Breaking Down Russia’s Vacuum Bomb, the U.S.'s M10 Booker and More | WSJ Equipped

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 1.1K

  • @wsj
    @wsj  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +75

    Watch the latest episode of equipped on the six-bladed “knife-bomb” that is revolutionizing precision warfare: on.wsj.com/4bROkrh

    • @gaara-0172
      @gaara-0172 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Produce more long format videos

    • @IamAWESOME3980
      @IamAWESOME3980 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ah, american military drones, made in china no doubt

    • @YahWay.
      @YahWay. 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@IamAWESOME3980no, we got rid of Donald Trump so there's no more Sweet deals for China. No more Trump begging that block Chinese companies be unblocked
      And what was it, $70 million of interest income he declared in China?. Finally producing our own microprocessors in America, very little chance of what you're saying happening now. Thank God

    • @garrettfulks2932
      @garrettfulks2932 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@IamAWESOME3980 American military drones aren’t made in China.

    • @micahd1377
      @micahd1377 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why does the US support Israel so much? Because Wall Street Journal and other presstitutes take their marching orders from the disgraceful Murdoch family.

  • @kathyabrahams9766
    @kathyabrahams9766 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Man killing man. Such a tragedy almost unbelievable 😢😢😢

  • @KuLpApA
    @KuLpApA 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    That is the longest advertisement I have ever watched...

    • @danquarterman
      @danquarterman 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Get Oprah browser.
      :) You're welcome.

  • @Nomad_TraderX
    @Nomad_TraderX 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +161

    I love watching videos on the rich people's network showing me where my tax dollars go and what they do with the money they consistently inflate out of my meager savings via deficit spending (a not so hidden tax). At least WSJ is honest - war is about money and they cover money stories so it's very appropriate they are the leaders in this reporting genre 💰

    • @wew5499
      @wew5499 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Well said thx you

    • @LukeMahan-xr4xx
      @LukeMahan-xr4xx 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      War is a racket

    • @Nomad_TraderX
      @Nomad_TraderX 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@LukeMahan-xr4xx I recommend the book!

    • @aldrinmilespartosa1578
      @aldrinmilespartosa1578 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Poeple can't grasp larger things. Peace has a price on its own.

    • @Funko777
      @Funko777 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@aldrinmilespartosa1578 true, no one wants to fight America so that's pretty worth it. Plus if a more expensive piece of equipment can save the lives of soldiers then it's obviously worth it....also people vastly overestimate the value of our collective taxes. Most defense spending isn't coming from personal taxes.

  • @joshuaschmude7187
    @joshuaschmude7187 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    So many people totally underestimate what our armed forces are really capable of. Millions of underwater autonomous drones, all with missles that can be fired at the flip of a switch. Badass.

  • @rogeronealjr8051
    @rogeronealjr8051 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    How about self destruction abilities so the enemy doesn't have our technology?

    • @GrandALD.70s
      @GrandALD.70s 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      what technology bro ?? wake up sir ,,until today date and this moment at NOW ,USA and its allies plus Euro western Countries until this moment couldn't reach hypervelocity with huge failure on hypersonic projectiles projects which Russia advanced by far , Chinese Space science , and Iran drones, ballistic vehicles and aerodynamics.
      wake up Sir, u r very late this time of history that u r well know industrial manufacturing methods on very nice looking & most expensive just like those Sea Drones study took years and cost billions over became the nice looking solar panels fitted on most expensive non-advanced controlling board that loosing sat signal beside US's navy still recovering those drones without its original installed cameras which stolen by Iranian's IRG after hijacked them from Pers gulf and red sea shows u that IRGC wasn't interested with drones technology it appears they interested more with its cameras and recordings 😂
      lol

    • @danquarterman
      @danquarterman 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ;) that would be intolerably un-capitalistic. How dare you...

    • @luckyguy600
      @luckyguy600 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ooops too late.

    • @carlosaaronfigueroapalacio5333
      @carlosaaronfigueroapalacio5333 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Very problematic I'd say, that even could not guarantee the enemy not knowing your stuff. No worth the effort, I guess that's the reason nobody have done such.

  • @RichardL.1453
    @RichardL.1453 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    I'm suprised I haven't seen a drone shaped like a shark with movable fins.

    • @mattk8810
      @mattk8810 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Lol. Those exist

    • @bola0909
      @bola0909 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Stay tuned!

    • @robertplatte5700
      @robertplatte5700 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      they have been around for years the 1970's at least there was a movie made it was called JAWS

    • @lcfflc3887
      @lcfflc3887 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      DARPA is listening.

    • @lmcsquaredgreendale3223
      @lmcsquaredgreendale3223 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@mattk8810 I looked them up and this is what I got, Ghost Shark and Manta Ray are the names of prototype uncrewed underwater vehicles - UUVs or drones - introduced recently by Australia and the United States respectively. I'm digging deeper because I want to see one or both of these in their own environment. Thanks for the tip.

  • @bartofilms
    @bartofilms 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +117

    $2M for a 15' drone? Is a hammer still costibg the US Taxpayer $2000?.

    • @KILLKING110
      @KILLKING110 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      The drone has latest generation technology welcome to the world of cutting edge technology where if you fall behind you will die

    • @gullybull5568
      @gullybull5568 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      ​@@KILLKING110 sure sure. 😢😢

    • @mrt2this607
      @mrt2this607 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      His response was rather Pathetic and also extremely Typical for gov contracting, "well it's not too expensive, so if we lose some the Taxpayers can eat the cost". $2million for the drone, $2k for the hammer, and $800 for each individual screw holding it together. Showing once again, that these institutions need to be flattened and most top people fired. Or they'll happily continue billing the taxpayers and padding their own paychecks as always. Ridiculous amounts of money for the tools, materials, products, Thousands of foriegn places, wars and just about ANY organization involved or asking for $$$......and MAYBE if you're really lucky, there'll be some change left over for Americans and their retirement accounts. Upon being born every person is handed a large bottle of lube, so the gov can continue screwing them into Oblivion.

