Simon Jordan & Stefan Borson DISAGREE Over Whether Man City Will Choose To Settle With The PL 😱💰
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 พ.ค. 2024
- Simon Jordan and Stefan Borson discuss whether Manchester City are likely to come to a financial settlement with the Premier League over their Financial Fair Play charges.
Subscribe: / talksport
Enjoyed this TH-cam video? 😍
🖥️ talkSPORT's Website: talksport.com/
📲 talkSPORT's Twitter: / talksport
📷 talkSPORT's Instagram: talksport?...
👤 talkSPORT's Facebook: / talksport
📱 talkSPORT's Tik Tok: / talksport
🔴 Download the talkSPORT app HERE! - talksport.com/apps/
🔎 Want to see if you feature on our TH-cam channel? Check out our Best talkSPORT callers playlist: • The BEST talkSPORT Cal...
#talkSPORT
#PremierLeague - กีฬา
![[TH] 2024 PMSL SEA W2D4 | Summer | โอกาสสุดท้าย ของสัปดาห์สอง](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/aswciGrYovo/mqdefault.jpg)
Settlement undermines the whole system.
And the money just magically disappears
I’d say it’s pretty fair when they have failed to do their job the past 20 years when they let Abramovich into the Premier League
How? Settlements are part of litigation.
Ha ha . What money. You're wrong in your thinking as usual. There's no reason why city will settle because they want nothing more than to clear their name and reputation to make sure there's no avenue left available for the premier league to to start yet another vendetta and give idiots like you the opportunity to spew more uneducated misinformation.
@russellward4624 yes but regarding ffp, it makes an absolute joke of the system, if you can break the financial rules and then buy your way out of the consequences with the same wealth they have been using to cheat in the first place
@@chucky7826 how did you detrmine they broke the rules? A settlement is a way to assure the party gets some punishment instead of no punishment. And it assures the other party not getting an undeserving punishment. Innocent people are found guilty all the time.
Martin O'Neill's been on the botox
Brilliant 😂
@@ancient1946 Duh OBVIOUSLY missed the joke
@@southlondonmonkeywhen you take some people out , you have to take them back in again.
@@ancient1946
Wakey wakey 😂😂😂
@@ancient1946Jesus Christ mate 😭
Mark my words, this wont be city settling with the prem. It will be the prem settling with city.
City should take them to the cleaners.
All bullshit city will get a fine for none compliance but that’s with eufa not the prem
And they will. Then move onto to other certain individuals.
Surely this is Evertons fault
@@Back2Brick-Benno it’s Sadiq Khans or Meghan Markle.
Thought it was quite amusing when Jordan interrupted Borson to lecture him about City's charges being related to potential fraud and false accounting over a number of years, when it was Stefan Borson himself who highlighted this to Jordan a few weeks ago, along with the fact that, if true, this would have to involve multiple third parties (sponsors, independent auditors etc) - with the kicker that it would therefore be very difficult to prove such a serious conspiracy.
I’m guessing you are a city fan ?
@@willlloyd9480we don’t have fans
@@willlloyd9480 I'm guessing you're not.
I am , it was funny
If the premier league settles. The fall out would be massive with 19 other Premier league clubs asking for answers
What would they do exactly?
@@omatseyeugen5697 sweet f all
@@omatseyeugen5697stop the league from being played
@@omatseyeugen5697 They could easily pull out take their ball and go home like they did before when they made the Premier League after leaving the Football League.
They may stand up against them and say unless Man City face justfied punishments we won't be playing any further games.
The other route could be to take them to the sporting courts there is options the Premier League bosses aren't the top and pinnacle of English football.
They aren't judge jury and executioner if most clubs revolt against them they'll have to change and change quickly to save their league.
@@DTM93You just typed three paragraphs and don’t have a single clue what you’re talking about. The case is no longer in the PL’s hands already. If you seriously think the clubs will “band together and refuse to play” you’re living in a fantasy land.
Simon may get his day in court with the way he talks about City over the last two years.
