The Ford Maverick and this vehicle show folks want vehicles like this. Since the Subaru's are built on their global platform, they need to bring back the Baja.
Car based utes were around before Subaru released the baja, and before that Subaru's own Brat. Remember the Ford Ranchero, and Chevrolet El Camino. Also Volkswagen sold a pickup version of the Rabbit in the 80's. But to Subaru's credit, their offerings were more off road focused/capable than this vehicle is. I think I saw a video on YT that indicated Subaru might be considering bringing the Baja back.
I love my 18-year-old Subaru Baja, but am in the market to replace it in 2025. I'm really hoping that a new Baja will come out with a hybrid option, as that would far and away almost certainly be my top choice over Hyundai, Ford, Honda, or a Toyota Stout (if that makes it to market).
I bought this vehicle yesterday and disagree with this reviewers negative opinions! I love the quietness and smooth driving of the Santa Cruz XRT. In my opinion, the Santa Cruz XRT is designed for those of us that want the feel and style of an SUV with some truck capabilities and not so much of the mud and off road pleasures. The 2025 model may come with updated technology, but I like the looks of the 2024 model.
I have this exact vehicle right down to the color. Generally agree with you except… I got mine for $38k when Ford dealerships were demanding $5k over msrp on Maverick. I got more for the money. 4x8 sheets sit nicely with the gate at the partial setting. I don’t agree with you that it drives tight. It’s a light duty truck. Carries tools and small equipment just fine. Bed lights are really nice. Has nice bed steps. Rear seat is for the dog. She loves the side steps for getting in and out. I use them too. Agree it’s not for off road.
Thanks for the review! I bought a 23’ SEL Premium and it’s been great as long as you understand what it is capable of handling. I appreciate that you got the silly XRT trim with the 18” wheels to show capability. Most reviewers only ever reviewed the Limited with larger wheels. I’m glad reviewers are finally addressing these sport and off-road packages that are nothing more than stickers and added weight without anything practical or useful. Speaking of the side steps, my previous truck was a loaded 11’ Ranger XLT and came with these steps and they were equally as useless. They did make it look cool or more like a big boy truck 😂
I think Hyundai was super smart for creating this model. Ford obviously showed that people want a smaller truck. A few things that bug me… the piano black just needs to go. Why do they (car companies) keep putting it in the interior. Second, I really can’t stand the gage cluster is rectangle behind a round steering wheel. So odd to me. The DCT isn’t a great choice for off roading so it’s interesting they went with that for this trim but I guess with this money people want the more powerful engine. Lastly a lot of people have mentioned this in the comments but the reliability would scare me to much. Yes they have a great warranty but I don’t want to have to rely on it.
So Hyundai’s “off road” package is basically aesthetic, but with lower ground clearance than the non off road Sante Fe. Oh those crazy marketing execs 😄
Ryan your review was top notch as usual! It would be awesome to see this type of test on the NA 2.5 with standard tranny and AWD. Just curious how well the AWD on the non DCTs handles the trail. Thanks for another awesome video!
I just don't understand why car companies make these off-road trims, claim the vehicle is off-road ready, yet don't increase ground clearance/ approach angle/ include all-terrain tires.
@@drivingsports the naturally aspirated version with the regular transmission without dct/dual glutch is better off road the all wheel drive system doesnt overheat as easy as the crappy dct.TFL STUDIOS had videos on it
It's because they use marketing to the average consumer to get them to think it can do all these things and it works. Especially because most people just want the look, so it's a good vehicle for them.
I mean subaru with the wilderness trims will increase ground clearance, at tires as standard and underbody protection with redesigned front and rear end for better approach angles which is.. drastically different from the other trims
Was looking at tremor on ford website and price was comparable with less features. Specifically no ventilated seat in maverick. That s/b standard on a vehicle as high trim as the lariat
Funny thing about the side steps. Yes they are dumb and my wife and I have to step over them, but I will say our toddler loves the step, so there's that, lol
Hey Ryan, great video, thanks. Do you have any information indicating why they went with a DCT wet clutch on this trim/motor? What are they trying to achieve with that vs. a standard auto?
The Santa Cruz with up to 5000 lb tow rating, does offer 1000 lbs more towing capacity than the Ford Maverick’s max 4000 lb tow rating, however the Santa Cruz doesn’t perform anything really great. For the price step up to a Ford Ranger with the FX4 package if one is planning to go off road and need the 5000+ lb towing rating, else go with the 2025 Ford Maverick Tremor package with its lower 2000 lb tow rating which out performs the Santa Cruz off road in all categories.
These sidesteps might be a good protection for doors and side sills. Ofc it depends on how rigid their points of attachment are but steel tubes gonna eat impacts with rough terrain better then plastic cladding.