    • @abdouj7116
      @abdouj7116 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@KILLKING110you maybe over stretching it a bit."

    • @potatoish629
      @potatoish629 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@mrt2this607 do you have any idea how expensive it is to build and dev this stuff? Come back and speak once you have worked in the industry.

  • @stevenphillips3466
    @stevenphillips3466 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    Every government contract for planes or Missiles ...Go with the original budget and multiple it by 2.5 times ..... That will be the true budget

    • @gangoffour6690
      @gangoffour6690 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The military industrial complex being the benefactor of this expense to the U.S. taxpayer. In actuality the U.S. is spending money we print out of thin air.

    • @luckyguy600
      @luckyguy600 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ++ lol

  • @brotherbrovet1881
    @brotherbrovet1881 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

    Almost $10k for a standard 155mm shell??? "$2-3 million is the sweet spot." ??? I retired from a manufacturing executive career. "Sweet spot" = It matches our capabilites at a high profit margin, while being priced so the customer doesn't notice. That phrase says it all.
    I'm reminded of the last years of WWII. Germany put its faith in "wonder weapons ", while the Russians just kept producing artillery and tank shells and grinding up the Divisions of Germans and their allies, like the Ukrainian Banderites.
    Anyone else see this?

    • @numbersletters3886
      @numbersletters3886 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      100%, and yes we are the baddies……. People believe because Russia spends 1/4 on defense they are not equals, it’s how much more per dollar they get!! And the focus on what works…..

    • @Davitofrito
      @Davitofrito 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Given what we push socially and how our people are suffering ever declining living standards, this checks out. The elites don't care nor does the media. The high point of our country is choosing which elites sell us out. Both parties run up the debt. All the politicians appear to be geriatric. We risk ww3 over a corrupt foreign land because our government wants to run the world like an empire.
      We tell ourselves it's doe democracy and we are the good guys but the average person is ignorant of our government overthrow of democratic government of Pakistan.
      How elites look down on their citizens during recent historical events yet somehow still say it's the Russians, Chinese or Iranians that are the threat is beyond me.
      If our government nationalizes arms production, these grossly corrupt and inflated budgets would go away. One would hope.

    • @Cyd99
      @Cyd99 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I guess they didn’t do any R&D where you worked lol

    • @FrequencyOfThought
      @FrequencyOfThought 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's what this entire war is about milking U.S. tax payers and the MIC industries and its counterparts and insiders fill their pockets.
      It's bull, all these people cheering on Ukraine have no idea what they are cheering for. It's pointless...

    • @mrt2this607
      @mrt2this607 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Guy's basically saying- if the boat-drones get stolen it's no problem, because it's not it the typical Hundreds of Millions, so we've no concern that these losses can't be absorbed by the American Tax-Payers. Says nothing towards potential enemies then using it against us or copying the tech like a country such as chyna/russia. Why not incorporate a self-destruction countdown after a very loud siren followed by five, four, three, two, one...BOOM!. Put a couple multi-language warnings on it saying if you steal this, it goes Boom, taking anyone/anything in 30foot radius with it to the bottom of the ocean. Be somewhat hilarious to see so pirates try and take, then their facial expressions change as they read it, then the siren and countdown....humorous no? Make Actions having Consequences Great Again.

  • @exeternewengland671
    @exeternewengland671 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    $2~$3m per small remotely boat? No wonder how easy it is to steal the bank this day.

    • @EnjoiCircask8
      @EnjoiCircask8 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not so much when you consider that 2 million is 0.0001% of the yearly defense budget.

    • @barneyklingenberg4078
      @barneyklingenberg4078 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@EnjoiCircask8 An Ukraine suicide drone boat. Used to sink russian naval ships. (Magura V5)
      Costs 270k. So you can potentially sink 8 ships with those at the same cost of taking pictures with an american one.
      And China/Iran can probably make twice as many for half the money. Since both of them are specialized in drones.

    • @dannydetonator
      @dannydetonator 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @barneyklingenberg4078
      While this is mostly true (latest price for Sea Baby i've seen is 250K), these are nowhere near equal. Multi-role reconassaince sea drones with just optional added attack and permanent submarine capabilities, besides being autonomous and solar-poered are unprecedented. Completely different fish with different and wide roles, so for initial US price i'd say it's more than reasonable, if they do the claimed jobs. Note that planned wartime economies and centrally enforced MIC in autocracies like China, Iran, Russia, N. Korea etc. are bond to be an order of magnitude cheaper per unit (while still wasting billions on corrupted and failed propaganda projects though). Ukraine is an unique case, where free market and MIC is stretched to maximum and does not exactly follow the western profit rules, with mixed costs (materials and imported parts are not as cheap as their adversaries, while wages are now lower, which was other way round before the full-scale war). Ukrainian designed or adapted single-purpose weapons are better value in given circumstances, but you're comparing apples to orangutans here.

    • @urbanplanner7200
      @urbanplanner7200 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The US government is paying over $150 each for wooden pallets.

    • @brotherbrovet1881
      @brotherbrovet1881 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I'm reminded of the last years of WWII. Germany put its faith "wonder weapons ", while the Russians just kept producing artillery and tank shells and grinding up their armies.
      Anyone else see this?

  • @BoxheadHakx
    @BoxheadHakx 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    When the WSJ is posting videos about military weapons, understand that both parties know exactly what's coming up next.