But how!? Man city have been charged in a civil lawsuit. It's NOT defamation to state and speak or bring up the point that they been charged...it isn't defamation by any stretch. Many city can't hand out cease and assist when its quite clearly that they have been charged by Th EPL..uz it's true.
I'm sure Everton and forest are gnna really be pleased with a settlement. City settle for 115 charges, they say there not guillty of. and Everton and forest get points deductions for something they admitted to? If this happens, premier league loses all credibility anyway!
Yep it shows that the Premier League has no teeth if it can’t prove that Manchester City are guilty or not it does obviously race suspicion. Man City have refused to give any evidence as they been legally advised that they are every right entitled not to so it comes down to the Premier League having to try and prove that Manchester City, are guilty. This is a whole cat of fish compared to Nottingham Forest and Everton.
Is it City settling with the league or the league settling with City. The league embarrassed themselves when they brought these charges against City. City have never settled on anything, ever.
Takes 2 to tango
@@RSLang919 you sound clueless....so if a cop pulls you over suspecting drunk driving and you do the test and are cleared, your at fault also WTF
@@rakimrobinsonMCFC it wont be settled the premier league will go bankrupt and the super league will start you dont mess with trillionaires
If guilty the sanction must not be financial. Money is nothing to the city ownership.
Their crime is that they spent as much as Arsenal and Man United. Oh, the horror.
And what if they are found not guilty? What is the punishment for the premier league, some of the other clubs and the millions of little Hitlers that are running around with zero knowledge base demanding punishment… what happens to all of them?
@@Marais-cu3voWow you actually think this is what it’s all about, the cheats have been cooking the books for years and the fact that there legal team have constantly put obstacles in the way to postpone it going to court speaks volumes, if they aren’t guilty they would have had this case go to court already to clear there name, you lot are deluded.
@@Marais-cu3votheir crime is that they’re cheating scum
@@Marais-cu3vo Are you stupid? they have been charged with bloating their profits.
Notice how Stefan always seems somewhat coy on CIty's case, but quite "matter of fact" on other clubs? Now advocating financial resolution not a form of punishment for them.
Because one is a fraud (subjective) case and one is overspend (numerical). The City charges are criminal in nature so it's opaque and grey (coy).
No…. He said that that ship had sailed, it might have suited both parties mutually to do that but it's gone to far and that the premier league would be less damaged now to lose the case than to settle. You literally made your version up to suit your own narrative
do your research he said in a interview before the PL has not said what the exact charges are in detail where as all the other clubs are saying yes we are guilty
I'm a lawyer and I can tell you Simon Jordan doesn't really have a clue what he's talking about. There's only so much money you can spend on a legal case before you quickly get into diminishing returns. From that perspective there is clear equality of arms.
U r a lawyer and are we supposed to believe someone who lies and manipulates poorer people for a living
@@conorhayes9567 All my clients and opponents are large companies. I don't deal with poor people. Also, if what you say is true and I'll do anything to get ahead, wouldn't I be saying spend all you can - because that would make me richer. But I'm saying don't spend so much, which is against my interest! Think my friend.
@@conorhayes9567you’re as clueless as Simon on lawyers!
There's also the issue of reputational damage to the individuals implicated. It's hard to see City settling.
Let me tell you, nobody even knows of City's supposed charges nor even cares outside England..Only Prem rivals want to hang onto that 😂😂😂
@@Whooooooaaamaaan small club nobody cares about? Keep on Deluding yourself just to feel relevant 😂😂😂
City is well known in Africa, America and most in Asia too ... Escaping from reality with teenage little jab jokes won't help you 😂😂😂
@@Triple_X_Xwow you know every football fan in the whole world. Impressive!
@@Whooooooaaamaaan🤣 perfect response absolutely perfect.
@Whooooooaaamaaan if nobody cares about City why is all the talk about City? When they talk about Everton the comments is full of "what about City?". When they talk about Forrest its "what about City?". When they talk about LCFC they ask "what about City?".