You know, I think the Hyundai Santa Cruz cross over is excellent for what they were initially intended to be marketed for. But I like that Hyundai has answered the call for a more off-road oriented version with the XRT trim. People have actually built them into Over-land vehicles. So that just goes to show that a platform to work with is a platform to work with. The reason why I commented though was because the vehicle is actually being done a disservice by the testers turning traction control off. It will have the most capability when using the TPO lock mode if traction control is left on. With it off, it's more like 4wd with no lockers or limited slip diffs. The traction control works in place of limited slip diffs. Minute 15. If I were shopping for a cross over, the Santa Cruz would be on my list for considerations. It would work excellent for me and could even go further that what many people expect. I would like one for fishing or camping, also taking them to trail heads for Mountain biking, but they also have the nice utility for people that have homes. In America, many of us think that if you don't have a truck, when you purchase a home, it is the right time to have one. So, the Santa Cruz provides that utility.
12:40 this perfectly encapsulates my problems with the Santa Cruz and the Ridgeline. The appeal of these vehicles is the pragmatism of a pickup without the inherent issues of owning one.
You gave a good example of light off-roading that does tax the system quickly. The terrain is different around the country. I would like to see how it performs on sandy dunes, unimproved roads, or two-track trails. I would still consider this vehicle even though 90% of my time would be spent on pavement.
Side steps are not only to step in and out the car, if you were a surfer you would probably understand the use of them. I have the Tucson and I wish I had some steps when I’m using my cross bars.
Looks fine for maintained dirt roads, snow, and parking in muddy grass fields after a rainstorm. Pulling a boat off a slippery or rural boat launch, using forest roads, and using it on rough construction sites? Not so much. Not a fan of $40K cars having plastic park bench interiors.
I pre-ordered in '21 and have zero regrets. I did wait until Ford announced the Maverick to see how it stacked up. I mainly agree with you - if you want a small TRUCK, get the Maverick. If you mainly want/need an SUV but also need a truck bed now and then, like I did, the Cruz is more comfortable and way more fun to drive. Also, although subjective, the Hyundai just flat out looks better. The Maverick is just kind of inoffensive and boring. 3 years later, I still just like to stop and stare at my little trucklet. Also agree about the side steps being absolutely ridiculous on the Cruz and that the 18 inch wheels ride nicer. I have the 20s and bought 18s for my winter tires ... they are much smoother, but the 20s do handle a little crisper.
Anyone that off roads knows that those steps are the first thing you would remove if you actually used the truck. It's very obvious that it was added by the marketing team. People that like the idea of off road, but don't actually know anything about it.
Side steps are not only to step on the car, if you were a surfer you would probably understand the use of them. I have the Tucson and I wish I had some steps when I’m using my cross bars.
Thanks for this vid ! Was looking at trading my 24 awd equinox premier rs for one but looks like I got a better deal atm and thats sad because its and equinox haha.
Rock rails are typically bolted to a frame. If you try to use these as rock rails they will damage the body of the vehicle. These are absolutely just side steps and only provide an aesthetic.
Looking into this as a replacement for my Kia Stinger. My girlfriend says this is "not a truck" and i agree with her. That being said I justify it by saying its a "ute" an aussie term for car/truck hybrid like an el camino or a subaru baja
Toyota hasn't been Toyota since the pandemic. Remember when they announced they were lowering their quality standards due to parts shortages? I don't think they ever went back to kaizen. @@hooty465
If you're looking for a offroader hyundai probably isn't the first place you should look, subaru is the obvious first choice but this is a good start sinec jeep is flushing their reputation down the toilet
Love the thorough and honest review. *no sidesteps were harmed in the making of this 😂 For that price I'd definitely go with a Subaru Outback or Forester. There is just so much more in those for the money, AND they get the job done!
@BoopSnoot Subaru's Outback Wilderness, and even the 2024 Crosstrek Wilderness are serious forces to be reckoned with. Quite capable, and have a long proven history in the off road field.
And the Hyundai would eat the Mav alive at race track(on-road) lol this car isn't supposed to be an off-road vehicle. They have their own pros and cons. These are 2 vehicles in different categories.
@@anthonylim2428 But it doesn't. Thing is there are Mavericks already on racetracks. Autocross, drags, nurburgring even. We got Mavericks in the 11s in the quarter mile Ford parts and basic bolt ones. We got coilovers for track and trail from multiple companies.
@@RRr-yl8zr I had read in an article where a GM official stated that they would NOT be building a compact unibody truck for the American market because they feel it wouldn't serve the average American. According to gm of it's not body on frame then it doesn't count. If I can find the article I'll try and post it here
They have the Chevy Montana everyhwhere else. but upon my research looks like it's just to small and weak for the us/canada market. I don't understand why they don't make it the same size as the maverick with a stronger engine and sell it here?
Can’t believe this “off roader” has so poor ground clearance. Also the lack of an off road tire package. Hope next years model steps up as you mentioned. Thanks for the excellent review.
Not especially a professional review. This is a sports activity vehicle on a truck. I purchased a hitch mount bed extender for hauling sheets of anything. The Ford Maverick feels a lot less sophisticated but can't haul any better (subjectively). The Santa Cruz is significantly more modern than the competition. This review clearly starts off the trail.
No, they need to step up the clutches, otherwise it remains awd pavement queen, i beleive TFL had same experience, i actually wonder if Nathan is happy with his in this regard
Do some careful research on Hyundai/Kia, over 4 million defective engines and counting with current Class Action lawsuit in both CAN/USA. Literally every engine they’ve made is defective, except v6. My Sorento and wife’s Elantra…boom. You know the game “6 degrees of Kevin Bacon”, try asking people if they know anyone with defective Hyundai/Kia engine, it’s eye opening.