    • @yougetaspear7799
      @yougetaspear7799 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's been nothing but blood money anyways I wonder why black amerikkka is silent instead of waiting till the last minute to eat anything they can from across the train tracks

  • @twobucca
    @twobucca 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The Booker looking like drone catnip, lol.

  • @wew5499
    @wew5499 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    All of these combatants will become exhausted to the point of just fading

    • @SkyRiver1
      @SkyRiver1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Sure: just like has never happened before.

    • @bunsw2070
      @bunsw2070 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      WSJ said a year ago that Russia had run out of ammunition and had resorted to using shovels. Then they said they'd run out of shovels and resorted to using their own boots. Prior to that they said a Ukrainian grandma had shot down a Kinzhal with a jar of pickles. And these are the people selling us global warming, green energy, experimental gene therapies and wars everywhere. And most people notice nothing.

  • @sofakingjewish
    @sofakingjewish 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +92

    a limerick.
    A stealthy boat called the Triton
    Could sail and submerge like Poseidon.
    Though cheap to attrit,
    Its sensors were lit,
    Giving intel that sailors would write on.

    • @Rob_F8F
      @Rob_F8F 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Triton is a reusable ISAR platform that costs the same as a one-use cruise missile, that's a bargain.

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      There once was boat from Kilkenny
      That could run underwater like a blenny
      Now this boat wasn't cheap
      Its price was quite steep
      But it could sink Russian boats aplenty.

    • @topiasr628
      @topiasr628 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Proving options for soldiers to fight on

    • @BorisPerc
      @BorisPerc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Poseidon is nuclear powered and have nuclear warhead dron that can dive all the world until the target is thermonuclearized.

    • @topiasr628
      @topiasr628 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @BorisPerc I know you're proud of it but it's a fantasy... Just like the Ruskie Mir and the fantasy of the "unstoppable Russian military" (see profile picture for how well those have turned out)

  • @seungltd
    @seungltd 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    This is just what they want you to see. Wonder how far classified technology has gone nowadays

    • @Biker65
      @Biker65 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Let's hope far.

    • @churblefurbles
      @churblefurbles 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@Biker65 Competency crisis would say otherwise.

    • @Biker65
      @Biker65 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@churblefurbles You know nothing.

    • @Kodakcompactdisc
      @Kodakcompactdisc 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Biker65 he thinks he’s John snow

    • @Biker65
      @Biker65 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Kodakcompactdisc "You know nothing John Snow''

  • @Steve33-c4o
    @Steve33-c4o 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Awesome investments for the US and NATO!

  • @IanSinclair77
    @IanSinclair77 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    It's interesting, but there is so much sales language in here that I expect the script was modified and approved by marketing from the companies.
    There is a lot of...not technically wrong, but objectove/misleading stuff...good, but...too much corporate sales language

    • @borninussr5615
      @borninussr5615 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Very much spot on, it is a profit driven industry. "Oh it is so cheap, it cost only 2-3 gazzillion dollars, oh no problem we just print more money". Well, good luck with that 🤡🤡🤡

    • @henryksienkiewicz9464
      @henryksienkiewicz9464 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ....evil language! Not sales.

    • @erikahl7180
      @erikahl7180 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Agreed.
      A lot of things are misleading, like the talk of thermobarics, we have thermobaric handgrenades its not that special. Or how ukranian helicopters had soviet dumb rocket that work just like the hydra rockets but the "expert" acts like area of effect is a new capability.
      And most of the video was not about the title just US MIC sales propaganda.

    • @gangoffour6690
      @gangoffour6690 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's not like the Ukraine is buying weaponry from the U.S. but the U.S. is just continuing the military action we started in 2014. There are few if any Ukrainian fighting age men left alive.

    • @RomanGolubev_A
      @RomanGolubev_A 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@borninussr5615 show us an industry that's not profit-driven

  • @mikeforce5926
    @mikeforce5926 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is the best documentry video I have ever watched

  • @cordellmohawk8408
    @cordellmohawk8408 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    War is not meant to be won it is meant to be Continuous

  • @devenbergeron155
    @devenbergeron155 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This series is great! I’m hooked

  • @teashea1
    @teashea1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    very well done

  • @retest6658
    @retest6658 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    So, Booker tank is the newer kind of Sherman tank?

  • @Lopro94
    @Lopro94 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    What comfortable times for weapons manufacturers 💩

    • @LOLONO666
      @LOLONO666 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      it's been like this before the war

    • @AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg
      @AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Invest in 155's

    • @luckyguy600
      @luckyguy600 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "How Sweet It Is" The Jackie Gleason Show

  • @clydelouis5956
    @clydelouis5956 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    There still stuck on stupid because the reason why drones are so much better is because how cheap they are. 10k for enemy drones vs Valkry at 5 to 10 million.

    • @RogerK9883
      @RogerK9883 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      They're

  • @dr.flywheel5493
    @dr.flywheel5493 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    Surprise, surprise, even WSJ falls for BS regarding a "Ninja Bomb", more than likely based not on rational and vetted facts but instead on rumors that originated with "video game warriors.". The actual weapon is a very small TBX warhead placed inside a mostly empty, AGM-114 ("hellfire") type air-frame. The missile was modified specifically to lower the cost of the original AGM-114 (which was meant to be used against tanks and heavily armored targets) while also significantly reducing "collateral damage", when used for "targeted individual personnel" (i.e. targeted assassination). due to the much lighter warhead, the missile's center of gravity as well as center of dynamic stability changed, requiring an aerodynamic stabilization solution, in the form of the six expandable knife-like wings protruding from the missile body frontal section. The "Ninja Myth" is nothing but stupid conjecture information proliferated on the Internet by substandard "drone journalists"...

    • @Trump2024asw
      @Trump2024asw 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Nice.

