@@TheGinajaja Royals back then spoke French bc they were French. We haven't had an English monarch for 1,000 years! I'm no expert but only the extremely wealthy had a formal education up until relatively recent times. The average person didn't speak French.
I love reading the comments on these videos to see if others are as fascinated with the history of England and astonished by the fact that there are still ACTUAL documents and even clothes that these royals wrote with their own hand or wore on their bodies have been so well preserved for 400,500,600 years!! Its amazing!
The English are second to none in the preservation of their history. Not even the other states within the United Kingdom have half the enthusiasm for telling their story.
Grandfather: Edward III known as one of the greatest King in the history of England. Father: Edward Prince of Wale better known as the Black Prince , one of the greatest knights in the history of England. Then there comes Richard II ... known as one of the greatest if not the greatest Tyrannical King of England. Seriously what the hell is wrong with this kid? how can he not inherit even an ounce of his father or grandfather's good trait? WTF?
He was given the pressure at age 10. Edward III had at least one parent with him until he grew up. The black prince had his dad with him his whole life. Losing your parents at grandparents at age 10 and then being given the pressure of a whole country does things to people.
Fr tho many did. Harold the 1st the English hero and his wife "swanneck" was a love match. Edward 1 was messed up when his wife died the crosses he erected still stand. Richard the 3rd grew up with his wife. Even the usurper Henry 7 was said to be happy with Elizabeth York. Eddy 4 and the white queen. Eddy 8 gave up the crown for his wife.
I kinda think Joffrey was based on Edward of Lancaster - son of Margaret of anjou and henry vi cause after seeing his mockumentary I am convinced that Joffrey is worse than Richard ii, if Richard ii was anything like Joffrey than he would not been able to crush the peasants revolt, wouldn't have been loved by anne of bohemia , have two successful campaigns in Ireland, wouldn't have been shown Mercy by the lords appellant in 1388, and definitely would been have killed as a teenager.
@@balajinathan6713 OMG I was not expecting that 😂 I'm actually laughing so hard 😂 You do have a really good point, I'm laughing because I wasn't ready for the "Joffrey is worse than Richard II", that was a great twist! 😂 But yeah, you do have a really good point. Perhaps G.R.R.M mixed the two of them to create the ultimate entitled annoying boy king of all time! That's kinda of an interesting hypothesis that you brought to my mind. Thanks! 😍👑❤
People from Archbishop Sudbury’s home town recovered his spiked head and brought it home. His mummified head is still there, in a cupboard in a church. I enjoy this documentary, though I think just a bit of information about just how important John of Gault was would be have been helpful.
Far too many significant things omitted. Henry of Bolingbroke's father John of Gaunt is barely mentioned. He was the the most powerful noble in England throughout Richard's reign and a huge influence . s proven warrior and politician he was a sophisticated man who was a moderating influence on both Richard and those who opposed him. Unfortunately in the early part of Richard's reign he spent a lot of time in Spain pressing his second wife's claim to the throne of Castile. Not mentioned were John Wycliffe [ translated the bible into English ] and Geoffrey Chaucer the poet. This reflected the fact that English was taking over from French at the top of society. Richard spent the first 7 years of his life in Bordeaux and spoke French as his first langauge. Bolingbroke and even his uncle, Thomas Duke of Gloucester [youngest son of King Edward III ] spoke English as their first language, so Richard came across as favouring the language of the enemy.
When Henry Bolinbroke became King, as Henry IV, he spoke English. Nevertheless Richard II could also speak English as he did during the peasant's revolt. Also there was a cook book written in English written in the King Richard's kitchens. It should be noted that the English at that time is significantly different from Present Day English.
Am reading new bio right now The Red Prince by Helen Carr about John of Gaunt highly recommend it. I was a medieval scholar at university started a Chaucer society. I always appreciated Gaunt's patronage of Chaucer plus his political acumen via his son Henry and his enduring love for Kathryn Swynford. Of course he and she are the ancestors of the controversially legitimized Beaufort clan who for better or worse spawned the Tudors...this history is amazing back when rulers ruled by earning their thrones amidst great dangers. One of the joys of reading Chaucer in Middle English is seeing actual modern English evolve via Norman influence. I can't get enough of this history glad so many people here enjoy it as well!
Same! He resembles the portrait a bit and his face shape and his blondish/ginger hair, the fact that he speaks French, his youthful look, all works out!!
I hope I someday get to visit Britain and see some of these historical locations. It must be Interesting to live in a place with all this Medieval history around on a daily basis! Most of the oldest stuff in America goes back to the 1700s.
