31 historical sources inside and out of the Bible, you have more evidence for Jesus than Napoleon... It's such a display of illiteracy to deny, it's just embarrassing
@@EduRB99 The bible cannot be used as evidence for the claims in the bible. That is circular reasoning. There is NO contemporary extra-biblical evidence to support any of the claim either. Please provide a claim from the bible and your BEST evidence to support it.
@@TheJimtanker there is no contemporary evidence for Napoleon either, your just denying historical science, denying the entire process of documentation of human history, omg what a pathetic intellectual level... You don't even understand historical evidence yet think you're capable to deny it? Atheism is low IQ or intelectual laziness...
@@TheJimtanker you can't show any evidence to suggest the Bible isn't reliable, but if you just Google it you will find plenty archaeological finds that can confirm lot's of it, plus 9 extra biblical sources confirming the New Testament, plus the entire conversation of the Roman empire, plus supernatural events happening until today! Yet you claim historical science is invalid just to maintain your baseless assumptions. Even if you could prove that the new testament is unreliable, you need a minimal reasonable explanation on why NINE extra biblical sources confirm it, but I bet you don't even know what they are... You don't even know what you claim to be unreliable, you don't even know how historical science works, yet you claim for sure it's just false based on idiots you see on the internet... Just another pathetic display of illiteracy and ignorance, just an unintellectual freak show, like all atheists trolls here, I really don't know why you guys love to embarrass yourselves and your people that way, at least show a little knowledge on the things you claim to be false, it's the bare minimal, but hey, you're not serious thinkers, you're just idiotic troll seeking attention 🤷🏻♂️
Well done Dan, It is very strong that the Apostles were very consistent with what they saw and they held onto their testimony even unto death. Really enjoyed your editing style on this one
"Faith Based Apologetics"? It seems to me that, if you didn't require faith to believe the things you believe, you would have no use for apologetics. Just sayin'.
Claiming that "atheist scholars agree" on something does not mean that it is true. and this "minimal facts" are just baseless assumptions - or do you have any kind of evidence besides your ancient fairy tales?
9 non Christian sources confirming the new testament, the testemonial of Paul that ended up converting the whole Roman Empire, the evidence is abundant, you didn't even do proper research, just want to dismiss because you think it makes you look cool or something to your other illiterate kids you hang out
Amen to that I enjoy this argument I love the power of it. We see in the bible that people have been Denying that Jesus was resurrected for thousands of years.
You need to watch some videos that criticise these type of apologetics so you can hone better arguments... When 'Godless Engineer' is debunking your videos it feels like he is reaching for the low hanging fruit. Please do more research in to the rebuttalls to your hackneyed arguments which will hopefully improve your presentation.
@@EduRB99 What faith? I'm an agnostic, atheist, anti-theist - +skeptic +++. I would prefer to see better apologetics is all. Why do you assume I am someone of faith?
@@josephde-haan1074 I'm just showing you are completely clueless, you just showed you can't even define yourself, but fall for "refutations" like "mass lunacy" those atheist trolls like to suggest, you never even really studied the history behind those arguments and came here to dismiss them, why?
@@josephde-haan1074 skepticism is your faith, you need much bigger leaps of faith to hold on to skepticism but you failed to even realize that.. You're denying historical evidence now
It is amazing to see the change they went through. Peter went from Denying Jesus to openly speaking out. Even though they knew that they could be put to death. The physical consequences didn't matter because they were looking forward to Jesus. I love it.
Your ignorance is overwhelming, the empty tomb is only valid if you can prove that character was buried there in the first place. This is another fallacy called Argument from Ignorance.
Amen! Keep speaking truth! 🙌🏼🔥👏🏼🙏🏼
Before worrying about whether jesus was resurrected or was crucified, how about demonstrating that jesus (as a specific individual) actually existed.
There is no evidence that the character portrayed in the bible ever existed. Whether nor not someone named "Jesus" existed is a mundane claim.
31 historical sources inside and out of the Bible, you have more evidence for Jesus than Napoleon... It's such a display of illiteracy to deny, it's just embarrassing
@@EduRB99 The bible cannot be used as evidence for the claims in the bible. That is circular reasoning.
There is NO contemporary extra-biblical evidence to support any of the claim either. Please provide a claim from the bible and your BEST evidence to support it.
@@TheJimtanker there is no contemporary evidence for Napoleon either, your just denying historical science, denying the entire process of documentation of human history, omg what a pathetic intellectual level... You don't even understand historical evidence yet think you're capable to deny it? Atheism is low IQ or intelectual laziness...