It's like the 2011s-2016s, you're usually good after 2018. Elantras are notoriously bad at reliability, engine and transmission problems. I have a 2018 with the 1.6 and I LOVEE the engine but the transmission.... It's a lot to be desired.
@@Lalaafastroliit’s totally a thing, have YOU done any research? My boss just bought a telluride and the trans blew up at 10k miles. I know tons of people that had engines blow on their Kia/Hyundais too.
I think the Santa Cruz is super sharp but the Interior is really disappointing. I've never driven a 2.5 so im curious about what you guys think? The 1.6 engine is the bessstttt but Kia/Hyundai transmissions are just so weird. Both my Soul and my gf's are TERRIBLE in stop and go traffic with the dual clutch and shiftronic transmissions. That being said, I probably wouldn't buy Kia/Hyundai ICE again /:
2025 gets a new interior. I've driven the 2.5. It has enough power, its direct and port injected so should stay clean of carbon, it seems reliable, its mated to an 8-speed torque converter instead of a DCT, it tows 3500lbs, but... its rated 24mpg combined, when for the exact same power output the hybrid in the Maverick will get you high 30s. Efficiency is its only real flaw. :(
None of this is true. Turbo engines have lower compression ratios to compensate for the turbo boost compared to higher compression ratio naturally aspirated engines, or they have variable compression ratios like on some Nissan turbos. Virtually all non-luxury turbocharged engines are designed to run on 87 octane, including this Hyundai. Most naturally aspirated engines are also direct injected for emissions/fuel economy reasons, but this Hyundai if you research is both direct and port injected to avoid carbon buildup. @@RRr-yl8zr
Its not a typo, you're on the internet google it, virtually all modern engines are direct injected. Some engines are direct AND port injected, it switches as needed to avoid carbon buildup while keeping fuel economy high and emissions low. @@RRr-yl8zr
@@RRr-yl8zr damn that's really good to know, both of my cars have turbos and I definitely put cheaper gas into them. We do maintain them really well, but anything I can do to create longevity, I'll do because you can't always trust other people to have your best interest in your car. I really like their 1.6 engines, BUT I have noticed rough starts with the Kona and it's a freakin 2021 model so there you go -____-
@@BoopSnoot I'd really like to test the 8 speed transmission on the highway and stop'n'go traffic. The DCT on my Kona is TERRIBLE in slow traffic, it shutters and jolts. It's a fun little car on hills and mountain roads and I love the little car, but idk that it's gonna last that long /: Good to know their 2.5 is better in reliability over time for sure!
Love the look of this vehicle trim from Hyundai, but I cannot get past those red center caps on the wheels. They stand out like Rudolph the red nose reindeer. Those have got to go. Otherwise, cool truck.
Your conclusion is right on. Seems like the Hyundai products are just not cut out for any type of off-road driving. I suspect this vehicle would immediately overheat or shut off if you took it on your test hill.👎
who's going to be the first reviewer to critique an off-roader with sporty pretentions on a track? And then complain about the tires and high center of gravity?
I like that Hyundai removed the worse-than-useless side steps for the '25 XRT. I would also have preferred that they switch from 18" to 17" wheels/tires, DCT to a "standard" automatic transmission, and added real, physical knobs and buttons for certain controls in a moving vehicle. While I'm no fan of *either* company, for a small "truck," I'd choose a Ford Maverick.
people buy it for the looks and a ford is ultimately in the end, a ford...I had a Baja and loved the look of this car when it came out....just couldn't pull the trigger...ended up getting a Ridgeline but still look at Santa cruz in the rear view mirror and every other one on the road...mavericks, no way...Bronco way better looking but less truck features
Not in the USA. The American branch specifically says it’s pronounced like Sunday. If we were talking about Canadian or Korean models, yes, it would have the extra syllable.
@@drivingsports Incorrect, I worked and sold hy-un-die cars for years, they had the South Korean executives come out and visit us several times and I asked the question, what I said is correct.
@@jasonswift7098Hyundai made a Super Bowl ad in 2009, spending probably $3M, to tell people to pronounce it like this in the USA: th-cam.com/video/xKfU_5jgupo/w-d-xo.htmlsi=HHMH1LmelniZSZdj
Those side steps are clearly just for people who care more about form over function and perhaps don't even understand function. They made me cringe as soon as I saw them.
I'm 6' and found the Santa Cruz very tight up front. I was waist rubbing the b-pillar getting in and out because of a vehicle parked beside, my head was about 1/2" from the headliner, and legs very close to the steering wheel. I can't see many people 5'10 or taller owning a Santa Cruz. I figure this is why the modern compact truck segment hasn't taken off; they don't have enough space with a 4 door cab and no one wants 2 door/access cab anymore, the bed is shallow and not long. The midsize class has a lot more front cabin space and feels more open comparatively.