Most English citizens are either uninterested in their past or actively rewriting history. Sad to say if not for documentaries like this it would all have been forgotten in time. Hopefully, now the trend has been reversed. Thank you for these excellent documentaries on behalf of future generations.
Reel royalty... Biographics.... Life can't get any better. Y'all made my quarantine the most important time of my life. Thanks guys. The lessons and morals I learned from this.... Absolutely incredible. And to the host. SIMPLY OUTSTANDING. you're vehemence and passion for this is lovely and it shows brother. Appreciate you guys
Personally I think it's more that Richard is a SPOILED BRAT. That is about what happens when you take a teenager who is already a little too spoiled for his own good, and then you give him a serious superiority complex. That is bad enough without throwing a crown into the middle of the whole thing. When you hand him a crown you then have a recipe for FLAT OUT DISASTER. And that's putting it mildly
No Richard wasn't a tyrant. There were a lot less excutions under his rule than most other English kings. He was also not a warmonger like a lot of medieval kings at that time. That's why a lot of the nobility didn't like him. He actually wanted to stop the wars with France, which a lot of the peasants had to pay for. This documentary is basically one sided drivel.
Acting in a foreign language is difficult since part of your brain is focused on translating into that foreign language, yet the actors did a superb job; British actors are my favorite!
John of Gaunt probably gets a worse reputation than he really deserves. By the time he assumed a leading role in the military, the Hundred Years War was already turning against England. John was actually a very brave military leader who performed decently. If anyone deserves blame for the war going badly in the 1370s, its the Black Prince. That Spanish expedition was just foolish and unnecessary.
14 year old boy in Middle Ages: “I save the country dressed in full armor from an enraged mob” 14 years old boy in 2023: my TikTok dance video only has 1000 views 😢
Based on so many of he stories, I feel like the Plantagenets were like their own worst enemies, but then again I suppose a lot of the nobles were the same way.
The Plantagenet's were a very successful dynasty, if you want to know one that was its worst enemy it would have to be the Stuarts. The Stuarts were the most dysfunctional dynasty to ever rule England.
Richard II was first to insist he be called “your highness” - perhaps while sitting on the high chair mentioned here. He was clearly bonkers. Curious that the current lot keep the “highness” title - and the high chair.
Richard could have been a good king if all that power had not gone to his head. It wasn't entirely his fault, though, he had the wrong sort of people around him, stroking his ego.
I'm not saying Richard was a "good" figure, he did do a lot of bad things, but am I crazy to think this narrator really is anti-Richard? Like, he sounds biased, not neutral. Just how it comes across.
To be fair, he never claims not have a bias. On the actual channel that owns this content (this channel just steals other people's docs, changes the titles & jam packs em with ads), they write in the description, that it's "history meets drama". It's the host's theories, on what happened, or why it happened.
@@deborahwhitney9427 if he was in favor of Richard ll, you'd be all in, so his bias isn't the issue. You're all over this comment section, claiming Richard ll was a good leader, who was anti war, blah blah blah. Kind of seems like you're just looking for content that reaffirms what you already believe....🤔
Every noble monarchy began as the most successful gangsters. It's all violence and bling. I also wonder if history is best characterised as a succession of people designing ever sillier hats.
If Richard had killed Henry when had he the chance, who knows maybe the wars of the Rose's would have not even taken place, one stupid silly mistake plunged the nation into a civil war
Watching these videos close to the American 2020 presidential election helps with the despair. England is truly a great country... England survived mentally unstable, cruel tyrants. We'll see the other side of this terrible time. ::sigh::
After watching this again I wonder why they never mention what Richard II's other uncles, John of Gaunt (Founder of House Lancaster) and Edmund of Langley ( Founder of House York), were doing all during Richard II' reign? They said that their youngest brother Thomas Duke of Gloucester was responsible for giving Richard II the news about getting rid of his friends and was one of the 5 lords(also including Henry Bolinbroke who was John of Gaunts oldest son) that confronted Richard II but in the end decided to let him keep the crown, but where were they while all this was happening? Then when Henry Bolingbroke had enough of Richard II's tyranny after Richard II stripped his inheritance that he was supposed to receive after the death of his father, John of Gaunt, and invaded and took the crown, Richard II had actually left his uncle Edmund of Langley in charge of the realm, while he was campaigning in Ireland. So obviously Richard II must have trusted his uncle Edmund of Langley a great deal to leave him in charge so I'm surprised that this video said absolutely nothing about him?
