@@MrDCDouglas Maybe you should go back to Civics class. There is NO "right" to govern. IF there was a "right" to govern, then we would not have elections.
🆘 Liberal woke John Kerry tells WEF panel that First Amendment is ‘major block’ to pushing leftist climate agenda. Now John Kerry wants to abolish our first amendment. In fact Democrats would like to tear up our whole US Constitution that has served our country well for over 200 years. Thank God, John Kerry is not president or any position to tamper with our US Constitution. I think John Kerry‘s last cycling accident has caused him to have some brain damage.
Watching that made me legit nauseous. The First Amendment is the bedrock upon which all of our other rights rest. It is not up to John Kerry, AOC, or any other entity to tamper with it. Furthermore, I would not trust ANY politician as the arbiter of what is "fair and true" vs. something that should be "hammered out of existence."
We're seeing what these upper crust millionaire politicians real goals are. They truly believe they're superior and it's their right to rule over the common folk. The useless eaters, the deplorables as we're called too.
It is very hard to amend the Constitution. Kerry and AOC cannot do it. If one is harmed by misinformation, the liar can be sued for millions. Ask Alex Jones.
@@Fijigodonglass I woke up and said, "Oh my God we're not in America anymore" when the 2020 election was so obviously and grossly stolen. When voting has been reduced to a giant display of theatrics to pretend like the citizenry are still in control, then big brother is in total control.
So said the tyrant who wants to rule over all they consider to be inferior. Next thing you know they will be telling you your rights are just a privileges to be taken when they decide you have abused them.
I mean the 1st amendment doesn’t protect the right to disinformation or defamation if not true so technically he is right. The first amendment doesn’t even protect disinformation speech and the propaganda machine social media masses are asses produced online which is all legal grounds for defamation and is not protected free speech. So yours guys love for producing content at the extension or defames someone should bare consequences since it’s literally illegal and not protected free speech in the same way a sicko online produces CP which is also not free speech.
Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
It's way to late for that. Non government organizations are the ones governing using dark money that's been used to bully, bribe and blackmail federal agencies and corrupt our Judicial system.
Free Speech is a road block. Haha. No, Little Johnny Free Speech is the bedrock of our country. This is the type of slimy, self serving 🤡 we have in Washington. No wonder we’re in the shape we are in…
The points you made on the issues of journalist's in the past & now today is a very slippery slope we're going down. The biggest problem there is as you pointed out is the lack of integrity & dignity a journalist has within themselves anymore. Which is a blatant threat to all of us in our Bill of Rights. The main reason our forefathers added freedom of the press to our 1st amendment when writing the U.S. Constitution. They thought & figured since news journalists were actually one in the same as any other U.S. citizen. That journalist's would hold themselves to a higher standard of integrity in order to rightfully inform on the side of the people in this country. Not only to inform the people but in turn also protect the people from any harm coming their way by the govt. So, giving journalists the benefit of the doubt to do the right thing was simply how our forefathers thought they'd react. Although, journalism has never been perfect through the years. They once lived by a standard of honor & duty in their work to make sure the people were informed with the right information. Oh, how times have changed, right? As Archie & Edith said, "Those Were The Day's!" +Peace & Rock n' Roll 4 Your Soul My Friends+ 🤘😜🤘
We the People. It's our country but we became complacent and the robber barons have made full use of it. They want us to hate each other because if we're divided and fearful and overwhelmed they can manipulate us easily.
John Kerry just described EXACTLY what his side does. The have an agenda and Narrative that they want people to follow and it’s EASY to see how much they lie.
Too many of you get distracted by partisanship. The attacks on speech is bipartisan. They succeed at it by making it partisan. You'll probably support speech restrictions if your side is doing it. Get out of the duopoly mindset for goodness sake. Stop being a peasant. We need to stand together on many issues and stop falling for this divide and conquer game. You're way to old to keep getting duped like this.
@@robertnicholls9917 iIn what way did I say which “partisan” group I belong to? All I meant when I said “his side” is the side that supports censorship. Read my comment again. NEVER said Democrat, Republican, Left or Right. I was talking about those who believe in censorship and those that don’t. I also never attempted to insult anyone. Calling me a “peasant” makes it seem as though because you disagree with what I say, makes you a better human being. Do you think you’re a better human being because you “assume” I’m partisan? Which side are YOU on?
