Post Flood the so-called ice age occured lowering sea levels 130 meters about 2000 B.C.E. Great temples were built honoring the Ark and the mountain of it's landing. This is why temples are built on mounts so often. The first temple based on this thought is at Babel. The base is still there.
Why is this not front page of all channels ? It means we have to rewrite completely our history and drop to the bin all history manuals....yet nobody is really talking about it..why ??
@@aff3ction thats not an historian job to answer..a geologist is waranted,the question here is natural or artificial..beside its just logical that stairs and 90 degres angles are not created naturaly. You heard of 1000 tons megalith stones transported for hundreds of miles and lifted 10 feets above the ground..common its obvious no roman,no greek, no egyptian ,no babylonian did that..we hardly could today..
@@anchorpoint5871 Are these just your day-dreaming theories that you've canonized as reality? Go read some research about how ancient civilizations built their monoliths (it's more understood than you seem to think). It's not so unbelievable when you account for how long it took them to build these things. On the other hand, even in this video it's mentioned that the features of Yonaguni Monument are consistent with the surface and consistent with other goelogical features of the area, which you would discover if you decided to actually research what you talk about instead of relying on your own random knowledge.
Uh Yonaguni is not some new discovery, I remember reading and watching TV shows about it back in the early 2000s in high school and its original discovery dates back to the 1980s. Right now the scientific consensus is that these are, as striking as they may appear, naturally-formed geological formation especially once you observe the surrounding geological formations. So unless some compelling new evidence are presented that demonstrate these are man-made, then it would hardly qualify for front page news.
The rocks could be natural, but that doesn't mean man didn't carve them flatter and cut stairways. A few of the above water formations may of been shaped too, though the stone may of remained in place or did not move far. Like saying mount Rushmore is a mountain, no one built it, it just looks like faces, and that's correct, but built and carved are very different things.
It would be more surprising not finding lost cities of Japan. More and more underwater settlements have been found each passing year. Human history outside Africa now dates back almost 400k years. We know nothing. The formations on land don't show numerous staircase futures. This one shows many of them. I don't know that it's man-made but dismissing that idea seems sill just because there are flat rocks also on land.
yes. the rockformations above sea level also dont have nearly the same amount of symmetry. its pretty obviously an old quarry. sea levels used to be far lower.
@@TonyTrupp I don't know if you say this as a result of having the knowledge of an examination on these rocks but it's hard to find evidences after all those years and erosion. I made just a guess. I can't insist on it.
There are plenty of straight lines in nature however I've never seen or heard of stairs or same height width step formations. Has the area been mapped, seems an obvious "step" to make.
Yeah that's what I was thinking. It has the typical look of a quarry but these people like to jump to conclusions about ancient temples, aliens and other bullcrap.
this could be an ancient quarry. it looks very similar to ones in Egypt, so man made but not a temple or city ruins. it would explain why one side is more chopped up then the other. if it is a quarry, where are the stones it provided????
After seeing what happened recently in the noto region of japan due to the 7.6 earthquake. That raised the sea floor 13 feet and exposed nearly 850 feet of new beaches along the coast and how active the area is.. I believe that underwater structure was once part of the natural landscape, fell into the ocean after a major earthquake. There has to be evidence of a major tsunami happening that can’t be explained because of it.
Perhaps some group near the end of the Ice Age carved out these structures. During the Ice Age, the ocean was on average about 300 feet shallower than it is today. The Yonaguni Monument is about 100ft underwater.
Good point. You are forgetting about the Younger Dryas impact about 13K years ago. The Global ccean levels were shifted about 300*400 ft. Which would haved made this site a coastal beach palace. The Berullium-10 dating method used for quoting the age of this structure to about 3000 years ago is flawed. Granite is a hard, crystalline rock that is relatively resistant to weathering and chemical alteration. However, even granite can be affected by long-term submersion in ionized salt water. Here's how the Beryllium-10 (10Be) levels might be affected: Leaching: While granite is less porous than many other rock types, it's not completely impervious to water. Over thousands of years, ionized salt water could potentially leach some 10Be out of the granite. Shielding from Cosmic Rays: As mentioned earlier, while the granite is submerged, it would be shielded from cosmic rays, which are the source of atmospheric 10Be. This would prevent any additional 10Be from being added to the granite during the time it is submerged. Decay: 10Be is radioactive and decays with a half-life of about 1.4 million years. Over a few thousand years, a small amount of the 10Be in the granite would decay, but this effect would be relatively minor compared to the effects of leaching and shielding. Physical Erosion: Depending on the conditions, physical erosion could also play a role. If the granite is in an environment with strong currents or abrasive sediment, it could be physically worn down over time, which could remove surface layers containing 10Be. While granite is relatively resistant to leaching and erosion, long-term submersion in ionized salt water could still potentially affect the 10Be concentration in the granite. This could make the granite appear YOUNGER than it actually is when dated using 10Be.
