You wont believe the difference! Monitor Refresh rates test
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2021
- We put Gaming Monitor Refresh rates (Hz) to the test seeing what difference a high refresh rate actually makes!
▶ Visit the main WePC Channel here: / wepcreviews
💬 Join our Discord Server: / discord
💬 Find us on social media:
Tiktok: / wepc
Instagram: / wepcdotcom
Reddit: / wepc
Twitter: / wepc
Facebook: / wepcdotcom
#WePC #Shorts - เกม
"I didn't say refresh rate didn't matter, I said I couldn't afford it"
It's insane how good of a setup u can buy with how much a 360hz monitor cost
@@Pepo..yeah
are 30hz monitors a thing?
Literally
You can get a 165hz monitor for $130. I know that’s still a lot for some people, but it’s not as insane as everyone thinks about it.
Absolutely nobody says refresh rate doesn’t matter
You should go buy a ps4, and then maybe you will become one of those yourselves? they play GTA at 30fps and don't care, they think it looks smooth.
@@sens_120ms they play gta at 60fps
@@sens_120ms fps isnt hz....you need to distinguish. Just to add to this...because at some point it becomes important to distinguish between the fps of your game and the refresh rate of your monitor.
And to his test...you clearly see difference but tests with pros suggest: a.) You not get a pro with your monitor and b.) muscle memories for compensating input delay of that particular point seem to fade at upwards of 120 (better 144hz) to be negligable. Important is fps, other lags of hardware, etc.
They completely lack the important point, how the response times are on the 60hz monitor. While naturally faster displays respond faster.....but important also is the response time itself...and that not grey-to-grey bullshit but actual, proper response timings.
So, the test isnt really professional and lacks knowledge...BUT as said: Usually they are faster, but there are 240 or even 300+hz monitors with ceazy bad hardware, bad response times, etc.
@@MrStubbs8157 Damn the comment section, I know all about refresh rate, fps, response time, overdrive, pixel skipping and etc, Im not a console guy, dw,
As you was explaining, I know 360hz is worse than 240hz if response time, g2g, ghosting and shit is better on 240hz, Its typically what laptops dont quite get due to the thinner hardware, though I believe 360hz has caught back up to 240hz recently.
@@marceloktavianus766 you're wrong, it's a whole lot more than just fps and refresh rate, I alr know the stuff.
Or just be that one friend that never realised that their 240hz monitor was defaulted to 60hz for years 💀
😂😂😂
bro that's me I've been using my laptop for over a year and I only realised I've been on 60Hz this whole time (120 possible) 💀
Let's just say I'm enjoying the new refresh rate
it’s happened too many damn times
@@wesomefac2140how do you change it
@@o_mae lol then the experience must be like buying a new laptop.
"will you be sticking with your 60Hz or will you be upgrading". I'll gladly upgrade, just give me the money for it
Yeah, gimme
I got a 1440p 144hz for 250. 27 inches might I add. What a steal hug
Sceptre has pretty good monitors for theyre price, ive had a cheap curved monitor i bought years ago and has been with me all around the u.s. and is still perfect even now, im just looking for something bigger for a sim setup i wanna try out but on a budget
@@MADED1TS link ?
Broke ass
Why does bro sound like he is about to sneeze
🤣
@@semplefamilyemoji
@@anonymousesper9564 good eyes
pmsl
He was
This video was relevant back in the 2016 💀💀💀
Yeah, nearly everyone has high Hz now. Midwits don't turn it on in Windows settings.
@@VeroxusI still have 30hz
@@rudolfsgillsyour just stupid
@rudolfsgills you playing on a Nintendo 3ds?
@@Veroxusme with 75hz:
"exponentially"
When you care about fps but not about math
The marginal utility of refresh rate is exponential but the base is not greater than 1.