I'm 5'11, 240lbs. have bulky body becasue I do weight lifting a lot but I have no issue with front seat. Also, I did not have any issue even when I had Golf GTI (mk.7) and Subaru Outback. FYI, the new Toyota Tacoma have less legrom(rear seat) than Satna Cruz. If you prefer more room, yeah you can go with Colorado or Ranger. Don't forget. It's a compact truck. Not everyone needs big full size truck.
Seems like the makers, have watch top gear and the grand tour. So the vehicle shuts off instead of letting you spin the tires like the fool jeremy clarkson does when he gets stuck.
@@drivingsports Great! I am very interested in your review of that vehicle and the AWD with the Dual Clutch transmission. There is a lot of discussion about the use of that transmission. Thanks
That was four years ago. Know what kind of Tacoma you can get for 39k today? A base SR 4x4 in white with zero options. It has less horsepower, less torque, and less towing capacity than a Maverick with the EcoBoost and tow package.
@@RRr-yl8zr yes you’re correct “ I meant all wheel drive “.. ( which is four wheel drive Without lows ).. and the transmission is a problem, low clearance,.. they went out of their way “ the Koreans “.. To Not step on the Toes of Japanese and American Off roadsters till ready
The Ford Maverick and this vehicle show folks want vehicles like this. Since the Subaru's are built on their global platform, they need to bring back the Baja.
I'm actually shocked how Subaru has gone so radio silent on this segment. A segment they literally created decades ago
Car based utes were around before Subaru released the baja, and before that Subaru's own Brat. Remember the Ford Ranchero, and Chevrolet El Camino. Also Volkswagen sold a pickup version of the Rabbit in the 80's. But to Subaru's credit, their offerings were more off road focused/capable than this vehicle is. I think I saw a video on YT that indicated Subaru might be considering bringing the Baja back.
Very true
I'm pretty sure everybody watching this video is looking for a Baja replacement... If there was one available, we wouldn't be here 😂
I love my 18-year-old Subaru Baja, but am in the market to replace it in 2025. I'm really hoping that a new Baja will come out with a hybrid option, as that would far and away almost certainly be my top choice over Hyundai, Ford, Honda, or a Toyota Stout (if that makes it to market).
I bought this vehicle yesterday and disagree with this reviewers negative opinions! I love the quietness and smooth driving of the Santa Cruz XRT. In my opinion, the Santa Cruz XRT is designed for those of us that want the feel and style of an SUV with some truck capabilities and not so much of the mud and off road pleasures. The 2025 model may come with updated technology, but I like the looks of the 2024 model.
Fingers crossed that you never need warranty work done.
Love the background music in your vids Ryan. So chill and gives the viewer a comforting vibe. Keep em coming.
Car company with one of the best warranties, that no dealership will honor.
Bingo
I trust Kia/hyundai like I do Stellantis.
The problem is that in this segment , FORD isn’t a reliable option either. We seems to be screwed either way 😂
Not true
@@Cyberpunk2056 true to them. Not to you.
I have this exact vehicle right down to the color. Generally agree with you except…
I got mine for $38k when Ford dealerships were demanding $5k over msrp on Maverick. I got more for the money.
4x8 sheets sit nicely with the gate at the partial setting.
I don’t agree with you that it drives tight.
It’s a light duty truck. Carries tools and small equipment just fine. Bed lights are really nice.
Has nice bed steps. Rear seat is for the dog. She loves the side steps for getting in and out. I use them too.
Agree it’s not for off road.
Thanks for the review! I bought a 23’ SEL Premium and it’s been great as long as you understand what it is capable of handling. I appreciate that you got the silly XRT trim with the 18” wheels to show capability. Most reviewers only ever reviewed the Limited with larger wheels. I’m glad reviewers are finally addressing these sport and off-road packages that are nothing more than stickers and added weight without anything practical or useful. Speaking of the side steps, my previous truck was a loaded 11’ Ranger XLT and came with these steps and they were equally as useless. They did make it look cool or more like a big boy truck 😂
I think Hyundai was super smart for creating this model. Ford obviously showed that people want a smaller truck. A few things that bug me… the piano black just needs to go. Why do they (car companies) keep putting it in the interior. Second, I really can’t stand the gage cluster is rectangle behind a round steering wheel. So odd to me.
The DCT isn’t a great choice for off roading so it’s interesting they went with that for this trim but I guess with this money people want the more powerful engine.
Lastly a lot of people have mentioned this in the comments but the reliability would scare me to much. Yes they have a great warranty but I don’t want to have to rely on it.
So Hyundai’s “off road” package is basically aesthetic, but with lower ground clearance than the non off road Sante Fe. Oh those crazy marketing execs 😄
Ryan your review was top notch as usual! It would be awesome to see this type of test on the NA 2.5 with standard tranny and AWD. Just curious how well the AWD on the non DCTs handles the trail. Thanks for another awesome video!
Excited for that eventual Ranger Raptor review!
I just don't understand why car companies make these off-road trims, claim the vehicle is off-road ready, yet don't increase ground clearance/ approach angle/ include all-terrain tires.
It shouldn’t be that hard… right?
@@drivingsports the naturally aspirated version with the regular transmission without dct/dual glutch is better off road the all wheel drive system doesnt overheat as easy as the crappy dct.TFL STUDIOS had videos on it
It's because they use marketing to the average consumer to get them to think it can do all these things and it works. Especially because most people just want the look, so it's a good vehicle for them.
