I honestly appreciated Parker a lot more in this one then with Charlie. Despite the fact that I disagree with his stance. But to be honest no one would know who he is, if he didnt take those actions.
It’s because Kirk would do the same to others, he would interject their arguments mid sentence with a “let me stop you there!” & ask them one of his prepared questions. Shapiro, as much as I think he’s a horrible person, was actually being quite patient here in contrast. Kirk was just sad to watch.
the pillar of kirk's argument essentially boiled down to religion, which is why parker was attacking his religious beliefs. A lot of christians will cite the bible for why they want to outlaw abortion - yet they won't then cite the same book when it tells them they're going to hell for wearing 2 different fabrics. shapiro wasn't making an appeal to religion here, otherwise i'm sure parker would bring up his religion. edit: to everyone saying "well this verse here says that we don't have to adhere to old testament laws"... that's awesome - then you don't get to reference old testament laws and moral codes and regulations as it pertains to abortion or homosexuality or any of the litany of regressive ideas either, that's all i was saying. sheesh.
@@E60666 because in the same way that college takes your money with the promise of higher salary when you get out (which is what kirk was claiming why college is a scam) - kirk's own religion has that same concept through tithing - give money to the church now for brownie points in heaven, which is what parker was getting at.
@@lonnylasagna Kirk never brought up religion in his arguments. Parker kept bringing it up as a distraction tactic and kept inflating his own ego over how great a debater he was. It was cringe and lame.
No just looks like Ben is soooo much more respectful and kind so that’s what he’s getting back. With Charlie it was either talk over him or get talked over. Parker was doing exactly what Charlie was doing back to him or just staying ahead of what he was about to do. & he had absolutely ridiculous things to say. I don’t care for Ben & def do not degree with his stances but even i can say Ben is kind, he is much much more kind, respectful, and actually makes sense when he answers why he thinks something. When you treat people like that and have a real conversation it’s much easier to have mutual respect.
@@jadaforsee1820what claim made by Shapiro do you disagree with? Because as an independent voter, I believe he brought really good arguments to the table. I only wish he had gotten more time with some of the people he debated. It seems like every time these discussions start getting somewhere the flags all get raised and the debate gets completely shut down…
They were telling Ben what his arguments were and then trying to disprove the strawmen, rather than trying to understand the actual argument and responding to that. It was quite an exercise in futility.
Regardless of how you feel about Ben, you have to admit it is impressive how much information he has stored in his head. Anything anyone brings up he has facts and info on.
If a person believes in GOD or a higher power, then it is a better theory that this being wants the extension of this race.....homosexuals would lead to the end of the race as they are not capable of reproduction
@@MsDudette21 I’m not sure what your even talking about. Those are all things he frequently talks about. Are you saying you don’t agree with his views on those things?
I like how the debate between Parker and Shapiro flowed. They actually listened and responded to each other and had a discussion rather than speak over each other.
@@Majorskillissue101 Ben and Charlie of course got different styles but Ben is dealing with a different Packer who deep down knew he got owned in the last video so he's being more cautious than last time
@@bridaguy No Charlie Kirk got destroyed last debate. He’s not even a good debater, that’s why he sticks to college campuses and debates kids who study and work on their majors instead of people who study politics.
2016--- OMG something wasn't right, it needs to be investigated. 2020-- NOTHING to see here, most free and fair election ever. That's why they would attempt, they aren't rational, logical thinkers.
Ben should have jumped in more. They make one super bad argument then jump to another super bad argument then to a third before Ben jumps in sometimes. Address each bad argument as they come in and don't let these kids filibuster.
@@allend5399 Out of curiosity, why do you think Trump would be a good POTUS? I hear people saying things like "He's a good businessman" -- even though he's bankrupted multiple businesses. He grew up with money, had all the mentoring opportunities, and went to one of the best business schools in the country. Make it make sense.
@@mr-bloo I think she is a threat. She has avoided and evaded demonstrating her true policies. For instance, one time she supports fracking, another time she doesn't. If she's so flippy floppy, why should anybody trust her?
Ben is by far one of the more talented debaters, and is not condescending or rude to the people he's debating with. Love or hate his political beliefs, he's a great spokesperson on these things.
I love how the prompt was kamala is the threat, and then every debater proceeded to talk about how trump is the threat without ever defending how kamala is not....
Tbh this is part of why she lost. Everything about her campaign revolves around trump, and its easier to make him the ultimate boogeyman rather than to promote yourself to all sides in a positive light
The blue and black shirt guy is respectful, listens, and actually seems open to learn something during the debate. Parker comes across as extremely arrogant, doesn't listen, and is less intelligent so he compensates with bravado, instant responses and talking fast.
Parker thinks if he asks the same question 5+ times back to back that it makes him seem like he made a gotcha, but really he only sounds smart to people who want him to be right, Ben is far more patient than most because I woulda just straight up said “I just answered that question 3 times, you’re not getting your gotcha, move on to your next attempt”
But he's fundamentally misunderstanding the prompt and bringing in irrelevant comparions and Ben has to waste time dismantling related but irrelevant claims...
@@superstandardexcept he’s not. He’s pointing out a contradiction in Ben’s claim and addressing potential hypocrisy. He may not be necessarily defending Kamala but he’s showing that trump is even worse.
@@blankname160no, Trump is our only hope and that kid was clueless to the realities of America. At the end of the day, these kids are just far less intelligent and they know it, so they go to their bag of responses. This is the epitome of the scene in Good Will Hunting and the pseudo intellectual from Harvard.
Parker I am sure read all the hate he got for how he behaved last time, and changed his behavior accordingly. The only way to change people like him is when they get backlash for their awful behavior.
Ben thinks Trump will have a normal conservstive presidency, when in fact that conservative presidency was based on those conservative officials who are not gonna be in his admin this time and most of them called him a fascist
@@bimjean1053is that why you voted for Biden who couldn’t even speak properly, forgets in the middle of interview and can’t even walk?? Oh…. Now we know
@@cringemaxxing28not being convinced of God’s existence is not equivalent to hating god, that’s just something that butthurt theists say when their dreadful arguments get debunked
Parker seems to not understand the difference between doing something that is not permitted by the institutions, vs actively trying to dismantle these institutions.
We are talking about a potential and previous president here. Constantly doing things that are not permitted by “the institutions” and making distrusting statements about said constitutions is not only dangerous but just completely irresponsible.
Example number 7 in the comments of conservatives saying they 'schooled' the opposition without elaborating how. And let's see if they respond to this reply with logic or with, "It's obvious. So if you can't see it you're just delusional" Punchabunch, not sure if you know this, but when I put something in quotes, I'm not calling anyone delusional. I'm giving an example of what you guys might say. Like that's literally not how the English language works. I just didn't call anyone delusional... At all...
@jumpy2783 😂😂😂😂😂😂 guess your name fits, huh? The irony is you calling someone else delusional... just another LEFTY "jumping" off a cliff because you're emotionally unstable...
For the record, trump does the same thing, talks about how bad the democrats are and doesn’t even talk about his solutions in detail, only really “concepts of an plan” lol Bro talks about inflation, but can’t name one thing he would have done to curb it. Most people left and right are low iq, so on a mental level, these emotional charge discussions are the easiest to have and most attractive.
A lot like her interviews and town halls. She doesn't give reasons to vote for her, rather she only gives reasons she thinks you should vote against Trump lol.
I noticed that too and find it annoying. There is obviously nothing of substance her supporters could bring up about her specifically but "what aboutism"s on Trump. Pathetic.
I mean, comparing both is the point. Trump is a bigger threat than Kamala so the goal is to convince people that he is. Trump has a record and it cant be off limits. Especially because he is running for President
Came from the main channel video to say Adam was hands down the best guest in this debate. So educated and well informed, calm, respectful, and made great points. Wish he had a chance to talk in the main one too!
