Do Monsters Really Exist?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.พ. 2025
- Check us out on Patreon:
www.patreon.co...
In this video, we're looking at 5 "monsters" that may well actually be out there. Is there any evidence of these hidden species?
1. Mokele-Mbembe
2. Rhinoceros Dolphin
3. Steller's Sea Ape
4. Malagasy Hippo
5. Thunderbird
Music:
Forever Forever Always
Francis Wells
www.epidemicso...
The real monsters where the friends we made along the way
😂 tf does this even mean
@@AnAdorableWombat1 maybe their friends look weird or something
You mean Pokémon?
Some added context about the "thunderbird" photosin the video: there is a phenomenon observed starting in at least the early 2000s where different people (including myself) recalled seeing a similar "photo" in a book, but we have never been able to track down the exact book or picture. Several of the images shown in that section of the video were actually modern recreations of this "lost" photo.
I actually think this weirdly specific shared false memory is the more interesting aspect of the story!
You’re not incorrect, that picture is of a wooden model that was on display at Barnham exhibition and then passed down to a museum that was based on the proportions of a picture taken by some hunters in Iowa or Ohio or something that had a picture of a large bird they hunted that looked like they were holding it up by its wings. I believe that pic is attributed to some “gazette” or “tribune” from the Midwest.
@Offbeige I don't believe the photo we "remember" actually existed, fwiw. I think it has to be a memory our minds conjured up when hearing (reading) a description of it. There's no other explanation for why we couldn't find it in any of the books we thought it might have been in (in my case, I thought it had to be from one of the young earth creationist books I read as a homeschooled kid).
what’s the time stamp of those photos
@@MikhailTeplenskyThe thunderbird section starts around 30 minutes.
Thats called the mandela effect and its more than just that photo i believe our universe started coliding with another and its causing a swap over where shit that happened there becomes truth here while some shit that happened here is either altered or just doesnt exist anymore certain movies books toys products its a acientificaly studied phenominon and it tend to only effect maybey 1 in 100 people
Thanks for the bloopers. Made me laugh out loud for real. 😂
I definitely think there was a huge bird that soared across the vast Mississippi & Ohio valleys (that whole region) which directly inspired the thunderbird. Probably closely related to the California condor whose range used to be much bigger. Teratorns (basically giant condors) thrived during the ice age and the natives saw them dwindle to nothing (or they were always rare) which made them extra mythical. They needed a cliff to leap off of to even get airborne so they couldn't just live anywhere.
The only channel that bring light to topics that are shunned by others and reporting them in a fun and better way.
But without the massive gullibility that makes so many other channels dealing with cryptids so annoying.
Shunned? There is hardly a shortage of these kinds of videos. Most are just "I heard a guy who told this other dude that HE SEEN UM!" though. This is the same, but with actual historical references for the guy and dude in question.
My grandmother once told me the story of her grandfather who used to work in the jungle of South America.
One day he was tired of walking and sat on a big trunk and begann smoking.
Suddenly the "trunk" moved and he realized that it was a giant snake! He slowly stood up and walked away and lived to tell the story.
It was for sure an exaggeration but I found it to be an interesting story.
oh I could believe that. when large snakes have fed recently on a large meal, their body could easily expand to the circumference of a log that you would sit down on.
Its possible he encountered a large anaconda that had just eaten.
I remember hearing somewhere that Stellar's Sea Ape was just a passive aggressive jab at Vitus Bering by Stellar, stemming from pent up tensions from being out at sea too long. The face and beard were supposed to be an exaggerated mocking description of Bering, and Stellar just kept the description in his book for some reason. It could all be BS and he may actually be describing something he saw, but that's the story I heard.
I've read that
His translated records clearly call it Simia Marina Danica, but I think most people wouldnt get the sarcasm from a tired 17th century german naturalist with a crew crippled with scurvy, it was just an elaborate roast on Bering’s mismanagement of the expedition, hence him seeing he saw the creature repeatedly, tried to shoot it, and it overall acting like a monkey.
@@impendioi guess calling his beard and moustache looking like a Chinese man was also a part of that indirect roast then
Pygmy hippos, spotted dolphins and various seal type animals I can buy. Sauropods, pterodactyls and gigantic birds … nah.
“Pterodactyls” ouch…
Mokele M'bebe is more than likely a giraffe. They're rare in that region of the Congo, and the artwork depicting the creature has been interpreted as a giraffe.