;)
@@Zenovarsevery smart :D
it's not actually linear. with 30fps, the time between frames is 33.3ms. at 60fps that lowers to 16.7ms. at 120 it's 8.3. the difference between 30 and 60 is greater than the difference between 60 and 120
@@lexd0gdiminishing returns, this is why i’ll save about 100 dollars in terms of going for a 2k 180hz setup vs a 2k 240hz setup with a marginal difference in frame time
Me watching this on 30 fps💀
how
@@tigeriily5059Maybe his mobile only supports 30hz refresh rate 😅
that doesn't make a differnce
@@coolmanthecool603 I see 😅
npc response@@SV_TUNZ
Ill buy a high hz display when i have the money for it
The Koorui 24E3 is $108 and it’s a 165hz, 1ms Ips panel with 99% sRGB. It’s a STEAL
144hz is dirt cheap
😂
@@noobs371WHAT NO FUCKING WAY
@@dooblom It’s back at $109 I would pick it up if I was you, I’m gonna buy it
Good thing my eyesight isn’t in 25% speed
your eyesight is way more accurate than a camera tho so you’ll notice the difference without needing the speed change
@@gabrielescaramuzzoTrue but you still notice it way less than in this video, 60hz is just fine if you dont have the money for better or just dont wanna spend the money on arguably negligible difference
@@SatanMcLovin the difference in responsiveness isn’t as dramatic, the difference in smoothness is waaay bigger than the video. at this point 144hz costs not much more than 60 so if you still need to buy a new monitor you might as well go for that one, assuming you’re not out of budget already
@@gabrielescaramuzzo I dont agree with the difference but yeah, youd probably have a harder time finding a 60hz monitor than a 144hz but if you already have a 60hz monitor i dont think its worth buying a new one until your old one either breaks or lasts long enough that its completely obsolete but thats just the anti consumerism inside me.
@@SatanMcLovin it all depends on what your priorities are tbh, some games feel completely different on a high refresh rate monitor, some not as much. If you’re just browsing its obviously not worth it even though still very noticeable.
And btw a high refresh rate monitor will last you just as much as a 60hz one, so easily 10-15 years, i wouldn’t really say you can’t still say fuck you to consumerism while enjoying the extra smoothness lol
upgraded from 60hz to 165hz, im never going back.
And that's why I'm not gonna buy a new monitor until I have a good PC. Nowadays I'm happy with my 60Hz
Team 165hz!
Exactly
fax i got a 165hz monitor about 2 years ago from a 60hz tv and its a life changer
I dont care about frame rate as long as its more than 15
After switching to 165hz monitor, my secondary 60hz monitor feels almost slow motion haha
the voices in bros head are the ones saying refresh rate doesn’t matter
My friend keeps on saying that because our eyes can only see up to 30fps it's the dumbest thing I've heard
@@b0wking119 wtf 😂 thats the dumbest thing i have ever heard
@@susmanjig.223 ikr 😂
@@b0wking119I think it's 60? Then its like smooth. More and you won't see a difference, but there might be less delay. Less and you can probably see it isn't smooth
@@Qtuberbutnot you cant put human eyesight at a definite fps cause we see faster than any frame rate
I don’t think you know what exponentially means
right, it's simply a constant delay
I think he meant to say significantly or substantially ☝️🤓👍
Footage slowed to 25% speed. Lol
Otherwise there will be no visible difference. What a stupid video xD
Because you watching this at your 60hz phone. That's why its get slowed. It's so obvious
@@MyFearGear I think you forget that TH-cam video compression also caps the framerate even if watching it on a 120hz phone.
Also if you tried it in real life, you would notice the lag is actually a lot less perceptible.
@@chenghoetan1920 well, if you get used to 120hz+ you will def start seeing 60hz as the new 30fps
@@redgfxr4095 depends. Some people can't and thats why they forget their monitor refresh rate is at 60hz in windows. If it was that obvious people would have noticed if their display was defaulted to 60hz. Some people can see the difference.
Comments here are all wild 💀
Just mived from 60hz to 144hz im actually having a smoother feel
I moved from 30hz to 240hz. My eyes are soo happy.
Got to try a 144hz monitor at my friend house once everything feel so god damn smooth
@@ricelordalt9183 144hz is the goat
is it worth it for a non-gamer? i play but casually and not so often. I mostly do office work.
@@noc427 it's worth it, you can get a 1080p 144hz monitor for 100 bucks
I have a 144hz and a 60hz monitor and the 144hz makes a huge visual difference
Especially when you go back to 60hz
disagree. I have a 4k 60hz, 1080p 75hz, and another 1080p 165hz and I personally prefer the a "cheap" 4k tv at 60hz over my 1080p gaming monitor at 165hz. 165hz only looks better when you're moving your mouse around. For gaming, it doesn't make that much of a huge difference unless you're playing competitive games, which I do not.
