Outback Octagon 2 - World's Best Player, World's Worst Spawn [Game 3]
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ก.ย. 2024
- Age of Empires 4 (AoE4) guides, casts and gameplay are here for all civilzations, including the English, Chinese, HRE, Mongols, Delhi Sultanate, Rus, French, Abbasid, Ottomans & Mali.
🔥 Exclusive coaching content is available on Patreon 🔥 ➤ / aussie_drongo 🔥
You can check out Beastyqt here ➤ / beastyqt
You can check out VortiX93 here ➤ / vortix93
You can check out ZertoN here ➤ / zerton
You can check out Szalami1 here ➤ / szalamii11
You can check out CrackedyHere ➤ / crackedyhere
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
🔴Twitch ➤ / aussie_drongo
💬 Discord ➤ / discord
🐤 Twitter ➤ / aussie_drongo
📸 Instagram ➤ / aussie_drongo
🌎 Facebook ➤ / aussiedrongo
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
#ageofempires #ageofempires4 #aoe4
![Outback Octagon 2 - "YOU HAVE NO SHAME" - TheViper [Game 5]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/020niszaid0/mqdefault.jpg)
![Outback Octagon 2 - "YOU HAVE NO SHAME" - TheViper [Game 5]](/img/tr.png)
![Outback Octagon 2 - EVERYONE GETS A WONDER [Game 25]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wWe4NWAiEPU/mqdefault.jpg)
![[FULL EP.16] เซียนพาลุย "เผือก-ฟรอยด์" กรี๊ดลั่น จนปูหนี | เฮ็ดอย่างเซียนหรั่ง | One Playground](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FsqUvwS3b-Y/mqdefault.jpg)
After watching Beasty try to manifest the perfect setup for himself on his stream the other day, but for it to end up like this is absolutely hilarious.
“King is safe, we boomin” 😂
That was after this game. That’s why he was going on about it, because people were salty he quit.
@@some_gh0st lmao if he said that for predictions, thats funny af 😂😂
Where can I watch his streams?
@@kevibsmith3543 Beastyqt on Twitch and TH-cam
Suggestion to avoid close TCs: if it's possible, give the 3 villagers bigger line of sight until they start to build the TC
I think that's the first suggestion on the matter that I would actually consider an improvement. Is that somethin that can be done with mods? Although I bet there would be people complaining about Chinese or Rus players finding their starting TC too easily to harrass with a Barbican or Kremlin
Just everyone start with a scout
@@con_boy Scout can be really anyoing if you can get it to enemy before they have tc
@DeViT it's still running a 3 minutes treaty. Just let them have 2hp or something. Or just make it a rule you can't block tc placement
@@con_boy good point, forgot about the treaty.
and good counter point too
Spawning with a scout might help this issue
This regicide mod with 50 extra pop from killing a king is cool.
fr is there a mod for this we can download lol
@@Schoenmann3 You can download the Outback Octagon 2 Mod with the Outback Octagon rules if I remember correctly
I would give a scout at the beginning to every player to solve the "too close TCs" issue.
And for the king's max population increase I would cap it at +100 extra population, that way every king kill still gives a big boost, but killing several doesn't snowball too hard.
Really loving this mode even though I never liked FFA ❤
but then you don't get to see a horde of almost 200 knights steamroll everyone else
Beasty got what could only be called his worst case, Delhi squished between a Chinese player
Can't wait. This is my first time seeing a tournament series as it happens as only just find this channel. Can't wait for the games. Apart from the starcraft players these are all new. So cool seeing new players from this octagon series and seeing what ones i like
holy what were those spawns, left side was a desert while right side was an orgy. can't even be mad at beasty for doing what he did, being sandwiched like that and the 2 players pick on him
I get that Beasty was in bad spot, but quitting that early and forcing everyone else to deal with it is kind of unsportsmanlike. Especially when he is in a tournament with money on the line, sometimes an early kill can make a ton of difference for the other players.