The "dolphins" seem unlikely if you somewhat understand cetacean physiology. The second fin is placed directly where the blowhole would be on a typical dolphin. Assuming a shorter-than-usual back, or placement of the main fin farther back on the spine toward the tail, then the "horn" or second fin could be on the forehead/melon, which also would not make much sense because it would interfere with echolocation. Combined with the size, these animals were either some kind of shark or they were beaked whales. It could also be the animals were swimming on their sides to look at the ship, or that this appearance of two dorsal fins was based on other behaviors that resulted in misinterpretation of their anatomy.
Gigantic birds aren't that far-fetched since we do have fossil evidence that some existed in the past 100,000 years or so. It's highly doubtful they'd have survived into the modern day because of what we've done to the food supply that such a large animal would rely on, not to mention any bird that large would've had a population range somewhere between very rare and uncommon to begin with. But it would've been possible for such animals to continue to exist up until massive harm was done to the Great Plains ecosystem.
I agree that pterosaurs are pretty outlandish, especially ones that would be large and visible enough to be considered thunderbirds. If any had survived, they'd probably be small animals currently living in some remote, isolated population that makes it easy for them to continue to go undetected. Until and unless such a population of modern-day pterosaurs is discovered, we can all go on with our lives under the safe assumption that pterosaurs went extinct millions of years ago.
@@brassbucklesdo you think it’s genetically possible for a giraffe and crocodile to reproduce? Because that seems like the most likely scenario in the Congo.
@@jordyb57 The art of them doesn't indicate any crocodilian or reptilian features.
Thunderbirds are real but the last sighting was in the 80's.
That large black bird sounds like a condor
00:28 Apelike water creatures live among us. They're otherwise known as politicians.
Sea ape sounds like a giant otter. Confusing the giant feet for a tail.
Sea apes are mermaids and -men. According to Animal Planet.
location wouldnt make sense tho no?
@joshsun2844 Unless it's another species we just haven't found the fossils of. A lot of animals went extinct at the end of the last ice age.
I believe Steller’s Sea Ape was a joke meant to make fun of Berring, who he didn’t like. I love these longer videos though and the bloopers at the end made me smile :)
I'm pretty sure I've seen a good debunking of Mokele M'bebe (I hope I'm spelling that right) that broke down why the native art of the creature actually depicted giraffes. Not only do they match with other depictions of giraffes, but giraffes are uncommon in the area and match many of the ascribed traits of the animal. However, certain people with a particular agenda (young Earth creationists and cryptozoologists) pushed the idea that the animal was a living sauropod.
And that's just a lazy debunking because it's very difficult for people to go to inaccessible and dense forest and swamps of congo. Just if you don't know, the remote tribals were shown several photos including giraffe, elephant and sauropod. They pointed towards the sauropod. And for some more knowledge, there's zero records of giraffes in Congo rainforest. And the remote tribals got nothing to lie for. They are barely dependent on money and live a good life by surviving on the forest. Don't know about other cryptids, but Mokele Mbembe and jba fofi have a very high chance of existing especially the latter.
@@wildlifeisthewealthofnatur5457 they aren't remote. They have TV and books aswell as for the past 200 years people have told them about dinosaurs and what those people want to hear. I seem to remember that the name isn't even one that stops the river but a butchered word for rainbow
@@brassbuckles I asked this elsewhere but maybe you know. How would the discovery of a living dinosaur population disprove the Theory of Evolution?
@@bartstewart8644 The idea behind it is that if dinosaurs still existed as they originally did, it would (in the belief of Creationists, at least) mean that they had not evolved and had remained the same. And they'd also point to it as proof of the Great Flood and that the Earth isn't millions of years old.
In truth, all it would prove is that a small population of dinosaurs had survived and adapted to modern times. Look at, for instance, the coelocanth and the crocodile. Both are animals that have existed for millions of years, but that doesn't mean evolution has stopped for them and that nothing has changed. They just look similar to their ancestors. Things like behavior, body chemistry, etc. can change internally even if the body plan looks the same.
That said, we know that the dinosaurs that did survive were small and feathered and had already become birds, which is why we have birds today. Larger animals like sauropods weren't well suited to the world after the mass extinction. It's not out of the question that other small dinosaurs or even pterosaurs *could* have survived, but as far as we can tell none did. The chances were better for animals that were small, omnivorous, could burrow, and/or had slow metabolisms or the ability to hibernate. Scientists basically think only one type of ground-dwelling bird survived. If there had been a ground-dwelling tiny pterosaur, maybe we'd have pterosaurs today. Sauropods, even the small ones, were notoriously not tiny, burrowing, or omnivorous.