When Ben asked “Who takes everything Trump says literally?” and everyone said “yes”, Ben should have then said, “Well the very next day Trump clarified that he did not want to suspend the Constitution, and that his words were being misinterpreted”.
My first job out of college forced me to get vaccinated or I would be let go. It was the first time in my life I felt my civil liberties were violated. Sure I could have quit and I eventually did, but being fresh out of college I did not want to be unemployed with zero work experience. Plus many other companies were doing the same thing. The fact that Joe Biden had the power to do that, terrifies me.
You’ve also as a child had to get mandatory vaccines to attend public school. That’s been a thing for a long time. And those mandatory vaccine policies were put in place because you were actively a danger to others for not getting vaccinated. The same way that you are given penalties for committing crimes because those are a danger to others. You can’t just do whatever the hell you want in America.
Your civil liberties were not violated (depending on the state). Assuming you were in a state that allowed vaccine requirements, this is much like complaining about your 'free speech' rights getting violated after saying hate speech that is banned at your workplace. Your workplace requiring things of you to work there is not inherently unconstitutional. And during a pandemic, it is perfectly reasonable to expect people to protect themselves so they cannot endanger themselves and other employees, putting the workplace at risk.
@@skizzlechizzle "...it is perfectly reasonable to expect people to protect themselves so they cannot endanger themselves and other employees, putting the workplace at risk." What does this have to do with us talking about vaccine mandates at work? XD
Do you even watch his Livestreams? I view them for multiple sessions almost every day, and I only sometimes see debates on religion. Plus, he and Dean have stated that they have nothing against Christians/Catholics. It's only when they use it for hate when they whip out the guns. As a baptized Catholic myself I find it odd how many seem to agree with Sabus' comment. I understand it's an exaggeration; however, it always comes from somewhere. I don't agree with the idea that Catholics and religious persons have done more harm than good in society. You'll find me in any comment section defending my faith (as most would). But to claim that hate isn't a trait of many in our religion is highly distasteful. If Christians couldn't hate, there wouldn't be a discussion on whether Christians have done more good or bad throughout history. Christians wouldn't have such a violent past in the form of war. We are taught these things about virtue, yes, but we consistently fail at acting on these teachings. And it doesn't have to do with ideology, it's because we are humans. Like I even made my first reply under this comment with a little bit of hatred. But what I can assure you is that your faith in the Lord doesn't equate to eternal benevolence. It's not possible.
Ben Shapiro: "Kamala Harris is a threat..." Everyone else: "But Donald Trump..." Summarizes this debate pretty much. These people are for Harris because they are against Trump and have really no other valid reason. The problem with this is that this is caused by their lack of understanding how literally anything works and they just believe false narratives. Shapiro doesnt debate them but just schools them in political knowledge. I said this way to often, but I will repeat it again: Most problems in the US could be solved longterm by proper education.
I don’t get the problem with that reasoning. I see the problem that these are our only two candidates, but saying you are voting for a candidate because the other one is worse is a valid reason. Ofc, having two bad candidates is a problem but that’s not what this debate is about
@@Dunny420 You completely missed the point I am actually making. They vote for Harris but cant argue why Trump is worse, because they build their opinion mostly onn "facts" that are wrong. This is why Shapiro doesnt have to argue with them, but simply explains how things really work.
There are two candidates in this elections so its a perfectly valid strategy to make arguments against Trump rather than make arguments for Harris. I do agree though that proper education would fix many of the problems in this country. That's why why one of the largest electoral divides in this country is college educated vs not and we are seeing college educated people vote for Harris at why higher rates than non-college educated people.
Because they didnt like the overall outcome of the debate. This was a debate, the other was a bunch of Grown man children screaming, interupting and acting unproffesional.
TDS is better than idolizing Donny like the second coming of Jesus 😅. Donny only won 2016 from fear mongering everyone non stop about Obama and Hillary.
What I find funny is that parker has changed his whole act with Ben. When parker talked with Charlie, parker would interrupt a lot and would stray away from the main subject but when parker debated Ben, parker was very respectful. What changed between these two videos.
@michellehuffman2025 ehhh, that could be accurate but when I watched the Charlie Kirk video parker was egging on the topic. Maybe parker was try to prove something. So I I agree with you 70%
4:05 if i was Ben , i would immediately follow up with " so when Joe Biden said " if you cant decide if your for me, or for Trump, than you AINT BLACK " did yall take that seriously? missed opportunity to cook some democrats right there...
They are hypocrites, they will believe verbatim everything DJT says, IF ITS BAD. But if he clarifies or denies what they spew about him he suddenly is lying. They have no foundation nor standing, they have been told day in and day out to hate him and blindly support those that oppose him, no substance, no policy, just “I’m not Trump!” and they flock to them like flies to a corpse.
@@joshuamartinez7409😂😂I think he just sees the potential in Dean being a big name debater for the Left for years to come and that he’s actually an awesome kid that understands politics and people on a level that not many millennials or Gen X can while also being super respectful in conversation.
Adam actually made compelling arguments that adapted to Ben's responses. I believe he did the best job. Where others were making lacking emotional arguments that were supported based on the reaction of the majority, he made factual and reasonable statements
Tell me what was so emotional about Parker's? Or Dean's? Or Guys's? And please don't respond with the, "it's literally so obvious." Use evidence and reasoning to support your claim
@@jumpy2783Parker and Dean are essentially the same. They use the same few talking points and don't know how to adapt outside of those. Ben doesn't believe what they came prepared for him to believe which showed in the way they responded. Only that last kid stalemated Ben by essentially boiling it down to Ben just believes the Harris administration has a better chance of being successful despite Trump also being guilty of trying to break the same institutions. Trump just does it in different, less subversive ways so it's more likely to fail due tothe robust checks and balances system
Not at all -he continually shifted the goalposts of the argument which was they Biden was not threatening institutions merely because he constantly sought out different tactics in order to accomplish the same ends which the SCOTUS already declared unconstitutional. That *is* totalitarian excess and an attempted arrogation of powers that the executive has no constitutional claim to. The issue is not that Biden utilitized the “wrong” method of forgiving student loan debt without congressional action, but that he tried to do it *at all* and REPEATEDLY attempted to forgive student loan debt. He knew damn well that that action was unconstitutional, yet didn’t care at all. Thats the issue Ben is referring to. Ironically this is the very same criticism that was raised by the Left about Trump contesting the election and employing various strategies in order to affect the outcome he desired.
Adam’s (the last kid) arguments were iron-clad. As a Shapiro enjoyer and Trump-leaning voter - I cannot disagree. This is the first time in years that I hear a valid and non-emotive argument against Trump. Well done.
I was. Actually thinking the same thing. Sometimes I forget the motives of particular types of voters. Instead of thinking for yourself... They gained in energy by all agreeing in the same thing; even chanting. but yet they call us us the cult
I like how this was a question directed at Kamala and all they talked about was Trump. We literally couldnt have more proof of how kamala voters and herself dont really have much to go on and to defend themselves and always resort to going for trump instead.
To be fair to them, this election is really a which is worse type of thing. I would've preferred if they stayed on prompt but that's the only feasible way to argue this.
Kamala didn't try to steal an election she lost while spreading lies and conspiracies and inciting an insurrection. Hope that helps. It's an absurd question.
Did you not listen to a single thing the kid in the blue striped shirt said? The kid brought up example after example of how trump was a threat, Ben never denied anything he said and said every single thing trump did was bad. He just kept saying that despite trump doing all that bad stuff, despite him hiring people around him who will be more loyal to him than to the constitution, that despite trump trying to actively undermine the institutions of the US in a way we haven’t seen in over 100 years, that “oh but he won’t because our institutions will hold”, which is a bad argument. Just because a dam can hold back a flood, is an unprecedented flood not a threat to the dam? This is where Ben fell short.