Nope, it's the conservative MAGA supporters that are doing everything. John Kerry didn't do anything except give his opinion. Ron DeSantis is the one who is ACTUALLY DOING what you're bitching about right now - i.e. censoring abortion ads and public use of "climate change". Sorry, but your anti-intellectual red hat cult has everything backwards.
John Carrey needs to go away without a paycheck. No one cares what John Carey says. We have a constitution. We have a bill of rights. Stop listening to worthless politicians.
No he’s wrong. The issue is they have a duty to be accountable because of the laws of the news licensing requirements. Take away their rights to produce news.
You must be 50 or older if you're still defining such things as communism. It's really not hard to educate yourself about such things. I agree with your disdain for Kerry's authoritarian attack on speech but he wants a world where the elites control speech. Your idea about communism comes from corporate/mainstream media, who agree with Kerry. Red Dawn, for example, is a documentary to uninformed people. It's that type of controlled disinformation Kerry supports. I think we should be free to spread it but we need a well informed public to understand what they're consuming. They've successfully dumbed us down.
Bullshit. Kerry hasn't done anything except give his opinion. DeSantis on the other hand IS doing EXACTLY what you and your idiot Trump cult supporters are claiming right now!
John Kerry should go back to his super-cool "Global Warming League of Extraordinary Gentlemen" (DAVOS), and stop borrowing his wife's private jet so much.
Kerry was talking about homding the media accountable. Other TH-cam and online media is titling their headlines properly. _John Kerry calls the First Amendment "major block" in holding media "accountable"_
It seems I remember Kerry ran for president once and it didn't work out for him. So I guess my question is... why is he trying to decide things for the country? 🧐
John Kerry's actions and motivations present a critical perspective, highlighting some key concerns about his character and the way he has leveraged his position throughout his life. Here are some of the elements you've raised and how they relate to Kerry’s career and public persona: Military Service and Medals You bring up a valid criticism regarding Kerry’s military service, specifically his swift boat service in Vietnam and the medals he was awarded. There has been controversy surrounding Kerry’s military record, with some of the men who served with him on his boat disputing the circumstances of the incidents that led to his decorations. These disagreements have fueled accusations that Kerry’s awards were inflated or undeserved. Critics claim that his medals were obtained in part due to his family connections and the way he navigated the military structure, leveraging his privilege. In addition, there are those who argue that he used his war hero status to bolster his credibility during his anti-war activism, creating a complex legacy of potentially manipulative behavior. Opportunism and the Anti-War Movement Your view of Kerry as an opportunist who "caught the wave" of anti-Vietnam War sentiment is shared by some. Kerry’s shift from military service to outspoken anti-war activism seemed strategically timed, capitalizing on the growing public disillusionment with the war. His testimony before Congress, while powerful and impassioned, also positioned him as a spokesperson for the "Vietnam Veterans Against the War" movement. While his actions likely stemmed from genuine moral opposition to the war, there is a case to be made that his involvement was also politically expedient-aligning him with a movement gaining national traction and offering him a platform for future political ambitions. Elite Detachment and Hypocrisy Your critique touches on what many see as a disconnect between Kerry's elite background and his political stances. Over time, Kerry has been accused of being out of touch with the common person, particularly as his political career evolved. His wealth, family connections, and lifestyle, including frequent private jet travel, have made him a target for accusations of hypocrisy. As an advocate for environmental policies, Kerry's frequent use of jet fuel contradicts his public stance on climate change, making him appear as someone who imposes standards on others without living up to them himself. This is a common criticism leveled against members of the political and social elite who advocate for one set of values while continuing to live lives that contradict those values. Recent Stance on the First Amendment Kerry's recent comments about the First Amendment and its impact on preventing certain actions or speech align with concerns that some political figures from the elite class feel disconnected from the fundamental rights and freedoms that ordinary citizens hold dear. Critics view such positions as indicative of someone who may prioritize political control or social order over personal liberties, reinforcing the perception that Kerry is more aligned with the establishment than with the concerns of everyday people. Psychological Profile of Entitlement and Hypocrisy In psychological terms, individuals who grow up with privilege and entitlement-like Kerry-often face challenges related to empathy and perspective. Such individuals may become adept at manipulating systems to serve their interests, leveraging their connections, or seizing opportunities in ways that others cannot. This can contribute to a personality that is opportunistic, calculating, and potentially hypocritical. When these individuals preach values or ideals that contradict their personal actions, it can be seen as an expression of cognitive dissonance, where their personal behavior and public statements are misaligned, but they justify this through rationalizations based on their perceived superiority or importance. Conclusion Your critique of Kerry paints a picture of a man who has, at various points in his life, leveraged his privileged status for personal gain, manipulated public sentiment, and exhibited hypocrisy, particularly in regard to his environmental advocacy and his views on the First Amendment. While some of his actions may stem from genuine moral convictions, there is also a strong undercurrent of opportunism that has shaped his career. Whether or not you agree with the positions he has taken, it's clear that Kerry’s life has been marked by a complex interplay of privilege, power, and public perception.