Simon Jordan is such a prick. Stefan is saying both sides are well represented. EPL has high priced lawyers and so does Manchester City. What is Simon waffling about?
Because he's a City fan and knows this is absolute bullshit and wants his Tinpot club to get off Scot free.
“No no, um um um, man city bad, bad, if not found guilty its um um um money! Yes, evil money! Vs the poor pro-bono PL lawyers.”😂
Easily- cases take time, the premier league will run out of money far quicker than city
@@Danimal28the premier league isn’t ever conceivably going to run out of money to pay legal representatives they already likely have on retainer. This is just simply untrue.
Yes, the Premier league spent over 20m on legal fees last year. Sure they can up that if needed @kevinmurphy1880
According to Simon no team is bigger than the league......then again, according to Simon Man City is bigger than the league! What's wrong with this guy?
As a team, no team is bigger than the whole league. You must abide the rules the league sets and must follow the the guidance given. However, financially, Man City have a nation state to back them up and the prem have a large, but not nation size pot to draw from.
@@KindaWheezy so are you saying Man City has the capacity to bully the Premier League? You can't act big and small at the same time
Poor Simon. The lad is twisting himself into knots trying to craft a narrative that a Prem who settles has been bullied by City's capacity to lawyer-up. By all means, Simon, ignore an inconvenient reality that a Prem who settles is indictive of said league not having the there-there to substantiate they allegations. If the Prem turtles after being so certain about their case . . . that is a harsh repudiation of their character and integrity as an organization. For shame, Prem. For shame. Pray for Simon, fam. Lad's going to be subject to some awful stick.
Is anyone following the pattern, the rules were made by our rivals, the rules were adjusted to ensure we failed, we defend ourselves and our lawyers are too good, now the money we spend on lawyers should be counted towards FFP....that's what Simon hinted at. The entire thing is manufactured and City will clear their name.
Maybe because your rivals are not a nation state , which to be fair Newcastle is as well and 3 times as big as City. The Prem has got themselves in a mess, 1st with Abramovich , then the leveraged buyout at United and finally the one two punch of unlimited oil money. This is on the PREMIER LEAGUE and we need an independent regulator to sort this out. The league cant keep its hand out the cookie jar and seem to be obsessed with these unsaved characters that couldn’t care less about our clubs. These are OUR clubs not billionaires and unlike Germany we dont have a say. Althgough we never win , Levy at Spurs simply wont risk our finacial future trying to compete. I just hope we dont end up with a yank like Chelsea. How do you spend a billion and end mid table.
@@adammohamed.. Utter nonsense...stopped reading at Newcastle are bigger than City haha 😂
@@SuperCityMCFC Saudi are at least 3 times more wealthy than the emirates, ( of which you are owned by the biggest of the 7 Emirates )
Saudi have $1 trillion invested in America alone.
@@adammohamed.. Irrelevant if you can't spend it
Did your rivals pay Mancini from a private bank ?
it really is obvious when simon is debating someone who knows his stuff in his industry
was the same with hearn in boxing, simon is really easy to tell when hes out his depth and its happening more and more these days
He is still broadly a quality presenter if not the best he ain't perfect though
Unfortunately, his head is too far up his own ass...
I think, if they settle with Man City, the other 19 clubs should pull out of the competition immediately
You don't even know what they have or haven't done.
@@IanDavis-fs8dd I’m not claiming to know
I think Simon does not understand the legal process involved. Both sides have able lawyers ,some getting paid ridiculous amounts.The fact is that some of the best young sport lawyers are not even involved in this case. In the 21st century you will find many many lawyers who have experience and knowledge of sports law. The case will be won or loss on the facts and evidence presented, not on which lawyers are employed.
Thanks.
Most sensible comment I’ve seen so far. No support from me for city here, but to assume they’ve been able to lopsidedly spend their way into winning a legal battle based on the skill of their representatives is beyond naive.
PL should never contemplate a settlement, truth needs to be upheld and if guilty proper punishment given…example made, so that no one ever tries to UNDERMINE the best league in the world!