@@thelonercoder5816u understand u, i used to have a 165hz monitor sold it to buy a 4K 55” nanoled tv best thing i did (i only play single player titles w controller)
@@thelonercoder5816bravo well said, your mouse is really the only thing that looks slow, and anyone’s gonna run full graphics, so it’s not that much of an issue
@@thelonercoder5816bruh
Luckily our eyes perceive it at a speed of 100% not just 25
Our eyes can almost always tell the difference between 60hz and 144hz
I have i'd say decent eyes and i can notice a slight stutter when i compare a 144hz to 270hz its just hard to say "our eyes can only see this resolution" or "our eyes can only see this much hz" because we are way more complex
youtube videos cap at 60 fps, if you were seeing them side by side in person there'd be no need
The way he say "Monioer"😆
I have a 120HZ monitor and I say it makes an insane difference
Tbh, I think it's kinda subtle. I have a 144hz and there's not of a difference compared to the 60
Whats the difference
there us a huge difference
There will be no difference if your game runs at 60FPS or less.
@@p00lkingMake sure you actually have your monitor set to 144hz, I see people all the time that say this and then it turns out they never changed the setting to actually make it 144hz.
I’d say at least a 75hz monitor, it’s only 15hz but it’s noticeable for sure. 60hz just doesn’t cut it
Just overclock the 60 to 75
I once had 75hz and made an impactful experience from me, now I'm back to 60hz as 75hz gave up on me :(
Yes I have one that can go to 74.98hz
I miss my 75hz experience, don't have the budget to upgrade my monitor! I'm using a television that has 1366x768 as a monitor for 7years 60hz btw
@@stevie-g-123
@@Sequkoloverclock your 60hz to 74hz
"oh wilh ya be up'radin yoh monidah"
Now do oled test
Oh my god I had a 60hz monitor as of last week then got a 240hz monitor for my birthday. That shit was so unbelievably nice to change over to
I got a 240hz monitor too, it's a night and day difference.
Response time matters too. Fairly identical implies not the same, so that is going to impact greatly too
This☝️
And your personal response time matters as well. 600fps won't help if you have the reflexes of a sloth
And also if have bad ddr memory timings and frequency it will cause latency problems on all monitors and refresh rates. For example you cap your fps to your refresh rate and get 120 fps on both systems but they aren't the same 120fps if each frame is slightly delayed by bad timings. You could basically make the same looking video with both monitors on 120hz but one with optimized RAM and one without.
the only thing i dont like about higher refresh rate is that once you increase it, theres no going back
I'm just trying to remember even a single time someone said refresh rates don't matter in gaming...
Having a high refresh rate is a nice upgrade if you're gonna game
ima get a 165hz like inna week, rn i barely got 75hz
Lmk how 165hz feels imma get one too in a week from now
@@noobs371 bro its a big change, i had the 75hz for a while and i thought it was okay but then when i went from 165hz games ran smoother, and i have a 1ms response time so it feels much better it’s definitely worth it
of course it is i bought asus tuff i had 60 hz samsung and the display va panel fullhd and 120hz feels great@@joker12th
@@joker12thcan you set it at 130 and tell me if you notice any difference between that and 165? I’m wondering if I’m missing out on anything getting 130 only (120 base but it’s over clocked if you’re wondering about the weird refresh rate)
Trust me if you can, buy a 300hz
what's even the logic behind the window movements lagging on one monitor because of framerate?
Looks trippy... it's like seeing the better one is the 60hz but the actual one is laggy...
60Hz i enough i dont want spent more money on higher refresh rate
😂
understandable
because you never felt above 75hz after you tase 120above you never want to go back
@@arfianwismiga5912 i saw 120hz, it looks smoother,but 60 is enough
@@arfianwismiga5912 welp only if you play completive games then maybe. But I only play single player games so 60hz is still plenty for me.
That 240Hz panel still looks laggy.
I have several CRT TVs on my home, and a Plasma one, my phone has an OLED and it's way better than several LCDs out there, even high refresh rate ones.
This why affordable OLED monitors need to become a thing. I watch most movies on my phone because the colors and black levels are sooooo much better than any LCD in my house.