dumb opinion
bbeasty is a loser lol i wasnt surprised at all that he rage quit like a little girl
Its only 2.5g for winner and other prizes aren't much different if it was more money I bet he would of played on
@@liamlangford9840 its still not very sportsmanlike since king kills make a difference in the game.
i think this is a totally reasonable argument, but i disagree. the situation he spawned into is a complete joke / meme, and there is literally no interesting gameplay that can result from his situation. on some level, the rules should be such that high level players (/ players in general-- i think beasty's concerns are generalizable to all players, but let's be real: we all care about top-line players playing more than most other players) actually *want* to play out the game, ie it's actually worth their time, and the current ruleset did not accomplish that. (i'm posting this late enough that i know that the rules have changed, and i think the rule changes-- e.g. spawning with a scout-- are very positive). yes, you can take my line of reasoning to the point where someone is being a prima donna asshole, but i just don't see how beasty can even *honestly* play the game without arbitrarily picking one of his 11 neighbors to randomly get first blood (and probably 3 points, since they won't have hit castle), which is actually enough of a point swing to genuinely affect the tournament. i am a fan of beasty, but by no means am i some sort of beasty dickrider, and i would not, in general, endorse this sort of "protest" action, but in this *specific* case i think it is actually fairly justified, and, honestly, him quitting before giving 3 points randomly to a neighbor was legit the best option. I am glad that drongo has already acted to fix these issues, and were he to do the same in the same situation under the new rules, i would not endorse the same course of action. mind you, beasty is the one who has to live with the repercussions of insta ff-ing the game regardless (ie getting 0 points), which is "punishment" enough. remaking the game was out of the question; how things played out seems to me to be the most equitable outcome possible.
1:54
"We know what happens when two girls get stuck with one cup." - Aussie_Drongo, 2023
That's the line of the century right there.
XDDDD
I think a no surrender rule could be good for the tournament. Even micro details like losing a small portion of your army to finish off an enemies base and kill their king can change the result in a future fight. Since you are rewarded for killing the king it ruins it when someone hits the ragequit button.
Definitely negatively impacts the game when people surrender in this game mode. That shouldn't be allowed. It sucks to get sandwiched, but just play it out. Be a good sport.
He alt+f4ed. I think they don't have the surrender option. Simply ban such players from all other games and tournaments. I don't give a shit who the player is, it ruins the experience for the viewers who are the main reason these professional players have money outta game.
Also, it sets an example for the community and reflects what idiots we allow among us. In general, gaming communities should grow up and start ignoring kids with attitude, collectively push them away or humble their asses. It works charms in any other industry, dunno why it remains in pro gaming full of adults.
@@JamesCh. exactly this. So unprofessional and a slap in the face to the organizers, viewers, and especially his colleagues. Obviously he can do whatever he wants but you'd expect less childish behaviour from such a strong player, or at least some basic respect for his fellow players. Yikes
@@Matticusjkliterally couldnt play and had had 2-3 denying his expanion and had striker/crackedy/ running around after they realized he was trapped. There was no ruined experience for amy viewers except beastys who didny get to watch who they were there for. It was very unprofessional of what that dumbass purple did to Beasty.
@@AquaHeartVGCGaming the mode has a mechanic that boosts the player who gets the kill. Beasty quitting denies that to others who deserved it fair and square
When you say you can move to a new location after popping your first TC sets you back so far that I feel you would never be able to catch up.
Easy way to improve the spawns.
Let all the vills spawn in the middle, basically next to each other. They won't fight each other because of the treaty time and they can fan out and pick where they want to build.
Yeah, so if one has a strong civ for early aggression, you just follow the one you want to kill and spawn a TC next to him...
@@CrommVardek or just insta put it down while everyone runs away
nah
Knights from Striker were straight up menace!
Im curious what the admins ruled on beasty leaving. The rules say that a king kill is no longer worth points only in case of a desync, which didnt happen here. but then again feels unfair for everyone else to give crackedy points for beasty having a cosmically bad spawn. on the other side the Fs in FFA dont stand for fair
I personally think Crackedy should get points for assassinating Beasty. Otherwise, Beasty's ff is stealing points from the field.