I mean subaru with the wilderness trims will increase ground clearance, at tires as standard and underbody protection with redesigned front and rear end for better approach angles which is.. drastically different from the other trims
They're not marketing to you. They're marketing to people who still don't want to leave the pavement, but want to look extra extra like they do.
Love the color, but I'd wait for the '25, the refreshed interior seems worth it to me.
Looks cool, but I would rather save thousands and grab a Maverick Tremor.
Hell yeah!!!
Ford must lose a fortune on those
Just wish the Tremor had the 4k tow package
Was looking at tremor on ford website and price was comparable with less features. Specifically no ventilated seat in maverick. That s/b standard on a vehicle as high trim as the lariat
Now tell me which one will last longer
Love the style and I own a F150 FX4 , I would wait and get the 2025 XRT for sure
Looks good. But still do not trust it for long term use.
Yep. My sentiments as well.
Good for you old folks that are brainwashed.
The sidesteps are likely to give you better access to anything you might have on the roof racks?
The Baja we will never have 😂
That’s a very good looking trim level
Definitely not a Subaru
Yep, the head gasket remained intact.
I agree
This vs the outback wilderness wouldn't even be close
Would you be able to get a Canadian model? We have terrain modes in Canada.
Funny thing about the side steps. Yes they are dumb and my wife and I have to step over them, but I will say our toddler loves the step, so there's that, lol
Every car manufacturer should include toddler steps on their vehicles. 😁
Hey Ryan, great video, thanks. Do you have any information indicating why they went with a DCT wet clutch on this trim/motor? What are they trying to achieve with that vs. a standard auto?
Snow mode for the win
For wired CarPlay, get a smart box. Plugs into USB and makes any wired system wireless. I use on my Cayenne and Outback, works brilliantly.
The Santa Cruz with up to 5000 lb tow rating, does offer 1000 lbs more towing capacity than the Ford Maverick’s max 4000 lb tow rating, however the Santa Cruz doesn’t perform anything really great.
For the price step up to a Ford Ranger with the FX4 package if one is planning to go off road and need the 5000+ lb towing rating, else go with the 2025 Ford Maverick Tremor package with its lower 2000 lb tow rating which out performs the Santa Cruz off road in all categories.
These sidesteps might be a good protection for doors and side sills. Ofc it depends on how rigid their points of attachment are but steel tubes gonna eat impacts with rough terrain better then plastic cladding.
@@RRr-yl8zr At least they may save body panels from impacting boulders once, after which be removed.
The sidesteps are for assistance to place things on a roof rack. Which is what a lot of people
Will use …..a great addition
You know, I think the Hyundai Santa Cruz cross over is excellent for what they were initially intended to be marketed for. But I like that Hyundai has answered the call for a more off-road oriented version with the XRT trim. People have actually built them into Over-land vehicles. So that just goes to show that a platform to work with is a platform to work with.
The reason why I commented though was because the vehicle is actually being done a disservice by the testers turning traction control off. It will have the most capability when using the TPO lock mode if traction control is left on. With it off, it's more like 4wd with no lockers or limited slip diffs. The traction control works in place of limited slip diffs. Minute 15.
If I were shopping for a cross over, the Santa Cruz would be on my list for considerations. It would work excellent for me and could even go further that what many people expect. I would like one for fishing or camping, also taking them to trail heads for Mountain biking, but they also have the nice utility for people that have homes. In America, many of us think that if you don't have a truck, when you purchase a home, it is the right time to have one. So, the Santa Cruz provides that utility.
Interesting look but it isn't off road vehicle. Thans for testing it off road for us. Happy Easter. Greetings
12:40 this perfectly encapsulates my problems with the Santa Cruz and the Ridgeline. The appeal of these vehicles is the pragmatism of a pickup without the inherent issues of owning one.
18:58...Did better than the Honda Passport TrailSport 🤣
I agree though...pavement and wet/snowy roads only.
I hope to see you test the 2025 refresh. I wish they would provide a hybrid/PHEV for better mileage.
It looks like it is oriented around appearances. Not sure giving the vehicle a smart mode helps the vehicle.
KIA is like this as well. All style no substance.
But it's got extra cladding 😂
Not sure if it’s a new addition or not, but the inclusion of “centimetres” is much appreciated 😅
Cheers from across the border!
You gave a good example of light off-roading that does tax the system quickly. The terrain is different around the country. I would like to see how it performs on sandy dunes, unimproved roads, or two-track trails. I would still consider this vehicle even though 90% of my time would be spent on pavement.
Side steps are not only to step in and out the car, if you were a surfer you would probably understand the use of them.
I have the Tucson and I wish I had some steps when I’m using my cross bars.
Looks fine for maintained dirt roads, snow, and parking in muddy grass fields after a rainstorm. Pulling a boat off a slippery or rural boat launch, using forest roads, and using it on rough construction sites? Not so much.
Not a fan of $40K cars having plastic park bench interiors.
You must not be a fan of any cars then
@@dawsongranger4940 There are plenty of cars with good interiors for under $40K. Hyundai fan?