hi have dived this site about 12 years ago the place is amazing the currents might strong though you swim through the tunnel and come up on to the flat part then to the steps amazing
Maybe these scientists have forgotten how artists work. You have naturally created structures that you use to make man made structures. eg. Khasneh (´Treasury´) at Petra. Jordan, Leshan Giant Buddha in China, Kailasa Temple in India, Lalibela in Ethiopia, Abu Simbel in Egypt etc It’s so obvious. The Japanese can’t be the only advanced culture without monolithic structures made from natural formations. And tool markings etc would have been washed away if this thing was made in 300 CE
There’s no confirmation that any of those places are truly carved out of the natural formations, that’s just a hypothesis put forward by some researchers, with no evidence other than the fact that it appears to be a singular piece. When looking closer at many of the places you listed and comparing them to actual architecture worldwide, you see that the style of building is the same, down to the patterns in the ceilings at certain points. Look at any of those places with the idea that something happened to fuse everything together and it will make infinitely more sense to you.
i think it's similar to neolithic temples found in thailand and indonesia, but underwater. these temples are heavily influenced by buddhism. which is common religion in japan. actually it's make sense than trying to connect this archeological site to the "Atlantis"
Its a quarry. The sea level was lower when that thing was in use. Its not mind blowing, these are around the world. There was a bad flood and the sea level rose. Many coastal cities went under. People are so daft to force themselves to think this is natural.
My personality think this is not a natural formation but an artificial one. The area where this topography is located was exposed on the surface in the 13th century, when the Gusuku era began. At that time, many castles were built in the Ryukyu Islands, and a lot of stone was needed. There are many remains of medieval stone quarries in the Ryukyu Islands. I believe these underwater ruins are former stone quarries that sank due to rising sea levels.
@@jamesmcdonald9313 what about the random dude in the comment section who said this ? "Although not shown in the video, there are in fact ruins shaped like a pavilion made of stone and objects like a sphinx lying on its side at this site. The logic of natural formation is absurd"
This reminded me of Coin Locker Babies by Ryu Murakami (not Haruki Murakami). One of the characters searches of a destructive military grade substance under an island near Okinawa.
The way this video is put together seems suspicious. Very fast with writing over much of it that is wanted to be seen clearly. I slowed it down to actually be able to evaluate it at all.
Look at the hexagonal shapes with flat surfaces, on of Coast Ireland. Just because something has geometric shapes with flat surfaces, does not mean that it is man-made. Nature makes geometric shapes all the time.
Not that I know of. I didn't quite catch the datation of the structures in the video though. Depending of the ancient names of the place it is situated in, the foundating myths of the Kojiki and Nihon Shoki are worth reading
All MSM is there to Fake History. Because there Owners depent on the BS History for there Power. With the Truth, all Religions are Falls, all there claims on Lands are falls. One example Egypt, not african not Arab, Whites Build it.
Why just not look on the seabed floor or on formation for any carvings or writing also signs of human activity that was once active at the time and artifacts, instead of just swimming around and looking at the scale of it🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
" "We should also consider the possibility that the Yonaguni Monument is fundamentally a natural structure that was utilized, enhanced, and modified by humans in ancient times."" This video misrepresents what Robert Schoch said about the structure and arguably should be considered a deception, but why?
What is the point of being a Geologist if in today's day and age, they still don't know whether it is man made or natural lol. Notice the regular use of the word "believe" in this short video.