Honestly, I think ppl saying beasty could have come back from this are wrong. Yeah he is not tied to the landmarks and could go to the middle, but his opponents are no silver players. With that much of a disadvantage I can't see any player coming back in his situation tbh.
for real he's squished between two chinese players and his relocation out is surrounded by two mongol players, it's like the people watching this don't even play the game haha
@@baunach You got it exactly right. Beasty ragequitting surely isn't the best thing to do for sportsmanship, but Beasty is a pro and he knows that surviving that situation was impossible, so why even bother
Slowly but steadily developing my inner Drongo Fanboy
That was glorious! Well deserved for all Striker's proactivity early on
Striker with 350 pop french civ is the nightmare of gold tier.
I think that the flat increase to pop just becomes too strong, unless you allow alliances against a player who has gotten three or more kills. Another option is to change the pop increase from 50/50/50/50 to 50/25/10/10/10. Makes it so that getting kills is still an advantage, but you don't end up with 2x the pop after four kills.
Alliances against "run-away players" are already allowed
I think 25 pop per king instead is better and more likely to be possible through modding.
I felt the same way, but on the flip side players don’t actually benefit from the increased population until late game and it can be risky going to kills early.
There has to be a fairly big incentive for sacrificing early game for a late game buff.
Great video however i think we need some rule improvements to make the games abit more fair for everyone:
1. Decrease the Population advantage to 20 as 50 just creates run aways especially if you spawn in next to 2 others and quickly roll them.
2. Ban quitting, you must play out the game until your king is dead and if you do surrender early you lose points as it really takes away the fun of the game and can cause confusion about who gets points etc.
3. to fix the spawn issue give each player a scout and give them 1 - 2mins before a TC can be placed down to scout the area (or just tell them a TC cant be placed until the 1 - 2 min mark)
Other than that the new rules are sweet!
Delhi in FFA + 3 players surrounded = Disaster
maybe 25 pop would be a bit more fairer ?
Maybe depending on at what age the kill is made?
The lack of placing/position in the game makes it impossible for a player to do anything once behind. Ie even if the king survives, and you somehow manage to die later, there is no point. As simply you won't be able to kill anyone else.
but getting eliminated later is better.
Dick move by Beasty, no excuse for it.
Cry more
My fav line "Where are you king?" (Sounds like Coming to America)
honestly, as much as its wild to have spawns like this, it really removes any semblance of parity
I've seen a couple of comments like this during the games as well and I've been wondering how one would go about doing that. Or rather, what is there to be fixed? Players know what the maps look like in general: Tasmania with water on the edges and lots of resources in the center; Uluru with most resources in the corners and relics distributed along the edge of the map while the center is totally devoid of resources; how many trade posts and sacred sites there are, and where approximately they'll be located. They spawn in with three villagers in three different loations. They then pick their TC spots themselves. Sure - that's not something you want to wait too long to do (except for GUA maybe...), and of course you at that point just don't know where the other players are, but we're not going to change that now, are we? We don't see the first 1:40 minutes of the game, which is a bit of a shame, but at that point Beasty and Simtom seem to have gathered all their starting villagers in one spot, as far as I can tell from the mini map. That might mean that they had their villagers spawn a bit closer together, which in turn might limit their choices for TC spots, but I would consider the ability to bring all your starting villagers together faster than other players an advantage on most maps. Any script forcing certain spawn points on the starting villagers or enforcing greater distances between starting TCs will, in my opinion, totally defeat the point of this game mode. If anything, the OO2 starts are already less random than they were in the OO1 due to the predictability of the map generation itself. I think the map spawn is as fair as it can be, and the maps themselves are wonderful. The fact that some players will, after 5 minutes, through no fault of their own, find themselves in a more difficult position than others is an intended part of any FFA game mode.
@@llAlukall Easy way to improve the spawns.
Let all the vills spawn in the middle, basically next to each other. They won't fight each other because of the treaty time and they can fan out and pick where they want to build.
