The first lenses I'd buy for wedding videography

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 18

  • @lyndonlabayan
    @lyndonlabayan  หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The hypocrisy of shooting most of this with F1.8 and 1.2 is not lost on me.

  • @CivisCreativeFilms
    @CivisCreativeFilms หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Lumix 24-105 also has IS making it a great lens for hand held shooting on the wedding day. I like to swap between that one and the Sigma 28-70.

    • @lyndonlabayan
      @lyndonlabayan  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Totally forgot about the IS. Great point!

  • @karthikeyans8922
    @karthikeyans8922 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hey, I just bought a S5II with Sigma 24-70 f2.8 II. While checking the settings, if i set exposure mode to M and turn the aperture dial, am getting rattling sound. Is it am issue or how to fix this. In P mode that noise is not there. Also, in P mode i hear that type of sound if i zoom in ir out the kens. Any thoughts? Appreciate any help here.

    • @lyndonlabayan
      @lyndonlabayan  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Rattling doesn't sound good regardless of what your settings are... I would update both your lens and body firmware first, maybe do a reset and then try again. Good luck!

  • @Mat_McD
    @Mat_McD หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I have been loving shooting weddings with my 24-105 f4, but I need to pick a prime lens for exactly your reasons. I can't decide between 35 and 50. Why do you opt for the 35?

    • @lyndonlabayan
      @lyndonlabayan  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I find the 35ish comfortable in terms of positioning and framing. It's wide enough uncropped for me and can get plenty tight when I crop. A 50 would feel too tight on the wide and I imagine I'd have to really work to frame up in a hotel or smaller bedroom or something like that. I think anyway!

  • @endah08
    @endah08 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The ghost of MFT has come to haunt you. A GH7 will follow you in your dreams for the rest pf your days.

  • @ohdeazy1567
    @ohdeazy1567 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    what do u think of the 28-105 2.8 instead of the 24-105 F4 ?

    • @lyndonlabayan
      @lyndonlabayan  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'd feel comfortable at a sale price... totally a mental game for me but ya, if I saw the 28-105 at 200ish off, I'd do it. That or if I opted to not pickup a 'low light' lens and depending on how I felt about IOS cranking for low light, the F2.8 could still work.

  • @marin_real_estate_photography
    @marin_real_estate_photography หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks, Lyndon. Can I ask what sort of lighting you use for speeches? Are you using a fresnel? There are some small(ish) lights by Zhiyun and Godox (and probably others) that look promising, but I am not sure how well they work with modifiers. Anyway, thanks agin for the video.

    • @lyndonlabayan
      @lyndonlabayan  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I used a set of Apurture LS60X. I got them before the launch of all the smaller cob LEDs. The godox lights look good! I wish my lights were smaller but they do have a focusing element built in for spot lighting. You can't go wrong with any you mentioned but the accessories and power options should be your deciding factor.

  • @ocimaging
    @ocimaging หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'll use that 35mm f1.2 for you heheheh.

    • @lyndonlabayan
      @lyndonlabayan  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Come borrow it when you get back here!

    • @ocimaging
      @ocimaging หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @ looking forward to 🙏🏾

  • @mirrorlessmemory
    @mirrorlessmemory หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wonder why you call yourself a hobbyist wedding videographer? Do you feel like you have imposter syndrome? Cause honestly there’s not much difference between you and a “pro” if at all.

    • @lyndonlabayan
      @lyndonlabayan  หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's mainly because it is a hobby! I book less than a handful a year, only as much as I have time for. This hobby does have the privilege of making some income but even taking that into account, it's not enough to even qualify as a side hustle... it does buy a lens or body every now and then though!