    • @piotrd.4850
      @piotrd.4850 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, and just sooo hapens that this 'aerodynamic stabilization solution' has terrific secondary use :D Because using e.g. steel ballast would be to difficult :D

  • @Heyguesswhutt
    @Heyguesswhutt 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    My grandma used to live by a missile testing sight in Marin California. She said she could see them testing the rockets right above the ground and putting them back.

  • @AddieHilton
    @AddieHilton 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    The US has been using thermobaric weapons since the Vietnam War.
    In recent years they have conveniently renamed them as "novel explosive" to avoid bad PR.
    Hundreds of thermobaric Hellfire missiles have been used in Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria - often in urban areas with little regard for civilian casualties.

    • @stephenkevindoss1474
      @stephenkevindoss1474 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      and i love how they accuse russia of attacking cities or “urban areas “ with out names of the cities. i was waiting for this bit of propaganda.

    • @Locuste
      @Locuste 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      video orlink of the proof is require or your words will vanished

    • @forfun6273
      @forfun6273 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who cares.

    • @denniscrork318
      @denniscrork318 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And, we're the 'good guys'? 😂😊

    • @AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg
      @AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "unloved" life forms

  • @FredCarver-zz4ib
    @FredCarver-zz4ib 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It is so good to see a topic, or croup of topics done so well and in depth. The work is displayed well and explained well. It presents the topic well enough to see its benefits and the possible dangers of the system, Well done and I look forward to the next video.

  • @jamesbrill7318
    @jamesbrill7318 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Imagine how education in the U.S. could be improved if they put a tenth of what they use for weapons production into improving learning.

  • @RickysRcChannel
    @RickysRcChannel 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I am a drone pilot and retired chef, if you can get me out there, I'll do what's needed.

  • @picaresqueatheist
    @picaresqueatheist 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    America will never admit it's losing a war

    • @captsirl
      @captsirl 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      True.

    • @PAMELAPORTER-ci7mr
      @PAMELAPORTER-ci7mr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      We have. We lost Vietnam.

    • @AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg
      @AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      America will keep helping Ukraine unalive Russian life forms.

  • @stevengill1736
    @stevengill1736 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That Triton, if equipped properly, could be an excellent tool for oceanographic research! It could observe marine mammals, track birds, and observe physical parameters like currents, water temperature, etc. I can't wait to see what marine biologists do with this!

    • @Mr_MikeB
      @Mr_MikeB 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Doubt marine biologists can afford to pay 2-3m per piece....

  • @danny208YT
    @danny208YT 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    My type of journalism. Good video

    • @Kodakcompactdisc
      @Kodakcompactdisc 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I also enjoyed it

    • @csonracsonra9962
      @csonracsonra9962 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      33:38 It was pretty good but they straight b******* at us about the 155 production because guess what during World War One and World War II we were out producing today's numbers by an order of magnitude but we didn't have any CNC machines back then.... they're simply bullshiting people

    • @justatiger6268
      @justatiger6268 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You like war propaganda?

    • @TheBucketSkill
      @TheBucketSkill 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@justatiger6268 unironically yea.

  • @hesimplywillnotdie
    @hesimplywillnotdie 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Really enjoy this type of informative content 👍

  • @Paul-yh8km
    @Paul-yh8km 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    In the time it allegedly takes to build one factory to make a few 155mm shells today, WWII would be half way through and multiple factories would have been built in months producing 100s of times more shells of different calibres.

    • @a0flj0
      @a0flj0 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Technology has changed significantly since WW2. WW2 was about mass production, but not very high tech. This translated to a similar situation on the battlefield - large masses of soldiers, lots of deaths. Nowadays, especially in the West, the strategy has shifted towards fewer - much fewer - weapons systems, but highly specialized and extremely advanced technologically. This shapes the battlefields similarly - far fewer deaths.
      In WW2, you were sometimes sending out two dozen bombers to drop literally tens of tons of shells over a rather large area to destroy one single factory, and still not damage the target significantly. Nowadays, you send out a single missile, and in 99 cases out of 100 you completely obliterate the target. Overall, although individual weapons are orders of magnitude more expensive nowadays than they were in WW2, war overall is cheaper, especially in terms of human deaths.

    • @Paul-yh8km
      @Paul-yh8km 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      @@a0flj0
      That was all fine until just over two years ago. Maybe watch the video before replying next time.

    • @SkyRiver1
      @SkyRiver1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What took a thousand bombs to hit in WW2, took a hundred bombs during Vietnam, took one bomb during Desert Storm. Basically the same with dumb shells, verses the rocket assisted guided 155 excalibur shells of today. Then their are so called drones which may make it all meaningless when swarms of insect sized drones assault an area, each one directed in real time by a hive mind connected to an AI central control, to kill any living heat source, like a cloud of death.

    • @khan-cricket
      @khan-cricket 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      @@a0flj0 1 precision bomb won't kill 3 seperate targets at the same time. That doctrine is outdated as only for small scale conflict.
      Number still matter, you can't end the war if you can only shoot 1 and enemy shoot 100. That is what happening in Ukraine

    • @shnitzilhazel9957
      @shnitzilhazel9957 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We're is a peacetime economy, before the US even begun fighting, it was gearing up for war for years.

  • @benabka
    @benabka 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    2 TO 3MILLS FOR A PLASTIC RC toy boat while other countries prioritize quantities and affordability... The MIC is ruining the USA.

    • @navyseal1689
      @navyseal1689 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lol get scammed

  • @dirkaminimo4836
    @dirkaminimo4836 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    How are the Houthi launching cruise missiles while keeping the range advantageous? Not from planes me thinks….

    • @AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg
      @AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      From ship I'd think

    • @dirkaminimo4836
      @dirkaminimo4836 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg I found out that they use large rocket boosters and a ramp. All from Iran.