I pre-ordered in '21 and have zero regrets. I did wait until Ford announced the Maverick to see how it stacked up. I mainly agree with you - if you want a small TRUCK, get the Maverick. If you mainly want/need an SUV but also need a truck bed now and then, like I did, the Cruz is more comfortable and way more fun to drive. Also, although subjective, the Hyundai just flat out looks better. The Maverick is just kind of inoffensive and boring. 3 years later, I still just like to stop and stare at my little trucklet. Also agree about the side steps being absolutely ridiculous on the Cruz and that the 18 inch wheels ride nicer. I have the 20s and bought 18s for my winter tires ... they are much smoother, but the 20s do handle a little crisper.
Anyone that off roads knows that those steps are the first thing you would remove if you actually used the truck. It's very obvious that it was added by the marketing team. People that like the idea of off road, but don't actually know anything about it.
Just like El Camino, this is a car for a parking lot in front of the beach and people going to surf.
Side steps are not only to step on the car, if you were a surfer you would probably understand the use of them.
I have the Tucson and I wish I had some steps when I’m using my cross bars.
Wow, it shut the engine off? Wild
Weak transmission plus crappy engine. Who would’ve thought? 😂
Well it’s a Hyundai DCT. No surprise to me. 😂
Almost $42 grand for that huge disappointment? Good review! NO THANKS on this trucklet.
How about $35,500? Can't turndown a good deal.
Got mine for $38k. Not disappointed
Thanks for this vid !
Was looking at trading my 24 awd equinox premier rs for one but looks like I got a better deal atm and thats sad because its and equinox haha.
The “side steps” are rock rails, not side steps. They are there to keep the rocker panels from getting damaged. Also they are there for looks.
Rock rails are typically bolted to a frame. If you try to use these as rock rails they will damage the body of the vehicle. These are absolutely just side steps and only provide an aesthetic.
Looking into this as a replacement for my Kia Stinger. My girlfriend says this is "not a truck" and i agree with her. That being said I justify it by saying its a "ute" an aussie term for car/truck hybrid like an el camino or a subaru baja
SUBARU NEEDS TO BRING BACK THE BRAT! CHANGE MY MIND.
Isnt the Santa Cruz xrt just a Santa Fe trayback with side rails and plastic trim?
Had to protect the transmission after like 30 seconds? lol
Hey, the new Toyota tacoma sheers half shafts in less time doing the same thing. See tlr offroad. Lol😂
Not surprised its a DCT transmission 😂
Toyota hasn't been Toyota since the pandemic. Remember when they announced they were lowering their quality standards due to parts shortages? I don't think they ever went back to kaizen. @@hooty465
It's a DCT. This vehicle is in its own category. It's obviously not a true off-road vehicle.
i think the Santa Cruz is $5k over-priced. The cost is too close to the Ridgeline which is better and bigger.
Can those side steps be removed fairly easily or what? Because I'd take them off.
If you're looking for a offroader hyundai probably isn't the first place you should look, subaru is the obvious first choice but this is a good start sinec jeep is flushing their reputation down the toilet
I was interested in this until you said the seats suck.....Thanks for the review.
Do the 2024 Santa Fe XRT please!!!
Love the thorough and honest review. *no sidesteps were harmed in the making of this 😂
For that price I'd definitely go with a Subaru Outback or Forester. There is just so much more in those for the money, AND they get the job done!
Outback? Forester? Not in the ballpark of competitor IMO. If you said Maverick, Ridgeline, Ranger, Taco, or Colorado, OK, different pros and cons.
@BoopSnoot Subaru's Outback Wilderness, and even the 2024 Crosstrek Wilderness are serious forces to be reckoned with. Quite capable, and have a long proven history in the off road field.
And a Chevy Corvette is a force to be reckoned with... but it doesn't have a bed! @@dennisveazey4469
@@dennisveazey4469I believe the point being made is those vehicles you mentioned do not have an open air bed/box.
Any Subaru is better than a Hyundai!
Tremor Maverick would eat that thing alive.
And the Hyundai would eat the Mav alive at race track(on-road) lol this car isn't supposed to be an off-road vehicle.
They have their own pros and cons. These are 2 vehicles in different categories.
@@anthonylim2428 But it doesn't. Thing is there are Mavericks already on racetracks. Autocross, drags, nurburgring even. We got Mavericks in the 11s in the quarter mile Ford parts and basic bolt ones. We got coilovers for track and trail from multiple companies.
I was between this and the crosstrek wilderness. Went with the crosstrek. No regrets here. (Except that its not a 2.4t baja)
What’s your overall mpg been like in the wilderness? And has Subaru improved the infotainment to usable status
Ford: Maverick
Hyundai: Santa Cruz
Honda: Ridgeline
Subaru: has left the chat....
@@RRr-yl8zr I honestly don't think they are gonna make one and I have no idea why.
@@RRr-yl8zr haha. I'm pretty sure the word "Baja" is prohibited in Subaru factories.