Most lcd gaming monitors are 1ms or 0.5ms response time. OLED has a much larger delay hence why it isn’t used for gaming monitors
@@loganmoynagh1109 The opposite, OLED has instant response time tied to the refresh rate (sample and hold blur), LCD has sample & hold blur plus the LCD crystals that blur the image.
It’s because it’s slowed down footage
@@flipdry look at the ktc m27t20 its a mini led which has comparable contrast to an oled monitor but its $450 on newegg
Now tell em about the price.
I'll take this into consideration next time i get stuck in slowmo
I think it's because of the latency. Mostly 60hrz monitors are so delayed at the input latency i guess. :/ and the modern 365 hrz 260-265 hrz to 144 hrz they are all super fast in terms of latency. :) yea frames does matter but it might be happening because of latency.
My old monitor latency was 12ms which is 1080p 60hrz and the current monitor is 1440p 165hrz with the 0.5ms latency. So ofcourse i see the same thing, if not more.
Most 1080p 60hrz monitors are super old so u may want to try some ultra low latency oled/super amoled which is also 60hrz to 90hrz. 😅 I don't know much about it still. This is my opinion on this.
i agree for this but i think this man uses 2 the same monitors but its not logical if he downgrades the refresh rate that its latency goes up. he must doing something like setting the monitor on energy saving mode to higher its latency
@@kanalkanali The 2 panels are the same, I think windows is automatically in a constant state of vsync ever since win 7. So think of it like this. The duration between frames at 60 hz is 16.66667ms and 144hz is 6.944445ms. When you move your mouse there is an equal chance to start moving the mouse early in that 16 ms than not. And if you did, the panel isn't drawing anything new until the NEXT cycle. But the 144hz in the second panel has the time to draw 2 complete frames in that time span. But on the OS side of things, windows is also synced to the faster refresh rate, not the slower one. Sooo it is actually registering the physical movement in between refresh rate cycles of the 'slower' monitor. Making it look like not only is the image smoother, but quicker latency too.
Although if you've used a phone with variable or multiple refresh rates you might actually notice that different modes also effect colour reproduction and subsequently latency too. So EVEN with the exact same display. Latency could be drastically different depending on the refresh rate set. Being optimised for one doesn't mean the other doesn't intrinsically leave the panel with the same latency. And the latency is never perfectly (1000ms/hz), that's just the absolute minimum.
With all that. TL:DR yes, changing JUST the refresh rate changes latency on the exact same display/s.
Lower refresh rate itself means higher delay, a 60hz monitor will show you a new picture in every 16,6666ms, while a 144hz one will do it every 6.94444ms, but it’s the same delay as you saw in monitor specs, that one is the time which the monitor need to show a picture it already got from the graphics card. You could have 2 60hz monitor with different delays, I had a setup with an old 1080p 60hz tv and a fairly basic 60hz monitor, you could easy tell just by looking at it that the tv had like a half second delay compared to the m because the electronics in the display have to process the data from the gpu, can’t simply just show it as it is
don't agree, wasting money on "low latency" 60-90Hz monitors is useless, better to get a regular 144Hz one, will feel way smoother, and still have lower latency
@@M1szS you could also get a 144hz monitor with higher latency, you might not feel it as much, but if you want to play any kind of kompetetive game, it matter a lot
Not just hz. More hz = less motion blur. And more hz can mean less delay. Furthermore less ghosting and less overshoot
Absolutely different parameters. A 120hz va can have much worse ghosting than a 60hz ips. Overshoot is dependent on the correct overdrive setting. And input delay... Well, that's another thing.
strobing your backlight can help reduce motion blur
Why so I should not get one. Because I play almost only story games. And there the motion blur stays on.
ive got too much network lag to be properly worrying about gpu to screen lag lol
@@lulu111_the_cool Motion blur can still be on, but it won't be as egregious. It will just feel more realistic and less confusing. Motion blur on low refresh rate panels is vomit inducing for me, but it's great on high refresh rate panels.
This just feels like my cable tv getting the relay 1s after my neighbor. But still showing the program at the same pace.
Wow 1s so much speed for someone who isn't making a living off gaming
Do the test again but with a game that your PC can't run more than 60fps constantly.