Props to Parker for being more respectful this time around. If he intentionally made an effort to change his demeanor compared to last debate, thats difficult and should be recognized.
@@lisetteirizarry4534 he was less aggressive but I wouldn’t attribute that to a good character. Charlie Kirk is someone who will just take the punches and not strike back with personal attacks. He’ll continue the debate without getting personal. Ben on the other hand, will bite back and Parker probably knows that.
How does religion matter at this point? U basically saying he's more disrespectful to charlie bc charlie is a Christian and more respectful on this guy bc he is a Jewish man. Religion wasn't even mentioned in their debate😂@@dubemmba9602
@@hobbso8508 you can definitely make that argument but they're completely ignoring the claim, likely because they know almost nothing good about Harris and everything bad about Trump.
@@archive8080 Ben shifts the argument too, for the exact reason we know. Because everyone already understands that the prompt is just a false equivolency designed to make Harris look as bad as Trump.
It's encouraging to see a level of discourse happening here. There isn't an air of 'attack' with these conversations and America needs more of this. You people have to live with each other!
Yeah, I was actually pretty disappointed even though I ardently disagree with him. I don’t think Kirk did well in that debate because he was so caught off guard by Parker’s manipulation tactics. Also, without the Christianity straw manning, he can’t really excel. This really shows how much of a facade he put on there. Shapiro is also much sharper intellectually (and at 40 years old, more experienced) than both Parker and Kirk.
I mean he cooked here. I agree with Shapiro on every criticism of Kamala and the Dems attempt to alter/change/eradicate institutional restriction/limitations that would only serve their power. But there's no question Trump did the same in that instance of sending false electors. Ben should have said yes, that was a threat, I just think Kamala poses a much bigger one.
@@somesweetdreamm Ben is an Ivy-League-trained lawyer. Kirk is not. As such, they don't form arguments in the same way. However, when Parker points about specific actions Trump has taken, Ben doesn't deny them. He just dismisses Trump's behavior (because people stopped him from carrying out plans he had). The fact he even attempted to do certain things should scare everybody.
His patience to go down irrelevant rabbit trails, and his knowledge to still correct on the rabbit trails are unreal. Amazing patience, kindness, and knowledge.
I’m a remote worker who has never stepped foot in my company’s office…. I got an email one day saying I had to get the c0vd booster by a certain deadline…. I ignored it, and on the day of the deadline my boss reached out and told me the people upstairs were going to let me go if he didn’t show them proof of my booster. I got it reluctantly that very day, completely against my will only for the sake of keeping my job….. I still haven’t stepped a foot in that office and have no idea why I was forced to get it. This had nothing to do with public health
Except he missed Ben’s point several times about credible threats to the constitution and actually most of the students did. Kamala and Biden are much more clever and sneaky while Trump is a bull in a china shop.
13:44 - These folks think they have these gotcha moments, and then Ben calmly explains how there is no gotcha at all if you allow yourself to see nuance.
I love these kinds of discussions. It's really heartening to see young people use their brains to defend their views with facts not feelings. Good to Ben for participating!!
@@gogogadgetGlock When you don't know what you're talking about, then yes your opinion isn't as valid as someone who does know what they're talking about. In my opinion, I thought we should land the plane nose first into the terminal because it would be quicker, but the lame ass pilot thought we should use the landing gear on the runway and taxi to the terminal. Ok grandpa.
What trump said was "if we cant have fair elections how can we expect to uphold the constitution? Might as well throw it away." Never was meant to be taken literally.
@@naruinoiscanoninanalternat2947Trump could say he would suspend the constitution but Republicans would lick the sweat from his balls, he’s deeply anti-USA and somehow the party of patriots got conned into voting for an anti-American president lol
But he's literally trying to do it. What are you people talking about. He's already tried to do it. Ben literally conceded this very thing in the video in his debate with Parker. My god you adult's analytical abilities are so poor that the only two cells in my brain have evaporated. I'm 16 and yet I can follow a basic conversation better than you people.
@GeriatricPimp it is what he did though? It was essentially him telling them that they were worried about the wrong things and why. it showed how much fear mongering is going on from the media.
I don’t think anyone was educating the other. For example, the kids do bring up historical examples and a knowledge of the programs and separation of powers. Ben knows this. They’re basically arguing over who is more likely to be a credible threat. They think Trump. Ben thinks Harris. None of them showed any lack of knowledge on the topics that were being argued.
The girl at the start was the best I’ve seen at the whole show this entire time. Speaks a lot of everyone’s temperament that they couldn’t stand her for more than a few minutes. Honestly seemed like the most honest one out there. And the most likely to disagree and yet still have a fair discussion, so what in the actual fuck.
@@Anthonyh4523 I see what you're saying. I think it's more so for views because both people can be seen as controversial (by both sides going both ways). I think you're right, but they also want money.
@@Anthonyh4523 Jubilee is a company and they want to make the most money. They wouldn’t routinely give people on the right a platform if they were left leaning-as they have done with many people besides Ben and Charlie, who were already popular. And 90% of people in the commments seem to be unaware how bias we are. You’ll pick who won subconsciously before the debate starts, and then justify your conclusion throughout the entire thing. I guarantee you if you go to say, TikTok, everyone is saying Ben was destroyed too. Jubilee don’t need to hide any debates, because everyone will just think their side won. Do you really think Ben was “destroyed” on the main channel? I doubt it.
I don’t know how anyone could stay a Democrat after listening to Ben Shapiro. He just understands things in a way that the average person couldn’t ever really comprehend fully.
@@FatalDyZrBen failed to disprove his position. He appealed to the guard rails, but then avoided the fact that trump and his minions have and are actively working to destroy those guard rails.
One of the most significant things in this video was when Ben asks everyone if they take everything Trump says seriously. The fact that everyone raises their hand just goes to show that Dems don’t ACTUALLY understand who Donald Trump is. The man is a jokester at his core and you HAVE to contextualize what he’s saying.
Everyone raised their hand? Three, maybe four people raised their hand, so we've got a different idea of what "everyone" means. You can't just excuse everything he says by saying "he's a jokester, you can't take what he says seriously" when you have people who have actually worked for him saying he is the worst possible candidate you could imagine. That people actually WANT someone they say you can't take literally to be the person in the highest office of the country is concerning. I mean, here in Canada we have the same sort of cult mentality regarding Trudeau supporters, who lap up everything he says and ignores anything which doesn't support their narrative. Hell, the Liberals and their supporters even try to dogwhistle the public by trying to attach MAGA to the Conservatives who, if we're to be honest, might even be slightly to the left of the Democrats in the US.
Parker was much more respectful in this than the one with Charlie Kirk. The one with Kirk he was constantly interrupting and was unlikeable.
he kind of got destroyed but at least he wasn't an asshole
Much less adrenal
I honestly appreciated Parker a lot more in this one then with Charlie. Despite the fact that I disagree with his stance. But to be honest no one would know who he is, if he didnt take those actions.
It’s because Kirk would do the same to others, he would interject their arguments mid sentence with a “let me stop you there!” & ask them one of his prepared questions.
Shapiro, as much as I think he’s a horrible person, was actually being quite patient here in contrast.
Kirk was just sad to watch.
@@scottylikeamelody much less Adderall
wow Parker directly attacked the religion of the Christian guy but not the jewish guy, I wonder why
😂😂 Very interesting
the pillar of kirk's argument essentially boiled down to religion, which is why parker was attacking his religious beliefs. A lot of christians will cite the bible for why they want to outlaw abortion - yet they won't then cite the same book when it tells them they're going to hell for wearing 2 different fabrics. shapiro wasn't making an appeal to religion here, otherwise i'm sure parker would bring up his religion.
edit: to everyone saying "well this verse here says that we don't have to adhere to old testament laws"... that's awesome - then you don't get to reference old testament laws and moral codes and regulations as it pertains to abortion or homosexuality or any of the litany of regressive ideas either, that's all i was saying. sheesh.