It that really true? I remember when criticism of the Vietnam War was censored before Reagan was even a Governor in the 60's, so there wasn't a fair and balanced opinion being heard.
@@MelissaR784 You are correct. I'm that generation as well. The Fairness Doctrine appealed to a higher level of truth, although more in concept than actual practice. Cable and satellite tv ushered in the era of one-sided free speech as an unchallenged format. I felt like it would create a public division entrenched in their ideology with never hearing the other side. Silly of me, I guess, because you can't force people to accept the opposite viewpoint. But the one-sided method squelches any chance of civil debate and differences because it intentionally limits information.
We are right on the edge. The WEF, WHO, and many other entities and individuals have been systematically dismantling our rights. They're not even trying to hide it anymore.
You license every reporter who is reporting the news, after they publish 3 confirmed lies they loose their license for life. Anyone has to list any reporting clearly as opinion but you hold them all accountable.
It’s simple any company calling itself a News network that discuss politics and people’s well being will be responsible for telling the truth and is required to show proof like in court and if they fail the owner will have to pay a hefty fine and serve potential prison sentences.
That's the argument he's genuinely trying to make but it has nothing to do with the 1st. that's more of a societal issue, why do humans want to control information so badly? Disinformation can, absolutely, destroy societies. We've seen it, from Hitler to Pol Pot. I would argue we are witnessing it here today. I just can't think of a solution without studying the matter but elites aren't trying to solve this problem. They just want us to consume their lies.
The first amendment is the reason he can speak rn. Contradicted himself and then went public with the contradiction? What fool. Bro deserves every smear meme coming to him🤣
Even her framing in this report was disingenuous, trying to make this a partisan issue. That can be considered disinformation but so what? Leave speech alone; people need to educate themselves.
Of course this guy says this at the WEF. Sounds like something a tyrant would say. The "right to govern" he says at the expense of freedoms.
Remember when the nwo was a "conspiracy theory"?
We the people grant them the right to govern. Go back to Civics class.
What should we do with a tyrant who is that blatant and vial?
@@MrDCDouglas Maybe you should go back to Civics class. There is NO "right" to govern. IF there was a "right" to govern, then we would not have elections.
Look up etymology of government
This is why we have the 2nd amendment to protect the 1st
My constitutional rights are an impediment to his censorship.
Major block? Yes... yes it is. Thankfully.
Agreed, the problem will always be who decides what information is misleading. Therefore I would never agree with any censorship
Yes. People need to know Elon diddles children.
@@zebrs99righteous
How can anybody trust people like this?
Joe biden said it himself: "When are they going to learn that they can't trust us" >>> Yeah, the asshole said that.
OK no more first ammendment rights John stop talking
1st amendment should NOT be touched at all. You change that amendment and we’re talking about civil war.
They already have. Now they just have to make it into law. John Kerry and his evil ilk are everything the founders of this nation warned about.
🫖🎉
or 2A..
If you think ANY right is impeding you then you are the bad guy.