@@DeeJamz You know what, that sounds like a lot of fun. No idea how it would actually play out, I'd love to see it tried at least. Although I would consider it a different game mode altogether, random spawns and the lack of knowledge about the other players' positions and starting conditions are in my opinion important elements of a Nomad FFA.
I think people take this game mode a little too seriously. It's supposed to be chaotic. It's random spawn 8 player FFA Regicide Nomad. It's not meant to be a balanced game mode...
Literally been refreshing for this
Games shouldn't be THAT decided by spawns. The first player was eliminated by spawn RNG. The last three standing had the best spawn positions, no arguments. A 200-pop player was the last to die and could hold against higher pop opponents for a long time just because of location and neighbourhood. Not to mention how far from water some players can spawn vs others being literally on the shore right from the gate.
This is the only issue with the format and the whole tournament, otherwise it's the best and most fun thing about AoE 4 by far.
I've seen a couple of comments like this during the games as well and I've been wondering how one would go about doing that. Or rather, what is there to be fixed? Players know what the maps look like in general: Tasmania with water on the edges and lots of resources in the center; Uluru with most resources in the corners and relics distributed along the edge of the map while the center is totally devoid of resources; how many trade posts and sacred sites there are, and where approximately they'll be located. They spawn in with three villagers in three different loations. They then pick their TC spots themselves. Sure - that's not something you want to wait too long to do (except for GUA maybe...), and of course you at that point just don't know where the other players are, but we're not going to change that now, are we? We don't see the first 1:40 minutes of the game, which is a bit of a shame, but at that point Beasty and Simtom seem to have gathered all their starting villagers in one spot, as far as I can tell from the mini map. That might mean that they had their villagers spawn a bit closer together, which in turn might limit their choices for TC spots, but I would consider the ability to bring all your starting villagers together faster than other players an advantage on most maps. Any script forcing certain spawn points on the starting villagers or enforcing greater distances between starting TCs will, in my opinion, totally defeat the point of this game mode. If anything, the OO2 starts are already less random than they were in the OO1 due to the predictability of the map generation itself. I think the map spawn is as fair as it can be, and the maps themselves are wonderful. The fact that some players will, after 5 minutes, through no fault of their own, find themselves in a more difficult position than others is an intended part of any FFA game mode.
@@llAlukall i guess they could start with enforcing (1) min and max range from another player to spawn (can't be closer than x or farther than y) and (2) for maps like this one, force tight distance range to shore (either very close to shore for everyone or like between two and three screens away from shore for everyone).
You still retain the randomness of the map, you are still spawned randomly with relation to other players, there are still random civs... but it could be more fair and much more watchable.
@@dr4kun To me that sounds like an entirely different game mode. Which is fine, why not, but I wouldn't consider it improving Nomad FFA.
There's no spawning a certain distance from other players because the players themselves chose where they place their starting TCs. There's not even spawning at a certain point because your starting villagers spawn in different places across the map. Unless you want to change that, some players' bases will end up close together, and some players will end up alone in a corner. Because the TC placement and the distance between the bases, before anything else, does not depend on a map script. It depends on player choice, made with limited information, knowing everyone else is out to get you. And that's how this game mode in particular is supposed to be played.
One could force 24 equidistant villager spawns with equal distances between every player's three starting villagers (or all three villagers at the same location) and at a fixed distance from water sources. On the already predefined maps. And to make it more balanced let's also enforce fixed distances between TCs as others have suggested. Of course all of that is possible. Because that's just the normal game.
OO1 was a Nomad Megarandom FFA. As I said I like the maps we have seen so far, but I haven't made up my mind yet whether I'm really happy with OO2 being only semi-random (the player spawn is, but the map generation isn't). But from what I understand the tournament is at least supposed to be and supposed to stay a Nomad FFA, and I'm really grateful for that. I think there are some good suggestions, like making the Tasmania map a little bigger as Drongo said. Or giving the starting villagers extended vision or let every player start with a Scout as other commenters wrote, both would give the players more information without taking away from the premise of the scenario. Those are suggestions that I think are helpful and worth considering.
Really sorry for ranting a bit, but I just don't think that making the starting conditions even less random improves this game mode. It just makes it less of what it is supposed to be.