So the pl changed a team 115 times but are now afraid to go on with the case because money will be lost? Wtf? They should have known that from start, who they are up against, right?
Whatever happens the pl must not back down, crowdfund if necessary
@@Pa-pb6kbAnd if the pl lose?
@@GermanChickenwing do you think justice should be dictated by whether you can intimidate one of the parties involved? If they lose they lose
@@Pa-pb6kb How can City do that with money? The pl are the once changing City not the other way around
@@GermanChickenwingthe bindippers will probably help crowdfund them, that's if they can get a job 😂
Simon has completely missed the point
Difficult when your wearing such hateful blinkers
That’s all he seems to do when it comes to this stuff
@@ancient1946so have you 😂
They've said it could take 5-10 years to settle these 115 charges against City. A financial settlement is definitely MOST LIKELY!
The premier will have to settle city for reputation damage and force to apologize live
Why does Simon interrupt Steffan before he has a chance to reply?
I wonder how much Stefan Borson is getting paid by City to be their public spin doctor?
Same amount as you for sucking boys off.
how much is sky , bbc gets paid by red cartel clubs to br their propaganda machine to tarnish city?
He’s the only person that speaks fairly about City on this topic. He’s not even spinning anything
Jordan, can't stop talking and interrupting. He has to prove daily how clever and articulate he is. He fully beleves his words and statements are sacrosanct.
as soon as Etihad airways goes on the stock market the whole case is gone and the Premier league is open to a huge settlement paid to City for dragging their name through the mud.
The legal fees are a red herring. Both parties, and any premier league club, have enough money to hire the top level of barristers and solicitors for as long as needed.
Asking an ex Man City financial advisor, about Man City's fraud, is like asking a thief about a stolen painting.
He has nothing to do with the current owners. He handled the sale to Thakshin Shiniwatra.
@@russellward4624doesn’t suit the plastic agenda unfortunately Russell.
Man City…..the excuse for everyone else’s clubs failings 😂
Translation. Let us try and make out that if city are cleared its because of the money available. Rubbish
Why do they invite Stefan, he is clearly on City payroll
What evidence do you have of this?
Because he doesn't indulge in the smear campaign? Take your hate blinkers off
@@bluemoon1716 I understand your point, however to me he defends City all the time but not any other club. Just my opinion, City only guilty when proven so
@@user-sy4el9me1zThat's because those other clubs u're referring to have already admitted to their guilt or have denied any wrong doing and were found to be guilty of those charges...
City on the the other hand continue to maintain their innocence and so far the Premier League has yet to provide enough evidence to actually convict City for those charges
@@user-sy4el9me1z I wouldn’t say that he defends City. He just speaks about City and the entire situation impartially and based on the facts available. Nobody else is willing to do that, so it comes off as if he is defending the club
Simon's smirk when Stefan said they are commercial people haha
The problem is, Simon is too emotional about it. Stefan talks from the perspective of cold hard facts and is completely emotionless about it. Simon wants it to be true with all his heart and he can't keep that emotion out of his language and behaviour.
@@leighhudson9279if it wasn't for time frame technicality than city would have been banned from Europe. Obviously some sort of truth to it
@@shamus3477 that's completely wrong. You are just regurgitating the same uninformed nonsense that the fan on the street believed to be true because of the way the media chose to report it. The court papers are there to be read. Most of the evidence was not time barred and all were deemed to be insufficient evidence. The time-barring is a pink elephant!
@@shamus3477 that's just not correct. Go and read the court papers. The majority of evidence was not time-barred but was found to be insufficient. The minority was time barred but was noted in the court papers that it was considered no more on favour of uefas case than the rest of it. Please read the court papers before trying to talk about it as a matter of knowledge.
@@shamus3477 God you are an absolute moron
Simon is bang on, City will bury the Premier League in legal fees if they can. It’s fucked
That simply isn’t a possibility here
Lost all credibility this bloke S.B
how so?
@@Gdatshim probably said something OP doesnt agree with.