Can you imagine never saying No to a kid and letting them believe that they can’t do anything wrong and they have complete and total control over everything including life and death. They are told they are better than everyone and they saw their parents act in the same way. Then when they are still a tween they become absolute ruler of a country... There aren’t many kids who wouldn’t be corrupted.
Yeah, because a child having access to an abundance of wealth, servants, & power over his subjects, couldn't possibly end badly, without meddling adults 🥴
Technically the Plantagenet dynasty didn't end until the Tudors (1485) as both the houses of Lancaster and York were descendants of Edward III and so Plantagenet's themselves.
Very interesting that Shakespeare chose to make Hotspur "of an age" with Henry of Monmouth (Henry V) rather than Henry of Bolingbroke and Richard of Bordeaux, when the three of them were knighted together by Edward III. I do love the Netflix version and the Kenneth Branaugh version, but there was more than enough drama in the real history!
This doco: The peasants' revolt of 1381 was "the greatest crisis the country had faced in more than 100 years." The Black Death of 1348-9: ARE YOU FUCKEN KIDDING ME??? I killed half the population! And *led to* the peasant's revolt!... Not to imply that the peasants' revolt wasn't a significant event; it was. And I liked that this busted the "brave boy king faces the bloodthirsty mob" myth, & covered the AWFUL slaughter he & his councillors inflicted on the people afterwards.
What is not mentioned is that the so-called 'Peasant's Revolt' was in fact a national rebellion against feudalism. Most of the leaders of the revolt were merchants and burgesses. The rebellion was successful, with the young king agreeing to abolish the aristocracy and distribute their lands to the people that lived and worked on them. (The exact same thing happened in the Portugeuese Revolution of 1976.) After the royal bulls were written, signed and sealed, the leaders of the rebellion (who made the mistake of trusting the king) left London, leaving a contingent of scribes and lawyers to oversee the implementation of the new constitution, and a security force led by Wat Tyler. Some of the rebels wanted to execute the king but they were overruled by the majority, who still believed kings were appointed by God. But the deal was they would let the king and his immediate family live, and continue to reign as king, so long as he honoured his agreements, and obeyed the new ruling government. For a week Richard II was friendly and cooperative with the rebels as they worked on organising elections. However, in the north, John of Gaunt was gathering an army to descend on London and rescue the king. And the king persuaded the rebels to come to a meeting in Smithfield, with both parties attending unarmed, to demonstrate their mutual trust. So, when they met, the rebels were unarmed. But the king's retinue had swords hidden under their cloaks. The head of the security force, Wat Tyler, was fatally wounded, other democrats were killed and for several days London was in chaos. But before the rebel army had time to re-form, John of Gaunt and his mercenaries arrived and took the city. For ten years after this, the King's troops visited every town and village in England, slaughtering dissidents to teach the people to never again challenge the power of the ruling class.
What a load of fanciful nonsense. The leaders of the rebels were peasants and priests not merchants and burgesses. At no time did the King agree to abolish the aristocracy and redistribute all their land..The rebels did not capture the King. Wat Tyler was not head of any “security”force, he was the leader of the rebels. There was no royal bull because a “bull” is issued by the Pope not a King. After the first meeting they did not leave.......
Great documentaries but why don‘t you put even more commercials in between?! Then it would be a TV commercial interrupted by a documentary ... Incredibly annoying!
@@goldbergshekelwitz1596 yup....just swipe until the very end, & then hit replay. Voila, no ads. This is stolen content anyways, so they shouldn't profit off of it anyways.
the historical propaganda of the Tudors has made it seem so. even Shakespeare was in on the revisionism; had to please his masters, you see. the reality is nuch more complicated.
Wat Tyler was drunk when he came to see the king, its was a real insult to the king, so his men acted in haste and struck him down. The rest is history
Not sure about depicting Wat Tyler as a Communist. A lot of the aspects seem closer to radicalism. The freedom to choose an employer and an end to serfdom, and equallity under the law. It is unclear what model the sought for land ownershop though, and it does not seem that there was a support of homesteads, as would be typical of 29th century radicals.
In Germany, they also had a peasants war or revolt in the 16th century. Martin Luther wrote the german nobles that they needed to put the revolt down which they did. he had apparently no sympathy for them.
We tend to underestimate the influence of the Queen, Wife, loved by her King, her husband. Few give consideration to Clementine Churchill for example. Richard’s moral compass was lost when his Queen died.
![[FULL EP.16] เซียนพาลุย "เผือก-ฟรอยด์" กรี๊ดลั่น จนปูหนี | เฮ็ดอย่างเซียนหรั่ง | One Playground](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FsqUvwS3b-Y/mqdefault.jpg)
Can we just admire the fact these actors are speaking french , which is probably the most accurate thing I’ve seen - I’m impressed
french- the aristocratic language
yes I agree, I as an Englishman am proud of our Anglo-Norman roots!!
