Off-Road Tire Size Comp: 255 vs 285 vs 295 vs 315 vs 37"

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ย. 2024
  • Off-Road Truck Tire Size Comparison Part 3:
    255/75R17 vs 285/75R16 vs 285/75R17 vs 295 vs 315 vs 37" in video chronological order:
    285 COMPARISON 1:10 mark
    255 SPECS 2:35 mark
    295 COMPARISON 4:30 mark
    315 COMPARISON 5:20 mark
    37" COMPARISON 5:55
    *TIRE CALCULATOR: www.tacomaworl...
    *Purchase through my Amazon Associate links (no purchase necessary)
    Yokohama Geolandar G003 - Mud Terrain
    255/75R17 Load Range E: amzn.to/3LGmLX7
    285/75R17 Load Range E: amzn.to/46lPH0b
    285/75R16 Load Range E: amzn.to/4dj6uDl
    BF Goodrich KO2 All-Terrain Tires:
    265/70R17 Load Range C: amzn.to/2FtPNsa
    265/70R17 Load Range E: amzn.to/2RKF3MA
    275/70R17 Load Range E: amzn.to/2M6yy18
    285/70R17 Load Range C: amzn.to/2RRUBhG
    285/70R17 Load Range E: amzn.to/2CphIpM
    315/70R17 Load Range E: amzn.to/2Wvi4Vc
    35/12.5R18 Load range E: amzn.to/2Uzn61k
    BF Goodrich KM3 Mud-Terrain Tires:
    33x12.50R15/Load Range C: amzn.to/2WxPx1f
    295/70R17/Load Range E: amzn.to/2WzZQBO
    305/60R16 Load Range E: amzn.to/2RNnvPR
    33x12.50R17/Load Range E: amzn.to/2ML3DYs
    Mickey Thompson MTZP3 Mud Terrain
    265/70R17 Load Range E: amzn.to/2STGZj4
    285/70R17 Load Range E: amzn.to/2Fvy5Eu
    295/70R17 Load Range E: amzn.to/2D93zi0
    305/70R17 Load Range E: amzn.to/2RKGuKY
    Nitto Ridge Grappler - Hybrid (All-Terrain & Mud):
    265/70R17 Load Range C: amzn.to/2McJBGo
    265/70R17 Load Range E: amzn.to/2ssR36R
    285/70R17 Load Range C: amzn.to/2FxKcRt
    285/70R17 Load Range E: amzn.to/2SSqHXD
    285/75R17 Load Range C: amzn.to/2MISIie
    35/12.5R18 Load Range E: amzn.to/2TkXdlv
    295/65R20 Load Range E: amzn.to/2UAagQm
    OUR VIDEO PRODUCTION GEAR LIST:
    DJI Air2s: DJI.com
    Panasonic GH5: amzn.to/2ML7uVL
    Metabones/Canon EF lens adapter/speed booster: amzn.to/2DOZYWM
    Canon 90D DSLR: amzn.to/2t2N1mb
    Canon 24-105mm f4L lens: amzn.to/2GkMR1l
    Canon 50mm f1.4: amzn.to/2WNYR17
    Canon 100mm f2.8L Macro: amzn.to/2GfU8jU
    Canon 70-200mm f2.8L lens: amzn.to/2TtuvPx
    Sigma 18-35mm f1.8 Art lens: amzn.to/2Gn8yh5
    Sigma 150-600mm f5-6.3 Sports lens: amzn.to/2GwdmAW
    Tokina 11-16mm f2.8 wide angle lens: amzn.to/2MODGYb
    Manfrotto Carbon Fiber Tripod: amzn.to/2t4Wppo
    Manfrotto Video Monopod: amzn.to/2MNQrCf
    Moza Air Camera Gimbal: amzn.to/2t6gkEc
    (2) Olympus Audio Recorders: amzn.to/2GjQxQR
    (2) Polsen PL-5 Lavalier Microphones: amzn.to/2HPwnke
    Rode VideoMic Pro: amzn.to/2Ty1imk
    *Please subscribe and send us your feedback, questions, and/or video requests in the comments section. Also check out our social media pages:
    / freedomedia
    / freedomriding
    www.mauioffroad...
    Stop by the Maui Off-Road Centers in Hawaii:
    MORC - Oahu
    94-1388 Moaniani St #103
    Waipahu, HI 96797
    (808) 678-9500
    MORC - Maui
    251 Hoohana St
    Kahului, HI 96732
    (808) 871-6263

ความคิดเห็น • 21

  • @Buck795
    @Buck795 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Running a 37x12.50 17 Toyo Open Country RT Trail on my 2020 Power Wagon. Stock suspension with tires mounted on a Method MR315 17x8.5 with +25mm offset. Have about 10000 miles on them and love them so far. Great on road and fantastic off road!