60hz for Netflix and browsing the net, 240hz for gaming
Bruh you can browse the web at 24Hz you don’t need 60Hz for the web. For Netflix you do want to get 60Hz though
@@pretty_bored But it looks smooth
@@Knight465 yeah it does, I would recommend 60Hz for scrolling, but you don’t NEED it
It’s really simple tbh
Single player games: 4k 60hz oled
Online competitive games: 1440 120hz+ ips
Broke: 1080p 60hz ta
@@fatphokingloser if you like wasting money, sure. Theres 120hz players on leaderboards on pretty much every competitive game, let alone console mfs on 60hz. 240hz wouldn't make as big of a difference as you think it does.
@@fatphokingloser it’s a minimum, *for you.* I can also tell the difference between 120 and 240, but I don’t get headaches at anything under 100 lmfao. If you genuinely get headaches under 100, and you aren’t exaggerating, you need a doctor bro. I’ve been gaming for like a whole decade and a half, mostly at 120hz, even then I really don’t mind gaming at 60, is it a bit annoying at first? Yeah but I get used to it in like 5 mins.
The single player games in question: Geometry Dash, and uh Geometry Dash
@@HyperNova808 well obviously by single player games I meant graphically intensive casual story based games, but even with Geometry Dash, there's no real need to go past 120.
@@Qwty163 I was making a joke anyway and you’re mostly right, but many people do upgrade (myself included) to make the game more responsive
Bro said exponentially 😂
he was trying his hardest out there
Are you restarted or sum
Watching that refresh rate comparison Hz my feelings.
Nobody says refresh rate doesn’t matter.
However as for this moment, you have to chose between good panel and good refresh rate.
You can’t have both without overpaying.
True AF, I want a good panel but I want a high color accurate monitor too though
facts. i wanted to buy the new samsung m8 cuz it‘s perfect looking but 60hz..
funny thing is that 4k monitors are easy to get personally i couldnt find gaming monitor which would have 4k and 24 inch while there is asus tuff 28 inch 4k but 6o hz
Maybe wouldn't go as far as say it doesn't matter but it does for me at least, matters less in non competitive single player games. I'll take higher graphic fidelity with 60fps in single player games. However I do think 30fps is too low.
I’ve seen people say you can’t see above 24 fps so no people definitely say it doesn’t matter
Just upgrade my Acer 29 200hz fhd curved ultra wide
My guy commenting his monitors specs individually 😂
in gaming, yes. but in daily stuff like web browsing and watching videos, i sometimes cant tell whether my 90hz mode is on or not in my laptop
I have never seen someone testing framerate like this on their monitors that's smart as hell
There was a odd sentence in the past: "Human eye can't catch after 60 HZ" yea yea we see that is true after in years.
and it is really true. When you see screens with a refresh rate higher than 60, you actually do not see a refresh rate higher than 60, but it is a quick response to actual movement, and to be logical, play with a frame rate of 60 and keep your screens at a refresh rate of 144hz You will see a very choppy image, but lower the screen refresh rate to 60hz You will find the game fast and smoother
@@Drawi.560 What about 60fps on 120hz it should be ok. At least on 60hz monitor 120fps is ok but for example 90 or 80 gets choppy. On 144Hz monitor try cap fps to 72 and see if it works better than 60.
@@Drawi.560we don’t see in frames, or refresh rates. We see infinite. The only reason we stop noticing the the frames past around 240 is because the amount of frames filling in the motion gaps gets much smaller- aka you can’t notice it as much. 60 isn’t enough to display fast motion so it will look like a slide show compared to 165+
I can absolutely see the diffrence on 60 fps video on youtube
That's why footage is 25% slowed down
I still remember playing in a dota lan at my university and they somehow messed up and only had 60hz monitors left for like two players, and i swear it felt like i was playing on a slideshow, literally felt like i was lagging nonstop the entire time. After u play on high refresh rate 60hz is literally unplayable
i was like started automatically walking towards nearest monitor shop while watching this video
I play cyberpunk ,raytracing set to physo, everything set to ultra,, dlss enable.. got around 30-45fps on my 165hz monitor..that's why refresh rate is not important for some hehe.. i prefer this ultra realistic graphic than having to set it to low setting for 100++ fps 😂
High refresh rates monitors are mostly for competitive games anyway that can push upto hundreds of fps on mid range PCs.