@@ce1834 As an English woman who voted to rid Britain of the EU Govt, I'm proud of my French, Irish, Scottish, Norwegian roots.
actually im prettysurprised, i had no idea that at some point in british history people spoke french, not english
@@TheGinajaja Royals back then spoke French bc they were French. We haven't had an English monarch for 1,000 years!
I'm no expert but only the extremely wealthy had a formal education up until relatively recent times. The average person didn't speak French.
I love reading the comments on these videos to see if others are as fascinated with the history of England and astonished by the fact that there are still ACTUAL documents and even clothes that these royals wrote with their own hand or wore on their bodies have been so well preserved for 400,500,600 years!! Its amazing!
It’s exhilarating
I love English history
Same, it is fascinating
The English are second to none in the preservation of their history. Not even the other states within the United Kingdom have half the enthusiasm for telling their story.
@@BurlapJohnW Second to none? Lol, the English can't hold a candle to the Romans in this regard.
"Sire, the peasants are revolting"
Richard II: **sigh** "I couldn't have put it better myself. "
The old ones are the best. 😊
LMBO...
Sounds like it could be louis XVI
Also Richard II: *Gets assassinated by same revolvers*
“It’s hard to put a leash on a dog once you’ve put a crown on its head.”
- Tyrion Lannister
That was a awesome quote that could apply to real history.
Be safe and be 😎
Mlm
Yes. Nice quote
Tyrion Lannister.... Quite the prophet.... He drinks and he knows things.... Love it.
My dogs would probably object more to the crown
Fine job by the actor playing Richard II. These guys should be in movies already.
Agreed
"Anyone who must say he's a king is no true king."
Tywin Lannister
It’s “Any man who must say I am the king is no true king.”
Nothing like misquoting, a famous quote 🥴
That is a powerful statement. Your action should precede your words.
Grandfather: Edward III known as one of the greatest King in the history of England.
Father: Edward Prince of Wale better known as the Black Prince
, one of the greatest knights in the history of England.
Then there comes Richard II ... known as one of the greatest if not the greatest Tyrannical King of England.
Seriously what the hell is wrong with this kid? how can he not inherit even an ounce of his father or grandfather's good trait? WTF?
How do you think King Richard II's requirement to travelers affect travelling today?
He was given the pressure at age 10. Edward III had at least one parent with him until he grew up. The black prince had his dad with him his whole life. Losing your parents at grandparents at age 10 and then being given the pressure of a whole country does things to people.
The host is my favorite dude
Dan Jones' books are a great read with a cuppa during these lockdowns
Not a good presenter as a historian. You should seek better.
@@TheCandiceWang LOL! I’m alright, thanks 😊
@@judymac2590 and the kids were going Tyrion not no on o jOhio
me too hey
The Plantagenets went through more drama than Game of Thrones
I have watched all these Episodes: One day you are on top, next day your head is flying.
Yep, and they are very proud of it. 🙄🙄
Lol exactly. Hate & Envy are a hell of a drug! 🤭
The same people who cheered at the coronation are the people who jeer at the beheading.
@@wernerbarnard As they say, people's opinions change with the wind. How quickly they forget.
Actor playing Richard is Cezar Grumăzescu, a Romanian actor!
Who is playing Henry
I feel really sorry for Richard for losing Anne, he may not have been a pleasant king, but at least he loved his wife.
And his second wife.
Many kings did. Henry 1. Henry 2. Richard 1....Henry 8....Edward 7.
(I'm naming all the terrible husband's and adulterers)
Fr tho many did. Harold the 1st the English hero and his wife "swanneck" was a love match. Edward 1 was messed up when his wife died the crosses he erected still stand. Richard the 3rd grew up with his wife. Even the usurper Henry 7 was said to be happy with Elizabeth York. Eddy 4 and the white queen. Eddy 8 gave up the crown for his wife.
Richard II was the real life Joffrey...
Oh for sure. 💯
Martin based Joffrey on Richard
@@bensonfang1868 yes, I know... That's kinda the point of my comment 😅
I kinda think Joffrey was based on Edward of Lancaster - son of Margaret of anjou and henry vi cause after seeing his mockumentary I am convinced that Joffrey is worse than Richard ii,
if Richard ii was anything like Joffrey than he would not been able to crush the peasants revolt, wouldn't have been loved by anne of bohemia , have two successful campaigns in Ireland, wouldn't have been shown Mercy by the lords appellant in 1388, and definitely would been have killed as a teenager.
