I have a friend who has a government clearance. Some years back he said something about Trump online or reposted something derogatary. About a week or two later the secret service came knocking on his front door qnd asked him a bunch of questions. He was eventually cleared of any wrong dping but learned his lesson to not talk about tue president in public.
I would love nothing more than for them to protect our actual rights than bow to an emperor. If they can't handle my speech about that I don't care. They aren't fulfilling the oath of service to the Constitution. You watch the protesters be attacked by riot police there goes the right to protest and maybe if the secret service protected the protesters vs him? Maybe the chief of staff should have realized as he marched with him uh I just failed my oath TO THE CONSTITUTION. If they can't handle that I speak with the angst and the hatred of their failures wait til they get a real load of me when I assemble a military to show them what it's like to fail and be punished for their failures vs rewarded with pensions. I HOLD ALL ACCOUNTABLE NOT SOME TO THEIR OATH OF SERVICE.
This is a very touchy subject? Excuse me, in order to defend FREEDOM OF SPEECH ONE MUST USE THAT FREEDOM NOT BE FORCED TO STAY SILENT. The reason why you shouldn't go in Public in your DRESS uniform is because it's an intimidation tactic. The POLICE OFFICERS shouldn't march in uniform on what laws they will enforce or won't or will put to the side. That is unless they are adamantly opposed to the enforcement of such laws and then they reserve the RIGHT TO PROTEST ALL LAWS not some laws. It's their little check on the balance of power to be an executive not a legislative person. You didn't remove your right when you joined the service to defend those rights. Certain people would love for you to have done so and worse have changed your mind that you don't even have these rights. Listen to me very carefully, you didn't lose your rights to freedom of speech or of protest by joining our military. Anyone who would tell you otherwise is an enemy of those rights that you have sworn to uphold. Now there is truth that when you're donning your uniform in a pubic place that creates fear that the military is for or against law and policy of law. It also creates the illusion that the military will use force to defend vs protest or worse not even obey law. If we can look back at the civil rights movement as an example. The National Guard was called in to protect a citizen's right to go to school. Imagine if those soldiers were like nah bro we protest Ruby Bridges from attending this school wearing the National Guard uniforms vs enforcing the policy of being able to go to school. Imagine the press showing that the National Guard refuses to protect a person's ability to go to school and how the governors and local people who wanted segregation to continue and integration policies to be dismantled. What is important is when you see those police officers literally use force to discourage protesters from civil rights and not see our military defend those rights through force upon those who use force to intimidate those who don't have rights. Maybe that was a calculated call because people in the south really hate the idea of a federal force telling them what to do vs looking at their own militaristic forces not obeying federal laws including the right to speech and protest. I wasn't alive then but looking at how the National Guard and the police acted and how we got to integration without a civil war is honestly one of the biggest caveats to understanding why militaries shouldn't assemble in uniform to protest laws? Or use social media to do so as well. That doesn't mean soldiers sailors airmen guards have lost their right to speech and protest. I believe it's critically important to hear from everyone no matter their rank because the moment that our own military believes that they don't have a voice is the moment they begin questioning if anyone does. Having watched our military remove and punish using discriminatory tactics without protest was and is disgusting and if you're confused there are 2 things I watched our military do as a child. The first was the ability to remove a cartoon from 7pm 7:30pm to late at night. Some politicians didn't like the fact that the cartoon used language they didn't appreciate... This of course came with you can't listen to that music that comedian that news broadcast. Our military did nothing while they didn't change the amendment to freedom of speech vs speech they say is appropriate and inappropriate. The next was watching our military without protest obey a law that I find absolutely Unconstitutional. The ability to remove a volunteer from our service for being gay and or restricting a gay person's speech. It was at that moment when that law was signed into law without a Constitutional amendment I found that law as a teenager in violation of EEO as well as our Constitution OUR MILITARY DID NOTHING. NOT ONE JAG OFFICER NOT ONE PROSECUTOR STATE OR FEDERAL BROUGHT CHARGES AGAINST THE FORMER COMMANDER IN CHIEF AS WELL AS NOT ONE JUDGE? The ability to openly discriminate federally against gay people to discourage their public religion their public speech was stripped away with no one caring. Our military swore an oath to defend those freedoms and instead enabled without protest without trial by jury without actually holding illegality responsible to a trial began to discriminate and open hostility against gay people began immediately. Now it is every military members responsibility no matter of rank or pay to ensure that citizens have rights? If you don't have access to those rights how can they? If you have somehow surrendered YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS to obeying a superior? Then you sir are undeserving of defending them. In order to defend those rights you must be able to use them. While I absolutely agree with the UCMJ not permitting you to do so while in uniform I also understand why. I understand why in a public discourse off base it's not good. Let's apply this to right now though. You have used social media. ANyone can watch this clip and anyone can respond including foreign intel who would love nothing more than to enrage you? Turn you against eachother? Turn your base into a facility of hostility. I believe there is a reason why the UNIVERSAL LAW OF MILITARY JUSTICE restricts the use of a uniform in a public manner on policies and procedures. That doesn't mean I believe that the military has lost the ability to protest nor restrict their voices and opinions. However, I do believe that it is absolutely irresponsible for a military member to engage with the public in uniform because the public doesn't necessarily view things the way a military member will. When we see militias recruit ex military they have agendas. Foreign nations have agendas. Foreign nations have militias with their own agendas. They plan they coordinate and they will use you if they can get a hold of you. Not giving them a way in enables you to talk amongst yourselves but you're right plenty of people are sooo afraid of using their voice because the first thing bootcamp does is remove your voice. It's do as that says immediately it's not just jump mofo it's jump til say stop not how high you can jump and beat that jump and then beat that jump with an accolade of well done. Bootcamp doesn't like protest and there is a reason for that because it can get people hurt killed. Unfortunately, rank thinks that it understands everything vs it is oblivious to all understanding below it. I don't believe you have lost your voice but it is important to understand that if you don't use your voice you mos def have.