Harder to dismiss, especially when you want to contrast to somewhat symmetrical natural formation in order to make think nature could just happen to accidentally carve gigantic evenly spaced staircases. Not really all that puzzling that BBC chose this footage and not the other one.
Yes that looks like it could be the case here when you look at the whole site. However there are still a lot of questions about other sites around the world. And entertaining the possibility of lost civilizations is not a conspiracy theory, who shot JFK ect, is a conspiracy theory. I think you are a little confused.
its funny because, when something is not clearly man mande, they say is man made, but when something is super clearly man made, like the giza pyramids, it obviusly made by aliens xD
@@torino320 I prefer previous age of humanity. As described by many our earliest civilizations themselves. Is that is conspiracy theory, then color me bad. 😱
@@torino320 so you are saying that Egyptians built great pyramid? I don't believe in aliens but I belive in industrial civilization more than 15.000ya ago..
@@arcguardianthe “experts” pretty much said ”the joints in the rock, are natural, though we have no idea how they form, and we dismiss any other possibility for fear that we might be wrong.”
It's probably a combination of both. Like the sphinx, when these rock formations weren't submerged, how could people NOT have taken advantage of these convenient platforms?
Because the academics can’t admit we aren’t the most evolved most technologically advanced we’ve ever been. It would hurt their world view. People in these fields no longer care about doing research or science, they care about protecting the official narrative at all costs.
@@armadillo9961 - I've watched a couple of videos and pictures of this site. The camera footage does not at all make it clear but when you see models and drawings of the who'e thing that's another story. This looks like a quarry to me but it may have been anything. That's what nobody can know anymore. But what is obvious especially from models and drawings is that this is a structure that was built / shaped by somebody. Whereas I stand corrected insofar as the oc may indeed be correct if this was a quarry. Because that would have originally been a natural structure altered by people.
@@saymyname2417Agreed it looks manmade especially when you consider there are apparently many more along the coastline for about 4 miles. Quarry makes sense too, and it also resembles the ziggurat
That interviewee who mention someone else who believe that was man-made without any scientific research just straight up killing that person's scientific career
Rare Earth channel had visited the island and debunked it. It's just simply a natural rock formations wihout any human touch. But the locals keep the legend/myth alive since that's the reason for the curious divers around the world will visit the place. It's all about locals' economy from the tourism.
Bad editing, had to make a choice between reading the subtitle or watching the sceneic video, the scenes were also changing too fast like a slide show. Would have preferred if they switched between showing a full-screen text overlapping the blurred video to give context and then just stick to showing just the video without any distractions.
The Bible said in Genesis, after Cain killed Abel, he was sent away by our great creator and he traveled until he reached the land of Nod and there he was married, when we had civilization and he had of five generations. Cain's parents, Adam and Eve, left the Garden of Eden after they sinned. and it was said in Genesis that Cain and Abel's father is different even though Eve conceived the same father. Maybe what you see is Cain's civilization slowly sinking into the sea, but before it sank, it was said in Genesis that the great creator sent a flood to the world, this is Noah's time to clean up the evil of mankind, Cain's civilization is referred to as will be erased because their wickedness is too much.
Maybe both? Like carve stairs & walls in natural cliffs? So back when sea levels were lower, maybe people adjusted the natural formation to suit them? But like if you can't grasp straight lines in nature, look up Giant's causeway in northern Ireland!
Giant humans used to roam the Earth they built giant structures made out of stone and granite pure carving and heat thermal pressure and laser water pressure . Giant humans went extinction
Come on. Its bad when scientists go i think it's natural cause theres so much thats similar then show stuff that isnt that similar. One i want a factual explanation why it is or isn't man made, and i wanna see these formations that they say are so similar.
Is this a sick-unfunny joke? When he says "However, this can simply be explained by looking at other naturally formed landscapes which are similar to this." He provides no such examples!!!!
I guest people are still in denial about life here way before us and we'll never know what or who.... we can't ever be honest and say , yes, someone did this but we don't know who. We can't have the answer to everything. People aren't that dumb to think the water made that naturally. These people need another job if they really trying to convince someone of that. I love history and we shouldn't hide the truth
@@aerisgainsborough2141- Computer simulations... are you THAT daft 😱?! Nothing has been debunked. Because it cannot be debunked. There are flood myths from all over the world and the vast majority has the always same characteristics. And there are artefacts like this. But whatever physical or geological proof may have existed is usually long gone. Science is unable to prove or disprove anything in this regard. Isn't that obvious?!