@@patrickducloux7523 That's a good point, in the OO early fighting is heavily incentivized. For that very reason I don't think it's a good idea to make all starting locations public to all players. Limited knowledge about the other players' starting conditions is, in my opinion, an important part of the game mode. An early Scout so as to give every playersmore information about their immediate surroundings in the first two minutes of the game sounds like a good idea though.
its not spawns its where players decide they wanna go. this is nomad
Wonder if they considered giving the mongols a mounted king to offset the lack of defenses
1:52 only and you have me in stitches
that was super fun. yeah definitely need to evenly arrange the starting locations! i'd be mad if i was beasty honestly
"We know what happens when two girls are between one cup......... where do we even go from here.. wow this is already a write-off" Dude you can't be saying that kinda stuff while I'm in a work environment I literally can't keep my shit together
Another awesome game congrats striker 🎉
i loved to watch this kind of rts game holy shit enjoyed a lot
I don't know why but it fills my heart with joy to see mongols being bullied. Thanks Drongo for these awesome games, they have been great!
Yes Beasty spawned in the absolute worst place possible. But just quiting and not trying is terrible for his brand. No one can take away he is a 1v1 master mind with insane apm. But tons of people love community games and that will drive the game forward more than the 1v1 scene for casual players. Look at aoe 2. So for one of the best players in the game to just quit and not even try to make an insane comeback feels just sad for the game in whole. Like imagine if the viper was in a community aoe 2 game, bad spawn and just ragequit. or hera, daut, etc.... Hopefully beasty realizes that he made a big mistake and says sorry. And again there are a bunch of proposed changes below to try and circumvent this in the future, but would of loved to see him play it out.
Take one point off them if they surrender
Mongols seem like a terrible Civ for this game type. Walls are crucial.
This map needs to be bigger, it basically enabled Striker to steamroll everyone
This on an arhcepelago where are on the players start 2 large islands with one or two smaller uninhabited islands to the side would actually be wild.
Yeah that's not a fair and even match, that you can spawn in between 3 other players. The more fair the better the competition, whatever the sport.
Tasmania is like Stewart Island. Always being left out of maps lol
hahaha you made my day, 2 min into the video Drongo keep up the good work!
that was a good one 😂
If anyone else had quit like that Beasty would have been the first one making a massive issue out of it. All the other players saw it through to the bitter end even when their chances of survival were slim to none,there's always a chance of picking up some points,not least for a player of his calibre. There should be a penalty for throwing in the towel or you'll end up with players just quitting when it looks as if things aren't going their way. Anyone who watches Turin's FFA streams knows that quite often good players can come back from nearly being wiped out to win.
dumb opinion
Ya, its just poor sportsmanship to surrender like this.
Braindead. You tell me how to get out of being squished between a barbican and a tower. Falling way behind on resources because all your villagers are pushed off their task. Nah, I wouldn't waste my time and neither would most.
That background music absolutely slaps, holy shit
Is it just me, that I'm hearing Astronomia after watching Beasty surrounded?
Ah...to be honest Beasty had his fault in that. He saw China next to him and anyway, he decided to build TC nearly, while he had 2 workers on the other map side so...then he noticed 2 more players around and was gg.
Beasty is cursed, he wouldn't win even if the opponenets were average diamond players with that spawn
Beasty chose where to build. Him quitting to steal away points from the other players was really lame. There should be a penalty for stealing away those extra units.
@@SeigmeyerFreud stupid opinion
@@SeigmeyerFreud how did he steal the points crackedy still got them for killing him
@@tusharranjan1723 I didn’t catch that part. Crackedy didn’t get a population boost though, did he?
@@SeigmeyerFreud he did get the boost, but sadly he didnt get to utilize the boost coz szalami attacked him pretty soon and after that it went only downhill for crackedy
Maybe have the land mark town center be revealed to all player for 3 seconds when the building starts so people kind of know where others are at.
SImtom thought only him made beasty quit, he thought he's better than beasty lmao
Maaan StriKer absolutely dominated this game!
