Where you don't want material flying all over town) 😉
A shaped charge simply requires High velocity explosives that can be formed around a precise, conical shape. Low velocity just won't cut it.
The charge that penetrated the heavy plate demonstrated the jetstream "cutting" effect of a working shaped charge; It produced a Hot enough jetstream with enough energy sufficient to burn or "cut" through the plate. While the lower powered charge penetrated the thinnner plate, it did so only by applying enough energy sufficient to structurally deform, rupture and tear the thinner material, not Cut it. It lacks the power to deform Thicker material to failure and doesn't burn hot enough fast enough to cut...
A proper shaped charge creates a jetstream of maybe 2000 Kelvin... something over 3000 degrees Fahrenheit. Sufficient to burn through the thick front slope of a main battle tank.
Recieved my demolition training at Demolition school, Seventh Army Training Center, Vilseck Germany a long lonnnnnng time ago... so the precision of my memory could be off a degree or two!
The only inconsistency I see in your comparison is the leg length was much longer on the Tannerite charge. Just questioning why and how much of a difference it made. Cool vid guys!!!
Would love to see this again with a copper cone instead of glass.
Yeah or maybe zinc
@@madrenwillims4391 Interesting, why Zinc?
@@navyhmc8302 mostly because I have a lot of pure zinc and because it shares a few qualities with copper
@@madrenwillims4391 Sounds good! I was curious - not that I know a lot about shape charges, other than usually copper is used for the forcing cone. Thanks.
@@madrenwillims4391 Maybe lead would be a better option. It is softer so low detonation velocity of tannerite would form the jet easier. Also melting the ammonium nitrate and then adding the AL powder would create a more homogenous mixture with less void space so the shockwave travels uniformly. Explosively formed penetrators would be a great idea to test also.
Great video, as always.
I understand how crazy and dangerous it might sound, but is it actually possible to melt ammonal, for maximum density and consistency? It may require lowering pressure to lower melting temperature and avoid ignition. Just curious how far you can push ammonal's efficiency.
I think that the ammonium nitrate act a little bit like a base and starts reacting with the aluminum if you heat it... making aluminum nitrate and setting the ammonium free, but I'm not sure, I'm just guessing. I mixed magnesium with ammonium nitrate one time, and accidentally got it wet and it started smelling like ammonia,
Can the legs of the shaped charge be lengthened or shortened to maximize the effect of the shaped charge or does it even matter?
Direct contact is ideal the less space between charge and target the better
I think there is a formula for it
We adjust the stand off distance based on a formula I work with.
The lenght of the legs is decisive,he mentions it when saying,it" lenses" the explosive force! Rule of the thumb:Distance approx 2,5x diameter of cone!
@@chuckfinley3152 Can't answer that.But somewhere there is the borderline between a shaped charge and an explosive formed projectile.You don't want to be on the receiving end of either of these!
Shape charge depends on the exlosion wave speed - so the cone angle would be different for different materials.
12:29 Count how many times he removes his left hand from the steel plate and puts it back on it again. If your answer was: "OCD is a curse," congratulations, you are correct.
I wonder if a cone of copper would work better than glass from a wine bottle.
At that point add a backing plate and make an EFP, the Mizany-Shardin effect punches well above its weight.
I believe it would be more consistent, though likely not penetrate deeper.
Can you guys test the blowing up rail tracks from western movies? I would love to know it that really worked?
That's a good suggestion :D
Pretty sure that it doesn't require huge amounts of dynamite to damage tracks enough to derail a train. Finnish Kaukopartio (Long-distance patrol, special forces predecessor) used TNT charges deep behind Soviet lines to Murmansk railroad. Charges were German design, meant to sabotage railroads. Those had delay or pressure triggers. Quick google didn't provide much online information about these charges. I just remembered reading of them as commonly carried inventory recently.