  • @gmg5396
    @gmg5396 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Keep the tire comparison videos coming! Would love to see a 305/70/17 compared to a 285/75/17, as i’m still debating what to go with on my taco

    • @JLC8504
      @JLC8504 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They will be the same height, but 305 will wider.

    • @everydaybettereverydaystronger
      @everydaybettereverydaystronger  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Depends how much trimming you want to do and the wider definitely eats more gas! What do you think of 295/70/17? I ran those on my previous 4R which took a lot of trimming but looked 🔥

  • @half-way
    @half-way หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    我很喜欢窄胎,一直想把我 Bronco 的 315\70R17换成 255\80R18 左右的轮胎,但是中国窄的34-35 吋胎基本没有🤧

    • @everydaybettereverydaystronger
      @everydaybettereverydaystronger  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@half-way narrow is the way to go! Better MPG than wide tires and retains some power from the motor

  • @garrettarendsen7465
    @garrettarendsen7465 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m putting a 2 inch leveling kit on my 2015 Silverado I’m hoping 285/75/17 bfgs will fit in their perfectly with no rubbing

    • @everydaybettereverydaystronger
      @everydaybettereverydaystronger  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@garrettarendsen7465 that’s a tough call but it should fit especially if you stay conservative on the wheel offset. Have you tried looking at the Chevy forums?

  • @JLC8504
    @JLC8504 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    He acts like he doesn't understand why the 285/65r18 is wider than the 285/75r17. The middle number is a percentage of the first. So if you have a smaller middle number, you still have 285mm, so the tire gets wider. And they're still close to same height because the wheel is bigger in the 285/65.

    • @everydaybettereverydaystronger
      @everydaybettereverydaystronger  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Actually you have half of it correct. The first number, 285 in this situation, is the width in mm, the next number is the tire’s aspect ratio, which essentially tells you how tall your tire’s profile is: Aspect ratios are delivered in percentages. Tire makers calculate the aspect ratio by dividing a tire’s height off the rim by its width. If a tire has an aspect ratio of 70, it means the tire’s height is 70% of its width. So yes this is why I was so surprised the 285mm Mickey is way wider than the Yokohama with the same stated width

    • @JLC8504
      @JLC8504 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@everydaybettereverydaystronger yes, but the reason why one 285 is wider than the other is because the aspect ratio is different. Smaller aspect ratio with the same width (285) means a wider tire.

    • @Clanc54R
      @Clanc54R หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@JLC8504 the aspect ratio refers to the height of the sidewall from rim to top of the tire measuring in the percent of the width. The width of a 285 stays the same regardless of aspect ratio. For example a 285/70R17 is a tire with a width of 285mm. The measurement from rim OD to the top of the tire is 70% of 285mm. Radial tire, and on a 17" wheel. So a 285/70R17 and a 285/65R18 are exactly the same size (on paper). The side wall will be smaller in height because there's more wheel OD now. Again, aspect ratio has zero to do with width

    • @JLC8504
      @JLC8504 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Clanc54R He proved what I'm saying in the video. The 285/65 is wider than the 285/75. If you take a 285/75r17 and a 285/70r17, the 285/75 will be taller and slightly narrower than the 285/70.

    • @Clanc54R
      @Clanc54R หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@JLC8504 that's just different manufacturing dude. Different brands. You literally have the internet. Look up "Tire Aspect Ratio." I'm done arguing with stupid here

  • @adrianw3985
    @adrianw3985 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I run 37's... it's easy on a Jeep.

    • @everydaybettereverydaystronger
      @everydaybettereverydaystronger  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@adrianw3985 yes it certainly seems to be, especially with clearance! Which Jeep you driving and did you regear? I’ve been eyeing a Gladiator

    • @adrianw3985
      @adrianw3985 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @everydaybettereverydaystronger 5.13's are pretty popular for 37's.

    • @adrianw3985
      @adrianw3985 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@everydaybettereverydaystronger a Gladiator

    • @everydaybettereverydaystronger
      @everydaybettereverydaystronger  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@adrianw3985wish there was an option to attach pics here