If not a wayward giraffe, I'd still say Mokele M'bebe is more likely a mammal (or a very large tortoise) than a dinosaur of any description. If you want an extinct mammal that maps very well to descriptions, the paraceratherium would be pretty close, and as it was a rhino the temperament might even match up. I'd consider it more likely that something similar to paraceratherium would survive to modern times than a sauropod dinosaur.
@@brassbuckles Thanks for that. I agree.
Your French and German pronunciation is awesome. I’ve heard no one else on TH-cam speak so well. Thank you.
The idea that a bird with a ~9 foot wingspan carried a 56 pound child at all is ridiculous. Birds are so much lighter and can carry so much less than people think. An average bald eagle only weighs about 9 pounds and has a wingspan of 6.5 feet. They're able to lift things a little over their body weight, but they can't carry them away. There is no bird that can carry away your 10 year old child, their bones are hollow, they cannot carry much.
Also, people are really bad at identifying anything about birds. We're horrible at judging size, especially without reference. We have no idea how large completely normal birds are until we're close. While my mother worked at the Raptor Center in NC, they got a ton of calls from people misidentifying birds. My favorite remains the woman who insisted that there was an eagle in her backyard that was going to eat her dog. It wasn't an eagle. It was an emu.
People are bad at birds.
An Imperial Eagle can carry a goat
@@Lupinotuum66 They can lift and drop a goat. Imperial eagles only get up to about 10 pounds. They aren't going to be able to gain altitude carrying a goat.
Here's the thing, the story, at least as reported, never saud the bird did carry off the boy, only that it "attempted to" and even said the boy was likely too heavy.
@@transmothman true
I think that its also important to note that the villagers that described seeing the "Mokele-mbembe" were specifically PAID to say that they did see it, not asked if they had seen anything. also, apparently "Mokele-mbembe" just means rainbow in their language apparently
Despite me believing most, if not all of these to be misidentifications, hoaxes or a fairy tale. Just hearing about these stories makes the mind go wild.. It's really interesting to hear about these stories
same, you don't need to buy into this stuff for it to be really interesting
There's an extinct family of gigantic birds of prey from the Americas called teratorns. I think they're theorised to be related to condors, if I remember correctly? And the dark feathers with a white throat ring description does sound condor-y. They survived for at least long enough to get caught in the La Brea Tar Pits. Could just have been a condor, of course.
31:50 Museum display of a life-size Teratorn model if I remember correctly :)
One big problem with attributing the thunderbird to a condor is that, if the woman whose son got grabbed was being honest, that wasn't a condor or other carrion-eating bird. Birds of prey are, to be fair, not all closely related (i.e. falcons are closer related to parrots than to eagles), and some of the ancient condor and vulture lineages may have had more eagle-like traits. But that being said, generally condors and vultures have significantly weaker legs than eagles, owls, falcons, and hawks since they normally eat carrion and don't have to swoop down to capture and carry it--nor take it to their nest.
@@brassbuckles True. I've also read that the teratorn's beaks were more eagle-like than condor's, so perhaps more of a hunter. Unlikely to have survived without being spotted more often, but not impossible, I guess.
@@martinharris5017 I think it was, yes. :)
@@Macallion I think it's *possible* a giant bird species (or even a couple of them) existed until fairly recently, but between modern technology like satellite etc. and the extirpation of the population of prey animals of the Great Plains (and vast reduction of prey elsewhere), any such species would have likely gone extinct sometime in the 1800s. We'd have surely detected them by now if they were around. Even if they survived that long, it probably would've been a relic population that was already teetering on the brink. It's more likely anything that big died off toward the end of the last Ice Age. Native Americans have a very long oral tradition, so they may have kept the thunderbird alive in stories long after it was absent in the living world.
The reason I specifically mention the Great Plains is simple: any bird with a wingspan that large is not flying in dense forests. It needs open space. It could live in places like deserts, canyons, high mountains, plains, and nearby to oceans and lakes. Since it's generally an inland legend, we can rule out its being native to, say, the Great Lakes or the coast. The most open place that had the greatest concentration of prey in the relatively recent past would've been the Great Plains, although if it were a relic from the Ice Age, it'd make sense for it to live in the Rockies or migrate between the Rockies and the Appalachians.