I remember back in my Demo school days ('84), we had an instructor who taught us this exact skill. I was Cav, not a Combat Engineer. Anyway, he literally made the track sing, on purpose, as it flew threw the air. One of my better days of existance.
Probably been asked before, but how would your ammonial charge react to having a round fired at it compared to the over the counter Tannerite? You stated that it's mixed to achieve a higher impact sensitivity, that got me curious.
Thanks for awesome content as always!
Amonal is an exothermic compound. It's a highly unstable mixture that self detonate if stored for any length of time. It needs to be mixed and used immediately.
Saw that WV hoodie and immediately liked. Blue and gold forever!
In the early 80s, we had a few cases of dynamite on the farm.
MyGreat Uncle bought them before anyone cared.
I grew up disposing of trees, rocks, and stolen cars that were dumped on the farm.
Still have all my parts.
And, an awesome childhood to remember.
Now this is the kind of science we need!
Cool video!! Are you guys able to show a big shaped charge like in a hellfire or something similar?
Oh yes we can
@@OrdnanceLab really that’s cool!! Thanks for answering.
@@OrdnanceLab One of my favorite Obama quotes.
Did the bad guy from the mummy give up world domination to teach science class?
LOL. OK that was funny.
Back in the 70s I acquired two books. They were about the size of a TV guide. They were called black book number one and black book number 2 of improvised munitions. Basically they're on how to manual an improvised munitions, igniters and detonators. They even show how to make a zip gun out of pipe. I think I'm going to donate them to our local police department's EOD team.
You guys are officially my new favorite TH-cam channel! Keep the informative shows coming and thank you for your time and effort!
This channel never disappoints
@Ordonance Lab may I request you try it with the most common mining explosives like ANFO, the emulsion paste in the "dynamite" sticks used for blasting wet shots and Donarite
Also maybe Apex - since it's a common while dangerous improvised explosive and scarily easy to produce with peroxide, acetone and a catalyst acid.
And maybe Pistol NC Powder-I don't know if a detonator works with NC Powder like a high explosive without a pressure container
NC Powder does have a point where it switches from explosive deflagration to real detonation, I just don't know if you can reach it without pressure vessel/sustain it for the time needed for a completed reaction... Surprise me please
Its absolutely awesome you make this knowledge public, I'm saving up to make a explosives license here in Europe
They already have a video on acetone peroxide.
Be sure if you put it in a lawn mower you have a few tourniquets and a medivac standing by.
A couple of guys did it and one lost his leg at the scene and got pretty messed up.
That video was wild. Dude was an idiot standing so close lmao. And they acted surprised when his leg came off..
We never set off the charges with us in the line of fragmentation. I'm crazy but def don't have a death wish. For that test, we will use a dummy. We have a ton of rescue randy dummies for that.
Thank you for sharing comparisons. Love your videos. 😀
I love that you described losing respect for explosives leading to people turning into pink mist. That's exactly how I explain to people what a military aged male (MAM) on a motorbike looks like when they get hit by a hellfire missile. SAMESEES!
Thank you for using metric system in your videos 😄
Metric system > imperial system
~ Jake
@@OrdnanceLab Amen brother
I grew up on the metric system and I'll die with it as well.
@@jlambuth I moved to the US in 2011 and I'm now a heavy duty mechanic so I've had to learn imperial 🙄
Jim Carrey and Vin Diesel from Chernobyl...
LOL
dang, it's a shame you had to censor the mixing of the tannerite. it's so hard to figure out, and I thought I'd be able to learn how from this video
That low Budget Imhotep line just got you an instant follow. Your my kind of people
I think the problem is, to think gun powder. Gun powder is very crappy, unless you compress it in a tight soace like a barrel. I think the tannerite would have worked in that same way. A long barrel with the same set up as a bullet. Longer the barrel more force at the end of the charge. Just my thoughts. Option 2, is to set up several small charges to make it act like high explosives. Micro charges arrayed all around the tannerite to set it all off at a high explosive speed. You can use the triggers used for model rocket motors with a seriers of extremely small charges. All of them blowing at once should make the tannerite act like a high explosive. Love the channel and let me know how it works out.