As I listened to you not say no to the President of the United States of America... Your oath has nothing to do with bowing to an emperor sir. Your Oath Is to the Constitution of the United States of America. Your oath is also to the UCMJ. You look at former President Bill Clinton and the congress who passed Unconstitutional policies and you didn't speak up you didn't hold them accountable? Former President WIlliam Jefferson Clinton not only didn't uphold the Constitution of our Nation and invited policies that absolutely violated service members Constitutional rights the man openly Violated the UCMJ which was in effect for all service members. Let's take a look at the punishment he should've immediately received but wasn't given by any military member. The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 134, which covers extramarital sexual conduct, can result in severe punishment for a military member: Dishonorable discharge, Forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and Confinement for up to one year. He is a dishonorable man and insulted his wife publicly sir. You are to send him to the brig but you didn't because you have somehow enabled your brain that he is above THE UNIVERSAL LAW OF MILITARY JUSTICE. It's not Universal if not equally applied. Now let me make this very clear to you. You have the right to change the UCMJ laws. You have the right to protest these laws YOU DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO SOMEHOW GIVE UNTO A MAN WHO IS SUPPOSED TO HOLD THAT LAW ABOVE HIM AND YOU AND BE LIKE HE CAN GET AWAY WITH IT. As for our Former President Donald John Trump. When the capitol was under attack and he sat in a room and did nothing... He was informed that violence was happening that the Vice President's life was potentially in danger by a mob of people... Do you know what Dereliction of duty is? Here's the punishment In the U.S. Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), dereliction of duty is a failure to perform one's assigned duties, either intentionally or negligently, without a valid excuse. It is addressed in Article 92 of the UCMJ, which governs failure to obey orders or regulations. A service member can be convicted of dereliction of duty if they: Had a duty to perform Knew or should have known of their duty Willfully, negligently, or culpably inefficiently failed to perform their duty Punishment for dereliction of duty depends on the circumstances, but can include: Willful dereliction: A bad conduct discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement for up to six months, and a reduction in rank to E-1 Willful dereliction resulting in death or grievous bodily harm: A dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement for up to two years, and a reduction in rank to E-1 Other punishments: Restriction, fines, and punitive letters of reprimand. The military hasn't punished this man publicly and the reason is your mindset that somehow we have an emperor. No sir we don't have an emperor we have a Constitution that all people are equal. Do you know what that means to me that once again all those people with rank and power have no idea what they're doing but if you're an enlisted vs an officer and you do anything like that sir I promise you you will feel the effects of that law being placed upon you. Laws aren't equal until equally applied. You will hold our Commander in Chief to the same laws and obedience that the commander in chief expects of you to obey. if you refuse to do so you have defied a direct order not from an officer sir but from the Constitution.
I understand and I agree, I personally believe that when you are representing a company or organization that should be separate from your own personal beliefs unless you represent or a representation of said place.
@@RobthaBlak my boss or place of work doesn't silence me. It doesn't say I have lost my right to speech protest or religion because I went to work. In fact, that's one of our problems that companies feel empowered to tell their employees they don't have the rights while using USA currency and not one military member or police officer will respond to that even if it is on camera on video. Not one person will smack sense into that witch thinks it has the power through monetary funding to remove your right to speak. It can't be free if I have to bend my knee to some douchebag
I have a friend who has a government clearance. Some years back he said something about Trump online or reposted something derogatary. About a week or two later the secret service came knocking on his front door qnd asked him a bunch of questions. He was eventually cleared of any wrong dping but learned his lesson to not talk about tue president in public.