The 115 case has become a liability for the Premier League, because they failed to do their due diligence💀
They’ve got to get relegation and titles stripped, otherwise the game has lost all credibility. 115 FC are just pure corruption
The PL is looking to settle, not MC. Let's get that straight. They can't prove the slanderous charges they brought out of pressure from the big clubs and are rightfully scared of being sued for defamation.
115 charges FC.
Yes most people are in denial and just want city to be punished 😂😂
"And there's no corruption, of course" lmao...
- LiVARpool caught Hacking
- LiVARpool never called Hackers FC
- City found Not Guilty in Court
- City regardless are called Cheats?🤣
Jordan says he’s got no agenda against city then goes on to speak like they’re definitely guilty
Why do you @talksport invite a lobbyist like Borson and present him like some objective expert??
Jordan being a knob as per usual........zzzzzz
“Not because I want one” Simon referring to not wanting a settlement. There you have it folks. Simon confirming he doesn’t want Man City escaping punishment.
Nobody should want a settlement. If rules have been broken, there should be punishments. Simple.
@@frasierfreak92 and if rules haven’t been broken then equally there should be punishment. Punishment for all the media propaganda and misinformation and witch-hunt against Manchester City
Simon Jordan and everyone who isn’t a city fan , bravo sir jordan
@@frasierfreak92 and if the rules haven’t been broken, there should be equal punishment to anyone else involved in this which hunt against Man City
If premier league had evidence against city it wouldn't take so much time ! That's tell you a volume. Simon don't want to hear the truth!
Get it right, it’s the cheats lawyers that have stalled it from going to court, why would they do this if your lot aren’t guilty.
If you take away the time spent in legal hearings between the PL and city it's not been that long considering the number of years the allegations relate to.
How many charges to get through can't wait for the result
The PL clearly does have evidence if it's charged them 115 times. 😂😂
@@Chris-oz9qxdoesn't work like that cause they are still looking for the so called evidence
give premier league a load of money and it all goes away
You guys have no topic. Slow news day. City won't settle. They're innocent
how do you know they;re innocent
@@rickoneillableinnocent until proven guilty that’s how
VAR and corruption in the Premier League has ruined football. They can shove it-their 'greed is good' ethos is obscene. You can keep it- i would rather watch non-league football and womens football. More skill, more honesty, more players playing for the love of the game in their local communities
If the Premier League agree to settle for a financial sum I will fully get behind your comment but I think FIFA have to set the standard. As Simon likes to say the fish rots from the head down. When FIFA are handing World Cups to warmongering, murdering megalomaniacs it's hard to ask the leagues beneath them to set a standard of irreproachable virtue.
💯💯 agree with both of u! This is a joke now, it can’t go on any longer
You lost an element of support with the frankly ridiculous "more skill" bit. Don' be silly.
@@mariechu6123 come back with something remotely intelligent to add when you have rewatched the WOMENS EUROS AND WOMENS WORLD CUP-HIGH SKILL ON DISPLAY.
@@user-te1hi9rx7b I assume you are joking . Hilarious nonsense.
Why do they keep getting this Richard Nixon lookalike on?
Why do they continually bring on a bloke who used to work as a financial adviser to Citeh' to talk about this?
One that knows what he's talking about and Simon Jordan.
Stefan is still in the pocket of City and he’s very arrogant to boot
Jordan interrupts all the time when he’s losing the argument
If they don't face any consequences for their actions given what the league has done to Everton and Notts Forrest then what is the point anymore.
Simon does love a soapbox
a "cease and desist notice " notice is issued knowing your in a strong position
They can’t settle out of Court! It undermines the integrity of the whole League! If they get away with this! I don’t even know where to start!!!
How can they settle when they broke the rules.
Broke what rules... Please explain.