My grandfather kept dynamite on the farm many years ago. The store that sold it was just across the road from the high school. He kept the dynamite in the old corn crib which was used to store junk. My grandma kept her canning jars there as well. They both were very afraid of snakes. My grandma went to get some jars and discovered a large snake wrapped around the log wall which just happened to be next to the old dynamite box. The dynamite was very old at this time. I was only about four years old then. My grandfather shot at the snake with his shotgun and blew up the whole corn crib! He killed the snake but broke all my grandma's canning jars! I was very impressed with the power of that old shotgun and those big green shells!
This is amazing!
@TheMonkey747 -ly stupid.
Fixed it for you.
Cen-timiters 🤣 good one.
Definitely saying it that way from now on
It's how my dad pronounced it and I'm stuck with it. Everyone gets a rise out of it..........so.......sticking with the pronunciation.
@@jlambuth as long as you don't use decimeters us metric folks will be fine
Hell yeah explosionssss
Plz collaborate with the slo mo guys!
In a hollow charge tank shell's shaped charge creates a superheated jet of gas from the copper lining that will burn through thick steel almost instantly and that jet ignites anything inside the tank and ruins the lungs of the occupants. The jet is focused by the shape of the shell. With the wine bottle it is the bottle neck that focuses the jet. Without any focusing device the shaped charge has to be hard up against the target, even a very small gap will dissipate the jet.
Tannerite actually burns a lot hotter than most explosives, that is why it's used for cutting steel, exactly as the evidence found all over the world trade centre cite and why no complete investigation was done.
In the tank shell it is the compression made by the shaped charge that creates a temperature far hotter than the sun for a few thousandths of a second.
Edited for spelling errors
Hey there,I thought that you would appreciate knowing that a bead reamer will remove the stems from the martini glasses. It will require Abit of elbow grease & lubricated with H2O but will give you a clean detachment with absolutely no fractures or deformations from best. A bead reamer is a small diamond file found at hobby or bead stores. There cheap but very versatile. You very possibly may even use a dremal with a masonarey cutting bit but have someone spraying it with a small soft jet of water to lube and help it keep it's cool. Either will work. Happy New Year! Like your productions.
This guy says centimeters like someone that read it in a book as a kid, and never heard anyone say it out loud. Great video regardless 👍
I love that “ Imhotep” was representing WV Rest Virginia with that hoodie!!!
tannerite is more pushing power less tearing or ripping force. we used 40 lb cratering charges that are shape charge design and also made with amonium nitrate.
Love the Dub V attire. Just wanted to say hey from WV, and love the videos guys. Keep up the good work.
Great information. We have a beaver dam to deal with before it ruins our stock pond.
I've noticed that many of the near miss Tannerite videos involve targets with doors. I have seen more guys nearly deleted by car, microwave oven, refrigerator, oven and barn doors while shooting to close. This is why fireworks have instruction to light and move away!
I cut down a pretty big tree with tannerite once. Plunge cut a 4”x4”x12” hole in the trunk, rolled 1.5lbs tightly in a ziplock bag, put it at the back of the hole and packed snow tightly to fill the hole.
The separated tree blew up off the stump about 6” and came down. The trunk was about 15” where we made the cut.
I was contemplating picking some binary charges for the 22lr shooting we do to keep ammo costs down, while adding a bit of excitement for the shooters, no one would know which target had the charge! While asking the owner about safety and it’s general mixing and charge size, a ten year old kid walked up and said to use an old coffee grinder to powder the tannerite, “you get a bigger bang”, I looked up at the owner , and he said the kid was right, except to make sure the aluminum was kept way till time to mix. Lol
I don't know much about shaped charges but would useing a metal tube rather then a PVC tube cause more penetration?