How did college is scam have to do with religion?
@@E60666 because in the same way that college takes your money with the promise of higher salary when you get out (which is what kirk was claiming why college is a scam) - kirk's own religion has that same concept through tithing - give money to the church now for brownie points in heaven, which is what parker was getting at.
@@lonnylasagna Kirk never brought up religion in his arguments. Parker kept bringing it up as a distraction tactic and kept inflating his own ego over how great a debater he was. It was cringe and lame.
Looks like parker took his meds today
He knew he wouldn't be able to out talk Shapiro
?
No just looks like Ben is soooo much more respectful and kind so that’s what he’s getting back.
With Charlie it was either talk over him or get talked over. Parker was doing exactly what Charlie was doing back to him or just staying ahead of what he was about to do. & he had absolutely ridiculous things to say.
I don’t care for Ben & def do not degree with his stances but even i can say Ben is kind, he is much much more kind, respectful, and actually makes sense when he answers why he thinks something. When you treat people like that and have a real conversation it’s much easier to have mutual respect.
LOL
@@jadaforsee1820what claim made by Shapiro do you disagree with? Because as an independent voter, I believe he brought really good arguments to the table. I only wish he had gotten more time with some of the people he debated. It seems like every time these discussions start getting somewhere the flags all get raised and the debate gets completely shut down…
They were telling Ben what his arguments were and then trying to disprove the strawmen, rather than trying to understand the actual argument and responding to that. It was quite an exercise in futility.
Regardless of how you feel about Ben, you have to admit it is impressive how much information he has stored in his head. Anything anyone brings up he has facts and info on.
@@webdavis false
@@webdavis Then why there's no such person on the 'Democratic' side?
true. except when it comes to the southern strategy, if a god exists, and jusifying homophobia.
If a person believes in GOD or a higher power, then it is a better theory that this being wants the extension of this race.....homosexuals would lead to the end of the race as they are not capable of reproduction
@@MsDudette21 I’m not sure what your even talking about. Those are all things he frequently talks about. Are you saying you don’t agree with his views on those things?
I like how the debate between Parker and Shapiro flowed. They actually listened and responded to each other and had a discussion rather than speak over each other.
Ben is much better than Charlie Kirk and I think Parker realized that and debated with more respect compared to last time.
@@Majorskillissue101
Ben and Charlie of course got different styles but Ben is dealing with a different Packer who deep down knew he got owned in the last video so he's being more cautious than last time
@@bridaguy No Charlie Kirk got destroyed last debate. He’s not even a good debater, that’s why he sticks to college campuses and debates kids who study and work on their majors instead of people who study politics.
@@Majorskillissue101
Packer got wrecked!
Alot of the comments disagree with you kiddo🤣🤣🤣
What happens when Parker cant talk.about Christianity 😂
Why the hell would anybody want to argue the constitution with a constitutional lawyer and think that’s gonna turn out good for them
Other lawyers disagree, he's wrong. So it's easy once you know the argument
@@btk411so because other people say he's wrong you just agree? Not think theirs bias involved
@@btk411good thing that you’re wrong then
@@Beard-OF-Courage you are illiterate
2016--- OMG something wasn't right, it needs to be investigated.
2020-- NOTHING to see here, most free and fair election ever.
That's why they would attempt, they aren't rational, logical thinkers.
Ben Shapiro is too good at debating. He gets irked at times, but he has extremely good composure. Good work Ben.
Ben should have jumped in more. They make one super bad argument then jump to another super bad argument then to a third before Ben jumps in sometimes. Address each bad argument as they come in and don't let these kids filibuster.
This time Parker couldn’t randomly bring up Christianity to a Jew, completely distracting from the topic.
Exactly, LOL
💪 Trump2024
Much of what Charlie believed hinged on his religious beliefs -- not facts.
@@allend5399 Out of curiosity, why do you think Trump would be a good POTUS? I hear people saying things like "He's a good businessman" -- even though he's bankrupted multiple businesses. He grew up with money, had all the mentoring opportunities, and went to one of the best business schools in the country. Make it make sense.
@@chocolateangel8743it’s a good support
The topic is "Kamala Harris is a threat" and all they are talking about is Donald Trump...
Because she isn't a threat...the person she is actively running against is.
Actually they did talk about Harris, but they brought up Trump because he is actually a threat and is the other candidate
@@mr-bloo I think she is a threat. She has avoided and evaded demonstrating her true policies. For instance, one time she supports fracking, another time she doesn't. If she's so flippy floppy, why should anybody trust her?
@@123duelist That's the effect of Smirnoff. Don't blame Kamala
@@Anks0060 That would still be her fault for drinking it!
Shapiro: “Kamala Harris is a threat”
Debaters: “Let’s talk about trump.”
This is the way of Kamala, clearly.. it was her entire candidacy.
actually insane. wish ben shapiro called them out. but maybe this is what jubilee wanted
It shows their bias.
Super glad they didn’t win, there’s no room for bias in leadership.
The entire Democrat campaign in a nutshell.
None of them defend Kamala without saying trump is bad 😂.
...That's the point of the argument. To defend Kamala against attacks that better apply to Trump.
low key proof jubliee only cares about clicks / reactions, not the debates being had.
They're a company, they want money. That's how they all work
there's plenty of longform debates out there. This is political junk food but it tastes good.
Not shet, it’s a business at the end of the day
Ppl when they realize a company only cares about profits: 🫨🫨🫨🫨🫨🫨
Just because you don't believe what they say doesn't mean they just want clicks.
This red flag system got to go. Just let Ben and Parker debate
They should just have 10 ppl max
They have other people that need to speak as well not just Parker
It wouldn't be surrounded then. I do agree tho that they should have a better program to do debate.
@@nomad_333_ 50% of this congregation have nothing of value to say
@@dylancurbjumperfair enough
Ben is by far one of the more talented debaters, and is not condescending or rude to the people he's debating with. Love or hate his political beliefs, he's a great spokesperson on these things.
Lol yeah okay like the way he laughs in the face of everyone of these people after they get voted out? He's a POS
Parker found the one guy who speaks quicker than anyone and decided to slow down
I love how the prompt was kamala is the threat, and then every debater proceeded to talk about how trump is the threat without ever defending how kamala is not....
It was Kamala herself's tactic the entire time. Deflect deflect deflect.
It’s why they lost the election there were just anti trump but never pro there own party
Tbh this is part of why she lost. Everything about her campaign revolves around trump, and its easier to make him the ultimate boogeyman rather than to promote yourself to all sides in a positive light
Yup.
Because they always projected whenever they attacked Trump.
That’s calling out hypocrisy
Wow, Parker should take note of the blue and black shirt guy. So respectful, extremely articulate, and demonstrate what a civil debate is.
The blue and black shirt guy is respectful, listens, and actually seems open to learn something during the debate. Parker comes across as extremely arrogant, doesn't listen, and is less intelligent so he compensates with bravado, instant responses and talking fast.
@@YippeeKiYayMrFalcon Parker has been taught that behaving like that is good for him, so he will continue to behave like that.
Who Blues Clues ?
Parker was a lot more respectful in this episode and he had a lot more composure than the Kirk episode
@@alex_awae Feel like he just wants a shining moment.
Parker thinks if he asks the same question 5+ times back to back that it makes him seem like he made a gotcha, but really he only sounds smart to people who want him to be right, Ben is far more patient than most because I woulda just straight up said “I just answered that question 3 times, you’re not getting your gotcha, move on to your next attempt”
Parker is a tiktok debater. It shows.