@@balajinathan6713 OMG I was not expecting that 😂 I'm actually laughing so hard 😂
You do have a really good point, I'm laughing because I wasn't ready for the "Joffrey is worse than Richard II", that was a great twist! 😂
But yeah, you do have a really good point. Perhaps G.R.R.M mixed the two of them to create the ultimate entitled annoying boy king of all time! That's kinda of an interesting hypothesis that you brought to my mind. Thanks! 😍👑❤
Richard of course suffered from the same disease that kings and queens before and after him suffered from... the god complex
People from Archbishop Sudbury’s home town recovered his spiked head and brought it home. His mummified head is still there, in a cupboard in a church.
I enjoy this documentary, though I think just a bit of information about just how important John of Gault was would be have been helpful.
You mean like the video they put out two months previous to this
I know just what you mean! The priest at my church likes to keep mummified heads in the cupboard - right next to the hot chocolate mix.
John of Gaunt, to be precise.
Far too many significant things omitted. Henry of Bolingbroke's father John of Gaunt is barely mentioned. He was the the most powerful noble in England throughout Richard's reign and a huge influence . s proven warrior and politician he was a sophisticated man who was a moderating influence on both Richard and those who opposed him. Unfortunately in the early part of Richard's reign he spent a lot of time in Spain pressing his second wife's claim to the throne of Castile. Not mentioned were John Wycliffe [ translated the bible into English ] and Geoffrey Chaucer the poet. This reflected the fact that English was taking over from French at the top of society. Richard spent the first 7 years of his life in Bordeaux and spoke French as his first langauge. Bolingbroke and even his uncle, Thomas Duke of Gloucester [youngest son of King Edward III ] spoke English as their first language, so Richard came across as favouring the language of the enemy.
You’re right but there’s only so much that can be covered in 45 minute episodes
When Henry Bolinbroke became King, as Henry IV, he spoke English. Nevertheless Richard II could also speak English as he did during the peasant's revolt. Also there was a cook book written in English written in the King Richard's kitchens. It should be noted that the English at that time is significantly different from Present Day English.
@@clivegoodman16 true during this time middle English was spoken by the commoners and middle English was quite different from modern English
Thank you!
Am reading new bio right now The Red Prince by Helen Carr about John of Gaunt highly recommend it. I was a medieval scholar at university started a Chaucer society. I always appreciated Gaunt's patronage of Chaucer plus his political acumen via his son Henry and his enduring love for Kathryn Swynford. Of course he and she are the ancestors of the controversially legitimized Beaufort clan who for better or worse spawned the Tudors...this history is amazing back when rulers ruled by earning their thrones amidst great dangers. One of the joys of reading Chaucer in Middle English is seeing actual modern English evolve via Norman influence. I can't get enough of this history glad so many people here enjoy it as well!
Does anyone know the actor playing Richard II in this? He does an incredible job portraying him.
I totally agree
Same! He resembles the portrait a bit and his face shape and his blondish/ginger hair, the fact that he speaks French, his youthful look, all works out!!
@AgingPeak Thank you! 😃
@@josefienmatu I
I hope I someday get to visit Britain and see some of these historical locations. It must be Interesting to live in a place with all this Medieval history around on a daily basis! Most of the oldest stuff in America goes back to the 1700s.
Most English citizens are either uninterested in their past or actively rewriting history. Sad to say if not for documentaries like this it would all have been forgotten in time. Hopefully, now the trend has been reversed. Thank you for these excellent documentaries on behalf of future generations.
Wat Tyler was praised in the Soviet textbooks on European history among the first forerunners of the Communist ideas. He was 40 when killed.
Reel royalty... Biographics.... Life can't get any better.
Y'all made my quarantine the most important time of my life. Thanks guys. The lessons and morals I learned from this.... Absolutely incredible.
And to the host. SIMPLY OUTSTANDING. you're vehemence and passion for this is lovely and it shows brother.
Appreciate you guys
It's safe to say that This character is where the inspiration for Joffrey Lanister comes from.
War of the Roses: *Super Bloody*
Richard II: *Hold my Crown*
what you mean, Richard set the example XD
jj Stewart did you see what the guy claimed?..
jj Stewart read it^
@@arborscout No. The War of the Roses is an actual historical event.
Me at 14 my only problem is where my crush at school whereabouts. 😂
I never realised Richard II was such a tyrant.
