Paper 3 Practical Skills (IAL Paper 6)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ก.ย. 2024
  • In preparation for Paper 3 for home A-level or Paper 3 or 6 for IAL...
    If you liked this video, support the creator by buying me a coffee at: www.buymeacoff...
    For other support options, check out:
    Patreon: / nutshellphysics
    Website: www.stemtutors...

ความคิดเห็น • 18

  • @ammxarr
    @ammxarr ปีที่แล้ว +3

    just in time! love to see it, we appreciate your work alot, thanks for everything.

    • @nutshellphy
      @nutshellphy  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You’re most welcome! The very best of luck to you.

  • @MidnightStorm4990
    @MidnightStorm4990 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yes just in time! Physics paper 3 on Thursday

  • @michaelkorres5255
    @michaelkorres5255 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sooo helpful! Thank you for the video

  • @Regina_ODwyer
    @Regina_ODwyer 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great Video!

  • @aliartosian6808
    @aliartosian6808 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Can we get a face reveal pls 😩

  • @mollyrobinson6615
    @mollyrobinson6615 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank u so much for this video!! If they give you the uncertainty of the instrument in the exam like +/- 0.1mm, do you use that to calculate the percentage uncertainty as the numerator, or do you use half that value? Thanks in advance.

    • @nutshellphy
      @nutshellphy  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you are sure that’s the uncertainty (which would be weird since that would imply a resolution of 2mm), use that. But if that’s the resolution of the instrument, based on what instrument they say is being used (in this case a metre rule) then use half that. They expect you to know the resolution of the 4 instruments I listed.

    • @mollyrobinson6615
      @mollyrobinson6615 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nutshellphy thanks so much. I was just confused, because in the 2017 Edexcel a level paper, question 6, they give 0.27mm +/- 0.01mm for the diameter and 1.25m +/- 0.05m for the length, and in calculating the percentage uncertainties I halved 0.01, and 0.05, whereas they didn't, because that's the uncertainty, not the resolution?

    • @nutshellphy
      @nutshellphy  ปีที่แล้ว

      Ah! That’s because 2017 is still using the old ways… now it’s definitely half resolution.

    • @mollyrobinson6615
      @mollyrobinson6615 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nutshellphy ahhhhh, okay!! Thanks!! I have been confused for days 🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @RA-wl4by
    @RA-wl4by ปีที่แล้ว

    when do i divide the least count by 2? and when do i use the given value when trying to calculate uncertainty

    • @nutshellphy
      @nutshellphy  ปีที่แล้ว

      There are various ways of determining uncertainty. Edexcel have plumped for this one. You can also do ‘furthest from the mean’ if you want.
      I’m not sure what you mean by ‘given value’ though.

  • @abdulmuizz4039
    @abdulmuizz4039 ปีที่แล้ว

    why do some people take full resolution as uncertainty but some take half i’m always confused about that. do we always take half or are their some special cases where we must take full resolution

    • @abdulmuizz4039
      @abdulmuizz4039 ปีที่แล้ว

      for example in oct 21 4bi to find %U they take half the resolution and in june 2018 1ai they take full resolution to find %U, both are similar questions of explaining why micrometer screw gauge is an appropriate instrument

    • @nutshellphy
      @nutshellphy  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Often it depends on whether it’s the new spec or the old. 2018 might still be old spec (if you’re taking about IAL). The new spec says half. The exception is if you’re not measuring from zero, like across multiple wavelengths along a metre rule where you have to take 2 readings from the rule. Then it’s half at each end.
      I suspect your example is a situation where full res was still accepted until people adapted. Now it has to be half.

    • @abdulmuizz4039
      @abdulmuizz4039 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nutshellphy yes IAL, thank you so much you've seriously helped me out a lot in these past few months with your videos

    • @nutshellphy
      @nutshellphy  ปีที่แล้ว

      You’re most welcome! Glad they’ve been helpful.