The last kid... WOW, full of knowledge and composure! this is what debating is. Respect to both Ben and him!
But he's fundamentally misunderstanding the prompt and bringing in irrelevant comparions and Ben has to waste time dismantling related but irrelevant claims...
@@superstandardexcept he’s not. He’s pointing out a contradiction in Ben’s claim and addressing potential hypocrisy. He may not be necessarily defending Kamala but he’s showing that trump is even worse.
@@superstandardsome of you just say things just for sake.
@@blankname160no, Trump is our only hope and that kid was clueless to the realities of America. At the end of the day, these kids are just far less intelligent and they know it, so they go to their bag of responses. This is the epitome of the scene in Good Will Hunting and the pseudo intellectual from Harvard.
@@blankname160 so pointing out hypocrisy by being a hypocrite😂
Parker I am sure read all the hate he got for how he behaved last time, and changed his behavior accordingly. The only way to change people like him is when they get backlash for their awful behavior.
True. Call them out.
It’s not that deep bro. He’s growing up he’ll learn to be civil. Saying hate is necessary shows your immaturity. Hope you aren’t over age 20
u seem real sensitive lol
@@timg8257 Parker did not suddenly naturally grow up in the last couple of months.
@@Macca-95 He did-because he heard what people were saying about his behaviour. It’s how everyone learns and it is natural.
Why isn’t this on the main Jubilee channel?
Yet they wanna scream that everyone other than them is for ‘censorship’ and ‘free speech’. Lol. So pathetic.
@@watermelon1112 No it is not lol I did not see this this content in the main video.
Who cares, these kids are all emotional messes and have not contributed to society yet to have an opinion they weren’t taught
Because it was an actual debate.
I’m wondering the same thing
These people are worried more about what's being said,than what's being done
Ben thinks Trump will have a normal conservstive presidency, when in fact that conservative presidency was based on those conservative officials who are not gonna be in his admin this time and most of them called him a fascist
It explains why democrats went bananas when Trump tweeted confefe
They thought he was tweeting some sort of evil code to his supporters I imagine.
Don’t underestimate the power of words. Trumps agitation led to people storming the capitol
@@bimjean1053please be quiet
@@bimjean1053is that why you voted for Biden who couldn’t even speak properly, forgets in the middle of interview and can’t even walk?? Oh…. Now we know
Super smart Ben and a bunch of dynamic young people with strong opinions make for an excellent and respectful to and fro. Really great.
because ben isn’t christian, parker was a bit more respectful. turns out he just really hates God
Right, everything comes back to jews being evil. Literally, everything, right Professor?
He hates the true God.
@@cringemaxxing28not being convinced of God’s existence is not equivalent to hating god, that’s just something that butthurt theists say when their dreadful arguments get debunked
damn you calling jews not believers in God.
@@Abraxun To be fair that is quite legitimately what the book says, more or less.
Parker seems to not understand the difference between doing something that is not permitted by the institutions, vs actively trying to dismantle these institutions.
We are talking about a potential and previous president here.
Constantly doing things that are not permitted by “the institutions” and making distrusting statements about said constitutions is not only dangerous but just completely irresponsible.
Yet removing the filibuster is not actively trying to dismantle institutions..
@@TheKennyboy92is not? Come one....
@@contrerasmcr100 No
@@TheKennyboy92 you're in denial just like most of them
Its not really a debate it's just ben telling them how the government works.
😂 Facts
Example number 7 in the comments of conservatives saying they 'schooled' the opposition without elaborating how. And let's see if they respond to this reply with logic or with, "It's obvious. So if you can't see it you're just delusional"
Punchabunch, not sure if you know this, but when I put something in quotes, I'm not calling anyone delusional. I'm giving an example of what you guys might say. Like that's literally not how the English language works. I just didn't call anyone delusional... At all...
@@jumpy2783 10:03
@jumpy2783 😂😂😂😂😂😂 guess your name fits, huh? The irony is you calling someone else delusional... just another LEFTY "jumping" off a cliff because you're emotionally unstable...
@@jumpy2783 if you want to debate a point you have to pick a point. if ben was wrong about something say that then.
These people ask a question then Ben answers and they ask the question again because they don’t like his answer like he’s gonna change it 🤣
Love how the argument is about Kamala Harris but the whole time they talked about trump that pretty much sums up how lost these people are
For the record, trump does the same thing, talks about how bad the democrats are and doesn’t even talk about his solutions in detail, only really “concepts of an plan” lol Bro talks about inflation, but can’t name one thing he would have done to curb it. Most people left and right are low iq, so on a mental level, these emotional charge discussions are the easiest to have and most attractive.
A lot like her interviews and town halls. She doesn't give reasons to vote for her, rather she only gives reasons she thinks you should vote against Trump lol.
I noticed that too and find it annoying. There is obviously nothing of substance her supporters could bring up about her specifically but "what aboutism"s on Trump. Pathetic.
Exactly. Was just going to comment this
I mean, comparing both is the point.
Trump is a bigger threat than Kamala so the goal is to convince people that he is.
Trump has a record and it cant be off limits. Especially because he is running for President
Came from the main channel video to say Adam was hands down the best guest in this debate. So educated and well informed, calm, respectful, and made great points. Wish he had a chance to talk in the main one too!
He had a good session in the 30 vs 30 debate, in both parts.
The first young lady wasn't bad.
When Ben asked “Who takes everything Trump says literally?” and everyone said “yes”, Ben should have then said, “Well the very next day Trump clarified that he did not want to suspend the Constitution, and that his words were being misinterpreted”.
flipflopping
@@TheLowman9 YIkes did you just learn that word today?
how were his words being misinterpreted when he literally said a fraud of this kind calls for the termination of all articles of the constitution....?
Or that he has nothing to do with Project 2025
He should have told the trans guy “trump said you have a penis you believe him right?”
My first job out of college forced me to get vaccinated or I would be let go. It was the first time in my life I felt my civil liberties were violated. Sure I could have quit and I eventually did, but being fresh out of college I did not want to be unemployed with zero work experience. Plus many other companies were doing the same thing. The fact that Joe Biden had the power to do that, terrifies me.
When I was told that I asked if they would pay for any damage done by vaccines.
You’ve also as a child had to get mandatory vaccines to attend public school. That’s been a thing for a long time. And those mandatory vaccine policies were put in place because you were actively a danger to others for not getting vaccinated. The same way that you are given penalties for committing crimes because those are a danger to others. You can’t just do whatever the hell you want in America.
My company protected tens of thousands of people against exactly the reason you lost your job. It was 100% a violation of civil liberties.
Your civil liberties were not violated (depending on the state). Assuming you were in a state that allowed vaccine requirements, this is much like complaining about your 'free speech' rights getting violated after saying hate speech that is banned at your workplace. Your workplace requiring things of you to work there is not inherently unconstitutional. And during a pandemic, it is perfectly reasonable to expect people to protect themselves so they cannot endanger themselves and other employees, putting the workplace at risk.
@@skizzlechizzle "...it is perfectly reasonable to expect people to protect themselves so they cannot endanger themselves and other employees, putting the workplace at risk."
What does this have to do with us talking about vaccine mandates at work?
XD
I wonder what Parker will talk about, now that he's debating a non-Christian
😭
Do you even watch his Livestreams? I view them for multiple sessions almost every day, and I only sometimes see debates on religion. Plus, he and Dean have stated that they have nothing against Christians/Catholics. It's only when they use it for hate when they whip out the guns.