  • @2muaddib
    @2muaddib 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Funny, but you, guys, completely forgot about new TOS-2, that fires rockets x3 further (~18 km) and is already out there.

  • @bartojoh
    @bartojoh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    at 2:49 "tantamount" - I think he means "paramount"

    • @colten1825
      @colten1825 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      most literate youtube commenter

  • @MikeWoot-ox9xf
    @MikeWoot-ox9xf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    38:46 🤔
    We can really just tell it to penetrate for a lil while…
    and then explode.
    Awesome updates for old technology
    like me.

  • @dreb222
    @dreb222 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Upgraded Bradleys supporting Bookers, supported by Abrams. That is one hellova force to be reckoned with.

  • @pikminlord343
    @pikminlord343 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great bideo

  • @joshuastanton6731
    @joshuastanton6731 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    The Booker, sounds like it will be destroyed immediately with modern drone warfare.

    • @dillonwest4236
      @dillonwest4236 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Agreed! Small cheap drones are changing the modern battlefield. Add a RPG round to one and your effective

    • @AbuHajarAlBugatti
      @AbuHajarAlBugatti 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Same weight as t90 which has 125mm calibre, automatic loader 3 crew system and atcive protection system. What a junk tank the booker is lol. I dunno who came up with that tank but he should be fired

    • @AbuHajarAlBugatti
      @AbuHajarAlBugatti 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dillonwest4236
      You dont understand how war works so keep it shut. Aerial drones cant occuoy and hold territory and cant destroy fortifications, bunkers or trenches and are useless in proper urban operations

    • @robertbates6057
      @robertbates6057 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@AbuHajarAlBugatti It's for the Airborne units only.

    • @JamesGrim08
      @JamesGrim08 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AbuHajarAlBugatti Exactly, and as the comment below this said, building these was for their airdrop capability. The Abrams recently got an upgrade and I dont see that MBT line going away. One huge thing they are working on is a reliable counter drone jamming, so we will see where that leads in the next year.

  • @michaellynch1132
    @michaellynch1132 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    the cost of a Ukrainian sea drone = $10K-15K. Cost of a US sea drone 2-3 million $. Oh joy...

  • @AndreaDoesYoga
    @AndreaDoesYoga 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Wow, this insight into war tech is eye-opening 🌐

    • @Av-vd3wk
      @Av-vd3wk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Um…this is an hour and 14 minute video and you posted this comment 2 minutes after it was uploaded.

    • @teeboogie3237
      @teeboogie3237 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Av-vd3wk to plays devil's advocate, they could have watched it at like 10x speed lol....
      Its a bot

    • @touchofgrey5372
      @touchofgrey5372 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Colombian - Japanese ??? Yep, that was eye-opening!

    • @jaypaige7550
      @jaypaige7550 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@teeboogie3237 Or a member, members get to watch earlier.

    • @douggoldstein2433
      @douggoldstein2433 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nice yoga

  • @Steve33-c4o
    @Steve33-c4o 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great reporting thanks for sharing!❤❤❤❤❤

  • @blaiseutube
    @blaiseutube 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    It would be awesome to see a similar video on breakthroughs of educational technology to see how we're preparing kids to make good use of this destructive tech.

    • @henryksienkiewicz9464
      @henryksienkiewicz9464 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Read and watch Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt "Damming Down of America"

    • @robertplatte5700
      @robertplatte5700 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      HAHAHAHAHA onya brother sarcasm at its finest, but you do have a very good point

  • @TB7-X
    @TB7-X 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Warfare has gotten wicked quickly.

  • @kabelolitheko
    @kabelolitheko 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Ai is going to be the death of humanity 😭😭😭😭

    • @80proteinbonny
      @80proteinbonny 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It wont ... individuals like You will help about "arteficial" ... whether like or not ... that could be problematic there goes explination that you should confront .... Go Try That :))))

    • @kabelolitheko
      @kabelolitheko 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@80proteinbonny let’s learn to gather our thoughts and write them down first. Then we can talk, how about that?

  • @jeanmarcgomez1630
    @jeanmarcgomez1630 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    After the Russian’s washing machine chips , here are the US ´s wacum cleaner ! 😂😂

  • @kevinc1200
    @kevinc1200 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    A Triton is the same cost as Tomahawk? That’s way too high.

    • @charlesyoung3444
      @charlesyoung3444 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Bro it's a solar autonomous submarine that's small, it has incredible potential

    • @UnCannyValley67
      @UnCannyValley67 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Mother effer is a sailboat AND a submarine, and its solar and autonomous AND can be self sufficient for 3 months at a time.

    • @debaterofeverythingpresent2775
      @debaterofeverythingpresent2775 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Before you say the Triton is too expensive, consider the costs, it requires a dozen bag of bushings worth 90 thousand dollars and comes fitted with that state of the art 10k toilet seat.

    • @Benson_aka_devils_advocate_88
      @Benson_aka_devils_advocate_88 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It ain't no rc sailboat that grandpa totes around the lake.

    • @pogo1140
      @pogo1140 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@debaterofeverythingpresent2775 triton does not have a toilet

  • @StoccTube
    @StoccTube 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In WW2 they would’ve classes the Booker as an “Infantry tank”.

  • @nicolasolton
    @nicolasolton 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    USA should probably focus more on electronic warfare and drone defense.

    • @farthammer7126
      @farthammer7126 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      and active protection

    • @elijah_9392
      @elijah_9392 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Look into the AN/APG-85, and "Nixie" torpedo decoy systems. The US also has pods that can be attached to aircraft to add jamming capability.
      I am not sure about drone defense.