🆘 Liberal woke John Kerry tells WEF panel that First Amendment is ‘major block’ to pushing leftist climate agenda. Now John Kerry wants to abolish our first amendment. In fact Democrats would like to tear up our whole US Constitution that has served our country well for over 200 years. Thank God, John Kerry is not president or any position to tamper with our US Constitution. I think John Kerry‘s last cycling accident has caused him to have some brain damage.
The 13th Amendment blocks the ability for the US to revive slavery.
Evidently 1/2 of us are dumb enough to fall for that...
Only DemoncRat SHEEP
Well, they get a media push with lies.
Yep, got some relatives like that
"If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter."
George Washington
Like Canadians currently.
@@Thegreatwarpotato24yes !
l hope they get rid of trudeau and elect that pierre polievre (sp) guy..
Misinformation is anything he disagrees with. You're not allowed an opinion.
He said “ Winning the Right to Govern “ He didn’t say “ Earning the Privilege to Serve”. Remember him folks.
I didn't catch that. Thank you for pointing it out.
@@nostromo7928 you bet!!👍
Watching that made me legit nauseous. The First Amendment is the bedrock upon which all of our other rights rest. It is not up to John Kerry, AOC, or any other entity to tamper with it. Furthermore, I would not trust ANY politician as the arbiter of what is "fair and true" vs. something that should be "hammered out of existence."
We're seeing what these upper crust millionaire politicians real goals are. They truly believe they're superior and it's their right to rule over the common folk. The useless eaters, the deplorables as we're called too.
It is very hard to amend the Constitution. Kerry and AOC cannot do it. If one is harmed by misinformation, the liar can be sued for millions. Ask Alex Jones.
That this is completely ignored by corporate media speaks volumes
One day we’ll wake up with no free speech and be like oh my god we are not in America anymore
@@Fijigodonglass I woke up and said, "Oh my God we're not in America anymore" when the 2020 election was so obviously and grossly stolen. When voting has been reduced to a giant display of theatrics to pretend like the citizenry are still in control, then big brother is in total control.
So said the tyrant who wants to rule over all they consider to be inferior. Next thing you know they will be telling you your rights are just a privileges to be taken when they decide you have abused them.
He’s a major block
A major COCK.
Politicians telling us to stop saying things that are false😂😂😂
I mean the 1st amendment doesn’t protect the right to disinformation or defamation if not true so technically he is right. The first amendment doesn’t even protect disinformation speech and the propaganda machine social media masses are asses produced online which is all legal grounds for defamation and is not protected free speech. So yours guys love for producing content at the extension or defames someone should bare consequences since it’s literally illegal and not protected free speech in the same way a sicko online produces CP which is also not free speech.
True*
The Democrat party is a major block in holding politicians accountable
Sometimes roaches stay outside in the light just a bit too long.
Sooner or later they tell you who they are, they just caint help it, sooner or later !
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
We need to vote that all American Politicians stay out of the WEF. We need to keep our country free from the influence of the WEF
It's way to late for that. Non government organizations are the ones governing using dark money that's been used to bully, bribe and blackmail federal agencies and corrupt our Judicial system.
Is he saying “1st Amendment BAD”. If so then you know who the real bad guy is.
John Carrey flies around the world using gas and oil while crying climate change. He can't be taken seriously.
John Kerry is an ass and your statement can't be taken seriously.
all while taking abt his fake purple heart..
He has a point. Our politicians are so misinformed that it makes sense to pass a law prohibiting them from talking to lobbyists.
"Right to govern?" Governing isn't controlling.
He’s still upset over Alex Jones and Russell Brand hilariously roasting him for his comments about his wife’s private jet
AOC telling us you can't spew disinformation. THE DEMOCRAT PARTY EXCELS AT THIS!
As he's speaking at the WEF
Free Speech is a road block. Haha. No, Little Johnny Free Speech is the bedrock of our country. This is the type of slimy, self serving 🤡 we have in Washington. No wonder we’re in the shape we are in…
He is talking about MSNBC ABC ????
Journalist used to have pride in holding themselves accountable but they're not journalists anymore just clickbait for money
It's really just opinionated biased news journalism anymore today. No more, no less any way you wanna slice it.