As a baptized Catholic myself I find it odd how many seem to agree with Sabus' comment. I understand it's an exaggeration; however, it always comes from somewhere. I don't agree with the idea that Catholics and religious persons have done more harm than good in society. You'll find me in any comment section defending my faith (as most would). But to claim that hate isn't a trait of many in our religion is highly distasteful. If Christians couldn't hate, there wouldn't be a discussion on whether Christians have done more good or bad throughout history. Christians wouldn't have such a violent past in the form of war. We are taught these things about virtue, yes, but we consistently fail at acting on these teachings. And it doesn't have to do with ideology, it's because we are humans. Like I even made my first reply under this comment with a little bit of hatred. But what I can assure you is that your faith in the Lord doesn't equate to eternal benevolence. It's not possible.
That never happens @@jumpy2783
@@jumpy2783 Christians cant hate thats an athiest thing
You clearly haven’t even watched him much huh?
Ben Shapiro: "Kamala Harris is a threat..."
Everyone else: "But Donald Trump..."
Summarizes this debate pretty much. These people are for Harris because they are against Trump and have really no other valid reason. The problem with this is that this is caused by their lack of understanding how literally anything works and they just believe false narratives. Shapiro doesnt debate them but just schools them in political knowledge. I said this way to often, but I will repeat it again: Most problems in the US could be solved longterm by proper education.
Perfectly said. The way those people think is a shame.
I don’t get the problem with that reasoning. I see the problem that these are our only two candidates, but saying you are voting for a candidate because the other one is worse is a valid reason. Ofc, having two bad candidates is a problem but that’s not what this debate is about
@@Dunny420 You completely missed the point I am actually making. They vote for Harris but cant argue why Trump is worse, because they build their opinion mostly onn "facts" that are wrong. This is why Shapiro doesnt have to argue with them, but simply explains how things really work.
the continues to show why trump is a threat, and ben deflects.
There are two candidates in this elections so its a perfectly valid strategy to make arguments against Trump rather than make arguments for Harris. I do agree though that proper education would fix many of the problems in this country. That's why why one of the largest electoral divides in this country is college educated vs not and we are seeing college educated people vote for Harris at why higher rates than non-college educated people.
If Ben buys Jubilee can he call it Jewbilee? 🤔
I second this
i was thinking of this joke. i can't help myself but ruin my digitial footprint.
Seconded 😂
😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣
LOL...they're so blind to the ACTUAL threats and more worried about the perceived threats...Ben OWNED all of them. Especially the smug "teacher."
This should be on the main channel ngl
The full video is
They can post whatever they want on their channel
@@Moon_dinosaurs and I can comment whatever I want
@@watermelon1112 These are not a part of ur "full video"
@@watermelon1112this isn’t in the full video
this should be on the main channel. why isn’t it????
@@watermelon1112 This part is not in the main video.
Because they didnt like the overall outcome of the debate. This was a debate, the other was a bunch of Grown man children screaming, interupting and acting unproffesional.
@@marclucido5721 100% with u on this
I think they was trying to grow this channel useing parker
💯💯💯💯💯
These idiots didn’t offer a single rebuttal about Kamala being a threat. It was all “what about Trump?” TDS nonsense
Yuuppp
Fr
Because most leftists I talk to realize she's also a shitty president, it's just she is the lesser of two evils.
TDS is better than idolizing Donny like the second coming of Jesus 😅. Donny only won 2016 from fear mongering everyone non stop about Obama and Hillary.
Cope harder.
What I find funny is that parker has changed his whole act with Ben. When parker talked with Charlie, parker would interrupt a lot and would stray away from the main subject but when parker debated Ben, parker was very respectful. What changed between these two videos.
I think because he's so full of hatred for Christianity,whereas, Ben is a Jew. So he felt less like attacking this time.
@michellehuffman2025 ehhh, that could be accurate but when I watched the Charlie Kirk video parker was egging on the topic. Maybe parker was try to prove something. So I I agree with you 70%
Whats Shaq doing there? Tried putting a red wig thinking we wouldn't know it's him
😂😂😂😂😂
I think Shaq looks better
🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️😂😂😂😂
Lmfao!🤣
😭😂
4:05 if i was Ben , i would immediately follow up with
" so when Joe Biden said " if you cant decide if your for me, or for Trump, than you AINT BLACK " did yall take that seriously?
missed opportunity to cook some democrats right there...
They are hypocrites, they will believe verbatim everything DJT says, IF ITS BAD. But if he clarifies or denies what they spew about him he suddenly is lying. They have no foundation nor standing, they have been told day in and day out to hate him and blindly support those that oppose him, no substance, no policy, just “I’m not Trump!” and they flock to them like flies to a corpse.
Biden isn't running tho
@@Whyulaughing and that has what to do with him saying this back in 2020 before HE WAS PRESIDENT ... ?
@@marshboii it's just irrelevant
Except Biden was serious in that example lol.
"Just lemme cook for like 3 mins and I promise I'll let you come up" 🤣🤣🤣🤦🏽♂️
6 minutes later lmao
To be fair, he really did cook. That was a banger conversation
Bros submissive to Dean 😂
Bro In fact did not let him go n he over cooked 😂😂💀
@@joshuamartinez7409😂😂I think he just sees the potential in Dean being a big name debater for the Left for years to come and that he’s actually an awesome kid that understands politics and people on a level that not many millennials or Gen X can while also being super respectful in conversation.
Thx Ben for clearing up what all people think so negative about everything that ur conversations u had with everyone. God bless u, n all..!
Adam actually made compelling arguments that adapted to Ben's responses. I believe he did the best job. Where others were making lacking emotional arguments that were supported based on the reaction of the majority, he made factual and reasonable statements
I agree he had very good points, but bens response was that both party’s do the same thing
Adam was definitely the strongest in this and on the main channel. Extremely knowledgeable, "adaptable" (as you said), and polite.
Tell me what was so emotional about Parker's? Or Dean's? Or Guys's? And please don't respond with the, "it's literally so obvious." Use evidence and reasoning to support your claim
@@jumpy2783Parker and Dean are essentially the same. They use the same few talking points and don't know how to adapt outside of those. Ben doesn't believe what they came prepared for him to believe which showed in the way they responded. Only that last kid stalemated Ben by essentially boiling it down to Ben just believes the Harris administration has a better chance of being successful despite Trump also being guilty of trying to break the same institutions. Trump just does it in different, less subversive ways so it's more likely to fail due tothe robust checks and balances system
Not at all -he continually shifted the goalposts of the argument which was they Biden was not threatening institutions merely because he constantly sought out different tactics in order to accomplish the same ends which the SCOTUS already declared unconstitutional. That *is* totalitarian excess and an attempted arrogation of powers that the executive has no constitutional claim to.
The issue is not that Biden utilitized the “wrong” method of forgiving student loan debt without congressional action, but that he tried to do it *at all* and REPEATEDLY attempted to forgive student loan debt. He knew damn well that that action was unconstitutional, yet didn’t care at all. Thats the issue Ben is referring to.
Ironically this is the very same criticism that was raised by the Left about Trump contesting the election and employing various strategies in order to affect the outcome he desired.
I hate the flags, people are too eager to switch it up and it kills conversation
Without flags way less people could bring up their thoughts, maybe even only one.
All these young liberals are learning more in this hour with Ben then they have in their last eight semesters😂
Adam’s (the last kid) arguments were iron-clad. As a Shapiro enjoyer and Trump-leaning voter - I cannot disagree. This is the first time in years that I hear a valid and non-emotive argument against Trump. Well done.
I'm amazed that this generation actually argues for more Govt intervention and power over their freedom and choices!?
They've been taught for 16 years that the Executive is, essentially, their father. Of course they're going to defend it and request more power for it.
They’ve been brainwashed. At the taxpayers’ expense, I might add
Bro said, "lemme cook for 3 minutes then I'll let you go". Then just didn't 😂😂
He may not have cooked but he is indeed cooked.