Turtle rules 😂@@Another_Dimension2024
Why didn't they settle with Everton and Forest
Because unlike City, Everton and Forest are clubs with integrity who accepted the charges rather than disputing them
@17Deano98😂No they didn't. They both appealed their charges. 🤡
Because they admitted guilt. City have not. Pretty easy to understand
@@bluemoon1716 Not really. If you admit guilt you should be treated more leniently. Just like the way Tonali and Toney are being handled differently. City, if they are trying to settle then they have equally admitted to some wrongdoing and should face the same wrath... However, the FA is the original godfather of corruption, and city have enough money
@@b.tedley2586 Another clueless 🤡
The right question is whether Pep will choose to settle with PL and the answer is absolutely NO!!
Pep is a greedy serial winner..He wants to win everything
Wont be down to pep to 'settle'
@@multipl3 Pep manages all the accounts receivable and payable through Salesforce before he takes training every day.
Fraudiola
The f would it have to do with pep, hes just the manager not the ceo.
The prem will be losing sleep hoping City settle with them ...they are slowly drowning.
I've been saying for a while now, man city will beat this
A settlement to 115 but not to anyone else? And that’s NOT anything to do with 115 being more powerful, intimidating and richer than the league, UEFA etc??
It’s smelling like a stitch up, boys. All other clubs should refuse the punishments pending the 115 outcome.
Then we’ll see what’s what.
Zzzzz
Borson is an absolute clown to think City won’t have a clear advantage with the resources they have. 😒
The problem for me is if they settle then surely they have to with any other club that’s does what they have. It’s certainly not fair on the clubs that have suffered this season and I care more the supporters then the clubs involved.
Care more about having a functioning brain. Everton and Forest admitted to what their charge was. City have 115 charges and deny all of them. Pretty self explanatory why the first two were handled quickly the the latter is still ongoing.
Settling with one club does not mean they have to settle with others. And considering the situations are completely different, that logic makes no sense
When did Stefan work for Man City?
Before the sheikh talkover, he helped in city being sold to the ex thai prime minister. He had nothing to do with the sheikh buyout.
@theo9372 No, I was just asking the question as I did not know thanks for giving me the information
He's a man 115 city fan , mate...
@@AnthonyODOnnell-tt8gh😴
I think for the good of the game settling would be a bad idea if they are proven to have broken the rules then they should be punished heavily as it sets the wrong precedent
If this is true then the pl have failed.. How can you changed someone 115 time and then looking for settlement? What type of settlement are they even thinking of? Pay City some money?
because they have zero evidence to win the case
PL are always making errors.
@@neilfarricker8632No that’s you’re opinion not a fact, big difference.
@@Ramps-rc9iy Same as UEFA who had no evidence either. That's a fact for you
@@Ramps-rc9iywhat's the evidence then?
As a City fan I would find a 'settlement' unsatisfactory but the argument that City shouldn't want it because the whiff of suspicion would always remain is a nonsense one. This has become so tribal that even if City were to be cleared by the PL, UEAFA, CAS, the ECHR, The United Nations, the Pope and the Dali Lama those who want to believe will still believe ....... regardless of the evidence. There is no neutral 'court of public opinion' on this.
Simon looks almost desperate here.
In football as in Business he who has the deepest pockets Wins!!
If premier league don't have money
Their owners " red cartel"could lend it to them
one rule for city.
Smarmy lawyers doing shady things👊🏼
So glad QPR got done all them years ago. We’ve almost finished paying off getting promoted
All this man does is give a fact based opinion and everyone acts like he’s a paid up city fan 😂
He is a Man City fan though. Has been all his life too. He can't be objective on this.
@@solskjaer1195 who can be objective on it? certainly not united, liverpool, arsenal fans etc.
@@HC-np2hb The PL can. Why would they pick on City for no reason? Viewing figures aren't down on the league. It doesn't make sense. City have been rumbled and they don't like it. That's all this is about. There's no way 115 charges can all be errors.
@@solskjaer1195Who owns the premier league?
@@solskjaer1195 guess which 2 clubs decided the head of the Premier League?
If the PL/FA settle with city i will positively campaign for a Super League because a settlement will be the death knell of English football as we know it.
They’ll get away with it 😂 you’ll see
Stefan Biased
Rules, are rules, are rules. If they've broken the rules throw the book at them. End of.
