Solving Exponential Equation Using Logarithms | Exponential Equation Tricks For Olympiad Math.

In this video tutorial "solving exponential equation using logarithms", I will guide you on a step-by-step walkthrough in solving this exponential challenge with easy.
The application of some laws of indices and logarithms are paramount to solving this challenge i.e the division law of indices, division law of logarithms, power law of logarithms, simple arithmetic laws etc.
Watch this video from the beginning to the end without skipping any parts in order to get all the secrets therein.
Please, kindly promote this video by sharing this video with as many that need this knowledge using the video link below:
• Solving Exponential Eq...
Thanks for the love you all have for Onlinemathstv and we all here love you 100% in return ❤️❤️💖💖💕💕😍😍🎉🎉🎉🙋🙋🙋
#maths #howto #onlinemathstv

[@rakeshkumarrkk5498]

Great❤❤

[@hogec_enlightenmentarena6975]

Well explained prof. Thanks for dropping this powerful solution sir 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🙏🙏🙏🙏👍👍👍👍

[@charlesmitchell5841]

Love the way this guy teaches!

[@pepita7053]

For-mi-da-bl-e...merci!!

[@Justabadplayer12]

Thank you sir

[@kaushikbasu9707]

very hard and nice math

[@MartinPerez-oz1nk]

THANKS PROFESOR!!!!!, VERY INTERESTING!!!!!!

[@andresomarlegarda616]

Muchas gracias profesor

[@therichcircle.8819]

Great teacher. You are wonderful prof. Thanks again and again for this detailed explanations on this question. Respect prof.....👍👍👍

[@lukman1615]

Good afternoon,many thanks for the works you’ve been doing so far.
There was a little error while you were applying the division rule of indices.
It’s supposed to be :
(3^x/3^5)*(5^3/5^x) = (ln3/ln5)
Which should result to;
(3^x/5^x)*(5^3/3^5) = (ln3/ln5)
(3/5)^x = (ln3/ln5)(3^5/5^3)

[@dayhocconghien]

thanks

[@ToanPham-wr7xe]

😮

[@GREAT.P]

🎉🎉🎉

[@danielfranca1939]

Prof man, welcome back teacher and thanks for the detailed tutorial sir.

[@Joe-b4c7n]

Hola cómo estás excelente muchas gracias por tu enseñanza desde san Felipe de puerto plata primeras espadas de la restauración general Gregorio luperon machete carajos ☕🍩🇩🇴

[@SiRasputin]

Eeeeesi 😊

[@dionysos46]

You should have get out the ^3 & the ^5 from the upper ln expression, which can turn in a ln sum, and simplify the division for one term.
Kinda Wolfram Alpha (Yeah, I know): x = (5 log(3) - 3 log(5) + log(log(3)) - log(log(5)))/(log(3) - log(5))

[@joycemenges4769]

What causes you to choose natural logs (ln) over logs?

[@davidhowe6905]

It was just a choice; as long as you are consistent, the answer is the same. I prefer natural logs as they occur often in practical situations e.g. radioactive decay (also, they're 'natural' 🙂)

[@Nshutiphysique]

Thanks you are good teacher but I have talent for teaching although my family is poor I need help

[@chuksnonso2320]

🥁🥁🥁🎤🎤

[@jasv2011]

Ugly excessive! Not applicability in te real world

[@AiméNAINA]

I am sorry, the result is fault, the solution is x=-11,5267556 instead -0,55379

[@MrMenassa1]

I agree with you

[@davidhowe6905]

I got -0.55383 (rounded to 5 decimal places); I checked the full calculator answer back in the original question and it works. I think there may be a small numerical error in the video answer, but I don't see where -11.5267556 comes from, as you and MrMenassa1 found.

[@Nshutiphysique]

Thanks you are good teacher but I have talent for teaching although my family is poor I need help