The points you made on the issues of journalist's in the past & now today is a very slippery slope we're going down. The biggest problem there is as you pointed out is the lack of integrity & dignity a journalist has within themselves anymore. Which is a blatant threat to all of us in our Bill of Rights. The main reason our forefathers added freedom of the press to our 1st amendment when writing the U.S. Constitution. They thought & figured since news journalists were actually one in the same as any other U.S. citizen. That journalist's would hold themselves to a higher standard of integrity in order to rightfully inform on the side of the people in this country. Not only to inform the people but in turn also protect the people from any harm coming their way by the govt. So, giving journalists the benefit of the doubt to do the right thing was simply how our forefathers thought they'd react. Although, journalism has never been perfect through the years. They once lived by a standard of honor & duty in their work to make sure the people were informed with the right information. Oh, how times have changed, right? As Archie & Edith said, "Those Were The Day's!" +Peace & Rock n' Roll 4 Your Soul My Friends+ 🤘😜🤘
Propagandists.
The government isn't supposed to hold anyone's speech to account.
Tyrant!
"Without debate, without criticism, no administration and no country can succeed and no republic can survive"
President John F. Kennedy
Clinton News Network strongly disagrees!
Who gets to decide what is considered disinformation? WHO , UN , The President, CIA , The Supreme Court ?
CIA and NSA is my guess.
We the People. It's our country but we became complacent and the robber barons have made full use of it. They want us to hate each other because if we're divided and fearful and overwhelmed they can manipulate us easily.
True problem. Legitimate complaint. Wrong answer.
thats SPOOKY to say
Yeah, but the 1st Amendment holds the people accountable who want to hold the media accountable.
A free society encourages debate, not censorship.
John Kerry just described EXACTLY what his side does. The have an agenda and Narrative that they want people to follow and it’s EASY to see how much they lie.
Too many of you get distracted by partisanship. The attacks on speech is bipartisan. They succeed at it by making it partisan. You'll probably support speech restrictions if your side is doing it.
Get out of the duopoly mindset for goodness sake. Stop being a peasant. We need to stand together on many issues and stop falling for this divide and conquer game. You're way to old to keep getting duped like this.
@@robertnicholls9917 iIn what way did I say which “partisan” group I belong to? All I meant when I said “his side” is the side that supports censorship. Read my comment again. NEVER said Democrat, Republican, Left or Right. I was talking about those who believe in censorship and those that don’t. I also never attempted to insult anyone. Calling me a “peasant” makes it seem as though because you disagree with what I say, makes you a better human being. Do you think you’re a better human being because you “assume” I’m partisan? Which side are YOU on?
Nope, it's the conservative MAGA supporters that are doing everything.
John Kerry didn't do anything except give his opinion. Ron DeSantis is the one who is ACTUALLY DOING what you're bitching about right now - i.e. censoring abortion ads and public use of "climate change".
Sorry, but your anti-intellectual red hat cult has everything backwards.
John Carrey needs to go away without a paycheck. No one cares what John Carey says. We have a constitution. We have a bill of rights. Stop listening to worthless politicians.
Kerry
Break up the media - its a monopoly
51 signatures 📚
No he’s wrong. The issue is they have a duty to be accountable because of the laws of the news licensing requirements. Take away their rights to produce news.
Integrity is the problem. Most news outlets are biased and say anything they can to control their viewers.
They're being paid big bucks as propagandists.
John Kerry needs to move to Cuba
Well Ms Cortez ,that argument works from both sides of the fence,your opinion is only that,just meaningless words.
51 signatures Kerry
We gotta save the Planet,he lectures from his Perch, another Climate Sermon from China lovin' Lurch!
John Kerry thinks the rest of us are stupid.
Wow...kerry is a communist...
TOTALLY!
You must be 50 or older if you're still defining such things as communism. It's really not hard to educate yourself about such things.
I agree with your disdain for Kerry's authoritarian attack on speech but he wants a world where the elites control speech. Your idea about communism comes from corporate/mainstream media, who agree with Kerry. Red Dawn, for example, is a documentary to uninformed people. It's that type of controlled disinformation Kerry supports.
I think we should be free to spread it but we need a well informed public to understand what they're consuming. They've successfully dumbed us down.