@aerisgainsborough2141 Cataclysmic events during the flood and for hundreds of years as a result thereafter caused rapid changes. The flood represents massive, extremely powerful, and very rapid events.
![Tsunami, 10 Years in the Rebuilding of a Town from Zero, Rikuzentakata, Japan Earthquake [Eng Subs]](/img/n.gif)
Always best to remember that sea levels were 120 metres lower during the last glacial maximum.
10,000 years ago
Humans were thought to still be living in caves.
@@SafeEffective-ls2pl except for Gobekli Tepe, then?
Post Flood the so-called ice age occured lowering sea levels 130 meters about 2000 B.C.E. Great temples were built honoring the Ark and the mountain of it's landing. This is why temples are built on mounts so often. The first temple based on this thought is at Babel. The base is still there.
It's all wrong people, the science we learned is almost all wrong. Can't you see?
Why is this not front page of all channels ? It means we have to rewrite completely our history and drop to the bin all history manuals....yet nobody is really talking about it..why ??
Because unlike these amateur divers, most scientists have agreed for a while that it's naturally formed.
@@aff3ction thats not an historian job to answer..a geologist is waranted,the question here is natural or artificial..beside its just logical that stairs and 90 degres angles are not created naturaly. You heard of 1000 tons megalith stones transported for hundreds of miles and lifted 10 feets above the ground..common its obvious no roman,no greek, no egyptian ,no babylonian did that..we hardly could today..
@@anchorpoint5871 Are these just your day-dreaming theories that you've canonized as reality? Go read some research about how ancient civilizations built their monoliths (it's more understood than you seem to think). It's not so unbelievable when you account for how long it took them to build these things. On the other hand, even in this video it's mentioned that the features of Yonaguni Monument are consistent with the surface and consistent with other goelogical features of the area, which you would discover if you decided to actually research what you talk about instead of relying on your own random knowledge.
Uh Yonaguni is not some new discovery, I remember reading and watching TV shows about it back in the early 2000s in high school and its original discovery dates back to the 1980s. Right now the scientific consensus is that these are, as striking as they may appear, naturally-formed geological formation especially once you observe the surrounding geological formations. So unless some compelling new evidence are presented that demonstrate these are man-made, then it would hardly qualify for front page news.
The rocks could be natural, but that doesn't mean man didn't carve them flatter and cut stairways. A few of the above water formations may of been shaped too, though the stone may of remained in place or did not move far. Like saying mount Rushmore is a mountain, no one built it, it just looks like faces, and that's correct, but built and carved are very different things.
how about they they were built on land and sink many many many thousands of yeas ago?
It would be more surprising not finding lost cities of Japan. More and more underwater settlements have been found each passing year. Human history outside Africa now dates back almost 400k years. We know nothing.
The formations on land don't show numerous staircase futures. This one shows many of them. I don't know that it's man-made but dismissing that idea seems sill just because there are flat rocks also on land.
Out of India, backed by DNA look it up
Come on. I don't believe that waves cut corners like that.
And I'm 100% with you on that.
The waves didn’t cut those sharp corners. Rather it was the flat layered geology just fracturing into sharp edges.
Its not formed by the water, look at the above water cliff formation in the nearby terrain, its fracturing of layers.
It looks like a quarry. I have seen old Roman quarries and they look like this. But this looks like bigger.
yes.
the rockformations above sea level also dont have nearly the same amount of symmetry.
its pretty obviously an old quarry.
sea levels used to be far lower.
Makes sense, but now we gotta find what they were using all that stone for 🐒
There are no quarry tooling marks though 🤷♂️
@@TonyTrupp I don't know if you say this as a result of having the knowledge of an examination on these rocks but it's hard to find evidences after all those years and erosion. I made just a guess. I can't insist on it.
With all the debates no one made the assumption that this is not a monument, but a stone quarry.
There are plenty of straight lines in nature however I've never seen or heard of stairs or same height width step formations.
Has the area been mapped, seems an obvious "step" to make.
Could it be that it was a quarry site before in the ancient past?
