I Ignored My Own Advice, and It Worked SO WELL

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Get Luminar Neo: bit.ly/3XaEhd2 (Coupon Code AFF-ToozTL saves 20%)
    Want to make better photos? Sub to my newsletter (and get FREE Luminar PRESETS!): jimnix.com/newsletter
    **********************************************************************
    #LuminarNeo #photography #tutorial
    **********************************************************************
    The links I use for Skylum Software, Topaz Labs, On1, DXO, Nik Collection, Amazon, Excire Foto, Mylio, Ocudrone and others are affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. If you purchase anything using these links on their respective sites, I make a small commission which supports all of these great videos. Your cost is the same regardless of whether you use my links or not. It's a free way to support all this training I provide. Thanks!

ความคิดเห็น • 27

  • @Centauri27
    @Centauri27 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wow, not starting with Develop RAW is like breaking the Prime Directive! 😆Good reminder to be more curious and experiment more. I've watched so many of your videos that I also automatically go Develop RAW, Supercontrast, Toning every time as well. Starting with anything else always makes me feel like I'm "missing" something.

    • @JimNix
      @JimNix  หลายเดือนก่อน

      haha thanks Carl, and yeah it was weird to break out of my normal structure, but it kinda worked for me on this one

  • @williamschone9358
    @williamschone9358 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    As always, another great video Jim. I know you have more to do than time allows, but it would be really interesting to see you edit this photo using your “normal” process, just to see the differences. Wouldn’t even necessarily require a video on it (although it would be nice) but then a very good “this way or that” could be illustrated. But even if you don’t have time to put that together, great video showing yet another way of utilizing the power of NEO. Thanks again.

    • @JimNix
      @JimNix  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thanks and yes that is a good idea for a video, so I will look into it. There are lots of ways to approach an edit and get to the results you like, so showing that makes sense. Thanks!

  • @jean-francoisdamon4847
    @jean-francoisdamon4847 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Merci Jim pour cet excellent exposé.

    • @JimNix
      @JimNix  หลายเดือนก่อน

      thank you Jean-Francois!

  • @rogerbehymer4412
    @rogerbehymer4412 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Terrific and timely advise. I use the exact same workflow every time and need to break away.
    Another piece of advise we get all the time is "never push it all the way to 100". Sometimes using 100 on one tool and then adjusting the effect with another tool can create an unexpectedly pleasant result.
    Thanks for sharing this.

    • @JimNix
      @JimNix  หลายเดือนก่อน

      thanks for watching!

  • @craigbartschi4990
    @craigbartschi4990 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great video Jim, we are creatures of habit, good to see some thinking outside the box to learn new things.

    • @JimNix
      @JimNix  หลายเดือนก่อน

      thank you Craig!

  • @Kit2Canada
    @Kit2Canada หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellence demo thanks!

    • @JimNix
      @JimNix  หลายเดือนก่อน

      thanks Kit!

  • @tompatton2086
    @tompatton2086 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great advice Jim. It's easy to fall into a familiar editing pattern, especially when you're working with a LOT of photos. Something I've noticed in "Develop/Develop Raw" is that the "Curves" tool is overly responsive. The least little adjustment to the tool creates an overly aggressive change to the photo. Just wondering if you've found that to be the case and if there's any way to make the "Curves" tool adjustments more subtle (an "Opacity" option for all these tools would be helpful, and probably not that hard for Skylum to implement. Nudge nudge 😁).

    • @JimNix
      @JimNix  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hi Tom and yes I have noticed that. I have asked for an opacity slider for each filter for a long time now. We will see if we get one. (fingers crossed)

  • @davidchandler4788
    @davidchandler4788 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Would be interesting to compare this edit to a "Jim Nix Standard" edit. Would it be different?

    • @JimNix
      @JimNix  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      good question Dave and probably a little different but not significantly, which in itself is kinda interesting

    • @DigitalPhotoMentor
      @DigitalPhotoMentor หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      great question

  • @andrewmckinney3053
    @andrewmckinney3053 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Experiment! A great reminder. Thanks, Jim!!

    • @JimNix
      @JimNix  หลายเดือนก่อน

      thanks Andrew!

  • @jamestibbel
    @jamestibbel หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Definitely a great result. Thanks for sharing. I am curious how this would come out as a print.

    • @JimNix
      @JimNix  หลายเดือนก่อน

      thanks and yes good question, haven't thought about printing it

  • @shawndonnelly5317
    @shawndonnelly5317 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for another great video Jim.

    • @JimNix
      @JimNix  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      thanks for watching Shawn

  • @terrylawrence412
    @terrylawrence412 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great idea ... but if you use landscape first, does that change the file from a raw file?

    • @JimNix
      @JimNix  หลายเดือนก่อน

      yes I skip over Develop Raw in this example

  • @marcdeckard6115
    @marcdeckard6115 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Now it looks like the result of a total thermonuclear exchange.

    • @JimNix
      @JimNix  หลายเดือนก่อน

      LOL