@@alieffauzanrizky72021440p 240hz is for my 7900xtx. Pushes like 200-400 fps in most games. Most ridiculous gpu I've ever bought
@seethe72 well yeah, if you have a 1050ti you probably shouldn't be buying a 240hz monitor unless you only play light esports titles. But anything above a 3080, you should probably have either a 4k 60hz or 1080p/1440p high refresh rate monitor, otherwise you're just wasting your gpu power.
I prefer framerate over graphics. Just a personal preference
Even years later, it still feels satisfying knowing we were right all along.
Back in 2006 i was using a 120hz CRT and laughed at people who thought it was inferior. Theyd usually have the argument of we can only see at 60hz or... God forbid 30.
Went from a TV to running 1600x1200 at 85hz on a 21" IBM trinitron CRT. Sadly the flyback went out so now I'm running a 144hz mini led monitor.
Feels Fantastic and looks stunning.
True but still some people think it's hard to notice the difference because they never tried it
Now I've started using OLED Smart glasses.
120hz with 0 pixel lag. No ghosting and colours are even better than CRT.
Best thing is I get to use it anywhere.
Now I can play on my laptop in any position with the lid closed and using wireless. literally lying flat in bed under the covers to keep warm with the exhaust blowing warm air at me with a nice cup of tea and a purring kitty ontop.
Best fucking feeling on earth.
Me:Yes
My wallet:No
Play the footage at regular speed. And lets see the visual difference
You can set playback yourself. But anyhow, since TH-cam only plays videos at 60 frames per second, you wouldn't be able to see the difference.
Back in the days we don't give a f about refresh rate 😪
i have one 360 hz and one 240 and its SOOO amazing refresh rate matters and A LOT.
I have 2 different ones with 2 different refresh rates. And I love this.
“I’ve been clapping … year olds” shouldn’t be said even with context 😭😭 *4:08*
If you're on mobile fps gaming then 120fps is a pro
What the fuck are you talking about
Who even plays on mobile lmao
@@Josher_C.fr that shi aint fun
They aren’t important for casual gaming, 1080p 60hz is perfectly fine
100%. For competitive gaming though it’s recommended/necessary to have 120hz after that there no point of going higher refresh rate
LOL yeah it's fine for chess
@@Blox117chess 240 fps superior 😊
I get sick moving a cursor under 240hz
it isn't important for playing games at all
I tried my laptop screen vs my laptop screen with a monitor, and i will never be using a monitor with it again.
I literally just went from 4k60 to 2k180hz and I don't think I can go back now.
I'll stick with 60Hz , atleast for now
i feel like when they mean you don't need a 60hz monitor
they mean you don't need a 60hz monitor to have fun
Me chill in tbe corner with 45hz😂
ggs brother
I switched from a 60Hz monitor to a 61Hz monitor and I'm never going back.
Got a 165hz monitor so im good for now
You’re kinda good forever, all you really need is 120-144hz after that the difference is minimal so 240hz is pointless really unless you’re super competitive
@@noobs371 between 1ms and 4 ms there is many differences for competitive game like valorant ?
@@ktn772no but be aware thoose manufacture specs aren't accurate,there are tech reviewers that do test them in realistic scenarios like Hardware Unboxed for example that's where you can get some real answers and not spec sheet bollocks highly innacurate
@noobs371 165 to 240 is absolutely a noticeable difference to me, not necessarily night and day but I can easily tell them apart.
slowed 25% lol I guess this convinced me more to stay on 60 hz 😂
It's slowed to 25% to show what's happening to your slowed to 25% brain.
It's to show you the difference....
@@angelaizen2231 Ad nominem isnt a good argument
it’s just to highlight the difference for the video. if youre gaming, 60hz simply doesn’t cut it anymore, it’s also not like 140hz monitors are significantly more expensive.
yea bc hes gonna show the difference between 240hz and 60hz on a 60fps video
Bro...i used a monitor my uncle gave my dad in 2010 or 2009 thats 60hz.I switched to 144hz like 4 months ago AND IT WAS A REALLY BIG DIFFERENCE.If you can afford either 120hz or 144hz its a really good upgrade.