Yeah that's what I was thinking. It has the typical look of a quarry but these people like to jump to conclusions about ancient temples, aliens and other bullcrap.
There are no quarry tooling marks
this could be an ancient quarry. it looks very similar to ones in Egypt, so man made but not a temple or city ruins. it would explain why one side is more chopped up then the other. if it is a quarry, where are the stones it provided????
これ、発見された当時、結局自然に出来たものと’専門家’が言い張って、未だに自然に出来たもので人口物では無いと言う話に強引になりましたね。
今現在コロナについてテレビに出ている’専門家’がデタラメと言うか特定の利権団体を利する様な事しか言わないのを見ると元々そう言う事だったのが良くわかります。
That was carved from the bedrock just like some of the other ancient sites. That was definitely man-made from the bedrock.
Definitely?
After seeing what happened recently in the noto region of japan due to the 7.6 earthquake. That raised the sea floor 13 feet and exposed nearly 850 feet of new beaches along the coast and how active the area is.. I believe that underwater structure was once part of the natural landscape, fell into the ocean after a major earthquake. There has to be evidence of a major tsunami happening that can’t be explained because of it.
Perhaps some group near the end of the Ice Age carved out these structures. During the Ice Age, the ocean was on average about 300 feet shallower than it is today. The Yonaguni Monument is about 100ft underwater.
Good point. You are forgetting about the Younger Dryas impact about 13K years ago. The Global ccean levels were shifted about 300*400 ft. Which would haved made this site a coastal beach palace.
The Berullium-10 dating method used for quoting the age of this structure to about 3000 years ago is flawed. Granite is a hard, crystalline rock that is relatively resistant to weathering and chemical alteration. However, even granite can be affected by long-term submersion in ionized salt water. Here's how the Beryllium-10 (10Be) levels might be affected:
Leaching: While granite is less porous than many other rock types, it's not completely impervious to water. Over thousands of years, ionized salt water could potentially leach some 10Be out of the granite.
Shielding from Cosmic Rays: As mentioned earlier, while the granite is submerged, it would be shielded from cosmic rays, which are the source of atmospheric 10Be. This would prevent any additional 10Be from being added to the granite during the time it is submerged.
Decay: 10Be is radioactive and decays with a half-life of about 1.4 million years. Over a few thousand years, a small amount of the 10Be in the granite would decay, but this effect would be relatively minor compared to the effects of leaching and shielding.
Physical Erosion: Depending on the conditions, physical erosion could also play a role. If the granite is in an environment with strong currents or abrasive sediment, it could be physically worn down over time, which could remove surface layers containing 10Be.
While granite is relatively resistant to leaching and erosion, long-term submersion in ionized salt water could still potentially affect the 10Be concentration in the granite.
This could make the granite appear YOUNGER than it actually is when dated using 10Be.
No. It would be fantastic but you need more proof to make a claim that is man made.
hi have dived this site about 12 years ago the place is amazing the currents might strong though you swim through the tunnel and come up on to the flat part then to the steps
amazing
what did you think? man made or natural.
That's where Aliens land their space ships.
How is this not talked about more?
japan never stops fascinating guys
Thanks so much for the video and info.
Maybe these scientists have forgotten how artists work. You have naturally created structures that you use to make man made structures. eg. Khasneh (´Treasury´) at Petra. Jordan, Leshan Giant Buddha in China, Kailasa Temple in India, Lalibela in Ethiopia, Abu Simbel in Egypt etc It’s so obvious. The Japanese can’t be the only advanced culture without monolithic structures made from natural formations. And tool markings etc would have been washed away if this thing was made in 300 CE
There’s no confirmation that any of those places are truly carved out of the natural formations, that’s just a hypothesis put forward by some researchers, with no evidence other than the fact that it appears to be a singular piece. When looking closer at many of the places you listed and comparing them to actual architecture worldwide, you see that the style of building is the same, down to the patterns in the ceilings at certain points. Look at any of those places with the idea that something happened to fuse everything together and it will make infinitely more sense to you.
There's no way this is natural.
There's no way this place is naturally formed.