@@RRr-yl8zr I had read in an article where a GM official stated that they would NOT be building a compact unibody truck for the American market because they feel it wouldn't serve the average American. According to gm of it's not body on frame then it doesn't count. If I can find the article I'll try and post it here
They have the Chevy Montana everyhwhere else. but upon my research looks like it's just to small and weak for the us/canada market. I don't understand why they don't make it the same size as the maverick with a stronger engine and sell it here?
Well. I hoped he can wait until new 2025 XRT trim is available which comes with no side step.
Good review 👍
Glad i bought the Maverick.
Cheers
Can’t believe this “off roader” has so poor ground clearance. Also the lack of an off road tire package.
Hope next years model steps up as you mentioned.
Thanks for the excellent review.
Clearance the same as the Maverick.
This is a shit review because the reviewer owns the Mav and is extremely biased.
Bring this to Australia 🇦🇺
Not especially a professional review. This is a sports activity vehicle on a truck. I purchased a hitch mount bed extender for hauling sheets of anything. The Ford Maverick feels a lot less sophisticated but can't haul any better (subjectively). The Santa Cruz is significantly more modern than the competition. This review clearly starts off the trail.
need this xrt for asian market..
No, they need to step up the clutches, otherwise it remains awd pavement queen, i beleive TFL had same experience, i actually wonder if Nathan is happy with his in this regard
Nathan got a 2.5L non turbo with the 8 speed auto not the 8 speed dual clutch.
@@Austin-cg7be actually I do not know what is overheating when it gives the message, transmission or the center clutch pack?
The side steps are for your Dachshund of course.
Do some careful research on Hyundai/Kia, over 4 million defective engines and counting with current Class Action lawsuit in both CAN/USA. Literally every engine they’ve made is defective, except v6. My Sorento and wife’s Elantra…boom. You know the game “6 degrees of Kevin Bacon”, try asking people if they know anyone with defective Hyundai/Kia engine, it’s eye opening.
Is there a particular year range for this problem at its worst?
It's like the 2011s-2016s, you're usually good after 2018. Elantras are notoriously bad at reliability, engine and transmission problems. I have a 2018 with the 1.6 and I LOVEE the engine but the transmission.... It's a lot to be desired.
You might need to do your own RESEARCH again…because you are full of it lmao. Never owned a Kia or Hyundai but this is just blatantly false
@@Lalaafastroliit’s totally a thing, have YOU done any research? My boss just bought a telluride and the trans blew up at 10k miles. I know tons of people that had engines blow on their Kia/Hyundais too.
aren't you Talking about 10-year Cars???, that doesn't make any sense??
More clearance, ATs, and a rear diff and itll be fine offroad. Oh, and get rid of the side steps.
I think the Santa Cruz is super sharp but the Interior is really disappointing. I've never driven a 2.5 so im curious about what you guys think? The 1.6 engine is the bessstttt but Kia/Hyundai transmissions are just so weird. Both my Soul and my gf's are TERRIBLE in stop and go traffic with the dual clutch and shiftronic transmissions. That being said, I probably wouldn't buy Kia/Hyundai ICE again /:
2025 gets a new interior. I've driven the 2.5. It has enough power, its direct and port injected so should stay clean of carbon, it seems reliable, its mated to an 8-speed torque converter instead of a DCT, it tows 3500lbs, but... its rated 24mpg combined, when for the exact same power output the hybrid in the Maverick will get you high 30s. Efficiency is its only real flaw. :(
None of this is true. Turbo engines have lower compression ratios to compensate for the turbo boost compared to higher compression ratio naturally aspirated engines, or they have variable compression ratios like on some Nissan turbos. Virtually all non-luxury turbocharged engines are designed to run on 87 octane, including this Hyundai. Most naturally aspirated engines are also direct injected for emissions/fuel economy reasons, but this Hyundai if you research is both direct and port injected to avoid carbon buildup. @@RRr-yl8zr
Its not a typo, you're on the internet google it, virtually all modern engines are direct injected. Some engines are direct AND port injected, it switches as needed to avoid carbon buildup while keeping fuel economy high and emissions low. @@RRr-yl8zr
@@RRr-yl8zr damn that's really good to know, both of my cars have turbos and I definitely put cheaper gas into them. We do maintain them really well, but anything I can do to create longevity, I'll do because you can't always trust other people to have your best interest in your car. I really like their 1.6 engines, BUT I have noticed rough starts with the Kona and it's a freakin 2021 model so there you go -____-
@@BoopSnoot I'd really like to test the 8 speed transmission on the highway and stop'n'go traffic. The DCT on my Kona is TERRIBLE in slow traffic, it shutters and jolts. It's a fun little car on hills and mountain roads and I love the little car, but idk that it's gonna last that long /: Good to know their 2.5 is better in reliability over time for sure!
You ever going to do a Rivian review?
Love the look of this vehicle trim from Hyundai, but I cannot get past those red center caps on the wheels. They stand out like Rudolph the red nose reindeer. Those have got to go. Otherwise, cool truck.
Your conclusion is right on. Seems like the Hyundai products are just not cut out for any type of off-road driving. I suspect this vehicle would immediately overheat or shut off if you took it on your test hill.👎
Needs brake controller, new transmission for the turbo motor.
who's going to be the first reviewer to critique an off-roader with sporty pretentions on a track? And then complain about the tires and high center of gravity?