Regardless where it lived or when it went extinct, it's highly unlikely this animal still exists.
Loving this Halloween themed series you’re doing right now!
That description might be unacceptable today, but EVERYONE immediately got a perfect mental image from it.
I just realised... if we're really going through with this whole "strip animals of names that honour humans" thing... we also have some cryptids to address, like the Bird of Washington. I wonder if we'll see a day that even cryptids have scientific names just to better catalogue them, and if so I suggest we add a sub species, cryptologis ("pertaining to the unknown knowledge"). Like how domestic chickens are Gallus gallus donesticus, versus Red Jungle Fowl, Gallus gallus.
Also, thank you very much for not only making a video covering cryptids, but taking the topic seriously! These types of reports were exactly what I was referring to way back when you asked for topic suggestions! I don't know if my suggestion affected the creation of this video at all, but I still very much appreciate seeing the topic discussed with credibility.
Cadborosaurus Willsi has been given a scientific name. :)
23:58 he was definitely describing a Northern Fur Seal. They’re a very unique looking fur seal with their short muzzle and small heads.
On the show extinct or alive, they found a malagasy hippo skull less than 200 years old
The 70's Mokele Mbembe audio makes me think there was- or there still is a large mammalian in the region, but it could be anything.
I don't know why, but it made me so happy to hear you laugh! Thanks for another great video.
I've seen wild California condors flying pretty low a few times and i could easily see one of them being mistaken for a more fanciful giant bird. Even standing on the ground, they're huge.
Would it be possible for you to make a history of the giant squid? Like go through the history of descriptions and history of humans seeing the creature, just like you did with the Okapi. It would be an awesome video!
Thanks for the bloopers ❤your laugh made my day :) great video as always!
I'm pretty sure if a bird of prey with some 8+feet wingspan got its talons into a child that kid would have scars as proof.
Stellar made up the sea-ape..
I'm reading 20,000 Leagues Under The Sea, and it mentioned sea apes. The single account must have had an impact on naturalism enthusiasts of the time.
When I saw the title and thumbnail for this, I thought, "Oh, puhleese, not another nutcase video!" After that, however, I saw that it was by All About Nature, and I thought, "Oh, that's different then."
Some cryptids are plausible. Most aren't. I sometimes watch videos of them anyway because it's kinda fun, especially this time of year, even though I don't believe the creatures exist.
Wasn't the Stellers sea ape meant to be a joke by George Steller?
Seeing as its scientific name means "The Danish Sea Ape" AND that the only Dane on board was Vitus Berring, who Stellar was not so fond of, its likely just a joke he came up with in his free time and he died before he could specify it. Lousy cryptid. Piss-funny joke.
@@gaabrieloras4311When the shits and giggles became un-shits and un-giggles
I halfway wonder if the bird that attacked the boy in Illinois was an abnormally large stellars sea eagle and the way he was carried was exaggerated due to the panic and chaos.
I so look forward to your posts. A nice Saturday morning treat 🥰
The swamp donkeys that lurk in the bars late night by my house are scary.
LoL. Stealing swamp donkey
A friend of me who is from Madagascar told me that lots of people knows that hippos are still out there but that the governement wont tell where and How many because the can sell them or hunt them for rituals
Ahh , there you go , great vid and a touch of humour in the end ! Thanks and all the best Jules 💕
I'm surprised that in the section on thunderbirds you didn't mention teratornis, a giant condor that lived in North America long enough to be known by Native Americans.
31:50 like this one? Of course this is a model not an actual specimen:)
They didn't go extinct until 10K years ago. They spent at the very least 14K years together.
North and South America. BTW.
Teratorns were now thought to be less like condors and more like a weird ground hawk that would've landed and ran after small animals.
@@martinharris5017That is Argentavis, another Teratorn found in South America.
How would the discovery of a living dinosaur disprove Darwin's theory of evolution?
Just a guess but maybe because it didn’t evolve? 🤷♂️
@TroubledOnePaydirt But we wouldn't know what evolutionary changes may have happened to such creatures until we studied them up close. All kinds of animals show little sign of having changed over time (crocodiles, cockroaches, coelacanths) but they do change. And in fact, we sometimes find animals we thought were extinct! This business of creationists searching for living dinosaurs and thinking it would disprove Darwin is bizarre.