What else could have happened?
i think it's similar to neolithic temples found in thailand and indonesia, but underwater. these temples are heavily influenced by buddhism. which is common religion in japan. actually it's make sense than trying to connect this archeological site to the "Atlantis"
Its a quarry. The sea level was lower when that thing was in use. Its not mind blowing, these are around the world. There was a bad flood and the sea level rose. Many coastal cities went under. People are so daft to force themselves to think this is natural.
Dum
Facts
There were two floods. The Flood of Noah that changed Earth's climate, and the melting of the glaciation caused by the Flood.
Still amazing
My personality think this is not a natural formation but an artificial one. The area where this topography is located was exposed on the surface in the 13th century, when the Gusuku era began. At that time, many castles were built in the Ryukyu Islands, and a lot of stone was needed. There are many remains of medieval stone quarries in the Ryukyu Islands. I believe these underwater ruins are former stone quarries that sank due to rising sea levels.
So the "truth" of these structures is that nobody really knows if they're natural or man made?
no, they pretty much confirmed its natural.
@@jamesmcdonald9313 what about the random dude in the comment section who said this ? "Although not shown in the video, there are in fact ruins shaped like a pavilion made of stone and objects like a sphinx lying on its side at this site. The logic of natural formation is absurd"
@@johankaruyan5536 ah yes, the most reliable source, random guy in the comments.
@johankaruyan5536 to be fair he has said the exact same thing in every video regarding the structure, an exact copy and paste in fact
@@capnjackgallows3204 ok
Have to go see this soon!!!!
I think it’s the same tech used by the Egyptians to cut those stones
Looks like a quarry. Therefore, it looks somehow processed without making sense.
This reminded me of Coin Locker Babies by Ryu Murakami (not Haruki Murakami). One of the characters searches of a destructive military grade substance under an island near Okinawa.
Its not so clear cut, how about a natural structure thats been enhanced and changed by early humans?
Wouldn't a 3D map of sorts give a better clue?
They’re not there yet lol
@@Shlevel 3D sonar?
There is a 3D mapping, look for it.
There’s literally a pyramid with stairs down there why is no one posting that footage on this video ? It’s definitely man made
The way this video is put together seems suspicious. Very fast with writing over much of it that is wanted to be seen clearly. I slowed it down to actually be able to evaluate it at all.
@@kathleennorton7913 that's the BBC for ya!
Look at the hexagonal shapes with flat surfaces, on of Coast Ireland.
Just because something has geometric shapes with flat surfaces, does not mean that it is man-made.
Nature makes geometric shapes all the time.
Not stairs lol
The truth is....TAIWAN HAS BEEN #1 for millennia.
Wow! Only 20 years after Graham Hancock's "Underworld"
Breathtaking structures. Are there any mythological stories or folklore in Japan redarding this place?
Not that I know of. I didn't quite catch the datation of the structures in the video though. Depending of the ancient names of the place it is situated in, the foundating myths of the Kojiki and Nihon Shoki are worth reading
Nope, this thing is naturally formed I’m afraid
Atlantis
I have been reading some opinions said it might be the lost mu civilization
@@bobbelcher678Doesn’t look natural at all, wdym?
Sea levels do rise. I wouldn’t be surprised if there is one.
The Giants' Causeway of Japan
I agree with others that this is most certainly a quarry , it's obvious !
Why quarry there when the whole island is a giant rock?
@@jamescassaniti9694
Is it?
Like the others you are obviously dum then.
Seem like they don't want us to know that it's man made
Why doesn't the BBC report on Europe's various megalithic architecture sites?
All MSM is there to Fake History. Because there Owners depent on the BS History for there Power. With the Truth, all Religions are Falls, all there claims on Lands are falls. One example Egypt, not african not Arab, Whites Build it.
We've all got an Atlantis hidden somewhere deep in our souls
Or another civ that rivaled
Sad world
Almost no footage of it lame AF.
"the truth" provided by the BBC...
Why just not look on the seabed floor or on formation for any carvings or writing also signs of human activity that was once active at the time and artifacts, instead of just swimming around and looking at the scale of it🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
They did and there aren't any.
" "We should also consider the possibility that the Yonaguni Monument is fundamentally a natural structure that was utilized, enhanced, and modified by humans in ancient times.""
This video misrepresents what Robert Schoch said about the structure and arguably should be considered a deception, but why?