Bro I been watching your videos the last few daze- how I get in on this matches, I just started playing aoe4 -
wait, what happened to those girls and one cup??
They all had to pee in the same cup.....😅
I had hope for crackedy lol
ah, found the vortix's king at 40:16 top center
Yeah. Could also see it on the mini map. He pulled it out of his transport ship so the game did not last forever
@@billthomas2154 haha yes, had to track it down from mini map only.
This is the major fault of nomad. I think each player should spawn with a scout and maybe prolong the treaty too.
Shouldn't leaving be against the rules? In the spirit of the game, players need to make the best of whatever situation they find themselves in and they only lose when their king is sniped. With an exception for the last two players.
BeastyQT: Piper Perry edition
Beasty needs to be like Pedro Pascal and be in everything
i think 25 pop should do it, still a bonus but not too much and it's not auto win
Owing to constant cost (400G) for treason, civilisations with no walls like Mongols are all too easily exposed in midgame/lategame. All you have to do is keep clicking on treason and attack the town centers with your cavalry spam mass. 400G is nothing in lategame.
I suggest to implement a dynamic pricing for treason. Or make its price based on number of enemy villagers like in age of empires 2. That way players use it a bit more conservatively, you can hide your kings better and this opens up chances for comebacks.
The map generation needs to be fixed... there are really unfair situations when some players have too much free space and other 5 squeezed in one corner
It has nothing to do with map generation, its the nomad mode
u know what nomad is?
I've seen a couple of comments like this during the games as well and I've been wondering how one would go about doing that. Or rather, what is there to be fixed? Players know what the maps look like in general: Tasmania with water on the edges and lots of resources in the center; Uluru with most resources in the corners and relics distributed along the edge of the map while the center is totally devoid of resources; how many trade posts and sacred sites there are, and where approximately they'll be located. They spawn in with three villagers in three different loations. They then pick their TC spots themselves. Sure - that's not something you want to wait too long to do (except for GUA maybe...), and of course you at that point just don't know where the other players are, but we're not going to change that now, are we? We don't see the first 1:40 minutes of the game, which is a bit of a shame, but at that point Beasty and Simtom seem to have gathered all their starting villagers in one spot, as far as I can tell from the mini map. That might mean that they had their villagers spawn a bit closer together, which in turn might limit their choices for TC spots, but I would consider the ability to bring all your starting villagers together faster than other players an advantage on most maps. Any script forcing certain spawn points on the starting villagers or enforcing greater distances between starting TCs will, in my opinion, totally defeat the point of this game mode. If anything, the OO2 starts are already less random than they were in the OO1 due to the predictability of the map generation itself. I think the map spawn is as fair as it can be, and the maps themselves are wonderful. The fact that some players will, after 5 minutes, through no fault of their own, find themselves in a more difficult position than others is an intended part of any FFA game mode.
Well, that turned into a longer comment than expected. Sorry about that.
It's nomad, they choose where they put their tcs
@@JustWantBred not really, you can't waste time and have to pick a spot nearby your villagers. So it is somewhat random, and you also have no idea where other players are
I swear I am the first person to watch episode 3 .. I just couldn’t wait
I love your content bro
I think spawning w/ a scout would make for better tc placement/gameplay
Outback Octagon is much improved, loving it, but TC spawning still needs some work up
there is no TC spawning its nomad
@@zaganim3813 I know
Beasty could of atleast tried
he played for 10 minutes of a 42 minute match
@@baunach he still didn't try in my option just straight up quit
@@liamlangford9840 dumb opinion
When 2 girls are.. what now??? Drongo, you gotta get cancelled one day!