Does the premier league have the evidence to back it up and are the people who were working at city that time managers etc willing to testify against city ? 🤷 think about that mate
So they trying to say they could pay money to do as they like but other teams get points taken away hmmmm Shameless
Money truly does solve all problems
It's like finding out the arm wrestling champion for the last four years has been using steroids and still letting him compete
Why do talksport insist on getting in Borson, who's one goal it is to defend City?
He is defending the truth
How is he defending city? He's just stating facts. It's not rich vs poor, neither side have a financial advantage because both can afford the highest quality councel. That's just a fact. He has always said, if city are found guilty, the punishment will be massive! But it's a big if!
@@leighhudson9279I think it’s a big if regarding you lot getting away with this, no smoke without fire.
Balance
Stefan is a huge city fan! I grew up with him
The concept of spending their way out of charges of overspending is a joke
Does the settlement also involves compensating the other teams? Because it’s the other teams that suffer not the PL!
Settlement is the best way to go , 👍👍👍👍👍👍
Points reduction and more . Can't just be a settlement
You must be a City fan 🤣
Yeah for the prem. If I was City I'd take them to the cleaners.
Sir Jordanite = Top LAD Proper Clobber ✊
I will always argue the opposite position no matter how insane that appears .Thanks Simon
If theres a financial settlement i am 100% behind FSG joining a super league with real madrid and barca and leaving the league immediately
lol
Paste and repeat, for gods sake this guy is on every week and the same conversation happens. Wake up talksport and put something new on.
Stefan is about as entertaining as a rotting fish
Simon Jordan ruined that discussion with his constant interruptions and talking over Borsen. No point having an expert on if an amateur constantly talks over them. Jim needs to do his job and control the discussion.
Settlement will herald the end of the PL. Too many other clubs have had sanctions and penalties placed upon them to allow such a position to pass.
Moron, those other clubs admitted to their charge. Man City have 115 and deny all of them. Pretty easy to see why the first two have been handled quickly and the latter is still ongoing. But that doesn’t fit your narrative so carry on.
Man City need to give certain evidence which they won't give, they did it in the UEFA case and then put in a little info later on which meant it wasn't conclusive evidence. They will do the same and get charged for maybe one or two charges which will be a 6 point deduction. It means Forest and Everton are happy, its sort of obvious what will happen.
The UK courts ruled that man city had to provide information to the PL for the investigation and make enquiries of third parties. I am pretty sure I read in a legal journal they had complied with that ruling.
Another TH-cam lawyer 😂
I urge everyone to boycott the prem if they "settle" these charges... absolute stain on an already dying product
If they settle every premier league team should boycott every game involving the 115 club!!!
Just give city the 3 points every week then lol good logic
Simon is talking shite PL is not broke they afford top lawyers, of course, this is a high-profile case City will get the best in class lawyers also. Simon stop shifting the goalposts
That chap should replace Simon
Why cant they prove one of the 115 charges and take 5 points of city this season ? If they cant even prove one charge this whole thing is bs.
Because that's not how it works dummy.
😂Clueless
Might as we scrap ffp if they are allowed to settle
a fine means nothing to these people
These people? What's your people made off then? Go on, tell me your club let me break it down and embarrass you
@@AAL-mu8ms yes John you break it down lol
come on mate who do you support
@@AAL-mu8msyour poor grammar and overall use of the English language is genuinely embarrassing.
@@AAL-mu8mswhat’s the club he supports got to do with it? The state of Abu Dhabi have ridiculous wealth, he’s right a fine would mean nothing to them. Only points deductions or a transfer ban would hurt
Lets not forget the beautiful football they played
The chap mentioning legal fees is talking complete sense - maximum spend is £5 to £10 million, Simon Jordan comments about reputational damage is absolute rubbish - if City get a damaged reputation clashes with Jordan's idiotic statements IE on one hand they have limitless funds but our worried about reputation - put it this way I do not think anything less of Everton or Forest for their breaches. The fans are still the fans and the teams are still the teams.