A lot of people who are against evolution don't actually understand how it works, so they think finding an animal that hasn't evolved much/at all in a long time, means evolution doesn't happen. Many of them tend to believe that evolution is a steady, linear progression among all species. Not getting that it's just random changes that may or may not stick, or may or may not lead to new species, and assume that it affects the entire population.
It wouldn’t at all, but people that dispute evolution generally don’t understand it. You can’t properly dispute an idea without understanding it, which is why people like them have never been taken seriously by the scientific community
Personally, I think the scariest monsters that exist are the two-legged, speaking kind.
Parrots?
Neat! I was just watching videos about the massive crocodile formation in the rocks in Australia 🐊
If they do exist, let's just leave them alone.
These creatures don't need our help, they need our absense
We deserve to know what the look like. To quoate Hammond again: everyone has the right to see these animals
amazing stories. And a laugh at the end. And here, all this time, I was so impressed with your pronunciation skills!
great video! really enjoyed the insights you shared. but honestly, i wonder if our fascination with monsters is more about our own fears than actual creatures. like, could it be that we're just projecting our insecurities onto the idea of monsters? just a thought!
Stellar's Sea Ape might havebeen a walrus?
Thank you for making such an entertaining video! You should team up with some graphic artists and I know a video like this would skyrocket in views!
I live in Christina Lake BC. I am by no means a conspiracy theorist, in fact I would say I am a sceptical person. I 100% know I saw the Samsquanch monster!! I don’t expect anyone to believe me (except my ex-brother in law, he saw it too)!
Sasquatch ? I believe you. I've heard it at night, Rock Creek, California about 2 am while camping. There's nothing else that could have made those obnoxiously loud whoop sounds. It woke me up , made my hair raise, my dog that never growls, growl. Nope I didn't Investigate, I shush my dog and layed perfectly still I the bed of my truck scared shirtless until I fell back to sleep. Those sounds were the sound that a really large animal would make, not an owl. This was in the early 90's
@ Yes , Sasquatch lol! Bubbles from Trailer park boys call it the “Samsquanch monster” lol . I believe I have heard them more than once as well!! Funny thing is , it sound exactly like the recordings from “seiarra sounds”! Have you heard that recording?? If so, are they the sounds you experienced?
@@aaronmatheson9730 when it happened I wasn't exactly sure what it was, I didn't want my dog waking up anyone else there, or bring attention to us. When I heard the sierra sounds guys on coast to coast am, is when I made the connection. I haven't camped there in years, and only been up there one time since. Never seen anything , just what I heard that night. I don't want to know.
I love how unscientific those "Dinosaurs" are
The bloopers were great 😂
Loved the video. Thank you for posting.
The sea ape was supposedly a joke, Steller making fun of Bering, hence why he calls it simia marina DANICA, also calling it red haired and fat.
The thunder bird has to be a species of vulture has ringed white neck, has hooked beak, brown color feathers and lighter brown feet.
Can you do a dedicated video about beavers? They are the most absolutely amazing creature ever and i would love to hear you cover them 🦫
Oh? Two lists in one night? Yes! Came here from the "What Are These Mystery Animals?" video! First one: oh it's DEFINITELY real, hiding deep in the jungle. Second one: I think they either saw sharks or a rare, now extinct species of dolphin. Third one: Stellar was more important to marine science than I thought; that being said, he definitely saw something unique, most likely now extinct. Fouth one: no idea on this one. Probably used to live there but we're always rare, now extinct on the island. Fifth one: probably sightings of pterosaurs from many centuries ago. Again, thanks for letting me play along! ❤
Thx for new cool video
The bloopers are so adorable
Rhinoceros, Sea Otter, California or Andean Condor
Tribals aren't that d umb to misidentify a rhino. They were literally shown photos of every animal including giraffe and still they pointed out to the sauropod.
@@wildlifeisthewealthofnatur5457There is evidence that they were paud to do so, but I’m not sure if it was confirmed. It’s a possibility though
*paid
hi all about nature! im chase and i love the content. recently, i found a bird species in texas that i have no idea about. no matter how much i research, i cant find the species. if i could email you the pictures do you think you could figure it out? this means a lot to me and i would love to have your help! thanks!
@@chasewarren1 Hey Chase! I'm glad you like the content! I can try to help as best I can. My email is in my profile (all.about.nature.yt@gmail [dot] com)
Short answer: yes; they're called humans
The fact that they wanted to kill everything is just disgusting I am glad they have all had to pay for all that they did but it’s still disgusting and they ruined so much of it for everyone with their careless unnecessary brutality! I hope at some point they felt ashamed and had some regret
I'm sorry but those dolphins probably did exist and we just killed them off like we do with everything else.