@@LucratiiveCuz he Indian? 😂
Literally all I wanted to see was him versus Parker and Dean
Ha...true. I was looking to see if Parker was there. He was calm this time and admitted that Shapiro was more informed than Kirk.
@@jtremaine23he was probably asked to come down. After people complained about him.
@@jtremaine23 He couldn't just cry and derail the conversation to christianity this time.
@@Macca-95 Yeah, I noticed that too.
@@leedex Yep...that's possible.
People like this Parker guy is what it has the country how you see it. In a chaos. 🤦🏻♀️
And the majority of the crowd love him 😳
It's hilarious when these students say media talking points, they are treated like they said some thing, so profound and original.
😅😅 ikr
I was.
Actually thinking the same thing. Sometimes I forget the motives of particular types of voters. Instead of thinking for yourself... They gained in energy by all agreeing in the same thing; even chanting. but yet they call us us the cult
yeah because Trump supporters don't spew the meme of the week to any criticism with no additional points.
You would know all about that I bet
@@MegaErnieMANThere’s a bunch of Trump voters and so called republicans that literally do the exact thing you’re saying
I like how this was a question directed at Kamala and all they talked about was Trump. We literally couldnt have more proof of how kamala voters and herself dont really have much to go on and to defend themselves and always resort to going for trump instead.
Exactly
To be fair to them, this election is really a which is worse type of thing. I would've preferred if they stayed on prompt but that's the only feasible way to argue this.
Kamala didn't try to steal an election she lost while spreading lies and conspiracies and inciting an insurrection. Hope that helps. It's an absurd question.
@FulvousSky that's what they say every election
@@FulvousSky you could say that about every election. If people only keep voting for the lesser of two evils, then nothing will change
Parker looked different lol . He knew what Ben is
glaze
Ben is Jewish so he can’t just degrade Christianity the entire time.
@@thegoodradish2339 never thought of that but you are not wrong.
Parker is extremely arrogant!
@@zmanadude8407goes both ways😂 zip up Parker’s pants when you’re done bud.💀
Show me in the constitution where it says abortions are legal.
Yep and they call it a right. It’s just stripping someone else of their actual right
The claim was that Harris is a threat. The response is “but Trump”
The first thing one should do is defend and then counter argue, but they don't even adress it
Both Ben Shapiro and Charlie Kirk literally ate these kids' lunches, why do they boast the conservatives lost?
Push democratic narrative. Most media and tech are pro Democrat. You can take some time to think about why
Did you not listen to a single thing the kid in the blue striped shirt said? The kid brought up example after example of how trump was a threat, Ben never denied anything he said and said every single thing trump did was bad. He just kept saying that despite trump doing all that bad stuff, despite him hiring people around him who will be more loyal to him than to the constitution, that despite trump trying to actively undermine the institutions of the US in a way we haven’t seen in over 100 years, that “oh but he won’t because our institutions will hold”, which is a bad argument. Just because a dam can hold back a flood, is an unprecedented flood not a threat to the dam? This is where Ben fell short.
Because they have a false sense of how to win a debate.
Because they only read headlines.
We're fighting a machine that owns most of the world media and entertainment. Guess what the kids spend most of their days watching?
Put this on the main channel or promote it more, these conversations are important.
9:00 In cyber security, a *threat* is an entity that has the means _and_ the motive to cause harm whereas a *risk* is one or the other, not both.
Props to Parker for being more respectful this time around. If he intentionally made an effort to change his demeanor compared to last debate, thats difficult and should be recognized.
Maybe he’s being more open minded too, maybe he’s seeing the lefts lies and insanity
It's because he went against a much smarter debater who debunked all his lies.
I agree, his debating was much better than before
Yea, he for sure came with VERY different energy this time.
@@lisetteirizarry4534 he was less aggressive but I wouldn’t attribute that to a good character. Charlie Kirk is someone who will just take the punches and not strike back with personal attacks. He’ll continue the debate without getting personal. Ben on the other hand, will bite back and Parker probably knows that.
What I like the most is ben's Heartwarming smile every time he finishes debating someone
Why wasn’t Parker this respectful when he was talking to Charlie Kirk?
Because he was talking to a Christian
because kirk is disrespectful
How does religion matter at this point? U basically saying he's more disrespectful to charlie bc charlie is a Christian and more respectful on this guy bc he is a Jewish man. Religion wasn't even mentioned in their debate😂@@dubemmba9602
@@lcmbeatdrophe is straightforward and spills the fact right at you, if you find that disrespectful then i think you have a problem jajajaj
@@Beatriz-nx5ct he constantly interrupts and is bad faith
Yo this Adam dude is very well spoken and brings up valid points. Everyone thinks Parker is the dude but Adam was solid too
"Kamala Harris is a threat" then parker talks and asks about Trump the whole time. lol
Because she's not the problem
TDS is a hell of a drug.
@reignman30 yea you should take something for that.
@@WhyulaughingSo her bailing out violent protesters from the George Floyd arguments aren’t violently bad? 🤡
wow they were serious when they said they believe trumps words 100% .... makes a lot of sense now
That's 75% of Maga that you should say that to.
I'm sorry the claim was, Harris's a threat and they spent the entire time talking about Trump?
Because it's an absurd framing when the other candidate literally tried to steal an election. Kamala is a standard politician.
Because Trump is actually a threat.
@@hobbso8508 you can definitely make that argument but they're completely ignoring the claim, likely because they know almost nothing good about Harris and everything bad about Trump.
@@archive8080 Ben shifts the argument too, for the exact reason we know. Because everyone already understands that the prompt is just a false equivolency designed to make Harris look as bad as Trump.
@@archive8080
Nah, they just know a false equivalency when they see one. It'a a blatant attempt to shift the viewpoint of voters.
It's encouraging to see a level of discourse happening here. There isn't an air of 'attack' with these conversations and America needs more of this. You people have to live with each other!
Parker isn’t as smart as he thought he was
Everyone who accepts the title of "TikTok Debater" is not as smart as they think they are.
Yeah, I was actually pretty disappointed even though I ardently disagree with him. I don’t think Kirk did well in that debate because he was so caught off guard by Parker’s manipulation tactics. Also, without the Christianity straw manning, he can’t really excel. This really shows how much of a facade he put on there.
Shapiro is also much sharper intellectually (and at 40 years old, more experienced) than both Parker and Kirk.
I mean he cooked here. I agree with Shapiro on every criticism of Kamala and the Dems attempt to alter/change/eradicate institutional restriction/limitations that would only serve their power. But there's no question Trump did the same in that instance of sending false electors. Ben should have said yes, that was a threat, I just think Kamala poses a much bigger one.
@@somesweetdreamm Ben is an Ivy-League-trained lawyer. Kirk is not. As such, they don't form arguments in the same way. However, when Parker points about specific actions Trump has taken, Ben doesn't deny them. He just dismisses Trump's behavior (because people stopped him from carrying out plans he had). The fact he even attempted to do certain things should scare everybody.
@chocolateangel8743 Stopped Trump from doing what? You're talking out your a hole.
Put this on the main channel.
His patience to go down irrelevant rabbit trails, and his knowledge to still correct on the rabbit trails are unreal. Amazing patience, kindness, and knowledge.
I’m a remote worker who has never stepped foot in my company’s office…. I got an email one day saying I had to get the c0vd booster by a certain deadline…. I ignored it, and on the day of the deadline my boss reached out and told me the people upstairs were going to let me go if he didn’t show them proof of my booster. I got it reluctantly that very day, completely against my will only for the sake of keeping my job….. I still haven’t stepped a foot in that office and have no idea why I was forced to get it. This had nothing to do with public health
You should sue those employers!...from Wyoming USA 🇺🇸 👋🤠
That last guy needs his own show, sharp, respectful and just as quick as ben.