I like that Hyundai removed the worse-than-useless side steps for the '25 XRT. I would also have preferred that they switch from 18" to 17" wheels/tires, DCT to a "standard" automatic transmission, and added real, physical knobs and buttons for certain controls in a moving vehicle. While I'm no fan of *either* company, for a small "truck," I'd choose a Ford Maverick.
people buy it for the looks and a ford is ultimately in the end, a ford...I had a Baja and loved the look of this car when it came out....just couldn't pull the trigger...ended up getting a Ridgeline but still look at Santa cruz in the rear view mirror and every other one on the road...mavericks, no way...Bronco way better looking but less truck features
Purposely uneducated review. Hit hills at speed so you get clearance. Smart and snow are road settings, not off road settings.
cant have sharp handling without a firm ride...
Off-road ready xrt
Hy-un-die not hun-day
Not in the USA. The American branch specifically says it’s pronounced like Sunday. If we were talking about Canadian or Korean models, yes, it would have the extra syllable.
@@drivingsports Incorrect, I worked and sold hy-un-die cars for years, they had the South Korean executives come out and visit us several times and I asked the question, what I said is correct.
@@jasonswift7098Hyundai made a Super Bowl ad in 2009, spending probably $3M, to tell people to pronounce it like this in the USA: th-cam.com/video/xKfU_5jgupo/w-d-xo.htmlsi=HHMH1LmelniZSZdj
@@drivingsports I dont give a fuck mate What I am saying is correct what you are saying is Bullshit ok.
Not true, from an actual Hyundai Sonata owner.
Is this worth considering for occasional off road adventure? I am looking for a vehicle myself.
my 2015 nissan juke has 360 camera lol
Those side steps are clearly just for people who care more about form over function and perhaps don't even understand function. They made me cringe as soon as I saw them.
Maverick doesn’t look sporty and fun though.
$41K and no tow hitch? too expensive for what it is.
Test the new Outlander PHEV.
Tires would make a MASSIVE difference
A mediocre car but an excellent review, as always!
I'm 6' and found the Santa Cruz very tight up front. I was waist rubbing the b-pillar getting in and out because of a vehicle parked beside, my head was about 1/2" from the headliner, and legs very close to the steering wheel. I can't see many people 5'10 or taller owning a Santa Cruz. I figure this is why the modern compact truck segment hasn't taken off; they don't have enough space with a 4 door cab and no one wants 2 door/access cab anymore, the bed is shallow and not long. The midsize class has a lot more front cabin space and feels more open comparatively.
I'm over 6' don't have any issues
I'm 5'11, 240lbs. have bulky body becasue I do weight lifting a lot but I have no issue with front seat. Also, I did not have any issue even when I had Golf GTI (mk.7) and Subaru Outback. FYI, the new Toyota Tacoma have less legrom(rear seat) than Satna Cruz. If you prefer more room, yeah you can go with Colorado or Ranger. Don't forget. It's a compact truck. Not everyone needs big full size truck.
Think you forgot to adjust the seat lol looks like others don't have issues.
Get a ford maverick tremor or fx4 instead.
Seems like the makers, have watch top gear and the grand tour. So the vehicle shuts off instead of letting you spin the tires like the fool jeremy clarkson does when he gets stuck.
wireless charge without wireless connection is so dumb
The Ford Maverick Tremor puts this thing to shame.
No this thing is not a farm truck for sure. Lol
Ryan!! YOU really need to review a new 2024 Hyundai Santa Fe XRT!
We have a request in for it. Just waiting for them to send one to the PNW.
@@drivingsports Great! I am very interested in your review of that vehicle and the AWD with the Dual Clutch transmission. There is a lot of discussion about the use of that transmission. Thanks
It's pronounced as He-yoon-dai not Han-dai FYI.
We always use pronunciation as preferred by the company’s USA division. And here is Hun-day.
Ryan, thanks for the review.
That Santa Cruise is definitely Not for the PNW.
$41k?! Ouch. In 2020 I bought a Toyota Tacoma TRD Off Road for "only" $39k.
That was four years ago. Know what kind of Tacoma you can get for 39k today? A base SR 4x4 in white with zero options. It has less horsepower, less torque, and less towing capacity than a Maverick with the EcoBoost and tow package.
I feel like if the Santa Cruz doesn’t have hybrid…then what is the real point of the Santa Cruz. The maverick makes this vehicle look funny imo
it has four-wheel drive, so that's a stupid comment, the ford Hybrid does not...
Speaking of stupid comments....@@reserva120
@@TimeMariner which part?
@@RRr-yl8zr yes you’re correct “ I meant all wheel drive “.. ( which is four wheel drive Without lows ).. and the transmission is a problem, low clearance,.. they went out of their way “ the Koreans “.. To Not step on the Toes of Japanese and American Off roadsters till ready
Good review Ryan. I'll stick with my Ridgeline BlackEdition.
Thanks for the review... I'll stick with my Crosstrek Wilderness. LOL
Yes, this is absolutely overpriced garbage
@@billricheter5678 that's a little extreme. Hyundai does make good vehicles.