I didn't realize that either. I thought that Henry VIII was the most tyrannical king England ever had, but I guess Richard II wins that coveted award!
i think he had a screw lose
It's all about how you spin it. Personally, I think if he were really a such ruthless tyrant, he would have just killed them all.
Personally I think it's more that Richard is a SPOILED BRAT. That is about what happens when you take a teenager who is already a little too spoiled for his own good, and then you give him a serious superiority complex. That is bad enough without throwing a crown into the middle of the whole thing. When you hand him a crown you then have a recipe for FLAT OUT DISASTER. And that's putting it mildly
No Richard wasn't a tyrant. There were a lot less excutions under his rule than most other English kings. He was also not a warmonger like a lot of medieval kings at that time. That's why a lot of the nobility didn't like him. He actually wanted to stop the wars with France, which a lot of the peasants had to pay for. This documentary is basically one sided drivel.
Acting in a foreign language is difficult since part of your brain is focused on translating into that foreign language, yet the actors did a superb job; British actors are my favorite!
10:30 But he still spoke to them in English. This certainly was an act of strategic thoughtfulness - instead of extraordinary self-confidence.
John of Gaunt probably gets a worse reputation than he really deserves. By the time he assumed a leading role in the military, the Hundred Years War was already turning against England. John was actually a very brave military leader who performed decently. If anyone deserves blame for the war going badly in the 1370s, its the Black Prince. That Spanish expedition was just foolish and unnecessary.
How do you think King Richard II's requirement to travelers affect travelling today?
I'm starting to think that maybe Henrys and Richards are destined to hate each other
"How do you fix a problem like that? Well, you kill them, obviously." Touché. That is how you deal with greedy, oppressive bastards.
i cannot get enough of his videos.
I wonder what would have happened if richard ii had a son with his 1st wife "Anne of bohemia" before he was deposed?
Incredibly informative with a very good presenter.
How cool reading about these things ,then getting a fully choreographed video on the same subject
One of the best narrators going today.
14 year old boy in Middle Ages: “I save the country dressed in full armor from an enraged mob”
14 years old boy in 2023: my TikTok dance video only has 1000 views 😢
Based on so many of he stories, I feel like the Plantagenets were like their own worst enemies, but then again I suppose a lot of the nobles were the same way.
The Plantagenet's were a very successful dynasty, if you want to know one that was its worst enemy it would have to be the Stuarts. The Stuarts were the most dysfunctional dynasty to ever rule England.
Gotta love his sense of revenge.... served it really cold 😂
"After all they are cousins.” Yes because cousins were ever so loyal back in medieval times.
I don't care what he did- I would get my cousin a Gatorade in the Tower ⚰️🛐🤴👑🏴
The Whether Girl Just one more relation to get out of the way.
Hunter D And just about all the kings who ever existed...
Kaiser Wilhelm II was Queen Victoria's grandson lol
Richard II was first to insist he be called “your highness” - perhaps while sitting on the high chair mentioned here. He was clearly bonkers.
Curious that the current lot keep the “highness” title - and the high chair.
That was very helpful , thank you so much!!
Richard could have been a good king if all that power had not gone to his head. It wasn't entirely his fault, though, he had the wrong sort of people around him, stroking his ego.
I wanna know who played Richard in the acting scenes >.>
I'm not saying Richard was a "good" figure, he did do a lot of bad things, but am I crazy to think this narrator really is anti-Richard? Like, he sounds biased, not neutral. Just how it comes across.
I was thinking the same.
To be fair, he never claims not have a bias. On the actual channel that owns this content (this channel just steals other people's docs, changes the titles & jam packs em with ads), they write in the description, that it's "history meets drama". It's the host's theories, on what happened, or why it happened.
@@sese6227 that's quite interesting, I hadn't known that.
@@deborahwhitney9427 if he was in favor of Richard ll, you'd be all in, so his bias isn't the issue. You're all over this comment section, claiming Richard ll was a good leader, who was anti war, blah blah blah. Kind of seems like you're just looking for content that reaffirms what you already believe....🤔
Seeing the way richard treated his country and nobles. Yea he wasnt a good king.
Every noble monarchy began as the most successful gangsters. It's all violence and bling.
I also wonder if history is best characterised as a succession of people designing ever sillier hats.
If Richard had killed Henry when had he the chance, who knows maybe the wars of the Rose's would have not even taken place, one stupid silly mistake plunged the nation into a civil war
I like how everyone opens the Parliament's doors like how cowboys open saloon doors in movies.
That's because the medieval men learnd it from them there cowboys.
😃😆😉
Richard the 2nd is one of my favorite kings.