No.
No need to be sorry when expressing your opinion :)
My guess is, since they were only sighted once, they either weren't dolphins (the shark explanation makes sense) or they were beaked whales whose teeth were mistaken for horns or extra dorsal fins. As I said in another comment, the dorsal fin location shown in the artwork would interfere with the blowhole. Farther forward wouldn't make sense because that would be on the melon region and would likely interfere with echolocation. So a secondary fin would be more likely to show up behind the blowhole, not on top of or in front of it.
If the animals were marine mammals, it would make sense if the animals actually didn't have a second dorsal fin, but a tusk or a tooth. That's a feature typically seen in male beaked whales. Beaked whales tend to live in deep open oceans where they hunt squid, and in some (maybe most) species the male is the only one who has teeth at all, used in combat with other males. Because of where they live, their tendency to spend most of their time deep underwater, and because they seem to be both rare and shy around humans, they aren't seen often (which is why I say they *seem* rare--we don't really know). There are at least a couple of species of beaked whales that scientists believe exist based on sightings, but it can't be proven because there are no deceased specimens and no video, photographs, or DNA evidence. And, overall in shape, beaked whales resemble much larger dolphins.
Male beaked whales also sometimes have very distinct color patterns from the females, so that the easiest way to tell species apart is to compare the males, particularly their teeth. And those teeth can be very distinctive. It wouldn't be too strange for a beaked whale to develop a solitary tusk similar to how narwhals did, nor would it be strange if a species grew especially tall, curved teeth. What would be odd is that this feature, as well as the spotted coloration, appeared on all individuals, which would suggest that these were either a group of only males or that this species did not exhibit the same dimorphism present in other beaked whales.
@brassbuckles Ever pause to think that the blow hole was just... further forward? Biology has a funny way of adjusting for things... But either way, my opinion is still the same. But keep in mind this is also coming from someone who's more knowledgeable in land animals than marien animals. So I could just have made a silly statement and not know much better lol.
@@savagefurry A blowhole being farther forward would put it in the region of the melon, which is unlikely since that would interfere with echolocation abilities. Again, more likely these were beaked whales (whose teeth would certainly resemble rhino horns if they were long enough) or sharks, or dolphins engaging in other behaviors such as swimming on their sides to look up at the boat.
I'm not an expert but I *have* done a lot of reading up on various animals, especially cetaceans. I've seen all kinds of photos and illustrations, and some are built different than others. The forward dorsal fin *could* make sense on a dolphin if their rear dorsal fin was much further back than usual and the smaller one was actually in the usual location, but that would indicate the animals were actually sharks. Since the observers noted the animals didn't come up for air, the shark hypothesis makes a lot of sense--but they may have just meant that the animals weren't spyhopping or breaching like dolphins often do. In that case, add that to the large size the sailors mentioned, and it sounds a whole lot like beaked whales.
The dam squirrel trying to make a home in the engine compartment of my Ford Ranger.
Everyone on here, saying mankind is the only monster, needs to see a shrink. Y'all got issues....
The 1st one (Mokele Mbembe) was proven to be rhino 🦏 that live in the forest, local tribesmen identified it from pictures shown to them by the BBC in a 2001 documentary..
Really enjoyed this one! Thank you!
Very cool video!
Why is it always forgotten that Hast Eagles existed….that could be the thunderbird….whatever
Don't know about others, but I believe in Mokele Mbembe and jba fofi.
If monsters were real we’d just call them animals. Have you seen giraffes? Hippos?
While most of them neither fake or remain unanswered, I do believe some cryptid actually exist like Beast Of Busco and Bigfoot, Beast Of Busco is likely the biggest snapping turtle to ever exist and Bigfoot is possibly the undiscovered species of ape and I believe Champ is more likely to exist than Nessie as a completely new species of animal that we never see yet
Mokele Mbembe must be existing too. No modern humans have gone in the deepest parts of Congo. Jba fofi also has a high chance of being real.