@@TheJimtanker you can't show any evidence to suggest the Bible isn't reliable, but if you just Google it you will find plenty archaeological finds that can confirm lot's of it, plus 9 extra biblical sources confirming the New Testament, plus the entire conversation of the Roman empire, plus supernatural events happening until today! Yet you claim historical science is invalid just to maintain your baseless assumptions. Even if you could prove that the new testament is unreliable, you need a minimal reasonable explanation on why NINE extra biblical sources confirm it, but I bet you don't even know what they are... You don't even know what you claim to be unreliable, you don't even know how historical science works, yet you claim for sure it's just false based on idiots you see on the internet... Just another pathetic display of illiteracy and ignorance, just an unintellectual freak show, like all atheists trolls here, I really don't know why you guys love to embarrass yourselves and your people that way, at least show a little knowledge on the things you claim to be false, it's the bare minimal, but hey, you're not serious thinkers, you're just idiotic troll seeking attention 🤷🏻♂️
These "facts" are so minimal as to be non-existent.
Well, give them a chance, it is very difficult to prove BS claims. LMFAO
Well done Dan, It is very strong that the Apostles were very consistent with what they saw and they held onto their testimony even unto death. Really enjoyed your editing style on this one
Thanks brother John i see this one got the attention of are Atheist friend GE again.
So what if the bible is not historically correct? The bible is the claim, not the evidence. And it don't correlate to other science.
Correct, they intentionally use Circular Argument in their apologetic claims.
"Faith Based Apologetics"? It seems to me that, if you didn't require faith to believe the things you believe, you would have no use for apologetics. Just sayin'.
Right, if they had evidence then they wouldn't need faith.
Correct, and if they believe, then you don't need faith.
Claiming that "atheist scholars agree" on something does not mean that it is true. and this "minimal facts" are just baseless assumptions - or do you have any kind of evidence besides your ancient fairy tales?
9 non Christian sources confirming the new testament, the testemonial of Paul that ended up converting the whole Roman Empire, the evidence is abundant, you didn't even do proper research, just want to dismiss because you think it makes you look cool or something to your other illiterate kids you hang out
@@EduRB99 Please do your research on basic things like "burden of proof". And it's quite the irony that you call others "illiterate" ;-)
@@MrHerbsti This is where christian DISHONESTY kicks in.
Amen. Facts! We thank God for the resurrection and our prize
Amen to that I enjoy this argument I love the power of it. We see in the bible that people have been Denying that Jesus was resurrected for thousands of years.
@@DanOnley The argument only has power if it causes those who don't already believe to believe. I don't see much evidence it has done that.
Wrong, the atheist scholars agree that it was a TREND, not that it was TRUE, big difference.
Your whole video was Circular Argument
You need to watch some videos that criticise these type of apologetics so you can hone better arguments... When 'Godless Engineer' is debunking your videos it feels like he is reaching for the low hanging fruit. Please do more research in to the rebuttalls to your hackneyed arguments which will hopefully improve your presentation.
"debunking" 🤣🤣🤣 suggesting even bigger leaps of faith isn't debunking, but hold on to your meaningless faith
@@EduRB99 What faith? I'm an agnostic, atheist, anti-theist - +skeptic +++. I would prefer to see better apologetics is all.
Why do you assume I am someone of faith?
Also do you think this type of comment your making is going to bring anyone in to conversation?
@@josephde-haan1074 I'm just showing you are completely clueless, you just showed you can't even define yourself, but fall for "refutations" like "mass lunacy" those atheist trolls like to suggest, you never even really studied the history behind those arguments and came here to dismiss them, why?
@@josephde-haan1074 skepticism is your faith, you need much bigger leaps of faith to hold on to skepticism but you failed to even realize that.. You're denying historical evidence now
I'm preaching through Acts & it is amazing to see the transformation of the apostles. They were on fire!
It is amazing to see the change they went through. Peter went from Denying Jesus to openly speaking out. Even though they knew that they could be put to death. The physical consequences didn't matter because they were looking forward to Jesus. I love it.
It's almost like nobody else went through any radical changes!
Enjoyed the style of this video. Some quality apologetics, my man!
Thanks guys that really means a lot to me. I have been trying to raise the bar for apologetic channels little bit at a time.
Do you define something as quality apologetics based on how non-believers react to it, or how it gives good feelings to those who already believe?
Your ignorance is overwhelming, the empty tomb is only valid if you can prove that character was buried there in the first place.
This is another fallacy called Argument from Ignorance.