    • @UnCannyValley67
      @UnCannyValley67 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Ok, General. 😅

    • @1ntwndrboy198
      @1ntwndrboy198 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Imagine though a million drones coming at you 😮😱

    • @oneshothunter9877
      @oneshothunter9877 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bryanx590
      You can do these simultaneously.
      Just tax the rich, make them pay their fair share.

  • @Steve33-c4o
    @Steve33-c4o 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    There’s no price on freedom 🚀🚀🚀🚀

    • @mcrick8931
      @mcrick8931 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      LOL

  • @JRPGGUY
    @JRPGGUY 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    I want to see more of th m10 booker

    • @wew5499
      @wew5499 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Where would you like to see that? 😂

    • @connormcintosh4828
      @connormcintosh4828 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A gentleman's club that hires exclusively "the newest and naughtiest IFVs in the country!"​@@wew5499

    • @001vern
      @001vern 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      After seeing what is happening in the Ukraine I don't think the M10 Booker would last very long on the modern battlefield. More armor, and/or better defensive weapons against ultralight drones are needed to survive today.

    • @garrettfulks2932
      @garrettfulks2932 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@001vern The reason that Russia and Ukraine have been losing a very large amount of equipment to drones is because they lack any defense systems against small UAVs and neither side has air superiority. The U.S. currently has anti UAV weapons at its disposal and is currently producing many of them to use so it would be different circumstances.

    • @voldemarvaglaots6690
      @voldemarvaglaots6690 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@garrettfulks2932, losses are calculated in MS Excel...

  • @lettermaniac1
    @lettermaniac1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Were excited to see the "BOOKER" on the battlefield. Totally, a "game-changer" for the US Army.
    The Philippines 🇵🇭 government is actually making a feasibility study to buy at least 200 of this tank in the next 6 years.

  • @peripheral1258
    @peripheral1258 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Letmegetthisright. Russia fires 20-30,000 shells Per Day and the US went into this mess producing only 14,000 shells per Month ? Half a day's supply. And it will only reach a three day supply/Month in Two Years ( while Russia will again have increased its production over that time).
    Meanwhile the Ukrainian ground forces advance WW1 style into this baffling barrage WITH NO AIR SUPPORT. 47:00 Humanitary Concerns ? Lets give Ukr. Cluster Munitions that drop indiscriminate landmines covering Donbas. eg: "Some 4 million to 6 million land mines and other unexploded munitions are estimated to have littered Cambodia's countryside"
    WSJ: Where is your Adult Assessment of the current US Administration ?

    • @efghggdxlmfn33
      @efghggdxlmfn33 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Adult eating chocolate chip ice cream. Near the red button

  • @mcrick8931
    @mcrick8931 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    This is why anyone not living in a tent now will be in the future 😎 costly to be first

  • @PeterR0035
    @PeterR0035 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Technically interesting, emotionally scary 😨

  • @joeschmooz-it6nh
    @joeschmooz-it6nh 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This has the same Armaments as the M60 MBT.

  • @DouglasHarper-cn4ur
    @DouglasHarper-cn4ur 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Beautiful bud, what method were you using, couldn't tell by the video fly lure or bait?👍

  • @roderickflint1330
    @roderickflint1330 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Verry well done video. Easy to fallow

    • @jamesjross
      @jamesjross 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      full of BS- GLSDB don't work... these are old statements from US Gov. they have since acknowledged it was rushed into service untested. We need to do better.

  • @efghggdxlmfn33
    @efghggdxlmfn33 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yemen in 3 days? The United States spent a billion dollars on the combat operations of its aircraft carrier squadron in the Red Sea, but lost the naval war to the Yemeni Navy. The Houthis'
    success rate is relatively low given the
    number of munitions deployed, but they
    have succeeded it hitting around 30
    merchant ships.
    With traffic through the Red Sea having
    declined by about 60-70%, the inflationary
    impacts will be felt in the global economy.
    Western navies are really really concerned
    over the "high" number of munitions houthis
    use…especially when the western
    munitions in Cyprus are nearly exhausted
    after more than 6 months of trying to kill
    houthi children with multi million pound
    missiles.

  • @andylester4503
    @andylester4503 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    You know someone is getting ripped off when a shell costs more than a car engine

    • @dylannolan7454
      @dylannolan7454 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That someone is you (if you pay taxes)

  • @royevans4581
    @royevans4581 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    USA: Don't spend all that money updating those missiles. Just stop trying to effect regime change in foreign nations!

  • @richardcheese9429
    @richardcheese9429 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Basically, technology like drones, guided glide bombs, and constant surveillance capabilities means armour is useless now. It goes to show how hopeless it is for infantry and armoured personnel in a modern conflict. You are sitting ducks to people in computer rooms far away from the front lines. Nothing but meat shields.

    • @AbuHajarAlBugatti
      @AbuHajarAlBugatti 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You obviously have no idea about landwarfare. Yeah go let a fpv destroy fortifications, deep trenches, bunkers, hold ground, occupy land, act in urban warfare

    • @NotUnymous
      @NotUnymous 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      As one need to take ground and secure advanced positions, tanks and Infanterie are still most important. But yes, there job just got tougher

  • @craftsman40
    @craftsman40 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I could have sworn the Booker took a que from the T90.

  • @RuneRavn-vb3mt
    @RuneRavn-vb3mt 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I am surprised that Russians do not know that Tuborg beer is a known Danish brand which is owned by Carlsberg.

  • @TB7-X
    @TB7-X 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I assume we believe our adversaries already knows about this tech, otherwise why are we advertising it?

