CinemaDNG vs ProresHQ with Bmpcc original | raw vs prores
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 มี.ค. 2024
- Quality and Compression:
CinemaDNG: Being a completely uncompressed format, CinemaDNG stores each frame as a separate RAW image. This provides the highest quality and maximum flexibility, but can result in large file sizes.
ProRes: Developed by Apple, ProRes uses lossy compression and generally offers smaller file sizes compared to CinemaDNG. However, this compression may result in some loss of detail.
Compatibility and Editing Convenience:
CinemaDNG: Being in RAW format, it offers more flexibility in the post-production process. It provides more room for color correction, exposure adjustment, and other edits, but also requires more processing.
ProRes: ProRes format is known for its lower file sizes and faster processing advantage. Many video editing software directly support ProRes format, making the editing process easier.
Storage and Processing Requirements:
CinemaDNG: Due to being in RAW format, it may require more storage space and processing power.
ProRes: Because of its higher compression, it requires less storage space and processing power compared to CinemaDNG.
In conclusion, CinemaDNG and ProRes are both high-quality codecs, but it's important to determine which one is more suitable based on your needs and preferences. If you require flexibility and the highest quality during the post-production process, CinemaDNG may be preferable, whereas if you prioritize smaller file sizes and faster processing, ProRes may be more suitable.
Join this channel to support me:
/ @iso_800
patreon.com/iso800
İnstagram
/ iso800_insta - ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
I noticed I get the best color fidelity and dynamic range results DaVinci with CinemaDNG. Thanks for the memory card solution too, it works!
Did you buy Kingston?
I did! Worked out perfectly!@@Iso_800
@@Iso_800 I did buy Kingston!
Wonderful comparison! Great colors! 🥰 If storage or SD performance isn't a concern, which do you prefer: ProRes or CDNG?
Definitely CDNG:)
Very interesting, and I think everyone would have their favorite choice for a million different reasons. From my end, in front of my trusty grading monitor, I like CDNG better. Something in the latitude screams "film" more than ProRes to me. Again, I'm one of those who will always lean towards film in all things.
Cdng is my favorite too
I liked Poor People better, but... don't you think the results vary because the configurations are different? Like shadows, contrast etc
ISO, shutter angle, aperture, exposure level are the same. Comparison of two codecs under the same conditions.
I mean, different settings in da vinci, like in prores Gamma is -12 and -18 gamma on DNG