Vigano will soon be sede + Biden will soon be....
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 มิ.ย. 2024
- Matt and Kevin are back together again and start the show talking about the former American Nuncio is about to be excommunicated (though not really).
Check it out! - บันเทิง
Good idea! We need a qualified Catholic man to run for President, even as a write in. He may not win the first time, but it is a good start. Our Lady of Good Success, pray for us.
Vatican I was never closed. As such the standing Catholic bishop can gather to elect a pope. The college of cardinal is not an essential part of the Church and the Church did have it for the first 500 years. Roman Pontiff were not elected exclusively by cardinal for the first 1000 years. Catholic needs to gather to decide whether or not Francis is Catholic, that's what needs to be done, not to "depose" the pope.
Great Western Schism II. I'm all for it,we need a Pope and traditional Catholic unity.
I cannot agree more,at your comment, brother Harold truly the world per se, needs more vocations, more sacraments at least (I’m talking at the perspective of a person that was born and raised that lives in Puerto Rico 🇵🇷that sadly has no TLM available). But talking about the “bigger picture” about the topic.. the unity of all traditional Catholics needs to be done, as the sede clergy needs to get things straight and look at the need that the world have of the traditional mass and the sacraments especially to the newborn, children and young people even the ones that are in agony and need the extreme unction or people that are lost that need a word of encouragement and gain more souls to Our Lord..
@@Un5662 Amen! Pray for traditional Catholic unity. If i recall correctly,Puerto Rico has valid traditional Eastern Rites available.
@@E.C.2 yeah I heard about the Syriac-Orthodox churches in the island but i don’t think they are traditional..
@@Un5662 It's worth a look.
Today IS the Precios Blood...1st Class Feast Day.... sleep late....no work.... Feast!
In what country, may I ask?
@@davisfarm9 i LiVE in Ecuador
I understand "Archbishop" Vigano’s words from Friday, June 28 to be an explicit admission that he no longer recognizes Bergoglio to be a valid Pope because of Bergoglio’s heresies before during and after the conclave that elected him. Vigano also implies that Bergoglio’s predecessors going back to at least Paul VI weren’t valid Popes either.
Thank you to both of you. Keep up the great work. Kevin. Let us know about your carnivore diet My husband (also Kevin) loves that diet. i try to do more Keto. You will survive! I am sure you will.
I firmly believe that people like Taykor Marshall want thr easy way out. They don't want to grapple with the "hard questions". It is, actually, quite simple: a man is either ontologically pope, or he is not. A declaration by bishops doesn't change that fact.
What a declaration does is allow for the legal reality to be acknowledged, and thus begin the proceedings to elect a Pope.
The Church accepted St. Robert Bellarmine's opinion not only in the deliberations of Vatican I (as recounted in the book Life of Pope Leo XIII), but also in the 1917 CIC. "Ipso facto" means no declaration is necessary, it is an objectively true fact that a pope is not pope. People can either accept that and remove submission, or continue to follow a heretic pretender.
Everyone need someone like bishop Vigano as a pope. He can reunite all trads group. Even from sspx, indult and novus ordo ordinary priests which hidden because of scare. But they know that he is right.
He can united the semitrads but he's not going to united sedes, many of which know he's controlled opposition
He was consecrated a Bishop in the new order religion so it is questionable. Therefore Vigano could not be a uniter. He may be a personally holy man but is a questionable Bishop.
Williamson is controlled opposition. Vigano is sincere and still growing and learning the Sede positions and agrees with them more and more.
Could +Vigano call a Conclave?Fr Chazal stated +Ballini and +Wiliamaon conditionally Consecrated +Vigano earlier this year.
🙏
I don’t think one week is enough time to experience full metabolic reset. I’m sure you’re already onto Dr. Ken Berry. I also thought Kent Carnivore’s 10 min video entitled, “If we’re not Carnivore, Explain THIS! (Ep-2)” was packed with stunning anthropological info. And for “how did we get here” (history of ideas),this little video gives a great sketch: “The Role of the 7th Day Adventist Church in Manipulating the Dietary Guidelines.” Not the most entertaining speaker, but he makes very important points, which can be confirmed.
Yeah, it is more to see if I want to do it for 8 weeks later this summer......
@@catholicfamilypodcast5501 Drs Maliakkal and Stanislowski provided pivotal information to me--thank you for allowing them to share. Fr. DeSaye, recommending at the beginning of Lent 2024 to focus on a single fault, was also dispositive--I chose gluttony. I was blown away! As long as I have been a Catholic, I've never *really* understood gluttony as a "deadly" sin...but it is clear to me now, because of my own experience with heath, more importantly that of my son, doctors like the ones you host and other "out of the box" doctors online, our amazing priests and the Catholic Faith, that Satan (in a Screwtape kind of way), with the cooperation of souless corporate industry, is making hay out of our obsession to treat our tastebuds. Gluttony is the deadly sin no one takes too seriously. And it is deadly in more ways than one. Good luck on your carnivore trial. God bless you.
If an atheist layman, who don't believe in God and don't believe in the ceremony (lacks explicit intention, but just follow what his friend asked him to do), but baptize his friend maintaining the correct matter (water), and form full (Roman Ritual): Does lack of his intention make the baptism invalid?
I believe that it doesn't matter, and such baptism is valid.
If however essential words are omitted, water is not used, but mountain dew... this point to the malice, and to invalidity.
Therefore "Novus Ordo" rites of consecration, and ordination do exactly that. It's not necessarily intention, but it's invalid rite changed in a way to make it non-Catholic.
Canon 2200.2, 1917 Code: “Positing an external violation of the law, malice in the external forum is presumed until the contrary is proven.”
Conditional Baptism would be called for later, if possible, but it would most likely be valid. The intention needed for valid Baptism is “to do what the Church does.” It doesn’t require agreement with it, or any understanding beyond proper matter and form. But, this should only be done in danger of death, and should be done conditionally, by a priest, should the recipient remain alive long enough.
@@johncassani6780 maintaining rite / matter points to doing what the Church does. Of course in doubt the conditional baptism is always an option. I went with it myself, although if I would have my current understanding: I would consider my original infant baptism as valid.
Donald Trump Can be converted....it could depend on you. What are you doing for this ?