What did he actually say?
it's the bbc, wouldn't expect anything else other then misrepresentation and deception
What is the point of being a Geologist if in today's day and age, they still don't know whether it is man made or natural lol. Notice the regular use of the word "believe" in this short video.
So no 'truth' actually appears, just the usual conjecture.
You will never get truth on the apparatus of control known as the TV. Any mass media really.
I don't know why History Channel's "Ancient Aliens" got a better footage of the monument showing the staircases and better angles than BBC lmao...
Harder to dismiss, especially when you want to contrast to somewhat symmetrical natural formation in order to make think nature could just happen to accidentally carve gigantic evenly spaced staircases.
Not really all that puzzling that BBC chose this footage and not the other one.
All natural The first expert that went there noted on the way down to the boat that lots of the above water land mass is the same
Kaimanawa Wall New Zealand would be another great discovery the World would want to see.
Look at the "Millenium Falcon under the Baltic"
It may have been a man made Tomb or outpost, then japan had a massive earthquake and fell into the sea.
I don't know but since it can not be proved that its manmade, it must be natural. So where's the proof that its natural?
Havent you watched the video?
There are similar land formations all around it
The truth is that nobody knows dyck
Aliens did that.
There are similar rock formations which are natural just beside the sea but the conspiracy theorists have to say its man-made 🤷♂️
Yes that looks like it could be the case here when you look at the whole site. However there are still a lot of questions about other sites around the world. And entertaining the possibility of lost civilizations is not a conspiracy theory, who shot JFK ect, is a conspiracy theory. I think you are a little confused.
its funny because, when something is not clearly man mande, they say is man made, but when something is super clearly man made, like the giza pyramids, it obviusly made by aliens xD
@@torino320 I prefer previous age of humanity. As described by many our earliest civilizations themselves. Is that is conspiracy theory, then color me bad. 😱
@@torino320 so you are saying that Egyptians built great pyramid? I don't believe in aliens but I belive in industrial civilization more than 15.000ya ago..
There is nothing even remotely similar beside the sea..can it be a quarry? More than 12.000ya ago?
I would love to see this as an old, man made, structure, but is completely natural, although rare, I think.
Are there any other similiar examples?
@@mullahosk585 only man made ones lol.
@@arcguardianthe “experts” pretty much said ”the joints in the rock, are natural, though we have no idea how they form, and we dismiss any other possibility for fear that we might be wrong.”
Give me a single example of naturally forming staircases and pyramids. Either "trust the experts" or trust your common sense.
It's not man made. It's mermaid made!
It's probably a combination of both. Like the sphinx, when these rock formations weren't submerged, how could people NOT have taken advantage of these convenient platforms?
Looks like a quarry.
has to be Man-made. these flat surfaces look like they were cut with precision.
The tomb of Himiko of Yamatai
why can't it be a mostly natural structure that was altered for use by humans?
Because the academics can’t admit we aren’t the most evolved most technologically advanced we’ve ever been. It would hurt their world view. People in these fields no longer care about doing research or science, they care about protecting the official narrative at all costs.
Because it isn't. That would be a lie.
@@saymyname2417you dont know that
@@armadillo9961 - I've watched a couple of videos and pictures of this site. The camera footage does not at all make it clear but when you see models and drawings of the who'e thing that's another story.
This looks like a quarry to me but it may have been anything. That's what nobody can know anymore. But what is obvious especially from models and drawings is that this is a structure that was built / shaped by somebody.
Whereas I stand corrected insofar as the oc may indeed be correct if this was a quarry. Because that would have originally been a natural structure altered by people.
@@saymyname2417Agreed it looks manmade especially when you consider there are apparently many more along the coastline for about 4 miles. Quarry makes sense too, and it also resembles the ziggurat
That interviewee who mention someone else who believe that was man-made without any scientific research just straight up killing that person's scientific career
Rare Earth channel had visited the island and debunked it.
It's just simply a natural rock formations wihout any human touch.
But the locals keep the legend/myth alive since that's the reason for the curious divers around the world will visit the place.
It's all about locals' economy from the tourism.
I think they threw it in the ocean
Natural with same size steps???
gotta start somewhere
Looks natural to me.