I would love nothing more than for them to protect our actual rights than bow to an emperor. If they can't handle my speech about that I don't care. They aren't fulfilling the oath of service to the Constitution. You watch the protesters be attacked by riot police there goes the right to protest and maybe if the secret service protected the protesters vs him? Maybe the chief of staff should have realized as he marched with him uh I just failed my oath TO THE CONSTITUTION. If they can't handle that I speak with the angst and the hatred of their failures wait til they get a real load of me when I assemble a military to show them what it's like to fail and be punished for their failures vs rewarded with pensions. I HOLD ALL ACCOUNTABLE NOT SOME TO THEIR OATH OF SERVICE.
WoWWWWwww!!!!!
Amen
This is a very touchy subject? Excuse me, in order to defend FREEDOM OF SPEECH ONE MUST USE THAT FREEDOM NOT BE FORCED TO STAY SILENT. The reason why you shouldn't go in Public in your DRESS uniform is because it's an intimidation tactic. The POLICE OFFICERS shouldn't march in uniform on what laws they will enforce or won't or will put to the side. That is unless they are adamantly opposed to the enforcement of such laws and then they reserve the RIGHT TO PROTEST ALL LAWS not some laws. It's their little check on the balance of power to be an executive not a legislative person. You didn't remove your right when you joined the service to defend those rights. Certain people would love for you to have done so and worse have changed your mind that you don't even have these rights. Listen to me very carefully, you didn't lose your rights to freedom of speech or of protest by joining our military. Anyone who would tell you otherwise is an enemy of those rights that you have sworn to uphold. Now there is truth that when you're donning your uniform in a pubic place that creates fear that the military is for or against law and policy of law. It also creates the illusion that the military will use force to defend vs protest or worse not even obey law. If we can look back at the civil rights movement as an example. The National Guard was called in to protect a citizen's right to go to school. Imagine if those soldiers were like nah bro we protest Ruby Bridges from attending this school wearing the National Guard uniforms vs enforcing the policy of being able to go to school. Imagine the press showing that the National Guard refuses to protect a person's ability to go to school and how the governors and local people who wanted segregation to continue and integration policies to be dismantled. What is important is when you see those police officers literally use force to discourage protesters from civil rights and not see our military defend those rights through force upon those who use force to intimidate those who don't have rights. Maybe that was a calculated call because people in the south really hate the idea of a federal force telling them what to do vs looking at their own militaristic forces not obeying federal laws including the right to speech and protest. I wasn't alive then but looking at how the National Guard and the police acted and how we got to integration without a civil war is honestly one of the biggest caveats to understanding why militaries shouldn't assemble in uniform to protest laws? Or use social media to do so as well. That doesn't mean soldiers sailors airmen guards have lost their right to speech and protest. I believe it's critically important to hear from everyone no matter their rank because the moment that our own military believes that they don't have a voice is the moment they begin questioning if anyone does. Having watched our military remove and punish using discriminatory tactics without protest was and is disgusting and if you're confused there are 2 things I watched our military do as a child. The first was the ability to remove a cartoon from 7pm 7:30pm to late at night. Some politicians didn't like the fact that the cartoon used language they didn't appreciate... This of course came with you can't listen to that music that comedian that news broadcast. Our military did nothing while they didn't change the amendment to freedom of speech vs speech they say is appropriate and inappropriate. The next was watching our military without protest obey a law that I find absolutely Unconstitutional. The ability to remove a volunteer from our service for being gay and or restricting a gay person's speech. It was at that moment when that law was signed into law without a Constitutional amendment I found that law as a teenager in violation of EEO as well as our Constitution OUR MILITARY DID NOTHING. NOT ONE JAG OFFICER NOT ONE PROSECUTOR STATE OR FEDERAL BROUGHT CHARGES AGAINST THE FORMER COMMANDER IN CHIEF AS WELL AS NOT ONE JUDGE? The ability to openly discriminate federally against gay people to discourage their public religion their public speech was stripped away with no one caring. Our military swore an oath to defend those freedoms and instead enabled without protest without trial by jury without actually holding illegality responsible to a trial began to discriminate and open hostility against gay people began immediately. Now it is every military members responsibility no matter of rank or pay to ensure that citizens have rights? If you don't have access to those rights how can they? If you have somehow surrendered YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS to obeying a superior? Then you sir are undeserving of defending them. In order to defend those rights you must be able to use them. While I absolutely agree with the UCMJ not permitting you to do so while in uniform I also understand why. I understand why in a public discourse off base it's not good. Let's apply this to right now though. You have used social media. ANyone can watch this clip and anyone can respond including foreign intel who would love nothing more than to enrage you? Turn you against eachother? Turn your base into a facility of hostility. I believe there is a reason why the UNIVERSAL LAW OF MILITARY JUSTICE restricts the use of a uniform in a public manner on policies and procedures. That doesn't mean I believe that the military has lost the ability to protest nor restrict their voices and opinions. However, I do believe that it is absolutely irresponsible for a military member to engage with the public in uniform because the public doesn't necessarily view things the way a military member will. When we see militias recruit ex military they have agendas. Foreign nations have agendas. Foreign nations have militias with their own agendas. They plan they coordinate and they will use you if they can get a hold of you. Not giving them a way in enables you to talk amongst yourselves but you're right plenty of people are sooo afraid of using their voice because the first thing bootcamp does is remove your voice. It's do as that says immediately it's not just jump mofo it's jump til say stop not how high you can jump and beat that jump and then beat that jump with an accolade of well done. Bootcamp doesn't like protest and there is a reason for that because it can get people hurt killed. Unfortunately, rank thinks that it understands everything vs it is oblivious to all understanding below it. I don't believe you have lost your voice but it is important to understand that if you don't use your voice you mos def have.