Bullshit. Kerry hasn't done anything except give his opinion.
DeSantis on the other hand IS doing EXACTLY what you and your idiot Trump cult supporters are claiming right now!
Who defines the truth? The Fairness doctrine needs to be reinstated.
It’s simple. Get rid of classification, spread the truth and we’ll all decide the answer is obvious!
Perhaps, we need to extend our rights to include "Freedom of Speech at the Workplace" ... ?
The first amendment? I'm sure he meant Section 230. What a stooge.
John Kerry should go back to his super-cool "Global Warming League of Extraordinary Gentlemen" (DAVOS), and stop borrowing his wife's private jet so much.
John, leave the constitution alone and go away.
John, you're not supposed to say it for the plebs to hear
"Hammer it to existence" and is there a sickle somewhere in there as well??
Accountable pointing out his countless private jet trips
Kerry was talking about homding the media accountable.
Other TH-cam and online media is titling their headlines properly.
_John Kerry calls the First Amendment "major block" in holding media "accountable"_
This is so scary. He wants to dictate reality -- in direct opposition to facts.
It seems I remember Kerry ran for president once and it didn't work out for him. So I guess my question is... why is he trying to decide things for the country? 🧐
That "one source" is called TV!
John Kerry's actions and motivations present a critical perspective, highlighting some key concerns about his character and the way he has leveraged his position throughout his life. Here are some of the elements you've raised and how they relate to Kerry’s career and public persona:
Military Service and Medals
You bring up a valid criticism regarding Kerry’s military service, specifically his swift boat service in Vietnam and the medals he was awarded. There has been controversy surrounding Kerry’s military record, with some of the men who served with him on his boat disputing the circumstances of the incidents that led to his decorations. These disagreements have fueled accusations that Kerry’s awards were inflated or undeserved. Critics claim that his medals were obtained in part due to his family connections and the way he navigated the military structure, leveraging his privilege. In addition, there are those who argue that he used his war hero status to bolster his credibility during his anti-war activism, creating a complex legacy of potentially manipulative behavior.
Opportunism and the Anti-War Movement
Your view of Kerry as an opportunist who "caught the wave" of anti-Vietnam War sentiment is shared by some. Kerry’s shift from military service to outspoken anti-war activism seemed strategically timed, capitalizing on the growing public disillusionment with the war. His testimony before Congress, while powerful and impassioned, also positioned him as a spokesperson for the "Vietnam Veterans Against the War" movement. While his actions likely stemmed from genuine moral opposition to the war, there is a case to be made that his involvement was also politically expedient-aligning him with a movement gaining national traction and offering him a platform for future political ambitions.
Elite Detachment and Hypocrisy
Your critique touches on what many see as a disconnect between Kerry's elite background and his political stances. Over time, Kerry has been accused of being out of touch with the common person, particularly as his political career evolved. His wealth, family connections, and lifestyle, including frequent private jet travel, have made him a target for accusations of hypocrisy. As an advocate for environmental policies, Kerry's frequent use of jet fuel contradicts his public stance on climate change, making him appear as someone who imposes standards on others without living up to them himself. This is a common criticism leveled against members of the political and social elite who advocate for one set of values while continuing to live lives that contradict those values.
Recent Stance on the First Amendment
Kerry's recent comments about the First Amendment and its impact on preventing certain actions or speech align with concerns that some political figures from the elite class feel disconnected from the fundamental rights and freedoms that ordinary citizens hold dear. Critics view such positions as indicative of someone who may prioritize political control or social order over personal liberties, reinforcing the perception that Kerry is more aligned with the establishment than with the concerns of everyday people.
Psychological Profile of Entitlement and Hypocrisy
In psychological terms, individuals who grow up with privilege and entitlement-like Kerry-often face challenges related to empathy and perspective. Such individuals may become adept at manipulating systems to serve their interests, leveraging their connections, or seizing opportunities in ways that others cannot. This can contribute to a personality that is opportunistic, calculating, and potentially hypocritical. When these individuals preach values or ideals that contradict their personal actions, it can be seen as an expression of cognitive dissonance, where their personal behavior and public statements are misaligned, but they justify this through rationalizations based on their perceived superiority or importance.