Time to wake up. That’s sculpted by humans
Will we ever know for sure.... maybe.... let's wait and see
This was featured in a Wii game called Endless ocean, a late game area, where you encounter a whale to photograph.
To compare it to a natural rock formation and says it's the same is like degrading human cognitive observation, it is in fact man made.
what's bgm?
I first discovered Yonaguni while surfing through a Tik Tok channel. 😝 🌊 🏄
Aliens and Giants.
Bad editing, had to make a choice between reading the subtitle or watching the sceneic video, the scenes were also changing too fast like a slide show. Would have preferred if they switched between showing a full-screen text overlapping the blurred video to give context and then just stick to showing just the video without any distractions.
Watch it twice, I did.
100% Man made. Just a tiny part of ancient relics all over the world.
The Bible said in Genesis, after Cain killed Abel, he was sent away by our great creator and he traveled until he reached the land of Nod and there he was married, when we had civilization and he had of five generations. Cain's parents, Adam and Eve, left the Garden of Eden after they sinned. and it was said in Genesis that Cain and Abel's father is different even though Eve conceived the same father. Maybe what you see is Cain's civilization slowly sinking into the sea, but before it sank, it was said in Genesis that the great creator sent a flood to the world, this is Noah's time to clean up the evil of mankind, Cain's civilization is referred to as will be erased because their wickedness is too much.
Maybe both? Like carve stairs & walls in natural cliffs? So back when sea levels were lower, maybe people adjusted the natural formation to suit them? But like if you can't grasp straight lines in nature, look up Giant's causeway in northern Ireland!
Neil de grasse tyson would say "it's a natural formation".
he would, as he's a grifter
That's the lost continent of wano
the oldest civilization is in Indonesia not in Japan.
Whoever said that Japan was the oldest civilisation?
did the BBC get Marianna Sping to 'debunk' this? 🤣 Nature doesn't make steps
Giant humans used to roam the Earth they built giant structures made out of stone and granite pure carving and heat thermal pressure and laser water pressure . Giant humans went extinction
Maybe they were try to build a pyramid and then gave up, over time the ocean covered it.
As much as I hate to admit it, it's 99% sure to be a natural geological feature !
The "experts" are lying, you can argue as to why. Nature doesn't work with straight lines, certainly not over and over.
U can't admit what u don't know.
IT MUST BE BOTH: A MANIPULATED-BY-MAN NATURAL FORMATION
Few can consider it is not either or, but very good.
Come on. Its bad when scientists go i think it's natural cause theres so much thats similar then show stuff that isnt that similar. One i want a factual explanation why it is or isn't man made, and i wanna see these formations that they say are so similar.
...can't you get someone to narrate in english? How can I see what you're trying to show me in the video if I have to read ?
Some geological formations are very regular in appearance and thus look manmade.
Is this a sick-unfunny joke? When he says "However, this can simply be explained by looking at other naturally formed landscapes which are similar to this." He provides no such examples!!!!
I guest people are still in denial about life here way before us and we'll never know what or who.... we can't ever be honest and say , yes, someone did this but we don't know who. We can't have the answer to everything. People aren't that dumb to think the water made that naturally. These people need another job if they really trying to convince someone of that. I love history and we shouldn't hide the truth
So, what's the truth?
The great flood during Noah's time. Scientists will continue to deny to avoid being kicked out of their jobs.
debunked...computer simulation show it taking 100's of years to fill the Mediterranean Sea from the Strait of Gilbraltar once it breached...
@@aerisgainsborough2141-
Computer simulations... are you THAT daft 😱?!
Nothing has been debunked. Because it cannot be debunked. There are flood myths from all over the world and the vast majority has the always same characteristics.
And there are artefacts like this. But whatever physical or geological proof may have existed is usually long gone.
Science is unable to prove or disprove anything in this regard. Isn't that obvious?!
@aerisgainsborough2141 Cataclysmic events during the flood and for hundreds of years as a result thereafter caused rapid changes. The flood represents massive, extremely powerful, and very rapid events.
You are correct!
Lol. Saw the heading and had to comment. As if...you think your going to get the truth for these dudes....shhhh. Hilarious.
it was the Aliens
These aren't natural . These could probably alter main stream history
dum dum dum