@@wildlifeisthewealthofnatur5457 Jba Fofi must be the biggest spider species to ever exist but it is on the brink of extinction
I have to disagree about Bigfoot, I don't know anything about the Beast of Busco though. Bigfoot is *plausible,* but since no one's found credible scat, bigfoot carrion, or hairs that don't DNA test as coming from dogs or bears, it seems unlikely that the animal exists. Almost all video evidence of it could be easily faked or there is strong evidence (i.e. prior artwork, close matches to known costume designs) that it is a hoax--and hardly any videos or still images of the creature exist that are clear and high quality. I'm okay with being wrong, if I am, but while the absence of evidence isn't the same thing as the evidence of absence, there's been a general lack of evidence for Bigfoot for as long as people have talked about Bigfoot.
@@brassbuckles your comment reminds me to the old meme from 2010s saying Bigfoot is the all-time champion of hide & seek since early 1900s😂
And about Beast Of Busco, I think it is very likely it is real because there is a recent viral video showing a giant snapping turtle and what do you think about Jba Fofi? I think it is one of the most believable cryptid out there
We are the real monsters
Off topic, but your voice sounds familiar. Did you have another channel?
Nope. This is the only one I've ever posted videos on.
YES MORE BLOOPERS
42:46 What's that picture from? If it was shown, I missed it.
No need to search for imaginary TikTok monsters, one must merely glance into a mirror & they will see an image of the true monsters.
The two i'm 99% convinced of are the Tasmanian wolf and the orang-pendek.
Yours is the most fairest evaluation of Cryptids. You give them their due consideration. 42:33
There’s a video about a large bird snagging a kid in Ohio I believe and was flying away with him while his mother was watching but luckily the bird didn’t have a great hold and dropped him before the bird was able to get very high or far
Oh Congo, this place can be described in many ways: bio-diverse rainforest, native peopel treated cruelly in colonial times, Jurassic Park I'm not kidding, what did these explorers not see in this jungle we have a sauropod, a ceratops, a stegosaurus, an iguanodont, a dromaeosaurus, a spinosaurus, a pterosaur , large snakes and crocodiles and a gigant theropod which some consider an Abelisaurus, others a Carcarodontosaurus and still others a Tyrannosaurus
dont understand why "monster" is negitive. its the same thing as why cant we use "dragon" for actual animals?
The term monster denotes fiction, meaning of monster is a fiction that in itself means they are not real
It would be amazing if we had the ability to breed or design and grow animals like a dolphin with two dorsal fins , or horses with a single Horn in center of its head , pigs with wings 😂 ok now i might be getting a bit out my mind
A dorsal fin placed like how it's shown in the artwork would probably interfere with the animal's blowhole. I'm thinking it either actually was a shark of some kind (possibly even an unknown species) or a beaked whale whose tusks were protruding to the surface. Most beaked whales are only easily identifiable from the males, which tend to have more distinctive color patterns than the females and are often only identifiable by species based on their teeth. It's pretty easy to believe that a particular species could have either a singular tusk-type tooth (like narwhals) that would protrude through the upper jaw, or that its teeth would form a distinctive dorsal fin-like shape where they grew upward from the lower jaw. Given the apparent rarity of beaked whales and their open ocean habitat, plus their usual shyness toward humans, there are several possible beaked whale species that have been sighted once or twice but which lack specimen samples or video or photographic evidence to prove they exist. So to me, if the animals were mammals at all, beaked whales of an unknown species would be a prime suspect.
The thumbnail… yes monsters exist - the one shown is an evinrude.
Nice video, but you should not end each segment with "Who knows? Maybe they exist." Clearly, there is not almost any evidence supporting their existance apart from alleged sightings. Saying that there is nothing implying their existence would be way more factual.
Edit: Stellar's sea ape (also known as Danish sea ape) is just Stellar mocking his danish captain Vitus Bering for his incompetence.
real! from other videos ive seen from this guy he does this a lot
Ever stop and think you might be the monster to the animal living in nature?
It's a shame you have to put that warning for the sea ape reading, it should be clear from the context of the video
I got drunk and watched seals today
The long sharp single tooth doesn’t belong on a vegetarian animal
Yes. They do.
Short answer, yes. Monsters definitely exist, and I'm not just talking about the human kind.
Stellers sea ape was a joke about his Uncle and not a real animal, look into it
The second one sounds like a seal
Yes, they’re called humans
Monsters ❌
Humans ✅
Yeah they’re human beings the biggest monsters ever created
You actually made a video about the possibility of monsters being real and you didn’t mention Bigfoot or Dogman?!?!?
How very dare you sir
In the form of humans they certainly do but animals only do what they need to do in order to survive
Humans are the monsters...
Does anything really exist?