Yeah Adam is super smart.
Except he missed Ben’s point several times about credible threats to the constitution and actually most of the students did. Kamala and Biden are much more clever and sneaky while Trump is a bull in a china shop.
he’s so underrated
What is his full name? He did a very good job.
@@rainesmallwood4078adam khan
13:44 - These folks think they have these gotcha moments, and then Ben calmly explains how there is no gotcha at all if you allow yourself to see nuance.
Hats off to everyone shown in the video today, very respectful conversations taken place here.
This is how America is great.
I love these kinds of discussions. It's really heartening to see young people use their brains to defend their views with facts not feelings. Good to Ben for participating!!
Except for the trans guy on the main channel’s full video
He was absolutely garbage....extremely ha e d to watch @@CarbonRiley
The last guy (Adam) was really good 👍🏾...funny he told the guy he would only be 3 minutes but definitely wemt longer.
Shapiro and Parker had a good respectful debate. I'm impressed
Why are people raising flags? Some participants have good points to make and they're still voted out...
Constitutional law expert VS kids who came out of the public school system?!?!
Man who thinks women are meant to be dry during sex vs people who have empathy*
So you’re saying the “kids” opinions aren’t as valid as Shapiro’s because he didn’t go to public school? Weird ass take
@@gogogadgetGlockthat’s not what their point was lmao 😭
Trump2024 🇺🇸
@@gogogadgetGlock When you don't know what you're talking about, then yes your opinion isn't as valid as someone who does know what they're talking about. In my opinion, I thought we should land the plane nose first into the terminal because it would be quicker, but the lame ass pilot thought we should use the landing gear on the runway and taxi to the terminal. Ok grandpa.
Why isn’t this on the main channel?
What trump said was "if we cant have fair elections how can we expect to uphold the constitution? Might as well throw it away." Never was meant to be taken literally.
Trump could say that he likes drinking milk or cola and democrats would say he wants to close off the water supply in the US.
@@gameplaysh6135Trump could accidentally sneeze on someone and democrats would charge him with assault
@@naruinoiscanoninanalternat2947Trump could say he would suspend the constitution but Republicans would lick the sweat from his balls, he’s deeply anti-USA and somehow the party of patriots got conned into voting for an anti-American president lol
But he's literally trying to do it. What are you people talking about. He's already tried to do it. Ben literally conceded this very thing in the video in his debate with Parker. My god you adult's analytical abilities are so poor that the only two cells in my brain have evaporated. I'm 16 and yet I can follow a basic conversation better than you people.
@@davidmays8974 mimimimimi 😴
The last kid by far had the best argument.
Why isn’t this called Ben Shapiro educates a bunch of kids
You mean a bunch of nuts 😅
Probably because that isn't what he did.
@@moriahpalmas5264 ..Exactly.
@GeriatricPimp it is what he did though? It was essentially him telling them that they were worried about the wrong things and why. it showed how much fear mongering is going on from the media.
I don’t think anyone was educating the other. For example, the kids do bring up historical examples and a knowledge of the programs and separation of powers. Ben knows this. They’re basically arguing over who is more likely to be a credible threat. They think Trump. Ben thinks Harris. None of them showed any lack of knowledge on the topics that were being argued.
Parker submitted to Ben because he knows he is outmatched.
literally none of that happened?
@@janjensen3220these ben Shapiro cheerleaders are unable to see that these students got ben Shapiro stuttering his way to the end.
@@GeriatricPimplmao what video did you watch
@@phillipgarcia7393the one you apparently didn't
@@autograndeunlimitednice gaslighting broski
The girl at the start was the best I’ve seen at the whole show this entire time. Speaks a lot of everyone’s temperament that they couldn’t stand her for more than a few minutes. Honestly seemed like the most honest one out there. And the most likely to disagree and yet still have a fair discussion, so what in the actual fuck.
Most underrated person in this clip. I’m so mad they got her kicked off
Ben killed it....these students debate themselves so they are not used to being challenged
You didn't cut the 1 liberal vs 20 conservatives but you cut both 1 conservative videos on the main channel.
What do you mean?
exactly
I’m assuming post a part of the liberal one. They are implying Jubilee is secretly conservative and biased probably.
Jubilee has been giving platform to conservative speakers very often. I ask anyone debate me on this
@@jumpy2783because reality has a right wing bias nowadays
09:02 Donald Trump NEVER said he wants to steal the next election LMAO If that was Parker, you people give him way too much credit.
He said IF. Do you know what an example is?
I'm doing 1,000 calculations in my head simultaneously and they're all wrong.
why was this cut from the main channel video ?
YES!!!!!!
Because there’s no screaming lol. Rage bait works
Cause ben destroyed
Too long and Milking
Look at the title. Kamala Harris is a threat 😂
Why isnt this on the main channel? Its gonna get shared the same anyways lmao
Cause ben destroyed them and believe it or not, jubilee is left leaning
@@Anthonyh4523💀
@@Anthonyh4523 He just tried to say Trump is trying to get rid of the constitution. He definitely did not destroy.
@@Anthonyh4523 I see what you're saying. I think it's more so for views because both people can be seen as controversial (by both sides going both ways).
I think you're right, but they also want money.
@@Anthonyh4523 Jubilee is a company and they want to make the most money. They wouldn’t routinely give people on the right a platform if they were left leaning-as they have done with many people besides Ben and Charlie, who were already popular.
And 90% of people in the commments seem to be unaware how bias we are. You’ll pick who won subconsciously before the debate starts, and then justify your conclusion throughout the entire thing.
I guarantee you if you go to say, TikTok, everyone is saying Ben was destroyed too. Jubilee don’t need to hide any debates, because everyone will just think their side won. Do you really think Ben was “destroyed” on the main channel? I doubt it.
I don’t know how anyone could stay a Democrat after listening to Ben Shapiro. He just understands things in a way that the average person couldn’t ever really comprehend fully.
How could they anyway? It's shocking that anyone is voting for Kamala. She is a total airhead.
We don't have a democracy, we have a republic. Article 4, Section 4.
We are a democratic republic.
Parker and ben sections is gonna be played in .5 speed for me to understand a word
Fr 😭
parkers not even talking fast
Parker is slow lmao Ben smoked his ass ngl 😂 loved every second of it.
@@FatalDyZrBen failed to disprove his position. He appealed to the guard rails, but then avoided the fact that trump and his minions have and are actively working to destroy those guard rails.
@@deviouskris3012❌❌❌
Remember Ben... you're taking to a guy who thinks TALKING is violence! Yes, you need to define what a "threat" is.
One of the most significant things in this video was when Ben asks everyone if they take everything Trump says seriously. The fact that everyone raises their hand just goes to show that Dems don’t ACTUALLY understand who Donald Trump is. The man is a jokester at his core and you HAVE to contextualize what he’s saying.
Everyone raised their hand? Three, maybe four people raised their hand, so we've got a different idea of what "everyone" means.
You can't just excuse everything he says by saying "he's a jokester, you can't take what he says seriously" when you have people who have actually worked for him saying he is the worst possible candidate you could imagine. That people actually WANT someone they say you can't take literally to be the person in the highest office of the country is concerning.
I mean, here in Canada we have the same sort of cult mentality regarding Trudeau supporters, who lap up everything he says and ignores anything which doesn't support their narrative. Hell, the Liberals and their supporters even try to dogwhistle the public by trying to attach MAGA to the Conservatives who, if we're to be honest, might even be slightly to the left of the Democrats in the US.
This Flag Business is nonessential
I wish jubilee would share their names each time they come up. Maybe a bio too.
They do share the name, it comes up in red text straight after they sit down.
Their handles online are also in the descriptions
The black dude with the red hair😂😂😂😂 those r the people who vote for Kamala 😂😂