Same thing for me.😊😊😊😊
Tournaments were the ultimate spectator sport - I wouldn’t have wanted to be there, myself. Pretty bloody.
It's fascinating how there are parallels to so many different Asoiaf characters in just one man.
Almost like martin used history to write realistic intriguing characters
I'm watching GoT at the moment and there's 2-3 historical references from various periods in every episode and it's really funny to spot them out.
So, is Little Dick the model for Joffre from GoT?
I think he might be George rr Martin did say he took inspiration from the wars of the Rose's
He was based on Edward of Lancaster better known as Edward of Westminister
Salvatore is right. The main inspiration is Edward
Hes based mainly on edward of lancaster and minorly on richard 2nd
@Simon England - Exactly.
Completely exciting and nothing like my history classes in a new Zealand Hight School, many years ago, but still in the time of QE11.
Watching these videos close to the American 2020 presidential election helps with the despair. England is truly a great country... England survived mentally unstable, cruel tyrants. We'll see the other side of this terrible time.
::sigh::
"Not to be loved, enough to be feared" (attributed to Caligula or Nero).
"I want to show Richard as he really was ... " Cue mood music and over-acting ! (Come back, Richard Starkey, all is forgiven)
The hosts voice makes me listen over and over
After watching this again I wonder why they never mention what Richard II's other uncles, John of Gaunt (Founder of House Lancaster) and Edmund of Langley ( Founder of House York), were doing all during Richard II' reign? They said that their youngest brother Thomas Duke of Gloucester was responsible for giving Richard II the news about getting rid of his friends and was one of the 5 lords(also including Henry Bolinbroke who was John of Gaunts oldest son) that confronted Richard II but in the end decided to let him keep the crown, but where were they while all this was happening? Then when Henry Bolingbroke had enough of Richard II's tyranny after Richard II stripped his inheritance that he was supposed to receive after the death of his father, John of Gaunt, and invaded and took the crown, Richard II had actually left his uncle Edmund of Langley in charge of the realm, while he was campaigning in Ireland. So obviously Richard II must have trusted his uncle Edmund of Langley a great deal to leave him in charge so I'm surprised that this video said absolutely nothing about him?
A "ruthless tyrant" would have killed them all outright.
I think i saw a documentary in between the ad's 🤣
Wow.. Amazing documentary. No wonder I didn't understand what they were saying, I don't speak French haha
GREAT documentary!!!!!
Humm? Why is it that a child who rules always ends up being Brutal?? Other voices must be to blame.
Because kids are reckless and cruel. That's why they need to be civilized, I mean, educated.
Can you imagine never saying No to a kid and letting them believe that they can’t do anything wrong and they have complete and total control over everything including life and death. They are told they are better than everyone and they saw their parents act in the same way. Then when they are still a tween they become absolute ruler of a country... There aren’t many kids who wouldn’t be corrupted.
Yeah, because a child having access to an abundance of wealth, servants, & power over his subjects, couldn't possibly end badly, without meddling adults 🥴
No. Child is to blame.
loved this thank you 👏👏👏👏🎄🎄🎄
Technically the Plantagenet dynasty didn't end until the Tudors (1485) as both the houses of Lancaster and York were descendants of Edward III and so Plantagenet's themselves.
Finally, a video of yours where the music doesn’t drown out the speaker.
New subscriber here from Florida, USA. I love this channel!!!
It's a temper tantrum... Love it!
I always admired Richard II reign. Imagine being in the 1300s!
to compare this chanel whit Netflix is just profoundly insulting this is WAY better than Netflix HBO and all of them combined that is simply amazing
Very well narrated
Well done. Succinct but all the highlights are done.
Very interesting that Shakespeare chose to make Hotspur "of an age" with Henry of Monmouth (Henry V) rather than Henry of Bolingbroke and Richard of Bordeaux, when the three of them were knighted together by Edward III. I do love the Netflix version and the Kenneth Branaugh version, but there was more than enough drama in the real history!
very good review of amazingly interesting, disturbing hiStory
This doco: The peasants' revolt of 1381 was "the greatest crisis the country had faced in more than 100 years."
The Black Death of 1348-9: ARE YOU FUCKEN KIDDING ME??? I killed half the population! And *led to* the peasant's revolt!...
Not to imply that the peasants' revolt wasn't a significant event; it was. And I liked that this busted the "brave boy king faces the bloodthirsty mob" myth, & covered the AWFUL slaughter he & his councillors inflicted on the people afterwards.
Oh how the mighty have fallen. Pride goes before a major fall.
