Are We Hardwired To Be Selfish?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ย. 2024
- Are we selfish by nature? Is "human nature" static? How does nature react to nurture? What determines our characteristics? This video tries to examine the misconceptions about "human nature".
Some sources used:
1. www.pnas.org/d...
2. www.nature.com...
3. journals.plos....
4. pubmed.ncbi.nl...
5. www.activesust...
Some of the photos used:
docs.google.co...
Quite informative thank you for this
Thank you. Stay tuned!
Exceptions are not examples
Niceeeeeee.... we need more of this in TH-cam. Thanks for sharing knowledge comrade.
Haha. Thanks a lot for watching.
happy to see another video from you. I’ve been watching you since your first video.
Thanks! Working on a new video, gonna release it soon!
I love your work so so much. Amazing videoo
Thank you for watching! Stay tuned.
Excellent, from a comrade to another: Well done. Liked and subscribed
Haha! Thanks. A world to win.
Nice video dude. Your channel is super underrated, like this is the type of content that deserves to get viral
Hello, beautiful and informative video.
Can you provide the source of that Columbus quote?
His 1493 letter to the Spanish king.
@@SamSinha well I have read it but it’s not even close to what you quoted, I’m curious about the exact source you got that quote from because I can’t find it anywhere.
There are multiple translations though. One, for example: www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/spotlight-primary-source/columbus-reports-his-first-voyage-1493
@@SamSinha you’re still not linking your version, which i can’t find anywhere…
Here you go: books.google.co.in/books?id=NPXCTYxu-R4C
(The part I quoted is available, although in a slightly different phrasing, in the link I commented earlier)
"Bad hierarchy" of Greece gave you origin of science by which you were able to create this video
Class-hierarchies did indeed make human civilization progress a lot, compared to the initial hunter-gatherer stage(s). Christopher Caudwell explains this pretty well: "It is an advance because it involves a sharpening of consciousness at the pole of the ruling class and a more intensive production of social wealth." (Further studies in a dying culture)
@@SamSinha continuing with:"It is a weakness because it produces a deadening of consciousness at the pole of the ruled class and a cleavage between the conscious enjoyment of the ruling class and the blind action of the ruled class. It makes possible a permanent inequality of status because the ruling class, by virtue of directing the labour of the exploited, can also ensure the flow of the bulk of its products into their own lives, leaving to the exploited the minimum necessary to ensure an efficient existence."
Like if equality is some divine goal of the universe
Well, the weakness part is what I talked about here.
Equality in the Marxist sense doesn't mean the liberal equality of outcome. I have a video on that. You can watch that and increase the engagement of this channel.
Such a great video >_
Thanks! Stay tuned
Superb.
Thank you. Stay tuned.
Great video, wish your not a socialist
Lol. Why?
@@SamSinha because there the only ones who argue against human nature being bad plus socialism is garbage
Which socialism are you talking about? People use definitions pretty loosely, so I'm interested to hear which version you're talking about.