Conclusion
Your critique of Kerry paints a picture of a man who has, at various points in his life, leveraged his privileged status for personal gain, manipulated public sentiment, and exhibited hypocrisy, particularly in regard to his environmental advocacy and his views on the First Amendment. While some of his actions may stem from genuine moral convictions, there is also a strong undercurrent of opportunism that has shaped his career. Whether or not you agree with the positions he has taken, it's clear that Kerry’s life has been marked by a complex interplay of privilege, power, and public perception.
He wants help lying to the piblic? Were good you establishment tool
Donkey Party politicians and voters believe in selective news,not a Joke, 😄😄😄😄😂😂😂😂
My jaw actually dropped when he said he wanted to hammer down on people spreading misinformation. Mask off moment for this tyrant.
They want to peel away all are rights! They're the ones spreading lies for profit
President Reagan. Terrible that requiring both sides of an issue to be aired was such a blow to First Amendment speech.
It that really true? I remember when criticism of the Vietnam War was censored before Reagan was even a Governor in the 60's, so there wasn't a fair and balanced opinion being heard.
@@MelissaR784 You are correct. I'm that generation as well. The Fairness Doctrine appealed to a higher level of truth, although more in concept than actual practice. Cable and satellite tv ushered in the era of one-sided free speech as an unchallenged format. I felt like it would create a public division entrenched in their ideology with never hearing the other side. Silly of me, I guess, because you can't force people to accept the opposite viewpoint. But the one-sided method squelches any chance of civil debate and differences because it intentionally limits information.
If voters let this happen we are on the way to a one party country - governing over anything standing in their way of power
We are right on the edge. The WEF, WHO, and many other entities and individuals have been systematically dismantling our rights. They're not even trying to hide it anymore.
All traitors will be dealt with
You license every reporter who is reporting the news, after they publish 3 confirmed lies they loose their license for life. Anyone has to list any reporting clearly as opinion but you hold them all accountable.
good job
Even the grim reaper don't want to be around him
It’s simple any company calling itself a News network that discuss politics and people’s well being will be responsible for telling the truth and is required to show proof like in court and if they fail the owner will have to pay a hefty fine and serve potential prison sentences.
That's the argument he's genuinely trying to make but it has nothing to do with the 1st. that's more of a societal issue, why do humans want to control information so badly?
Disinformation can, absolutely, destroy societies. We've seen it, from Hitler to Pol Pot. I would argue we are witnessing it here today.
I just can't think of a solution without studying the matter but elites aren't trying to solve this problem. They just want us to consume their lies.
Yale-boy speaks!
The first amendment is the reason he can speak rn.
Contradicted himself and then went public with the contradiction?
What fool.
Bro deserves every smear meme coming to him🤣
Yes the source ( the medias) is sick.
Go John. you must be having those Laos flashbacks
Yes stupid people get fooled. Poor leaders get scooped by better ideas.
Even her framing in this report was disingenuous, trying to make this a partisan issue. That can be considered disinformation but so what? Leave speech alone; people need to educate themselves.
The guy that was outsmarted by George W Bush
Is he trying to be relevant and get rich like he did off the NEW GREEN issue?
So, who controls what facts. Who will be the arbiter of truth. You?
I bet Xi or Kim don't have that peoblem.
Was Kerry referencing CNN or MSNBC? What needs to be looked into is how AOC is how able to garner votes.
Impeding his right to make up nonsense about climate change.
Go home and hug your purple heart....
My favorite bartender is pretty,, but vapid
Yikes
The usual Democrat playlist. Accuse the other side of what you're actually doing. IN this case: Be a threat to democracy.
kerry still thinks his purple heart is real..
#whatadouche
Please know ur the bad guy when you saying a right someone has is in your way..... Talk about evil.
John Kerry
Yes. You spelled his name correctly. BRILLIANT.
Ex senator kerry
Community notes, news aggregators, and and links to information on sources are how you combat disinformation
whose truth ?
demo everything crats ?
SCOTUS Justice Antonin Scalia said that lying is protected by the first amendment. I don't have a law degree, but he was wrong.