The problem is, the monitors with the highest refresh rates are TN panels which fall behind in other areas.
me who uses a 75hz HP monitor
It doesn't matter ,i have 165hz 120 Hz and 75 hz ,owh yah and 90hz and I still prefer 60 hz
Prob havent even set it in the settings
Of course you have all those high refresh rates and still prefer 60 hz very true
You need to set your refresh rate to max after plugging in 😂😂😂
sure bro
That’s wild huge advantage
Upgraded from 75hz to 240hz. At first I didn't think that the difference would be noticeable, but I was wrong, really, really wrong.
144hz 2k here
That's what i want. I only have a 3060ti so I don't want to overspend on a monitor that I won't be able to get the most out of. It's either gonna be 4k 60hz or 2k 144hz (maybe 120?)
@@JakobeOG I got two 27inch 1440p 144hz monitors and it is wonderful (upgraded from 1080p 60hz) I wouldn't chose 4K monitor unless you have really good graphics card. and don't go more than 27inch monitor on 2K resolution.
would you say a 144hz monitor is worth it for office work ?
@noc427 no why would anyone need more than 60hz for office work? The cost for 144hz is almost double for what 60hz monitors go for
@@JakobeOG I've heard that the higher the refresh rate, the more restful it is for your eyes or something like that. I've never used a high-refresh-rate monitor so idont know
Some people I’ve talked swears up and down that 60hz is all we need… if only they weren’t so stupid
You only need it if you are a hardcore in fps games lmao, its not that we are going to watch a movie at 300 hz 😂
It has some appeal but 60 is still the standard it's hard to get used to 240hz when you mainly see it on Fortnite or CS and then you go to Cyberpunk or Alan wake 2 and not even a 4090 can achieve those frames on high settings. Given on steam survey the most average gpu is the 3060 yeah I can't recommend people buy above 144hz
You nmonky need 120hz or higher in faced paced games. Games like minecraft, or gta, which don't require much camera movement, high refresh rate won't give much of a change.
Some people can't afford at least 144hz monitor, then saying 60hz is enough. I am using 144hz and when I try going back to 60hz, it is giving me eyesore and migraine.
You are right. 30 the way to go
It's not just that it also reduce input legs
ill buy a high hz monitor when i have the money
maybe i just cant afford a better monitor
Go to work man.
@@wizwille2146 IF I COULD I WOULD IM FUCKING 14
@@_Q9-you could work at mcdonald’s rn
@@_Q9-you can, you're just a lazy child. When I was 13 I was going to the tomato greenhouses to work there.
@@GroteGlon hahahaha i wish i could find a job, i live in a big city there are not much options for me basically none and how do you assume that im lazy thats just a cocky thing to say
Nobody ever told me that the refresh rate isn't important, however I heard stuff like "more than 144hz is unnecessary unless you are a professional player playing in a tournament"
Not unnecessary, it is always more comfortable for brain to follow smoother framed animation, but it is not worth it, more Hz requires also more FPS, so the whole system will cost a lot, but regular player will not get as much of benefit for the price he will pay for such hardware.
If simplify.
That one guy playing with 60hz, 30fps, 200 ping
You see that big difference???
Now pay 2500$
You can get a 240 hz monitor for less then $200 these days. Spend a couple hundred more and you can get a pretty premium experience along with it. Displays are dirt cheap
I can’t notice the difference unless they are directly next to each other
Odd, I can instantly tell 60hz from 144hz just by using it for 5 seconds. 60 just feels and looks choppy and much less smooth. It's the biggest leap in look and feel
@@RemedieXfr
Using 75 hz for 7 years and its very enough for me
Thats what i thought about 60hz until i got a 144hz and then a 240hz
5 years on 60hz yesterday i upgraded to 165,the diff is enormous
Shoutout to youtube for limiting videos on 60hz
One small issue, My monitor is integrated
When I moved from my laptop (that has 60Hz) to my desktop PC with a monitor where I use 120Hz, the difference was so noticeable that playing games on my gaming laptop felt extremely shit.
I went back to 60hz when i realized my latop was on 120hz
such a shame people doesn't understand response time vs fps
To his credit, he could have not put the "slowed to 25%" note
I'm glad my eyes don't tell a difference
yeah the camera filming this video can record the difference
And most people can notice it irl
My 7gen i5 and GTX1050m: Let us goooo!!!!
Yeah. It doesn't matter until I play the game in 0.25x speed.😅
I ain’t tryna go broke
it matters if u can manually slowdown the speed of your vision like that.
Me playing on Nintendo switch: "this is fine 😢."