  • @NotASeriousMoose
    @NotASeriousMoose 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    This is more of an advert for defence contractors than anything else

    • @kenrdavis2266
      @kenrdavis2266 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No it’s not! Are you a troll or an adversary? Talk like that is insane.
      Maybe US 🇺🇸 should disband the Military? Borders are open and inflation is growing. Guess we need not attempt defense else Contractors are blamed for promoting War? PATHETIC!

  • @agungprasetyo2665
    @agungprasetyo2665 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The russian just made it from shovels and ics from used washing machine

  • @rickjames18
    @rickjames18 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The problem with GLSDB is that it was rushed into production and wasn't ready yet. Ukrainians have not used it much because they found that the Russians GPS jammers were taking it off course. They were missing and that is a problem. Russian EW is good despite having a horrible army in general.

    • @JohnDoe-iq9bz
      @JohnDoe-iq9bz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      'Horrible army'? 😂😂😂 Now if you said horrible logistics then you would have a point. Russia's army is one of its strongest points. It's crazy that they've used conscripts and felons who have taken multiple cities. 80% of their army is still in the mainland. But I get it, you're a Russophobe who has to say negative things about Russia to make yourself feel better😃 I mean they've ran out of weapons and they're now using shovels too right? If only they fought against Vietnamese rice farmers maybe they would've done better😂

    • @websitemartian
      @websitemartian 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      this war could EASILYbe ended.. but of course we have to continue blowing money we don't have..

  • @oromtichaoromia1265
    @oromtichaoromia1265 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Its one of advanced sciencetific Military war machine achievements like star war movie come to realty ❤❤❤😍

  • @Cryosxify
    @Cryosxify 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    If the triton take out ccp landing craft it could be pretty useful

    • @marcelocipriani308
      @marcelocipriani308 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's the plan in Taiwan. Flood the Ocean with drones similar to one's used by Ukrainians in the Black Sea.

  • @chasrmartel4777
    @chasrmartel4777 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why not use D5 on land? It can even be encapsulated in a sub tube and moved to different silos, maintenance yards and mobile deployment platforms.

  • @MinecraftRedOFFICAL
    @MinecraftRedOFFICAL 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Cool, 1 Hour of Taxpayer's Investment Presentation!

    • @UnCannyValley67
      @UnCannyValley67 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Maybe you’d rather try icing in china or Ruzzia..?

  • @IceBox666theone666
    @IceBox666theone666 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Regarding the booker Tank platform. Good idea compared with a Abrams but was not the STRIKER system invisioned to do that job what now is planed for the Booker? What happened to the STRIKER project?

  • @scarymonsterrs
    @scarymonsterrs 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    That's correct Iran, you get toy solar powered boats to combat your Navy 😂.

    • @floofy5529
      @floofy5529 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Iran’s entire navy was destroyed by the US after just 1 American ship was bombed. There’s nothing else to prove to them.

    • @jameslopez9661
      @jameslopez9661 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      One hole will sink you

    • @churblefurbles
      @churblefurbles 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@jameslopez9661 will neutralize carriers as well, and who relies on expensive platforms is the question.

    • @garrettfulks2932
      @garrettfulks2932 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@churblefurbles”Will neutralize carriers,” highly unlikely.

    • @Zedgo99
      @Zedgo99 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The MIC taking the concept of "cheap drones" and getting cost up to 3 million dollars is why the U.S. will get pantsed the moment it has to engage an actual peer in war lol.

  • @williamkholmes
    @williamkholmes 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When there is a new model order, I would hope allowance is made for in line first order improvements should such occur prior to completion of a first order. Seems to me, if significant, any feasible improvements should be added to the first model if caught in time; rather than simply waiting until the first order is finished as ordered. Seems wasteful to complete any order without known improvements being incorporated, just for the sake of preserving the completeness of the first, or any order. Rather, when a significant improvement can be added to the original order, simply negotiate the cost adjustment, add the improvement to the remain see of the first order, calling it a 10A. After that, pray tell, include those improvements and any subsequent others into a second model grouping for future orders.

  • @inzhener2007
    @inzhener2007 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    GLSDB missiles are counter measured by Russian jamming.

  • @everettputerbaugh3996
    @everettputerbaugh3996 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    To 'future proof' the hardwired interconnect, I suggest horizontal drilling, leaving an armor casing and running the fiber/copper, then pressurize the segments for fault detection. Upgrades simply require removal / replacement of the data links. (No more real estate issues.)

  • @DiMa-pb7gy
    @DiMa-pb7gy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Meanwhile, Russia is dominating the battlefield with shovels and washing machines....

    • @nicolasolton
      @nicolasolton 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ok.👍

    • @quill444
      @quill444 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      _Russia is now one twentieth of one percent larger than it was in 2022, and all it cost them is half a million lives, and the respect of most of the world._ 😨 ⚒ - j q t -

    • @DiMa-pb7gy
      @DiMa-pb7gy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@quill444 get your facts straight...

  • @walterrc4860
    @walterrc4860 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The fact that we now consider multi million dollar kit "attritable" is an insult to humanity!

  • @yourfather5093
    @yourfather5093 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    They say "counter adversaries" , but they just meddle around for decades so they are the "adversaries" everywhere...

  • @michaelandersonDTLA
    @michaelandersonDTLA 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    All the M-IC company reps look and sound like Don Draper.

  • @wew5499
    @wew5499 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Imagine the clean up after the 155.
    200,000 a month. JFC
    Hope for the planet is fading

    • @dirkaminimo4836
      @dirkaminimo4836 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Once production of weapons hit full stride in the US, Japan was swallowed whole. Question is just what it will take to wake the sleeping tiger! It’s ridiculous. Even when there is profit to be made this process can’t be moved to China. Greed tainted this system, but will also get it rolling.
      Ramjet shells sounds pretty cool…

  • @TT-dp8qh
    @TT-dp8qh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That unmanned could be a stealthy sub, and it is hard to be hunt!