As I listened to you not say no to the President of the United States of America... Your oath has nothing to do with bowing to an emperor sir. Your Oath Is to the Constitution of the United States of America. Your oath is also to the UCMJ. You look at former President Bill Clinton and the congress who passed Unconstitutional policies and you didn't speak up you didn't hold them accountable? Former President WIlliam Jefferson Clinton not only didn't uphold the Constitution of our Nation and invited policies that absolutely violated service members Constitutional rights the man openly Violated the UCMJ which was in effect for all service members. Let's take a look at the punishment he should've immediately received but wasn't given by any military member. The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 134, which covers extramarital sexual conduct, can result in severe punishment for a military member: Dishonorable discharge, Forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and Confinement for up to one year. He is a dishonorable man and insulted his wife publicly sir. You are to send him to the brig but you didn't because you have somehow enabled your brain that he is above THE UNIVERSAL LAW OF MILITARY JUSTICE. It's not Universal if not equally applied. Now let me make this very clear to you. You have the right to change the UCMJ laws. You have the right to protest these laws YOU DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO SOMEHOW GIVE UNTO A MAN WHO IS SUPPOSED TO HOLD THAT LAW ABOVE HIM AND YOU AND BE LIKE HE CAN GET AWAY WITH IT. As for our Former President Donald John Trump. When the capitol was under attack and he sat in a room and did nothing... He was informed that violence was happening that the Vice President's life was potentially in danger by a mob of people... Do you know what Dereliction of duty is? Here's the punishment In the U.S. Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), dereliction of duty is a failure to perform one's assigned duties, either intentionally or negligently, without a valid excuse. It is addressed in Article 92 of the UCMJ, which governs failure to obey orders or regulations.
A service member can be convicted of dereliction of duty if they:
Had a duty to perform
Knew or should have known of their duty
Willfully, negligently, or culpably inefficiently failed to perform their duty
Punishment for dereliction of duty depends on the circumstances, but can include:
Willful dereliction: A bad conduct discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement for up to six months, and a reduction in rank to E-1
Willful dereliction resulting in death or grievous bodily harm: A dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement for up to two years, and a reduction in rank to E-1
Other punishments: Restriction, fines, and punitive letters of reprimand.
The military hasn't punished this man publicly and the reason is your mindset that somehow we have an emperor. No sir we don't have an emperor we have a Constitution that all people are equal. Do you know what that means to me that once again all those people with rank and power have no idea what they're doing but if you're an enlisted vs an officer and you do anything like that sir I promise you you will feel the effects of that law being placed upon you. Laws aren't equal until equally applied. You will hold our Commander in Chief to the same laws and obedience that the commander in chief expects of you to obey. if you refuse to do so you have defied a direct order not from an officer sir but from the Constitution.
No fool, enlisted aren't entitled to the full freedoms of the constitution.
Top tier comment 🫡
I understand and I agree, I personally believe that when you are representing a company or organization that should be separate from your own personal beliefs unless you represent or a representation of said place.
@@RobthaBlak my boss or place of work doesn't silence me. It doesn't say I have lost my right to speech protest or religion because I went to work. In fact, that's one of our problems that companies feel empowered to tell their employees they don't have the rights while using USA currency and not one military member or police officer will respond to that even if it is on camera on video. Not one person will smack sense into that witch thinks it has the power through monetary funding to remove your right to speak. It can't be free if I have to bend my knee to some douchebag