What is not mentioned is that the so-called 'Peasant's Revolt' was in fact a national rebellion against feudalism. Most of the leaders of the revolt were merchants and burgesses. The rebellion was successful, with the young king agreeing to abolish the aristocracy and distribute their lands to the people that lived and worked on them. (The exact same thing happened in the Portugeuese Revolution of 1976.) After the royal bulls were written, signed and sealed, the leaders of the rebellion (who made the mistake of trusting the king) left London, leaving a contingent of scribes and lawyers to oversee the implementation of the new constitution, and a security force led by Wat Tyler. Some of the rebels wanted to execute the king but they were overruled by the majority, who still believed kings were appointed by God. But the deal was they would let the king and his immediate family live, and continue to reign as king, so long as he honoured his agreements, and obeyed the new ruling government. For a week Richard II was friendly and cooperative with the rebels as they worked on organising elections. However, in the north, John of Gaunt was gathering an army to descend on London and rescue the king. And the king persuaded the rebels to come to a meeting in Smithfield, with both parties attending unarmed, to demonstrate their mutual trust. So, when they met, the rebels were unarmed. But the king's retinue had swords hidden under their cloaks. The head of the security force, Wat Tyler, was fatally wounded, other democrats were killed and for several days London was in chaos. But before the rebel army had time to re-form, John of Gaunt and his mercenaries arrived and took the city. For ten years after this, the King's troops visited every town and village in England, slaughtering dissidents to teach the people to never again challenge the power of the ruling class.
Very interesting. Thank you
What a load of fanciful nonsense. The leaders of the rebels were peasants and priests not merchants and burgesses. At no time did the King agree to abolish the aristocracy and redistribute all their land..The rebels did not capture the King. Wat Tyler was not head of any “security”force, he was the leader of the rebels. There was no royal bull because a “bull” is issued by the Pope not a King. After the first meeting they did not leave.......
The revolt came after the black plaque
@@FredBTs yes it was an Ill thought out comment.Bits of it were accurate but mostly it was baloney.
This was hella interesting
Land ownership for the people isn't a bad idea. But heck! This is England
These are very good!
Should be titled "England's Kim Jung Un."
Of Joffrey 😉
@@GosieKin He's too competent for that.
Great documentaries but why don‘t you put even more commercials in between?! Then it would be a TV commercial interrupted by a documentary ... Incredibly annoying!
Keep swiping right to each yellow bit until all gone and then pull it back to the start all ad's will be gone.
@@brianm1978 you can just skip to the last one and restart the video
@@goldbergshekelwitz1596 yup....just swipe until the very end, & then hit replay. Voila, no ads. This is stolen content anyways, so they shouldn't profit off of it anyways.
great documentary thumbs all the way down for the constant ads. left after 7
Well done and told.
My favorite king since I was a child is Richard III. He was such a three-dimensional demon. No other villain can match him.
the historical propaganda of the Tudors has made it seem so. even Shakespeare was in on the revisionism; had to please his masters, you see. the reality is nuch more complicated.
Young Richard II is really cute tho.
I mean the actor 🤭
This is really good but I have never seen so many commercials on TH-cam in my life.
Thanks for the re-upload with a different title from your Timeline channel. I love being baited into thinking it might be new material.
Great storyteller
Joffrey is like, hold my wine
get Ad Blocker no ads at all
Keep your friends close and your enemies closer
Wat Tyler was drunk when he came to see the king, its was a real insult to the king, so his men acted in haste and struck him down. The rest is history
Not sure about depicting Wat Tyler as a Communist. A lot of the aspects seem closer to radicalism. The freedom to choose an employer and an end to serfdom, and equallity under the law. It is unclear what model the sought for land ownershop though, and it does not seem that there was a support of homesteads, as would be typical of 29th century radicals.
In Germany, they also had a peasants war or revolt in the 16th century. Martin Luther wrote the german nobles that they needed to put the revolt down which they did. he had apparently no sympathy for them.
incredible quantity of adverts (otherwise great..)
The Plantagenets had hereditary mental health issues.
We tend to underestimate the influence of the Queen, Wife, loved by her King, her husband. Few give consideration to Clementine Churchill for example. Richard’s moral compass was lost when his Queen died.
“De Vere, Richard’s best pal,”
Odd way to say “boyfriend” but okay
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_de_Vere,_Duke_of_Ireland
richard was 6'1
Wow, this guy was brutal! I like it
fear turns into anger
Anger turns into hate
Hate turns into hate
Damn…. You guys are pretty greedy. How about being a little reasonable with the adds.
It's stolen content.... they're a trash channel.