    • @santoriniblue8413
      @santoriniblue8413 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A periscope or snorkel trail is very easily recognized from the air, it was exploited as far back as WWII. Nowadays with the quantity of sensors in the air, much more, especially with the sail deployed. Objects on the sea are more easily detected and tracked than on the ground, as the sea is very uniform in contrast to the different geographical accidents that land offers for concealment.

  • @stolly27
    @stolly27 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    3 to 4 million not expensive? what world is this guy living in?

  • @humungushumungus213
    @humungushumungus213 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am a disabled US Army Vet, there are a big number of us who live in poverty. Why not improve our lives? Why not take care of our own soldiers! In Roman times soldiers were given titles, land and gold, that empire lasted a thousand years. We are given a bag of 💩 😢

    • @humungushumungus213
      @humungushumungus213 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I am thankful for what I get, thank god for VA. It could be improved

  • @stop116
    @stop116 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    1. Russia is saying they will use nuclear weapons first if NATO countries attacks them directly
    2. Putin is scared of NATO conventional superiority
    3. Russia focuses more on Nukes
    Everyone knows - none of the sides wants to use nukes, because that exchange will kill all of us. Conventional weapons are defensive and offensive, while nukes are considered only as repellent (for enemy to think twice of gambling)
    Russia is showing weakness in conventional war and the West still call them aggressive? Conventional superiority is sign of aggression, while NUCLEAR THREAT is saying clear words - STEP BACK..

    • @yam2050
      @yam2050 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Normies don't want to use nukes but leaders don't give a f a out it, they have their multi-million bunkers that can keep them alive for years if not decades.

    • @JAllenKaiser
      @JAllenKaiser 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Good idea: Russian troops should step back into Russia. Claiming a neighboring country’s territory for your own is in no way “defensive.”

  • @andrewratshefola2438
    @andrewratshefola2438 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    An interesting indeth of technological knowledge!

  • @thebudman1980
    @thebudman1980 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    So in Ukraine the drone war is getting scary. The soldiers getting attacked by those drones don't always see them. Sometimes they go about their business and even looked right at the drone above there head and didn't even notice.
    Then when not having designated targets. They go out on hunts with drones 24x7. Day and night.
    Then the scary parts is seeing drones do circles soldiers trying to get away from and trying to hit with sticks.
    But the drone operator is toying with them because he could have already hit the button to kill him. Then goes in for the kill and target eliminated.
    Or other footage i seen where a guy hides from a drond behind a tree but doesn't see the drone behind him.
    Other things i seen on different media is how they also use land drones to go bomb them in foxholes or land drones to sometimes recover aircraft drones by hooking up and hauling them back.
    Ukraine is a lot more experienced with the smaller civilian sized drones for combat than we are. Then add Russia is always on the hunt for drones. You sometimes hear them but can't pinpoint exactly where they are and you hope they don't see you.
    Other things i seen is that sometimes when Ukraine launches drones into Russia then they get jammed. Keep going and then sometimes unjam after they are outside of jamming range and regain control.
    And if you see one drone there is usually several around.
    They fly in buildings with blown out windows or opened doors or blown out ealls and everything else to hit there targets such as men on foot.
    Oddly the drones have been fairly accurate and most of the time hitting their targets.
    I see at least one that managed to fly the drone in the tank hatch itself.
    I seen other footage where another drone swings around. Stops for a second then darts at a Russian tank and the turret blows off.
    Sometimes they are strapping old RPG style grenades to them for the tanks. Drone Still light enough to carry and blow up a Russian tank. They only need the explosive part of the rpg.
    When jammed they send more drones out while sitting in a bunker and keep trying. The video feed usually gets jammed first. They use one drone that not dji brand. That has the target tracking and stuff some consumer drones have. Usually they replace optics with better optics. Infrared or whatever.
    I been watching a lot of the journalist videos that came out recently.
    Like Darwin's war from scripps news. It's about Ukraine's ace fpv pilot. And several other journalist shows about drones on the front lines in Ukraine that all came out within the last month or 2.
    I forgot to add. When jammed they keep sending more out until successful. Then maybe the first few came up short but they only need one to make it to the target. So after a few drones or so they got the target despite the jamming.

    • @bikermaniac6002
      @bikermaniac6002 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Russia just developed a “shotgun” adapter to hunt for drones, very effective. Is like shooting a duck.

    • @musehtaicho
      @musehtaicho 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      >Oddly the drones have been fairly accurate and most of the time hitting their targets.
      Because you see only succesfull strikes? Even if 90 out of 100 are jammed/missed/downed you'll see 10 videos and say "wow, all of them reached targets".

  • @johannesfeigl5309
    @johannesfeigl5309 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ocean arrow shame that it is not configured for peaceful assignments😮

  • @eliyahudbenperetz1615
    @eliyahudbenperetz1615 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This is the same drone we see being tow by an Iranian small navy boat without nobody doing nothing about it.

  • @MedAventuras.
    @MedAventuras. 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    the Iskander missile that costs 3 million, awaits for you!

  • @AlexanderKunis
    @AlexanderKunis 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Such big muscles and such small faded brain that commands all this power.

  • @08yallvon
    @08yallvon 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Can the Trition escape fishermans net?

  • @vitalys9986
    @vitalys9986 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Why was US military drone operating near Iran? US is half of the world away.

    • @ekimstrongcup6029
      @ekimstrongcup6029 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Cause The US can be any where.

    • @JAllenKaiser
      @JAllenKaiser 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Protecting shipping from Somali pirates and Houthi rebels.

  • @jamielancaster01
    @jamielancaster01 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Remember, we’re sending Ukraine our old stuff and replacing that with new stuff to our own inventory.