Hah, I love how drongo has talked up so much about how he/they changed all these rules in order to make the game more enjoyable. Yet one of the most simple factors of: spawning 4, sometimes 5, players stacked on top of each other can't be fixed. This just leads to boring early game gang ups to eliminate sandwiched players in the first 10 or 15 minutes. Then gives those players a huge advantage the rest of the game for teaming up on sandwiched players who stood 0 chance anyways due to a horrible spawn, pinned on both sides. How is that entertaining... Put in a simple code that spreads players out a little further on spawn... Last game and this game it is the same thing, early game play is just gang ups to take on the sandwiched players that don't stand a hope in hell to begin with; then the players that did the gang ups reap the rewards and have a huge pop. boost for the rest of the game how is that fair or even skill? Would much rather watch strategic alliances like last season if they can't fix spawns. atleast you see some skill shining through in that type of game play.... Can't say the people I know, or myself enjoy this style much where early teamers/gang ups get huge in game buffs for the rest of the game for little to no skill or resources spent... 👎👎👎
@@patrickducloux7523 yep, I agree... even if they didn't eco but had to commit some kind of troop loss and resource loss which when you surrounded it seems you don't have to commit anything because the sandwich player is so suppressed. Too much of success or failure rests on the spawning here, and with a reward on king kills it results in ganging on the weakest (weakest being what seems to be the player in the middle)
100% agree yussss
Yeah and to say you can move base, you are too far behind, after having all your resources pushed in etc. From having players stacked on top. Too much weight is on players spawn, should be spaced a little nicer to allow for more skillable play to be more the deciding factor, right now it doesn't feel like that's the case...
Any surprise here that it's a player who spawned in their own resource rich corner thatwon? With another player who spawned in their own resource rich corner was runner up? Drongo even called it in the very beginning of the video that because his spawn he has an easy win 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 this is jokes. I don't know why these players even play this, feels 90% spawn based, 10% skill based to determine the winner
Spawn fix needed....
I think forfeiting and taking points off the board for other players should have consequences, Beasty quitting like like was so trash
100% poor sportsmanship, but from what I've seen of Beasty its doesn't seem out of character. They should change the scoring to remove points for rage quitters or for OO3 have a nomad style mode where the king has to set up a town centre and jump inside. Should be a cav unit too, no king would be walking.
Are these spawns random because a lot of people loose in this simple because of the spawns . Seems unfair. Should have atleast a 10 second scout ride to another tc
1:54 youtube demonetisation speed run world record attempt
i think they should spawn at 4 corners and the 4 middle edges... and if water death is problem make rule no kings allowed on transport ships...
Couldn't the players spawn at predefined spots?
Why this same map again do u guys have limited maps for this season.☹️
Why don't they just spawn 2 players on each side of the map?
i like beasty alot but thats horrible to watch even with money on the line just throughs any chance on scoring.
ive lost respect for him as a player, time to watch somone who doesnt rage quit
feel better now that you've cried into the endless youtube void?
Cry more. People rage quit on video games all the time.
Nice cast. Please try to fix the Chat. It is important to follow.
Spawns are fucked 3 guys in 1 corner and they got a dudes close on both sides, so cluster of 5, while red and blue are isolated far away from any other player
Bad spawn is a handicap, needs to be addressed.
This map is not good. Too luck reliant. And running your king to a transport ship should be a unique situational strategy, not the default play.
That was a really screwed up spawn. If you wanna run a tournament, there should be at least some notion of parity.
Yo the spawns in these games are dumb, please fix
5 players on one quadrant of the map, lmfao
Spawn fix needed .........😅
man i was really looking forward to beasty beasting on dudes
Spawn fix needed .........
Let's goooo!
Not random map? :'(
Good day fellas and welcome
That game was monka
but also cool
Love this series, it even more fun if you imagine it like Squid Game where the players die for real! =-D
These spawn points are straight up stupid. They are dictating who wins by at least 50% influence
to many knights
Why I don't like beasty ,rage quitting because u not winning
I think 50 pop per kill is perfectly fine. Striker played phenomenal and deserved this victory. It's lame though if players surrender in this game mode...
Imagine the default pop of Aoe4 was 400. I still don't know why modern RTS games still go with old school pop caps. That knight push was legendary and actually felt like medieval armies clashing.
why would you let beasty cont the tournament, when you said no one is allowed to surrender??? ruins the fun of these matches, and stick to the rules set...
you outlined the rules in the prep videos for this series.
🚫🍮